Go Home

This is exactly why I've always been suspicious of Bill Gates' "philanthropy." Yes, I understand that he's done wonderful things in Africa, but the United States is where we live and there is a very real and lasting battle going on over the future of public education.

While union-busting is certainly one goal of the privatization monsters, profit is the primary goal. Education for profit is lucrative and alluring, especially to people with large sums of money parked and waiting for investment in big-profit items. So when Bill Gates claims to stand for education reform in this country, I place him squarely in the category of those who stand to profit from privatized education.

Now we have this grant from the Gates Foundation to ALEC, of all things. It isn't a small grant, by any stretch. $376,635 to be paid over a period of 22 months. That's about $17,000 per month dropping into the coffers of one of the most evil organizations in the country. The grant description reads as follows:

Purpose: to educate and engage its membership on more efficient state budget approaches to drive greater student outcomes, as well as educate them on beneficial ways to recruit, retain, evaluate and compensate effective teaching based upon merit and achievement

Wow, Michelle Rhee must be doing a happy dance right about now. I've tried to turn this around and imagine ways that this money could be used to counter the usual right-wing memes about the wonders of privatization, but I just can't seem to find any way to do that. I can only conclude that Mr. Gates and his fellow trustees fully embrace the notion of killing public education one state at a time.

Lee Fang wrote a tremendous article for The Nation a couple of weeks ago about online education and how profitable it is, at the expense of public education. In it, he describes a talk lobbyist Patricia Levesque gave to philanthropists. Among those listening were representatives from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Among her suggestions:

Levesque noted that reform efforts had failed because the opposition had time to organize. Next year, Levesque advised, reformers should “spread” the unions thin “by playing offense” with decoy legislation. Levesque said she planned to sponsor a series of statewide reforms, like allowing taxpayer dollars to go to religious schools by overturning the so-called Blaine Amendment, “even if it doesn’t pass…to keep them busy on that front.” She also advised paycheck protection, a unionbusting scheme, as well as a state-provided insurance program to encourage teachers to leave the union and a transparency law to force teachers unions to show additional information to the public. Needling the labor unions with all these bills, Levesque said, allows certain charter bills to fly “under the radar.”

This particular talk was being given in the context of online education and the perceived value of permitting online charter schools, funded with public education dollars. Levesque's clients?

But Levesque wasn’t delivering her hardball advice to her lobbying clients. She was giving it to a group of education philanthropists at a conference sponsored by notable charities like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation. Indeed, Levesque serves at the helm of two education charities, the Foundation for Excellence in Education, a national organization, and the Foundation for Florida’s Future, a state-specific nonprofit, both of which are chaired by Jeb Bush. A press release from her national group says that it fights to “advance policies that will create a high quality digital learning environment.”

Lee talked with K-12 News Network's Cynthia Liu and I on the MOMocrats podcast Wednesday. He had plenty to say about online charter initiatives and their impact on the educational system.

Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: 18
WMV
PLAYS: 54
Embed

In the state of Florida, this report from August highlights the cozy relationship between Florida's Governor Rick Scott and the for-profit charter organization Charter Schools USA, after he spoke to a conference of employees:

Speaking to the crowd of about 2,000 Charter Schools USA employees, Scott gave a nod to the charters that are independently operated, but financed with tax dollars. Charter USA manages 25 charters in Florida with about 23,500 students, making its operation larger than 40 of 67 public school systems in the state.

He said charter schools must prove their promise as an escape route for students "stuck in poor performing schools."

"You have to make sure that you are great," he said. "If you don't, you are going to get a lot of criticism."

Charters were under fire earlier this summer when school grades came out and charters earned nearly half of the 31 F grades handed out statewide, although they represent only a fraction of the state's more than 3,000 public schools.

Oh, and guess who else was at this rally? That's right, Michelle Rhee! So here we have a "rally" paid for by a for-profit organization funded solely with public money that might otherwise go directly into the public school systems in Florida, complete with buses to transport employees from their various locations to the lovely Rosen Plaza Hotel. Faced with criticism over the event, here's what Governor Scott had to say:

The for-profit management firm, which is paid with tax dollars, bused in employees from across the state for the daylong event, including lunch, at the upscale Rosen Plaza. Orange and Seminole school district officials said the expense was misguided when schools across the state face a budget crisis for daily operations.

"Leave it to the local educators to decide how to best spend their money," Scott said.

