Millions of honest americans and people all around the world are watching.

Especially the patriots watching the Chain of Custody
http://www.blackboxvoting.org
http://www.bradblog.com
and others

We also saw this..

Colorado "Right to Life" blasts Schaffer for
supporting Abramoff-client Mariana Islands
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/04/21/colorado-right-to-life-blasts-schaff...

the people have to stay one step ahead..

as a programmer of logic,
We also know that the other real story is that
--> McCain withheld 97% of the Abramoff hearings documents.

in a related story John "The Warmonger Republican" McCain feels confident in his ability to go forward with the victory in iraq. "mission accomplishment in progress" banners are being prepared, though the material necessary for the banners is being subtracted from "bandages and dressings" at Walter Reed, in the interest of a balanced budget.

during a hurried lunch, barack took a moment to say "oh yeah, well i'm rubber and your glue"
from her table across the restaurant, hillary ducked sniper-fire to reply "your wife is so overbearing they call her obama-mama"
bill scraped the waitress from beneath his table, added "hey obama, your pants are on fire, liar, liar"

As a PA resident, it just can't come soon enough. I look forward to the day, hopefully Wednesday, when the onslaught of campaign calls will cease.

Just as long as one day we may wake up from this eight year nightmare.

This weekend I saw a news clip of Obama going door to door in Pennsylvania. He just walked up to a house knocked on the door and introduced himself to whomever came to the door. Wow, if someone rang my doorbell and I looked out to see Senator Obama standing there, I would be so fu*king excited to get to talk to him.

If someone rang my doorbell and I looked out to see Senator Clinton standing there I would probably yell to her that I was under sniper fire and couldn't get to the door.

2 more sleeps for Hillary....then a wednesday morning concession speech

buh bye.

You're overestimating the relief you'll feel after tomorrow. We will just move onto the next primary.

I admit I still like it though, and I really respect Obama for encouraging Hillary to stay in the race. I hope Obama wins, but I respect the idea that everyone should have a vote.

The funniest thing, though, is that superdelegates can overturn the vote of the people. LOL! What a fucking farce.

If you're registered in either of these parties, LOL at you.

Because of the uncheckable,unauditable,no recount possible touch screen voting machines being used in Pennsylvania,we will never know who actually won the primary.

Some high level authority figure will step out from behind a curtain and announce who the winner is. Does that sound like the kind of democracy that you want to live in? If it doesn't, then you are the ones who will have to demand verifiable,transparent,and accurate elections and you need to start doing it now. Something to think about when you are pushing the buttons on your touch screen or putting your ballot into a computer programmed counting machine like an optical scan in November.

You can also think about it while you contemplate what life will be like for the next four years when McCain is declared as the president.

Hillary Rovian Clinton http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080421/ap_on_el_pr/democrats

for the love of all our party is supposed to stand for...

VOTE BARACK OBAMA on TUESDAY!!!!!

After Edwards backed out I licked my wounds and sat on the fence for a while before deciding narrowly to support Obama. That was then, this is now. I am OVER Hillary Clinton.

GObama!

alien @ 20:

Dr. Acula @ 12:

WTF is up w/Obama?

- McAincient would be a better prez than Bush.

- Clinton will win PA, but it will be close.

Huh?

i find neither of those things so inaccurate as to say "huh?" to.

if you don't realize that George W. Bush is a fundamentally worse person than John McCain then i don't know what to say. Yes, McCain's politics are ill conceived -- but he has integrities that Bush doesn't have -- it's hard to see in the blinding light of the election tomorrow -- but of course it's true. Is McCain a good choice for president? No. Is he just as bad as Bush? I mean, c'mon, the answer to that is NO.
.

Let's be brutally honest here. An empty chair in the Oval Office would have been better than Bush.

Ruthless People @ 19:

After Edwards backed out I licked my wounds and sat on the fence for a while before deciding narrowly to support Obama. That was then, this is now. I am OVER Hillary Clinton.

GObama!

I'm with you Ruthless....

Obama 08

Dr. Acula @ 12:

WTF is up w/Obama?

- McAincient would be a better prez than Bush.

- Clinton will win PA, but it will be close.

Huh?

Not sure McCain could be any worse than bush
All the polls right now show she will win but by how much is the big question. Hopefully we will get a really nice surprise once the votes are counted.

