TOPICS

For right-wing whiners, rights are for me, not for thee

Ever notice how the wingnuts start a-flapping whenever someone remotely suggests that some far-right nutcase or other ought not to be speaking on the public dime (see particularly Ann Coulter), or when a right-wing hack winds up getting his show cancelled because he hacked up a ratings hairball? Censorship! they cry.

But when it comes to left-wing figures, especially the targets of their fury, well, such scruples vanish like the little bubbles they always were.

So yesterday the University of Nebraska gave in to the wingnutosphere's onslaught against cause celebre William Ayers, who was scheduled to speak there next month.

Mind you, they did so not because they agreed with the claim that Ayers shouldn't speak, but because the frothing has reached the point that officials feared for the safety of Ayers as well as the attending public:

The University of Nebraska-Lincoln rescinded its speaking invitation tonight for 1960s radical-turned-educator William Ayers.

University officials cited "safety reasons" for canceling Ayers' Nov. 15 appearance.

Spokeswoman Kelly Bartling declined to elaborate on what safety concerns would keep Ayers from addressing a College of Education and Human Sciences event.

Earlier today, Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman strongly condemned the invitation and called on the NU Board of Regents and President J.B. Milliken to block it.

The earlier version of the story reports:

University officials said in a news release Friday evening that “the university’s threat assessment group monitored e-mails and other information UNL received regarding Ayers’ scheduled Nov. 15 visit and identified safety concerns which resulted in the university canceling the event.”

Of course, leading the torchlight brigade to block Ayers' appearance was our old friend Michelle Malkin, who earlier this week descended even farther into self-parody by complaining that poor Joe the Self-Promoter's Plumber's ordinary rights as a citizen were being trampled upon by the "deranged" liberal bloggers and reporters who decided to look into his background.

So what does she have to say about the reasons for the Ayers cancellation?

“Safety concerns.”

Whose safety?

Gee, I wonder.

Waiting for someone to scream “RAAAAACIST” or something.

How about "fascist"? That oughta work. Not to mention fit.



Login or Register to post comments.

77 comments

The "logic" of wingnuts is a joke.

Ok, truth, he sat on a board with the guy, ok fine.

I myself would never sit on a board with a known terrorist, I think this is where judgment comes into play.

Truth, Obama was 8 when those attacks were committed, ok fine, I agree, but why do you go to the guys house to launch your senate campaign in Illinois? If you knew he had done those thing at that time, why associate with him? If he did not know, ok fine, I can buy that too, but when did he know?

These are the more important questions that need answering, I am not smearing anyone here, but I would like these questions answered.

Btw, Truth, Sara Palin's husband was in that group, not herself, and there are no documents to prove otherwise

Thank you,

Obama launched his political career in Chicago, Illinois at a Ramada Inn in Hyde Park (a south side neighborhood), when he challenged a petition from a Democratic state Senator.

Sarah Palin was Governor of Alaska when she taped a message to the Alaskan separatists. She showed terrible judgement as a state Governor by taping that message, and it leaves one to wonder with whom her loyalties lay.

You are buying into the lies and the smears.

Obama launced his career in Ayers living room? You talk about no documents to prove Palin was in the AIP (while she gave a speech at their convention)...where is your proof that Obama did anything in Ayers' living room?

Ok, so I have no proof, I am man enough to admit that. I must note though, he did knife(loose term) his mentor in the back and got everyone thrown off of the ballot, what makes you think he won't do the same to us?

So then there is no doubt about a question as such is viable then, Truth, he sat on a board with him,(hence the association) this is factual and he does not deny it. Why didn't he leave? Why did he stay there? Throw everything else out of the window,

Is it a valid question to ask, why did you sit on a board with a known terrorist?

You seem to forget that Board had many others on it as well. You should be asking why the board did not just dissolve? The answer is pretty clear. Everybody involved was there for a bigger reason than political self aggrandizement. They were there to enhance public education.

You are wrong about State Representative Alice Palmer. She went back on a deal to give up her seat to Obama and he called her on it. She lost and he won. If anybody stabbed anybody in the back, it was Alice Palmer who tried to stab Obama and she badly missed.

That was 40 years ago. He wrote about it what he did. He never hid it. He has been a college professor for how long? And the board Obama served on was one for education. By that time, he was an upstanding citizen as stated by many, many people have stated publicly.

