Right on Bill!

The right doesn't like it when the tables are turned, the babies...

Venting that anger? Isn't that rather dismissive.
Outburst? what outburst? he was controlled and told the truth
What a democrat can't be visably angry?

And his wife's vote was what?

hey at least bill clinton is not afraid to say it like it is.............. If you guys are too afraid to say anything then some one has to

14All @ 7:

Notice they didn't comment at all on whether what he said was true. That just wouldn't do. Instead they discuss his "feisty" nature. Puh-leez. The public is growing tired of this bullshit.

I noticed that. Once again talk about the messenger and not the message....

I caught this this morning. God I miss this man as president.

I sure miss Bill.

hadenuf @ 5:

And his wife's vote was what?

Hillary actually voted against the condemnation of the ad.

Daniel Ellsberg--who I greatly admire--has just realized that "a coup has occurred".
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/ellsberg.php?articleid=11674

When will anyone in congress notice?

He excels in his job as the hatchet man for his party too. Is there nothing he doesn't do well?

Look Mommy! A Clinton who speaks for the rest of us, er USA. Now where is/was his wife?

Bill Clinton, 1998:

"Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq’s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors."

Bill Clinton is a pathological liar, as are all Democrats.

Golly, I wish he'd get all testy over the killing of our troops in Iraq but, after all these years, it's an ad the gets him mad.

Eight more years of BS?

cetylovx @ 2:

Kind of late! Could have said this before Congress and the cowardly Dems went along with the useless condemnation thus leading the fight-back against the fained outrage. Lame.

It is not actually a bad idea to let your oponents go overboard before commenting. There really was not all that much to say a week ago when the Republicans were in a snit, now there is much more to say.

These people - the neocons, the right wing attack machine - have been waiting for somebody on the left - a liberal - to use the “Betray us” line. Using “Betray us” was an obvious (sophomoric) play on words for the General that even the smallest mind would come up with. The Roves of the Republican party knew somebody would use the “Betray us” comment. They were very lucky that MoveOn used it and the right wing have been waiting. They had all the talking points just waiting. They have been planning since the surge started when Petraeus was named. Who didn’t think “Betray us” when they heard the name Petraeus? Of course somebody was going to use the “Betray us” line. The ad was not that bad but these assholes were ready as if it was the worst thing that anybody could ever do. They were ready to pounce. The left or the liberals or the progressives (whatever you want to call us) should have pushed back and pushed back hard. It’s nice to see that Pres. Bill is doing it.

The points remain undisgusted.

Why is the Petraeus/Crocker report differing so greatly from the NIE, the GAO and 14 intelligence agencies of our own?

"these are the people that ran a television ad in Georgia with Max Cleland, who lost half his body in Vietnam, in the same ad with Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. That’s what Republicans do. And the person that rode into the Senate on that ad was there voting to condemn the Democrats over the Petraeus ad."

Which senator is this?

(NB: Saxby Chambliss of Georgia)

Heliogabalus @ 27:

The problem for the Democratic party is credibility & integrity, they are as dirty and corrupted as the republicans, Partners in crime. The only individual, Dennis Kucinich, who hasn't been complicit with the neo-con republican reign of utter corruption & deception is the candidate who doesn't have the slightest chance. Talk about perspicacity.....

Yes, yes. Kucinich is wonderful. Bluebirds follow him around singing a joyous song as unicorns prance under rainbows. Acknowledged. Unfortunately the rest of us shitty people live and work on the other side of the looking glass, Alice.

Big Bill Speaks!

After setting the table for the phuKKKing neocons and staying silent for 6 years, this corporatist piece of schitt want to pontificate?
He's only doing it for Hillary. I am not fooled.

ChrisM70 @ 25:

Clinton needs to be giving this message to the spineless Democrats in Congress.

Amen, Brother!

PurplePatriot @ 29:

DFAL @ 22:

Bill Clinton, 1998:

"Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq’s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors."

Bill Clinton is a pathological liar, as are all Democrats.

{sniff} {sniff} Is that a flame war I smell? Difference is ... Clinton didn't order a strike that lasted 4 years, has cost over 3000 lives of American servicemen and women. It's widely accepted that intelligence on weapons has been faulty for years. However, GWB exploited 9/11, used cartoons for Colin Powell's UN presentation, etc. Screw you.

And Clinton's vice president wasn't against the war before he was for it so once he became vice president he would be in a position to lie the nation into war and then could steer no bid government contracts to is former company.

