C&L Movie Review: W by Oliver Stone
Oh my name it is nothin'
My age it means less
The country I come from
Is called the Midwest
I's taught and brought up there
The laws to abide
And the land that I live in
Has God on its side.
With God On Our Side by Bob Dylan
As the end credits roll marking the finale of W and the completion of director Oliver Stone’s troika of Presidential bio-pics (JFK, Nixon, W), the voice of another generation lashes out of the screen. Almost a half-century-old now, With God On Our Side recorded by Bob Dylan in 1963, served as a litany of American hubris and military actions which are philosophically defended by claiming to have God on the side of America.
The Iraq War can now be added to that list.
W is a far, far better picture than I expected. It is not as some critics have suggested, a black comedy. It is not a farce. While there are some loopy dream sequences and flights of fancy, it is a powerful, straightforward biography depicting the guilt-ridden son of a hugely successful man.
James Cromwell masterfully plays that hugely successful man – George Herbert Walker Bush and Josh Brolin astonishingly portrays that guilt-ridden son - George W. Bush. Both performances are spot on in their capturing the personas of their targets. Similarly shocking is the performance by Jeffrey Wright as Colin Powell who serves as the only rational voice in the Alice-in-Wonderland cabinet meetings Stone portrays. The casting is absolutely brilliant as is the make-up. Thandi Newton is scary as Condoleezza Rice. But audiences will be stunned by the performance of Elizabeth Banks as Laura Bush. Her look and sound is captured so well you feel this is actually the wife of the 43rd President. In addition, seamless Zelig-like post-production work allows the main actors to slide into famous recorded news events such as State of the Union speeches and the like.
Dr. Evil, Vice President Dick Cheney is underplayed marvelously by the great Richard Dreyfuss.
The real credit has to go to Josh Brolin who becomes George W. Bush. At first you don’t buy it, but after a few minutes of Bush’s college years you are hooked. In fact, when I came home and put on the news, there was the actual Bush and I thought of Brolin. That’s powerful. Oliver Stone has done this before with great actors. For instance, try looking at the real Jim Morrison after viewing the great Val Kilmer in Stone’s classic The Doors.
Tip: Most fans of The Daily Show might not even recognize Rob Corddry as Presidential press secretary Ari Fleisher. Oh, and by the way, Toby Jones (the “second” Truman Capote) is great as the weasel Karl Rove.
As in The Doors, JFK and Nixon, alcohol is always an uncredited character. W is awash in booze. Booze being poured through funnels into the mouths of college students. Booze in bars. Booze at bar-b-ques. Booze in almost every early scene. In fact, it is so omnipresent that when it is removed – in this case by Bush’s supposed “white light experience” - Stone makes sure we always see the label on all those bottles of O’Douls the abstinent Bush swigs down. And this is just not for product placement (Rumors of Bush’s drinking have swarmed the zeitgeist ever since the start of his second term).
W was written by Stanley Weiser, who also wrote Wall Street for Oliver Stone back in 1987.
You may think you know everything there is to know about President George W. Bush. I guarantee you, you don’t. Oliver Stone’s W, will fill in a few of those blank spots that have left you scratching your freakin’ head for eight long years.
You will sleep better for it and for the knowledge that Bush’s days in the White House are literally numbered.
For that alone, the cinematic ride is worth it.


It was interesting, but only 3 1/2 stars.
Please. Anyone reading this. Watch this interview from Michelle Bachman. She's the incumbent House of Representative from MN. Soak it all in here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vbw4pdxVSOg
And then donate money here:
http://www.tinklenberg08.com/
I don't want to know anything else about him. I just want him gone.
After living through 8 years of Bush, I will not voluntarily forfeit 2 hours of my life to watch his biopic.
Why do I need to relive it?
I'll wait for the Erroll Morris documentary to come out.
After hearing stories made-up by the bush Administration (and its foot soldiers) since at least 1999, I don't think I need any fictionalized accounts of this period. We're still too close to it. Historical fiction works better in hindsight, otherwise it becomes revisionism.
I'd settle for the damned truth.
It's out on DVD. I will be watching it tonight.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/10/20/1815...
http://www.katv.com/news/stories/1008/562863....
