House Republicans reverse course, object to fair elections

Despite unanimously supporting a bill in committee two weeks ago that would provide federal funds to local governments to pay for recounts and paper trails, House Republicans have reversed course and blocked the bill from receiving an up-or-down vote. This move ensures two things, and two things only: a) the accusations of fraud that marred the 2000 and 2004 elections will continue, and b) the GOP shows once and for all that they have nothing but contempt for our democracy and free and fair elections.

Politico:

Voting rights activists who hoped the federal government would help local governments pay for paper trails and audits for electronic voting machines have gone from elation to frustration as they watched Republicans who supported such a proposal in committee vote against bringing it to the House floor.

When New Jersey Democratic Rep. Rush Holt’s Emergency Assistance for Secure Elections Act came up for a vote in the House Administration Committee on April 2, the Republicans on the committee gave it their unanimous support. But two weeks later, those same Republican members voted against moving the bill to the House floor. It would have taken a two-thirds vote to push the bill to the floor; with most House Republicans opposed, the bill didn’t make it that far.

Tin foil hats aside, what possible reason could the GOP have for opposing such a measure? 2000 and 2004 have left such a bitter taste in the electorate's mouth that this seems like a no-brainer.



Login or Register to post comments.

87 comments

tin hat reason: Diebold's let them know that the 'fix' is in.

Well, we are totally screwed. Bush won't be satisfied until we have no rights whatsoever. The Repugs have doomed us all. Why do such a small group of millionaires have so much power? Pray.

The GOP Hates America. Their distaste for the burden of the unwashed should be obvious by now.

They are going to fiddle around and one day Americans are going to go to the polls, not to vote, but to drag the voting machines out into the streets and set them on fire.

Tin foil hats aside, what possible reason could the GOP have for opposing such a measure? 2000 and 2004 have left such a bitter taste in the electorate’s mouth that this seems like a

Could it be the utter contempt these evil, criminal subhumans have for the working class and the cum guzzling adoration of the wealthiest 1%? Just saying...

Welcome American aristocracy. Will the first emperor be a Clinton or a Bu$h?

bitter Edwin Hussein @ 6:

Welcome American aristocracy. Will the first emperor be a Clinton or a Bu$h?

Was Reagan.

Your right LA, The GOP always stated they were for smaller government. The truth is they hate the government and are hell-bent to destroy it.

P.D. @ 8:

Your right LA, The GOP always stated they were for smaller government. The truth is they hate the government and are hell-bent to destroy it.

And our rights and freedoms right along with it.

P.D. @ 8:

Your right LA, The GOP always stated they were for smaller government. The truth is they hate the government and are hell-bent to destroy it.

They may just succeed if McCain gets in.

bitter Edwin Hussein @ 6:

Welcome American aristocracy. Will the first emperor be a Clinton or a Bu$h?

Corporate Aristocracy

The corporations (along with the corporate media) want a compliant congress and electorate as well as a pliant employee and consumer. That is all they want and there is little they will not do to achieve their goal.

Your 30 pieces of silver is in the mail Monday according to King W by the way.

If you can say one thing about repubs they stand together and block bills they don't like. Dems never do that. Why don't the Dems start blocking some bills.

Exit polls extremely accurate everywhere to within 3/10s of a point (0.3%) except the USA...
Even the pollsters like Zogby are worried.

The first indication that something was gravely amiss on November 2nd, 2004, was the inexplicable discrepancies between exit polls and actual vote counts. Polls in thirty states weren't just off the mark -- they deviated to an extent that cannot be accounted for by their margin of error.

rolling Stone article

Was the 2004 Election Stolen? Sources and Commentary

Skoalbandit @ 14:

If you can say one thing about repubs they stand together and block bills they don't like. Dems never do that. Why don't the Dems start blocking some bills.

Because they lack purpose and unity. Each of them is in it for themselves.

it's just as plain as answer as you can expect:

THE REPUBLICANS ARE FASCISTS
THE REPUBLICANS ARE FASCISTS

L.A. Confidential @ 16:

Skoalbandit @ 14:

If you can say one thing about repubs they stand together and block bills they don't like. Dems never do that. Why don't the Dems start blocking some bills.

