TOPICS

Pelosi came out swinging against Joe Lieberman.  She said that if the Democrats win enough seats in the Senate then bye-bye Joe from any leadership position he might have held. That's why he's hooked himself onto McCain's boots.

(h/t Scarce)



Login or Register to post comments.

149 comments

'bout damn time.

I knew Nancy would get upset with Joe! Helping the Republican is her job, not Joe. Not enough room for 2 big turncoat!

So where did that video go? Pelosi better come out swinging about something because she is going to face a challenge herself. Put impeachment back on the table where it belongs. Remember Nancy some of us worked are asses off to get you folks in control and to hold the Bush administration thugs (Lieberman is one of the thugs) ACCOUNTABLE. We are watching and waiting

Pelosi is Speaker of the House. Does she actually have any say about Senate commitees? Well kudos anyway for sort of standing up to Lieberman.

So long Joe LIEberman.

Don't let the door hit ya' where Yaweh split ya'!

Nancy, why don't you stay on your side of the fence in the HOUSE and do your damn job!!!??? You have no moral standing to criticize anyone including Joe Lie0Berman until you start impreachment procedures. You have no credibility whatsoever. So, Shut the hell UP!!!

Nancy is getting her head handed to her by her constituents back home.

The democratic voters are in open revolt with the leadership. ALL the Democratic Senators are getting the same stuff back home. HEALTHCARE, UNEMPLOYMENT, FUEL and not putting a stop to this Administration's BULLSHIT.

Good for her. I don't know how much good what she said will do but at least she called him out on what he said.

I heard a woman on Fox say that while McCain was a POW the other POWs called him "Hell's Angel" because he would defy the guards and hold church services for the other prisoners. I have never heard that story before.

It took exactly 1 hour and 10 minutes for that video to disappear - so who monitors information at you tube?

Lieberman is an Independent. What is she talking about?

So basically Pelosi is pulling a 2006. If you vote Democrat - change will happen.

Fool me once, can't be fooled again.

Vid is no longer available.

Chairmanships in PERIL?!?!

Benedict Lieberman is already on the McCain's short list for VP.

What the hell does he have to do to be removed from the Chairmanship...take a dump on Nancy's desk?

Too late, Nancy. You had over 2 years. Time for you to go in 2010.

Exactly the kind of empty rhetoric I would expect from Nancy Peolosi - the "Democrat" who keeps Impeachment off the table, and who refuses to even READ the articles of Impeachment that have been entered.

What she says may or may not be true. The critical aspect of this statement is that she has no authority or responsibility in the matter, and is simply blowing smoke in an effort to placate the masses who are fed up with her spineless "leadership".

Too bad she's not this tough with Chimpy.

Take impeachment off the table? Screw you, Pelosi.

pissed off patricia @ 8:

Good for her. I don't know how much good what she said will do but at least she called him out on what he said.

I heard a woman on Fox say that while McCain was a POW the other POWs called him "Hell's Angel" because he would defy the guards and hold church services for the other prisoners. I have never heard that story before.

POP
That story is on the front page of this morning's McCain Chicago Tribune. I laughed out loud when I saw it. What's next? He sent Jonas Salk the original recipe for the polio vaccine? He invented Yahtzee? Or maybe he's the thirteenth apostle?

Pah!

I'll believe it when I see it. As Speaker of the House, she effectively has no authority over the Senate, thanks to Article I of the Constitution's little clause that each chamber of the legislature makes its own rules. Just what can the Speaker of the House do to a Senator?

Kathleen @ 3:

So where did that video go? Pelosi better come out swinging about something because she is going to face a challenge herself. Put impeachment back on the table where it belongs. Remember Nancy some of us worked are asses off to get you folks in control and to hold the Bush administration thugs (Lieberman is one of the thugs) ACCOUNTABLE. We are watching and waiting

Amen to that!

pissed off patricia @ 8:

Good for her. I don't know how much good what she said will do but at least she called him out on what he said.

I heard a woman on Fox say that while McCain was a POW the other POWs called him "Hell's Angel" because he would defy the guards and hold church services for the other prisoners. I have never heard that story before.

Neither have I...in fact, I've never heard of ANY POW's that were there with him say anything about McBain.

Why is she so concerned about maintaining her majority when they aren't doing anything with it anyway. She can bend over for Bush just as easily from a minority position, and at least then she would have an excuse for doing it.

17 General_Rennenkampf Says: Pah!

I’ll believe it when I see it. As Speaker of the House, she effectively has no authority over the Senate, thanks to Article I of the Constitution’s little clause that each chamber of the legislature makes its own rules. Just what can the Speaker of the House do to a Senator?

--------

All for show to help her reelection campaign in San Francisco.

Sad really. Last couple months she has called out Bush, Cheney and now Lieberman with hollow words.

Lieberman has been campaigning with McCain for over a year - did not hear boo. Couple months from November - squawk squawk squawk.

Is she gonna tell him to leave the table?

Joey DD @ 12:

Is this the same video?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aF8BdG5yNWA

Thanks bet that is it.

Pelosi "they will not need him (Lieberman)"

Pelosi "Lieberman has said some irresponsible things about Obama". Hell Joe Lieberman has endlessly said irresponsible things about Iran. And the MSM never ever challenges him or McCain when they repeat unsubstantiated claims about Iran. Just wonder why that is? Aipac
Joe Lieberman on Iran
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBu40kp6Y8g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJ1GxhB6jgs

Lieberman is a draft dodger but is more than willing to send your relative into unnecessary and immoral wars. If it is up to Lieberman and McCain the next stop is Iran.

nancy can take her sorry ass with sad sack joe.

she's a bigger disgrace than joe imho.

Dr. Toxic @ 1:

'bout damn time.

Actually, no, it is not. It's way too late.