BushCo are lying scum traitors. You can't even begin to compare Clinton and the Democrats to them.

At least during Clinton a highly experienced professional workforce veteran with a degree or two had a choice between being a department manager at Best Buy or Circuit City.

BaScOmBe @ 39:

PurplePatriot @ 34:

Heliogabalus @ 27:

The problem for the Democratic party is credibility & integrity, they are as dirty and corrupted as the republicans, Partners in crime. The only individual, Dennis Kucinich, who hasn't been complicit with the neo-con republican reign of utter corruption & deception is the candidate who doesn't have the slightest chance. Talk about perspicacity.....

Yes, yes. Kucinich is wonderful. Bluebirds follow him around singing a joyous song as unicorns prance under rainbows. Acknowledged. Unfortunately the rest of us shitty people live and work on the other side of the looking glass, Alice.

you doing another "take what you can get' rant? or are you just gearing up for it?

I'm not about to start a rant when you're listening in. I've got no ammunition against you ... you're just too right on 100% of the time. There's just no fooling you.

No, this isn't a "fascinating debate". It's all theater, and bad theater at that.

PurplePatriot @ 44:

BaScOmBe @ 39:

PurplePatriot @ 34:

Heliogabalus @ 27:

Yes, yes. Kucinich is wonderful. Bluebirds follow him around singing a joyous song as unicorns prance under rainbows. Acknowledged. Unfortunately the rest of us shitty people live and work on the other side of the looking glass, Alice.

you doing another "take what you can get' rant? or are you just gearing up for it?

I'm not about to start a rant when you're listening in. I've got no ammunition against you ... you're just too right on 100% of the time. There's just no fooling you.

Or anybody else, for that matter.

I'm ticked off that there aren't any visible Democrats pointing out the substance of the ad, rather than the 'outrage' from the GOP. It's gotten to the point that El Chimpo Grande was able to slide that in as the last question in his 'news conference' and no one noticed a guy who glossed over his entire last year of duty is standing in judgment of others.

And now, we have Hillabamawards all saying they can't guarantee complete troop withdrawal before 2013. Makes the 2006 'the American people elected us to get us out of Iraq' kind of a joke, and a bad one at that.

So a Dem win in 08 and people think we'll be leaving Iraq huh?

Funny

Ruthless People @ 53:

E Ryno @ 43:

The Clintons are different than the Bushes but they swim in the same tank. We just look in.

Well, we know they ride in the same golf cart. You see Bush 41 riding around with Bill Clinton more than you do his own sons. I must admit, that gives me pause too.

I actually think that it makes Bush 41 seem much more intelligent.

A fish tank in a golf cart? Doesn't sound prudent...

He brought up an excellent point about that race between Chambliss and Cleland. Funny, Cleland actually was in favor of DHS and pushed early on for it, but had to veto it because it did not give those employees the same job protection as all other federal employees - and he gets labeled unpatriotic. Nice!

Themesong for the Kucinch supporters:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKh86kOoiWQ

Last time we voted for a new marshall to clean up Washington we got Carter, and his was a real successful administration wasn' it.

Ricky Bones @ 58:

He brought up an excellent point about that race between Chambliss and Cleland. Funny, Cleland actually was in favor of DHS and pushed early on for it, but had to veto it because it did not give those employees the same job protection as all other federal employees - and he gets labeled unpatriotic. Nice!

Even worse, Coulter discredits his injuries and claims he was some drunk that was screwing around and that he didn't truly earn the Purple Heart.

Ruthless People @ 53:

E Ryno @ 43:

The Clintons are different than the Bushes but they swim in the same tank. We just look in.

Well, we know they ride in the same golf cart. You see Bush 41 riding around with Bill Clinton more than you do his own sons. I must admit, that gives me pause too.

I've read that's because Clinton is more well mannered than georgie or jeb.

Who beyond hillbillies name their kids jeb?

Annoyed Canuck @ 55:

So the point of the story becomes: "Whoa, Bill Clinton has anger issues!! He's a mad dog! This is great for Republicans!"

Never mind the substance of what Clinton actually said. Never mind the very good point he made, that Max Cleland and John Kerry were ruthlessly slandered by the same people who voted the motion against MoveOn.org.

Fucking bullshit. The media is completely broken.

This is why many more Dems and/or Liberals should come out as indignant as Bill.

BaScOmBe @ 36:

Big Bill Speaks!

After setting the table for the phuKKKing neocons and staying silent for 6 years, this corporatist piece of schitt want to pontificate?
He's only doing it for Hillary. I am not fooled.