Little Rock TV anchorwoman Anne Pressly, who plays Ann Coulter in Oliver Stone's new movie W., was left in critical condition after beaten and stabbed in her home sometime late Sunday.
How sad. I hope she's OK.
comments from two random Kossacks on that thread, but the 99% majority thought.
I bet you they would still be saying "lets wait until we get concrete details of where we are going..." as the cattle truck doors slammed shut on them.
There are an awful lot of rose tinted spectacle wearing cat worshiping people on that website, coincidence not conspiracy types.
In a normal law abiding climate its OK to be innocent, in Bushco world it pays to be skeptical and paranoid.
As a suspect? Why would they not be looking for the obvious.
as a subject in this matter. If not, why?
But they never showed it...I wondered if it had anything to do with the film...
That's disturbing...I hope they find the sick fuck that did it.
Wonder if it was Coulter and Malkin...they seem like they'd get a little stabby over shit.
But they never showed it...I wondered if it had anything to do with the film...
That's disturbing...I hope they find the sick fuck that did it.
Wonder if it was Coulter and Malkin...they seem like they'd get a little stabby over shit.
But they never showed it...I wondered if it had anything to do with the film...
That's disturbing...I hope they find the sick fuck that did it.
Wonder if it was Coulter and Malkin...they seem like they'd get a little stabby over shit.
But the news I was watching, never followed up on it..just a quick blurb...
I wondered if it had anything to do with this movie...
also...I wonder if Coulter herself and maybe Malkin had something to do with it...they seem the type to get a little stabby over something like this.
But the news I was watching, never followed up on it..just a quick blurb...
I wondered if it had anything to do with this movie...
also...I wonder if Coulter herself and maybe Malkin had something to do with it...they seem the type to get a little stabby over something like this.
Sorry, I've had bush fatigue since 2000. The only video I want to see of Bush is him being led away in chains as an angry mob spits on him. Other than that I never want to see or hear from him again.
92 Days!
Sorry, I learned absolutely nothing about Bush from this movie that hasn't been out in the public for at least two years. The film lacks any lacks any depth. Stone does seem to be playing this as a black comedy, but he fails miserably at doing so, rather presenting the characters as caricatures of themselves. In this sense, W. is more like an SNL skit, minus the jokes.
In short: I want my money back!
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
Yeah, it really lacks depth.
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
It's About W.
It actually makes the point that this guy lacks the depth to be a president -- which, of course, is not news.
Any of it. All of it. Nothing but bare bones. The whole story of what went on behind the scenes... Cheney, Powell, Fleischer...The impressions were good (except for Thanie Newton's Condi Rice), but the rest was The Run Up To Iraq For Dummies- Real Dummies, Made Out Of Plaster.
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
The film lacks a strong perspective or opinion. Stupor Mundi is presenteds as a man-child who, quite simply, attempts, on a grand scale, to win his father's respect. And it seems as if what Stone is trying to say is that the results can be horrible.
But the perspective is so unclear that you can see this as a case that a simple, good man might be misled by those around him. So, while I went into the theater with my own prejudices about Bush, and I think that Stone tries to make the former case, if I was one of those folks who voted for Bush twice I might see Stone making the latter case.
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
I haven't seen the film yet, so this is purely conjecture on my part. I nonetheless am left considering his other biopics, and how Stone made an attempt to be at least somewhat objective and empathetic toward his characters. It's just too easy to present Bush as a complete, utter idiot; real life is always more complicated.
A few people I know who have seen the movie have said that there were many times wherein they felt sorry for Bush - and frankly there is nothing inherently wrong with that! Bush strikes me as a simple man born into everything in his life - he inherited it all. And all the while, his father's cronies were tagging along - cooing and placating the son of the former President. Most importantly, they were running his campaign for him - using him as the vessel to get where they wanted to go. It's pathetic but also unfortunate.
Stone does present Bush as an idiot- but a well intentioned idiot.
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
For the most part, I would believe this to be true.
Individuals like Cheney and Rice are the ones you should truly worry about.
So I guess there were no scenes showing what a cruel bastard he was as a boy-- torturing small animals for his own sadistic pleasure. This little slug started out bad-- and only got worse as he got older and more power was handed over to him.--And his father was no prize either, he also got where he was because of an influencial and wealthy father who acted outside of the law.
"....using him as the vessel to get where they wanted to go. It's pathetic but also unfortunate."