Because they lack purpose and unity. Each of them is in it for themselves.

The problem is that they liked it until Bush told them not to like it.

xoites (Bitter Before Country Was Cool) defends Constitution @ 4:

They are going to fiddle around and one day Americans are going to go to the polls, not to vote, but to drag the voting machines out into the streets and set them on fire.

tthey aint got the guts or it would allready have happened!

Ron @ 18:

The problem is that they liked it until Bush told them not to like it.

Indeed. Fall in line now Dems.

Tin foil hats aside, what possible reason could the GOP have for opposing such a measure?

surely this is a rhetorical question.

Republicans are liars and cannot be trusted.

Skoalbandit @ 14:

If you can say one thing about repubs they stand together and block bills they don't like. Dems never do that. Why don't the Dems start blocking some bills.

because thier all the same?

Tin foil hats aside, what possible reason could the GOP have for opposing such a measure?

Kissinger probably calls Bush and says whip those pion's in line!

Sh@#.

Seriously.

What are we gonna do about this?

neamhni hussein @ 25:

Sh@#.

Seriously.

What are we gonna do about this?

what we allways do!

I have little respect , enthusiasm or hope for the Democratic party , only with completely new leadership would there be any hope , they have proved to be impotent self serving wimps , one third are nothing but Republic-rats . But the Republican party , they are ruthless criminals and cut throats , perverts and organized white trash . When a Dem talks about compromise or working together with those across the isle I cringe , "compromise" with them and you are compromising ethics and values and are screwing the American people one way or another . Need to fight them every step of the way , this ain't grandpa's Republican party !

The Republican party is made up of bottom feeding scum suckers who are so stinking corrupt that everything they touch turns to shit. They keep getting away with it because people like Pelosi sits on her ass and refuses to put impeachment on the table. They get away with it because when it was clear that the 2000 election was a political maneuver by Daddy's supreme court and all the Democrats sat there bitching but did nothing else. In 2004 when it was clear that the voting machines had been tampered with and there was evidence NOBODY did a damned thing. They sat on their asses while the war criminal finished off this country. There is something really wrong with those people. Are they the product of too many drugs while in school that Daddy paid for and they didn't study but got a diploma anyway? Are they products of too much inbreeding?

Also, what the hell is wrong with the democrats in Congress that they just sit there and wait, what the hell are you waiting for? Bush to strike Iran and then declare martial law and put a stop to elections? To throw your asses all in prison while his cohorts take over your positions? You will deserve it if that happens because you have been sitting there for 8 years while the Republican party has raped our children, condemned others for what they do in secret, for destroying our constitution and bill of rights, for stacking courts in their favor. YOUR SITTING ON YOUR FAT ASSES HAS CONTRIBUTED TO THESE BASTARDS GETTING AWAY WITH ALL THIS SHIT. BLOOD IS ON YOUR HANDS AS WELL.

I am a big fan of the recount and maybe a little money to "help out" (a state or two) with a recount now and again isnt such a bad idea...

...but I am kinda, leery about the "Federal Govt" involved in any re-count situation...they seem quite incapable of (handling) anything...(just look at) Enron, 9/11, Katrina, Iraq war, economy, social security, national debt, inflation, homeland security...ect...ect...

I think schools and elections should be operate on a more local level...act locally...lets continue to let local citizens to keep an eye on the polls...

I can see it now....

no voter left behind.....Ha!

Just proves we've been right all along - they can't win on their platform - fear and cheating are all they have left. Seriously, how does anyone with a conscience call themself a republican today?

Well, we have to grow our own food. Too bad I can't stock up on rice now. You know, with the whole world in a global food crisis.

like i keep telling you!the 08 elections over!and you lost!

Do or die

The Republicans have to retain the presidency, and with it control of the evidence and the prosecutors, or hundreds of them are going to jail, and some to death row. They would rather just win at the polls. But failing that, and that route may not be open to them this cycle, I'm sure that they would rather have their packed courts steal it for them, than have to resort to an out-and-out coup. But there has to be some excuse for the courts to intervene. For this purpose, the great thing about voting without a paper trail is that there is inherently no way to prove the negative if someone alleges fraud. Such systems really could quite credibly be hacked, or simply have a bug, such that they swing several percentage points in several states, without the involvement of the large numbers of people that it would take to do that before computerized voting. They don't even have to hack the machines themselves, they simply have to allege that it happened, somehow, if only by computer error rather than anyone's intent.

