AFL/CIO's Rich Trumka Speaks Out For the Strengthen Social Security Coalition
Rich Trumka, the current president of the AFL/CIO, has been fighting to protect Social Security for a very long time. (Take a look at this video from 1994, when he asks, "Where is the crisis?" and points out that Social Security is the target of "draconian" proposals while it was in surplus.)
He is one of a very few voices standing up for working people in this country, and here's the speech he made this week at the National Press Club for the press conference announcing the Strengthen Social Security coalition:
Good morning. Working people around the country know the value of Social Security, and the Labor Movement has long been one of its staunchest supporters.
The American Federation of Labor was there in 1935, advocating for passage of the Social Security Act. In the decades following, the AFL-CIO played a lead role in designing the evolving Social Security system -- supporting efforts to strengthen and broaden the program, and opposing weakening of its protections. During the last Administration, we were key to defeating privatization.
In a misplaced effort to reduce the deficit, Social Security is under attack again --this time by proposals to raise the retirement age. And the right wing spin machine has convinced many Americans that Social Security won’t be there for them, anyway.
Working America, the community affiliate of the AFL-CIO, goes door to door every night talking to thousands of people a week. What they hear is that working families -- including young people -- are deeply worried about their retirement security. They are hearing that their Social Security benefits may be cut --- and they don’t see how they can possibly make up the difference.
At a time when retirement is less secure for working Americans than it has been in many generations, only Social Security remains a defined and stable retirement benefit -- not to mention the important family protections it provides when a worker is injured or dies. Unions know exactly what is happening to retirement income in this country because we see it at the bargaining table. Fewer traditional pensions. More riskier 401(k) plans -- not a great benefit for workers with stagnant incomes who find it difficult or impossible to save. Now is the time, to strengthen, not weaken, Social Security.
Raising the eligibility age for a full Social Security benefit would be disastrous for millions of Americans. It is a benefit cut, plain and simple. It is a cut that is unnecessary and one that Americans can ill-afford.
For those born in 1960 or later, the retirement age for a full Social Security benefit is now 67, rather than 65. These younger workers have already been hit with a 13 percent benefit cut -- and some now want to impose another cut on top of that.
A 62-year old worker who would receive $800 a month if the retirement age for a full benefit were 65, will get only $700 a month when that retirement age becomes 67.
Further increasing the retirement age for a full benefit to 69 (and some are even saying 70) means another 13% cut in benefits -- for a total benefit cut of more than 25% for anyone who is now 50 or younger. That probably includes many of you in this room.An age increase is a particular hardship for workers in physically demanding jobs who don’t qualify for disability -- workers like my father who spent his life in the mines and couldn’t work another day by the time he qualified for Social Security -- and those older workers who may no longer be able to find work due to age discrimination.
I know that America can do better than this. And that’s why the AFL-CIO, as part of a broad campaign, is mobilizing to protect Social Security. I look forward to working with our many coalition partners to create a secure retirement for our baby boomers, our children, and grandchildren.
Thank you.

Top 5 Social Security Myths
http://pol.moveon.org/ssmyths/?id=22140-40950...
I guess your membership shouldn't have voted for Reagan back in the '80s.
USA! USA! USA!
"If things don't change, they'll probably remain the same."
than Social Security (or our equivalent up here Social Insurance) and it must be preserved at all costs. That being said it is not without problems. The nice thing about it is that the problems are rather like an inbound asteroid poised to strike the earth. A little nudge in the right direction when it is far distant solves the problem far more efficiently than waiting until it looms before you. There are demographic problems, owing to bulges in age distribution. Don't blame the boomers for that one, blame their horny parents. That one could be addressed through immigration (which is one of the things we've done). Can you say undocumented alien amnesty? Another problem may be a slight underfunding. A slight increase in taxes and removing the FICA cap makes that one go away. The most difficult one to solve is the rising life expectancy. If health reforms ultimately bring the average life expectancy in the US to where it should be, equal to the rest of the industrialized world, then claims will dramatically increase in duration and that is where the difficult devil lives. Some people want to raise the age for claimants still further but I doubt the average worker could do it. That problem may call for even greater increase in taxes. If that's what it takes I'd do it. One other tip: don't let the Republicans run your economy. They have an unfortunate tendency to drive it into the ditch and every time that happens it reduces the money flowing into SS and makes the problems worse.
Never attribute to malice...
Regarding: "The most difficult one to solve is the rising life expectancy."
According to MoveOn.org:
In any case, our increased levels of obesity probably soon will prevent us from gaining much life expectancy. I say that seriously.
I said that, "if" health care reform produces longer life expectancies. There is a reason people live longer elsewhere and health care is one of the most important factors in achieving longer life spans. Improved health care is going to have the most dramatic effects on which segment of the population? The wealthy? I think not.
Never attribute to malice...
There's one sure-fire way to prove that Social Security is fully funded. The Republicans keep trying to "fix" it. If it was truly broke, they wouldn't give two shits.
I will be 68 in 2 months, and I was laid off from my administrative assistant job at a steel mill in January of 2009. Thousands of applications & resume sendings later, I am STILL unemployed and have only about a dozen face to face interviews. Now, I don't look my age, but I do look around 60, no wrinkles, healthy, fashionably dressed, up-to-date, personable, hard working--do you think anyone will hire me? Hell, no. Just imagine millions more my age who need to work to support themselves flooding the workplace because they need to keep working until 70 and NOBODY will hire them because they're over 50. How do you think THAT'S gonna affect the economy? More suicides, more homeless seniors....trust me, $800-$1000 a month social security will not pay the bills for those people who have not been lucky enough to have jobs with retirement or 401K plans. Stupid plan.
"In a misplaced effort to reduce the deficit, Social Security is under attack again --this time by proposals to raise the retirement age."
Yes it is, and the Democrats control congress and the White House! Obama has his cat food comission, another of his nauseating, assinine, pointlessly appeasing sell-outs to the GOP, busily working on this attack of Social Security.
God damn him and the rest of the gutless, quisling frauds who now control the Democratic Party.
If you don't like or want Social Security...Don't cash the damn checks!! SIMPLE...send them back, or give them to charity, or how bout if you and your family make a million dollars or more a year...you don't pay into the system, or get anything out after you turn 62?.....and BTW assholes... it is OUR money!!!..I've been putting money in for years..and YES I'm entitled to it!!! So don't act like ENTITLEMENTS is a nasty word...because it's not.
Also, insurers in America put the average death of males at 74......So what a great idea to make people work til they're 70...the right sure have a need to completely make the majority of the people in America, serfs...don't they? Not here, and not now assholes....
Neo-Conservatism is a cancer that must be destroyed...They practice misanthropy against anyone who is a different color or who is in need of some kind....they are the most Un-Christian variety of people I've ever seen, even though they claim Jesus as "theirs"..what ass soup these people are...
The attack on Social Security is another battle that needs to be fought back. I'll bet if they ask the Teabaggers about it, they will want the Repugs to leave it alone, especially since most teabaggers are on Social Security.
HELL NO!
DO THE OPPOSITE! lower instead of raise the age!
Make retirement at age 50-55....this would get 10-20% of the workforce out of the workforce early and let all the unemployed take those jobs!!!
Obama and the Cat Food Commission are coming to steal our money.. and they will get it if we let them.
If Social Security is so broken.. how come they are dying to get their hands on it?
I LOVE this man.
*
Comments are restricted to registered users only.
Login - Register