Go Home

stanley

12 documents found in 0.001 seconds.

Mike's Blog Round Up

Obsidian Wings: Afghanistan – the absence of option C, about that timeline, and the real revelations of the McChrystal story.

They Gave Us a Republic: R.I.P. free speech.

A Tiny Revolution: Why is Robert J. Samuelson so incredibly awful?

World-O-Crap: Abortion-seeking women - won’t someone think of the man-child?

Brilliant at Breakfast: Why does Mike Huckabee spend so much time thinking about gay sex?

Guest post by Batocchio. Temporarily e-mail tips to batocchio9 AT yahoo DOT com.



McChrystal Asks For More Troops; Obama Mulling Over Options

Why do I feel like I've seen this movie before? I'm hoping against hope for a different ending this time: America having the strength to walk away from something that will drain our resources with no clear goals in sight.

The top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan warns in an urgent, confidential assessment of the war that he needs more forces within the next year and bluntly states that without them, the eight-year conflict "will likely result in failure," according to a copy of the 66-page document obtained by The Washington Post.

Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal says emphatically: "Failure to gain the initiative and reverse insurgent momentum in the near-term (next 12 months) -- while Afghan security capacity matures -- risks an outcome where defeating the insurgency is no longer possible."

His assessment was sent to Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates on Aug. 30 and is now being reviewed by President Obama and his national security team.

McChrystal concludes the document's five-page Commander's Summary on a note of muted optimism: "While the situation is serious, success is still achievable."

But he repeatedly warns that without more forces and the rapid implementation of a genuine counterinsurgency strategy, defeat is likely. McChrystal describes an Afghan government riddled with corruption and an international force undermined by tactics that alienate civilians.

But Obama is trying to figure out whether that's actually the road he wants to take:

Instead of debating whether to give McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, more troops, the discussion in the White House is now focused on whether, after eight years of war, the United States should vastly expand counterinsurgency efforts along the lines he has proposed -- which involve an intensive program to improve security and governance in key population centers -- or whether it should begin shifting its approach away from such initiatives and simply target leaders of terrorist groups who try to return to Afghanistan.

McChrystal's assessment, in the view of two senior administration officials, is just "one input" in the White House's decision-making process. The president, another senior administration official said, "has embarked on a very, very serious review of all options." The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal White House deliberations.

Obama, appearing on several Sunday-morning television news shows, left little doubt that key assumptions in the earlier White House strategy are now on the table. "The first question is: Are we doing the right thing?" the president said on CNN. "Are we pursuing the right strategy?"

"Until I'm satisfied that we've got the right strategy, I'm not going to be sending some young man or woman over there -- beyond what we already have," Obama said on NBC's "Meet the Press." If an expanded counterinsurgency strategy in Afghanistan contributes to the goal of defeating al-Qaeda, "then we'll move forward," he said. "But, if it doesn't, then I'm not interested in just being in Afghanistan for the sake of being in Afghanistan or saving face or . . . sending a message that America is here for the duration."



Open Thread

For a change of pace:

Christopher Hitchens on Why Women Aren't Funny. Alessandra Stanley on why Hitchens is wrong...again.



Mike's Blog Round Up

Informed Comment: Top Ten Myths about Iraq in 2007

Sisyphus Shrugged:..now that pandering to the evangelical right is temporarily off the table

Brad DeLong: How did Morgan Stanley lose that $9.4 billion anyway? It wasn't all analyists who missed the subprime mess - only the stupid, biased or corrupt ones did.

book forum: The U.S. is like Ike Turner

James Wolcott's Blog: The Goldberg Variations

OFF THE BEATEN PATH: Out Of Iraq Bloggers Caucus, Progressive Blog Digest, Argue With Everyone Political Forums, Drudge Retort



Hockey as an Iraq Metaphor

Raw Story:

U.S. President George Bush told the NHL champion Carolina Hurricanes Friday he likes to be "around people that keep expectations low," according to a UPI report Friday.

"Bush congratulated the 2005-06 Stanley Cup winners at the White House, noting the team was ranked 28 out of 30 at the beginning of last season," UPI said.

"I like to be around people that keep expectations low," Bush said. "Instead of listening to the prognosticators, this team had a 112-point season. They had 52 wins. They win the Stanley Cup. They're here at the White House. Congratulations to you."

Also attending the ceremony were former North Carolina Republican Sens. Elizabeth Dole and Richard Burr and Rep. Howard Coble, who was said to be sporting a championship hat.

"I thought you might be wearing that to cover up your bald head," Bush quipped.

If you read the full transcripts (available here), Bush also revealed that the Stanley Cup could hold 14 cans of beer.



Tookie Set to be executed

Jeralyn: "The Supreme Court has denied Stanley "Tookie" Williams request for a stay of execution. He will die at 12:01 am tonight...read on"

Petrelis Files: "Gov. Schwarzenegger has denied clemency to Stanley Tookie Williams and has his five-page statement...read on"

John Cole is against the death penalty, but has a hard time getting behind this case.

Atrios linked to the case of Cory Maye.



Write Your Own Caption

Flat Stanley hat tip to Greatscat



 Schiavo Appeal Rejected Again in Atlanta

By RON WORD . - With time running out for Terri Schiavo, a federal appeals court Wednesday rejected her parents' latest attempt to get the brain-damaged woman's feeding tube reconnected.

"Any further action by our court or the district court would be improper," Judge Stanley F. Birch Jr. wrote. "While the members of her family and the members of Congress have acted in a way that is both fervent and sincere, the time has come for dispassionate discharge of duty."

Birch went on to scold President Bush and Congress for their attempts to intervene in the judicial process, by saying: "In resolving the Schiavo controversy, it is my judgment that, despite sincere and altruistic motivation, the legislative and executive branches of our government have acted in a manner demonstrably at odds with our Founding Fathers' blueprint for the governance of a free people — our Constitution." read on

(update) Judge Birch was appointed by George H.W. Bush

Godspeed Terri.



Freedom and Liberty Bush Counter

Click here to download or play WMP

Here is the text for the entire speech.

Tom Shales from the Wapo gives us his thoughts.

ALESSANDRA STANLEY from the NY Times here.

Fred Barnes from the Weekly Standard here.



Media's cowing to attack dogs

by Stanley Crouch

Excerpt: The upshot is that too many who write editorial columns, who produce television news and who conceive of campaigns are considered outdated if they have principles.