Charter schools, including those managed by Charter Schools USA, have complained that they are inadequately funded by the state.

I wonder if Scott would say that about a similar event for public school teachers? Somehow, I doubt it.

This organization and others like it exist because ALEC is busy at work coordinating with legislators on the state level to throw a bunch of union-busting tactics into the fire in order to sneakily pass state authorizations for online charter schools. Thanks to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, they now have nearly $400,000 more to use toward that goal.

With friends like that, who needs enemies?

About karoli
karoli's picture
Card-carrying member of we, the people.
Share This Post

Link To This Post


46 Comments
Liberal AND Proud's picture

Will the next release of Gate's OS be called Windows Hate?


"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."

stewartm0205's picture

who believe they have the right to write our laws although we did not elect them?. Is it that evil organization dedicated to the destruction of the middleclass and the enslavement of our nation?

karoli's picture

Which is enormously frustrating to me.

Gene214's picture

The only reason I have Winblows on any of my machines is because I occasionally do some pc repair and troubleshooting on the side and therefore need to know how Microshit's crappy operating systems work. On my personal machines, it's open source all the way (Ubuntu Linux, Open Office, Gimp, Blender, etc). I refuse to give this Kochsucker a dime of my money. I don't suppose Gates or Scott or any of these other pricks have given thought to how kids who come from homes too poor to have computers are supposed to benefit from online charter schools. No, no thought about that. Just grab the money.


If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders.

George Carlin

and the other billionaire good cops were real nice guys.


CTHULHU 2012 "Why vote for a lesser evil?"

Skruffy's picture

Very disappointing that Gates wants ANYTHING to do with this horrid organization.

BigDaddyMalcontent's picture

got his reputation as a "liberal." His foundation has also donated to the Discovery Institute and it has partnered with Monsanto to coerce Europe into accepting GMOs.

BigD145's picture

Supporting ID/Creationism is not Liberal.

BigDaddyMalcontent's picture

Re-read my comment. I said, "I DON'T KNOW HOW GATES GOT HIS REPUTATION AS A LIBERAL."

BigD145's picture

I know what you said. No need to shout.

BigDaddyMalcontent's picture

It looked like you thought I was supporting ID.

motocat's picture

this subject come up. I, too, have long been suspicious about Gates and his foundation.
Even if people hate MS they love Bill Gates, don't ask me why. People don't want to
look beyond the surface of the "good" the foundation does, or Gates' nerdy exterior.
He gives me the creeps, like he's finally getting even with everyone. Anyway, it's good
that he's finally giving us a glimpse of what's going on behind the scenes. And as someone
who lives in Florida and hates Jeb and Scott, it's sickening to watch what's unfolding.

and neither is the fact that a lot of people get fooled in the process.

"Charity foundations" are the ultimate tax loopholes for the wealthy at so many levels, it is not even funny...


CTHULHU 2012 "Why vote for a lesser evil?"

BigDaddyMalcontent's picture

Either that or Bono is just a poseur.

Wolfsinger's picture

Total poseur.

Gene214's picture

As much as I love U2's music, I'm sick to death of seeing Bono's mug on teevee or in the news. Bono the lead singer for U2 is a talented musician, but Bono the man is nothing more than a corporate whore.


If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders.

George Carlin

BigDaddyMalcontent's picture
LOL

!!!!

Skruffy's picture

His name had to come up in this, I guess.

When he instituted standardized testing in Florida schools, guess whose company came up with educational software for students to use for prepping for the tests?

Brother Neil Bush. Any bets about whether the Bush family is in on the ground floor of these high-profit online alternative education programs Florida Governer Rick Scott is pushing to replace public schools?

Microsoft was on its way to being broken up until Bush got in and MS was able to buy their way out of the Justice Dept action.

Gates and MS have always copied or bought innovative technology; never have they developed it. Gates could never do enough charity work to repay the millions of hours that people have wasted trouble shooting their lousy software. They had all the money in the world to make great products, and they didn't. They used their customers as beta testers to discover all the bugs and allowed massive distribution of viruses in their insecure software. They would pre-announce a product to stifle the competition and kill their sales, so they could then buy the smaller, innovative companies. They are a prime example of a criminal corporation. I would have prefered that the Justice Dept had fined them millions and broken up the company. The Europeans have been a little harder on them, but not enough. MS-Windoz set back computer technology decades. I wasted years of my life on the crap in work, even as all the time I had Macs at home. Talk about Kool Aid, the MS Windoz movement is the worst bunch of true beleivers I have ever run into. Now I am the trouble shooter at my present job for the Windoz system, even as I have talked a few fellow employees into getting Macs for their home machines.