I have no idea what the ballot thing you are referring to. Give me a link and let me see it. Then I can respond.

One of the perspectives missing from the discussion of William Ayers actions is the context in which it occurred, and the parallels to other times in history. 40 years ago I, along with scores of my college classmates, considered whether violent action might be warranted to address the unjustices being fostered by a government from which we felt alienated. Ultimately, most of us chose more peaceful forms of protest because we recognized the ultimate nihilistic outcomes of violence. However, the fact that so many of us were drawn to consider and discuss such actions as possilbly legitimate responses should underscore the potential for disaster in policies that alienate and disenfranchise citizens.

It is also worth noting that an iconic patriot of the stature of Thomas Jefferson called for periodic, recurrent violent revolution as a probably necessary step in the process of continuing an evolutionary path towards true democracy. I believe that Jefferson would be apalled by the state of the United States in 2008.

The fact that violent revolution and total destruction of a society is too great a price to pay (and indeed is too undertain in its outcome) in the battle for progress towards justice and equality should be of little comfort to those who would seek to hide behind "conservative values" that in turn disguise greedy, self-serving motivation. If violence, or threats of violence are used to promote these hidden agendas, it will undoubtedly unleash a firestorm of reaction. Continued attempt to steal elections through illegitimate actions that intimidate and disenfranchise voters may well fall into this category.

somebody is going to get hurt soon. McCain and Palin will have blood on their hands.

Two murdered in the Tennessee Unitarian Church shooting - do they count? Does anyone know what was the motive in the murder of Arkansas Democratic Party chief Bill Gwatney?

I had forgotten about that.

that they would wear that blood as a badge.

but I am very frightened of what might occur. Palin and McCain are stirring up the climate so much that people are going to use their anger on someone. I've already heard the story about a Obama campaign worker in the mid-West who was assaulted as she did door-to-door canvassing.

Today, I read a story about Mr. Obama hung in effigy in Ohio, I believe.

It's frightening because the crimes continue to escalate.

While I'm not surprised by the fact that this occurred at a 'Christian' university, I am a bit surprised by the low turnout at the recent campaign rally there.

Here we are: prima facie evidence that these touch screen machines need to be ditched immediately.

ALERT** PEOPLE NEED TO DEMAND PAPER BALLOTS FOR NOVEMBER 4 TO HAVE YOUR VOTE COUNTED.

THE MACHINES ARE ALREADY RIGGED AND FLIPPING OBAMA VOTES TO MC CAIN. THIS IS NOT JUST A FEW 'GLITCHES' HERE, FOLKS, IT'S RAMPANT IN THE SYSTEM. THIS IS A HACKED SYSTEM AND CANNOT BE TRUSTED TO LEGITIMATELY COUNT YOUR VOTES.

CALL YOUR CONGRESSMAN TODAY TO HAVE THIS INVESTIGATED. THESE TOUCH SCREEN MACHINES NEED TO BE TRASHED IMMEDIATELY OR YOUR VOTE WILL BE HACKED.

http://www.sundaygazettemail.com/News/2008101...

Ya think he'd do anything about this? I don't think so ...

Paper ballots are easy to use, cost-effective and tamper-proof.

I've voted absentee for the past 4 elections. I like marking my paper ballot in ink, dating and signing it.

It's a very sad state of affairs we have here.

Two weeks before probably the most important election in history and here we have all these problems.

We knew in 2000 that we had a serious problem and Congress' solution was computerized voting!

I agree with the above posts. Demand a paper ballot!

If there's still time, request to vote absentee!

Dude.

Lose the capslock.

SRSLY.

John McCain is a White Racist and that is the truth. John McCain is also a WAR CRIMINAL, and no “War Hero.” McCain killed innocent villagers like all cowards do from way above the sky in dropping those bombs on women, children, and men. McCain should have been put on trial for the war crimes against humanity he perpetrated during the Vietnam War alongside his scum-sucking pal, Henry Kissinger. Funny how his little butt-sucking boy Joe Lieberman received five college deferments to escape serving during the Vietnam war. The scumbag Joe Lieberman claimed to be an anti-war and pro-civil rights man at that time. Lieberman never said crap about the Weathermen until this election and the irony is that both he and Ayers both opposed the Vietnam war. It is time to call Lieberman on his hypocrisy regarding his opposition to the Vietnam War. Back to McCain. John McCain's views on women's issues shows him to be a typical male chauvinist pig. The right wing has built its base upon racism, sexism, and homophobia. In election after election whether overtly or under the radar, the Republicans inject racism into presidential campaigns before denying and running from it.

