The religious right warms up to McCain

It's hard to overstate the extent to which the religious-right movement and its leaders have not gotten along with John McCain. It's not just that they preferred other candidates during the Republican primaries; it's that they actively and publicly hated the guy.

Consider an example. In October, the Family Research Council hosted a "Values Voter Summit," and nearly all Republican candidates showed up to kiss the movement's ring, touting their faith and their commitment to religious-right issues. At the end of the conference, organizers held a straw poll -- and McCain came in dead last with just 1.4 percent support. McCain did even worse than Rudy Giuliani, who supports abortion rights and gay rights.

The whole "agents of intolerance" thing was apparently tough to get over. It's hard for a candidate to "Sister Souljah" conservative evangelical activists, and then seek their support two cycles later. The religious right may be crazy, but it's a movement with a long memory.

That, however, was before Barack Obama won the Democratic nomination, and started earning enough support to possibly split the evangelical vote. All of a sudden, McCain doesn't look so bad anymore.

Conservative evangelical leaders met privately this week to discuss putting aside their misgivings about John McCain and coalescing around the Republican's presidential bid while urging him to consider social conservative favorite Mike Huckabee as a running mate.

About 90 of the movement's leading activists gathered Tuesday night in Denver for a meeting convened by Mathew Staver, who heads the Florida-based legal advocacy group Liberty Counsel.

Many evangelical leaders backed other GOP candidates early on and remain wary of McCain's commitment to their causes and his previous criticisms of movement leaders. But with the presidential field now set, many evangelical leaders are taking a more pragmatic view, realizing also that the Democratic candidate, Barack Obama, is making a strong play for evangelical voters and talking freely about his faith.

Christian conservative leaders? Choosing pragmatism over principles? You don't say.



Login or Register to post comments.

71 comments

Republican operatives is more like it, Christians?, what a load

The Religious right should be careful Jesus is returning someday and he'll running as a Democrat.

I wonder which they are more afraid of, an Obama win or a McCain win without their endorsement? Either would mean a massive loss of influence, but the latter would leave them with a president with a bit of a vindicative side...

More like 'Swift Boat Christians for (fill in your favorite "R" candidate here)'

HAPPY FOURTH EVERYONE!

If Senator Obama can split the religious right by scooping off the ones who aren't the bizarre members, hey that's just more votes for the good guy.

They still haven't sorted out their 'misgivings about George Bush'.

pissed off patricia @ 5:

HAPPY FOURTH EVERYONE!

If Senator Obama can split the religious right by scooping off the ones who aren't the bizarre members, hey that's just more votes for the good guy.

I wonder if that means "crazy town" would lose its status as a significant voting block. Especially if Obama is setting himself up to appeal to those with Christian values instead of those who are politically Christian.

Today of all days, we should have a couple of million of us marching on the Bastille.

But alas

AndrewK @ 7:

pissed off patricia @ 5:

HAPPY FOURTH EVERYONE!

If Senator Obama can split the religious right by scooping off the ones who aren't the bizarre members, hey that's just more votes for the good guy.

I wonder if that means "crazy town" would lose its status as a significant voting block. Especially if Obama is setting himself up to appeal to those with Christian values instead of those who are politically Christian.

If that is what Senator Obama is doing, it just might work. I'm okay with it, for sure.

OK, this religious right stuff is about the blathering of the, as the late Jack Anderson and Mike Royko both called them, "The Hallelujah Boys."

McCain gets the Hallelujah boys and Obama gets the "paying customers" in the pews.

Hmmm, seems a tad different this time around.

The value-voters ain't go no values. Morals? Fuck them too!

That's all this country needs now - another president sucking the dicks of religious wackos. Hasn't bush done enough to get us to the rapture?

From out here it looks like Racial Bigotry by the Value Voters.
It should be no surprise that such opinionated people would be so hypocritical.

Just another reason for all us to hang tough with Obama and stop this sudden emergence of "know it all" bloggers and others who get all bent out of shape if Barack does not say exactly what they want, every day on every issue. The urgency of assuring Obama is elected could not be clearer. He is using all his wit and energy to position himself effectively for the election. Let's stay together and help him otherwise we'll end up extending the dominance of the nut jobs in this country.

sgtmajor @ 14:

Just another reason for all us to hang tough with Obama and stop this sudden emergence of "know it all" bloggers and others who get all bent out of shape if Barack does not say exactly what they want, every day on every issue. The urgency of assuring Obama is elected could not be clearer. He is using all his wit and energy to position himself effectively for the election. Let's stay together and help him otherwise we'll end up extending the dominance of the nut jobs in this country.