They don't really need the courts to just outrightly hand the presidency to a Republican candidate who lost by several percentage points. They just need a credible pretext for the courts to tie up the results of such a race by invalidating enough EC votes that neither candidate has a majority. If they accomplish that, their path is easy if they retain control of at least 26 House delegations, which, given that small states trend Republican, could very well happen even if the overall Democratic majority gets bigger. Even if their debacle is so great that they don't even control a majority of the state delegations in the 111th Congress, all hope is not lost. The Democratic majority might well be intimidated into not going ahead with the procedure outlined in the 12th Amendment for determining who won the election, but rather meekly leave that question to the courts. If they are unwilling to seize the presidency for a Democrat that way, what we're left with is the choice by Congress of an acting president, as outlined in the 20th Amendment, to serve until such time as the courts decide who won the election (which they never will). Now, the Democrats could wait until after 1/20/09 to choose such an acting president, so that their choice would not be subject to a Bush veto. But they wouldn't so choose, because they would not be willing to go for, and the courts would come back in the picture if they tried, any of the three options involved: leaving the presidency vacant for any length of time, or making the Speaker or President Pro Tem president by way of Congressional inaction, or letting a Bush cabinet member succeed instead. They will be under prerssure that they almost certainly will not withstand to vote an acting president before 1/20/09. But this is all the Republicans need in order to avoid legal accountability in the next administration. Bush will be able to veto a majority choice for his successor, and that veto will be sustained unless the Democrats get 2/3 majorities in both chambers, which they probably won't. Bush will thus be able to block any candidate who is not committed to not prosecuting BushCo. There will have to be a "compromise" candidate, a Democrat, perhaps, but some turncoat "centrist" like Lieberman.

L.A. Confidential @ 33:

Dynamic

http://tinyurl.com/6xp584

She's looking pretty shabby there.

“Tin foil hats aside, what possible reason could the GOP have for opposing such a measure?”
Are you kidding me? Most people don’t need “Tin foil hats” because nothing will penetrate their hard heads anyway.
But seriously, after all the trouble the republicans went through to privatize the voting system so they could cheat, do you really think they would undo all that? Get real!

I have been saying that they will be putting the Diebold machines in service to steal the votes again. There were reports of the machines not working in Pennsylvania but nothing in the MSM since Tuesday. We have to have our people at the polls on election day. The world will not survive another 4 years of repugnantcant rule.

Serious question:

Any chance this bill will be brought to the floor anyway? can it be attached to something the Fascists themselves want?

Voting is now, more than ever, for chumps.

Olberman just reported that Bush ( surprise ! !surprise ! ) sent out a memo saying that he opposed the bill and like good little nazis they all obeyed little Nero and reversed their earlier vote . Evidently they are still afraid of the Bush neocon cabal ?

tyree @ 26:

neamhni hussein @ 25:

Sh@#.

Seriously.

What are we gonna do about this?

what we allways do!

withold your income tax.

http://wethepeoplecongress.org/index.php

milquetoast @ 41:

tyree @ 26:

neamhni hussein @ 25:

Sh@#.

Seriously.

What are we gonna do about this?

what we allways do!

withold your income tax.

http://wethepeoplecongress.org/index.php

And go to jail like Wesley Snipes?

milquetoast @ 29:

I am a big fan of the recount and maybe a little money to "help out" (a state or two) with a recount now and again isnt such a bad idea...

...but I am kinda, leery about the "Federal Govt" involved in any re-count situation...they seem quite incapable of (handling) anything...(just look at) Enron, 9/11, Katrina, Iraq war, economy, social security, national debt, inflation, homeland security...ect...ect...

I think schools and elections should be operate on a more local level...act locally...lets continue to let local citizens to keep an eye on the polls...

I can see it now....

no voter left behind.....Ha!

2000 and 2004 was 'local' doing the election, local Republicans stealing and twisting the vote.
that and the organized RNC caging.

Why does anyone even link to Politico?

