New Greenwald Video: Fox Attacks! Iran

 

Another great video from Robert Greenwald and Brave New Films showing how FOX Opinion has been drumming up the propaganda in support for a U.S. invasion of Iran.Robert Greenwald:

I remember very clearly the daily fearmongering led by FOX as they cheered for war with Iraq. The 24/7 images, sound effects, yelling and threatening were an ever-present drumbeat for war. We had to invade, and we had to invade now.. anyone who didn't see that was a traitor. They viciously attacked those of us who worked to get out the truth.

You'd think that with the complete failure in Iraq, those days would be behind us. Sadly, you'd be wrong.

FOX wants war with Iran.

Tags: Iran


Login or Register to post comments.

52 comments

Sign the letter to the networks!!

http://foxattacks.com/iran

This piece really tells the story of what a corrupt tool for propaganda Fox is. It also should tell people that our battle lines do not end with Bush and other Republicans. Christiane Amanpour’s comment succinctly describes the real threat:

“My station [CNN] was intimidated by the administration and the foot soldiers at Fox News.”

The media is manufacturing fear and misleading the country and the world. And it all begins with Fox. We must resolve to stop being accomplices in our own downfall...

Detox from Fox: Starve The Beast

Appearing on Fox is not only pointless, it is overtly harmful to progressive causes. It is long past time for Democrats and progressives to recognize this simple fact and resolve to stop allowing themselves to be used for target practice by disingenuous pseudo-journalists whose purpose is to defame and defeat them in politics and public opinion.

No more capitulation by our representatives and Fox’s competitors. It cannot, and must not, be tolerated. Do not cooperate with Fox in any way. Just say no!

If Fox News wants to attack Iran, they should attack Iran.

I still can't believe an angry mob hasn't stormed into the FOX building yet.

FOX "news" = GOP = corporate fascists & the handful of super-rich elites running this country.

Chris from Ohio @ 4:

I still can't believe an angry mob hasn't stormed into the FOX building yet.

I've got a pitch fork. Where do I sign up?

I can't believe the madness. You are right, no one should go on Fox. The only reason Senator Dodd was even allowed to TALK was because he was a senator.
I couldn't even listen to the video, I am so discouraged.

Remind me again who is the terrorist state:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655

Aaah, gotta love the short term memory of most Americans, only rivaled by gold fish in its shortness...

GOP: Greedy Obsolete Parasites

why don't we go to war with fox?
they are definitely a suitable target for their anti-American
lies.

"FOX wants war with Iran"

But who at FOX will go to the front lines to fight once it's started?

can someone outline how it is a television station "wants" war with Iran?

can someone outline how (in detail) the propaganda flows from, I'm assuming Neo-cons/defense dpt/administration to Fox?

can someone point to names at this company who benefit from this kind of programming?

I clearly see that it is a warmongering viewpoint. I just wonder how it all works. Links, descriptions, accounts would be greatly appreciated.

cheers

#8-

The link you provided simply provides more evidence why those in the United States government should not be exempt from being tried in the International Criminal Court. 66 children, among others, died in that plane attack and not one person in the United States, to the best of my knowledge, has been ever been held accountable for the unnecessary deaths of those people that were shot down by the U.S. military.

Any bets on what the next false flag faked terror incident will be?
will it be...

a.) Iran captures a patrol boat full of Navy seals.

b.) Iran starts mass producing roadside bombs that (proudly)say... ....made in Iran

c.) Iran shoots down an f-16 just inside of it own airspace

d.) Iran kidnaps a diplomat. (if there are any in Iran)

c.) Iran makes its first nuclear weapon and...without ever testing it...sends it on a freighter into a port in California where it is picked up and transported (to some west coast city) and sucessfully detonated

e.) insert your own scenario here.

I didn't pay too much attention in 1988. My mother said she watch a program on PBS but doesn't remember the name of the segment. She was hearing that the Arm force were profiling the soldier political background and assigning them to the front where they are most likely to be killed. I have not heard this for myself. I did notice that a black woman in the arm force was reported as a suicide, while some evidence are showing that it may have been murder, and sexually assaulted in the process.