Obama is just calling them as he sees them. That's his style.

itsamessi @ 22:

Dr. Acula @ 12:

WTF is up w/Obama?

- McAincient would be a better prez than Bush.

- Clinton will win PA, but it will be close.

Huh?

Highly likely I say. I take your point though that he should not say it. Nothing to do with honesty but political expediency.

Thankfully someone understands my post!

clintons going to take indiana its in the bag!

Ruthless People @ 21:

alien @ 20:

Dr. Acula @ 12:
Let's be brutally honest here. An empty chair in the Oval Office would have been better than Bush.

yeah, this is true. i just think it's important to recognize what is so fundamentally awful about bush -- and equating it with what's wrong with mccain in my opinion -- gives Bush a pass.

bottom line -- there is absolutely no excuse for George W. Bush's administration over the last 8 years. it goes beyond differences in opinion on policy -- it's about a fundamentally dishonesty that subverts the whole point of the constitution.

the bush administration is a group of criminals. i don't believe the same of mccain -- though i'll admit its distasteful that he's using those people to help him get elected.

Ruthless People @ 21:

alien @ 20:

Dr. Acula @ 12:

WTF is up w/Obama?

- McAincient would be a better prez than Bush.

- Clinton will win PA, but it will be close.

Huh?

i find neither of those things so inaccurate as to say "huh?" to.

if you don't realize that George W. Bush is a fundamentally worse person than John McCain then i don't know what to say. Yes, McCain's politics are ill conceived -- but he has integrities that Bush doesn't have -- it's hard to see in the blinding light of the election tomorrow -- but of course it's true. Is McCain a good choice for president? No. Is he just as bad as Bush? I mean, c'mon, the answer to that is NO.
.

Let's be brutally honest here. An empty chair in the Oval Office would have been better than Bush.

I'm sure Bill Clinton had a alot of boosh in the Oval Office chair.

Elite Agenda

The leaders of the US, Mexico, and Canada are meeting in New Orleans today to firm up plans to stampede us all into a North American Union. Innocent headlines like "Bush seeks to cement legacy of ties with Canada, Mexico" seem innocuous on the surface until you read how the elite are planning to turn all three countries into a single EU-like trade menagerie.

PLEASE DELETE POST 31!

ugh -- i BUTCHERED that last post...my sincere apologies for that...

RUTHLESS PEOPLE said: LET'S BE BRUTALLY HONEST HERE. AN EMPTY CHAIR IN THE OVAL OFFICE WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER THAN BUSH"

to which i responded:

Dr. Acula @ 12:
Let’s be brutally honest here. An empty chair in the Oval Office would have been better than Bush.

yeah, this is true. i just think it’s important to recognize what is so fundamentally awful about bush — and equating it with what’s wrong with mccain in my opinion gives Bush a pass.

bottom line — there is absolutely no excuse for George W. Bush’s administration over the last 8 years. it goes beyond differences in opinion on policy — it’s about a fundamental dishonesty that subverts the whole point of the constitution.

the bush administration is a group of criminals. i don’t believe the same of mccain — though i’ll admit its distasteful that he’s using those people to help him get elected.

tyree at 73 @ 29:

clintons going to take indiana its in the bag!

Let's just hope she takes it far away!

Dr. Acula @ 32:

There can be NO PRAISE or semblance thereof for McBush from either of the Dem contenders.

My cat would make a better president than bush, but that sure isn't saying much for my cat. Not exactly praise.

Hillary has said she and McCain have a lifetime of experience. Bill Clinton said that Hillary and McCain are patriots and love their country. The Clinton's have equaled Hillary and McCain.

itsamessi @ 40:

pissed off patricia @ 36:

itsamessi @ 22:

Dr. Acula @ 12:

Highly likely I say. I take your point though that he should not say it. Nothing to do with honesty but political expediency.

Remember, Obama has said many times that he won't play the old game of politics.

True but no need to be naive about it.

Not saying Obama is naive of course.

Blue Lensman @ 39:

tyree at 73 @ 29:

clintons going to take indiana its in the bag!

Let's just hope she takes it far away!

hey i dont make the news i just report it!!!!!! shes going to take penn too! sorry about that!

John, there will be a Tuesday, and a Wednesday. And that day Obama AND Cllinton will still be going at each other.

