Krugman v Brooks and Reagan's 'Mistaken' Legacy of Racism
By Bill W. Sunday Nov 11, 2007 11:00am 
UPDATE: BookTV now hosting video of Krugman
Steve Benen caught on to a subtle feud being played out between NYT's Paul Krugman and David Brooks in their respective op-eds recently. Krugman's column a few weeks back pointed to Ronald Reagan's notable embrace of a Southern Strategy during a 1980 Philadelphia Miss. speech to capitalize on racism to secure the votes of those white voters who had become disenchanted by the Democratic Party following Lyndon Johnson's endorsement of Civil Rights legislation in the 60's. In an apparent response, on Fri Brooks offered up a version of what's becoming an all too common lately, a myopic defense of Reagan's infamous "states' rights" speech, taking Krugman to task without ever actually mentioning him by name.
Krugman fired back a snarky retort a day later, likewise not mentioning his fellow columnist by name. Benen writes, "As Krugman explained on his blog, Reagan's defenders would have us believe that his "states' rights" speech in Philadelphia, Mississippi, was just an "innocent mistake," which Reagan managed to make over and over again." Krugman went on to list a litany of other Reagan "mistakes" such as his oft told tale "about the welfare queen driving her Cadillac, and kept repeating the story years after it had been debunked," or that time when he "declared in 1980 that the Voting Rights Act had been "humiliating to the South." ...
Krugman wasn't done yet.
There was also that time Reagan mistakenly "intervened on the side of Bob Jones University's ban on interracial dating," or when he accidentally "fired three members of the Civil Rights Commission" only to have them later reinstated by the courts, and when he "opposed making Martin Luther King Day a national holiday." That "Poor Reagan," Krugman wittily opines, "He just kept on making those innocent mistakes, again and again and again."
Like Benen, I don't know that Brooks will be able to come up with a response to that, but should he try, I'd like to point to a few other "mistakes" that Krugman didn't mention, like Reagan's embrace of the white racist leaders of then-apartheid South Africa and his defense of Sen. Jesse Helms' attacks on Dr Martin Luther King, and his drastic cuts important social programs that provided needed assistance to minorities. How ever did anyone so mistake-prone ever manage to fall upward all the way to the White House for two terms and still manage to be held in such high regard by so many (white) people?
No, Reagan didn't invent the Southern Strategy for the GOP to capitalize on America's bigotry for their electoral gains, but his administration just about perfected and ingrained it into the core of his party. And make no "mistake" about it, no matter what Tony Snow says otherwise, racism is still alive and well and being used as an electoral crutch by the Republican Party to this very day. The only difference I can tell is today's boogieman is starting to look less like the Civil Rights Act and more like a border fence, or rather the lack thereof.








Login or Register to post comments.
Proud to be from the only blue state on that map...
Ah, our Mr. Brooks at it again with his "noble" lies.
Eventually that 'crutch' is going to break and when it does the Repubs are going to be hurting bad (more so than now) until they re-align
Pipe-smoker (see picture): that's a kind euphemism for what I'd call Raygun.
States Rights are a big deal, especially here in the South. Reagan played on it just like most politicians running for office will plug anything else they can in order to get in office.
John Wayne and Ronny Raygun were homosexual lovers.
There was also that time that time when Reagan accidentally had Col Oliver North involved with smuggling cocaine into the U.S. which led to a crack epidemic at the very same time he had so erroneously declared a war on drugs, building prisons and increasing the sentences that has resulted in the disenfranchizement of generations of mostly black would-be voters to this very day.
The republics are delighted to help Obama take out Clinton. If they succeed, they will immediately deploy such racism against him it will make Reagan look like a piker, and Obama will be left to wonder where all his good republic friends went.
CSPAN2 covered Krugman at the Book Fair in Miami this weekend. On sunday, he gave a speech about the "innocent mistakes" that Reagan kept making, and it was pretty enlightening. I'm sure CSPAN2 has the entire speech which includes a lot of good questions about the weak dollar and the impending possible recession. Interesting hour.
It's odd to look at that map and remember that I voted for Reagan, John Kerry and Tip O'Neill all of the same ballot. Mondale was not a reasonable alternative.
BTW, that was the day Kerry one the seat.
er won the seat
Palooka @ 5:
That reminds me of Ron Paul. He's quite a state's rights fan.
I thought the Southern Strategy was, "The South Shall Rise Again," now being used by the Viagra company.
Dr. Matt @ 6:
You know because you played doctor with them?
Harry Dent developed Nixon's Southern Strategy for the '68 Presidential election by playing on the recently enforced, in South Carolina at least, desegration of public schools.
Having grown up and attended public schools in SC during the period, racial integration was a pervasive fear. Despite Brown v Board of Education having been decided in 1954, and various Civil Rights legislations having been passed in 64 or so, my school didn't get its first black students until 1966 or 67. I was in 6th grade at the time. And then, it was only a handful of blacks that chose to go to white schools.
Immediately after this integration, and after Nixon so pointedly going after the white vote by using the states' rights platform, private "Christian" academies began sprouting up all over the south. Of course, no blacks were admitted, unless they were star athletes, and then only one or two were brought in.
Remember who came from this era: Lee Atwater, Whit Ayres, and a slew of other GOP stars.
Reagan didn't make a "mistake" with his States' Rights statements, it was planned all the way, and already ingrained in southern GOP strategy.