Mostly it's been unfortunate for America and her citizens, especially our soldiers and their families, and the million or so Iraqi innocents who've been killed.
What's pathetic is that we now have another man running to be president who has the same character traits, for the very same reason - tryin' to prove himself to his Admiral "Big Daddy."
"Egotism is the anesthetic that dulls the pain of Stupidity" - Frank Leahy
I was equally disappointed and concur it lacks depth twice. And I had to travel to a foreign country to see it.
Hasa Diga Eebowai
In Canada?? I have a good memory...it's just short. :D
I had to cross over to the States to see it. Now it's on at the local Cineplex.
Hasa Diga Eebowai
But my kid wanted to see it, and we hadn't caught a flick in a while.
But it isn't like I went in expecting a steaming pile of whatever. Hell, I was hoping to be surprised to love it.
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
Its prob a mind blowing revealing drama, with a shock and a twist at every turn.
It might open a few peoples eyes.
they'll probably view this film as a justification rather than a scolding.
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
What's the surprise? A documentary? Facts? Reality? Give me a break. This is another faux (read "play to the emotions"), for-profit mealy depiction of a war criminal. More noise to distract the citizenry. If Stone had any credibility, Harvard, Yale or Stanford might offer him a professorship. As it is, he skates around the periphery to make sure that his codswollop brings in the slow-thinking portion of the teeming unwashed.
"Secular humanism -- a fearless, realistic world view replete with doubt and scepticism that attempts to attain an unachievable state of equilibrium between and among the human qualities of reason, intuition, imagination, memory, ethics and common sense.
a boring comic book waste of space.
The deleted opening scene should have been used rather than the short boring one.
Dylan song at the end was all wrong...the 60's are over...
This.
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
one of their songs :)
And I'm a little disappointed that someone below would suggest Green Day as anything even resembling an adequate replacement for one of the greatest singer-songwriters to ever live!
And I'm a little disappointed that someone below would suggest Green Day as anything even resembling an adequate replacement for one of the greatest singer-songwriters to ever live!
I saw this last night. It made me angry as I watched this drunken, whiny SOB act out all over the place, but it did put a few things in a new light for me. It did not really tell me anything I did not already know, but it re-shuffled the deck of what I already knew to give me a few insights. There was the inferiority complex that came from having a brilliant father -- and younger brother -- when he was just an f-up. There was a boy whose "Poppy" got him out of any and every scrape he was ever in, whether an arrest after a Princeton football game or a girlfriend's abortion. And Rove tutoring him in political nastiness, getting him to learn his lines -- almost like you or I used flash cards to memorize for a spelling bee. It made some sense of Bush's simple-minded obsession with getting Saddam. And "oil man" Cheney's role explaining to Powell that they did not HAVE an exit strategy because they were not leaving.
I'd recommend seeing it. And I'd like to hear what others thought of it.
When Chimpy is out of office and maybe indicted and facing charges.
but I wouldn't watch this movie if it was the best fucking film of the last two millennium. Having lived with Bush for far too long, fuck him, and fuck this movie.
My lines,sweetheart. But I loves me some msjoanne so all is forgiven.
Love you, too! MWAH!
Sorry I stole your lines...GMTA, and all. :-D
After suffering G W Botch, the last thing I want to do is relive any of it on film. (Ick)
duplicated...kept getting an error message
kicking and screaming. I watched most of W. peeking through my fingers like I do at horror movies. Like others, I could care less about W's Oedipus complex. What I did ultimately find fascinating was the depiction of Bush II's cabinet as a sort of Dark Camelot. They were so into themselves. I recently went to the Annie Liebovitz show at the Palace of the Legion of Honor in San Francisco. She had a gigantic print of them posed in full formal fig. I got the same creepy chills watching W. as did looking at that photo.
I enjoyed W, especially the performances.
But it left me with a nagging feeling in my Colbert region (the gut.)
It's a stretch to call Brolin's W "likable," but he's certainly affable. And it was interesting to see W. consumed by the human emotions he has failed to show us over these years: gnawing self doubt, insecurity, anxiety and feelings of inadequacy.
Ironically, this film leaves OUT what Nixon and JFK slathered on too thick, namely the sense of a sinister, democracy-destroying conspiracy at the heart of the government.
