Last year, Arizona enacted one of those anti-immigration laws that actually tried to address the employer side of the equation, ostensibly cracking down on the businesses that hire illegal immigrants.

But it seems there's a been a hitch -- namely, so far not a single employer has been charged:

When the state's employer-sanctions law took effect nearly a year ago, it threatened to shut down businesses that hired illegal workers.

But not a single employer has been taken to court in Arizona, mainly because the landmark law is too difficult to enforce, authorities say.

In Maricopa County, where the law led to raids on a dozen businesses and the arrest of 159 workers and a manager, investigators have not been able to assemble enough evidence showing that employers actually knew the arrested workers were illegal, which the sanctions law requires.

Of course, the solution preferred by Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas is to go back to the Legislature and get even more enforcement powers so he can investigate these companies more thoroughly.

But then, we're talking about a prosecutor so prone to abusing his discretionary powers that he recently charged one of the county supervisors with 118 felony criminal counts related to his poorly filed county paperwork -- a bizarre case that has alienated the rest of the Board of Supervisors and has left the local newspapers' editorial pages shaking their collective heads. The Arizona Republic characterizes it as "raw political payback" that is simply "beyond the pale," not to mention "malicious and predatory."

Meanwhile, Thomas' bosom buddy, the county's power-mad nativist sheriff, Joe Arpaio, has been castigated by the state's civil-rights advisory board for his gross, ongoing abuses in rounding up every Latino in sight:

A state civil-rights panel is recommending that, because of racial-profiling complaints, the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors end a contract with the federal government that allows the county Sheriff's Office to enforce immigrations laws.

The Arizona Civil Rights Advisory Board also is asking federal officials in Washington, D.C., to investigate the Sheriff's Office for possible civil-rights violations during the enforcement of immigration laws. Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon made a similar request earlier this year.

Indeed, a federal investigation of Arpaio -- who has ignored court orders, created insane conditions in his jails, arrested citizens for merely applauding at public meetings, and flagrantly attacked Latinos' civil rights -- is long overdue.

But so is the need for Arizonans -- along with everyone else -- to recognize that the "we just need to enforce the laws we have on the books" approach is misbegotten from the start, because the laws we have on the books are not just grotesquely ineffective, they are themselves misbegotten in their very conception. It's time for real immigration reform that doesn't hand over police-state powers to prosecutors in the overzealous pursuit of people we should be making citizens of instead of jailing and deporting.



Login or Register to post comments.

17 comments

these are the retirees and geriatric snow-birds/meskin-haters who winter and pay the wages in the sun-belt...

)O(

What the hell is the difference between a Hispanic, a Chicano and a Latino? It's like no matter what term you use it's a sign you're a bigot.

And one moment some seem to be advancing their European roots, and the next their Native American.

The best defintion I've heard for "Hipanic" and "Latino" are that they are linguistic/cultural groups...in the U.S. Hispanic could mean a person of Mexican descent in California, someone of Spanish descent in New Mexico, Puerto Rican in New York, Cuban in Florida, etc.; meanwhile Latino can include Portguese speakers. Chicano is a term for Americans of Mexican descent, who often share a certain political mentality. Maybe more than you wanted to know, but since no one's answered your question, as someone who fits in all three catagories and has taken Chicano Studies, I thought I would try. ;)

As for emphasizing certain parts of their ancestry, well some of us are more European than Indigenous or vice versa, and others can relate equally to both sides of their ancestry. :)

)O(

I heard that Arpaio is getting his own reality TV show.

my county just re-elected these guys. Such an embarrassment.

)O(

Lets see, What of ignorance of the law does not immune you from its justice?

If you disagree, try this experiment,

Officer, I didn't realize the speed limit was under 95 MPH in this area !

If an employer cannnot prove their employees citizenship/legal workability. It is obvious that they hired without verification and therefore circumvented the law of full knowledge.

It is simply a matter of looking at the employees application and information the employer(s) required/accepted/and kept on file.

)O(

The problem here is anti-discrimination laws. All they can do is ask for a driver's license for identification, and if it looks reasonably like one, they can't pursue it any further. To do so opens them up to civil suits and possibly prosecution.

However, I'm not sure how day labor places continue to operate as they have been.

is not proof of citizenship. The guidlines are clear, and employers are free to demand any of the acceptable IDs as proof. It's called discretion.

Which brings me back to robt's point, which was well made.

Proving that the law hasn't resulted in prosecutions doesn't prove that it hasn't had an effect. There is plenty of evidence that employers are being much more careful about who they employ now that this law is on the books.
Also, it would not be that hard to prosecute an employer who hires illegals, as there are now resources which make it very easy to verify an potential employee's identity and documentation. Any employer who chooses not to use these resources would be negligent and clearly not exercising due diligence.

Oh, and why should we convert illegals (criminals) to citizens? So the 'Pubs and their corporate lackeys have a steady supply of cheap labor with which to deflate wages?
Citizenship for illegals should be pretty low on the list of priorities for politicians who represent WORKING Americans in this GOP-created recession/depression/economic collapse. We have plenty of struggling CITIZENS to worry about right about now.

Hey, let us not forget that these folk are undocumented/illegals
that means
A) the employers cheat the workers
B) these workers ARE keeping wages down and denying American Citizens jobs
C) these folk need to go back to Mexico and force their corrupt yet rich government to FIX THEIR own country
D) We ARE a country of immigrants that is not the point Illegals allow the capitalist system (especially one under republican rule) to lie cheat and steal from workers.....

...are dancing on the ends of Wall Street's strings. Solve THAT problem, and illegal immigration, like so many other issues, will largely go away.

"should be making citizens'? We wouldn't accept 8 million Mother Theresas if they were illegal. And it's a racist notion that all Latinos are alike and therefore accept illegals from Mexico.

Arpaio imprisoned on felony charges. I live for the day.

How long would that Nazi survive? I'm taking all bets.

I do not fault the illegal immigrants from coming to the U.S. one bit. If you want to blame anyone it is the businesses that hire them. With no jobs they would not come. U.S. businesses are the ones inviting the illegal immigrants into the country. They are telling them to come. If the Republicans want to clamp down on anyone they should clamp down on U.S. business. Not a chance they will do that. Love to see the Republicans get into a real genuine fight with big agriculture and the entire construction industry. Good luck with that Republicans.

The problem goes much deeper than that. If American corporations weren't ruining the economies of countries like Mexico, Guatemala & Nicaragua, those workers wouldn't be coming here in the first place. I'm surprised at how frequently that portion of the story gets overlooked. Ever heard of United Fruit?

Would you believe that these two "law and order" candidates have not prosecuted one company for hiring illegals? ? They talk a lot and do very little except jump in front of the camera every chance they get. Andrew Thomas had to shave off his moustache since he looked exactly like his hero, Adolf Hitler.

These two are nothing but reich wing fascists. Maricopa County has 45 THOUSAND felony warrants out and how many do they bring in - ZERO. They are too busy making their names in politics and arrest people for "driving while brown". Otherwise these guys are all show and NO go. Typical republKKKon party politics at work as usual. People voting for these two don't have a clue on what is going on. They just listen to KTAR radio (flagship of the KKK in Arizona and the TAR and feather groups of Arizona) and hide in their geratric gated communities and count their money in the back room.

17 comments

Login or Register to post comments.