I hope I'm wrong.

Let's get to the task of beating McCain.

"Stop the Pain - Stop McCain!" My new bumper sticker.

ysbaddaden @ 33:

Ruthless People @ 21:

alien @ 20:

Dr. Acula @ 12:

i find neither of those things so inaccurate as to say "huh?" to.

if you don't realize that George W. Bush is a fundamentally worse person than John McCain then i don't know what to say. Yes, McCain's politics are ill conceived -- but he has integrities that Bush doesn't have -- it's hard to see in the blinding light of the election tomorrow -- but of course it's true. Is McCain a good choice for president? No. Is he just as bad as Bush? I mean, c'mon, the answer to that is NO.
.

Let's be brutally honest here. An empty chair in the Oval Office would have been better than Bush.

I'm sure Bill Clinton had a alot of boosh in the Oval Office chair.

And he still managed to do a hell of a lot better job than Bush. Didn't stop the Rethuglicans from trying to overturn an election by overthrowing him though.

alien @ 38:

my god, i messed up again.

i hang my head in shame.

again, apologies to DR. ACULA and RUTHLESS PEOPLE for my misquotes -- i just copies and pasted wrong.

horrible.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQauQ6f72Zk

thanks. it's just frustrating when you're trying to make a point and you're held back by typos and html messups!

ha!

hey, i'm all for war games ... it *might* explain to McSame that attacking Iran is a baaaad idea.

it occurred to me yesterday and i thought "already?" i know i know, but there's been so much shit going on it rather snuck up on me...
and the rest won't come too soon... imagine how THOSE residents
feel about it!

with all of the new voters -- i don't think you can really predit the outcome of tomorrow -- there are just too many factors in this one -- what about all of the new registered voters? what about the republicans switching to the democrats so they can sabatoge our convention? tomorrow will bring what it will bring -- i'm just hoping it's fair.

dennis @ 58:

CLINTON INTERNALS SHOW 11-POINT LEAD IN PA

On to the convention!

tyree at 73 @ 45:

Blue Lensman @ 39:

tyree at 73 @ 29:

clintons going to take indiana its in the bag!

Let's just hope she takes it far away!

hey i dont make the news i just report it!!!!!! shes going to take penn too! sorry about that!

So, old far seeing one, is she gonna win by what % of the vote? If she doesn't blow Obama out by double digits, it don't mean a hill of beans, she still has lost.

Remember they don't poll anyone with a cell phone, only land lines. So who has only land lines? Mostly older people. Most young people have cell phones so I think the polling is missing them. That could make a difference in the results they are getting.

leftminded @ 64:

I say hold a half-dozen or so super Tuesdays, spread apart by a few weeks. Each featuring states spread across the country. All the candidates are in until the end, every voter gets a choice, it's all over in a few months, then, in the end, a winner is declared and it's off to the convention. Is there something wrong with that?

How about ONE super Tuesday if you want to make it fair to all voters, or just let the party choose their own candidate like most nations with parliamentary systems. Just think how much time, money and effort would be saved, and how much less influence the corporate big spenders would have in the process

I hope to be wrong, but I have this sick, queasy feeling that Clinton will stay in the race as long as she can past Pennsylvania. Even if she doesn't win by +20 points or more, which she needs to in order to stay in. Even though her campaign is in the red about $10 million.

diamondmc @ 61:

tyree at 73 @ 45:

Blue Lensman @ 39:

tyree at 73 @ 29:

Let's just hope she takes it far away!

hey i dont make the news i just report it!!!!!! shes going to take penn too! sorry about that!

So, old far seeing one, is she gonna win by what % of the vote? If she doesn't blow Obama out by double digits, it don't mean a hill of beans, she still has lost.

like i give a crap!!!!!!one way or the other young far i got mine allready! now fight for yours!

they will wind up giveing clinton florida and michigan watch them!

pissed off patricia @ 28:

"Hillary O-wait Obama'08" I like that! Good one, bilhelm.

Thanks POP.

39 Blue Lensman Says: tyree at 73 @ 29:

clintons going to take indiana its in the bag!

Let’s just hope she takes it far away!
=================================
I went there once, and I found it kinda scary.

alien @ 38:

my god, i messed up again.

i hang my head in shame.

again, apologies to DR. ACULA and RUTHLESS PEOPLE for my misquotes -- i just copies and pasted wrong.

horrible.