In fact, even if that moron Pelosi wanted
to impeach Cheney & Bush now, that would
be too late.

http://www.shirley08.com/

Yellow Elephant Safari @ 16:

pissed off patricia @ 8:

Good for her. I don't know how much good what she said will do but at least she called him out on what he said.

I heard a woman on Fox say that while McCain was a POW the other POWs called him "Hell's Angel" because he would defy the guards and hold church services for the other prisoners. I have never heard that story before.

POP
That story is on the front page of this morning's McCain Chicago Tribune. I laughed out loud when I saw it. What's next? He sent Jonas Salk the original recipe for the polio vaccine? He invented Yahtzee? Or maybe he's the thirteenth apostle?

The whole POW thing is getting old. I have never, ever, seen a POW try to use his imprisonment as some sort of "credential" or badge of honor (shield against the left) the way McCain's supporters do. Folks, its shameless to all the other POW's. And, this credential was established 40 years ago. I would say its almost irrelevant but Clark was right, just because McCain was a POW, that doesn't mean he has the cred to be Pres.

I think the people who took impeachment "off the table" should lose their leadership posts.

Oh, wait. That would be Nancy. This was a really stupid subject for Nancy to address. She's in the House. Lieberman's a Senator. She has nothing to say about committee personnel in the Senate and she should keep her mouth shut on the subject.

Harry Reid (the worst Senate Majority Leader ever?) is unlikely to imperil his own position by messing with Lieberman now.

"Nancy is getting her head handed to her by her constituents back home."

I'm not sure the reacion is that strong, but Cindy Sheehan made the ballot, and I've seen several bumper stickers with her name. Expect a few thousand protest votes aimed at getting Nancy's attention. Mine will be one of them. Nothing else works.

So her next move it to send Lieberman a sternly worded letter, right? Then he has to stand in the corner for a half hour and think about what he did. That's about what bush said about Putin this morning. Putin has been a very bad boy too.

If the leadership has any pride left at all they will--when the time is ripe--fire Lieberman out of a cannon as far away from the Democratic Party as possible.

why....now whats the strategic timing on this

surfjac @ 26:

Yellow Elephant Safari @ 16:

pissed off patricia @ 8:

Good for her. I don't know how much good what she said will do but at least she called him out on what he said.

I heard a woman on Fox say that while McCain was a POW the other POWs called him "Hell's Angel" because he would defy the guards and hold church services for the other prisoners. I have never heard that story before.

POP
That story is on the front page of this morning's McCain Chicago Tribune. I laughed out loud when I saw it. What's next? He sent Jonas Salk the original recipe for the polio vaccine? He invented Yahtzee? Or maybe he's the thirteenth apostle?

The whole POW thing is getting old. I have never, ever, seen a POW try to use his imprisonment as some sort of "credential" or badge of honor (shield against the left) the way McCain's supporters do. Folks, its shameless to all the other POW's. And, this credential was established 40 years ago. I would say its almost irrelevant but Clark was right, just because McCain was a POW, that doesn't mean he has the cred to be Pres.

Or that he has the mental capacity either.

Wow, the video has already been taken down? Shame, I really wanted to see this one.

Who decides which videos stay and which ones get taken down? Is it like an administrator at youtube?

harley @ 21:

17 General_Rennenkampf Says: Pah!

I’ll believe it when I see it. As Speaker of the House, she effectively has no authority over the Senate, thanks to Article I of the Constitution’s little clause that each chamber of the legislature makes its own rules. Just what can the Speaker of the House do to a Senator?

--------

All for show to help her reelection campaign in San Francisco.

Sad really. Last couple months she has called out Bush, Cheney and now Lieberman with hollow words.

Lieberman has been campaigning with McCain for over a year - did not hear boo. Couple months from November - squawk squawk squawk.

Now that actually does make sense. I mean, really...

the idea of Speaker Pelosi telling a Senator to lose his position, considering the attitude of Senators towards Representatives would be hilarious if it wasn't so goddamn meaningless.

Another one of her diversionary moves, this. She has no say about how the Senate runs itself. Meanwhile, while she's publicly pretending to be a Democrat, word is she's going to allow a vote on offshore drilling.

Yes, Lieberquisling is an unconscionable, self-serving little toad, but it's her position that needs to be in the deepest jeoprody.

And by "swinging" you mean "flailing her arms with her eyes closed going 'ehnn ehnn ehnn!'."

Stop threatening, chiding, whining...etc. Nancy...and friggin' DO SOMETHING REALITY BASED! Below, from Ezra Kelin...it looks like the traitorous Lieberman CAN BE KICKED OFF ALL HIS COMMITTEE POSITIONS WITHOUT BLOWBACK!!!!!!!

Marc Ambinder asks:
If John McCain selects Joe Lieberman as his vice presidential ticket-mate, does Harry Reid kick Lieberman out of the Senate Democratic conference, thus, potentially, transferring power to Republicans for a few months?

No. Lieberman can't pull a Jeffords; in 2001, Democrats coaxed Republicans members of the Senate into passing an organizing resolution that allowed for control of the body to shift when Senators switched caucuses, as happened with Jeffords. There's no such clause in the current organizing resolution, and while Lieberman and the Republicans could get 51 votes between them and Cheney in favor of a new organizing resolution, Reid could easily filibuster it and retain control. So essentially, there's no way short of a 10 member swing toward the Republicans that control over the Senate will shift before January 2009.

pissed off patricia @ 34:

Who decides which videos stay and which ones get taken down? Is it like an administrator at youtube?

Well, I did a search at Youtube, and they still have a version up. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aF8BdG5yNWA

Not sure why the particular one above won't work. Maybe it's just for me. ;)

BTW, Cindy Sheehan for Congress.