It is time to revive the words racist, male chauvinist pigs and their women apologists on the right, bigots on the right, sexism, and, of course, homophobes. McCain, Palin, and all their apologists fit this description (even if they try to deny it--the more they deny and protest it--the more they fit this category). Right-wingers despise “political correctness” because it disembowels their penchant for being bigots, homophobes, male chauvinist pigs, and yes, racists. That whole “reverse racism” has been a right-wing invention to undercut real talk of white America’s history and legacy of racism.

The GOP are running their usual blustering militarist and misogynist presidential campaign with uber-femme fatale, Sarah Palin attempting to outperform all the X-rated porn actresses to show how she can take orders from Big John and the rest of the right-wing crazy fundamentalists and neocon gurus, and of course the fat slob couch potatoes.

Racism is alive and working in the McCain campaign. Black Agenda Report columnist Paul Street wrote a few weeks back that: "A recent Yahoo/Associated Press/Stanford survey found that white prejudice is costing Obama six percentage points in national polls. Six points sounds low to those like me who are canvassing in the white, small-town field. Consistent with my suspicions at least, the USA TODAY poll finds that whites prefer the atrocious, decrepit, miserable misogynist and war monger John McCain over the outwardly hyper-eloquent centrist Obama by 56 to 36 percent! But even 6 points could be enough to de-rail Obama given the closely divided nature of the U.S. electorate. The last two presidential elections have essentially been statistical ties. The GOP ticket is so malicious and dim-witted and the conjuncture is so poor for the Republicans that Obama may win anyway, but his margin of victory will be far below what a Caucasian Democratic candidate could reasonably expect."

John McCain cannot help his racism. It is rooted in his family and their structural racist past. As Salon writers Suzi Parker and Jack Tapper informed America back in 2000, with the article entitled, "McCain's ancestors owned slaves," his "great-great grandfather William Alexander McCain owned a plantation, and later died during the Civil War as a soldier for the Mississippi cavalry."

John McCain is surely an idiot for not knowing about his family history regarding its owning slaves. As Parker and Tapper wrote:

"But what McCain didn't know about his family until Tuesday was that William Alexander McCain had owned 52 slaves. The senator seemed surprised after Salon reporters showed him documents gathered from Carroll County Courthouse, the Carrollton Merrill Museum, the Mississippi State Archives and the Greenwood, Miss., Public Library...I didn't know that," McCain said in measured tones wearing a stoic expression during a midday interview, as he looked at the documents before Tuesday night's debate. "I knew they had sharecroppers. I did not know that....This documentation includes slave schedules from Sept. 8, 1860, which list as the slave owner, "W.A. McCain." The schedules list the McCain family's slaves in the customary manner of the day -- including their age, gender and "color," labelling each either "black" or "mulatto." The slaves ranged in age from 6 months to 60 years....I knew we fought in the Civil War," McCain went on. "But no, I had no idea. I guess thinking about it, I guess when you really think about it logically, it shouldn't be a surprise. They had a plantation and they fought in the Civil War so I guess that it makes sense...It's very impactful," he said of learning the news. "When you think about it, they owned a plantation, why didn't I think about that before? Obviously, I'm going to have to do a little more research."

McCain comes from a family of racists and he is also a RACIST PIG. I am not surprised such a man would go to the low-level campaign he has resorted to. I wonder why the media has not talked about McCain's shady past more often? If they are going to dig into Obama's past, it is more than fair to raise the issue that McCain hails from a Racist Family of origin.

One other thing---Being a "conservative feminist" is like being a "recovered" sex addict who just happens to eat lunch every day at the nearest strip club.

Yes, I see all kinds of McCain-Palin lawn signs in homes that ususlly have zero political interest normally speaking. One family even went to the hardware store to put McCain-Palin lawn signs above their wooded picket fence. In a town where it used to be predominantly white, it has since been populated to where Caucasins are now the minority population.

So, when I see these lawn signs for McCain-Palin on people's front lawns, I can only think of two words---WHITE RACISM. I mean its not like these people ever, ever have lawn signs in other elections or are active in the local Republican party. As a matter of fact--the Republican Party is so weak in my hometown they have difficulty appointing GOPers to local boards and commissions. Republicans in my homwtown get the three alloted spots on the Town Council but never win local elections to the state assembly.