I agree, we need to keep focused.

You would not want Huckabee to be a heartbeat away from the presidency... his tenure as Governor of Arkansas has seen incomes and jobs decline; the state has fewer educated professionals than any other, fewer college graduates, fewer women in business, and more poverty than you can imagine.

If the model for America's future is Arkansas, welcome to your new third-world country, folks. Oh, and happy 4th of July.

sgtmajor @ 14:

Just another reason for all us to hang tough with Obama and stop this sudden emergence of "know it all" bloggers and others who get all bent out of shape if Barack does not say exactly what they want, every day on every issue. The urgency of assuring Obama is elected could not be clearer. He is using all his wit and energy to position himself effectively for the election. Let's stay together and help him otherwise we'll end up extending the dominance of the nut jobs in this country.

I was about to say, Amen, but I guess it's better to say I agree with you on every point.

McCain has flip-flopped on every issue there is, but let Obama change one bit and the press is ALL over it.

I guess the religious right was against McCain before they were for him.

Flip-floppers!

The religious right needs to be marginalized. Ridiculed in a manner that excludes them from our halls of power (political or otherwise).

Demand people start talking sense!

And again, Obama should be careful who he courts as in the process he may lose non-religious people who are turned off by religion. He warned of "inaunthentic" "transparent" "expressions of faith" and how it's "dangerous" for progressive to adopt religious terminology.

(see the comments in the Obama Matthew 25 blog)

Jesus prefers white-skinned war-mongers.

I'm not religious but I don't put myself above anyone who is. Senator Obama's true supporters aren't going to turn away just because he appeals to people of faith. They know we have too much to lose with McCain in the white house. They know this election is about so much more than that.

Christian conservative leaders?

"Vile, worthless scum" is more like it.

Today in the Palm Beach Post it said that our gov. Charlie Crist is getting married. It has been said that he could not be McCain's veep because Crist was gay. So no one knows what to make of this upcoming marriage. I have some thoughts, but I better keep them to myself.

Ib think when they found out that their dear 'Uncle Sam' was going to conyinue paying them money all of a sudden he's not so bad after all.

"'The only evangelicals that will support Obama are the ones who haven't read their Bible,' Burress said."

Man, I hate this mentality. Because the Bible can be interpreted in an infinite number of ways depending on what context or emphasis you put on the text. With that said, I wish we could get to a point in our nation where our legal and political decisions weren't made based on a book written several hundred years ago, canonized for political rather than spiritual reasons, and the root cause of all of the bloodshed and suffering in the world for the last few thousand years.

Can we just judge our candidates based on their proposals, principles, perceived integrity (after all they are politicians and have none), and political history? I know that's asking the average Joe Blow a lot when he has American Idol and the latest episode of Cop Drama to watch, two jobs to work, and 3 kids to take around to all their extra-curricular activities, but people need to realize that these political choices have a direct impact on the rest of their daily lives.

Oh well, I know I'm preaching in a vacuum.

Ex-Canuck @ 12:

That's all this country needs now - another president sucking the dicks of religious wackos. Hasn't bush done enough to get us to the rapture?

amen to that! lets hope obama doesnt get a message from god to attack iran, we allready have one idiot who heard the lord wisper in his ear , attack iraq george, now we know it was just cheny throwing his voice and laughing later as he said what a moroon!

All these born-agains have a dirty secret. They all found Jesus in court ordered AA and NA meetings. Most of them actually have black cavities in their brains from all the drugs and booze. This is why they are all so crazy.

Anyone who thinks McSame doesn't look bad needs an eye exam in the worst way. Some people love to put their brains on hold and follow along behind any idiotic fucktard. This is one more case of the blind leading the blind.

MAJeff @ 23:

Christian conservative leaders?

"Vile, worthless scum" is more like it.

Amen to that!!

♠Bangkok Bob♥ @ 13:

From out here it looks like Racial Bigotry by the Value Voters.
It should be no surprise that such opinionated people would be so hypocritical.

It looks like this no matter what angle you look at it because that's exactly what's going on here.

Ironically, Obama seems to be a more devout Christian than McCain, whose "faith" seems to be of the "political necessity" variety.

