New York not worth Protecting
"New York has no national monuments or icons, according to the Department of Homeland Security form obtained by ABC News. (Click here for the actual document.) That was a key factor used to determine that New York City should have its anti-terror funds slashed by 40 percent--from $207.5 million in 2005 to $124.4 million in 2006. The formula did not consider as landmarks or icons: The Empire State Building, The United Nations, The Statue of Liberty and others found on several terror target hit lists. It also left off notable landmarks, such as the New York Public Library, Times Square, City Hall and at least three of the nation's most renowned museums: The Guggenheim, The Metropolitan and The Museum of Natural History...read on"
I thought New York was the central front of the war on terror. Just ask The Cowardly Lion
Hugh Hewitt interviewing Michael Ware:
MW: Let's look at it this way. I mean, you're sitting back in a comfortable radio studio, far from the realities of this war.
HH: Actually, Michael, let me interrupt you.
MW: If anyone has a right...
HH: Michael, one second.
MW: If anyone has a right to complain, that's what...
HH: I'm sitting in the Empire State Building. Michael, I'm sitting in the Empire State Building, which has been in the past, and could be again, a target. Because in downtown Manhattan, it's not comfortable, although it's a lot safer than where you are, people always are three miles away from where the jihadis last spoke in America. So that's...civilians have a stake in this. Although you are on the front line, this was the front line four and a half years ago."
This is a sad response by the DHS. Why do they hate America?
More like this
- echidne of the snakes
- Bob Cesca
- Juan Cole/Informed Comment
- Mugsy's Rap Shet
- daily howler
- Blue Gal
- Lawyers, Guns & Money
- Daily Kos
- left coaster
- Politics TV
- The Reality-Based Community
- The Immoral Minority (Alaska)
- Ezra Klein
- bart cop