Matthews Blasts Rep. Scalise For Playing 'Pure Partisan Politics' On How BP Escrow Account Is Being Managed

Well, Chris Matthews has been wanting to get a Republican on his show who was willing to defend Rush Limbaugh for some time now. He decided to put Lou
up

Well, Chris Matthews has been wanting to get a Republican on his show who was willing to defend Rush Limbaugh for some time now. He decided to put Louisiana Rep. Steve Scalise into that box whether he wanted to be or not. Matthews ripped into him for refusing to distance himself from Limbaugh's comments that the escrow fund the President got BP to set up is a "shakedown". What Matthews fails to note here is that is the Republican leadership's point of view. They were only upset with Smokey Joe Barton for apologizing to BP, not for calling the escrow account a "shakedown".

Maybe one of these days we can see Matthews get this aggressive with Tom DeLay instead of kissing his ass every time he comes on his show, rather than being this harsh with a Congressman who represents a state that has their coastline being drowned in oil right now. If Matthews wanted to inform his viewers about whether Rep. Scalise's criticisms were valid or hypocritical on the response to this disaster, he should have asked him if he thinks offshore drilling can be done safely and how that industry should be regulated rather than playing a game of gotcha' on whether he agrees with Rush Limbaugh or not. Tweety really just looked like he was in the mood to play the bully with someone over his "will any Republicans disagree with Rush Limbaugh" obsession.

MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL.

Today, as we reported, a federal judge blocked President Obama’s six- month moratorium on deepwater drilling.

Joining me right now is Congressman Steve Scalise, a Republican from Louisiana.

Congressman, I have to ask you this. Here’s Rush Limbaugh on the Joe Barton comment today.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP, "THE RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOW")

RUSH LIMBAUGH: It was a shakedown, pure and simple. And somebody had the audacity to call it what it was, and now everybody is running for the hills.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: Well, that was yesterday, actually, but it’s been 42 days now since we have been asking Republican members of Congress to stand up and say Rush Limbaugh doesn’t speak for the Republican Party.

Congressman Scalise, here’s your chance. Is it Rush Limbaugh or your leadership that is right on Joe Barton?

REP. STEVE SCALISE: Well, first of all, Joe Barton has apologized. I spoke with him the other day. And I accept his apology.

What frustrates me is that you still don’t see the sense of urgency from this administration. And they have got the legal responsibility to direct the efforts on the ground. And they’re just not doing it. That is what angers people back home in South Louisiana, where I just came back from over just earlier today.

MATTHEWS: Well, my job is to ask these questions. Do you think that Rush Limbaugh is right, it was a shakedown? Is he and Barton right? Or is the leadership right in saying it was wrong to apologize on the part of the Republican Party to BP?

SCALISE: Well, unfortunately, I didn’t get the opportunity to listen to his show. I like his show. I think he offers a lot of good, interesting commentary.

But the bottom line is, when you look at what’s not happening on the ground -- and our local leaders will tell you, just the other day, we had vacuum barges that were sent back to the docks by the Coast Guard, and they gave absolutely no reason why those barges, which would have been sucking up oil, that would have prevented oil from getting into our marsh, were sent back to the docks.

It -- spent over a day where the Coast Guard gave absolutely no explanation. And the federal government, still to this day, won’t tell us who is in charge when problems go on the ground like they’re doing just two, three days ago. I mean, this is inexcusable. We cannot afford these kinds of delays.

MATTHEWS: Well, what about the big news that the federal government has asked BP to set aside a $20 billion escrow account? Some Republicans like Joe Barton have said that that’s a shakedown, that that is wrong, it’s a slush fund.

Rush Limbaugh agrees with that point of view. Your party leadership doesn’t. Who speaks for you, your party leadership on that point or Rush Limbaugh on that point? Who is your leader?

SCALISE: Well, Chris, I speak for myself. And John Boehner is the Republican leader. But if you look at what’s going on out there, we haven’t been given any details on how this money is going to be spent. I sure hope it doesn’t become some kind of a slush fund where Washington bureaucrats spend the money on things that aren’t related to people on the ground.

My main concern is that the money gets into the hands of those people who are affected.

MATTHEWS: How is that, wait a minute. What is that -- what is that attack you’re making here? First of all, will you answer the question? Is Rush Limbaugh right here or wrong?

SCALISE: Well, again, I didn’t listen to his comments earlier, Chris. But what I’ve said is, I want real transparency and accountability with the money.

