ldzppln @ 1:

First.

Brilliant comment.

Missouri's new state motto: "Forward to the next century! 17th century, that is."

Abortion is NOT murder.

1. A fetus is NOT a child and a fetus is NOT a human being. It is a part of the female's body until it is carried to term and can live outside the human body. Until then, it is medically, little more than a parasite and it is a possession of that woman. If a lung or kidney or even a tonsil is brought out of a human being, it is a living human organism and will die outside the human body eventually. Letting a tonsil die is not murder. Removing a fetus is not murder either.

2. A woman's body is NOT the property of the superstitious dogma of obsolete objective moralists.

3. Life is NOT sacred. Human life is NOT sacred. If it was, hand guns and the death penalty would be illegal. Wars would definitely not be started by slacker conservatives looking for a way to feel macho while having other people shed other people's blood.

4. Human life does not start at conception. Human life starts, individually, as sperm and eggs - gametes which ARE alive, but are disposed of every month through menstrual cycles for females or either nocturnal emissions or masturbation for males. So any boy who has had a wet dream or any girl who has had more than one period is, by the pro-birth definition, a serial killer. Trailer trash likes to pretend human life begins at conception out of convenience for their argument only.

5. When animals don't want their young, they either abandon them or eat them.

Man, this country is one fucked up place.

Living on the West Coast, I forget how backward the midwest and south can be. This is a not so gentle reminder.

The Truth Hurts @ 8:

Man, this country is one fucked up place.

Living on the West Coast, I forget how backward the midwest and south can be. This is a not so gentle reminder.

Tell me about it.

I just said to my husband: I can't wait until this country falls apart so that we can know which side of the divide to live on. [currently, it's in a progressive bubble, south of the Mason-Dixon line].

Not to beat a dead horse (too late) but does anyone honestly think that a Democrat Governor would have signed this law?

After all of revelations about Republican dalliances, molestations, and other perversities acted out behind their hypocritical self righteous moralizing and pandering, I'm beginning to believe that the whole male dominated quasi religious anti choice movement is just another misogynistic sexual dominance play. It's another example of sexually repressed insecure white male deviancy masked as moral religious indignation. They not only hate gays, and people of color, they hate women as well. Hateful, mean spirited control freaks with some serious sexual problems. Keep your kids away from these freaks.

CD @ 7:

Gosh I wonder if atheists will use this to bash anyone who dares to think differently than them?

Because the believers NEVER do that.

BR,
You would not see this make it past the house floor of most states that are blue.

What a surprise. To illustrate just how serious this law is, I'm not sure I would even recommend challenging it in court. If it gets up to the U.S. Supremes, the notorious K-RATS wing could oh-so-easily use it as the next case to chip away at abortion rights until they are extinguished altogether.

Under current law, it is indeed Constitutional for a state to pass regulations about abortions, as long as they don't place undue burdens on obtaining them. It could be easily argued under precedent that this law places such an undue burden. However, one of the most famous "undue burdens" used to be the bans on the misnamed "partial birth abortions." As we all know, such laws no longer pose undue burdens.

What the Court will do, if it gets its hands on cases like these, is rule again and again that these kinds of restrictions do not place undue burdens on obtaining abortions, until the state of the law is such that abortion is de facto returned to the states. And they'll do it without overruling Roe.

~~~~~~~~~
CD @ 6:

Gosh I wonder if atheists will use this to bash anyone who dares to think differently than them?

Er, uh....no, I don't think we'll do that. I, however, just might criticize you for your inappropriate implication that all atheists are intolerant.

5. When animals don’t want their young, they either abandon them or eat them.

That's probably not the greatest talking point.

"Screw civilization: let's be like wolves! Pass me some grilled baby/fetus!"

I'm seeing a trend here. Repubs, dumb as dog shit. Dems, smarter than dog shitl Weee, I'm a dem.

Doggiebobo @ 25:

#8: So very, very true...and I live in Texas and we are not nearly as
backward or religiously restricted as apparently the people of Missouri
are. What a crock.signing into law a piece of shit that should be wiped
in the face of their Governor...and ALL who support such an aniquated
law. Man, I'd hate to live in Missouri who has now earned the right to
being called the most backward and stupid of ALL States.

BY THE WAY....AS I RECALL THE MOTO OF MISSOURI IS "THE SHOW ME STATE"
WELL I SAY IT IS THE "BLOW ME STATE"

Karen @ 22:

What a surprise. To illustrate just how serious this law is, I'm not sure I would even recommend challenging it in court. If it gets up to the U.S. Supremes, the notorious K-RATS wing could oh-so-easily use it as the next case to chip away at abortion rights until they are extinguished altogether.

Under current law, it is indeed Constitutional for a state to pass regulations about abortions, as long as they don't place undue burdens on obtaining them. It could be easily argued under precedent that this law places such an undue burden. However, one of the most famous "undue burdens" used to be the bans on the misnamed "partial birth abortions." As we all know, such laws no longer pose undue burdens.

What the Court will do, if it gets its hands on cases like these, is rule again and again that these kinds of restrictions do not place undue burdens on obtaining abortions, until the state of the law is such that abortion is de facto returned to the states. And they'll do it without overruling Roe.

