TOPICS

97-Year-Old Arizona Woman Disenfranchised by Voter ID Law

Shirley Preiss was born in Kentucky in 1910 - a full 10 years before American women gained the right to vote. She first voted in a presidential election in 1932, for FDR. She's voted in every presidential election since, but that's all about to change due to Arizona's draconian voter ID law.

As Art Levine reported, Shirley effectively lost her right to vote when she moved to Arizona:

After living in Arizona for two years, she was eagerly looking forward to casting her ballot in the February primary for the first major woman candidate for President, Hillary Clinton. But lacking a birth certificate or even elementary school records to prove she's a native-born American citizen, the state of Arizona's bureaucrats determined that this former school-teacher who taught generations of Americans shouldn't be allowed to vote.

The state's voter ID law, passed in 2004, requires voters to show ID at the polling place and to provide proof of citizenship in order to register. But birth certificates weren't issued in 1910 in Shirley's birthplace of Clinton, KY, and her elementary school no longer exists.

Shirley appeared on the local news Monday night in Phoenix to tell her story:

She's far from the only victim of this law. The Arizona Advocacy Network reports that nearly 40,000 voter registration forms have been rejected due to inadequate proof of citizenship. And it's getting to be a national problem.

The Supreme Court gave Indiana the green light last month on its restrictive voter ID law, and other states have already or are in the process of passing similar laws. Everywhere such laws are enacted, the voting rights of thousands of Americans - especially among the poor, elderly, and minorities - are put at risk. Fortunately many other states have fended off voter ID laws, and I'm proud that People For the American Way's Democracy Campaign played a role in many of those fights. Nothing short of a concerted effort by the progressive movement over the coming years will succeed in safeguarding the right to vote.

Kolbert is president of People For the American Way



Login or Register to post comments.

120 comments

The more people that vote, the worse it is for the RepublicHUNS.

Reason number one for their war on democracy.

And that's how the Republicans have won every election since 1998- not by winning the hearts and minds of the American voter, but by suppressing the opposition vote.
And until this undemocratic strategy is dismantled, they will hold their illegitimate grip on our government.

"Fortunately many other states have fended off voter ID laws"

Do Dems or Reps run the states that are fending off these laws?

Fixing this next election is going to require some heavy heavy lifting by the repugs.

Voter suppression strategies are supposed to focus on blacks and Hispanics, especially those living in urban areas or who are poor. That's what our troops fight for, that's true patriotism, and the American way. 97 year old women and nuns aren't the intended focus, but if they have to suffer to achieve the more effective strategy of disenfranchising blacks and Hispanics, well, that's just one of the sacrifices we must make to keep republicans in power. Come-on, a little self-sacrifice people.

Well how the hell else can the Criminal republicans steal an election if they don't keep hundreds of thousands of democratic voters off the voter roles? In fact they've already helped to elect McCain; watch Greg Palast:

http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/327.html

This is not a national problem if you are a republican. It is all going according to the plan.

What's that acronym? "IOKIYAR"?

Number of past cases of illegal voting the Voter ID law was supposed to thwart: 2 in 25 years.

Number of voters that have been disenfranchised just since the law was past several months ago: seven.

Can't some pro-bono lawyers mount cases using the fact that these people are in the SSN system ... that they previously voted in US elections? Why are we screaming bloody murder about this?

These laws have been championed by the very same politicians that claim they want government off your back and government is the problem not the solution. This is a fine example of what happens when radical regressive chumps gain power and turn the clock backwards!

A little off topic but I just recently applied for a new passport, I lost my old one in a house fire in 1990. I got a valid birth cert from the city and county of San Francisco, I have lived in California all my life, I file tax returns every year. My passport has been denied until I fill out a multi-page report stating every residence I have ever resided, all kinds of info about my family, the list goes on and on. The Dumbya Regime State Department is pathetic!

The regressive right has made this country as pathetic as any banana republic in history. Perhaps there will be a positive change someday? Don't count on it, the regressive hacks don't want any interference of the tyranny they are enjoying

First nuns, and now this? Thank you right-wing Supreme Court! You totally suck!

And that's how the Repugs will win this time. If not their many tricks of voter supression ( the Repug AZ Sec of State has recently approved Diebold machines)they can refer it to the Hack Supreme Court! Or: Wouldn't it be awful if a terrist attack forced the pResident to unilaterally cancel the elections? These repugs are toast if they lose power. Too many of them could end up in prison if Democracy is permitted to win the day.

What do you want to bet she's been on the books as a democrate her whole life, and if so, would she have been allowed to"slip by" if she was a re-pud voter. CEO

What a horrible law. It's not like Arizona has a large demographic of residents that arent American citizens....

Oh, wait a minute....

OT

BUT!

FEMA gives away $85 million of supplies for Katrina victims

NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) -- FEMA gave away about $85 million in household goods meant for Hurricane Katrina victims, a CNN investigation has found.

These items, stored by FEMA, were meant for Katrina victims but were given to state and federal agencies.

1 of 3 The material -- from basic kitchen goods to sleeping necessities -- sat in warehouses for two years before the Federal Emergency Management Agency's giveaway to federal and state agencies this year.

James McIntyre, FEMA's acting press secretary, told CNN that FEMA was spending more than $1 million a year to store the material and that another agency wanted the warehouses torn down, so "we needed to vacate them."

