Go Home

Because I live in a city (the unhip part), I actually know people who occasionally use payday lenders. And while the industry is ripe for all kinds of abuse, the people who use these lenders conscientiously (the ones who don't roll over the loan, thus incurring obscene amounts of interest) insist they want that option -- because it's still cheaper than going to the loan sharks.

However, the number of people who do roll over those loans is great enough that the payday lending industry needs to be very tightly regulated. The industry knows that; that's why they pour so much money into campaign coffers. But there's simply no question that the interest rates are usurious and this is exactly the sort of thing Democrats have been fighting to change. Not a good place for "bipartisan" compromise! From the NY Times Dealbook:

Senator Bob Corker, the Tennessee Republican who is playing a crucial role in bipartisan negotiations over financial regulation, pressed to remove a provision from draft legislation that would have empowered federal authorities to crack down on payday lenders, people involved in the talks said. The industry is politically influential in his home state and a significant contributor to his campaigns, records show.

The Senate Banking Committee’s chairman, Christopher J. Dodd, Democrat of Connecticut, proposed legislation in November that would give a new consumer protection agency the power to write and enforce rules governing payday lenders, debt collectors and other financial companies that are not part of banks, Sewell Chan reports in The New York Times.

Late last month, Mr. Corker pressed Mr. Dodd to scale back substantially the power that the consumer protection agency would have over such companies, according to three people involved in the talks.

Mr. Dodd went along, these people said, in an effort to reach a bipartisan deal with Mr. Corker after talks had broken down between Democrats and the committee’s top Republican, Senator Richard C. Shelby of Alabama. The individuals, both Democrats and Republicans, spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the negotiations.

Under the proposal agreed to by Mr. Dodd and Mr. Corker, the new consumer agency could write rules for nonbank financial companies like payday lenders. It could enforce such rules against nonbank mortgage companies, mainly loan originators or servicers, but it would have to petition a body of regulators for authority over payday lenders and other nonbank financial companies.

Consumer advocates said that writing rules without the inherent power to enforce them would leave the agency toothless.

Share This Post

Link To This Post


27 Comments
glogrrl's picture

Exactly like the country will be once the Rethuglicans get back in power and strip what few remaining regulations there are to protect the ordinary American. What a country!


“The greatest evildoers are those who don’t remember because they have never given thought to the matter, and, without remembrance, nothing can hold them back,”

Peter G's picture

that depends a good deal on who is appointing the regulators would it not? The same shit is going on up here but unfortunately, due to Canadian constitutional issues, it's on a province by province basis.


Hasa Diga Eebowai

needy in favor of the corporations. This is NOT REGULATION BUT CORPORATE GIVEAWAYS AGAIN>..Call the fools..1.800.828.0498 or 1.866.411.3405

Big banks have -under other names- gone into this business on the borders and in S California...Wells Fargo is on along with there $$$ transfers to South America.

BlueSam's picture

If you can't get a checking account, you deserve to use payday lenders.

How's my Corker/Dodd imitation so far?

Different Anonymous's picture
.

-- because it's still cheaper than going to the loan sharks.

So, we've become a country that can compare it's "regulated" banks with loan sharks.

Yippee!

Old Billy's picture

Bob Corker has no shame. Yay bipartisanship!!!

and his connections to the industry. Unfortunately, due to the anonymity of their sources, and the absence of any language in the deal, such as who the "body of regulators" is which would have to be petitioned to start rule enforcement, we simply have to take the word of anonymous "consumer advocates" that the deal would render the agency toothless. Curently both federal regulation and the agency are non excistent.


"I mean Romney is the most conservative on illegal immigration and I don't think Ronald Reagan could get elected in California today."
Ann "Clipped" Coulter

Ah, Michael Corleone would be so proud.

“..in five years, the Corleone Family is going to be completely legitimate. Trust me.”

It took longer, but everything the heads of the five families were into is now legitimate. No, they didn’t change their way of “doing business”, nor did they stop making offers no one could refuse. They just made everything they did legal.