So, yes, its white racism, fear and white ignorance in this case folks no matter what anyone says otherwise.

I'm not arguing the concept that McCain's campaign is playing on fears of someone "different." They are.

But he can't help it because his ancestors owned slaves? Puh-leeze. What his ancestors did, or didn't do, 150 years ago has absolutely nothing to do with his attitudes and beliefs now. There are a lot of people out there whose ancestors were slaveholders - surely you're not saying they're all racist?

And the idea that McCain is "surely an idiot" for not knowing his family history is idiotic itself. Unless he's a genealogy buff (which doesn't seem likely), it's probably something he's never considered or researched.

No, McCain gets to be an opportunist pandering to race fears all own his own.

Isn't it supposedly to counter terrorism that the NSA is spying on everyone? If there are emails suggesting threats, the NSA has them, and the event could have taken place.

Oh, wait. "Justice" only intervenes when Republicans are the purported victims. Palin's email account hacked? Arrest. Attorneys won't pursue nonsense fraud charges? Fired. Contested election? The country wants an answer quickly (Sandra Day O'Connor actually claimed this - never mind that she used to play tennis with Barbara Bush).

Well, I'm glad we gave up our civil liberties.

according to a recent email from a nephew, who lives/works in chicago:

I have an MBA from that university, and it truly irritates me that a public university, none-the-less one that I attended, would allow such a man to saturate the minds of young men and women. Trust me, my fellow graduates and myself are working on getting this poor excuse for a human being fired from his position at the university.

Sieg heil! ?

Just in: GOP head Ca. voter registration outfit arrested for voter registration fraud.

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6534

Here's the press release:
According to CA SOS Debra Bowen's press release, Jacoby himself had committed voter registration fraud.

Bowen's press release, just out, follows in full...

DB08:100

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Kate Folmar

October 19, 2008 (916) 208-6521

Secretary of State Debra Bowen Announces

Arrest of Man Charged with Voter Registration Fraud

SACRAMENTO – The owner of a signature-gathering firm that works across California was arrested in Ontario today on suspicion of committing voter registration fraud, Secretary of State Debra Bowen announced.

Mark Anthony Jacoby, who owns the firm known as Young Political Majors (YPM), was arrested after allegedly registering himself to vote, once in 2006 and again in 2007, at an address where did not live. An investigation by the Secretary of State’s Election Fraud Investigation Unit revealed that Jacoby twice registered to vote at the address of a childhood home in Los Angeles although he no longer lived there.

The Secretary of State’s fraud unit and the Ontario Police Department arrested Jacoby near an Ontario hotel just before midnight Saturday. An arraignment date has not been scheduled yet.

“Voter registration fraud is a serious issue, which is why I vigorously investigate all allegations of elections fraud,” said Secretary Bowen, California’s chief elections officer. “Where there’s a case to be made, I will forward it to law enforcement for criminal prosecution.”

For his business, Jacoby traveled California and a number of other states collecting petition signatures and registering voters. Under state law, signature-gatherers must sign a declaration stating that they are either registered to vote in California or that they are eligible to do so. Jacoby allegedly registered to vote at his childhood address to meet this legal requirement.

Under California law, it is a felony punishable by up to three years in prison to register yourself when you are not entitled to vote and it is perjury to provide false information on a voter registration card.

On October 3, the Public Integrity Unit of the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office charged Jacoby with four felonies: two counts of voter registration fraud and two counts of perjury. A warrant was issued for his arrest and bail was set at $50,000.

“This arrest wouldn’t have been possible without the hard work of the Ontario Police Department and Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley’s office,” Secretary Bowen said. “I thank them both.”

The Secretary of State’s Election Fraud Investigation Unit helps maintain the integrity of the electoral process by investigating allegations of election and voter fraud in California. Potential Elections Code violations brought to the unit’s attention are thoroughly investigated and referred to law enforcement officials for prosecution when there is sufficient evidence of wrongdoing. The Secretary of State’s office does not disclose information about the status of ongoing criminal investigations, but the information from a case that results in a criminal complaint filed by a county or state prosecutor is a public record.