Pelosi scolding Lieberman, is like Bush telling Putin to knock it off.

Hypocrisy is an equal opportunity employer in this country, I guess it doesn't discriminate between Dem or GOP.

We need a Jeffersonian revolution to be rid of the entire lot of them, with the exception of Kucinich and a very few others.

Nancy Fat Cat Pelosi must go.

General_Rennenkampf @ 17:

Pah!

I'll believe it when I see it. As Speaker of the House, she effectively has no authority over the Senate, thanks to Article I of the Constitution's little clause that each chamber of the legislature makes its own rules. Just what can the Speaker of the House do to a Senator?

I don't think that Pelosi has ever actually READ the Constitution.

whoa, pelosi is finally starting to listen to her base. she has to keep swinging before faith in her is restored. she may not care what we think, but she needs to remember that we are the voting public.

The height of hypocrisy was Nancy (the first female speaker of the House) writing a book about the power women have while kneeling and kissing george bush's lying ass.

liberalNmoderation @ 19:

pissed off patricia @ 8:

Good for her. I don't know how much good what she said will do but at least she called him out on what he said.

I heard a woman on Fox say that while McCain was a POW the other POWs called him "Hell's Angel" because he would defy the guards and hold church services for the other prisoners. I have never heard that story before.

Neither have I...in fact, I've never heard of ANY POW's that were there with him say anything about McBain.

Actually a few fellow POWs have come forth saying that they can't vote for McCain in full conscience. Last week a POW that was smeared in McCain's book called him on his shit, and basically labeled the old fuck as a bold faced liar.

His nickname in the Hanoi Hilton seems to have been "song bird." BTW, lest not forget that he signed off all that anti-American propaganda while in Prison. He was surely coerced into the Vietnamese propaganda, however he is not the one to play the hero card now... esp. since he has been quite forthcoming in his support for torture, which sort of erased any integrity he must have had as a POW.

Also, in the old days getting captured by the enemy wasn't really considered an heroic feat...

Can_You_Hear_Me_Now_? @ 43:

General_Rennenkampf @ 17:

Pah!

I'll believe it when I see it. As Speaker of the House, she effectively has no authority over the Senate, thanks to Article I of the Constitution's little clause that each chamber of the legislature makes its own rules. Just what can the Speaker of the House do to a Senator?

I don't think that Pelosi has ever actually READ the Constitution.

It is just a piece of paper after all... George told her so, and since he is the prisidint he must know!!!

[Deleted. Sneering condescension-Sitemonitor]

It's to late for Pelosi. She's a Bush enabler and really needs to go. If the Dems are given overwhelming majorities in November ALL the leaders should be swept out. We need some hardworking, hard fighting, progressive Dems in there ready to challenge and get things done!

Micheal Scheuer's latest on Lieberman's efforts and how the I Lobby has Obama and McCain licking their feet .

The Lobby Like No Other Wants a War Like No Other

By Michael Scheuer(Michael Scheuer is a 22-year veteran of the CIA and the author of Imperial Hubris: Why the West Is Losing the War on Terror.

McCain is an Israel-firster of the deepest hue. Coached by Joe Lieberman – who argues there is a U.S. duty to ensure God's promise to Abraham about Israel is kept – McCain is now considering Republican Congressman Eric Cantor for his running mate. Rep. Cantor, needless to say, is eager to spend American blood and treasure to secure Israel. Speaking in Israel, Cantor pushed the same false assertion that is the staple of U.S. leaders in both parties. "What befalls Jerusalem," Cantor said, "threatens the security of the United States and its allies worldwide. That's because Jerusalem and Israel are Ground Zero in the global battle between tyranny and democracy, radicalism and moderation, terrorism and freedom."

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20510.htm

Tyler Durden @ 46:

liberalNmoderation @ 19:

pissed off patricia @ 8:

Good for her. I don't know how much good what she said will do but at least she called him out on what he said.

I heard a woman on Fox say that while McCain was a POW the other POWs called him "Hell's Angel" because he would defy the guards and hold church services for the other prisoners. I have never heard that story before.

Neither have I...in fact, I've never heard of ANY POW's that were there with him say anything about McBain.

Actually a few fellow POWs have come forth saying that they can't vote for McCain in full conscience. Last week a POW that was smeared in McCain's book called him on his shit, and basically labeled the old fuck as a bold faced liar.

His nickname in the Hanoi Hilton seems to have been "song bird." BTW, lest not forget that he signed off all that anti-American propaganda while in Prison. He was surely coerced into the Vietnamese propaganda, however he is not the one to play the hero card now... esp. since he has been quite forthcoming in his support for torture, which sort of erased any integrity he must have had as a POW.

Also, in the old days getting captured by the enemy wasn't really considered an heroic feat...

I don't think it is today either. I guess if any of his fellow POWs came out now and spoke against him they would be accused of swift boating him.

Nancy's timing with this 'tough talk' ...is all about nancy(and a gal named cindy)..and
nothing to do with Joe.

Tyler Durden @ 47:

Can_You_Hear_Me_Now_? @ 43:

General_Rennenkampf @ 17:

Pah!

I'll believe it when I see it. As Speaker of the House, she effectively has no authority over the Senate, thanks to Article I of the Constitution's little clause that each chamber of the legislature makes its own rules. Just what can the Speaker of the House do to a Senator?

I don't think that Pelosi has ever actually READ the Constitution.

It is just a piece of paper after all... George told her so, and since he is the prisidint he must know!!!

I'd like a good trimming of the executive branch, too.

Can_You_Hear_Me_Now_? @ 43:

General_Rennenkampf @ 17:

Pah!

I'll believe it when I see it. As Speaker of the House, she effectively has no authority over the Senate, thanks to Article I of the Constitution's little clause that each chamber of the legislature makes its own rules. Just what can the Speaker of the House do to a Senator?