I am curious if the death percentage of profiling have been tabulated. I just have a nagging feeling that since most of the poor have enlisted because of no jobs, that this would be the army way of eliminating the lessor halves of the economy. The Final solution for the year 2000. If anyone seen the program or article on the profiling of our American soldier into battle. I would like to read it and not shoot crap out of my ass, without verifying the story.

howitwork @ 12:

can someone outline how it is a television station "wants" war with Iran?

can someone outline how (in detail) the propaganda flows from, I'm assuming Neo-cons/defense dpt/administration to Fox?

can someone point to names at this company who benefit from this kind of programming?

I clearly see that it is a warmongering viewpoint. I just wonder how it all works. Links, descriptions, accounts would be greatly appreciated.

cheers

Try watching Outfoxed or do your own homework. http://www.outfoxed.org/clips_trailer_qt.php

The Propaganda Machine rolls on.
Fox repeats its lies over and over again, until the viewer is tricked into thinking that it is truth.

What are we going to do if there are 33% of the fox viewers that still believe that WMD were found?
How do we break through to them?

Even Christine Amanpour stated that CNN was intimidated by the administration and fox to tell an altered version of the news.

Where are we? The Soviet Union, with one news station that is owned by the government.

It's good for ratings. War. Very good for ratings.

Always. Follow. The. Money.

Here's where we're at. We got someone from a foreign country (Austrailia) dictating our foreign policy.

Unfortunately Greenwald's films aren't getting to the people who need to see them:the people who are brain washed by Fox News everyday.

This is why Russia and China are having war games.

They watch Faux opinion and think we have lost our minds and need to be stopped.

Geez.

Props to Robert Greenwald, Jim Gilliam and everyone at Brave New Films. They're one of the best weapons against this Bushian Pravda

Well what do you know: Fox is using Holy Joe and Orally's "credibility" to gather support to attack Iran. I guess Fox expects everyone to listen to these two's unhinged hysterics, drop what they were doing, and start banging the war drums?

Yeah, sure... :lol:

The question is are Americans as stupid now as they were then.
We know Fox viewers are still just as stupid.
They watch Fox.
Hey. If Fox wants to invade Iran, I'll give O'Reilly my old Daisy BB gun.
Jump and die Bill.

Um, CNN ran a rather unbalanced piece on the threat of Iran yesterday in the Situation Room. It's not just Fox.

Love the way Fox figures out our next enemy.
Just like they figured out the great drug kingpin of the eighties.
Oliver North.

Like Christine said, CNN and all American media react as if Fox, Rush and Drudge have some kind of leg up on reality when in fact they are no more than third wave rightwing propaganda.

[...] House New Greenwald Video: Fox Attacks! Iran » This Summary is from an article posted at Crooks and Liars on Saturday, August 25, 2007 This [...]

I guess I haven't been paying attention of late.

So the narrative now is that the Sunni Al Qaeda is joining forces with their mortal enemies, the Shitte Iranians?

Watch this
Those advocating an attack on Iran are insane.
period.

Rupert Murdoch, Roger Ailes and the whole Fox crew are every bit as much war criminals as are the rest of BushCo.

BlueKnuckle @ 25:

Um, CNN ran a rather unbalanced piece on the threat of Iran yesterday in the Situation Room. It's not just Fox.

Take a look at this quote form CNN's Barbara Starr in the Situation Room August 24, 2007:

BARBARA STARR, CNN PENTAGON CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): The top U.S. commander for central Iraq detailed a growing Iranian campaign to smuggle in weapons, train fighters, and kill American troops.

It's worded to imply that Iranian Troops are killing American Troops. Of course that hasn't happened that we know of, but shaded and misleading statements like this can certainly lead the casual viewer to believe it had.

Barbara Starr doesn't filter anything that comes from the Pentagon. It just sorta goes in one ear and out her mouth. Other CNN reporters aren't any better.

> Rupert Murdoch, Roger Ailes and the whole Fox crew are every bit as much war criminals as are the rest of BushCo.

The only real difference, is that Murdoch is the enemy foreign, and BushCo is the enemy domestic.