Of course he's doing it for Hillary but it doesn't mean what he's saying isn't true and doesn't need to be said. And who says Bill's been silent for 6 years? Just because he's not on C&L video every week doesn't mean he's silent. Even so, for lack of better phrasing, you often have to side with the lesser of two evils. And Bill Clinton is far, far lesser evil than BushCo and the GOP

ysbaddaden @ 64:

Ruthless People @ 53:

E Ryno @ 43:

The Clintons are different than the Bushes but they swim in the same tank. We just look in.

Well, we know they ride in the same golf cart. You see Bush 41 riding around with Bill Clinton more than you do his own sons. I must admit, that gives me pause too.

I've read that's because Clinton is more well mannered than georgie or jeb.

Who beyond hillbillies name their kids jeb?

James Ewell Brown Stuart (February 6, 1833 – May 12, 1864) was an American soldier from Virginia and a Confederate States Army general during the American Civil War. He was known to his friends as "Jeb".

Jeb Stuart Magruder (born November 5, 1934, New York City) was the second official in the administration of President Richard Nixon (the first was Fred LaRue) to plead guilty to charges of involvement in events leading to the Watergate first break-in and the subsequent Watergate scandal.

Juba @ 61:

PurplePatriot @ 34:

Heliogabalus @ 27:

The problem for the Democratic party is credibility & integrity, they are as dirty and corrupted as the republicans, Partners in crime. The only individual, Dennis Kucinich, who hasn't been complicit with the neo-con republican reign of utter corruption & deception is the candidate who doesn't have the slightest chance. Talk about perspicacity.....

Yes, yes. Kucinich is wonderful. Bluebirds follow him around singing a joyous song as unicorns prance under rainbows. Acknowledged. Unfortunately the rest of us shitty people live and work on the other side of the looking glass, Alice.

Patriot, give it a rest. Not everyone gets off on the Clintons like you do.

I'm sure I'm not the only one who is sick of your flame baiting comments.

What is it about the primary process you don't understand? Just because you're a pragmatic DLC enabler doesn't mean everyone else has to be one. God forbid, some of us actually try and vote for people who believe in progressive values.

This liberal Democrat likes Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich and Mike Ravel.

PurplePatriot @ 54:

Ruthless People @ 53:

E Ryno @ 43:

The Clintons are different than the Bushes but they swim in the same tank. We just look in.

Well, we know they ride in the same golf cart. You see Bush 41 riding around with Bill Clinton more than you do his own sons. I must admit, that gives me pause too.

I actually think that it makes Bush 41 seem much more intelligent.

Little doubt he's more intelligent than Bush 43, and would probably rather have Bill for a son than Bush 41, but still......

There is no reason to get all happy because Hillary is a liberal or that Bill is a liberal because they are not. They are middle of the road Democrats. Centrists. I would be curious what a neocon would say if you asked them what they don’t like about Hillary. What would Bill Kristal say? They just do not like the Clintons because they are one of “them”. Clinton was never a radical left wing liberal. And neither is Hill.

PurplePatriot @ 37:

JohnnyThief @ 32:

"these are the people that ran a television ad in Georgia with Max Cleland, who lost half his body in Vietnam, in the same ad with Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. That’s what Republicans do. And the person that rode into the Senate on that ad was there voting to condemn the Democrats over the Petraeus ad."

Which senator is this?

Yes. An excellent point. Ideally, I would have loved to see every democrat in the senate say the same thing.

Chambliss?

L.A. Confidential @ 75:

Well. I think both the Cons and the Dems are playing us for suckers at this point.

End Story

Agreed. One of them wants to keep taking our money. The other wants our money and Armageddon.

It would be so nice to have him back in the White House!

PurplePatriot @ 78:

E Ryno @ 72:

Juba @ 61:

PurplePatriot @ 34:

Patriot, give it a rest. Not everyone gets off on the Clintons like you do.

I'm sure I'm not the only one who is sick of your flame baiting comments.

What is it about the primary process you don't understand? Just because you're a pragmatic DLC enabler doesn't mean everyone else has to be one. God forbid, some of us actually try and vote for people who believe in progressive values.

This liberal Democrat likes Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich and Mike Ravel.

Tell us more about Ravel ... haven't heard of him. I'd love to hear about a new face. And Ron Paul? Wow. You must be in favor of every single private entity being able to do just about any unregulated damn thing they please.

Ravel was a composer of classical music, wasn't he?