~~~~~~~~~
CD @ 6:

Gosh I wonder if atheists will use this to bash anyone who dares to think differently than them?

Er, uh....no, I don't think we'll do that. I, however, just might criticize you for your inappropriate implication that all atheists are intolerant.

Golly gee no after all no atheist would ever do that.

I was a biology major in college, and guess what--humans aren't that special.

baby jesus did not authorize this
soon they too, like Kentucky will open a creation museum.

humans in/humans out...baby jesus doesn't care.

Wow....these idiots haven't learned a thing in the past year. This is part of the it. Restrictions. Americans do not want politicians putting restrictions on us.
That and sending us to war.

I would have slight sympathy for people like Blunt if the republicans would open an orphange for every family planning clinic they close.

But no, that might cost a buck, and, we know that republicans are "humane" as long as it dosen't cost anything. Those babies will just have to pull themselves up by their bootstraps! Don't you little bastards come begging around here.

Does this idiot gov. not remember the new Senator who got elected in Missouri last year because she's pro stem cell research?

Right right... worry about the unborn - but once they're here, then what? Send them to die in wars we shouldn't be involved in. Or perhaps if they're 'lucky' - they can become a wage-slave for life.

Prolife - the position of bullshit.

Joe,

Carefully read what I wrote.

"...Cross shaped lectern..."sounds like a Black Sabbath song title.Ha! There must be something in the ground water up there that makes them so,oh,I don't know...socially and politically retarded.
How they are sandbagging the pro life agenda with this bullshit (let's just rezone/remodel them out of business) is pathetic.
Having been part and parcil to an abortion as a teenager in Texas in the 70's,I can tell you this:neither one of us was prepared to be a parent,and had we been forced to be, the resulting spawn would have suffered as a result.Did I like the choice we made?No.Do I have my regrets?Yes.It was a hard choice to make,but it was the right one.And my son and 2 grand children (produced when I and he were ready to be parents)are proof that choice makes sense and all this right wing religio-prostelizing does not.
Blunt can piss off as far as I'm concerned.
Cross shaped lectern indeed.
On a lighter note: Do you know why baptists never make love standing up?
They're afraid people will think they're dancing.

Again, this is the kind of thing that universal health care would prevent--contraceptives for everyone, abortions for those with contraceptive failures, and maybe, just maybe, support for the new parent(s). Like in civilized countries.

Friar Tuck @ 47:

and,, um didint the USA start fresh from england to make sure it was kept serperate from CHURCH & STATE?!!!

Hear! Hear! Friar. Well said!

Another Joe @ 33:

The abortion debate aside,, The stats are amazing.

The following is a list of useful abortion statistics as well as some facts on abortifacients. All abortion numbers are derived from pro-abortion sources courtesy of The Alan Guttmacher Institute and Planned Parenthood's Family Planning Perspectives.

In America the Number of abortions per year is: 1.37 Million (1996), and the Number of abortions per day is: Approximately 3,700

Hey, thats a HUGE number 1 million 370 thousand abortions a year.

White women obtain 60% of all abortions.

Women with family incomes less than $15,000 obtain 28.7% of all abortions; Women with family incomes between $15,000 and $29,999 obtain 19.5%; Women with family incomes between $30,000 and $59,999 obtain 38.0%; Women with family incomes over $60,000 obtain 13.8%.

1% of all abortions occur because of rape or incest; 6% of abortions occur because of potential health problems regarding either the mother or child, and 93% of all abortions occur for social reasons (i.e. the child is unwanted or inconvenient).