Gene214's picture

Don't forget, Microsoft was notorious for strong-arming computer vendors to ship their machines with Winblows. That's why it's taken so long for Linux to gain a toehold on the American pc market. Microsoft should have been hit with an anti-trust suit a long time ago.


If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders.

George Carlin

BigD145's picture

Intel is also in on this bit of strong-arming.

Because it blows. Window$ just takes it up the ass.

BigD145's picture

You're discouraged from trouble shooting or customizing the MacOS, so kudos to M$ for allowing users to do anything at all with their system and not having to use an extended DOS interface like Linux.

da fuck?


CTHULHU 2012 "Why vote for a lesser evil?"

Colin Day's picture

So, you don't like using a console? What, is text so evil that you will not use it? Besides, much of Linux can be configured using GUI tools.

And why would you consider a console as a DOS interface? Unix had consoles a decade before DOS ever existed.

Colin Day's picture

Well, maybe not consoles, but it had shells years before DOS.

jonnyj's picture

If I remember the name right, XWindows was a full functioning windows interface running on UNIX while M$'s version was basically a DOS shell (3.1 & 3.2). Running on UNIX it was far better multiuser and multitasking OS than any M$ window$ has ever been.

Interestingly, it was doing all this on a far less powerful computer than I have on my desktop now.

Colin Day's picture

True, but I was speaking of the very beginning of Unix. I believe they used teletypes in 1969.

one pretty much worked and the other has pretty much not worked, even as the company developing it had huge resources. I was a beta tester for Win-95, and it crashed my machine 2 dozen times a day, for about a year. Never would have had the time (or admitedly, the knowledge or interest) to do anything but reboot.

Wolfsinger's picture

Gazillionaire Corporation and CEO is REQUIRED to throw away an remaining traces of American decency, fair-mindedness and equality and instead sign an oath of absolute loyalty to the Koch Brothers and their Jack-booted Fascist Thuggery.

Way to go, Bill. Exploitation and Robber Barrons-R-You.

Your worship of the all mighty dollar has bought you a Legacy, alright.

If there is truly any Justice left in the world after you and your Thug friends have destroyed it for the sake of a dollar, it would be that you will soon be sharing a permanent prison cell with both Charles and David - sans Windows.

calandra_speaksout's picture

it is a prison film

Roberto Begnini: "excuse me, Jack, do you say in English, I look at the window, or do you say I look out the window?"

John Lurie: "I'm afraid, in this instance, ya gotta say I look at the window, Bob"


your name's Lebowski, Lebowski... and your wife is Bunny

...is that public schools are fucking horrible.

I went there, I had some good experiences, I learned some valuable stuff, but my god, most of it was just being bored to death by someone who cared a lot more about having students sit still and keep quiet doing busywork than they cared about engaging developing intellects.

It is outrageous to me how badly schools in poorer regions suffer from lack of resources. I would have thought that delivering a consistent quality of service to all regions would be the trump card of a public system, but it fails even on this point.

On one hand, I don't like the idea of turning education into a for-profit enterprise. On the other hand, our current system is such a total failure it's appalling.

Here in Canada, we're proud of our universal health coverage, yet we act as if the same model (a single tax-funded gov't payer covering the costs of services provided by private organizations) would be disastrous for education. I don't claim to have the answers, but I do wish that there was a greater variety of teaching and testing models available to parents and students, that there was more emphasis on outcomes (i.e. ability to gain and actually use knowledge), and less disparity in quality.

Another dilemma I have is that I'm a huge union supporter, but I do think that bad teachers should be more effectively weeded out, and good teachers paid much, much better.

