Go Home

campaign contribution

7 documents found in 0.001 seconds.

Republicans trying to get Montana ad pulled

I posted the new ad here.

The Republicans are making an absurd legal argument to get Montana TV stations not to run the Burns ad. They are asserting that Abramoff didn't give Burns campaign contributions even though he organized fundraisers, got people to go to them, and gave the money they raised to Burns....read the letter here that the GOP is sending around to television stations in Montana.

Their spin is tantamount to saying that ActBlue didn't provide any financial help to Hackett. It's a false argument.



Get Adobe Flash player

DOWNLOADS: (925)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (1299)
Play WMV Play Quicktime
Embed

Seems that Sarah Palin isn't the only right-winger out there trying to convince the world that the "death panels" actually exist. Indeed, as Media Matters notes, there's a whole bandwidth of wingnuts out there trying to revive the notion.

One of these is the Troll Who Lives Under the Bridge And Sucks Your Toes, aka Dick Morris, who was on The O'Reilly Factor earlier this week with fill-in host Monica Crowley:

Morris: Look, Monica, it's one thing to load a big bill with pork. That's what the stimulus package was. But to load a health-care bill, where Americans are seriously worried that this is gonna destroy the health care their parents get, that this is gonna lead to government-imposed euthanasia, where they'll say, 'No, you can't have this annual mammogram, because I know it might save your life, but it costs too much.' 'No, you can't have this drug for colon cancer, because the drug we're going to let you take isn't as good as this one, but we can't afford it.' When we come to those kind of euthanasia-like decisions, to learn that the reason the Senate approved this was some little bitty payoff that went on to some insurance company that gave you a campaign contribution -- that kind of tawdry stuff for this kind of magnitude of deformity on the system is enough to drive people crazy -- me included.

I've always said that anyone who takes Dick Morris's advice deserves everything they get, because the man is such a font of misinformation. That includes a lot of intentional disinformation, promoting provably false "facts" that unhinge the people who absorb this crap. As we can see.



Mike's Blog Round Up

Obsidian Wings: National Review — wrong about those Democratic 'economic elites' and campaign contributions.

Alicublog: National Review — wrong about McCain's chances of selling the GOP as "the party of optimism" in 2008.

Sadly, No: National Review — wrong about the homeless causing global warming. (Hmm, I'm sensing a trend here.)

Eye on Economics: Distributorcap NY examines growing socio-economic inequality, while Brad DeLong and Paul Krugman explain why you should hate some economists — something to do with endorsements of McCain's "wildly irresponsible" tax proposals.

Guest roundup by Batocchio. Please e-mail submissions and tips to Batocchio9 at yahoo dot com. Thanks!



Losing the military vote

military_vote.gif The conventional wisdom suggests the troops vote Republican. It's been this way for a generation, and it's not going to change.

But if campaign contributions are any indication, the GOP is losing the troops.



DeLay's K Street buddies want their money back.

One side note to the Tom DeLay resignation story that didn't get much attention last week was the fact that DeLay was poised to step down for quite a while, but had to pretend to be interested in keeping his seat, in part for financial reasons.

An additional impetus for putting off the resignation until now was suggested by John Feehery, a former aide to DeLay and House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.). "He needed to raise money for the defense fund. That was the bottom line," Feehery said. "He wanted to make sure he could take care of himself in the court of law."

In other words, DeLay was raising money from suckers supporters under false pretenses. He asked contributors for financial support, telling them that he needed the money to help with his campaign, when in reality, DeLay knew he'd have to resign and he wanted the donations for his legal defense. DeLay's con is legal, but obviously dishonest. With this in mind, it's not terribly surprising that some of these donors would like their money back. One lobbyist said it's "nauseating to think about" his campaign contribution going to subsidize DeLay's legal team. "That all this money will go to the legal defense fund, it sickens me," he added. "I have to pay for that?" Apparently so. As K Street lobbyists should realize by now, sometimes, when you lay with dogs, you get fleas.

-- posted by Steve Benen-The CarpetBagger Report



Joe DiGenova

Joe DiGenova

Friday Funnies via Josh Marshall

"The author Carl Hulse then quotes Joe DiGenova saying, "The department has rarely charged campaign contribution cases. It would be a surprise that a contribution that has been lawfully reported" would lead to a criminal charge. He identifies DiGenova as a "a defense lawyer and former federal prosecutor." ...read on

Anyone see something wrong with this description of Joe?



Sen. Conrad Burns: Doesn't Pass the Smell Test

A picture named Smell-Test.jpg

Here's the new ad by the The Montana Democratic Party. The ad, which begins airing Monday on television stations around the state, urges Montanans to call Burns and ask him to start working for the people of Montana.

icon Download | play -QT

The ad highlights Burns’ connections to controversial lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who is currently under federal investigation. Between the years 2001 and 2004, Conrad Burns received more campaign contributions than any other member of Congress from Abramoff, his partner, and his tribal clients.