Get that,,,93% of all abortions occur for social reasons (i.e. the child is unwanted or inconvenient).

Good reason for an abortion huh.

Well one thing for sure is this,, If white people keep getting abortions at this rate they will sooner than later become the minority race in the good ole US of K.
Maybe that's the plan.

The following is Pro-life sites
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/feb/060216A.html
http://www.abortionno.org/Resources/pictures.html

I choose life.
Go Ron Paul.

So your whole anti choice stance rests on racism. That is pathetic. I'm sick of white insecure males trying run everybody's lives.

They think Planned Parenthood is trying to profit from teaching safe sex:

Missouri Right to Life, which backed the measure, says groups such as Planned Parenthood have a conflict of interest in supplying materials for sex education courses, because they could potentially make money off female students who later visit their clinics.

My only memory of this armpit of a state is the Mcdonald's employee who served me my food who had cigarette burns covering both her arms. I asked for my mney back. A total shithole.

Another Joe @ 33:

Get that,,,93% of all abortions occur for social reasons (i.e. the child is unwanted or inconvenient).

Good reason for an abortion huh.

Personal bias: Without considering whether a foetus' status changes when it can (at least theoretically) live apart from its mother, I think that a foetus at any stage is at least a potential human being. As such, I am uncomfortable with the idea of abortion as contraception.

That said, the US should have the ability to make almost every pregnancy an planned and wanted pregnancy (other than incest/rape, etc.). This would be accomplished by (1) mandatory sex ed in all schools, (2) free condom distribution in all schools and other relevant venues (raves etc.), (3) government funded research for more and better contraceptive treatments (4) govenment funded Norplant injections or other treatment.

Instead, the same party which wants to outlaw abortion also wants to maximixe the likelihood of unwanted pregnancy by keeping children and teens ignorant and by limiting access to safe, effective birth control. Once the inevitable happens (teen pregnancy, single motherhood, etc. - both of which, I believe, have increased under Bush), religious and social conservatives then effectively want to punish the mothers and their children for their immorality.

At its root, this is just one set of the American people attempting to impose its own moral convictions on another set. (For many religious conservatives, allowing others to live a "permissive" lifestyle is, in itself, immoral. In other words, tolerance is immoral).

This is not a divide that can be overcome with reason, only numbers. We need a Democratic President and both houses so we can stack the Supreme Court with justices who have no interest in overturning Roe v. Wade.

Another Joe @ 33:

Get that,,,93% of all abortions occur for social reasons (i.e. the child is unwanted or inconvenient)

"Social reasons" are not defined as unwanted or inconvenient. That is a small subset, and it applies mainly to teenage pregnancies and divorcing families. If you check the non-partisan gov't reports, the main reason given is lack of finances. The family can't afford to bring another child into the world. $60,000 may sound like a lot of money to earn but if you already have four children, and there are two adults, you're at the poverty level, which is $10,000/year or less per person.

Shouldn't the location of signing void the bill?

OK: Here is my free gift to the Christo Fascist Wing Nuts.

A free bumper sticker. My gift to you. Go ahead and have them printed and attach them to all your cars. No need to thank me. You are most welcome.

CONTRACEPTION PREVENTS ABORTIONS

....

A "potential" human being does not a human being make. Carl Sagan had a wonderful essay in Parade magazine many years ago--when it wasn't written for morons--saying that taken to its logical conclusions, both nocturnal emissions and menstruation destroyed that potential life.

Oh Carl, we miss you so much.

And who the hell said that abortions were for contraception?

WHO HAS ABORTIONS
Fifty-two percent of U.S. women obtaining abortions are younger than 25: Women aged 20–24 obtain 33% of all abortions, and teenagers obtain 19%.[6]

Black women are almost four times as likely as white women to have an abortion, and Hispanic women are 2.5 times as likely.[7]

Forty-three percent of women obtaining abortions identify themselves as Protestant, and 27% as Catholic.[8]

Two-thirds of all abortions are among never-married women.[9]

Over 60% of abortions are among women who have had one or more children.[10]

The abortion rate among women living below the federal poverty level ($9,570 for a single woman with no children) is more than four times that of women above 300% of the poverty level (44 vs. 10 abortions per 1,000 women).[11]*

On average, women give four reasons for choosing abortion. Three-fourths of women cite concern for or responsibility to other individuals; three-fourths say they cannot afford a child; three-fourths say that having a baby would interfere with work, school or the ability to care for dependents; and half say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner.[12]

The Guttmacher Institute

BTW the average age of the father of an unwed teenage mother's child is 31.

