#OccupyDC McPherson Cleared by Police
National Park Police invaded Occupy DC, McPherson Square in the early hours of Saturday morning with riot police, a dozen horses and a strategic plan to eliminate the encampment.
Then throughout the day, they went section by section with a fully dressed hazardous materials team, cordoning each part of the camp off with heavy wrought iron fencing and inspecting and bagging up protesters' property. Any tent with a semblance of camping materials inside was confiscated along with all belongings inside.
By the late afternoon only a few tents were left standing in the cleared sections. The small number of protesters, which never grew over 200 people, attempted to shout down and fight back police, but they were easily overwhelmed by the large police presence. Most of the time the police matched protesters in numbers.
The clearing of the camp signals a possible end for the rowdy, 128-day-old McPherson camp, which had gained notoriety after a testy protest at an Americans for Prosperity event at the DC Convention Center. The police action proved that even federal police will enforce camping bans at Occupy protests, even if there is doubt about whether it's constitutional under the First Amendment.
The police did not close down the park, or ask protesters to leave. In that way they respected the occupiers' right to a 24-hour vigil while simultaneously enforcing a camping ban, which they notified the camp they would do last Friday.
"They've met us intellectually," said Kelly Mears, a programmer who has helped out the Occupy DC tech team, "They're allowing the 24-hour vigil while enforcing camping regulations. I'm glad they didn't just come in here and beat people."
"You can't fault the cops for doing this, they can't just let them live here forever," said a bystander wearing a peacoat who had come to watch the clearing.
The only times the clearing became violent was when protesters attempted to block police from fencing off sidewalks to clear sections of the camp. Police slowly moved down the sidewalk with their riot shields forcing screaming protesters off to the side while they set up barricades. I saw one man get knocked down by a riot shield and multiple protesters struck with batons as they tried to force police back.
Other than that, it seemed as if police had learned from the clashes at other occupations around the country. They conducted their police operation in full daylight, on a Saturday. They warned protesters they were going to enforce the ban and they had a strategic plan to keep violence and arrests to a minimum. Less than 20 arrests were made by 6 p.m. on Saturday, no ambulances were called.
In many ways, the McPherson clearing symbolized the Occupy movement itself. As occupiers put a focus on camps they lost the message of income inequality and the influence of money in politics that had galvanized support. On Saturday, truckloads of trash were pulled out of a run-down McPherson Square protected by few protesters. Weary, disheveled occupiers looked on, too exhausted to think of a symbolic action to turn the media cameras away from the mess they had created.
"You create a squat and you attract squatters," said a disillusioned protester named Rob, who had helped to start Occupy DC McPherson.
He sees the clearing as a new start. A way to refocus the movement back towards the goals that it had started with. He wants to organize protesters around foreclosure defense and debt resistance in order to enter a phase two.
The problems that came along with a long-standing occupation were present all around McPherson on Saturday. Tents filled with soiled blankets and ad-hoc comfort materials like fiberglass insulation. Trash enveloping the small pockets between crates used to keep tents off the ground. Anarchists swearing and yelling loudly at police. Knee-jerk reactions to enforcement, rather than long-term planning and symbolic optics.
And it's those optics that average Americans, the 99 percent, will see in the papers. They'll see the hazmat suits, the confrontations, the disheveled protesters and the truckloads of trash.
Yes, occupying the park was a symbol in and of itself. Anytime a DC resident or worker drove past the park they may have thought about the reasons it was founded: The gross inequality in this country and the greedy bankaneers that have rigged the economic game to benefit themselves. But, if they looked closely they would have seen cigarette-smoking, mostly male, bandanna wearing protesters covered in anarchy symbols mingling with the homeless.
The protesters will still be able to occupy McPherson Square. They'll be able to hold a 24-hour vigil. But they won't be able to sleep there. Three blocks away the calm and older crowd at Freedom Plaza is still standing strong. They complied with the ban on camping materials and cleaned out their tents when they were instructed to by the police. As a result, they were not bothered on Saturday.
With McPherson's eviction, pressing questions rest on the Occupy movement. Can it succeed promoting a legitimate message targeting real problems in America without getting involved in the messy problems of sustaining an occupation in a park? Or is it time for a rebranding of a movement that will likely take years to come to an equitable solution?