So... what could the fundies' problem with Obama be, then?

Floridiot @ 8:

Today of all days, we should have a couple of million of us marching on the Bastille.

But alas

I tried, but decided to turn back when I hit Bermuda.

The funny thing is that Obama is the one who has a clear testimony about being born again as a Christian. That is unless you define Christian as someone who trusts Christ as their saviour, is against abortion and against equal rights for gays.

So now these people have to tell their flock, “Never mind what I’ve said about McSenile in the past. I was wrong and he’s a man of God after all.” I’m sure that will be well received and will not affect their credibility in the slightest.

Perhaps not so to the religious conservatives but during last year's National Review hosted Ship of Fools, McCain was...

A bell rings somewhere, and we are all beckoned to dinner. We have been assigned random seats, which will change each night. We will, the publicity pack promises, each dine with at least one National Review speaker during our trip.

To my left, I find a middle-aged Floridian with a neat beard. To my right are two elderly New Yorkers who look and sound like late-era Dorothy Parkers, minus the alcohol poisoning. They live on Park Avenue, they explain in precise Northern tones. "You must live near the UN building," the Floridian says to one of the New York ladies after the entree is served. Yes, she responds, shaking her head wearily. "They should suicide-bomb that place," he says. They all chuckle gently. How did that happen? How do you go from sweet to suicide-bomb in six seconds?

The conversation ebbs back to friendly chit-chat. So, you're a European, one of the Park Avenue ladies says, before offering witty commentaries on the cities she's visited. Her companion adds, "I went to Paris, and it was so lovely." Her face darkens: "But then you think – it's surrounded by Muslims." The first lady nods: "They're out there, and they're coming." Emboldened, the bearded Floridian wags a finger and says, "Down the line, we're not going to bail out the French again." He mimes picking up a phone and shouts into it, "I can't hear you, Jacques! What's that? The Muslims are doing what to you? I can't hear you!"

Now that this barrier has been broken – everyone agrees the Muslims are devouring the French, and everyone agrees it's funny – the usual suspects are quickly rounded up. Jimmy Carter is "almost a traitor". John McCain is "crazy" because of "all that torture". One of the Park Avenue ladies declares that she gets on her knees every day to "thank God for Fox News". As the wine reaches the Floridian, he announces, "This cruise is the best money I ever spent."

And people are questioning if questioning his military service to see if McCain is qualified to be president is out of bounds.

Conservatives were calling him crazy last year. Does anyone believe anything has really changed about him aside from his body-snatching of George W. Bush?

Steve @ 34:

The funny thing is that Obama is the one who has a clear testimony about being born again as a Christian. That is unless you define Christian as someone who trusts Christ as their saviour, is against abortion and against equal rights for gays.

I've looked for Jesus' statements about abortion and gays but have never been able to locate them. Maybe some helpful biblical scholar can help me out.

Ironic, isn't it? These "Christians" don't forgive too easy, do they?

Rusty Bombshell Video Shackleford @ 37:

Steve @ 34:

The funny thing is that Obama is the one who has a clear testimony about being born again as a Christian. That is unless you define Christian as someone who trusts Christ as their saviour, is against abortion and against equal rights for gays.

I've looked for Jesus' statements about abortion and gays but have never been able to locate them. Maybe some helpful biblical scholar can help me out.

Thats in that part of the bible that only Christian leaders on the right are allowed to see by god. All the little people aren't allowed to see that part because you couldn't understand it, and who then would lead the flock.

Rusty Bombshell Video Shackleford @ 37:

Steve @ 34:

The funny thing is that Obama is the one who has a clear testimony about being born again as a Christian. That is unless you define Christian as someone who trusts Christ as their saviour, is against abortion and against equal rights for gays.

I've looked for Jesus' statements about abortion and gays but have never been able to locate them. Maybe some helpful biblical scholar can help me out.

Yehoshua never spoke of them. The anti-gay and anti-abortion crowd plays to popular prejudices and can only find a few scriptures, some 6 I believe that refer to homosexual practices and ignore the hundreds that speak to heterosexual practice and come to the conclusions that they do. Biblically, gays and abortion are non-issues, it's only a few loons that seem to think they are all that there is to the Faith.

James @ 26:

"'The only evangelicals that will support Obama are the ones who haven't read their Bible,' Burress said."