I don't think that Pelosi has ever actually READ the Constitution.

You're probably correct. Her actions seem to show, at any rate.

Alice X - (Chomsky Nader) - status quObama - change you can pretend in - @ 42:

We need a Jeffersonian revolution to be rid of the entire lot of them, with the exception of Kucinich and a very few others.

Nancy Fat Cat Pelosi must go.

So...you like the spoils system? Jefferson had better PR than Jackson, but in terms of political corruption, the two were identical.

foutsc @ 48:

[Deleted. Sneering condescension-Sitemonitor]

Lieberman is a Traitor to the Constitution to the truth and to the people that he is willing to sacrifice for his bloody unnecessary wars (he did not serve and none of his children or grandchildren have served in the military. He is a yellow bellied chickenhawk.

if you listen to the interview, Pelosi isn't saying she'd take away his committee leadership, she was wondering what the Senate would do when they have enough votes where they can afford to ditch him.

I won't apologize for Pelosi on impeachment though. She needs to listen to more than the DLC/DNC.

Is Pelosi stupid?

You don't tell him that till we don't need him.

pissed off patricia @ 34:

Who decides which videos stay and which ones get taken down? Is it like an administrator at youtube?

May be Joe's formal complaint to Youtube/Google a few months back is now paying dividends.

Mayday @9"
"It took exactly 1 hour and 10 minutes for that video to disappear - so who monitors information at you tube?"

Something's going on with the embeds. If you go to YouTube, you can watch it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aF8BdG5yNWA

A chance to finally see Pelosi show some guts and integrity, and the video is unavailable!
Her remarks, whatever they are, still don't make up for her stand against impeachment.

trevor-es @ 57:

pissed off patricia @ 34:

Who decides which videos stay and which ones get taken down? Is it like an administrator at youtube?

May be Joe's formal complaint to Youtube/Google a few months back is now paying dividends.

Did he really make a formal complaint to them? About what?

bob @ 58:

Mayday @9"
"It took exactly 1 hour and 10 minutes for that video to disappear - so who monitors information at you tube?"

Something's going on with the embeds. If you go to YouTube, you can watch it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aF8BdG5yNWA

Maybe they (YouTube) want viewers to come to their site to see the videos instead of allowing them to be shown at other sites.

paranoia @ 2:

I knew Nancy would get upset with Joe! Helping the Republican is her job, not Joe. Not enough room for 2 big turncoat!

Bump

About time the blood sucker, Libo, gets kicked in his ignorant, traitor ASS.

So now that Condi is playing hall monitor in Georgia, what is there left for Lieberman and Graham to do when they arrive? Maybe they can get in some shopping time. Hell, Condi would probably like to go along too.

Around March it was on C&L:
YouTube responds to Lieberman’s calls for censorship: Thanks, but no thanks

pissed off patricia @ 60:

trevor-es @ 57:

pissed off patricia @ 34:

Who decides which videos stay and which ones get taken down? Is it like an administrator at youtube?

May be Joe's formal complaint to Youtube/Google a few months back is now paying dividends.

Did he really make a formal complaint to them? About what?

sheeesh! mccain doesn't wear "boots"! He wears really expensive loafers!

shaggles @ 4:

Pelosi is Speaker of the House. Does she actually have any say about Senate commitees? Well kudos anyway for sort of standing up to Lieberman.

Good point. She's all in favor of strong actions in the Senate, where she has no power, but when it comes to similar actions in the chamber she has control over, she's all "I don't know nothing, I just work here." Beh...

Alice X - (Chomsky Nader) - status quObama - change you can pretend in - @ 42:

We need a Jeffersonian revolution to be rid of the entire lot of them, with the exception of Kucinich and a very few others.

Nancy Fat Cat Pelosi must go.

Electoral Reform. No change in how we elect representatives, no change at all.

trevor-es @ 65:

Around March it was on C&L:
YouTube responds to Lieberman’s calls for censorship: Thanks, but no thanks

pissed off patricia @ 60:

trevor-es @ 57:

pissed off patricia @ 34:

May be Joe's formal complaint to Youtube/Google a few months back is now paying dividends.

Did he really make a formal complaint to them? About what?

Sweet! I guess someone at YouTube has indeed read the constitution and believes in what it says.

[Deleted. Sneering condescension-Sitemonitor]

pissed off patricia @ 69:

trevor-es @ 65:

Around March it was on C&L:
YouTube responds to Lieberman’s calls for censorship: Thanks, but no thanks

pissed off patricia @ 60:

trevor-es @ 57:

Did he really make a formal complaint to them? About what?

Sweet! I guess someone at YouTube has indeed read the constitution and believes in what it says.

Few have actually read the Constitution. People tend to have a political philosophy, and just think that the Constitution mandates it. But they haven't actually read or studied the Constitution.

Liberal AND Proud @ 7:

Nancy is getting her head handed to her by her constituents back home.

The democratic voters are in open revolt with the leadership.

I'll believe that when I see an official recall petition being circulated in San Francisco. You have a recall mechanism in California don't you? Well, that means if the Democratic grass roots really want a different speaker, just start putting some resources into a Pelosi recall. It won't go very far before November, but at least some people might start paying attention.

Tyler Durden @ 47:

Can_You_Hear_Me_Now_? @ 43:

General_Rennenkampf @ 17:

Pah!

I'll believe it when I see it. As Speaker of the House, she effectively has no authority over the Senate, thanks to Article I of the Constitution's little clause that each chamber of the legislature makes its own rules. Just what can the Speaker of the House do to a Senator?

I don't think that Pelosi has ever actually READ the Constitution.

It is just a piece of paper after all... George told her so, and since he is the prisidint he must know!!!