"Jeb" Bush is a nickname of his initials. john Ellis Bush.
Not that I give a sh*t.

Say what you will about President Clinton, the man is very intelligent and he can speak well without reading every damned word some speech writer wrote for him. He is absolutely right about the Petraeus crap. The repubs and some dems used MoveOn's ad as a red herring to take the focus off the fact that the damned war is still a bloody fu*king disaster and nothing is improving no matter what bs Petraeus said.

If you do a little research you will find that Hillary is just the new smiley face for the global rich man's club. I don't judge her for this, maybe its impossible to get to where she is without making certain arrangements. That being said, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Our country's material prosperity is based upon our association with the western empire and its strangle hold on the world's resources. This has lasted several hundred years and is unraveling before our eyes as the greatest army in the world is defeated by road side bombs.

In past mythology, the dragon guarded his stash of gold and virgins, neither of which were of any use to him (Joseph Cambell)

PurplePatriot @ 78:

E Ryno @ 72:

Juba @ 61:

PurplePatriot @ 34:

Patriot, give it a rest. Not everyone gets off on the Clintons like you do.

I'm sure I'm not the only one who is sick of your flame baiting comments.

What is it about the primary process you don't understand? Just because you're a pragmatic DLC enabler doesn't mean everyone else has to be one. God forbid, some of us actually try and vote for people who believe in progressive values.

This liberal Democrat likes Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich and Mike Ravel.

Tell us more about Ravel ... haven't heard of him. I'd love to hear about a new face. And Ron Paul? Wow. You must be in favor of every single private entity being able to do just about any unregulated damn thing they please.

Strawman argument - I'm supporting people with souls - its a low bar I know - but that's my criteria

Oh. lordy:

Bill Clinton, 1998:

“Earlier today, I ordered America’s armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq’s nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.”

Okay, let's explain this again:

Before 1998, Saddam had WMD programs.

In 1998, Clinton bombed them out of existence.

After 1998, Saddam did not have WMD programs because they had been destroyed.

This is something we call "linear time." It's actually pretty straightforward.

Otay @ 90:

Biill, worry about your wife first. Why the hell is she feeding the Repug machine? Tell her to vote no on anything to Repugs proffer to congress.

That's not really a great approach to anything. I am going to oppose something just because a Republican is for it? No, thanks.

these examples of hypocrisy bill uses here, the attacks on cleland and kerry, are examples of the power of the the talk radio monopoly- the invisible body blows that made the rove career. those swiftboat campaigns, and the moveon swiftboating, would have been exposed for their hypocrisy if not for the uncontested repetition only the TR monopoly can provide.

we do have a corporatized media but the hypohypocrisy and denial the GOP has been using to destroy democracy with would not have been possible without that synchronized uncontested repetition all day and week and month to tens of millions.

our lazy MSM talking heads still ride the limbaugh/hannity bandwagon all over us. the only reason the producers of the PBS lehrer newshour can have a gwynn ifill political panel talking about the edwards haircut as a defining characteristic of his campaign with straight faces is that the TR repetition catapulted it into the mainsteam weeks before.

the kerry swiftboating was primarily a national talk radio campaign before it could go anywhere into the MSM (except fox etc). GOP blowhard chickenhawks with giant microphones all over the country, nationally and locally, made the swiftboaters rich and famous and kept them busy for many months. the 'minutemen' got started that way.

Dems need to post transcripts of the major TR blowhards and respond directly and immediately to their distortions, lies, and swiftboating by waving signs and boycotting LOCAL talk radio stations that fill their local airwaves with the crap and candidates need to start wearing the attacks as a badge of honor on their websites and ads, refering to the limbaugh's and hannitys by name.

until then bill can get clips posted on blogs but progressives will keep taking political body blows and wonder what hit them afterwards.

Fools on the Hill @ 24:

Golly, I wish he'd get all testy over the killing of our troops in Iraq but, after all these years, it's an ad the gets him mad.

Eight more years of BS?

NO, see... this is what happens, people lose track of what's really going on. He's not upset about the ad (although he probably is and should be) he's upset about the GOP acting like "OMG! How dare those Dems attack one of our Generals!"

He's pissed about the hypocrisy. Remember his economy slogan...?
It's the hypocrisy, stupid!

"Venting his anger"? "An outburst like that"?
I didn't get that he was particularly angry. Just disgusted and dead serious.

And John King's remark that Clinton has "a L-O-N-G memory as he recites those ads" suggesting that Clinton can't move on... I guess anything past a year (a week?) is now considered to be a L-O-N-G time ago and not worth citing.

