February 11, 2008 11:00 AM
Mike's Blog Roundup
The Existentialist Cowboy: George W. Bush's Unitary Law ends the Rule of Law, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, and the Separation of Powers.
Obsidian Wings: Just when I thought I couldn't be more angry about Iraq...
First Draft: Dana won't comment on how Chimpy's Torture Fetish has imperiled the case against KSM.
Common Cause Blog: Comcast's recently released 'terms of service' makes it clear that they intend to continue online censorship of free speech.
hearsay: A note on 'change.'
OFF THE BEATEN PATH: Undercover Black Man, Hill's Country, Insular Cabal, LAist

Free What?
Looks like this is the only Web Site covering the FISA Vote.
corrupt judges, federal prosecutors, top GOP officials, and ...
--> Alabama Republican Senator Jeff Sessions and Alabama Republican Governor Bob Riley is applying pressure on CBS to not run a completed 60 Minutes piece on the Siegelman affair.
But the segment may still air.
The federal political prosecution of
former Alabama Democratic Governor Don Siegelman.
Thanks Mike!
Senate is debating FISA on CSPAN2....
Republicans are proving that it's impossible to defend the bill without lying their asses off...
http://firedoglake.com/2008/02/12/fisa-fiasco-live-on-cspan2/
Let me see if I got this straight. They got confessions using torture. They don't want the torture to mess up prosecutions so they have spent 16 months getting the same info they got under torture so now its all legit. Do I have that right?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23120362
To ensure that the data would not be tainted by allegations of torture or illegal coercion, the FBI and military team won the suspects' trust over the past 16 months by using time-tested rapport-building techniques, the officials said.
Was coercive interrogation needed?
An unanswered question is whether the FBI and military interrogators could have extracted the same information without a road map from the CIA indicating what they might say. It also remains unknowable whether the detainees would have responded to a friendly approach without first receiving more aggressive treatment.
I am missing something here. Why are we being taken to a blog that is shutting down? Forgive me for asking or bitching or whatever but I'm having one of the saddest days of my life today and it just seems sadness brings out the ugliness in me. I'm sorry.
Basically the top 1% clearly see whats coming and they are fortifying their global fortresses and consolidating wealth and power into as few hands as possible while the rest of continue to cling to the fantasy we'll maybe get another cheap oil and gasoline fiesta.
How Hillary Will Win
In regards to Comcast... I would like for them to define "reasonable person". I may find something offensive or in poor taste, but as long as it's not hate (or bullying) speech or child pornography, I'll just ignore it and go my own way. However, what's to stop some "reasonable person" from finding some content on this site as offensive.
So are we going to be able to continue to consume and gobble up daily 28% of the worlds resources while only being 4% of the planets population or are we going to have to "adjust"?
What ya think?
senate is voting on the feinstein amendment right now.
pissed off patricia @ 7:
Tacky, POP.
I'm having a sad day, too.
Mike, thank you. I wish for you all the good things life has to offer.
:)
Did anyone hear the Tom Sullivan Show yesterday at about 3:00pm Central when he played tapes of Hitler's speeches and put them up against Obama's speeches for about 20 minutes? It was disgraceful.
How would one go about getting the audio/transcript of that?
it's all my fault . . . i deserve the hell in living in :(
Also on the Comcast story.
Since we are not allowed to mention nine-eleven on this site, (and i won't even comment on the relevance to censorship) I posted a comment on the Common Cause site below the Comcast story.
Hope you will all read it.
Y'all hear one of the possible sentences for Khalid Sheik Mohammed if he's convicted?
Being Jason Lee's stunt double on "My Name Is Earl."
Water torture has been acknowledged by the United States to be illegal since at least 1901 when an Army officer was convicted and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment for using it to torture a Philippine rebel.
In 1947, a Japanese officer was prosecuted by the United States for strapping a U.S. civilian to a tilted stretcher and pouring water over his face until he agreed to talk. The officer was convicted of a Violation of the Laws and Customs of War and was sentenced to 15 years of hard labor.
In 1968, the Washington Post published a photograph of an American soldier supervising the use of water torture on a North Vietnamese prisoner. The victim was being held down as water was poured over a cloth covering his nose and mouth to induce "a flooding sense of suffocation and drowning meant to make him talk." The soldier was charged, convicted and discharged from the Army.
If an army officer upon conviction is forced out of the military, do they call that a premature discharge?
None of these gutless, self-serving people are very good role models.
It never ceases to amaze me how some people continue to obsess over the dishonesty of Republicans, when the Democrats were so obviously lying through their teeth on the '06 campaign trail and have continued doing so even after seizing majority control of Congress. Historically dismal Congressional approval ratings confirm the American people are overwhelmingly not buying the partisan kool-aid being poured out by either side.
But Dana Perino is just so adorable when she lies, can't you mean ol' reporters lay off her? What's torture and execution, and a show trial as a political cudgel between friends?
Thanks for the linkage, Mike!
Well I hope Hill doesn't take down her site even if she quits blogging.. She's got some hilarious posts I like to revisit...
It must be a tremendous strain, standing before a group of people and having to answer,
'I don't know', to every single question of the multitude of questions they ask.
So occasionally, the Press Corps should toss in a softie to Perino, just to ease the strain.
Like, 'Did your labia moisten when you watched the CIA's waterboarding tapes?'
And if she answers, 'I don't know, you'll have to ask the President about that', the possible follow-up questions should provide great theater..
In every successful 'Con-Job' that's ever been run, in the history of civilization, there have been two elements that remained constant:
1. There has to be a Con-Man, and
2. There has to be a Sucker(s).
In the US, the politicians, and the Corporate 'leaders', are the Con-Men.
All the rest of us are the Suckers.
No matter how educated, how erudite, how convincingly we present our analyses of how fuc*ed-up, crooked, mendacious our nation, it's 'leaders', it's business, it's social structure is, we are the Suckers.
Because we put up with the Con, and the Con-Men.
Thanks, Mike.
re: Bush’s Unitary Law ends the Rule of Law, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights, and the Separation of Powers.
The Existentialist Cowboy page you linked has a lot of important info
and
Bavarian Illuminati Society, created May 1, 1776, just 3 months before July 4, 1776, and yes, ALL the revolutionaries were members!!
Confirmed Masons: James Otis (of " Taxation without representation is tyranny"), Samuel Adams, Edmund Burke, Joseph Warren, Paul Revere, John Hancock, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington ++
and, Marie-Joseph-Paul-Yves-Roch-Gilbert du Motier, aka the Marquis de Lafayette ...
1733 - In the United States, the first Masonic circles began to appear in 1733; by the time of the American Revolution, nearly 150 lodges existed throughout the colonies.
Comments are closed on this entry