Why the heck did the Dems let the Repugs pretend to be party to this bill? Did they really believe the Repugs were out there to show "bipartisanship"?

In other news, Lucy pulls the football from Charlie Brown yet one more time. Charlie Brown is astonished.

Paul's Bunions @ 42:

milquetoast @ 41:

tyree @ 26:

neamhni hussein @ 25:
what we allways do!

withold your income tax.

http://wethepeoplecongress.org/index.php

And go to jail like Wesley Snipes?

Not necessarily...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5Of8M1MZJQ

Don't make fun of my hat.

Skoalbandit @ 14:

If you can say one thing about repubs they stand together and block bills they don't like. Dems never do that. Why don't the Dems start blocking some bills.

Because they like those fat paychecks they will continue to receive.

Isn't it obvious?
Why do you think the media has been pushing the "exit polls are always wrong" meme?
Why do you think the media has been telling us that the race between McCain and whoever the Democratic candidate is will be "too close to call", when we all know that McCain will lose the popular vote by at least 20%?
Why would Republicans who supported this proposal in committee vote against bringing it to the House floor?
Someone gave them a memo, the 2008 election will be hijacked, and don't screw it up.
The neoconservative agenda is too far along now for something as trivial as the will of the people to stop it now.

..........BASTARDS!!!!!!.....................

P.S. Glen Tomkins@34;

Oooo, that's just sick enough to be plausible.....JD

The real question here is why Dennis Kucinich voted against the bill. I've yet to hear an explanation for why he would do that.

Everyone's too busy to put it all together, everyone's too busy or lacking imagination to stage a revolutionary movement to throw of the tyrant, the murderer, the liar? A peaceful movement ideally? Will it take to long? Will people find themselves in a lonely hard place before it's too late, few options, little sense, just a gut wound boring into hearts and minds filled with expectation? ... I don't believe in god, do i believe in you? ... do i believe in you? ... where is America?

Shit, dennis did what? ... heh ... hehehehe ... that makes perfect sense ... exactly nowhere ...

IRAQI ORPHANS! IRAQI ORPHANS!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K6xM2BbTjQ0&feature=related

kid's stuff on the ps2!! 8P

12,000 suicide attempts a year sir?! Rock and Roll for the masses?

I remember back when i was a CHRISTIAN KID ... like 15 years ago, i was dumb as shit, from a broken home, hit the streets @15. And still I believed, that shit sets you up for a lot of problems. I remember they were testing cruise missles in my back yard in cold lake alberta. Those motherfucking volkswagon sized cruise missiles filled to the brim with high explosives slamming into everything so hard ... my friend warned me, and he was right, it was as plain as day.

It's easy to have faith as long as you don't think lol ...

And Canada has quite a legacy selling nuclear reactors all over the place, playing kingmaker, and cow tower to king nazi man in DC ... abandoning our children by legal decree in gulags oh yah, khadr family are quite not good, but what of the rule of law sir? He's just another victim of religion and myth. Myth ...

Democracy? heh

Isn't it OBVIOUS? Illegally programmed voting machines is "their only hope."

Seriously... we must ALL be prepared to take back this government if the Republicans "win" the White House this year.

P.D. @ 8:

Your right LA, The GOP always stated they were for smaller government. The truth is they hate the government and are hell-bent to destroy it.

They're not anti-government. They're anti-governement-they-don't-control. They clearly don't want lawlessness. They just don't want laws that hinder them in any way.

President PNACcio @ 49:

Isn't it obvious?
Why do you think the media has been pushing the "exit polls are always wrong" meme?
Why do you think the media has been telling us that the race between McCain and whoever the Democratic candidate is will be "too close to call", when we all know that McCain will lose the popular vote by at least 20%?
Why would Republicans who supported this proposal in committee vote against bringing it to the House floor?
Someone gave them a memo, the 2008 election will be hijacked, and don't screw it up.
The neoconservative agenda is too far along now for something as trivial as the will of the people to stop it now.

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
How could it be possible for them to ignore the people's rights?

There is NOT A DAMN THING "tinfoil hat" about questioning the 2000 and 2004 elections. Those elections were straight fucked and it's really become a serious case of "The Emperor's New Clothes", where everyone is just too chickenshit to acknowledge the obvious.