God, I hate the mainstream news.

Fanon @ 95:

Otay @ 90:

Biill, worry about your wife first. Why the hell is she feeding the Repug machine? Tell her to vote no on anything to Repugs proffer to congress.

That's not really a great approach to anything. I am going to oppose something just because a Republican is for it? No, thanks.

No, not because a Repug is for it, but because a Repug brings it to congress. Dems (and strong Dems, not pussy Dems) should be writing all of the legislation.

Otay @ 103:

Fanon @ 95:

Otay @ 90:

Biill, worry about your wife first. Why the hell is she feeding the Repug machine? Tell her to vote no on anything to Repugs proffer to congress.

That's not really a great approach to anything. I am going to oppose something just because a Republican is for it? No, thanks.

No, not because a Repug is for it, but because a Repug brings it to congress. Dems (and strong Dems, not pussy Dems) should be writing all of the legislation.

That's not how the system works. Our Founding Fathers intended Congress to be Enlightened, which means ration men (or persons) of sound character can work out their differences to a common good. Some like Washington wanted to avoid party politics, although it cropped up even while he was in office between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, and those who wanted to support the French Revolution, and those that opposed it.

Saxby Chambliss is the senator who Clinton refers to who defeated Cleland with the help of the Israeli lobby.

Sam Fox is the Swift Boater who was appointed ambassador to Belgium.

"A co-founder of the Home Depot, Bernard Marcus, led an effort to swing Georgia's Jewish vote behind Mr. Chambliss, an unswerving ally of Israel in his four terms in Congress.

Even the Veterans of Foreign Wars endorsed Mr. Chambliss, not a veteran, over Mr. Cleland, once head of the Veterans Administration and winner of the Silver Star.

The race quickly shaped into a battle for the suburbs. Mr. Cleland, who won his first Senate term in 1996 by a scant 30,000 votes, ran strongly in the cities, while Mr. Chambliss, a friend to gun owners and an ardent foe of abortion, won handily in rural Georgia."

America is the terrorist. Not Iraq, Iran Afghanistan, Pakistan or Somalia....all nations currently being bombed or recently bombed by the U.S.

America is a fascist nation and it's people are the dumbest form of life that Earth has to offer.

The "liberal" websites like Daily Kos, Booman and inhabited by ex CIA (Including Markos Moulitsas) posters some of whom are pro torture (Larry Johnson).

It is disgusting to have to read the comments of liberals who are in effect for staying in Iraq under the guise of "planned withdrawal" instead of immediate withdrawal.

America is a disgusting nation. A shameful place to live. A disgrace to all humanity.

Is this the Cleland ad?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=tKFYpd0q9nE

JohnnyThief @ 32:

"these are the people that ran a television ad in Georgia with Max Cleland, who lost half his body in Vietnam, in the same ad with Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein. That’s what Republicans do. And the person that rode into the Senate on that ad was there voting to condemn the Democrats over the Petraeus ad."

Which senator is this?

Saxby Chambliss (R), US Senator, Georgia

GonzoD @ 83:

PurplePatriot @ 78:

E Ryno @ 72:

Juba @ 61:

This liberal Democrat likes Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich and Mike Ravel.

Tell us more about Ravel ... haven't heard of him. I'd love to hear about a new face. And Ron Paul? Wow. You must be in favor of every single private entity being able to do just about any unregulated damn thing they please.

Ravel was a composer of classical music, wasn't he?

When he had composer's block, did he ever unravel?

ysbaddaden @ 105:

Otay @ 103:

Fanon @ 95:

Otay @ 90:

That's not really a great approach to anything. I am going to oppose something just because a Republican is for it? No, thanks.

No, not because a Repug is for it, but because a Repug brings it to congress. Dems (and strong Dems, not pussy Dems) should be writing all of the legislation.

That's not how the system works. Our Founding Fathers intended Congress to be Enlightened, which means ration men (or persons) of sound character can work out their differences to a common good. Some like Washington wanted to avoid party politics, although it cropped up even while he was in office between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, and those who wanted to support the French Revolution, and those that opposed it.

Right now, you have no choice. The Repugs are playing the Dems for fools - having them sway to the far-right to meet the Repugs in the "middle" while the Repugs don't give an inch. So Nancy and Harry should gain some spines and at the least not introduce legislation that has not been fully vetted by progressives. If it has the mark of the Repugs all over it, don't introduce it - force them to rewrite it.