---

Martha Kegel, the head of a New Orleans nonprofit agency that helps find homes for those still displaced by the storm, said she was shocked to learn about the existence of the goods and the government giveaway.

"These are exactly the items that we are desperately seeking donations of right now -- basic kitchen household supplies,"

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/11/fema.giveaway/index.html?eref=rss_topst...

No one could have predicted that a law designed by Republicans to keep Democrats from voting would keep Democrats from voting.

This raises my anger to "code red". What a stinking, f*cking shame. If there had been ANY evidence that there was a problem with voter fraud, I could rationalize this travisty. But having none, only the fact that these stinking, fascist republicans want to disinfranchise the lower socio-economic class...mostly Democrats...from voting is appalling.

Shame on us. Shame!!

The Voter ID Law Also Prevented Jesus From Voting

http://satiricalpolitical.com/?p=1800

maverick's gonna get snakebit in AZ come nov.

Now how is it that a woman who spent 98 years on this earth, was educated and probably as a teacher worked as a employee hired by one kind of civil service or another, not have any ID that shows she's an American citizen? You can prove your citizenship with more tahn just a birth cert. and many state agencies will find other accomodations in situations such as hers. AFter 98 years, there is NO paper trail?

Boggles the mind...

Heeeey...they have to restrict the right to vote

To preserve Democracy.

The key question: How many of those 40,000 voters were Democrats? If a study can prove a disadvantage (or advantage) for one party or the other, the court rulings can be challenged.

That woman is clearly a gay Mexican Islamo-fascist. Anyone can tell from just looking at her. We really dodged a bullet with that one. Thanks Republicans!

Well, Jay. Say you once were married and got divorced. You moved from Utah to Nevada. Guess what? You can't get a driver's license even with your birth certificate unless you can produce divorce papers. So you request your divorce papers which are on record in Californis and you get no response.

You don't have a driver's license.

If you were born in 1910 there may not be a record of your birth. Although you may be on record as having worked here there and every where how do you prove it?

How do you prove it was you?

Given the state's rights issue the Supreme Court will likely not interfere...Oh, wait a minute, forgot about that Florida thing in 2000. That one shot deal where they over ruled the Florida Supreme Court's recount decision. But, no precedent set, of course.

Yet another travisty brought to you by your friendly fascist repigs.

Wow...so the 15% Solution isn't fiction after all...this isn't good!

Maybe one solution is to start, not a voter registration campaign (although that would be a good idea) but to start a "Let's get every voter an ID card campaign.

Inform as many people as you can that you can try to help them get an ID so they can vote.

"The Arizona Advocacy Network reports that nearly 40,000 voter registration forms have been rejected due to inadequate proof of citizenship. And it’s getting to be a national problem."

I would hazard a guess that they caught 40,000 illegals trying to vote, and that the voter ID law you quote is working as intended.

Wimen aint allad ta vott

While Arizona is protected from the threat of Democrats being able to vote things are not as secure at the Port of Baltimore.

Devices to make port IDs broken
Four of 12 machines work, lawmaker tells Homeland's Chertoff
Associated Press
June 11, 2008

http://www.baltimoresun.com/business/bal-bz.twic11jun11,0,2852540.story

Well, Jay. Say you once were married and got divorced. You moved from Utah to Nevada. Guess what? You can’t get a driver’s license even with your birth certificate unless you can produce divorce papers. So you request your divorce papers which are on record in Californis and you get no response.

You don’t have a driver’s license.

If you were born in 1910 there may not be a record of your birth. Although you may be on record as having worked here there and every where how do you prove it?

How do you prove it was you?

I'm pretty sure that if my only problem was a bureaucrat wont answer the phone I could navigate my way to someone who would help. Getting a copy of your divorce papers is easier that filing for a marriage cert in some states...:-)

And like I said, there are other ways of establishing your citizenship than a birth cert...especially if her past is as long and storied as the article claims it is.

I really think its disingenuous to claim how important the right to vote is (of which I agree 100%) and then not take any precautions to make sure it's not abused. If you're not going to check ID's at the polls, the least youc an do is make sure the registrant is a citizen first. I will admit that if Arizona's law reuires both safeguards, that is a bit of overkill....but in a state with the demographics that AZ has, it makes much more sense to me that the laws be stricter than in say....North Dakota.

Maybe one solution is to start, not a voter registration campaign (although that would be a good idea) but to start a “Let’s get every voter an ID card campaign.

Inform as many people as you can that you can try to help them get an ID so they can vote.

Now that is a great idea.

Jay @ 20:

Now how is it that a woman who spent 98 years on this earth, was educated and probably as a teacher worked as a employee hired by one kind of civil service or another, not have any ID that shows she's an American citizen? You can prove your citizenship with more tahn just a birth cert. and many state agencies will find other accomodations in situations such as hers. AFter 98 years, there is NO paper trail?

Boggles the mind...

Didn't you watch the video?

She has multiple forms of identification. She just doesn't have the specific ones needed.

Keep in mind that some forms of identification expire.

This is kind of out of left or right field, but I wonder if she has a family bible with births and deaths recorded in it. Sometimes that will work for someone who is elderly and has no birth certificate.

Cheney responded with "So?"