Angry One @ 5:

In 2005, PBS documented similar laws in Mississippi.

Constantly testing the "undue burden" standard introduced by the Supreme Court in its 1992 Casey ruling, Mississippi has enacted a series of restrictions on access to abortion. Starting with rigid parental consent rules, the state added steep new barriers to abortion access, including requirements that abortion doctors must have admitting privileges at local hospitals. Starting in 2006, facilities performing second and third trimester procedures must meet the same regulatory standards as full surgical hospitals, 36 pages of rules in all. As a result, the entire state of Mississippi, one of the poorest in the nation, now has only a single abortion clinic, the Jacksonboro Women's Health Clinic.
For more details, see:
"The Last Abortion Clinic."

Only one single abortion clinic? Now THAT is an undue burden.

hadenuf @ 63:

And who the hell said that abortions were for contraception?

I did. See post 55 above. Not all or necessarily even most or many abortions, mind you, but some abortions are definitely used for contraception.

Doing this in a church means that the state of Missour considers creating life a religious act, and it might as well, because that makes this law a blatant violation of the first amendment.

Oh. Wait. We dont have rights anymore in this country, just values.

Women don't abort because their clothes don't fit. It's a lot more complicated than "contraception".

hareli @ 70:

Zenrage @ 6:

How do these people know when Soul enters the body?

The belief that the soul enters when the egg is fertilized (popular with certain religious conservatives) does not take into account the fact that a fertilized egg can subsequently split into twins. Twins can later recombine into one. Does this mean that there is "vanishing soul syndrome"?

I'm not sure, but I think Catholic teaching has accepted that the soul does not enter the body at the moment of fertilization because of these types of scientific findings.

What does Blunt care?

If you're a rich, white, Republican politician like Matt Blunt (or David Vitter), you can certainly afford to fly your prostitutes (or your daughter) to a state that performs abortions, to avoid any unwelcome attention.

This isn't about "saving lives." It's about destroying poor lives.

And certainly, keeping people in the dark as to what sex is and how it works isn't going to help prevent unnecessary pregnancies.

This guy is a dummkopf.

These fanatics think that they are so above the laws they want to force the rest of us to live by that they see no conflict of interest in signing legislation using a Christian church as a backdrop.

There are times I miss the easy-going neighborliness of the Midwest. Then stuff like this shocks me back to reality and I'm grateful I made the choice to move to the Pacific Northwest. Now if we could just ship Rev. Ken Hutcherson somewhere else.

Flash @ 68:

Now you know why I don't live in Missouri.

I ran away from Denver 35 years ago and moved to Mo for health reasons. Now I wish I had stayed there and died. Even though I was ill, I was at least happy in Colorado - but not here in Mo.

Yeah that is how laws are made. You get enough jerk offs to agree with your point of view and it goes on the books. Must mean that there is a whole state full of jerk offs there electing other jerk offs to put these laws on the books for them. The same people who marry cousins and chase sheep in their spare time. Oh but they are good christians and go to church regularly. When is religion going to end please. Humans don't seem to know how to use it even with an operators manual (bible).

33 Another Joe: It's extremely convenient for the women of the species to bear the children for the entire race.

If you've ever had sex ONE TIME and not been willing to become pregnant and raise the child yourself, then you're a flaming hypocrite. U are anyway!

And another thing--life started a long time ago, and it's not likely to end unless we humans kill ourselves off by our own stupidity, i.e., polluting the environment till we die from it.

Has that church still got its tax exempt status? Someone better check.

Now we can sit back and watch the number of unwanted pregnancies rise in Missouri. Hope this shows ya, Missouri.

I pray to the Heavenly Father above that his name comes up on the madam's list.
It would be of no surprise.

From a cross-shaped lectern, eh? Rather Blunt of this asshat, eh?

Salmineo:

Ahem. From Thomas Paine's The Age of Reason -- my favorite book of all time:

Soon after I had published the pamphlet COMMON SENSE, in America, I
saw the exceeding probability that a revolution in the system of
government would be followed by a revolution in the system of
religion. The adulterous connection of church and state, wherever it
had taken place, whether Jewish, Christian, or Turkish, had so
effectually prohibited, by pains and penalties, every discussion upon
established creeds, and upon first principles of religion, that until
the system of government should be changed, those subjects could not
be brought fairly and openly before the world; but that whenever this
should be done, a revolution in the system of religion would follow.
Human inventions and priest-craft would be detected; and man would
return to the pure, unmixed, and unadulterated belief of one God, and
no more.

