Question for Sharron Angle: What part of "Second Amendment Remedy" was out of context?
Sharron Angle thinks the media has taken her out of context -- what a shocker!
When CNN caught up with Angle at one of her Las Vegas campaign stops, she complained some of her more controversial statements had been taken out of context. "As you speak, as we're conversationally speaking, sometimes when you pick out words, they're not the best words you could have used," she told CNN in a rare one-on-one interview. "When taken out of context, you can make anybody look like they don't know what they're talking about," she elaborated.
Harry Reid disagrees.
"It's a little hard to take out of context when they say they want to phase out Social Security," Reid responded to CNN. "Her words are what she is. My words are what I am. So I don't think you can run from what you say and what you do."
There's an epidemic of contextual errors these days, it seems. Is Angle saying that she didn't mean it when she talked about "second amendment remedies" with regard to the Obama administration? Or did I misunderstand the context of her reference to "domestic enemies" inside this Administration? What part of "eliminate the Department of Education" did they get out of context? Perhaps Angle can supply some much needed context to her remarks about the unemployed being spoiled, lazy, or 13-15 year old rape victims making the best of a 'bad situation'.
Not to worry, my friends. Sharron Angle promises she'll be a "mainstream Senator". Or did the media get the context wrong on that, too? The only way Sharron Angle would be mainstream is if the river ran right through the Republic of Crazy.
Sharon Angle should be put away where she can't harm herself or others...
Now, don't take that out of context or anything!
"I could give a flying crap about the political process.... We're an entertainment company."
- Glenn Beck - Forbes interview; April 26, 2010
for the interviewer to ask Angle specifically what the contextual framework of her statements was? Or did he just not want to hear another rambling, incoherent, stream of conciousness foray into libertarian lala land?
You wouldn't want them to be accused of serious journalism, would you? :)
Look,it's all really very simple.
All of the statements I've made in the past that reflect favorably on me are accurate,while every other idiotic backward, backstabbing, rat fucking,ultra right wing wad of specious sputum I've ever spouted is a damned lie concocted by the Liberal Media God dammit.
"To me, truth is not some vague, foggy notion. Truth is real. And,
at the same time, unreal. Fiction and fact and everything in between,
plus some things I can't remember, all rolled into one big "thing."
This is truth, to me. "
-Jack Handy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yj3DBcpfMNQ
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
*muted trumpet laugh*
Wha wha wha whaaaaaaaaaaa!
"To me, truth is not some vague, foggy notion. Truth is real. And,
at the same time, unreal. Fiction and fact and everything in between,
plus some things I can't remember, all rolled into one big "thing."
This is truth, to me. "
-Jack Handy
This woman belongs in a padded room along with the rest of the repug wingnuts.
I wish they would stop calling her a "former teacher." As far as I could find out, she was a substitute teacher. This is probably because she didn't have teaching credentials, which is not required of subs. Whether she still spread her strange views on life to kids, or not, brings another scary part to her saga!
ljmel
"Substitute your lies for fact
I can see right through your plastic mac.."
The Who
"To me, truth is not some vague, foggy notion. Truth is real. And,
at the same time, unreal. Fiction and fact and everything in between,
plus some things I can't remember, all rolled into one big "thing."
This is truth, to me. "
-Jack Handy
A substitute teacher? At McDonalds Burger University? Connecticut School of Broadcasting? Clown College?
"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."
that Harry Reid may actually come out of this election looking like the underdog/good guy? Oy, what a world.
Before enlightenment - chop wood, carry water. After enlightenment - chop wood, carry water.
Harry's a pain in the arse.
Still...things could be much,much worse-a notion I hope forces Progressives to hold their collective noses and vote.
"To me, truth is not some vague, foggy notion. Truth is real. And,
at the same time, unreal. Fiction and fact and everything in between,
plus some things I can't remember, all rolled into one big "thing."
This is truth, to me. "
-Jack Handy
Things have to be viewed in context?
"I mean Romney is the most conservative on illegal immigration and I don't think Ronald Reagan could get elected in California today."
Ann "Clipped" Coulter
Angle, idiot that she is, is right about taking things out of context. If you look at the clip and read the
text from CNN, both include the out of context quotes, but because both are edited, you do not know what comments, if any at all, the idiot might be claiming are taken out of context.
In the clip it appears the "out of context" remark is about her idiotic statements about Social Secuty and Medicare being phased out. In the printed version, the remark is about "some of her more controversial statements." CNN does not elaborate on which of the idiot Angle's remarks those might be. Just these two examples show how a change in contexts can be made. Without printing or showing the clip of the question she was responding to, you have no idea which, if any, nonsense utterances she is claiming can be better understood contextually. Surely, you, karoli, know that "you can make anybody look like they don't know what they're talking about."
For example, someone bluntly asserted something about "her reference to "domestic enemies" inside this Administration?" That person must be crazy because Angle has never made such a reference. They must not know what they are talking about.