I don't have concrete solutions to propose, but I have very little love for the current setup.

innocent bystander's picture

just go to communities in the u.s. where the money is, and you will find them ... but, private or public, you need money to run good schools ... and i'd rather have that money going to educational content, facilities, and staff salaries in my community than to corporate management god knows where

as for the bad teacher problem, i think the scum who crashed our economy -- or, really, the personnel in any industry in america -- show us that the private sector is no better at weeding out incompetence and corruption ... but the public sector has for too long failed to use union contract mechanisms to address bad teachers ... union contracts do not protect bad teachers, lazy administrators do ... and nothing makes an administrator lazier than the community message of "we don't care" that is sent when schools are woefully underfunded and when parents who are able to make the time do not bother to get involved


there is a time ... when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part. you can't even passively take part -- mario savio

more educated and more involved in their child's development. As much as I think there's a need for welfare, there should also be regulations that if you're on welfare and have children that you must become proactively- and visibly- involved in your child's education. You're so correct about the administrators. They're lazy because there's no involvement from the parents. But this also lies with the school boards- and the lazy electorate who elect them, or fail to vote.

innocent bystander's picture

i think i'd rather hear that gates was funding white supremacists


there is a time ... when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part. you can't even passively take part -- mario savio

miss_kitty's picture

to say the least.

Sad Iron's picture

Well, sweet lord, did you see that piece of crap "opinion piece" that CNN ran that was really an advertisment for For-Profit, Online education (I believe it was called "Why Does College Cost So Much?"). One of the hired hacks was an "economist" from Ohio State who managed to write an entire article without once mentioning state budget cuts as a reason for rising tuition--the culprit was, predictably, overpaid faculty with good parking spots. CNN knows it's trash--they were probably paid to post it on the front page. Read it and weep: http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/02/opinion/vedder-...

Uh-oh's picture

Bill is NOT a nice guy. Bill has never been a nice guy. Bill has ALWAYS been an asshole. Americans have to get over the idea that some people got rich because they were better or smarter or just deserved it more. There is nothing more to admire about Bill than there is about Trump or the Kochs.


Uh-oh!

jonnyj's picture

Rick Scott and Bill Gates are 2 peas in a pod. They both got to where they are by theft.

Scott made his millions stealing from Medicare and Medicaid.

Bill stole every idea from every innovative programmer that dared to try to sell software. He often just did it for the fun of it; if he saw someone selling a cheap little utility for $5, he would copy the idea and include it for free in the next version of M$-CP/M M$DOS.

jonnyj's picture

Daddy just gave Jeb his money and bought him the Governor's job. Like Rick Scott, the FL Gov job to him was just another way to make money without actually earning it.

We'll just overlook his business practices of stealing and bullying competitors out of business, stifling an industry that would have been far more advanced by now. His contributions to help "aids" in Africa is all about propping up his big pharma investments- and the obvious huge tax breaks for doing so. But being a "denier" is so toxic that trying to make that argument is a waste of time.

DJ13Francis's picture

You know, I grew up in Seattle. One time years ago, I was at this lecture at the University of Washington and ended up sitting next to Bill Gates for like an hour. I was sitting in the back row and about ten minutes after it started dude came in and sat down next to me in the back row. We sat watching this lecture for about an hour or so. I knew who he was... At the time I was like, "Holy crap, that's Bill f'n Gates, I can't believe he's sitting right f'n next to me!!!" Well... Today I'm wishin' that on that day, instead of being awkwardly starstruck and not saying a damned word to him, that I'd punched him right in his stupid face. F him and his little dog too.


Teaching zombies to dance ain't easy!

www.davidjamesfrancis.com

Tax the Rich's picture

Why is it when someone becomes super rich, they are suddenly experts in shit they know absolutely nothing about?

Were going to reform education by getting rid of and micromanaging teachers? Yeah, that makes sense.

I cannot tell you how many outstanding knowledgeable teachers I know who have left the profession in recent years, so morons like Bush and Obama could suck corporate cock and pretend they are doing something.

Dozens of outstanding Blue Ribbon schools in our area, have become nothing more than ACT Test Prep centers, thanks to the evil traitorous scum in both parties.

They have already destroyed the parents, now these fascist bastards are coming after the kids.


Rush Limbaugh is what a smart person thinks a stupid bigot sounds like.

run_dmc's picture

The Gates Foundation has given a $300K grant to ALEC solely to support them in helping state policymakers understand the common core education standards adopted by most states in the US. What, of course, you fail to mention because it doesn't suit your goal of maligning Bill Gates is that the Gates Foundation has also given MILLIONS of dollars in grants to the teachers' unions - to both the AFT and the NEA - both of whom are partnering with the foundation on their work supporting teachers. Doesn't exactly fit your narrative, but it's true. Try researching your work more thoroughly next time.