I blame the dems. For 2 years they did nothing to push for paper trails, and fair elections and to bring that important message to the masses, so the gop would be way too embarrased to pull what was obvious their intention in the first place.

Vote the GOP Bums out!

America proudly claims that it is the bastion of democracy, yet tolerates a mish-mash of State electoral systems that would embarrass any third world country. Any system of voting must have an audit trail to enable verification by scrutineers. If it doesn't, it has no place in a genuine Democracy.

So it just occurred to me, (I know I am slow shut up), that the argument for paper ballots usually runs along the lines of "ballot box stuffing". However, the counter to that is that if we had an audit trail of " did this voter vote?" yes / no, then each ballot could be counted, and verified that a voter actually exists for said ballot it automatically throws out unverified ballots. (No verification, no vote)..

Takes care of stuffing ballot boxes. Hehe yeah that's probably why we don't have fair elections anymore. Too complicated for them.

[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an open thread. Site Monitor]

[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an open thread. Site Monitor]

[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an open thread. Site Monitor]

[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an open thread. Site Monitor]

[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an open thread. Site Monitor]

[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an open thread. Site Monitor]

President PNACcio @ 49:

Isn't it obvious?
Why do you think the media has been pushing the "exit polls are always wrong" meme?
Why do you think the media has been telling us that the race between McCain and whoever the Democratic candidate is will be "too close to call", when we all know that McCain will lose the popular vote by at least 20%?
Why would Republicans who supported this proposal in committee vote against bringing it to the House floor?
Someone gave them a memo, the 2008 election will be hijacked, and don't screw it up.
The neoconservative agenda is too far along now for something as trivial as the will of the people to stop it now.

If you are going to STEAL AN ELECTION VIA VOTE RIGGING – you need to lay the ground work – planting doubt in the minds of the electorate through the media shills.

Exit polling has been a reliable method by which to approximate the result of elections prior to the final votes being tallied. Exit polling has only been called into question in the last two election cycles – but ONLY because the Exit Polling data were not confirmed by the final “official” vote tally. As has now been proven, it was not the Exit Polling data that was inaccurate or unreliable, it was the reporting of the Official Total” that had been tampered with.

It’s time to TAKE THE OFFENSIVE where Exit Polling is concerned and reveal this Swiftboating of “Exit Polling” for what it is – a Rovian sham designed specifically to condition the electorate to disbelieve the exit poll results (which will portray the house and Senate going under Democratic Control), and rather to only believe the “Official” (FALSE) vote count.

The Mainstream Media is fully complicit in the Rovian Brainwashing campaign to discredit “Exit Polling” as unscientific hoohah, when in fact it is the smoking gun EVIDENCE of election fraud used throughout the world. Ask International Elections Observers about the value of Exit Polling.

The GOP has employed a firm called Penn, Schoen, & Berland to skew exit poll results in the past in order to achieve their own political ends. Watch out for this firm’s exit poll results in this years elections. They are on Rove’s payroll:

http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=70727

Electoral Fraud Is the First Step on the Road to Tyranny

http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=70456

Read the link above – GREAT ARTICLE.

November 2, 2004: Overcoming a six point exit-poll advantage by Senator John Kerry, George Bush is re-elected President. Several statisticians have calculated the probability of this anomaly as one in a million -- in effect, impossible.

Revisit the exit polling data from 2004 and share it with others:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._presidential_election_controversy...

Call it to the attention of the media. Let the media know that we WILL NOT TOLERATE another stolen election, nor will we tolerate their complicity in disparaging the validity of Exit Polling as a valuable check against election fraud.

CNN’s Jeff Greenfield was interviewed about the then forthcoming 2004 elections, and his parting comment at the end of the segment was what would have appeared to be an off-handed disparaging remark about the reliability of Exit Polls.

Greenfield was/is a shill for AIPAC – and this was a TALKING POINT ordered up by Rove. “Exit Polling” had not been part of the prior discussion, but was something that he slipped in at the end of the segment – as if ordered to do so.

DON’T LET THEM SWIFTBOAT “EXIT POLLING”

Erasing history on Wikipedia:

Who would have the power/authority to completely erase a massive page of Wikipedia historical evidence related to the theft of the 2004 elections in the United States?