Proof that the so called "constitution" is just a piece of paper: http://www.buildfreedom.com/tl/tl07a.shtml

Karen @ 72:

pissed off patricia @ 69:

trevor-es @ 65:

Around March it was on C&L:
YouTube responds to Lieberman’s calls for censorship: Thanks, but no thanks

pissed off patricia @ 60:

Sweet! I guess someone at YouTube has indeed read the constitution and believes in what it says.

Few have actually read the Constitution. People tend to have a political philosophy, and just think that the Constitution mandates it. But they haven't actually read or studied the Constitution.

Everyone should have to take some courses in Constitutional Law. I did back when I was in college and I thought they were the best courses of all the legal courses I took.

kabuki

If there were as many copies of the Constitution floating around out there and being read, as there are bibles, this country would be a hell of a lot better off.

she has no credibility. what is the difference between giving Bush everything he wants and then stamping your little feet and write angry letters or simply embracing the neocon pillaging? the result is the same: Bush does as he pleases. At least Holy Joe isn't hypocritical about it. Which is sort of like taking great pride in war crimes - it may be honest, but it's still disgusting.

Alice X - (Chomsky Nader) - status quObama - change you can pretend in - @ 43:

We need a Jeffersonian revolution to be rid of the entire lot of them, with the exception of Kucinich and a very few others.

Nancy Fat Cat Pelosi must go.

When it becomes common knowledge that their funding is acquired through threat of murder they will all disappear.

pissed off patricia @ 76:

Karen @ 72:

pissed off patricia @ 69:

trevor-es @ 65:

Sweet! I guess someone at YouTube has indeed read the constitution and believes in what it says.

Few have actually read the Constitution. People tend to have a political philosophy, and just think that the Constitution mandates it. But they haven't actually read or studied the Constitution.

Everyone should have to take some courses in Constitutional Law. I did back when I was in college and I thought they were the best courses of all the legal courses I took.

Incidentally, do you think that the 10th Amendment might prove an effective source to stop the constant expansion of bureaucracy? I mean, it's right there and waiting for anybody to use it to point it at the Bush gang of clowns...

Not that I want to picture it

Butt, what about her seat?

This is just another meaningless statement from Miss Nancy. Come January 2009, Joe's leadership will be gone because the dems will have enough seats to dispose of him.

Pelosi's paychecks should be "off the table".

pissed off patricia @ 76:

Karen @ 72:

pissed off patricia @ 69:

trevor-es @ 65:

Sweet! I guess someone at YouTube has indeed read the constitution and believes in what it says.

Few have actually read the Constitution. People tend to have a political philosophy, and just think that the Constitution mandates it. But they haven't actually read or studied the Constitution.

Everyone should have to take some courses in Constitutional Law. I did back when I was in college and I thought they were the best courses of all the legal courses I took.

Did those courses ever mention Lysander Spooner?

81 General_Rennenkampf

Incidentally, do you think that the 10th Amendment might prove an effective source to stop the constant expansion of bureaucracy? I mean, it’s right there and waiting for anybody to use it to point it at the Bush gang of clowns…
________________________________________________________

I doubt it, most amendments, and probably some laws have language to the effect of: "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." They generally do this by creating agencies and sub-agencies thus creating the bureaucracy.

Max Weber, who prefered bureaucracy with civil service exams made the argument that the only other alternatives were nepotism and spoils.

ysbaddaden @ 86:

81 General_Rennenkampf

Incidentally, do you think that the 10th Amendment might prove an effective source to stop the constant expansion of bureaucracy? I mean, it’s right there and waiting for anybody to use it to point it at the Bush gang of clowns…
________________________________________________________

I doubt it, most amendments, and probably some laws have language to the effect of: "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article." They generally do this by creating agencies and sub-agencies thus creating the bureaucracy.

Max Weber, who prefered bureaucracy with civil service exams made the argument that the only other alternatives were nepotism and spoils.

Another alternative is the system that sustained the Chinese empire for millennia. Unfortunately, the Chinese system is prone to stagnation of a much deadlier sort than what currently exists now in the US or what Brezhnev brought to the USSR.

But the 10th Amendment, which states that all powers not expressedly delegated to the federal government are delegated to the states and the people, might provide a wedge into the bureaucracy that otherwise might create a system of 1970s Soviet inefficiency if things keep moving the way their moving.

I call bull.

Nancy Pelosi has no authority to even make such a statement. This rings as a hollow attempt to divert attention away from her own shortcomings and inaction as House speaker.

And if it didn't come to pass, what would she do? Nothing, because she has no power to--and that would be her excuse, pure and simple.

Ooo Ooo Ooo a Sternly Worded Poop.

pissed off patricia @ 78:

If there were as many copies of the Constitution floating around out there and being read, as there are bibles, this country would be a hell of a lot better off.

Actually...I think the entire planet would be better off if the bible had never been written.

liberalNmoderation @ 90:

pissed off patricia @ 78:

If there were as many copies of the Constitution floating around out there and being read, as there are bibles, this country would be a hell of a lot better off.

Actually...I think the entire planet would be better off if the bible had never been written.

I'm not so sure...something else would have come along in its place, and no guarantees that it would have been as relatively easy to defang as Christianity.

Monotheism, let alone evangelical monotheism like Christianity or Islam, was a genie that was going to pop out of the bottle sometime, after all, we have it in a nonChristian context in both India and a pre-Columbian indigenous religion in the American continent.

Joe won the election as an independent then switch back his party to being a Democrats. Nancy is treading lightly to rock Bush plans because of Lieberman. This is where principle is in question. So I ask you this question:

Is it better to let Joe and the prestige of being the first woman speaker of the house go out the door and let the Republican have majority of the house, or to tread lightly and keep the speaker of the house for the Democrats?