Anyone who has witnessed a violation of the California Elections Code is encouraged to contact the Secretary of State’s Election Fraud Investigation Unit at (800) 345-VOTE or http://www.sos.ca.gov/el...ions/elections_fra....

###

Not voting is a crime - voting for a candidate because it is popular is unforgivable.

Can a reasonable, rational person really vote for Barack Obama?

http://www.saynobama.org

That's just it: Overwhelmingly sane and even intelligent people are voting for and endorsing Obama....even some rightnuts like yourself - even some Republican newspapers who have NEVER endorsed a democrat.....yes, my friend, there is no comparison in this election whatsoever.

Comparing caviar to tuna fish is about the size of it. McLame is just that: a lame brained, cancer infested, unintelligent moron whose idiocy is only superseded by his chronic need to shoot himself in the foot. McCain has brought the terms capricious and reckless to a new definition; unfortunately, it's due to his profound senile dementia that he is so.

American is riding a tidal wave of change, my friend (or is it my fellow prisoner).

Being able to handle two thoughts at the same time might be a good start for McCain who can't seem to remember what he ate for breakfast this morning any better than what he said in his moronic rants yesterday on the stump.

We don't take too kindly to trolls here so I suspect that you might want to be moving along. You, my troll, thankfully only represent those loser - those 22 percenters out there on the wingnut fringe of society.

Get lost - but then again you're probably not welcome on your red state threads either.

We don't fall for moronic tricks of village idiots here.

All of us rational thinking people will be voting for Obama.

You can join us. Open your mind and listen to what he's saying.

Ayers is the new Ward Churchill ... except that Ayers will not only be booted from his job, he'll be torn apart by a crazed lynchmob as well.

...in the Toronto Star today put the Ayers controversy in a whole different perspective for me. Ayers today is a well-respected professor of education at the University of Chicago. And it seems to me that his criticisms of US policy during the Vietnam War era were justified, even if his method of response was not.

Man behind Obama's radical headache

Ayers' connection to the Weather Underground is plastered on his door. A postcard for a documentary on the group shows an old mugshot of Ayers. Nearby is cover art from Ayers' 2001 memoir, Fugitive Days.

But also affixed to the door is the title that reflects how Ayers, now 63, has become known in the past two decades in Chicago: distinguished professor.

"He gives of himself greatly to his students. He gives of his time, his energies, his commitment," said Pamela Quiroz, an associate professor who works in the college of education with Ayers. "He is just a superb individual."

Quiroz is among more than 3,200 people, mostly academics, who have signed an online petition protesting the "demonization" of Ayers during the campaign for the White House.

This is a very thoughtful article and well worth the read, but hurry. The Star doesn't leave things on their servers for more than a few days.

I find it uncanny that McCain would choose to throw stones when everyone knows he lives in a glass house filled with international terrorists and domestic terrorists of his own.

Gordon Liddy, for example - and McCain was a grown man (for all intents and purposes) as he pals around with this criminal. And that's just for openers....

The fact is that Obama doesn't have to lower himself to smear McCain because the american people know all about the REAL POW/MIA McCain coverup, we know all about his connections with his own fringe terrorist group as well as his connections with the Kremlin. McCain doesn't have a leg to stand on and only loads his own Depends each time he smears Obama.

McCain has become a national Joke!

Ayers was an obvious choice to demonize for McCain.
He is still fighting over the war in Viet Nam. The enemy of the war monger is always the peace activist.

I have to make a slight correction to your comment. William Ayers is a professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC),not the University of Chicago, and he is definitely well respected as an educator and admired for his contributions to the entire Chicago community.

The sad fact about all of this is that the University of Nebraska will be remembered for their decision to cancel his lecture as a capitulation to Nazi/Fascist tactics while demonstrating an absolute lack of courage and dedication to the First Amendment.

I am very proud of the work that we do here. Unfortunately, we are an island of logic and reasonable thought in a vast sea of bigotry and narrow-mindedness that is this state. Given the fact that this is one of the reddest states in the union (the Republican candidate could bite the head off a small child on national TV and still receive 55% of the vote here), it unfortunately does not shock me too much that a number of the small minded inhabitants of this state would threaten violence and/or funding cuts (re: Gov. Heineman - Republican (shock)).

Feel free to send him a message here http://www.governor.nebraska.gov/mail/govmail...

Whatever transgressions Mr. Ayers may have committed during another part of his life are something he will have to answer for when he meets the great cloud being, but for today I would have to say that we have to remember that repentance comes in many forms - including deeds.