Perhaps Stone has learned something from W. Perhaps we've finally peered behind the curtain of secret government to find not a spider's nest of black operators and closet fascists, but rather a bumbling little fraternity of overachieving paranoids.
In the war room scene, Colin Powell asks "Why? Why Iraq? Why now?" Cheney responds with a characteristically megalomaniacal rant about the rise of a permanent American empire, Bush makes an impassioned plea for the righteous cause of spreading freedom and Rummy says the whole thing will take less time than a playoff season.
Had this been Nixon or JFK, no such speeches would be in the offing. W. would merely glance at a sinister Cheney would would intone ominously that the wheels of history are turning before them. Flash cut to black and white crime scene photos of Powell's body discovered floating in the Potomac.
But in W.'s world, the fake case for war is made proudly, in public, with all due disdain for any factiness that might stand in the way of truthiness.
Had Lee Harvey Oswald hired Palin's PR people, he would have claimed that the Warren Report "fully cleared him of any wrongdoing whatosever in that assassination there, you betcha."
Watching W., despite a few side references, it's easy to miss that this is the administration that authorized torture and illegal detention, that knowingly FALSIFIED (not just cherry picked, but FALSIFIED) the case for war in Iraq, that illegally wiretapped Americans, including American soldiers, including their private intimate conversations with their spouses, that illegal rendered terrorist suspects to countries that are willing to go further than waterboarding, that politicized the Justice Department and pushed phony vote fraud cases to rig elections and ensure the "permanent republican majority," that condoned and encouraged prisoner abuse and then left Lyndie England holding the bag when they were caught.
In W., these incidents are treated like just so much bureaucratic in-fighting and buck-passing, which is probably how the principals saw it.
One wonders if Stone will ever give Clay Shaw the benefit of such doubt. Maybe the JFK assassination was just a big gay misunderstanding!
Stone's W. is a honorable idiot. Looks like he got the man half-right.
Three stars.
[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an Open Thread. Site Monitor]
[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an Open Thread. Site Monitor]
[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an Open Thread. Site Monitor]
sorry
the movie was better than you thought, but it was not a good movie. There is nothing new revealed that anyone who pays attention didn't already know. The only response I had is the same one I already feel - Pathos.
The political system and "values" that the US has self=inflicted is very very broken and will not be fixed by anyone anytime soon.
Good luck, USA. You need it 'cause your god left the building a long time ago.
He always captures some reality, some truth.
But he always misses the point.
"Platoon", for example. Great cinema. Got me back into Viet Nam.
But ultimately empty.
Same with ""JFK."
Stone entertains but always misses the bulleseye.
One word review :
Whitewash.
All the talking points neatly stitched together to make it seem like they were said at the same time , multi millioniare Bush family did not have servants and lived in a regular house ?
glossed over all the bad stuff , and hammered away at the [false] good stuff.
utter horsesh*t, through and through.
When Stone said this is not a political movie , he meant it.
Attempting to rehabilitate Chimpy's image for the history books !
JFK, Platoon, Nixon, "W", etc.
"Heaven and Earth" will always be my favorite Stone movie.
I loved "Heaven and Earth" and also really liked "Born On the 4th Of July"
Radix Omnium Malorum Avaritia
I loved "Heaven and Earth" and also really liked "Born On the 4th Of July"
Radix Omnium Malorum Avaritia
guess it will be farewell Wednesday.
Something didn't end right. Didn't he conclude with
"If God's on our side, He'll stop the next war."?
If you need funds to pay for essentials, you have a revenue problem
If you need funds to pay for frivolity, you have a spending problem
[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an Open Thread. Site Monitor]
[Deleted. Off topic. Please take it to an Open Thread. Site Monitor]
on an open thread a few days ago. .....I don't care if this movie is the best ever made-I will never see it. I have made a concerted effort to not even hear his voice let alone see him because I cannot afford to replace my electronic devices. The man is a criminal. A Thug amoung a cabal of Thugs. If his 'faith'has any justice,he will rot in Hell for all eternity. And that won't be long enough for Me. 'Jesus may Love you,but I don't. GOD may forgive you but I won't. I won't even try.'
Producing a movie about a man who's inflicted more misery and huge burdens on future generations of Americans just doesn't sit right with me.