The Neocons and others who want to attack Iran are running out of time. George is only going to be in office another 16 months or so and they have no idea how susceptible the next President will be to their plans.

They're probably working on George's ego, telling him how history will honor him for making such a bold move. They're probably getting a bit desperate. They need a trigger mechanism, and all they have now is the arms sales that they can't really trace back to the Iranian government. Would the Iranian government really be so stupid as to put serial numbers on munitions they were shipping to Iraq?

Incidentally, now that it's apparent that the Iranian uranium enrichment program isn't going to produce a bomb anytime soon. the Neocons are claiming that the Iranians may obtain fissionable material from North Korea to produce a bomb. If they want us to believe that, then it's kinda shoots down their argument for bombing Iran's enrichment plants doesn't it?

On Friday, RAW STORY reported interviews with two former CIA officials, both confirmed plans to "frame'' Iran for failures of surge in Iraq, thus creating the casus belli for military strikes against Iran. "If you were to report that a US surgical strike against key targets in Iran were to happen sooner rather than later, you would not be wrong,'' one of the two ex-case officers said. They pointed to Cheney as the driver, and cited recent reports that the Bush Administration will soon name the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as an "international terrorist organization'' as one of many provocations to provoke an incident that would justify U.S. attacks on Iran.

In a recent TIME magazine article Former CIA officer Bob Baer, warned that the White House is intent on bombing Iranian Revolutionary Guard targets before the end of the year. In an interview with The Weekend Australian today, Baer repeated reports he has received from top Bush Administration and intelligence community sources that an attack on Iran will take place before Jan. 2008. "What I'm getting, is a sense that their sentiment is they are going to hit the Iranians and not just because of Israel, but due to the fact that Iran is the predominant power in the Gulf and it is hostile and its power is creeping into the Gulf at every level,'' he said.

I will tell you this much----when the US attacks Iran they are going to have one huge surprise shoved up its ass! Iran is not a fractured ineffective Iraq. Iran will put up a fight---a very nasty vicious fight---and I for one think Iran can seriously fuck up the US in a fight right now. No troops left, recruitment at an all-time low, dissent growing constantly....the US couldn't pick a worse time to start messing with another country. And, if the US proposes using nukes to solve the issue with Iran than make no mistake whatsoever Iran can and will reply in kind! The next decade is looking more and more abysmal...

koko @ 29:

I guess I haven't been paying attention of late.

So the narrative now is that the Sunni Al Qaeda is joining forces with their mortal enemies, the Shitte Iranians?

Since the average American does not know the diffence between a Sunni and a Shiite, or that Iranias being Persians hate Arabs with a passion, the US government will make a case for war that will be so fucking insulting as to be almost laughable.

However the NeoCons are going to get a rude awakening when they find out that there are other evil greedy motherfuckers with big guns out there. Iran is Chinas premier energy provider, and sure as hell Beijing is not going to jeopardize their energy supplies. Plus the Japanes, Chinese, and the EU mostly are bankrolling our little "adventure" in Iraq. However all those 3 parties have substantial contracts with Iran.

Basically what the neocons are trying to do is this; "Can we (the USA) borrow some money from you (Japan, China, EU) so we can kick your friend's ass (Iran) so I can look good to my girlfriend (the American public)." Only a stupid motherfucker would think that would work, then again... Bush et al are a bunch of stupid motherfuckers. So the wonders will never cease to come our way courtesy of this clusterfuck of an administration.

However, the neo-cons are being played like a fiddle: The EU, China and Japan... are basically having the US borrow money from them for the privilege of sending its military over to Iraq to be stretched to the brink point. The only think that had saved the US from utter collapse economically has been the might of the US armed forced that loomed as a warning of the hissy fit Americans would throw if their standard of living was ever compromised (as well as their international standing). The US is now a paper tiger, and the other people who want our piece of the pie know this.