Man, I hate this mentality. Because the Bible can be interpreted in an infinite number of ways depending on what context or emphasis you put on the text. With that said, I wish we could get to a point in our nation where our legal and political decisions weren't made based on a book written several hundred years ago, canonized for political rather than spiritual reasons, and the root cause of all of the bloodshed and suffering in the world for the last few thousand years.

Can we just judge our candidates based on their proposals, principles, perceived integrity (after all they are politicians and have none), and political history? I know that's asking the average Joe Blow a lot when he has American Idol and the latest episode of Cop Drama to watch, two jobs to work, and 3 kids to take around to all their extra-curricular activities, but people need to realize that these political choices have a direct impact on the rest of their daily lives.

Oh well, I know I'm preaching in a vacuum.

As a Christian, I wholeheartedly agree. The first statements remind me of the Rabbinic law of interpretation that any verse in Torah can be correctly interpreted 77 ways. As a Christian, raised in Evangelical Protestantism, it's clear that we Protestants ought to adopt that rule from the Jews, as Protestants with their "clear scripture" are divided much worse than any other Christian wing.

39 diamondmc

Yeshua ben Joseph being Jewish himself would probably hold to Jewish tradition regarding abortion.

According to Jewish tradition, which mayn't be uniform over all groups, there are two periods at which a baby may be considered alive. In Genesis, it says, and I'm paraphrasing, G-d breathed the breath of life into Adam, and he became a living soul. In other words, Adam wasn't alive until he was breathing.

Another tradition says a foetus isn't alive until the period of quickening, which is when the little bugger starts breakdancing in his mother's womb.

However, the baby was considered the father's property even before birth, although it would only inherit it's Jewishness from the mother in the case of a mixed marriage. Additionally, the phrase commonly translated into "Thou shalt not suffer a Witch to live," more accurately would be translated as poisoner. I think that's arguing semantics, since Witches were considered to be brewers of poison. An herbal concoction that could heal one person could kill another. Additionally, rival leaders commonly poisoned each other (at least in Greece and Rome), and who would they buy the poison from?

However, the "poisons" could be used to cause spontaneous abortion and that would've caused concerns too in a patriarchal society. Even though daughters were less valuable, they were often bartering chips to marry into better society. In Genesis, Chapter 19, Verses 1-7, he Biblical patriarch Lot tried to offer his underaged virgin daughters to a rapacious mob to save some angels.

ysbaddaden @ 42:

39 diamondmc

Yeshua ben Joseph being Jewish himself would probably hold to Jewish tradition regarding abortion.

According to Jewish tradition, which mayn't be uniform over all groups, there are two periods at which a baby may be considered alive. In Genesis, it says, and I'm paraphrasing, G-d breathed the breath of life into Adam, and he became a living soul. In other words, Adam wasn't alive until he was breathing.

Another tradition says a foetus isn't alive until the period of quickening, which is when the little bugger starts breakdancing in his mother's womb.

However, the baby was considered the father's property even before birth, although it would only inherit it's Jewishness from the mother in the case of a mixed marriage. Additionally, the phrase commonly translated into "Thou shalt not suffer a Witch to live," more accurately would be translated as poisoner. I think that's arguing semantics, since Witches were considered to be brewers of poison. An herbal concoction that could heal one person could kill another. Additionally, rival leaders commonly poisoned each other (at least in Greece and Rome), and who would they buy the poison from?

However, the "poisons" could be used to cause spontaneous abortion and that would've caused concerns too in a patriarchal society. Even though daughters were less valuable, they were often bartering chips to marry into better society. In Genesis, Chapter 19, Verses 1-7, he Biblical patriarch Lot tried to offer his underaged virgin daughters to a rapacious mob to save some angels.

I would have also mentioned the trial by ordeal and Yahweh's commands to the Israelites to rip pregnant women open on many occasions. To go strictly by the Bible the way Protestants and Sadducees do (or in the case of the latter, did), there's precious little to state that abortion is a condemned practice.

41 General_Rennenkampf Says:

As a Christian, I wholeheartedly agree. The first statements remind me of the Rabbinic law of interpretation that any verse in Torah can be correctly interpreted 77 ways.
_____________________________________________________________________

Isn't that one of the basis for Gematria?

I have to admit I can't get the hang of that.

