TOPICS

Sestak Legislation Would Extend COBRA Coverage, Subsidies

Good for Joe Sestak for recognizing the problem. Let your congress person know you support the bill, even if you can't afford COBRA yourself. Keeping health coverage on the political radar is an important step towards affordable universal health care:

Laura C. Trueman has spent much of her career promoting affordable health care. Now, she wishes she could find some herself.

Laid off from her marketing job at a managed-care company late last year, Trueman was able to keep her health insurance thanks to a provision in the federal stimulus bill that gave furloughed workers the right to purchase their old employer-based coverage at a 65% discount. The subsidies, which last up to nine months, were designed to give workers like Trueman time to get back on their feet.

Today, with the job market weak, Trueman is still without a job, and her family is bracing for an uncertain future. With the subsidies, she and her husband, a self-employed attorney were paying a manageable $460 a month for their health insurance; starting Dec. 1, the cost jumps to $1,313. They can ill afford the increase. They're already having trouble making their mortgage payment, and fear they might lose their Northern Virginia home.

“It has really made a huge difference for us,” she says of the insurance assistance, adding that the higher payment “would be a real stretch.”

Since 1985, a law known as COBRA has given laid off-workers the right to hold onto their employer-based health insurance for up to 18 months so long as they continue to pay the premiums, including payments that their employers used to make on their behalf.

In the past very few people could afford this option, but the government subsidies have changed that, and now enrollments appear to be growing sharply. Hewitt Associates, a Lincolnshire, Ill., consulting firm, recently estimated that the rate at which workers were opting for coverage under COBRA had doubled compared with pre-subsidy levels.

Although federal officials do not have figures on the number of people participating in the program, millions have been eligible. The law covers anyone laid off between Sept. 1 of last year and Dec. 31 of this year.

But with the first discounts having gone into effect March 1, many people are about to see the benefit expire, including many who remain unemployed. The Obama administration and some members of Congress are talking about whether to extend the subsidy. Some lawmakers aren't enthused because of budget concerns, but backers say the subsidy is a crucial lifeline for people still hunting for jobs.

Just this week, Rep. Joe Sestak, D-Penn., introduced legislation that would extend from 9 to 15 months the total allowable time an unemployed worker and her family could receive the subsidized COBRA assistance. The legislation would also extend the subsidies to people laid off through June 30, 2010, widening the window of eligibility by six months. A third provision would give an extra six months of undiscounted COBRA coverage to people who were laid off early in 2008 before the subsidy law took effect.

I was laid off in July 2007, just before the subsidies kicked in. But at this point, I'd be happy just to be eligible for another six months.



Login or Register to post comments.

16 comments

Well the COBRA Commander isn't going to take this new sitting down.

This is a good step. But not the solution. If we don't pass HCR, we're going to have to take a page from the Babe Ruth method of healing one sick kid at at time:

Hail Mary Pass

(satire)

so they might want to do something

http://rawstory.com/2009/11/reid-tune-passing...

Makes sense as a good step. Now we need more steps.

It shouldn't be so hard to help people laid off or unemployed. It''s like pulling teeth with some of these pols.

UGH!

to chase everyone back to work and to keep you from quitting shitty jobs, don't kid yourself

i volunteer to help pull their teeth *opens and closes pliers*

With a modern universal health care system, SCHIP, COBRA, and Medicaid expansions are irrelevant.

But they do allow Dems to claim they're doing something while simultaneously selling us out.

We are a prosperous nation, with a growing economy
We are a prosperous nation, with a growing economy
We are a prosperous nation, with a growing economy
We are a prosperous nation, with a growing economy
We are a prosperous nation, with a growing economy
We are a prosperous nation, with a growing economy
We are a prosperous nation, with a growing economy

And unlimited potential

Keep repeating

The COBRA subsidy made a big difference to me, personally. Usually at the end of a project, I'm laid off and offered COBRA, but it's ridiculously expensive -- usually around $800/month, which is nearly as much as my other monthly expenses combined.

I usually just buckle down and tell myself, "okay, just don't get sick until you find work again."

This time, it's around $100./month -- I was able to afford it without draining my savings dry, and it made a big difference when I got sick several weeks ago. Multiple office visits, diagnostics, and prescriptions add up quickly when you're unemployed.

Of course, as others point out, if we get a decent health care program from this legislation, the need for the subsidy goes away -- but I was very, very happy to have it this time.

HCR: $90B a year - Republicans and some Dems go "fiscal conservative" crazy of it
Defense Appropriations Bill - $628B for one year.

[Comment Deleted By Administration For Violation Of Terms Of Service]

n/t

...wow

Aside from cost, the problem with COBRA is... it assumes you HAD health insurance at the last full-time job you were laid off from. How many biz owners are dropping health insurance in the first place?

For many, COBRA is a dream even before it becomes unaffordable, or even subsidized.

and get laid off aren't always eligible for Cobra either. I carried the health insurance for my husband and I but lost it when I lost my job. Because of the fact that I had other insurance "available" to me through his job, I did not qualify for Cobra. Never mind that his company's insurance cost 3 times what the subsidized Cobra would've cost us and the fact that it's unaffordable was the reason I worked a full time job in the first place...it was available, making me ineligible. I don't think a lot of people realize this.

My family desperately is hoping that they continue the subsidy. If they don't we will be in trouble. I am disabled but do not yet qualify for gov't benefits and may never. I am only 35. In March my husband lost his job. I had to go on COBRA in May. I take many medications one of which the generic would cost over $500 a month out of pocket. I cannot go without coverage. if we have to pay full price for the coverage it will be $600 a month, currently it is just under $200. This is for me only. He is healthy as a horse so we opted not to cover him. Our son we pay thru the state. If we loose the subsidy we cannot afford my medicine copays as they are another $300 a month. There are no programs to assist us. His new job pays too well. But it doesn't have benefits. Everyone asks why he took a job without benefits, it was the only job he could find, we had to move 1300 miles for that position after months of looking. The cost of living is much higher but there was no work in Florida at all. So we are stuck in a loosing battle. WE NEED this subsidy to continue.

16 comments

Login or Register to post comments.