Jay @ 32:

Well, Jay. Say you once were married and got divorced. You moved from Utah to Nevada. Guess what? You can’t get a driver’s license even with your birth certificate unless you can produce divorce papers. So you request your divorce papers which are on record in Californis and you get no response.

You don’t have a driver’s license.

If you were born in 1910 there may not be a record of your birth. Although you may be on record as having worked here there and every where how do you prove it?

How do you prove it was you?

I'm pretty sure that if my only problem was a bureaucrat wont answer the phone I could navigate my way to someone who would help. Getting a copy of your divorce papers is easier that filing for a marriage cert in some states...:-)

And like I said, there are other ways of establishing your citizenship than a birth cert...especially if her past is as long and storied as the article claims it is.

I really think its disingenuous to claim how important the right to vote is (of which I agree 100%) and then not take any precautions to make sure it's not abused. If you're not going to check ID's at the polls, the least youc an do is make sure the registrant is a citizen first. I will admit that if Arizona's law reuires both safeguards, that is a bit of overkill....but in a state with the demographics that AZ has, it makes much more sense to me that the laws be stricter than in say....North Dakota.

How does it make more sense? Do you have data on increased voter fraud in Arizona?

How does it make more sense? Do you have data on increased voter fraud in Arizona?

Dont be coy.

pissed off patricia @ 35:

This is kind of out of left or right field, but I wonder if she has a family bible with births and deaths recorded in it. Sometimes that will work for someone who is elderly and has no birth certificate.

I believe that we're about to move into the realm where conservatives start shouting that voting is a privilege and not a right.

We're on the road to seeing many more restrictions placed on voting.

xoites defends Constitution @ 24:

Well, Jay. Say you once were married and got divorced. You moved from Utah to Nevada. Guess what? You can't get a driver's license even with your birth certificate unless you can produce divorce papers. So you request your divorce papers which are on record in Californis and you get no response.

You don't have a driver's license.

If you were born in 1910 there may not be a record of your birth. Although you may be on record as having worked here there and every where how do you prove it?

How do you prove it was you?

My first thought was: Social security number, even though it's not supposed to be used for ID purposes. Still, if that's all you've got, it must mean something...especially if you're receiving the benefit.

I don't have a problem with having to prove residency...but for completely different reasons: I don't trust republicans, as they would be the first to violate the voting privilege.

I didn't know innocent until proven guilty only applied to felons and not voters.

I have a feeling that every person born before they started issuing social security numbers will have problems voting this year.

(Yes, I realize they all eventually got one for the smarty pants on this board)

For god's sake, can't they just contact Kentucky and get her info from there? She was legally registered there and has a long voting record. Could a little common sense be used once in a while?

Jay @ 38:

How does it make more sense? Do you have data on increased voter fraud in Arizona?

Dont be coy.

I'm not that cute.

I do not believe that laws should be passed that can restrict our freedoms, unless there is a documented need to do so.

Which is opposite of the typical politic wisdom and an infinite number of laws are needed in order to completely manage our lives and give us a paradise on Earth.

Perhaps we should pass some laws prohibiting leprechauns and unicorns from voting, just in case? Or would it be more prudent to worry about more important issues until it can be shown that we have a problem with leprechauns and unicorns committing voter ID fraud?

If there is a big voter fraud problem in Arizona, then where is the evidence?

Jay @ 41:

<i.I believe that we’re about to move into the realm where conservatives start shouting that voting is a privilege and not a right.

We’re on the road to seeing many more restrictions placed on voting.

Of course not...but the alternative from progressives seems to be, let there be NO restrictions on it what so ever.

You C-A-N-N-O-T lecture on the importance of voting rights, then take absolutely no protections what so ever to protect it from being abused.

Who told you that there were no protections against fraud in place?

Where did you get that idea?

This is going to end up in the Extreme Court, where we all know that just remedy will be swiftly delivered....

If somebody tried to wrongfully disenfranchise me, I would feel compelled to stop paying all taxes. If I have no representation or am not allowed to participate in in choosing the representation that I do have, I have no incentive to contribute to society. I suggest that she become as much a burden on society as she possibly can.

McCain should have her on the roles within 24 hours of hearing about this. Good PR.

The Dems should quit whining year after year about IDs and help people get them.
It's good citizenship and good politics.

this honestly makes me cry

we have a criminal administration backed up by a criminal court system

when is the revolution going to start?

"but the alternative from progressives seems to be, let there be NO restrictions on it what so ever."

That's a flat out lie. But we wouldn't expect anything less from a reich-wing GOPig.

Jay, i think you are sincere in your beliefs about how the system works, but your situation is not the same as many other people's situation.

Our system is broken.

I would like to point out to you that records can be lost or destroyed. During the 1970's a VA warehouse fire destroyed the records of 50,000 veterans.

Uncle Joe Hussein Mccarthy @ 49:

this honestly makes me cry

we have a criminal administration backed up by a criminal court system

when is the revolution going to start?

I'm afraid it won't start by banging on a keyboard (as much as I would like it to).

Dr. (terrorist fit jab) Matt @ 50:

"but the alternative from progressives seems to be, let there be NO restrictions on it what so ever."

That's a flat out lie. But we wouldn't expect anything less from a reich-wing GOPig.