It also sounds reminiscent of a someone who asked Yesua how many times he can forgive another, 10 times? And Yeshua answered 10 times 10 would be just the beginning.

ysbaddaden @ 44:

41 General_Rennenkampf Says:

As a Christian, I wholeheartedly agree. The first statements remind me of the Rabbinic law of interpretation that any verse in Torah can be correctly interpreted 77 ways.
_____________________________________________________________________

Isn't that one of the basis for Gematria?

I have to admit I can't get the hang of that.

It also sounds reminiscent of a someone who asked Yesua how many times he can forgive another, 10 times? And Yeshua answered 10 times 10 would be just the beginning.

Exactly right. Biblical interpretation, or interpretation of religious texts, period, is never a cut-and-dry ironclad thing. Interpretation has as much gray as black and white and deciding which is which is the art of it.

As for getting the hang of it, if you look at it, there may be different levels of interpretation from one person, whereas another person may see entirely different levels. The way both being correct goes is that insofar as both can see and clearly understand, that they are correct owing to their common humanity and the mindset that humanity brings.

They're about as Christian as the Taliban and Al Qaeda are Muslim.

They'll do whatever it takes to advance their inhumane policies.

Screw those hypocrites.

I Like Pie @ 28:

All these born-agains have a dirty secret. They all found Jesus in court ordered AA and NA meetings. Most of them actually have black cavities in their brains from all the drugs and booze. This is why they are all so crazy.

Just like our president!

43 General_Rennenkampf

Could you cite a scriptural reference where YHVH orders the Isrealites to rip open the bellies of pregnant women? I suspect Joshua, where supposedly Moses's successor was "divinely" ordered to slaughter inhabitants of towns that already surrendered.

The 77 ways also reminds me of the Qabbalah which has 22 pathways, 10 sephiroths, and three emanations above the top sephiroth Kether (crown). If I remember correctly the emanations were called ain soph aur, ain soph, ain. I always found that soph curious, in that it sounds like a basis for the later Christianized Qabbalah figure of Sophia (wisdom). She seemed to replace Shekhina the wife of YHVH, who now wanders with the Israelis, and is curiously linked to the terrestial Adam's first wife Lilith, now considered so evil (Adam Kadman is not terrestial). However, it's my understanding that Lilith may be linked to both the High Priestess of the Tarot cards as well as the second sephiroth from the bottom, Yesod which is above Malkuth. This would make Lilith the first step to achieving wisdom.

What makes this ironic is there's a church of Saint Sophia (perhaps a euhemerized figure) that was the scene of a nasty slaughter, where Roman Catholic Crusaders slaughtered the accomadating Greek Orthodox hosts.

However, I'm having some trouble regarding a figure called Eve the Elder, who was created while Adam was awake, but he was grossed out by the sight of YHVH almost Frankenstein like manner of creation. What do you know about that?

I just try to learn enough about religion to bug the fundies.

General_Rennenkampf @ 45:

ysbaddaden @ 44:

41 General_Rennenkampf Says:

As for getting the hang of it, if you look at it, there may be different levels of interpretation from one person, whereas another person may see entirely different levels. The way both being correct goes is that insofar as both can see and clearly understand, that they are correct owing to their common humanity and the mindset that humanity brings.

Well, the problem comes in the fact that until god appears himself/herself/itself to clarify exactly what he/she/it meant, we only have our flawed interpretations on which to base our beliefs.

Ultimately, my point is that we cannot use "faith" in this sense as a basis for our political discourse and decisions as it is neither logical nor pragmatic to attempt to create one law based on a myriad of interpretations.

On another note, I get a kick out of these far right religious and fascistic groups with names like "Liberty Council", "Constitution Party", and "American Liberty League", who's real aim is to destroy liberty and the Constitution and impose a fascistic corporate Christian theocracy on the rest of us.

ysbaddaden,

There is also a Gnostic belief that Eve was actually first (as a manifestation of Sophia) and that Adam was somehow created from her or created by her, or created at her request.

I find parallels to this in science if we consider that all human beings are created female in the womb, only later differentiating their genders.

That shows that these religious leaders are not really that religious and without principles. They are in reality politicains playing and participating in a beneficial political game under the guise of religion.

50 James

The original Eve sounded similar to the Green Eurynome, whose lover was the snake. Upon getting pregnant she gave birth to the world. All over the Middle-East are variations of her name generally meaning life or the earth. Some of the Gnostic sects were like to think thus. Additionally, although a father may be unknown, we all pretty much know who our mothers are.