"I mean Romney is the most conservative on illegal immigration and I don't think Ronald Reagan could get elected in California today."
Ann "Clipped" Coulter
October 21, 2009, with conservative radio host Bill Manders.
MANDERS: You know I talk often about this oath that they give and it is to defend the Constitution and all that. But one of the things that is very important to me in this oath that they give is that they will defend against foreign and domestic enemies.
ANGLE: Yes. Yes.
MANDERS: We have domestic enemies. We have home-born homegrown enemies in our system. And I for one think we have some of those enemies in the walls of the Senate and the Congress.
ANGLE: Yes. I think you're right, Bill.
Full audio link available:
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/20...
I pledge allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America, and to the republic which it established, one nation from many peoples, promising liberty and justice for all
I would be factually accurate to say "C&L's extraordinarily insightful and usually accurate blogger karoli wrote "did I misunderstand the context of her reference to "domestic enemies" inside this Administration?"
I would be factually accurate to say Angle never made such a reference.
I would be factually accurate to say karoli did misunderstand the context of Angle's reference because such a reference was never made.
I would be factually accurate to say, by agreeing with a radio hosts broad charge there were domestic enemies "in the wall of the Senate and the Congress, Angle left open the charge that Republicans in the House might be domestic enemies or capable of insect like infestation of constuction in our Capitol.
Finally, I would be correct in saying she said nothing and implied nothing about anyone in the Obama administration.
"I mean Romney is the most conservative on illegal immigration and I don't think Ronald Reagan could get elected in California today."
Ann "Clipped" Coulter
...was because I have heard her *in context* enough to know she's as wacker-dee-doo as she appears when taken out of context. Take, for example, the "second amendment remedies" remark. Whatever context that appears in, it still means the same thing. Similarly, the affirmation (now 5 or 6 different times) that there are "enemies of the state within" is another one that shouldn't go unnoticed.
Those two references alone make any context around Social Security and education look incredibly mild, whether in, or out of, context.
The woman is nuts. plain and simple.
Sharon Angle the preferred representative for rapists reproduction rights. Sharon Angle ensuring a future generation of rapists are born and that the mothers are slave baby factories without the right to choose regardless of age.
So how then does she propose to get rid of these Republicans?
Since they are "inside the walls", here is my recommendation:
http://signup.orkin.com/orkin/res/tc-Standard...
"I mean Romney is the most conservative on illegal immigration and I don't think Ronald Reagan could get elected in California today."
Ann "Clipped" Coulter
the river does run through the Republic of Crazy.
If Sharron Angle thinks her comments are "taken out of context" maybe she should keep her mouth shut, or at least think before she speaks. After all, a closed mouth gathers no foot.
What a moron.
ABC news just had a story making it sound like she's pulling ahead. Still no word that traditional poll taking is irretrievably harmed by a younger set who have no traditional land-line.
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
Gee, how can't that mean:
-Buying guns and ammo
-Barracading yourself inside your house
-Joining a rapture ready ready militia
-Tossing democracy in the garbage
-Tossing due process of law in the garbage?
Divine Right of Kings (1600's); Divine Right of Corporations (2011)
...since I learned about obtuse angles in Geometry. They weren't very sharp at their points then, and seem even duller today...
Maybe that phrase "second amendment solution" realy doesn't have anything to do with guns. Maybe it's something about bears.
Having to choose between Angle (someone I wouldn't vote for...EVER) and Harry Reid (someone who makes me sick to my stomach) would really suck. The first part...not voting for Angle...would be a breeze, but the second part, forcing myself to actually vote FOR Reid would be extraordinarily painful. In order to bring myself to vote for Reid, I might have to have Angle's words on a continuous loop playing in headphones. That could do it. That could definitely do it.
I agree. It was taken out of context. It was only MEANT to be said in the context of having people around who would cheer about it, instead of finding it completely horrifying.
She is just 30 cents away from having a qurter, what were the republicans thinking when they found this candidate, seriously.
Get used to her inane, ridiculous, nonsense-sounding drivel. She's a tea party creation, and as such she has the billions of dollars given by the petroleum-rich Koch Brothers to create the tea party movement behind her. No matter how bad she sounds, the billionaire Koch brothers from Wichita will keep promoting her, keep buying time on network and local TV for her, keep pouring money into her campaign.
Crazy Sharron Angle, thanks to those generous Wichita Koch boys, is promoting laws against the majority of Americans, laws which favor the Koch brothers, so they aren't about to stop supporting her. The US Supreme Court, the "George W. Bush Supreme Court" recently ruled that billionaires like the Koch brothers can spend unlimited funds for nut whacko idiots like Sharron Angle and we don't even have the right to know where the money is coming from.
This is not the way a democracy is supposed to work.
Get used to it.
Comments are closed on this entry