It boggles the mind to think that these people believe that the system didn't work at all, for over 200 hundreds years, and no one noticed until now.

mick@12 Your analysis is correct, power never gives up anything without a fight, and at this point in history they have almost everything from a whole generation of people and resourses invested in this indeavor. You only need look at the violent crimes commited since they have been in office along with, lies, dirty tricks, and vote stealing to get into power to know that they are not, repete not going to give it up. Add the fact that the consequences of the crimes that we know they have commited, as well as the ones that may come to light, some having the death sentence involved, as well as long prison terms, and it gets hard to believe they will not take it to a bitter end. This has long been their design, and now it's "do or die" time. Hope we make it. CEO

lvogt @ 48:

McCain should have her on the roles within 24 hours of hearing about this. Good PR.

The Dems should quit whining year after year about IDs and help people get them.
It's good citizenship and good politics.

the dems are helping....but a person who is 97 years of age and has voted since 32 should not have to jump through hoops

and you dont make laws based on hypotheticals

there has never been massive voter fraud committed by illegals....never

" ... this former school-teacher who taught generations of Americans shouldn’t be allowed to vote." There, without punctuation, does appositive become negative, class. Why would she have taught such a thing, darn Nazi appeaser, communist, pinko, America-hater!?

I think they were able to find fewer than forty cases of voter fraud last election. It is a good thing they changed the law so fewer people will feel directly responsible for the end of democracy in the US.

Horst @ 56:

" ... this former school-teacher who taught generations of Americans shouldn’t be allowed to vote." There, without punctuation, does appositive become negative, class. Why would she have taught such a thing, darn Nazi appeaser, communist, pinko, America-hater!?

I saw that too. :)

xoites defends Constitution @ 57:

I think they were able to find fewer than forty cases of voter fraud last election. It is a good thing they changed the law so fewer people will feel directly responsible for the end of democracy in the US.

Now these people will have to get fake documentation, if they want to commit fraud.

Lollimom @ 52:

Uncle Joe Hussein Mccarthy @ 49:

this honestly makes me cry

we have a criminal administration backed up by a criminal court system

when is the revolution going to start?

I'm afraid it won't start by banging on a keyboard (as much as I would like it to).

i dont know...bangin on keyboards almost made lufa boys head explode

maybe if we bang harder, we can make every wingnuts head explode

this morning, i briefly heard that faux intellectual wingnut dennis praeger going off on one of obama's speeches...the one he gave in portland

he insisted that obama wants to take away everyone's right to own an suv and their right to be fat...and he cited the part in the speech when obama talks about mass transit and bike lanes

they are all totally losing it

i believe that in november, we may be witness to a mass on-air suicide

Weaseldog @ 59:

xoites defends Constitution @ 57:

I think they were able to find fewer than forty cases of voter fraud last election. It is a good thing they changed the law so fewer people will feel directly responsible for the end of democracy in the US.

Now these people will have to get fake documentation, if they want to commit fraud.

Which begs the question, why doesn't she get a forged birth certificate from a counterfeiter?

Is it perhaps because it is un-American to be forced to forge citizenship paper work to prove that you already are an American?

All 40 of them?

Wow. Think of the inconvienience.

This is typical Republikan behavior
In 2004 roughly 72 million (42.6 percent) Americans were registered Democrats, compared to 55 million (32.5 percent) Republicans and 42 million (24.8 percent) Independants. Source Wikipedia If Dems get out the vote .... They Win!!
The only way that Republikans can win is to convince people to vote against their own best interests (lying) or failing that to disenfranchise them (cheating).
It's made harder for Repugs to win when independants team up with Dems so then you see the massive voter frauds being perpetrated on people such as in Ohio and Florida.

I have a really hard time with this, I admit, because I don't understand how you can get along in life without some form of ID. How do you cash a check, for example. My Grandmother was born in 1908; she did not have any ID either, but we had to work it all out for her when it came time for her to collect Social Security and become eligible for Medicare. Her birth certificate was hard to find, because her parents changed her name afterwards and her birth date on the certificate was the date it was filed with the clerk, a full week after her birth. Wrong name, wrong date, but we still managed to get her some ID. I don't mean to sound like a Republican, I just cannot comprehend how you manage to go through life without ID.

This is something that seems a bit off to someone from outside the US. In canada, we have to be on the electoral list to vote. In order to be on the electoral list, you need to provide proof of citizenship. When you show up at your voting station, you must provide an ID that is verified against the electoral list and you vote. I'm not certain how long we have operated this way in Montreal but it doesn't seem to generate issues with people. Once you're on the electoral list, you're fine for life.

The only obstacle I can think of here is that for some reason, it is difficult for Americans to get a photo ID? For us, our medicare card provides a universal photo ID and if you can vote, you're on medicare.

Just another reason to bring in universal health care:)

CMinCA @ 64:

I have a really hard time with this, I admit, because I don't understand how you can get along in life without some form of ID. How do you cash a check, for example. My Grandmother was born in 1908; she did not have any ID either, but we had to work it all out for her when it came time for her to collect Social Security and become eligible for Medicare. Her birth certificate was hard to find, because her parents changed her name afterwards and her birth date on the certificate was the date it was filed with the clerk, a full week after her birth. Wrong name, wrong date, but we still managed to get her some ID. I don't mean to sound like a Republican, I just cannot comprehend how you manage to go through life without ID.