The whole Adam and Eve story seems to come from Babylon where the Gods created the human race as essentially a slave race to tend paradise, and later the rest of the world.

I know I've bugged fundies with my comparison of the passion of Christ to Dionysian theatrical elements which are: Agon, Threnos, Pathos, Anagnoresis and Apotheosis (Presentation a birth or an appearance before village elders, fear usually the night before boinking a high priestess or sacrificing one's own life, the actual sacrifice, the ritual wailing for the lost savior, and then then savior being assimilated to the godhead).

I generally don't bring up that the the jars of vinegar present at Yeshua's crucifixion. That appears to be morin, a wine/vinegar derived from mandrake used as a pain killer in ancient Jerusalem according to Josephus. In I believe, Matthew, Mark and John they mention Yeshua crying out for water, and getting a sop of vinegar. It's generally taught in churches as the final insult from the Jewish "mobs" to Yeshua, denying a dying man water, but they were trying to kill his pain. An interesting effect of morin is it can also cause someone to go into a catalyptic swoon, appearing to be dead, only to recover later.

Could that be the basis of the resurrection story?

But I have to go now. My dial-up is bogging down, and I'm already a couple of hours behind in my yearly re-reading of the constitution.

James @ 49:

General_Rennenkampf @ 45:

ysbaddaden @ 44:

41 General_Rennenkampf Says:

As for getting the hang of it, if you look at it, there may be different levels of interpretation from one person, whereas another person may see entirely different levels. The way both being correct goes is that insofar as both can see and clearly understand, that they are correct owing to their common humanity and the mindset that humanity brings.

Well, the problem comes in the fact that until god appears himself/herself/itself to clarify exactly what he/she/it meant, we only have our flawed interpretations on which to base our beliefs.

Ultimately, my point is that we cannot use "faith" in this sense as a basis for our political discourse and decisions as it is neither logical nor pragmatic to attempt to create one law based on a myriad of interpretations.

On another note, I get a kick out of these far right religious and fascistic groups with names like "Liberty Council", "Constitution Party", and "American Liberty League", who's real aim is to destroy liberty and the Constitution and impose a fascistic corporate Christian theocracy on the rest of us.

ysbaddaden @ 48:

43 General_Rennenkampf

Could you cite a scriptural reference where YHVH orders the Isrealites to rip open the bellies of pregnant women? I suspect Joshua, where supposedly Moses's successor was "divinely" ordered to slaughter inhabitants of towns that already surrendered.

The 77 ways also reminds me of the Qabbalah which has 22 pathways, 10 sephiroths, and three emanations above the top sephiroth Kether (crown). If I remember correctly the emanations were called ain soph aur, ain soph, ain. I always found that soph curious, in that it sounds like a basis for the later Christianized Qabbalah figure of Sophia (wisdom). She seemed to replace Shekhina the wife of YHVH, who now wanders with the Israelis, and is curiously linked to the terrestial Adam's first wife Lilith, now considered so evil (Adam Kadman is not terrestial). However, it's my understanding that Lilith may be linked to both the High Priestess of the Tarot cards as well as the second sephiroth from the bottom, Yesod which is above Malkuth. This would make Lilith the first step to achieving wisdom.

What makes this ironic is there's a church of Saint Sophia (perhaps a euhemerized figure) that was the scene of a nasty slaughter, where Roman Catholic Crusaders slaughtered the accomadating Greek Orthodox hosts.

However, I'm having some trouble regarding a figure called Eve the Elder, who was created while Adam was awake, but he was grossed out by the sight of YHVH almost Frankenstein like manner of creation. What do you know about that?

I just try to learn enough about religion to bug the fundies.

@ Ysbaddaden: Hosea 13:16 is the citation I'm thinking of. Biblically, the death of a woman doesn't bother Yahweh as much as the death of a man does. Odd, that, to me. I consider myself civilized and whether Tanakh or New Testament, the Bible never has much positive to say about 50% of the human race.

You're referring in the reference to the slaughter in the Hagia Sophia to the Fourth Crusade? That was one of the most shameful times of a very shameful time in Church history, when many of the best and brightest of the Western Church felt killing gained salvation. What made it really bad was that the Byzantine capital they sacked was far more advanced than any Western city at the time. Westerners have never been especially bothered about things like that, though.