I personally think it would have been better to let Joe go and risk losing the majority. So that whatever shitty job they are doing will strongly turn the tide in favor of Democrats.

General_Rennenkampf @ 91:

liberalNmoderation @ 90:

pissed off patricia @ 78:

If there were as many copies of the Constitution floating around out there and being read, as there are bibles, this country would be a hell of a lot better off.

Actually...I think the entire planet would be better off if the bible had never been written.

I'm not so sure...something else would have come along in its place, and no guarantees that it would have been as relatively easy to defang as Christianity.

Monotheism, let alone evangelical monotheism like Christianity or Islam, was a genie that was going to pop out of the bottle sometime, after all, we have it in a nonChristian context in both India and a pre-Columbian indigenous religion in the American continent.

I never understood sacrificing virgin into the volcano. Sounds like something a jilted man would think of. I am all for sacrificing bad leaders into the volcano. Whatever religion that foster that, I will believe in a heart beat! Some reggae music and drum beats, and food aplenty while tossing the warmonger into the fire.

paranoia @ 93:

General_Rennenkampf @ 91:

liberalNmoderation @ 90:

pissed off patricia @ 78:

Actually...I think the entire planet would be better off if the bible had never been written.

I'm not so sure...something else would have come along in its place, and no guarantees that it would have been as relatively easy to defang as Christianity.

Monotheism, let alone evangelical monotheism like Christianity or Islam, was a genie that was going to pop out of the bottle sometime, after all, we have it in a nonChristian context in both India and a pre-Columbian indigenous religion in the American continent.

I never understood sacrificing virgin into the volcano. Sounds like something a jilted man would think of. I am all for sacrificing bad leaders into the volcano. Whatever religion that foster that, I will believe in a heart beat! Some reggae music and drum beats, and food aplenty while tossing the warmonger into the fire.

Meh, I'd rather the devil we know than the devil we don't.

This current-day United States represents one path our particular nation took. The Confederacy represents a darker, alternative that is still rooted in the society and culture of the US. Like I said, as someone who otherwise might have been living in a banana republic ruled by plantation-owning sonsobitches, I prefer the current US.

And I certainly don't like speculating on what my ancestors might have turned the CSA into. Nothing good comes out of what I think, but a shitload of bad does.

I wish Nancy Pelosi had said that Joe Lieberman's chairmanship will be revoked should the Democrats no longer need him to form a majority, but that's not what she said. This post is misleading. She simply commented that it'll be "very interesting" to observe what would happen in that hypothetical scenario. Not exactly the most committal of possible responses to the caller's question.

Yeah, right Nancy, LIEBERMAN is the real problem.

As much of a douchebag as he is, and he is a screaming, SCREAMING douchebag (so glad to hear that everyone is on the same page here...in 2000 it was heresy, HERESY, to suggest that anyone WOULDN'T want Joe Lieberman to hold the second highest office in the land), at the very least he hasn't:

* Faked documents to lead us to war
* Illegally (but apparently not criminally?) politicized the justice department
* Illegally (but soon retroactively not for long) wiretapped AMERICAN CITIZENS without a warrant
* Kidnapped, held without charge and tortured untold, what, dozens? hundreds? thousands of people? Will we EVER know?

Oh, no, right, the investigation of these things is "off the table." I forgot. Much more important for you to bitchslap the man who, let me remind us all, all right-thinking progressives believe should be the vice president, right now.

So, is there a difference between Democrats and Republicans? I don't know. Is there a difference between an abusive alcoholic and the codependent spouse who keeps making excuses and blaming the children for bringing the abuse on themselves?

Target the real criminals here, Nancy. Lieberman is acting in accordance with the campaign he ran on: indpedent Democrat who favors current Republican policies. He said that's who he is and the oh, so clever people of his state voted him right in. Didn't believe him, I guess.

You, on the other hand, promised all kinds of change and reform and an end to the war and blah blah blah and so far we've seen two things: jack and shit...and jack just walked off stage.

OH who the hell cares what you think anymore Nancy? You suck more than Sucky McSuckington, winner of the Suckton, SC Suck County Suck-Off.

If you'd DO YOUR DAMN JOB already, we wouldn't be worrying about Lapdog Lieberman, we'd be celebrating the first Female President... YOU! (you know... the part where you'd be next in line after Bush and Cheney are impeached out of DC and into a Federal Prison? You know... the whole oath to defend the Constitution thingy you did when you took office?)

Oh well, but that's off the table... which led me to my aforementioned proclamation of your well-known general suckitude.

Oh, and if you come back with "elect more Democrats!" I swear to God I'll vote Green for the rest of my life.

Oh please! Pelosi's been a total failure. When Obama loses in November her and the rest of the incompetent Democratic leadership should be shown the door. It's time to rebuild the party with people who will fight for progressive ideals.

Hey Nancy.....look in the mirror.

Meat @ 95:
"I wish Nancy Pelosi had said that Joe Lieberman’s chairmanship will be revoked should the Democrats no longer need him to form a majority, but that’s not what she said. This post is misleading. She simply commented that it’ll be “very interesting” to observe what would happen in that hypothetical scenario"

Yes, that's exactly what she said. I think C&L was being deceptive in making it look like she had even HALF a spine. What the caller actually got was a parsed non-answer saying it might be interesting to see if a Democratically controlled Senate would continue to let a turncoat Republican chair one of its most important committees, or if they might think about giving the job to a Democrat instead.

It would be NICE if we got that kind of non-partisan THIRD PARTY NEUTRALITY from the MEDIA! Instead, we get partisan Republican SPIN from the media, and non-partisan NEUTRALITY from the Democratic Speaker of the House. Nice...

when i hear off the tadle pelosi speak, it sounds just like the adult trombone talking sound i used to hear on the charlie brown television specials.
"wamp wamp wamp wamp, wamp wamp wamp" .
nancy and harry must go!