What'sa matta? Don't like monster movies?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMgS74F6k6Q
this movie blows CHUNKS!
Was Stone brave enough to show one single innocent Iraqi losing their life? Or, was it more about the lives of the famous bad people?
I went to see this with a friend on Friday night. Perhaps it was the fact that I lived through the past 8 years and didn't really want to re-live it during the start of my weekend, but I didn't think this movie was very good. Parts of it were ok, but it goes back and forth between W in his early years and his years as President. There wasn't anything that I didn't already know and I felt like I was watching a movie about the biggest loser in history.
Perhaps this movie will seem better after W is no longer President for about a decade.
"They say that Patriotism is the last refuge to which a Scoundrel clings" ~ sweetheart like you ~ bob dylan.
Hey, you and Ms Joanee are starting to sound like a broken record. LOL!
But I definitely sounded like a broken record there.
I am on Google Chrome now.
So this problem is a C&L problem, not a FF problem.
[I've been chatting with the King of All Tech Guys, and he informs me that there's a backed up router in the vicinity of LA that's been causing disruptions on the internet all day, MJ. Chalkk these dupe comments up to that issue, I guess. Just an FYI. :D Site Monitor]
This was all nothing more than a Hollyweird movie!! I must have fell asleep in the theater after eating the golden popcorn and fountain water pop! Thank God. I thought the last 8 years were real. Nice to know it was just one of those Oliver Stone fantasies.
"With God On Our Side" was first recorded in 1964 on The Times They Are A-Changin' disc.
Back then, as now, a year made a huge difference.
The version of it by the Neville Bros on "Yellow Moon" is really intense. If W's legacy can be summed up in lyric, maybe this from the same tune:
You don't count the dead when
God's on your side
So many dead, so much destroyed, and W walks away to a life of ease. Limo's, servants, 4 star food, the works. All paid for with "your money". Amazing.
this movies so bad you feel sorry for the actors that had to be in it!
too bad stone used the title "natural born killers" already because it's a more appropriate title for a movie about bushco.
Craptastic. Just craptastic!
A PG version of an NC17 man and his administration (or XXX, if you want to get down to the depravity of violence this man has lead the world to).
The vaseline-lens-treatment throughout. Really. Just really try to imagine what minute to minute existence is like for Bush and around Bush. You won't find one of those minutes in this film.
Delusional I tells ya.
Eddie Monsoon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHnJVXTS2VU
I was busy putting food on myself.
I hope you have someone to lick that food off of yourself. :D
:)
so stone did one thing right
Quite klugey.
Can't wait to see the movie, btw.
Any bio that depicts George W. Bush as a well-intentioned boob who more-or-less got bamboozled by a coven of smug, power-addicted Washinton D.C. insiders is a huge missed opportunity.
I got the impression Stone was reaching for some kind of indictment of US for putting such a man in office.
But you can't do a How In The Hell Did We Get Here? presidential bio of George W. Bush without one mention of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Fox News Channel, et al.
And in Stone's film, you'd have no idea that was the necessary soundtrack playing in the background at all times to make it so.
I saw the first showing of W. in Vancouver on Friday. It's just not very good. A lot of shallow psychologizing about Little George trying to measure up to Daddy (and Jeb), lamely written, with a whole lot of great actors doing extended SNL-style impersonations of the Bush/Cheney crew. Boring. It doesn't begin to match up to JFK or Nixon, Oliver Stone's previous prez bio-pics.
At the end, all I could think was that was the longest 2 hours I've spent in a movie theatre in years.
And that in 3 months, Bush will be on the garbage heap of history. HOORAY.
It was okay, and really good as a general bio film. However, there were a few things that bugged me:
1) They spent practically no time on the rigged elections of 2000 and 2004, save for the briefest of mentions during a dream sequence near the end.
2) The lampooning of the media lacked any subtlety whatsoever.
3) While I can understand Stone's desire to humanize Bush, perhaps make him sympathetic, Dubya has a very colorful history of sociopathy, always charging through life with no regrets and no regard for the people he's hurt. This inaccuracy, more than any other I think, watered down the film.
Even so, I found the ending incredibly poignant. No Mr. President, you will never catch that ball.