Eve the Elder is a Talmud-Apostolic Tradition story that Yahweh first designed a woman before Lillith and Eve. That woman became such a stench to Adam that he was put to sleep, and then came Lillith, whom Adam rejected as well, before finally Eve. However Adam and Eve are a myth written to explain the tribal origins of nomads, and I hardly see the relevance of that myth to the modern day. It's no more and no less relevant than the Haida myth or the Kokiji tale of Izanami and Izanagi.

@ James: That's my way of thinking, too. Secularism is capable of updating and adapting better than Western religion is, though Islam has proven surprisingly capable of adapting despite operating from a virtually identical standpoint as Christianity and Judaism. Hence, if Westerners want to avoid the stagnation of Medieval society, the secular ideals need to be kept.

And I don't consider "Christian conservatism," as anything but the religious half of an American fascism.

ysbaddaden @ 52:

50 James

The original Eve sounded similar to the Green Eurynome, whose lover was the snake. Upon getting pregnant she gave birth to the world. All over the Middle-East are variations of her name generally meaning life or the earth. Some of the Gnostic sects were like to think thus. Additionally, although a father may be unknown, we all pretty much know who our mothers are.

The whole Adam and Eve story seems to come from Babylon where the Gods created the human race as essentially a slave race to tend paradise, and later the rest of the world.

I know I've bugged fundies with my comparison of the passion of Christ to Dionysian theatrical elements which are: Agon, Threnos, Pathos, Anagnoresis and Apotheosis (Presentation a birth or an appearance before village elders, fear usually the night before boinking a high priestess or sacrificing one's own life, the actual sacrifice, the ritual wailing for the lost savior, and then then savior being assimilated to the godhead).

I generally don't bring up that the the jars of vinegar present at Yeshua's crucifixion. That appears to be morin, a wine/vinegar derived from mandrake used as a pain killer in ancient Jerusalem according to Josephus. In I believe, Matthew, Mark and John they mention Yeshua crying out for water, and getting a sop of vinegar. It's generally taught in churches as the final insult from the Jewish "mobs" to Yeshua, denying a dying man water, but they were trying to kill his pain. An interesting effect of morin is it can also cause someone to go into a catalyptic swoon, appearing to be dead, only to recover later.

Could that be the basis of the resurrection story?

But I have to go now. My dial-up is bogging down, and I'm already a couple of hours behind in my yearly re-reading of the constitution.

Not really, when the Romans wanted somebody to be dead, they ensured their deaths. Crucifixion was much more horrible than the electric chair. The Resurrection story's origins from a secular perspective are much better understood that Yehoshua had such a powerful grip on His followers that they could not believe He was dead. From the religious perspective, of course, He was Yahweh and was Resurrected. From a secular perspective, it was likely mass hallucinations combined with a Jim Jones-style grip on a small group of people that in 300 years had emerged into a full-blown religion. I prefer the religious version, but then I've been raised Christian.

As for the mystery religions, Christianity gradually evolved into a pacifistic Jewish mystery religion until Theodosius I gave it the shot in the arm needed to emerge from Yehoshua's iron grip and the pacifist state to Great Religion status.

Happy 4th everyone!

This was inevitable, the sheep will always come home to the magic bean peddler...

Religious Right & Republican stupidity...you can set your watch by it...

I knew they would.

54 General_Rennenkampf

Well I know there was a spear thrust, where blood and water poured out, now traditionally given to a legionnaire named Longinius, but many scholars see this as a later versiod of Hod, the blind man who instigated by Loki, accidentally killed the Viking God Balder. However Balder is supposed to return after Ragnarrok to start the race of Gods and the creation of man over again, in an almost eastern style form of cyclical eschatology.

Additionally, the Romans started breaking the legs of those crucified, but part of the story of Yeshua was he died unusually fast, although it probably still lasted hours, and his legs were never broken. Therefore, if he did revive from a catalyptic swoon he may've survived.

Although I've always wondered about lead poisoning from the nails maybe killing him at the time of the supposed Whitsunday.

given by a legionnaire named Longinius.

LOL the religious right is trying to throw their ideals under the bus.