MATTHEWS: He called it a shakedown. Is it a shakedown?

SCALISE: I wasn’t in the meetings, Chris. But, I mean, again, where is the money going to be spent?

MATTHEWS: Why are you guys -- why is everybody in the Republican Party afraid of Limbaugh, a radio talk show host? When he says something totally contradictive to your party leadership, can’t you say, "I’m with the party leadership"?

SCALISE: Of course, I speak for myself. I told you who I speak for, and that’s myself. Nobody else speaks for me. And ultimately, I’m trying to solve problems on the ground and they’re still not getting fixed.

MATTHEWS: OK. OK. Just to make it simple. Rush Limbaugh does not speak for you on the issue whether BP was shaken down or not?

SCALISE: No, he doesn’t speak for me. I speak for myself.

MATTHEWS: OK.

SCALISE: But ultimately, I’m going to continue fighting to try to make sure that the money gets into the hands of those people who are affected, and many of them still have not gotten help. But ultimately, that our leaders get the help they need on the ground, to get the oil out of our marsh. And they’re not going a good enough job at that right now.

MATTHEWS: What don’t you like about the decisions of an escrow account? You’re accusing the administration of taking the money and putting it into some sort of political patronage fund. What makes you believe that the administration will decide where that money goes? Where did you get that idea?

SCALISE: Well, Chris, first, I’ve never made that accusation. What I’ve said is --

MATTHEWS: Well, you’re saying it.

SCALISE: I’ve asked to find out where that money is going to go, how it’s going to be spent. I think even the guy running the fund over the weekend wouldn’t really tell anybody how it’s going to be set up. So, ultimately, when you’re talking about $20 billion that’s supposed to go for people in the Gulf Coast who are affected by this oil spill, I think we all want to make sure that it’s spent helping those people whose way of life right now is destroyed.

I don’t think people want to see that wasted on government bureaucracy here in Washington. It needs to get to the hands of people on the ground.

MATTHEWS: Well, whose -- who said 1 cent of it is going to a bureaucracy in Washington? Who says that? Where do you get that idea from that you’re concerned about?

SCALISE: I’ve never said -- well, I never said I’ve got the idea. I said I want to make sure that doesn’t happen because no one will tell us.

MATTHEWS: Well, what makes you think it would happen? Why are you going after a straw man -- a red herring here?

(CROSSTALK)

SCALISE: -- because it’s happened before.

MATTHEWS: Where has it happened before?

SCALISE: -- to Social Security trust fund --

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: Oh, here we go. This is --

SCALISE: -- everyday on things that have nothing to do with Social Security. I want to make sure that fund gets in the hands of people who deserve it. And no one told us what that money is going to be used for yet. I think we deserved that answer.

MATTHEWS: In other words, you are using -- this is just -- this is just pure, pure partisan politics, what you’re doing here.

SCALISE: You know, Chris, I don’t know why you’re not concerned where the $20 billion is going to go.

MATTHEWS: Because you’re attacking something that’s never happened. It’s never happened with this. You think BP is going to make some checks out, to what, welfare recipients, or are they going to make checks out to people who have legal claims against them?

SCALISE: Do you know? Because right now, we’re not seeing the stuff getting down --

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: Because the only way they’re going to spend a nickel is if their own fiduciary responsibility allows them to make payments which could only be the people with legal claims against them.

SCALISE: So, you’re telling me that BP is going to run this fund? Who’s going to run the fund, Chris?

MATTHEWS: Apparently, it’s going to be run --

SCALISE: I don’t know if you know that. I sure don’t. I’d like to know. I think the people on the Gulf Coast have a right to know.

MATTHEWS: OK. So, you’re accusation --

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: OK. Right. Well, that’s fair enough. It’s just -- it’s just pure politics. Thank you, Congressman Steve Scalise for joining us now.

Let’s go -- let’s bring Bart Stupak.

I don’t know where that charge came from right there. Nobody out there believes this is going to -- and this thing about the Social Security fund is classic partisan nonsense. OK? Absolute nonsense.

The Social Security fund is challenged because there are more old people now than compared to the number of young people there are now in a pay-as-you-go system. And anybody understands that who pays any attention to Social Security.

Anyway, let’s go to Bart Stupak.

There was a straw man, a classic way to get some right wing votes. Let’s go now to Joe Barton.

About Heather

Comments

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.