YOU WANT EVIDENCE?

HERE'S YOUR EVIDENCE:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._presidential_election_controversy...

Smartmatic and its Trojan Horse, Sequoia:

http://209.85.207.104/search?q=cache:IZHygJuclEIJ:www.conspiracyplanet.c...

"Smartmatic is privately held," Shafer, a former executive with a Texas-based computer voting company, said. "A controlling interest is held by its founder and CEO, Antonio Mugica, who holds dual Spanish and Venezuelan citizenship."

However, as Smartmatic's Uniform Business Report for the Florida Dept. of State, dated Jan. 27, 2003, reveals, three men named "Antonio Mugica" sit on the board of the company.

Antonio Mugica is the president; Antonio Mugica Rivero is chairman of the board, and Antonio Mugica Sesma, company director and father of the president, is reportedly the owner of the house on Dinner Key Drive in Boca Raton where the company was based.

This raises a number of questions.

How has a little family-run company of three relatives and two friends, all Venezuelans, based in a house in Boca Raton in 2003, been able to take control of the counting of the votes for 40 million Americans?

And why has the mainstream media ignored the important questions of ownership that surround Sequoia Voting Systems and the other private companies that count our votes?

How was this tiny backroom company able to attract four senior executives from the U.S. computer giant Unisys to fill the positions of president, two vice presidents, and corporate controller?

UNISYS - THE MOSSAD'S TROJAN HORSE?

Unisys is headed by Lawrence A. Weinbach, who is president, chief executive officer and chairman of the computer giant who provides computer equipment and software for all of the key agencies of the U.S. government and leading companies.

Under Weinbach, Unisys has integrated Israeli security software, provided by the Israel-based Check Point Software Technologies and Eurekify, into its own software.

Israeli software, written by Mossad-linked companies, now "secures" the most sensitive computers in the U.S. government and commercial sector.

"Unisys combines Check Point's security technologies within Unisys solutions across strategic vertical markets including the commercial and federal sectors," Unisys says on its website.

"100 percent of the Fortune 100 rely on Check Point for unequalled security and worry-free protection," it says.

nony @ 73:

Smartmatic and its Trojan Horse, Sequoia:

http://209.85.207.104/search?q=cache:IZHygJuclEIJ:www.conspiracyplanet.c...

"Smartmatic is privately held," Shafer, a former executive with a Texas-based computer voting company, said. "A controlling interest is held by its founder and CEO, Antonio Mugica, who holds dual Spanish and Venezuelan citizenship."
. . .

UNISYS - THE MOSSAD'S TROJAN HORSE?

Unisys is headed by Lawrence A. Weinbach, who is president, chief executive officer and chairman of the computer giant who provides computer equipment and software for all of the key agencies of the U.S. government and leading companies.

. . .

"Unisys combines Check Point's security technologies within Unisys solutions across strategic vertical markets including the commercial and federal sectors," Unisys says on its website.

"100 percent of the Fortune 100 rely on Check Point for unequalled security and worry-free protection," it says.

One thing about that. We actually have a Checkpoint product where I work. It's crap. But not because it's not secure. Just because it's massively irritating to the end user.

If there were backdoors in checkpoint's product, I assure you hackers would have found them by now. They would be spending ALL their time doing nothing else.

UnEasyOne @ 38:

Serious question:

Any chance this bill will be brought to the floor anyway? can it be attached to something the Fascists themselves want?

Is it not funny how when the Republicans controlled the House (by an equally slim margin) the minority party (Democrats) were not able to block bills from coming to the floor but now the minority party (Republicans) can? Same in the Senate where "TuTu Reid" is constantly stymied by the very same threat of minority filibuster that he was not able to make work when he was the minority.

Something is going on. Combine that with the turn from issues that they ran on (such as impeachment, ending the occupation) and the refusal to push even half as hard as the Republicans did on bills that count, and it's pretty plain that the Democrats are more concerned with getting re-elected than with advancing their stated (but not seriously believed) agenda. I for one am through with them.

DIEBOLDED!!!!

I can see the headlines now.....McCain Wins By A Landslide!!!! People Rejoice in the Streets!