How do you know that she went her whole life without an ID?

Did you know that driver's licenses expire?

Did you know that if you write and mail checks to pay the water bill, they don't check your ID?

If you give a son or daughter power of attorney, then you don't need to risk a fall in public? They can do everything using their ID.

I have no trouble comprehending this situation.

Uncle Joe Hussein Mccarthy @ 55:

lvogt @ 48:

McCain should have her on the roles within 24 hours of hearing about this. Good PR.

The Dems should quit whining year after year about IDs and help people get them.
It's good citizenship and good politics.

the dems are helping....but a person who is 97 years of age and has voted since 32 should not have to jump through hoops

and you dont make laws based on hypotheticals

there has never been massive voter fraud committed by illegals....never

No shit...illegals, I would imagine...wouldn't want to be anywhere near a place where there are govt. officials, cops, etc...checkin ID's....seems counterintuitive.

This whole idea of proof of citizenship to get to vote is a stalking horse to disenfrachise potential democratic voters. It defies logic. Yeah, if I was an illegal alien, the first thing I would try to do would be to risk exposure and deportation by attempting to vote in another country. Righttttt.....

CMinCA @ 64:

I have a really hard time with this, I admit, because I don't understand how you can get along in life without some form of ID. How do you cash a check, for example. My Grandmother was born in 1908; she did not have any ID either, but we had to work it all out for her when it came time for her to collect Social Security and become eligible for Medicare. Her birth certificate was hard to find, because her parents changed her name afterwards and her birth date on the certificate was the date it was filed with the clerk, a full week after her birth. Wrong name, wrong date, but we still managed to get her some ID. I don't mean to sound like a Republican, I just cannot comprehend how you manage to go through life without ID.

Another point to consider...

In small towns, or close knit neighborhoods, there was a time when most people didn't need ID, because everyone already knew everyone.

this is the most shameful attempt of the reichwingneocons to keep
power in America. they will stoop to the lowest levels to regain
power. a major civil war is coming over this abomination.

MOST IMPORTANT..... MOST IMPORTANT.....

so please tell your black and hispanic friends to REGISTER TO VOTE BY MAIL

when the polling places are shuffled around... when the sheet-hooded police try to block your way... or reject your ID......

or the lines in the poor areas are toooo long......

REGISTER NOW AND REGISTER TO VOTE BY MAIL.....

and if her current state does not recognize her... how about her former state ?

VOTE DEM and VOTE OFTEN !!!

Hmmm. All you need is a purple finger in Iraq to vote.

She would've been 60 years old in 1970.

The US was a completely different world then. The book, 1981 was scary fiction rather than the normal state of affairs.

It was common to write and cash checks without ID. It was even more common to just use cash for purchases. A social security card would've been enough proof to get a bank account in a twon where everyone already knew you.

Children walked to and from school, by themselves, without parents freaking out. They rode bicycles without wearing expensive safety gear.

School zones had limited traffic as parents were discouraged from picking up or dropping off their kids.

Most families only owned one car. Husbands thought they weren't holding up their sense of responsibility if their wives had to work.

Blue collar jobs paid well enough to buy a nice house in a good neighborhood with a big yard.

Milkmen were still delivering milk.

Many grocery stores would deliver to the indigent.

Kids could buy booze and cigarettes if they had a note from a parent.

I suppose it's no wonder, that people can't imagine her life.

Another bummer here in AZ (I live here) is that the Maricopa Board of Sup's is meeting in a week or so with a likely move to cut the budget of the Election Commission. Which means that the sample ballot that you receive in the mail will be sent one per household instead of per voter. This will affect your proof of Identity when going in to vote, as many people show up with their driver's license and sample ballot (with their name and only their name on it). Talk about lame. If there ever was an election with the expected turnout that they are this is not one to be cutting budgets.

Last time I checked, I didn't need my birth certificate to rent a movie, Mr. Pearce.

I just emailed the Republican in the story the following message. His email address is rpearce@azleg.gov

You are a conceited thug.

No different than any gangster who would rob someone on the street if he knew he could get away with it.

That's the way politicians like you (especially Republican cowards) have to play the game. You have to limit participation because your constituency consists of corporate elitists and sorry to say...the unintelligent. It's a fact that low voter turnout helps Republicans so it certainly makes sense you would stand up for suppressing the vote.

I know this email will not change your views and will most likely cause you to dig your heels in even further regarding trying to protect your sacred office. I just wanted to take a small stand for those whose rights you seek to defraud.

Have fun on election night when your lap dog John McCain loses to an African American.

louise @ 9:

Can't some pro-bono lawyers mount cases using the fact that these people are in the SSN system ... that they previously voted in US elections? Why are we screaming bloody murder about this?

SS # is not proof of citizenship, and my card states "Not to be used for Identification". her voting records should be proof.

Allow me to sum up:

Law is passed based on premise of fighting voter fraud. No evidence of voter fraud is offered.
Evidence is offered the law is preventing law abiding Americans who predominantly vote liberal from actually voting.

Conclusion: Looking at my watch I see the big hand is on government secrecy and the little hand is on vote rigging. Its insurrection time!