Can't watch the video. Did she threaten to write him a stern letter?

Why in the world are the people of CT not recalling this asshole. We have to suffer because of their idiotic choice. How many people have the sign the Joe Liebermann Must Go petition before they begin to act responsibly with regard to the rest of the country.

What is she going to do, blink Joe to death?

You're truly a cocktail weenie Nancy, time for you to go out with the rest of the trash.

Don't believe it- she's selling books.

bob @ 59:

Mayday @9"
"It took exactly 1 hour and 10 minutes for that video to disappear - so who monitors information at you tube?"

Something's going on with the embeds. If you go to YouTube, you can watch it-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aF8BdG5yNWA

This is but one of many reasons why embedded You Tube (and any other)
video players just plain suck. Post a LINK to the site hosting it, and a jpeg
or whatever kind of screen shot, and everyone will be much happier.

shaggles @ 4:

Pelosi is Speaker of the House. Does she actually have any say about Senate commitees? Well kudos anyway for sort of standing up to Lieberman.

Oh, please. Pelosi neve stood up to anyone. Civics 101: Lieberman is in the Senate.

I could care less what Nancy Pelosi says about Joe Lieberman.

I want to know what Harry Reid has to say, and why Joe Lieberman has ANY power with the Democrats.

PUT THE SMACK ON LIARMAN.... about freeking time!!!!

why he has power.... because he is the 51st vote.... SADLY THEY NEED HIM AT TIMES....

get everyone registered to vote TIME TO CLEAN HOUSE

pissed off patricia @ 78:

If there were as many copies of the Constitution floating around out there and being read, as there are bibles, this country would be a hell of a lot better off.

Bless you my friend.

Hey, Nancy! The correct answer is,

"If I were doing a better job in the House, I might stick my nose into Senate affairs. Right now, I'm too busy keeping impeachment off the table to concern myself with something that is none of my business."

Let's be clear: until she reads the articles of impeachment, C&L should join the 91 percent of America in ignoring her

Nancy, when you do something other than send nasty letters, and wait and see, we'll listen. Until then...

How are your dividend cheques from the MIC these days? BIG? HUGE?

What have the Dems done to "cool down/shut down" the neocons since they were elected in '06? I can't think of anything either. If you can, please post it, I'm eager to see.

The Dems are enablers.

Edwin Hussein, arugula lover @ 116:

What have the Dems done to "cool down/shut down" the neocons since they were elected in '06? I can't think of anything either. If you can, please post it, I'm eager to see.

The Dems are enablers.

Well they, er....ahem brb

Nancy Pelosi says: Discussion of Joe Lieberman is off the table.

I only hope from the bottom of my heart that Lieberman takes Pelosi, Emanuel, Hoyer, Reid, Schumer and Feinstein with him.

McCain will choose Lieberman as his running mate, who in turn will become our next president. It is what Israel wants and we are so completely owned by Israel.

Pelosi won't do a damned thing. She is Bush's biggest protector in Congress, and so a natural ally of Lieberman.

This is just for show, trying to fend off Cindy Sheehan's candidacy.

I don't know why this would worry Lieberman. When's the last time Nancy Pelosi followed through on anything?

More talk, no action. Why didn't she do that a year or 2 ago? It's not like he has been working with the dems all along.
What a disappointment pelosi is, as a woman and as a dem. wonder what the reps have on her to keep her so adamantly against protecting the us constitution?

[Deleted-Sitemonitor]

Otay @ 119:

I only hope from the bottom of my heart that Lieberman takes Pelosi, Emanuel, Hoyer, Reid, Schumer and Feinstein with him.

I couldn`t agree more. These people are not Democrats. They are enablers for the Chimp and Company. They cut our throats and now they want to be voted in again.

Is that Judge Judy?

When are you people going to get it through your demented heads? Fight Republicans, not Democrats. I know the San Francisco Bay Area, and believe me Pelosi and Feinstein are not, not, not going to be voted out. We need to get Obama and other Democrats voted in---put your energy and passion in that direction. You can follow your "ideals" and lose or accept being in a bigger tent and (maybe) win. Just stop and consider this. Would you rather be "right" than win??

jward @ 127:

When are you people going to get it through your demented heads? Fight Republicans, not Democrats. I know the San Francisco Bay Area, and believe me Pelosi and Feinstein are not, not, not going to be voted out. We need to get Obama and other Democrats voted in---put your energy and passion in that direction. You can follow your "ideals" and lose or accept being in a bigger tent and (maybe) win. Just stop and consider this. Would you rather be "right" than win??

We are fighting Republicans. Or I should say Republican enabling losers. People who effectively vote against the interests of their own base. Standing up for my ideals is nothing more than standing against a Repub ideology which is rejected by 70% of the U.S. population; this is a winning strategy in the long run. So I will stand up for my ideals against craven DINOs and/or spineless Milquetoasts any day, rather than join them . They will lose in the judgment of history.

If they listened to their base, which is now supported by that 70%, they would actually win, instead of losing. So pardon me if I refuse to join the band of losers.

In short, these loser Dem congresscritters are not in the "big tent"; they have left the bigger tent in favor of sleeping with the dogs.

Even though she's not in the Senate, I loved hearing it from someone in the leadership.

Let's not worry about the judgment of history right now, let's worry about the election in 10 weeks. Obama's election is very iffy--he's only a few points ahead if that. Plus it would be nice if we could elect 6 or 8 Democratic senators so we could finally make some progress in Congress and get more laws passed that would benefit the people. Those you are calling a band of losers were winners in 2006, but by the very slimmest of margins. In short do you realize that we are very close to getting Pres. McCain? (we've only had 2 Democratic presidents in the last 40 years) and if we do get Pres. McCain do you want a strong opposition in Congress that can fight him?