Over the past 10,000 years, various freethinkers, Deists, agnostics, skeptics, atheists, antitheists, Subgenii and other otherwise sensible people have predicted the demise of religion, simply because they were naive enough to think that reason would ever triumph over raw, galloping, dumb-ass human nature.

CD: Gosh I wonder if atheists will use this to bash anyone who dares to think differently than them?

Would you consider honest, forthright, probing questions to be "bashing"? What if they were all asked within an implied cosmology of reason and testability?

The worst thing I have to say about most of the Christians I've met face-to-face is that, if the environment allowed for deep questions to be asked, the answers inevitably were deeply unsatisfying. Is that my fault? Am I supposed to find Jesus by lowering my standards of what's real and what makes sense? Is this "bashing"?

CD @ 27:

MargeAggedon @ 18:

CD @ 7:

Gosh I wonder if atheists will use this to bash anyone who dares to think differently than them?

Because the believers NEVER do that.

After all logic dictates that two wrong makes a right.

Works both ways is all I'm saying.

Bingo @ 49:

Fuck, fucking christians. Athiests may be assholes but at least we aren't stupid. Enough w/ the jesus fairytale dictating policy here.

Atheists are NOT assholes.
HUMANS are assholes!
And for the most part dumber than dogshit.

what a bunch of fucking freaks...

adding to the myth of the flyover state(s)... go figure

93% of all abortions occur for social reasons (i.e. the child is unwanted or inconvenient.

The number one reason should be "For reasons that are none of your damn business."

Oh, and isn't Ron Paul a "libertarian"? And if that's really the case, he'd be pro-choice, right?

So much for consistency.

Thank you for an honest headline that says "anti-choice". I'm getting weary of complaining when liberal blogs use right wing language, this is refreshing that you didn't.

What a steaming load from a "religious" phony and hypocrite. The net effect of this will actually be hasten the demise of these simpletons. Quaker Dave is right, this is about power--not spirituality--of which this is a seriously perverted and arrogant form. And how these psychotic whackjobs are eventually going to lose their sorry ass next year.

Ryan @ 111:

Good for MO. I wish we could get that passed in my state.

Spoken like a misogynist with outdoor plumbing. Grow a uterus, and I might consider your opinion. (But not likely.)

Better yet, come volunteer a few shifts with me in a public health clinic, where I actually render care to those kids you demand be born, but don't want to fund services for. Hold their little arms while I puncture their veins to draw blood to test for lead because they live in substandard housing.

better yet, STFU. Just because you have freedom of speech doesn't mean you have anything to say worth hearing.

I guess it doesn't dawn on these fundie GOPs that not all people are narrow minded baptists, nor do we all believe that a blastocyte is a life. I sure as hell don't.

So nice of him to push women's health issues back into the dark ages.

Yeah, so much for separation of church and state.

Guys like this are clearly going for a symbolic "screw you" to the whole principle.

Let's hope Margaret Atwood wasn't too prophetic with The Handmaid's Tale.

Robert S. @ 118:

Yeah, so much for separation of church and state.

Guys like this are clearly going for a symbolic "screw you" to the whole principle.

When are these religious freaks going to realize that in order to establish freedom of religion, one must fight establish freedom from religion.

Ass backwards ... Kompassionate Konservative Kristians . . .

.

"When facism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross."
Sinclair Lewis quotes (American Writer, 1885-1951)

Heil Bu$h

.

Hey everyone,
Look on the bright side. At least clothes hanger sales will go up in Missouri!