Gambling? How much do you think is spent advertising power ball?
Loan sharking? The sign out front says “Payday Loan” – now it’s ok.
Drugs? The pharmaceutical companies spend 100s of millions telling you how much you need them.
Prostitution? Well, perhaps not with overt sex, but have you ever been to K-Street?

Completely legitimate. Way to go Mikey (we’re all proud of ya)!

photon_s feather's picture

How about in Nevada, where gambling beyond lotteries is also legal?

I thought that's where the 'families' went for legal venues.

others?
republicanism/conservatism is a mental illness it has killed the economy, almost the country and ruined millions of lives!

MountainMan23's picture

Big Banks borrow at about zero percent and charge credit card customers 20% and more.

The mob has already taken over.

Why shouldn't Predatory PayDay Lenders get their piece of the action?


Democracy is too important to be entrusted to politicians.
Rise Up!
Protest!

Trittydi's picture

I'm completely disgusted. I want my country back.
*

good friend Joe Leiberman. That's the way to stand up for good democratic values. I mean we wouldn't want to pass reform if it would upset our republican colleagues, would we?

savannah43's picture

corporate owners.

What did the working stiff ever do to the GOPers to deserve such relentless, single-minded abuse?

BlueSam's picture

that is all.

Tombo's picture

People were wondering if Dodd would go out swinging for the people or for his corporate paymasters. Well, that's been answered.

He's added a dose of sucking off GOP Senators as the icing on his "go fuck yourself" to the public cake.

And the rest of the Senate Democrats will act as though this is at worst an unfortunate but neccessary compromise instead of the corrupt prostituing of his office that it really is. They are sickening.

The Senate Democrats just keep getting lower and lower.

madmatt's picture

what a scumbag, a mobster who tried doing that would be in jail on RICO charges, but they are corkers best friends!

littlepitcher's picture

Corker opposes a crackdown on payday lending because his buddies (and reputedly, Wright/Mills relatives) can utilize payday loans at exorbitant interest, compounded usuriously, to file liens on low-end properties, foreclose them, and then rent them back to low-paid workers.
He'll do the same with title lenders, so his uncaught Joe Prebul clones can confiscate poor folks' cars.

mcnairbo's picture

Dodd is just laying the groundwork for a cushy, high salaried job with these institutions he's siding against the American people with. Just get out already Dodd!

ghostrider's picture

Looks like the bi-partisan screwing of Americans fell through at least on this bill.

WASHINGTON AP) – Unable to muster bipartisan agreement on key banking provisions, Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd said Thursday he will offer his own version of a sweeping overhaul of financial regulations without Republican support.

A month of talks between Dodd and Republican Sen. Bob Corker found some common ground but failed to yield agreement on consumer protections and other sticking points.

"Together we have made significant progress and resolved many of the items, but a few outstanding issues remain," Dodd said in a statement. Dodd said he still aimed to get a consensus bill, but said time was running out.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/11/dodd...

jimbo92107's picture

Then it appears he is feathering his retirement bed with money from the worst crooks in America.

ricky's picture

Dodd is chair of a committee tryiong to get a financial regulations bill out of committee, to the floor, and passed with 60 votes.

The bill has enormously important provisions. One provision, the importance of which in the overall scheme of things is debatable, applies regulations to a previously unregulated sliver of "banking," the paycheck loan folks who are a step above pawn shops. Dodd agrees to weaken proposed regulations (if this story is to be believed) on this industry.

Therefore you conclude he appears to be on the take.

dumbo6345789


"I mean Romney is the most conservative on illegal immigration and I don't think Ronald Reagan could get elected in California today."
Ann "Clipped" Coulter

Huh?

They are loan sharks.

Maybe they're just Mako sharks when compared to the illegal Great Whites, but they're still sharks.

Limp-Dick Blimpaugh's picture

Why do the Dem's even bother to talk with the Reslugs, that love deregulation and won't crack down on any company that rips off Americans.

A type of loan especially used in limited partnership agreements is the recourse note.

card merchant services

Comments are closed on this entry