Your failure to characterize simple law enforcement as the actions of a police state is bound to outrage the masses. But you're sure going to draw the hits. I'm liking Rob the protester. He seems to have had an epiphany that may lead him to more productive outlets for his outrage.
Hasa Diga Eebowai
I know, I tweeted earlier that if only the police would enforce banking regulations like they enforce camping regulations then protesters wouldn't have to be in the park in the first place. But the goal of this movement isn't to occupy parks, it's to promote systemic change in the government. If one tactic fails, it's time to find another one.
Thank you for the concern.
The only way I can think of to achieve these goals in a democracy is to use the institutions that democracy provides. Sounds to me like you have read Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, those on the right certainly have. Not that I agree entirely with the man, application of his rule thirteen is largely responsible for the toxification of political discourse in the United States but he certainly did have a genius for political organization. Hadn't read that work myself since the early eighties when it was imposed on me in a non-technical elective poly-sci course. I wish I had paid more attention. The last four decades of US history viewed through that lens reveals endless lost opportunities.
Hasa Diga Eebowai
That means they are under the direction of the Federal govt.
Not very hopey changey of you President Obama and Democrats in Congress.
last night and this morning were PERFECT news dump days for this stuff. Super Bowl weekend. FEW are paying attention. Other Occupy sites got hit too, as I understand it.
Were there ANY American media outlets there to cover Occupy DC this morning? I heard there weren't.
They HAD to know what was going on by then. I'm beginning to think the American media deploys journalists based on twitter traffic volume.
A few foreign journalists were there and they were NOT impressed by our American media.
Wall Street is just a parasite on the actual labor and investments of average Americans.
Banks play with futures, debt paper, complex financial instruments, and other peoples incomes.
Sell 'em short & help 'em crash - Tear 'em apart & sell the pieces
I saw Reuters, RT, AP, Washington Post, Yahoo News, DCist, Washington Examiner, ABC and NBC all covering today's events in DC. There may have been more. But I imagine they'll just do short blurbs or small stories about confrontations and the camping ban enforcement.
they were there and brought cameras?
Did K Street get bad? I was watching the feed and could hear it.
"If the US government enforced its banking laws like it did its park regulations, we wouldn't be
in this damn park in the first place." - that is GOOD... succinct
Wall Street is just a parasite on the actual labor and investments of average Americans.
Banks play with futures, debt paper, complex financial instruments, and other peoples incomes.
Sell 'em short & help 'em crash - Tear 'em apart & sell the pieces
Kudos to the Freedom Plaza Occupiers!
The next strategy for the OWS movement is to win the hearts and minds of the American people - so that the American people can proudly say that the occupiers represent them - that the occupiers are the 99% and the 99% are the occupiers.
"Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob"
-= Franklin Delano Roosevelt =-
are made in the halls of Congress. Health Care (or lack of); Life and Death (War); Finance (TARP); and our very Civil Liberties (NSA spying, The Patriot Act); Who controls our air ways (FCC) are decided by these 500 plus men and women. If any place should be "Occupied", the halls of Congress should be it! Notice that the armies of corporate "Lobbyists" are not hanging out in public parks? They know where the action is and where the decisions are made.
Occupy K street and Congress!
These are the hardcore protesters keeping the movement going. When the weather finally breaks the crowds will grow. If people are still unemployed with nothing to look forward to, unions (both public and private) having to take wage cuts, new graduates entering a poor job market, as well as government cutting benefits, I look for the protests to be huge next year.
But you mean this year, 2012. All the media, arrogantly trying to marginalize, will keep being surprised as the Movements keep changing the country for the better, and succeed in ending this god forsaken gilded age.
The main objective should be how to stop the Rethugs from rethugging.
they went section by section with a fully dressed hazardous materials team, cordoning each part of the camp off with heavy wrought iron fencing and inspecting and bagging up protesters' property.
They seem to really dig this tack. Bio-hazard = terrorists and we know how that will end.