72 LibertyLover Says: Hmmm. All you need is a purple finger in Iraq to vote.

Well the republicans are giving us the finger.

roger @ 76:

I just emailed the Republican in the story the following message. His email address is rpearce@azleg.gov

You are a conceited thug.

No different than any gangster who would rob someone on the street if he knew he could get away with it.

That's the way politicians like you (especially Republican cowards) have to play the game. You have to limit participation because your constituency consists of corporate elitists and sorry to say...the unintelligent. It's a fact that low voter turnout helps Republicans so it certainly makes sense you would stand up for suppressing the vote.

I know this email will not change your views and will most likely cause you to dig your heels in even further regarding trying to protect your sacred office. I just wanted to take a small stand for those whose rights you seek to defraud.

Have fun on election night when your lap dog John McCain loses to an African American.

He probably didn't read more than 4 words. Does anyone every get a response from an elected official?

Someone needs to ask that dude how many people died for the right to rent a movie or drive a car.

Unbelievable the shame these people bring upon the history of struggle in this nation and the legacy of those who made the ultimate sacrifice to secure these rights for all Americans.

richmanpoorman @ 81:

Someone needs to ask that dude how many people died for the right to rent a movie or drive a car.

Unbelievable the shame these people bring upon the history of struggle in this nation and the legacy of those who made the ultimate sacrifice to secure these rights for all Americans.

Aren't Americans dying today for our right to go shopping?

82 Weaseldog Says: richmanpoorman @ 81:

Someone needs to ask that dude how many people died for the right to rent a movie or drive a car.

Unbelievable the shame these people bring upon the history of struggle in this nation and the legacy of those who made the ultimate sacrifice to secure these rights for all Americans.

Aren’t Americans dying today for our right to go shopping?

That's why I go to Fredericks of Hollywood.

"Republicans Disenfranchising Democrats and Minorities"

Why don't we see this headline in every newspaper? Why isn't the whole world aware of this Republican voter suppression scam?

jimbo92107 @ 84:

"Republicans Disenfranchising Democrats and Minorities"

Why don't we see this headline in every newspaper? Why isn't the whole world aware of this Republican voter suppression scam?

Because the media doesn't kiss and tell?

You can bet that Republican asshole legislator was laughing up his sleeve at the thought of denying a 97-year old Democrat her right to vote. Couldn't you just hear the conservative compassion in his voice?

Weaseldog @ 82:

richmanpoorman @ 81:

Someone needs to ask that dude how many people died for the right to rent a movie or drive a car.

Unbelievable the shame these people bring upon the history of struggle in this nation and the legacy of those who made the ultimate sacrifice to secure these rights for all Americans.

Aren't Americans dying today for our right to go shopping?

Heartbreaking but true. Support the troops! Gas is expensive!

Weaseldog @ 69:

CMinCA @ 64:

I have a really hard time with this, I admit, because I don't understand how you can get along in life without some form of ID. How do you cash a check, for example. My Grandmother was born in 1908; she did not have any ID either, but we had to work it all out for her when it came time for her to collect Social Security and become eligible for Medicare. Her birth certificate was hard to find, because her parents changed her name afterwards and her birth date on the certificate was the date it was filed with the clerk, a full week after her birth. Wrong name, wrong date, but we still managed to get her some ID. I don't mean to sound like a Republican, I just cannot comprehend how you manage to go through life without ID.

Another point to consider...

In small towns, or close knit neighborhoods, there was a time when most people didn't need ID, because everyone already knew everyone.

In fact, you don't have to use your turn signal either 'cause everyone knows you, where you're going and when your gonna turn to your house. ; )

The article clearly states what this woman's problem really is. As usual, it is all Clinton's fault. She was born in Clinton, KY.

If this old lady cannot prove she was born in the U.S. she should be deported to ------ I don't know, how about Barbados? Oh, and we should probably torture her first. God bless the USA.

Jay @ 20:

Now how is it that a woman who spent 98 years on this earth, was educated and probably as a teacher worked as a employee hired by one kind of civil service or another, not have any ID that shows she's an American citizen? You can prove your citizenship with more tahn just a birth cert. and many state agencies will find other accomodations in situations such as hers. AFter 98 years, there is NO paper trail?

Boggles the mind...

If you look at the video, you'll see that they had photocopies of her drivers licenses going back looks like 60 years, they are expired and as such no longer valid, secondly the reason the law is in effect is because a drivers license isn't proof of citizenship. However a piece of paper can be faked, birth certificates can be gotten illegally or obtained from health and records around the country for 20 bucks and the answers to 3 or 4 questions. She could get registered if she wanted to be a fraud, instead because she isn't a fraud and wants to prove that she is she, she's fubared. If you outlaw voting, only outlaws will be able to vote. The problem is the law is specific enough to render 98 years worth of paper trail to so much garbage. Now the remedy would be a judge or something, but this is the slippery slope people talk about, is my right to vote greater then the right of others to restrict voting? How many citizens rights would be worth it? If i stop 100 illegals from voting and 10 citizens is that a good ratio? How about 1 to 1? What about stopping 40,000 people from voting who could, and only stopping 1000 illegal aliens from voting? Why don't we just cancel voting altogether since one vote somewhere might be an illegal vote?