Leiberman_Loves_Him_Some_McCain @ 76:

UnEasyOne @ 38:

Serious question:

Any chance this bill will be brought to the floor anyway? can it be attached to something the Fascists themselves want?

Is it not funny how when the Republicans controlled the House (by an equally slim margin) the minority party (Democrats) were not able to block bills from coming to the floor but now the minority party (Republicans) can? Same in the Senate where "TuTu Reid" is constantly stymied by the very same threat of minority filibuster that he was not able to make work when he was the minority.

Something is going on. Combine that with the turn from issues that they ran on (such as impeachment, ending the occupation) and the refusal to push even half as hard as the Republicans did on bills that count, and it's pretty plain that the Democrats are more concerned with getting re-elected than with advancing their stated (but not seriously believed) agenda. I for one am through with them.

the Republicans do not think for themselves and can be counted on by their leadership to vote exactly as they are told on legislation that is critical to their corrupt and irrational agenda. and the GOP has the most effective tool for keeping their politicians and media in line, a tool progressives largely ignore- their talk radio monopoly, with its uncontested repetition of lies, distortions, threats and swiftboating to 50-70MIL.
the GOP politicians would have drowned in their own hypocrisy by now if it wasn't for the daily denial blasted out across the country on talk radio. and without accounting for the talk radio soapbox the GOP dominates, the effectiveness of Dem politicians cannot be accurately evaluated.

[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an open thread. Site Monitor]

Republicans operate under the premise that the "end justifies the means".

So they will "swiftboat" any dem, jam phone lines on election day, not have enough polling machines in democratic neighborhoods, give out wrong directions to polling places, mass e-mailing of outright lies, fear-mongering, waving the flag, claim god is on our side, etc.

The only way the re-thugs can win is by stealing the Pres. elections - of course they do not want a paper trail of their criminal activity!

They do it because it works. The Dems can't vote together as a bloc on anything. The Repubs will keep doing it because they always win. The Repubs control everything when they are in the majority and when they're in the minority. Way it goes.

Kay @ 81:

They do it because it works. The Dems can't vote together as a bloc on anything. The Repubs will keep doing it because they always win. The Repubs control everything when they are in the majority and when they're in the minority. Way it goes.

that's because they've got the biggest soapbox in the country- the talk radio monopoly- and they can say anything they want on it, over and over and over to "catapult the propaganda", as bush said, and detemine the flavor of the MSM. and there is no way for Americans to get in front of the soapbox blowhard's face.

nony @ 79:

[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an open thread. Site Monitor]

When you injected the "tin foil hat" meme at the outset, this became a thread about conspiracy theories (as evidenced by the countless other individuals who took offense).

[And you stated your case in a comment that I didn't delete, then hammered and hammered and hammered away at it. It's a topic that you seem to be almost monomaniacal about, not just on this thread.. As I pointed out to you, you may feel free to post further on an Open Thread, but please quit trying to hijack this thread. Also, the comment in the OP isn't "Let's put the tin foil hats aside and ordain every wild theory legitimate," an acceptance of all theories, but rather, "Tin foil hats aside,...," which you should interpret as theories other than those of the tin foil hat variety. Site Monitor]

nony @ 83:

nony @ 79:

[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an open thread. Site Monitor]

When you injected the "tin foil hat" meme at the outset, this became a thread about conspiracy theories (as evidenced by the countless other individuals who took offense).

[And you stated your case in a comment that I didn't delete, then hammered and hammered and hammered away at it. It's a topic that you seem to be almost monomaniacal about, not just on this thread.. As I pointed out to you, you may feel free to post further on an Open Thread, but please quit trying to hijack this thread. Also, the comment in the OP isn't "Let's put the tin foil hats aside and ordain every wild theory legitimate," an acceptance of all theories, but rather, "Tin foil hats aside,...," which you should interpret as theories other than those of the tin foil hat variety. Site Monitor]

[Deleted. Off topic. Here's the commenting policy. For further clarification, please contact us at sitemonitor1@gmail.com . Thank you. Site Monitor]

Neo-Facsism

Bush Administration...Worst President Ever.

www.crooksandliars.com/2008/04/22/the-worst-president-ever

87 comments

Login or Register to post comments.