There is no honor among thieves, these stupid idiots are going to get funny rude awakening.

the same Iran which hillary clinton is frothing at the mouth to strike, the game if rigged Iran will behit wether it's a rupub or demo in power, both parties bought and paid for by the MIC, hillary clinton wasn't agaainst the Iraq war she just thinks she could have handled it better, which is GARBAGE because there was no right way to go to war with Iraq.

andy @ 38:

the same Iran which hillary clinton is frothing at the mouth to strike, the game if rigged Iran will behit wether it's a rupub or demo in power, both parties bought and paid for by the MIC, hillary clinton wasn't agaainst the Iraq war she just thinks she could have handled it better, which is GARBAGE because there was no right way to go to war with Iraq.

Very true. *sigh* Seems like jack-shit was learned from the Vietnam debacle.

IN PREPARATION FOR INVASION OF IRAN, ADMINISTRATION DIGS UP THE SHAH

You know, in a very perverse way, I do look forward to when the US attacks Iran. I think only then will americans go ape-shit enough to do something BushCo. Especially once Iran begins handing the US its own ass.

Great video.

whtt @ 35:

On Friday, RAW STORY reported interviews with two former CIA officials, both confirmed plans to "frame'' Iran for failures of surge in Iraq, thus creating the casus belli for military strikes against Iran. "If you were to report that a US surgical strike against key targets in Iran were to happen sooner rather than later, you would not be wrong,'' one of the two ex-case officers said. They pointed to Cheney as the driver, and cited recent reports that the Bush Administration will soon name the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as an "international terrorist organization'' as one of many provocations to provoke an incident that would justify U.S. attacks on Iran.

In a recent TIME magazine article Former CIA officer Bob Baer, warned that the White House is intent on bombing Iranian Revolutionary Guard targets before the end of the year. In an interview with The Weekend Australian today, Baer repeated reports he has received from top Bush Administration and intelligence community sources that an attack on Iran will take place before Jan. 2008. "What I'm getting, is a sense that their sentiment is they are going to hit the Iranians and not just because of Israel, but due to the fact that Iran is the predominant power in the Gulf and it is hostile and its power is creeping into the Gulf at every level,'' he said.

What is almost never mentioned is how Iran is likely to react after the attack. The people who are advocating attacks on Iran act as though that's the end of the story. Iran will react. They will retaliate. We may have a whole new war with a conventional front. The kind of war that our troops aren't trained to fight anymore.

When Iran was at war with Iraq they used human wave tactics very similar to the tactics the Chinese used in Korea. They were weren't afraid of taking losses. Any attack on Iran is likely to result in the loss of a lot of American lives. If we do go to war with Iran and win, then what? Do we try to occupy Iran? There hasn't been a lotta thinkin' goin' on here.

Carmikl @ 43:

whtt @ 35:

On Friday, RAW STORY reported interviews with two former CIA officials, both confirmed plans to "frame'' Iran for failures of surge in Iraq, thus creating the casus belli for military strikes against Iran. "If you were to report that a US surgical strike against key targets in Iran were to happen sooner rather than later, you would not be wrong,'' one of the two ex-case officers said. They pointed to Cheney as the driver, and cited recent reports that the Bush Administration will soon name the Iranian Revolutionary Guard as an "international terrorist organization'' as one of many provocations to provoke an incident that would justify U.S. attacks on Iran.

In a recent TIME magazine article Former CIA officer Bob Baer, warned that the White House is intent on bombing Iranian Revolutionary Guard targets before the end of the year. In an interview with The Weekend Australian today, Baer repeated reports he has received from top Bush Administration and intelligence community sources that an attack on Iran will take place before Jan. 2008. "What I'm getting, is a sense that their sentiment is they are going to hit the Iranians and not just because of Israel, but due to the fact that Iran is the predominant power in the Gulf and it is hostile and its power is creeping into the Gulf at every level,'' he said.

What is almost never mentioned is how Iran is likely to react after the attack. The people who are advocating attacks on Iran act as though that's the end of the story. Iran will react. They will retaliate. We may have a whole new war with a conventional front. The kind of war that our troops aren't trained to fight anymore.

When Iran was at war with Iraq they used human wave tactics very similar to the tactics the Chinese used in Korea. They were weren't afraid of taking losses. Any attack on Iran is likely to result in the loss of a lot of American lives. If we do go to war with Iran and win, then what? Do we try to occupy Iran? There hasn't been a lotta thinkin' goin' on here.