The movie is an American tragedy. With just the right amount of humor to make this depressing movie palitable. Or in other words, it would be a black comedy, if the result of said years of W in office did not result in the many deaths of both brave American soldeirs and inocent Iraq citizens. Also those citizens who survived to relocate outside of Iraq for saftey. And all of the mentaly and physically disabled people of both our military and Iraq citizens. To whom the US will be responsible for during the next three generations.
Not to mention what has been done to the economy of the United States and the world, after the Billon's spent in the Iraq war, and the billion's that have been stolen by goverment contractors, from the American tax payer.
This is a movie that needed to be made unfortuanelty.
Was Stone brave enough to show one single innocent Iraqi losing their life? Or, was it more about the lives of the famous bad people?
Was Stone brave enough to show one single innocent Iraqi losing their life? Or, was it more about the lives of the famous bad people?
.
I can't wait for the sequel...
... The Arrest of "W"
.
Starve the WAR Beast...
... Feed Americans.
http://movies-of-the-week.blogspot.com/2008/1...
I guess this won't be shown on movie night at the White House sometime soon.
in about four years, when the impeachment trials and war crimes tribunals have had their say, and after the death toll from the illegal war in Iraq is fully tabulated and the troops have all withdrawn and the total amount of $$ bush/cheney usurped to bring this unnecessary war to conclusion is revealed, they will go down in history as the worst administration EVER!''
I for one don't feel a need to see either the first nor the sequel, i've lived it for eight horrible years and can't wait for President Obama to take his rightful place and remove the neocons from power once and for all!
That has a likeness of Bush with Devil horns...
The office manager said it offended her...I rolled my eyes and said he offends me too.
But she is an old battle-axe who thinks McSpain is a god send.
Can't FRIGGIN WAIT to see this movie!
Cromwell (YouTube) was on Hannity (Morning Joe?) the other day, and I was very impressed at how decisively he shut those insolent pricks down! By the time he had finished with them, there was utter silence for a couple of seconds. His analysis of the integrity of the movie caused the neo-cons to denounce it as liberal bias, but Cromwell issued a series of irrefutable facts and, as they say, that was that.
Cromwell/Brolin '08!
..to see it, if ever. If I could make the time to waste two+ hours of my life sitting there and watching an artistic rendering of one of the most inept and bloodiest politicians in human history, I'd probably just watch Caligula for a second time.
The movie was painful to sit through. They only mentioned oil briefly as a reason for invading Iraq and didn't bring up corporate influence on politics at all. But the gorgeous (and underrated) Thandi Newton was absolutely superb as Condi Rice. Through sheer acting ability, Thandi uglified and stiffified herself into a shockingly realistic portrayal of Condi Rice, which I would not have believed to have been possible if I hadn't seen it for myself.
The movie was painful to sit through. They only mentioned oil briefly as a reason for invading Iraq and didn't bring up corporate influence on politics at all. But the gorgeous (and underrated) Thandi Newton was absolutely superb as Condi Rice. Through sheer acting ability, Thandi uglified and stiffified herself into a shockingly realistic portrayal of Condi Rice, which I would not have believed to have been possible if I hadn't seen it for myself.
The movie was painful to sit through. They only mentioned oil briefly as a reason for invading Iraq and didn't bring up corporate influence on politics at all. But the gorgeous (and underrated) Thandi Newton was absolutely superb as Condi Rice. Through sheer acting ability, Thandi uglified and stiffened herself into a shockingly realistic portrayal of Condi Rice, which I would not have believed to have been possible if I hadn't seen it for myself.
The movie was painful to sit through. They only mentioned oil briefly as a reason for invading Iraq and didn't bring up corporate influence on politics at all. But the gorgeous (and underrated) Thandi Newton was absolutely superb as Condi Rice. Through sheer acting ability, Thandi uglified and stiffened herself into a shockingly realistic portrayal of Condi Rice, which I would not have believed to have been possible if I hadn't seen it for myself.
The movie was painful to sit through. They only mentioned oil briefly as a reason for invading Iraq and didn't bring up corporate influence on politics at all. But the gorgeous (and underrated) Thandi Newton was absolutely superb as Condi Rice. Through sheer acting ability, Thandi uglified and stiffened herself into a shockingly realistic portrayal of Condi Rice, which I would not have believed to have been possible if I hadn't seen it for myself.
Comments are closed on this entry