Actually, I'm beginning to think we're all being a little too hard on Nancy. True, she's been a pusillanimous insect when it comes to upholding the Constitution, or impeaching BushCo. But you got to give her credit for frustrating the Republicans on the offshore oil drilling debate, shutting off C-SPAN and turning the lights out in the house, leaving the turgid little buggers to scramble around in the dark like cockroaches with silk neckties.

Now THAT was some FUNNY SH!T!

Wow. A not-to-his-face tsk-tsking statement of the obvious - once the Dems have a more solid majority Lieberman's usefulness is over and done with. That Peolsi is hard core.

jward @ 130:

Let's not worry about the judgment of history right now, let's worry about the election in 10 weeks. Obama's election is very iffy--he's only a few points ahead if that. Plus it would be nice if we could elect 6 or 8 Democratic senators so we could finally make some progress in Congress and get more laws passed that would benefit the people. Those you are calling a band of losers were winners in 2006, but by the very slimmest of margins. In short do you realize that we are very close to getting Pres. McCain? (we've only had 2 Democratic presidents in the last 40 years) and if we do get Pres. McCain do you want a strong opposition in Congress that can fight him?

Yes, let's worry about the election. And in that vein, encourage the Dem congresscritters to vote with the majority of the country, rather than vote with the dead-enders. Repubs already are using the example of the Dem congress to point out that it was a "bipartisan" screw-up that this administration got us into. IOW, Dems in general are being dragged into the mud that Bush created.

We would be far beyond McCain in public opinion if it weren't for the DC establishment (and yes, Obama) trying to associate themselves with the Repubs in policy, by voting with their most egregious of bills.

And don't associate my attack of the some of the Dems with all of the Dems in congress. Russ Feingold has made some mistakes (and some serious ones), but he has done much good. So have several other Dems. However, the craven ones in congress are dragging the names of the good ones down with them.

Yes I want a strong opposition in congress to fight Repubs. That is why the poor Dems must be marginalized at the very least. Thanks to them and the incompetent Dem strategists, the race is this close, and not ahead by 30 points. When one considers that around 80-85% of citizens think the country is going in the wrong direction, a 30 point lead should be a given.

General_Rennenkampf @ 54:

Alice X - (Chomsky Nader) - status quObama - change you can pretend in - @ 42:

We need a Jeffersonian revolution to be rid of the entire lot of them, with the exception of Kucinich and a very few others.

Nancy Fat Cat Pelosi must go.

So...you like the spoils system? Jefferson had better PR than Jackson, but in terms of political corruption, the two were identical.

As in the declaration of independence, 1776.

Yawn. Not too late to impeach. I'm voting for Sheehan either way.

Pelosi is an absolute bust as speaker. She's impeded any talk of impeachment and not even tried to correct the obstuctions from the Republicans. I've lost all respect for her and Feinstein is simply Liberman in a pantsuit. Neither are worth a damn. Sure we need to elect more DEMS and Obama needs all our help, but lets not lose focus here... several ineffective DEMS need replacing too.

I agree with the comments here, she has NO credibility and I hope she's voted out in november with the rest of the scumbags.

Her legacy will be having had the chance to impeach the most corrupt, incompetent, unconstitutional president in US history and taking a pass.

Funny thing is, Ronn Owens is a huge Joe Lieberman fan. I say Joe and Nancy need to go... www.cindyforcongress.org

Nancy is a stealth Republican. The party is infested with DINO's.

Nancy is the Combs to the republicans Hannity, just another piece of the same deception. Why anybody would even consider voting for a republican or democrat is beyond me.

She said:
"She said that if the Democrats win enough seats in the Senate then bye-bye Joe from any leadership position he might have held."

First of all isn't she in the House? Secondly, she needed to say this ages ago or now keep quiet. This is not the time to start saying this because even this close to your election Lieberman could easily switch sides right this moment if he has zero chance of keeping his chairmanships (not that he deserves them) and there goes the Senate for the last 80 or so days until your election.

126 odanny Says: Is that Judge Judy?

Nein,

It's Judge Harm.

It's queen nancy that needs a good smack.

May Cindy Sheehan mop the floor with Pelosi's ass.

Nancy is worthless. Best as I can tell, the Dems are working very hard to make sure another Republican gets voted in as President. Obama should be handing McCain his ass and yet some polls show them tied. Write in Kucinich. If enough of us did that, it would be pure comedy gold when the total votes cast far exceeds the number of people that will vote....

Paul @ 144:

May Cindy Sheehan mop the floor with Pelosi's ass.

Literally speaking, that is a disgusting word picture.

joe the JEW Lieberman is a dick sucking jew.....nuff said!

RudyTahuti@27 you said,
"Nancy is getting her head handed to her by her constituents back home.”

"I’m not sure the reacion is that strong, but Cindy Sheehan made the ballot, and I’ve seen several bumper stickers with her name. Expect a few thousand protest votes aimed at getting Nancy’s attention. Mine will be one of them. Nothing else works."

WHY? WHY is the reaction meriting only a few thousand protest votes???
WTF?
What is wrong with San Francisco CA? Pelosi is a ball-sucking accomplice in WAR CRIME! She is ignoring her oath of office!!!!

Get serious CA and incinerate this witch! I can't BELIEVE you guys will re-elect her? What is wrong with you people?

dk@147,
You ACTUALLy said,
"joe the JEW Lieberman is a dick sucking jew…..nuff said"

Although I claim no religious affiliation, how the FUCK did you make it past the sitemonitor?
Joe may be a worthless bag of slime on the public dole, but prithee tell, what does this have to do with him being jewish?
Go to the back of the line and get some manners while you're waiting.

149 comments

Login or Register to post comments.