At Harvard, Some Students Are Taking an M.B.A. Honor Oath
It's getting even more difficult to find good news these days, but I thought this was worth a mention. I don't know how much of a difference it will make, but I hope it does. Businesses would do well to seek out those graduates and hire them:
When a new crop of future business leaders graduates from the Harvard Business School next week, many of them will be taking a new oath that says, in effect, greed is not good.
Nearly 20 percent of the graduating class have signed “The M.B.A. Oath,” a voluntary student-led pledge that the goal of a business manager is to “serve the greater good.” It promises that Harvard M.B.A.’s will act responsibly, ethically and refrain from advancing their “own narrow ambitions” at the expense of others.
Only 20 percent? Oh well, at least 1 in 5 has scruples!
What happened to making money?
That, of course, is still at the heart of the Harvard curriculum. But at Harvard and other top business schools, there has been an explosion of interest in ethics courses and in student activities — clubs, lectures, conferences — about personal and corporate responsibility and on how to view business as more than a money-making enterprise, but part of a large social community.
“We want to stand up and recite something out loud with our class,” said Teal Carlock, who is graduating from Harvard and has accepted a job at Genentech. “Fingers are now pointed at M.B.A.’s and we, as a class, have a real opportunity to come together and set a standard as business leaders.”
At Columbia Business School, all students must pledge to an honor code: “As a lifelong member of the Columbia Business School community, I adhere to the principles of truth, integrity, and respect. I will not lie, cheat, steal, or tolerate those who do.” The code has been in place for about three years and came about after discussions between students and faculty.
In the post-Enron and post-Madoff era, the issue of ethics and corporate social responsibility has taken on greater urgency among students about to graduate. While this might easily be dismissed as a passing fancy — or simply a defensive reaction to the current business environment — business school professors say that is not the case. Rather, they say, they are seeing a generational shift away from viewing an M.B.A. as simply an on-ramp to the road to riches.
Those graduating today, they say, are far more concerned about how corporations affect the community, the lives of its workers and the environment. And business schools are responding with more courses, new centers specializing in business ethics and, in the case of Harvard, student-lead efforts to bring about a professional code of conduct for M.B.A.’s, not unlike oaths that are taken by lawyers and doctors.
“I don’t see this as something that will fade away,” said Diana C. Robertson, a professor of business ethics at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. “It’s coming from the students. I don’t know that we’ve seen such a surge in this activism since the 1960s. This activism is different, but, like that time, it is student-driven.”
It's kind of ironic, in light of Harvard's present financial crisis.
It sounds good, but the shareholders will demand attention to the bottom line.
statusquObama, change you can only pretend in
Hell, once they're out the door and away from the People's Republic they'll probably forget they ever took any pledge except the one to make lots of $$$$$.
And as for Harvard's "financial crisis" - it is entirely due to a Massachusetts law that limits how much they can dip into their gigantic endowment annually. Many other schools in the Commonwealth are having the same problem. Brandeis has had to resort to auctioning off stuff to pay their bills.
on their student loans for doing so...
"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."
---Southwest Airlines
One in five of the general population wouldn't be that bad; but one in five at Harvard is great. If 1 in 5 at Harvard are interested in "serving the greater good", there may be some hope yet.
There are companies out there that do care about more than max profit. I'm not saying that they're saints - everyone has their skeletons, their labor problems, environmental problems, whatever it may be. But there are some out there who pay their employees a decent wage even though they could cut it, companies who have philanthropic foundations even though they don't need the image boost that much, etc.
Sad that it isn't more.
basically hilarious, they should take the oath coming in not going out, the damage is already done.
Maybe now business people will be able to join the ethical ranks of those other oath takers and paragons of goodness- like police, journalists and plastic surgeons, har!
I do think that this is a great idea- if a small start. The real change must come with the basic structure of big biz and finance tho- along the lines of changing who benefits from a corporation. As it stands customers come in 3rd or 4th, after CEOs and StockHolders. The greater community/society aren't even blips on the radar.
And they will NEVER get hired in any corporation in America.
Will undoubtedly follow the buzz of TQM.
because Dubya had a Harvard MBA. ;o}
I pledge allegiance to the Constitution of the United States of America, and to the republic which it established, one nation from many peoples, promising liberty and justice for all
When you manage so much money, ethics simply cannot be part of the equation.
Make companies smaller, regional, better yet local, and you will see a return of ethics.
Talk about "legislating from the bench" ..
After Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company corporations have assumed to have the rights guaranteed to real live persons in the US Constitution.
States MUST begin to limit the power of the Corporations as they were before 1886.
Democracy is too important to be entrusted to politicians.
Rise Up!
Protest!