Forty thousand already disenfranchised. I suppose that makes up for the--what, maybe a dozen?--voters who used fraudulent identification. A law that denies people their right to vote, on the basis of virtually no one ever having committed the fraud in the first place.

There are somewhere around 20 MILLION illegals in the United States right now, more than the entire population of many countries. Of course, any law that gets passed is going to affect a few people adversely, but there is nothing age-ist, race-ist, or sex-ist about expecting someone to prove they are Americans before allowing them to elect American officials. This is a relatively isolated and extreme case. If you want to make an omelet, expect to have to break a few eggs.

I am currently living in AZ and I went down to DLB yesterday and even with my original birth certificate they would not issue me ID. They said I need a BC from the state hospital. I am not sure what i am going to do now.

She needs to call Senator John McCain's (R-AZ) office for assistance.

capnmike @ 93:

There are somewhere around 20 MILLION illegals in the United States right now, more than the entire population of many countries. Of course, any law that gets passed is going to affect a few people adversely, but there is nothing age-ist, race-ist, or sex-ist about expecting someone to prove they are Americans before allowing them to elect American officials. This is a relatively isolated and extreme case. If you want to make an omelet, expect to have to break a few eggs.

If only there was one less you.

capnmike @ 93:

There are somewhere around 20 MILLION illegals in the United States right now, more than the entire population of many countries. Of course, any law that gets passed is going to affect a few people adversely, but there is nothing age-ist, race-ist, or sex-ist about expecting someone to prove they are Americans before allowing them to elect American officials. This is a relatively isolated and extreme case. If you want to make an omelet, expect to have to break a few eggs.

I take you have never voted before: It is not about proving that you are a US citizen, it is the fact that the system to check the citizenship is borked and arbitrary.

Thanks for your comments, but we were also from a small town, only 100 families, our grandparents were first generation American. We didn't lock our doors or our car doors either. My point is, when you start getting older, you do need ID to obtain Social Security and Medicare, (to simplify the example). If you ever filed a tax return, with or without a spouse, you need a Social Security number. It seems to me that you would have had at least have obtained that form of ID by now. Maybe she doesn't realize that she does have ID. Doesn't she have a voter's registration card?

(Yes, I realize this woman is 98 years old. My other grandmother was born in 1910 and didn't learn to drive until 1980 - they're the same age, so I can conceptualize their circumstances.) Even is this woman has never had a driver's license, she can obtain an ID card from the DMV. In these small towns, people have baptismal records and the Mormon Church has records on everyone - Mormon or non-Mormon. Also, in these small towns, the church members would help her fill out forms, provide transporation, I'm sure. She shouldn't give up, but find out what she needs to do to exercise her right to vote.

Am I being naive or am I missing something? I don't think so.

For those voters who need assistance with identification, the League of Woman Voters is there for you, as well as your County Clerk's office.

Vote Absentee! What will they make you do? Send a photocopy of your D/L?

Wonder if voter ID law is a sham, especially for older American citizens...Bushie says he "understands" America's economic and civil struggle, but it's more like Homer Simpson saying, "just because I don't care, doesn't mean I don't understand." In Bushie's case, it would be: "Just because I like my billionaire corporate cronies better, doesn't mean I don't understand the struggling of middle-class/regular America." Still, he probably doesn't understand the middle class anyway, since he has such executive priveledge under his family and the Skull & Bones Society to "change his diapers" and pardon him every step of the way, seemingly immune from impeachment.

Just to tweak the paranoids....We tend to think that in the modern age this can't happen to us. But imagine a fire at the Yourtown Hall of Records...then the computer files of any "valid" records get wiped....Maybe it happens in swaths of heavily Democratic or Republican voting districts....It's easy to imagine.

The Republican Party the Party that believes only " CITIZENS" may vote.

My (late) paternal grandmother, born in 1904, would be in the same boat. She was born at home, never drove* or held a passport, was a housewife, paid cash for everything, never even made a will, and after my grandfather died left all business to my oldest uncle. Jewish people do not have an equivalent to baptismal certificates.

My mother, OTOH, has her naturalization papers, and given the way things are going now, she carries a certified copy with her.

*BTW, in her youth, driver's licenses came with the car, and were proof of nothing in particular, not even basic competence behind the wheel.

She could get a passport, albeit with some difficulty.

From DKos:

If you do NOT have a previous U.S. passport or a certified birth certificate, you will need:

1. Letter of No Record

Issued by the State with your name, date of birth, which years were searched for a birth record and that there is no birth certificate on file for you.

1. AND as many of the following as possible:

* Baptismal certificate
* Hospital birth certificate
* Census record
* Early school record
* Family bible record
* Doctor's record of post-natal care

However, this is completely asinine. As are some people defending the system stopping her from voting. Her providence is impeccable. Rethugs only win when they stop people from voting.

"There are somewhere around 20 MILLION illegals in the United States right now, more than the entire population of many countries. Of course, any law that gets passed is going to affect a few people adversely, but there is nothing age-ist, race-ist, or sex-ist about expecting someone to prove they are Americans before allowing them to elect American officials. This is a relatively isolated and extreme case. If you want to make an omelet, expect to have to break a few eggs."

I was just waitiing for that stupid argument.

"This is a relatively isolated and extreme case."

So is voter fraud. Your position is indefensible.

I guess the next step is to set up prison camps for these non-citizens.