See my post @ no.35

Tell them 3 simple words:

NO! IRAN WAR

truth @ 45:

Tell them 3 simple words:

NO! IRAN WAR

We can scream it out loud til we're all blue in the face.....but you know damn well its going to happen!

If there's even a 1% chance that it won't happen, that's enough to take action. People play the lottery for worse odds.

Call your representatives and put on the pressure, they need to know that Americans will not tolerate another bogus, "pre-emptive" war.

koko @ 29:

So the narrative now is that the Sunni Al Qaeda is joining forces with their mortal enemies, the Shitte Iranians?

Well it worked with Iraq, didn't it. A secular dictator who did not want Al-Qaeda in Iraq, the same Al-Qaeda which had repeatedly advocated unseating and killing said dictator.

“The genius of you Americans is that you never make clear-cut stupid moves, only complicated stupid moves which make the rest of us wonder at the possibility that we might be missing something.” Gamal Abdel Nasser

This is one of my favorite short pieces by them to date.

There's as much propaganda coming from CNN, MSNBC and others as fox, don't concentrate on them entirely.
Guess cnn sees more profit in having a "war room" as opposed to a peace room . Barbara Starr is a shill and sycophant by the way she reports, and by what she doesn't say . She's removed "allegedly" from her script about Iran in Iraq, and reads verbatim what the pentagon says .

Here's what's completely off news coverage, civilians killed in Gaza, by the IDF. 2 girls were shot, by the IDF recently and not a peep form cnn. Lebanon's massive OIL slick on their cost, not a word, not an issue after Israel bombed an oil refinery in Lebanon. B Starr coverage of Ethiopia is just as appalling, when she hand picked by the pentagon to be the ONLY "reporter" in Ethiopia, covering the attack on Somalia, when there were reports from foreign sources saying american gunships were participating on attacks on Somalia, U.S. military is training , aiding the Ethiopian attACK on Somailia, a fact Starr completely sidestepped. Blantantly the U.S. media has ignored U.S. involvement in attacking somalia with Ethiopia and the "renditions" or kidnappings of people fleeing and crossing the border.
Abe Vries reported (foreigner,dutch) CNN used PSYOPS as interns from Ft. Benning , Georgia , not far from CNN HQ, a fact confirmed. CNN sends list of potential military "analyst" to the Pentagon to ask if they were good candidates for hire, to work at CNN.
MSNBC hires Lt. Rick Francona, military intelligence expert as "analyst" once AGAIN the UK'S Independent had a long article about Francona. He was the go between Reagn/bush admn. and Saddam's military., during the Iran/Iraq war and this guy isn't bias, or has an agenda or a lot of things to hid. Remember Saddam got a lot of military help form U.S. ,satellite photos, dual use helicopters, tons of Fertilizer form Dow, maybe Lt. Francona can explain some of that , if they exposed who he really is.

NBC can fire Donahue, and hire Dan Goure, who's he , a member of PNAC, easy google search found his name on their web site. Not to mention the other dozen or so of war profiteering retired Generals and colonels on the NBC and more elsewhere .
ALL, ALL these infotaining stations are stacked with pro-iraq invading, pro-iran invading sycophants and the SAME goddamn thing is happening with the build up to WAR with Iran.

They all have BLOOD on their hands . THEY are ALL are complicit .

Didn't they do this on an episode of Family Guy? (LOL) Say 9/11 or WMDs in any sentence and you can get these morons to do anything. 100% of Fox News viewers are complete idiots.

The worst thing is Fox News wants a war with Iran. But they won't send their kids their if they get their wish. Bastards.

They are going to nuke a city, blame Alqaeda and then say "Iran started it" and boom attack Iran.

And hopefully, just like the Nazi's before them, 6 years later we are marching Russian, British, Free Canadians, Free Mexicans, France, German, Indian and Chinese Troops down through the Strees of Washington DC, and giving America back to the Americans, and liberating them from the fucking Nazi's in power.

52 comments

Login or Register to post comments.