I don't think King brought up an unexpected point - it's a pretty obvious one.

It's so great seeing Bill. I've come to think he was even a better President than I thought at the time.
When you read Richard Clarke's book and see how Bill forced everyone together to work on national threats - made them talk to each other. Clinton gets great points from Clarke.
When you hear Greenspan talking about Clinton and how he well he handled the economy - high points from Greenspan.

I was listening to John Dean talk about how the conservatives have been working to turn the Executive branch into an Imperial Presidency. How, when Republicans complained about Clinton's power, it was completely disingenuous since he just was using what he had been given as opposed to Reagan who was the one who ratcheted it up. And, of course, Bush Jr. and Cheney who are taking it to the limit --- going for an elected monarchy --- again - Republican who gives us a good view of Clinton....

And - BTW - in reading the comments - I do not get why people complain that Edwards has money. So what? He earned it. Does that mean he can't try and help middle and lower income families? That used to be the DUTY of people with money - you give back to earn the right to enjoy what you have. It used to be called "noblesse oblige" before some people gave that a sarcastic spin.......

Stu Piddy @ 107: very sadly, I have come to the same conclusion.
I have hope in the long term, but not in the short.

[Deleted. Off topic-Sitemonitor]

Rush to War @ 116:

Waco happened under your watch Bill C, Why wasn't Reno disciplined, You Mr X president could have stopped the murder of 100 men women and children.

That had 3 Congressional Investigations, including the last one which was headed by a Republican, and it was found to be mass suicide murder. The Davidians were an apocolyptical Christian cult, and such are prone to such extreme acts.

The one who should've gotten disciplined was the reporter who tipped off Mt. Carmel the feds were coming to get a good quote for his story.

The reichwing provoked the showdown, by using the long delay to fault Clinton's administration, but that was because they were concerned of an outcome that did indeed come to pass, and then the reichwing shed crocodile tears.

I'm irritated at Blitzer's repeated attempts to portray this as an instance of Bill Clinton venting "anger." And I take issue with Nicole Belle's repetition of that claim (which may juice up reader interest, but does not comport with the video). I didn't see a "visibly angry" Clinton in this clip, but rather a firm rhetorical smackdown. Clinton v. Fox's Wallace, that was classic red-faced veins-a-poppin' ragin' Clinton. This was strong, factual and long overdue, but not angry.

Speaking of Chambliss. I think those black folks were photo shopped in? http://chambliss.senate.gov/public/index.cfm I doubt Chambliss has been that close to black folk without a sheet over his head.

[Deleted. Off topic-Sitemonitor]

L.A. Confidential @ 122:

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush should follow the example set by Ronald Reagan in supporting efforts to protect the ozone layer by showing leadership in the fight against global warming, Al Gore said on Wednesday.

Uh, okay.

Now THAT's acting. Is Gore going for another Oscar?

Rick Hunter @ 130:

What will we talk about once Bush is gone?

How long it might take to fix everything he's broken.

Rick Hunter @ 130:

What will we talk about once Bush is gone?

Hillary

Rick Hunter @ 130:

What will we talk about once Bush is gone?

While the nomination and presidential election is far from a forgone conclusion, the way things are going ... this site may very well become the forum for Hillary-hate and impeachment demands.

Good for Bill.

Now ask yourself this: If Senate Republicans introduced a measure to condemn Clinton's remarks, how many Dems would go along with it?

[Deleted. Off topic-Sitemonitor]

Rick Hunter @ 141:

PurplePatriot,
I won't attack Hillary.
She's the leader of my Party!
I will support her and hope that we make here President for life!
How dare anyone here criticize her!
That will be forbidden!

Now, now. You asked a question and I answered. Let's not put words in my mouth.

Excerpts from a recent speech by Daniel Ellsberg:

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2007/092607a.html

PurplePatriot @ 137:

Rick Hunter @ 130:

What will we talk about once Bush is gone?

While the nomination and presidential election is far from a forgone conclusion, the way things are going ... this site may very well become the forum for Hillary-hate and impeachment demands.

The Republicans will be pushing for the impeachment of Hillary because of Lewinsky by making the case that Hillary is joined to Bill by marriage and therefore should be impeached for her husband's transgressions that occured 10 years earlier because of the legal bond of marriage that links them.

Republicans on the Supreme Court overthrew one election by installing Chimp and Republicans in congress tried to overthrow another election by impeaching Bill over Lewinsky. I wouldn't put ANYTHING past these anti-American, anti-Democratic treasonous scumbags.