...So could someone tell me by what twisted logic the rights of "Joe the Plumber" are being infringed upon by doing a background check?

that Malkin led the charge against 12 year old Graeme Frost when he did a response to the whole SCHIP debate. They camped out on the parents lawn, investigated financials, left awful messages, but that was perfectly ok with Malkin.

We won't have to endure much more of Michele Malkin. I hear her career's swirling the toilet right now. 3/4 of america won't watch her show so I suspect that she's well on her way to becoming an irrelevant cipher.

The best thing about living here in New Mexico is that you're so close to the USofA...

prob'ly that's the worst thing, too...

Read this and ship it around for some bedtime reading. McCain's a fraud. But there's so much more.....BRB...

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081020/ames_be...

.

Q U E S T I O N:

Why aren't the media, the press, and reporters hitting Johnny McLobbyist about his transition chief's ties to Saddam Hussein?

WHY ALL THE SILENCE...
... To give Obama all the room to continually defend his ties to Ayers?

You do know, that the more one continually is placed into the defensive position, the more it appears that s/he is guilty of something that must be defended against...NO?

I think it is high time that blogs like C&L stop the senseless defense and repetition of needless defenses of Obama and begin to ATTACK McCun't for who he is!!! I mean, sure there was a blurb once about McCaint's transition chief... A FRICKIN' blurb!!! Where's the hard hitting, continual punching guys???

Shhhhh...
... maybe we need to defend Obama's non-ties to terrorists a little bit more, then the regular folk will get the idea that maybe we're covering for something... NO?

I just wish once, o.k. it happened once and only once to Tucker and he said STFU and everyone did and continues to behave so, however we should't forget...
... John McCain's transition chief lobbied on behalf of Saddam Hussein!!!
... What does that make John McCain???

.

McCain about his ties to G. Gordon Liddy. If the MSM went after this lead, McCain would have shut up about Ayres a long time ago.

BINGO!!!

With one caveat...
... Letterman is dismissible to the ABCNNBCBS&FOXPRAVDA crowd because he's a late-night talk show/comedian. Great for a laugh if you're up that late, otherwise, no one cares because it's just supposed to be comedy.

Letterman did a more substantial interview with McCain than half the reporters, pundits and anchors on the MSM. However, his treatment of McCain was more like a slap in the face for standing him up. And bringing Liddy on the show and ambushing McCain with it was a kick below the belt that the old man will never forget.

I liked the slick way he brought up Liddy's connection to McCain. Dave is still very angry.

eom

Keating, Liddy, all the lobbyists, the list of transgressions by McCain is enormous...and completely ignored.

There is no 4th estate. The 2nd oldest profession is dead.

I think we need to demand the MSM to put credible people in these positions rather than just paid entertainers reading the teleprompter. Although there are some great people who take their work seriously with doing hard hitting stories, reporters of that caliber are a dying breed.

Instead, we've got the FOX-ification of news enveloping the profession a great deal more.

I think the only hope that we have left is not only independent journalists who don't answer to the conglomerates and, of course, the bloggers.

We've got two long weeks to trickle out some of McCain's dubious connections and come out they will.

Timmons and his lobbying for Saddam Hussein, Bush's boogeyman will open the week, then comes Jack Singlaub, nazi collaborator and affiliated with nazi death squads, followed by Carl Lindner, CEO Chiquita who is affiliated with a terrorist regime in Columbia (AUC and FARC) and that's just to open the week next week.

There's so much more on Rick Davis of Davis Mannefort and his illegal ties to the dissolution of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae to explore.

Then there's always the present-day domestic terrorist Gordon Liddy for some headlines....

But for now, here's the POW/MIA story John McCain's covering up

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081006/schanberg

Two long weeks to go and ten long months wasted so far NOT mentioning this crap...
... Or is it, we only have two long weeks left to not mention this crap, at all?

to the point that it becomes an art form. They don't protest. They strong arm and lean on the powers that be until it gets results.

Talk about the Nazi youth and the Brownshirts.

They have no right to bring up Free Speech ever again.

Being a "conservative feminist" is like being a "recovered" sex addict who just happens to eat lunch every day at the nearest strip club.

What does Palin do best? I will tell you. She lends credence to all the dark things the right-wing male chauvinist pigs believe in from militarism to imperialism to racism to sexism to homophobia to false cries of "patriotism."