Karen @ 22:

~~~~~~~~~
CD @ 6:

Gosh I wonder if atheists will use this to bash anyone who dares to think differently than them?

Er, uh....no, I don't think we'll do that. I, however, just might criticize you for your inappropriate implication that all atheists are intolerant.

CD has a habit of grouping ALL atheists together in a bunch like that Karen. He did it constantly at a message board he was banned from not long ago and on top of that he's a homophobe as well.

Is there anything in Missouri? It strikes me as a bible-thumper wasteland. But that describes most of the central and southern US, doesn't it? Why would anyone live there?

So pro lifers just f*^#k women who need help ...
Young women who are scared and upset the hell with them right ...
Just spit in there face....
Pro life what life you pigs have made for Our women ....
thanks for the life you made.................................................................
for women who need help

Most of the people who came to this continent did so to get away from royalty. They were tired of being serfs and laborers for no pay. They did not have a lot of money or possessions. Later on after the place was partly settled some of the rich pricks came over too. They like having serfs for no wages. Because there weren't any they imported slaves. A lot of them settled in the south. It takes a certain mentality to want to own a human or not pay them for their effort. For a while they were called southern democrats but switched over and took the republican party. This is who we have today. They do not believe the masses have any rights or freedoms. Their ideas of how things are run or what is legal are all that counts. This is not surprising because they did the same thing for many generations in Europe. It is a way of life for them. The part that amazes me is the number of willing serfs that they have and the thing the serfs use to justify this serfdom is religion. Wake the hell up serfs. Do they invite you to their homes or their country clubs?Do you get any of the pie? No but you get a lot of bible salesman. Why would you want to live like this when all you have is a fear of going to hell.

Living in Missouri, the real surprise is that our Boy Wonder Governor did not sign the legislation in the St. Louis Catholic Cathedral.

Oh, yea, I forgot that he has a tough reeelection next year and that he has to appeal to the yahoo base in rural Missouri. A broad cross section of Catholics in St. Louis think that the position of the Bishop and their church on most issues is BS.

Despite all evidence to the contrary, there are progressives in Missouri who are attempting to keep the flame of freedom, justice, equality, and common sense alive. As Norman Mailer said almost 40 years ago:

Put your fingers in a V for victory and give a wink. We yet may win, the others are so stupid. Heaven help us when we do.

Any guy who wants to take women's reproductive rights away, is a pussy! Men would never think twice if they were able to get pregnant about having to get an abortion. These people are so fucking dumb. It's one thing to be against it personally, that's what choice is, but it's another to make it illegal. What's next, burkas?

I just cannot get my head around the idea of signing law in a church! Outrageous.

I believe that 1) if you have a penis, you have no say in whether or not a woman has a choice in this matter, and 2) if you have not adopted as many children as you can afford, you have no say in whether or not a woman has a choice in this matter.

The Christian Taliban is alive and well in the USA.

klunk @ 129:

Bob Roberts @ 72:

hadenuf @ 63:

And who the hell said that abortions were for contraception?

I did. See post 55 above. Not all or necessarily even most or many abortions, mind you, but some abortions are definitely used for contraception.

i see... so for you, having a metal instrument shoved up inside your body to scrape out tissue is an experience equitable to wearing a condom during intercourse?... Do you believe that it's just as convenient and safe a procedure resulting in no physical or psychological trauma? You must believe that the decision to undergo such a procedure is as spontaneous and inconsequential an act as inserting an IUD.

Nope. Never said or wrote anything you've just accused me of. I know d&cs are incredibily unpleasant experiences. I just chose to let people know in my first post (#56) what my bias was before I gave my opinion. You should perhaps read that post before you assume we're on opposite sides.

I did say that some abortions are used as a means of brith control. Sure using a condom or Norplant or an IUD would be safer and more pleasant. That does not mean that some women (for a number of different reasons) neglect birth control until too late and then get abortions. There are records of women having multiple abortions rather than use other forms of contraception.

Since it looks like I have to spell it out for you, while I am not comfortable with the idea of abortion, I am pro-choice.

Seems like Repugs should be signing laws in brothels.

Straight or gay, it's all good people!

Zenrage @ 6:

Abortion is NOT murder.

4. Human life does not start at conception. Human life starts, individually, as sperm and eggs - gametes which ARE alive, but are disposed of every month through menstrual cycles for females or either nocturnal emissions or masturbation for males.

OMG, I'm a mass murderer!

Hope them folks at Nuremburg or the World's Court don't hear of this.

I pray for real biblical persecution for all these right-wing bastards!

Missouri Governor Signs Anti-Choice Bill From Sanctuary Of Baptist Church

Gov. Matt Blunt signed legislation Friday placing more abortion clinics under government oversight by classifying them as ambulatory surgical centers. Planned Parenthood claimed the law, HB 1055, could force it to spend up to $2 million to remodel one ...