Sieg Heil.

The repubs can't win any other way, so if they pass enough voters laws perhaps they'll have a chance. That's the only reason for these laws - to keep certain people from voting.

We need another 1000 stories like this to hit the air.

According to the new standards, George Washington (among others) should have not been allowed to vote, much less serve as president. He was not a U.S. citizen when he was born (the U.S. didn't exist yet). I doubt he could have produced any "modern" proofs of birth (family bibles probably would not pass muster). And on and on.

.

R E M E M B E R:

THEY(sic) HATE US FOR OUR FREEDOMS...
... And so THEY(sic) Legislate away our FREEDOM to vote.

.

The Arizona Advocacy Network reports that nearly 40,000 voter registration forms have been rejected due to inadequate proof of citizenship.

Republican Mister Burns from the Simpsons(rubbing hands together gleefully), "It's working perfectly!"

Update: I heard broader version of this story last night. It seems that this woman did have a driver's license at one time, (but being 98 years old, no longer possesses one). That being said, the claim is that she does not possess the "right kind of ID" to vote. So, I was being naive and quite ignorant. My apologies. This must be infuriating for those who are being discriminated against.

Can McCain really afford to lose his peer group as voters?

I guess we'll find out. Personally, I'd love to see McSame lose his home state.

Voter ID is not all bad, but the failure of a law to provide workarounds in this type of case is anti-American.

You democrats need to start coming up with better excuses for losing. "I can't believe they passed a law requiring you to prove you're american to vote in an election." This is the best you got? I like this one too: "Did you see that ballot? It had names on the left AND the right. I was so confused!" It's hysterical that you're complaining about voter fraud concidering voter fraud got your man JFK elected. How many times should they have recounted in Florida? 3 wasn't enough? Oh, you just wanted 1 that went the other way. Sorry. Can't you get it through your thick skulls that many people in the US don't want socialism? That we went to history class and learned that it didn't work so well? That this country just so happened to start going downhill when insane liberal policies started taking effect? I was also wondering; how you can put the lives of convicted murderers ahead of unborn children? Kill anything as long as its still in her stomach, but don't you dare touch that guy that raped and murdered his 3 daughters. Give him 3 square meals, cable TV, and don't forget the air conditioning. Doesn't that seem a little, I don't know, wrong? But what can you expect when the leaders of your party are liars (Clintons), jflwuiosgsdhdfhgfwj;cjwfnhfhj oops (sorry about that, had snipers shooting at me), and pill-popping, adulterous, alcoholic, 'accidental' killers (Kennedy's). Thats quite the leadership. That's about all the time I got here, but since I don't want you to be mad at me, I'll give you some advice. Don't get into a car..............................or for that matter a plane............................let's just say vehicle (who knows whats next) with a Kennedy at the wheel, except if they're taking you to vote.

One disenfranchised voter versus the hundreds of fake voters ACORN signed up falsely. I'm disenfranchised that DIMocrats have to find fake votes in order to win elections, utilize the mainstream liberal media to present one false side to every story, and to try to change election law post-election because they don't like the outcome, a la Florida in 2000.

I'm disenfranchised that the socialists are foisting a Marxist, con man on the American people and telling us that if we don't vote for him we're all racist. I'm disenfranchised that I'm being told I'm cold hearted if I don't rant and rave for the forced confiscation of more wealth of others to fund the pet projects of the hyperempathetic, to put it nicely.

Screw you, socialists. Socialism isn't progressive. It's tried and failed so many times prior to now, that it's simply unimaginable that a new generation of fools would fall for the old, stodgy, leftists professors who keep saying that if we just try it one more time, socialism will work.

That's disenfranchisement.

And I'm sure it's not the first time this numbskull had been told her identification was inadequate, and it's not the first time she had the need, and the opportunity to obtain adequate identification over the last 70 plus years since she was an adult.

So since there is one exception to the rule we need to throw out all laws requiring a person to show that they actually have a legal right to vote? Or do we permit anybody to vote, regardless of how many times they may vote or they have the mental capacity to vote, or the legal right to vote, just because we don't want to disnfranchise one old lady?

Just because leftists lose elections every time they're truthful about their goals (unlike this election with the con-man socialist saying whatever his audience wants to hear, as long as he has a teleprompter with a flowery speech projected towards him), doesn't mean we need to allow any and all fake votes from ACORN and their ilk to enable them to steal elections. Since making up election rules after the election because you're behind after numerous recounts, and getting the Supreme Court to agree with the constitution and state law, despite the best efforts of a state supreme court to change those laws, it must be frustrating that you can't just make up rules like they do in Velezuela, Iran, etc. But you're working your way towards that goal, aren't you, you marxist fools?

Kent in Tehachapi @ 100:

Vote Absentee! What will they make you do? Send a photocopy of your D/L?

They make you register with the county recorder's office well in advance of the election which is this woman's basic problem..

She waited too long, and now expects it to be somebody else's emergency. Register early. It's actually against the law to move to AZ and then wait more than 30 days to get a state-issued ID.

and people like lou dobbs thinks this law would help keep "illegal immigrants" from voting??? ummm hello. they can't vote at all so why have a law like this one?? it's a fascist law to keep minorities away from voting. fuck lou dobbs and his supporters.

120 comments

Login or Register to post comments.