Allen, your humility is commendable. I wish other would stand up for when they err so quickly.

alien @ 42

Amen. Why is it that now Democrats want to hang Bill Clinton's mistake (one that we should never have even known about) around Hillary's neck? This is the rhetoric that will destroy our chances in Nov. to take back the WH. She is not Bill Clinton and she had to handle that shame in public along with their daughter and to relish in that now is rude and no better than the repukes.

It won't matter.

Hillary can lose PA by 20% and she'll just declare PA to be an "unimportant state."

Hillary can lose the nomination and she'll argue that just because a candidate is nominated at the convention, technically that doesn't mean the party has to put him on the ticket.

The party can put Obama on the ticket and Hillary will still run as an "independent Democrat" to give the voters "real choice."

If she splits the Democratic support base and gives the win to McCain by default, she'll point out that technically there's no law requiring electors to vote for their pledged candidates.

There is no road to the White House she will abandon. Tuesday will settle nothing.

My apologies, albatross. It's getting unbearable, but no hiatus. Let's get this thing over with.

JasonS @ 81:

It won't matter.

Hillary can lose PA by 20% and she'll just declare PA to be an "unimportant state."

Hillary can lose the nomination and she'll argue that just because a candidate is nominated at the convention, technically that doesn't mean the party has to put him on the ticket.

The party can put Obama on the ticket and Hillary will still run as an "independent Democrat" to give the voters "real choice."

If she splits the Democratic support base and gives the win to McCain by default, she'll point out that technically there's no law requiring electors to vote for their pledged candidates.

There is no road to the White House she will abandon. Tuesday will settle nothing.

This is too true.

JasonS @ 81:

It won't matter.

Hillary can lose PA by 20% and she'll just declare PA to be an "unimportant state."

Hillary can lose the nomination and she'll argue that just because a candidate is nominated at the convention, technically that doesn't mean the party has to put him on the ticket.

The party can put Obama on the ticket and Hillary will still run as an "independent Democrat" to give the voters "real choice."

If she splits the Democratic support base and gives the win to McCain by default, she'll point out that technically there's no law requiring electors to vote for their pledged candidates.

There is no road to the White House she will abandon. Tuesday will settle nothing.

tell her the only way she can get in is to crawl back up through the plumbing. she'll do it. this woman is driven.

Clinton's Rove inspired gutter politics and teaming up with the ultra right conservatives to attack and smear Obama , I wonder if people are smart enough to see through her and recognize her sleaze tactics for what they are or again blind and dumb as a box of rocks , as in elected Bush twice . Well , sort of elected Bush . Hey I think I got banned from blogging or commenting on the ABC sites , apparently Charles Gibson and company didn't like what I had to say , I also called the Limbaugh ditto heads out who were posting lies and absurdities against Obama , posing as Clinton Dems of course . You guys will have to take over for me . LOL

I have been youtubing people's personal endorsments for the Democratic nominee all night.

I will be voting for Clinton or Obama, depending on who the nominee is. I strongly hope Obama is the nominee. That being said I have to comment on the mood of Obama endorsements v Clinton. Every Clinton endorsement I've seen is very angry and dismissive of Obama and his supporters. The Obama endorsements are (typically) calm, serious, and optimistic. I could only find one that mentioned Hillary or the bickering that has been going on between camps. This is in no way a reflection of Clinton herself, but more an observation of her supporters. In almost all of the Clinton endorsements I could find, the youtuber felt the need to make special mention that there was no way in hell they would vote for Obama - in most cases saying they would not vote in November, and in some cases saying McCain.

I find this disturbing. It seems like a very smart strategy to consolidate undecided, left-leaning, voters. It seems as if Hillary supporters are attempting to strongarm the Democratic party into a nomination for her by saying 'We won't vote democrat unless it's Clinton' Is this reaching, or could there actually be a strategy set out to attempt to intimidate her in to the nomination?

Has this idea posted on this site? I haven't seen it online (or in print/cable news) yet.

I would appeal to all Clinton supporters to reject the BS that has choked our country for the last 7 years. If you honestly think McCain would serve your interest better than Obama, by all means don't vote. If you just like Clinton better than Obama, than I would hope you'd look at the EXTREME similarities in their policies.

What do you think?