Read time: 2 minutes

Wanna Know Why Congress Doesn't Care About The 99 Percent? Because They're The 1 Percent.

Mr. Smith Goes To Washington - 1939 The days of Sen. Jefferson Smith are sadly over. Congress is no longer the vehicle for idealistic young politicians eager to make a meaningful change. It's now designed to protect the status quo: districts


Mr. Smith Goes To Washington - 1939

The days of Sen. Jefferson Smith are sadly over. Congress is no longer the vehicle for idealistic young politicians eager to make a meaningful change. It's now designed to protect the status quo: districts are drawn to protect parties; campaigns require a ridiculous amount of money so that it becomes impossible for anyone without a whole lot of cash to even launch a credible campaign.

It wasn't always that way. We've had politicians from modest circumstances. They understood the concerns of every day Americans. But while we've seen the wealth of most Americans go down in the last twenty five years, the wealth of members of Congress has gone way, way up:

Between 1984 and 2009, the median net worth of a member of the House more than doubled, according to the analysis of financial disclosures, from $280,000 to $725,000 in inflation-adjusted 2009 dollars, excluding home ­equity.

Over the same period, the wealth of an American family has declined slightly, with the comparable median figure sliding from $20,600 to $20,500, according to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics from the University of Michigan.

The comparisons exclude home equity because it is not included in congressional reporting, and 1984 was chosen because it is the earliest year for which consistent wealth statistics are available.

The growing disparity between the representatives and the represented means that there is a greater distance between the economic experience of Americans and those of lawmakers.

Unsurprisingly, this income disparity has resulted in greater and greater polarization in voting as well:

congresswealth-graphicstory.jpg

Thus, we're looking at a congress that are less our elected representatives and more representative of the one percent. This is why cutting social safety programs make sense...they can't imagine anyone like them actually needing them.

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

More C&L Coverage

Discussion

New Commenting System

Our comments are now powered by Insticator. In order to comment you will need to create an Insticator account. The process is quick and simple. Please note that the ability to comment with a C&L site account is no longer available.

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service (revised 3/17/2016) for information on our posting policy.

Please Do Not Use the Login Link at the Top of the Site.

In order to comment you must use an Insticator account. To register an account, enter your comment and click the post button. A dialog will then appear allowing you create your account.

We will be retiring our Crooks and Liars user account system in January, 2021.

Thank you.
C&L Team