I doubt they would ever stoop so low as to plant something, perhaps something hazardous-looking and white, inside a tent... right? I mean, right?
far left loon >.<
anyone that says "a fully dressed hazmat team" for the most part. At least not in regards to what a hazmat is about. That is unless they are talking about a group that looks like they are about ready to do surface exploration on Mars or they are talking about a team that just got dressed after one heck of a party.
I've got "some" experience in hazmat, define fully dressed. Are we talking street clothes? Rain suit? Tyvek suit? Nomex suit? Gumby suit(sorry don't know the exact name anymore, it's a acid resistant clothing that is green in color and is pretty much a rubber like suit that covers everything but the face)? A heat/flame resistant metallic suit? Full "space suit"(probably what most people think of when they hear fully dressed hazmat team"? Safety glasses? Face shield? Dust, half/full face mask? With or without supplied air? How about shoes?
I'm guessing they were probably wearing a tyvek suit and gloves and maybe safety glasses and/or a dust mask at the very most. I've worn that for simple jobs around the house when I didn't want to get dirty. People if they saw me would of thought I was doing something really nasty and hazardous, rather than just getting in the crawl space to run a computer wire.
If I had to clean out a bunch of tents used for a month or longer by people I didn't know and quite possibly didn't have for the most part modern sanitation, I would want to wear pretty much the same.
And it would be much easier to plant something wearing street clothes. Well unless you wanted to plant something bulky, tyvek isn't that form fitting usually. But I've never seen a tyvek suit with pockets or really easy access to them, picture plastic like coveralls with no pockets and sometimes attached footies and hood.
Right, because the occupiers are quite possibly animals who can't help but piss and shit where they sleep.
Congratulations.
not animals. People that quite possibly do not have access to modern sanitation. Same as myself when my family and I go camping at a primitive site. We don't urinate or defecate in the tent, but I could imagine what it would be like in a month. Let alone longer.
Many of the protesters at McPherson did comply with the Park Service orders. Many of those were left grumbling about their tents being taken down anyway. I think the problems with McPherson were twofold- there were many empty tents, people who had stopped sleeping there because of the cold, and weren't around to take responsibility; and many homeless people.
The McPherson Occupation had embraced more homeless people than Freedom Plaza, which is not a bad thing. The decision to fight the Park Service's efforts and erect the Tent of Dreams was in part an effort to stand up for the homeless there. Those down there just to protest were largely OK with leaving at night; they just wanted the homeless to still be allowed to sleep in tents.
One of the most ridiculous aspects of the justifications used for clearing out various Occupations is that they are all problems that are going on with the homeless populations of those cities on a daily basis, on a much larger scale, with little action taken by goverment to deal with it. If you go across the corner from McPherson square you'll find a Metro entrance with about half dozen homeless who 'camp' there, just without tents to shelter them. A block away and you'll find another Metro entrance and another half dozen homeless. Across the corner from there you'll find Franklin Park and about a dozen homeless who stay there. In a 4 block radius you can probably find more homeless on the streets than people sleeping in McPherson.
The Occupation did take actions to take advantage of all the press coverage they got the first day the Park Police said they were going to enforce the camping ban. They erected the 'Tent of Dreams' and organized a sleep strike, which kept some media coming back to talk to the strikers. Unfortunately, they were hastily made, reactive decisions that could have had better planning and a more focused message. I think they were largely relying on the court order for 24 hours notice before eviction. They planned a park cleaning for this week. That would have been smart. The images of bedding being removed didn't hurt them, but the trash certainly does.
Certainly more could have been done to take advantage of Saturday. Sadly, one idiot with a brick probably guaranteed that he would be the story in most news outlets no matter what they did.
The notions that the eviction was good for them, just another action, or a fresh start were common afterwards. I would guess that emotional attachment to the camp gave some an unreasonable optimism and prevented a lot of them from recognizing the inevitable and planning to exploit it. Hopefully it is all a valuable lesson.
Looks like I got suckered by the corporate media. According to the police report the protester they arrested through a bottle, not a brick, as was reported in the WaPo and many other outlets. It did still injure an officer and was a really stupid thing to do.
Just another "respectable" media failure.
"You’re the reason that I ran for office in the first place." -- NObama
Comments are restricted to registered users only.
Login - Register