There is no reason for people of any group who have been oppressed in America to view things from the dominant, or master, white-patriarchial point of view, which justifies the subjugation and prejudice of non-white males or people who may be gay, etc.

The right wing and their pals on the Christian right have gone on 21st Century witch-hunts in this presidential campaign and did so as well during the early years of the Bush administration into the war on Iraq. Remember the male chauvinist pigs who went after the Dixie Chicks and the right-wing, homophobic-racist-bigoted talk show hosts across the country?

Sarah Palin is an evil woman who bolsters the most ugly side of the white-male dominant culture. It is fine to oppose the long-held white male master narrative of the United States of America and say that oppression, enslavement, and oppression of all sorts are part of the ugly and dark sides of America's past history.

The murder of Matthew Shephard, in Wyoming several years ago shows just how the ugly hate of Americans are against oppressed groups of people. Amendments to ban gay marriage only encourage the violence done to gays, lesbians and transgendered Americans. This cannot be accepted any longer. If you are silent on this issue, you share some of the blame done when violence is perpetrared on GLBT Americans. The dragging murder of James Byrd, (he was also mentally retarded) in Texas is yet another example of the accepted hatred and violence of Americans onto other Americans. These murders just mentioned have been enabled by he hatred of "Christian right" preachers like Pat Robertson and Franklin Graham and politicians like Rick Santorum, Michelle Bachmann, Jim DeMint, and Tom Coburn, including, right-wing talk radio show hosts like Michael Savage, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, and Rush Limbaugh.

America still has yet to atone for its past crimes against the American Indians, women, blacks for slavery and the crimes against humanity in the Vietnam war and the wars on Iraq and Afghanistan.

.

Q U E S T I O N:

If Johnny McAnti-feminist picked Sarah to counter the "Librul" feminists...
... Will Sarah relinquish her Right to vote?

.

Embittered:

If Johnny McAnti-feminist picked Sarah to counter the "Librul" feminists...
... Will Sarah relinquish her Right to vote?

This very thread provides the answer.

Of course she won't relinquish her right to vote. She'll extinguish ours.

David,

You are actually describing a critical defining characteristic of sociopaths/psychopaths: their incapacity to experience moral outrage on another's behalf. They are routinely able to experience and express a hieghtened sense of moral outrage for real, or imagined, wrongs. But that capacity functions exclusively in response to wrongs happening to their own persons. A wrongful event occuring to their person, which produces tremendous moral outrage, elicits no response at all if the identical wrong happens to another. More, a sociopath or psychopath can rage against an actual or imagined wrong committed against their own person, but turn right around, with their very next breath, and sel-righteously commit the identcal wrong upon another's person, seeing nothing odd or unacceptable about doing so. Being that the Republican party has become a magnet for maladjusted and malignant personalities, it should not be a surprise to anybody that the right-wingers routinely demonstrate the kind of compartmentalized thinking and awarness that you describe.

Some half baked Rethuglican supporting redneck is going to take all of this crap to heart and read it all as gospel. Obama may win the election, but he better have the most personal security of any president EVER. I fear he won't even survive one term and that is truly sad.

Without going too far into this ethically challenged fraud because she simply isn't worth the time to do so, I believe Palin's ties to known anti-US Secessionists Mark Chryson and Steve Stoll along with her videotaped pledge of support to this group in 2006 and 2008 means that even Sarah Palin cannot get security clearance at this point. It goes without saying that Todd Palin will never receive security clearance so I believe that her own support and contact with this anti-US fringe group will probably disqualify her and already has in the minds of most americans.

We don't even have to go into her reed-thin resume and her total lack of experience (in her office 85 days out of two years??).

Here's the skinny on Palin's "terrorist pals" -
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/10/10/...

One chromosome comes down to it - that's THE only connection Palin has to progressive, intelligent women of today. She drags her handicapped infant around like it's a fake prop and can't even manage her own family. Obviously, Todd's been the "shadow governor" as we see how pathetically underqualified she is to work and have a family, too.

Palin's a disgrace to american women who have made something of their lives.

She's a total embarrassment to this country right now as we become an international laughingstock.

We've had a fake president for 8 years; now we have a fake veep candidate as well.

I suppose they have had bomb threats. That is the standard attack.