Easy to say but when working the way up the corporate ladder, reality tends to change starry eyed idealism into pragmatic cannibalism.
The system only rewards they who will do anything to increase market value.
Like MM23 says, the whole concept of what defines a corporate charter needs to be redefined.
Sure, I'll put that Oath on the shelf right next to my Purity Ball ring (a little tarnished but hey, I was drunk), my Captain Planet Planeteer membership (don't tell my boss at Exxon about it), and my D.A.R.E. plaque that I used in my coke trial defense.
I have many friends who are engineers who have/wear a steel ring to remind them of their responsibility to the public. It would be nice for business schools, at both the undergraduate and graduate levels, to introduce a similar ritual.
http://www.order-of-the-engineer.org/e-ring.htm
Not to go to a school run by misogynists?
What are you referring to, Tequila?
I've never seen change without a fire
accomplish much, but if does, then yay!
I've never seen change without a fire
I am cynical
doctors take oaths and they choose their profits and protecting themselves regularly instead of acting in the patients interest and "first doing no harm"
and the same is true of presidents taking an oath to uphold the constitution, who then wipes his ass on it for 8 years.
I am 'lucky' enough to have run across many doctors who are very very serious about their oaths.
Your gross generalisation is an insult to my current neighbour, a 3rd year resident who just cycled out of the area's trauma center and ER to the VA hospital, and who made a point of making sure that I was ok after a health crisis this week, and let me know he was available any time day or night if I needed him. His wife laughed and said "Not that you are ever home!" He leaves in a month to work a year outside of Boise, in a rural medicine setting. It is a program several of my neighbours have gone through. It's a public medicine specialty, actually. Which means they are hardly in it for the bucks.
Go ahead, be cynical. It's on you. I am actually heartened that MBAs are looking at themselves. Maybe only a few of them will take the oath seriously at first, but if it catches on, the peer pressure will be to be ethical, not make more money in a day than Christ could if he were selling miracles.
me-oww!
If it is contagious, it deserves applause and support. Greed has all but shattered the global economy. If some future business people decide to be honest and trustworthy, then it's time to salute them. Well done.
Is this will be about as good as teens taking an othe to not have sex.
I think the palins can see how well that went!
republicanism is a mental illness!
i believe that he did. when i found out that they let his sack of shite bu$h ass in because his daddy ran the CIA, i lost any respect for them.
i notice that they do not put him on any of their advertisements. just like florida state and ted bundy.
Business school is for idiot sons and grasping proles. Back then, most people knew that. Today, the knowledge is somewhat rarer.
Sorry, I think I'm gonna pass on this one. I seriously doubt that I could ever choke it down.
I figured it would be 35-40%, but oh well. Too much hope on my part.
was changed and hand written in, as his pilot pass grade in the ANG was !?
It does seem a bit odd that the junior flyboy got the original score blacked out, and somebody wrote down 25% or whatever, the absolute minimal needed to qualify as a ANG pilot.
... the pain and misery unleashed on us poor saps by your hordes of MBAs can be fixed doing the adult equivalent of "pinky swear" for 5 seconds.
I don't care what Harvard grads say or swear... I am more concerned about what they DO.
they get their first fucking brooks bros. account.
Some stuff you can't make up!
MBA's promising to care about the greater good. I will be outright with this...I loathe business majors. I really do. The only reason they chose business over economics was because they wanted more money and didn't want to deal with the difficult socio-economic conundrums. Ask any business major or any person getting an MBA why they are in that field, the majority will reply, "To get that money!" So, to me this "oath" means nothing. A majority of business majors and people working in management of corporations actually have to take business ethics classes. Furthermore, many corporations and businesses have Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) requirements. Let's see how well those two things have worked at stemming the tide of greed and unethical business practice in the past few years? Yeah, not so well. Until these people's actions match their words, I won't even take this oath seriously.
*I don't like to generalize to such an extent, and I am sure there are some great, ethical people with MBAs who truly do care about their community. I just haven't met those people as of yet in my short lifetime.
Considering corporations are sociopathic by their conception and obligation to share holders, I assume the 20% are going into non-profits?
They must have a good program.
Harvard MBAs have been shown to be a net drag on the bottom line for businesses that hire them. That's because they are a high-priced bauble, not really anything special.
Besides, the whole underlying concept of the MBA is fatally and irretrievably flawed. It is based on the idea that management is a portable skiill. This is obviously false -- in order to manage an organization effectively, you have to be deeply familiar with what that operation does. Hiring a guy who used to run a big box store to run a car company is a disaster.
Greedy Reslugs would never sign anything that they would promise NOT to criminally screw people out of their hard earned money.
This pledge is about as meaningfull as a virginity oath. It could be that some of them didn't sign it because it's dumb.
Comments are closed on this entry