Actually it was my understanding that Lilith rejected Adam, because of his insistence on the missionary position and her to assume a subordinate status. Lilith split from Adam and was pursued by the angels Sanvai, Sasanvai and Semangeloff (must've been a damn Ruskie). They tried to convince her to return to Adam, but she refused. She ended up living next to the Red Sea with the demon Samael, by whom she gave birth to a hundred babies a day, than G-d would destroy a hundred babies a day. I don't know how she got rid of her stretch marks.

YHVH eventually destroyed all or most of her kiddies, and she grew jealous of Eve and her children (mankind) and vowed to destroy them with the aid of her lilim. Her kids was one way of explaining the presence of demons in the world, besides the fallen angels. Cain may've been the father of demons, or at least of all monsters, or the rest of the human races after he went into the wilderness and mated with demons.

I knew this was coming and it would only be a matter of time before these crooks sucked it up. They'll talk first, then approach McCain's campaign to cut a deal and offer an endorsement. Expect a small series of flips and flops coming from McCain that will play up to their side next, and finally the crooks will be sending letters and emails to their sheep telling them to vote repub.

The split is starting to scare these guys. They're already losing some of the money now they stand to lose political influence unless they get a deal set up. Personally I think its a joke to call any of these people "religious" leaders. God is the last thing on their minds.

Interesting spending the 4th of July discussing religious arcana, the Constitution while listening to Joan Jett singing if I want to touch her there.

These guys are not religious. Religion is their Corporate Business. It is their product to attain wealth and power. They are a trade organization that rally their customers selling salvation, fear, and personal superiority. People of true faith are humble, tolerant and eager to serve. These guys are no different than Wall Street players. They want to be instrumental in the election to attain governmental influence and handouts for their businesses, just like big Pharma, the oil industry, the telecoms, etc. Everything about the men that comprise this group of players is antiethical to every major faith.

61 Gretchen Says

Personally I think its a joke to call any of these people “religious” leaders. God is the last thing on their minds.
__________________________________________________________________________

Actually, they're worshippers of Mammon

Me?

I'm a worshipper of

Mammaries.

ysbaddaden @ 64:

61 Gretchen Says

Personally I think its a joke to call any of these people “religious” leaders. God is the last thing on their minds.
__________________________________________________________________________

Actually, they're worshippers of Mammon

Me?

I'm a worshipper of

Mammaries.

Hah! That's what my pastor said a week ago... the Mammon thing. Not the mammaries. That's your thing.

chad @ 38:

Ironic, isn't it? These "Christians" don't forgive too easy, do they?

Christians who preach hate, greed and intolerance?

I read the New Testament twice, and most of what Jesus talked about was helping the poor and sick (liberals), while condemming the money changers and religious "sellouts" (today's republicans).

Delusional irony anyone, or just plain hypocricy of an exponential magnitude???

I'm past caring about the religious right. We should ignore them. Realize, 30% of Americans are lost to their brainwashing, and won't change: we won't ever change them.

Given that Obama is going after the religious vote, the traditional leaders of the Christian right must be getting pretty scared that they could lose their ability to herd their sheep. They cannot have religious people not voting the way they tell them to vote. They cannot afford not to rally behind McCain.

Phillip @ 68:

Given that Obama is going after the religious vote, the traditional leaders of the Christian right must be getting pretty scared that they could lose their ability to herd their sheep. They cannot have religious people not voting the way they tell them to vote. They cannot afford not to rally behind McCain.

Actually, therein is the real root of their fear of Obama (or any Democrat that looks like he/she could pull voters away from their "flock").

General_Rennenkampf @ 40:

Rusty Bombshell Video Shackleford @ 37:

Steve @ 34:

The funny thing is that Obama is the one who has a clear testimony about being born again as a Christian. That is unless you define Christian as someone who trusts Christ as their saviour, is against abortion and against equal rights for gays.

I've looked for Jesus' statements about abortion and gays but have never been able to locate them. Maybe some helpful biblical scholar can help me out.

Yehoshua never spoke of them. The anti-gay and anti-abortion crowd plays to popular prejudices and can only find a few scriptures, some 6 I believe that refer to homosexual practices and ignore the hundreds that speak to heterosexual practice and come to the conclusions that they do. Biblically, gays and abortion are non-issues, it's only a few loons that seem to think they are all that there is to the Faith.

Thank you, General. That's what I thought.

The religious Right NUTTY hypocrites and haters would warm up to any old, hot tempered, man that can't think for himself and is a huge flip-Flopper.

71 comments

Login or Register to post comments.