With Colin Powell's endorsement of Barack Obama, John McCain is in DEEP political DOO-DOO.

And so is SILLY SARAH (Palin). OsiSpeaks.com

While George Will's cable show was cancelled, before I even knew it existed, he was snickering about Hillary's right-wing conspiracy. But when his show was cancelled did he blame Adam Smith's Invisible Hand of the Marketplace? Hell no, he blamed a left-wing cabal.

But on the plus side he wrote a final view in Time magazine how he and his wife laughed through the torture-porn movie The Passion, because the human body doesn't contain that much blood.

)O(

He actually wrote a movie review that said THAT? Link plz.

Has anyone ever noticed that Republicans are the most ardent practitioners of the kind of affirmative action they decry (and no one wants)? According to them, affirmative action is itself racism, and results only in unqualified individuals wresting positions from their superiors. As with their complaint that government does not work, the response is, "Yeah, the way you do it."

Upon the death of Thurgood Marshall, the Republicans knew that his Supreme Court seat just had to be filled by a black man. Forget qualifications, said Papa Bush, just find me a conservative black man. Result: Clarence Thomas.

Always determined to outdo his father, and to prove to the world what a different, compassionate conservative he was, Shrub diversified his administration. Result: Condoleeza Rice, Alberto Gonzales.

And, of course, John McCain had to choose a woman for his vice president.

It's not new that they are hypocrites in the AA matter. The Republicans whine about "merits" and "quotas". As a result, we continuously have to put up with their plethora of unqualified ideologues who only serve their masters and little more going on upstairs. I think they just do it to thumb their nose at the notion of an "equal playing field".

But, it is funny when all of their whining exposes them for the racists they are.

I just want to ask them what merits does Palin, Quayle and Dubya have that makes them more qualifed than, for example, Barack Obama?

I look forward to many decades from now, when I can watch a debate with my grandchildren, wherein the lesbian Latina presidential nominee of the successful offshoot of the Democratic Party turns to her sad, uneducated, theocratic and utterly inexperienced opponent, who has just made an unconscionable comparison, and says,

"Sir, I knew Barack Obama. President Barack Obama was my friend. You, sir, are no Barack Obama."

Obviously right wing domestic terrorism is going to be the next problem. His administration will need all the tools they have at their disposal to swiftly put these people behind bars.

)O(

Federal Sugar Inhaling Act?

FISA

Thanks for the "catch"

Sugar Boarding

Some clearly non-spam messages in youtube video comment section have been marked as spam. One of those messages was this:

"For voters, a vote for socialist policies can mean that they WANT some of their money to be taken so that it can be given to others, but only IF other rich-enough s too have to give some of their money so that it can be given to others. So, unlike charity, socialism can be viewed as a contract between rich-enough-people that "if I give, others give too (because tax officials make them give)" Then, the tax officials enforce the contract between the contractees i.e. voters."

It was on this video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=wH4r9uzqB2o

When are we going to rise above all the petty issues and start talking about things that really affect our lives, like achieving ENERGY INDEPENDENCE. Obama and McCain both say that is their top priority, however they say it will take 10 years (conveniently after they would be out of office).

There are technologies available today to give us Clean, Renewable ENERGY in a year even (especially if we took just a fraction of what is being spent in Iraq).

I am not talking about BS stuff like bio, nuclear, coal or more oil, I am talking about wind, solar, tidal, geothermal and electric/magnetic (also hydrogen using Tesla methods not conventional methods). The best thing about these is that they are abundant, completely clean, and renewable.

Whoever gets elected needs to be reminded that this is the top priority and not allowed to slack off on this. Look up Tesla and geothermal energy and check out some videos on it, also zeitgeist:addendum for more info.

What was that "Waiting for someone to scream racist!" remark?

... if Ayers' is given a platform where he may present his demeanor, intellect and current beliefs, then the 'boogey-man terrorist' label would diminish a measurable degree. Why doesn't a Democratic-leaning media outlet provide the invite and let Ayers speak? Or, is he really *that* radical? I do not believe that, but the Obama camp can not let this 'Ayers+Obama=TerroristInTheWhiteHouse' fear mongering fester for too much longer ... it's taking its toll.

at the risk of breaking the tone to the very educated conversation going currently...whats the name of that U2 song on the video. i quite fancy it

It's a great song, isn't it? It's from 2004's "Album."

77 comments

Login or Register to post comments.