One blue state that year? Yeah right.
Diebold probably stole that one too.
xxx @ 9:
I checked the archives. Couldn't find it. C-Span chose to archive Cal Thomas, though. Sometimes I wonder about their politics. They are very conservative IMHO.
That wrinkled up old frog faced bastard was packaged and marketed as everyone's favorite uncle. I'll pay some respect his intelligence (he's a fucking MENSA member compared the present moron occupying the White House), but the fact is that the man has always been shaped by his lack of inquisitiveness into facts that conflicted with his own sense of reality (such as cows being the main source of air pollution).
Reagan was a racist. Period. Google his life, his quotes and you'll have the facts to support my opinion. He paid lip service typical of "closet racists" to equal rights. The fact is that he was, is and always will be a typical privileged white guy, with the corresponding limited view of the world.
The right wing always like to point to his championing against the accusations made against the Hollywood elite during the whole "red scare" of the McCarthy era. The fact is he was not championing the rights of individuals, he was protecting his FRIENDS and the industry that made him famous. If he was in government at that time, rest assured he would have been screaming "COMMIE" at everyone and anyone brought before the Senate Sub Committee.
It's always funny to me when repubs talk about Reagan, they seem to wish for days long since past. Just keep this in mind. RONALD REAGAN WOULD NOT MAKE THE TOP TEN LIST OF SECOND RATE PRESIDENTS, and don't you forget it!
Jo @ 17:
It doesn't look like they have the vid streaming (yet?)
http://www.booktv.org/
http://www.booktv.org/program.aspx?ProgramId=8887&SectionName=&PlayMedia=No
Slate has a good article on the "feud".
http://www.slate.com/id/2177252/fr/flyout
Call a racist pig what they are, a racist pig. We use pretty language to cover repulsive racists because maybe they'll change.Not. Their buzz is locking up brown skin people, cheating brown skin people and bombing brown skin people without any apologies.
Albatross @ 1:
Me too. We were right.
I don't know, but I think that Reagan's refusal to discuss AIDS caused suffering for so many people. Mistake? I don't think so.
Ronnie was a mistake before he was conceived until his celebrated death, maybe we could name a public restroom after him, preferably one that is used by Larry "SuperTuber" Craig republicans. The fantasy that he was some great president has been shoved down our throats since that dreadful jerks passing, no surprise coming from drones that say we're "winning" in Iraq!
The wingnut hero Ronnie was just plain fucked-up!! Maybe Dumbya can take over as the hero of the regressive fools, they can have 911 parties at Little George's phony cattle ranch, a circle jerk for knuckle draggers!
Can y'all believe they were considering Ray Gun for the part of Rick in Casablanca?
Methinks he'd be better as the Nazi commander the uber-smooth Conrad Veidt played.
Historical coincidence, Casablanca translates as white house.
Is it just me, or is that picture some sort of creepy photo shop job?
Originally, Reagan flirted with communism and tried to join the Communist Party USA but by many accounts was dissuaded to do so because many thought him "too stupid" and a "flake." Google it.
ysbaddaden @ 27:
Conrad Veidt! Be still my heart. And, no, I don't care what his sexual proclivities were.
When mentioning Reagan's "acting" career, the line that best epitomizes him is, "Wher's the rest of me?".
I know several people who think the sun shines out of Reagan's ass. Ronald Reggae is a fucking god as far as they are concerned. One dude I know went to see Reagan's coffin when it was in the Rotunda and you would have thought it was a religious pilgrimage from listening to him speak in awe. I expected this idiot to tell me his baldness had been cured or something.
It's fucking creepy the effect this jack-off has on repubs.
Erinn @ 29:
Yeah, just like the creepy doctored photo of Lee Harvey Oswald.
A creepy photo for a creepy chump.
Who knows who's agenda Regan was even fulfilling. His short term memory was probably already impacted by his looming full blown alzheimer's. He would have been easily manipulated. An almost perfect Manchurian candidate, eh?
Fanon @ 28:
Not a photshop job. Reagan was well known as a "hunk" in his Hollywood days. The devil is in the details.
Sachem @ 10:
Why wasn't Mondale a reasonable alternative? That was my first election, and I had no problem voting for the former VP. I was also in one of four counties in California to vote against my state's former governor. Oh how things have changed!
Jo @ 34:
Yes, but that photo still doesn't look right. It doesn't look like his head belongs there
Fanon @ 36:
The photo is real. It was a well publicized snap of him during his Hollywood days, but that is what I always thought of Ronny Raygun, that his head didn't belong there.
History will judge Reagan the best president of the last century, and Lincoln the century before. Both Republicans.
Krugman has never been able to come to terms with this fact. Why is that?
dennis @ 16:
All it means is that Reagan got at least "50% +1" in 49 out of 50 states. It doesn't mean EVERYONE in those states voted for him. (I sure as hell didn't!)
After one of the massacres of demonstrators in apartheid South Africa, Reagan thought it was an adequate response to claim 'but some of the cops were black too'.
Republicans will always be republicans.
xxx @ 9:
Thanks to the good folks who brought us warrantless wiretapping, Comcast hs moved C-SPAN2 to a digital network and we have to pay a premium fee to access. I am going to look for a repeat on the internets.
Krugman's blog is/was a great read. I look forward to the book-tv replay.
ysbaddaden @ 13:
The Southern strategy is to gain independence from a national government that generally doesn't give two craps about Southern issues.
Oh my, this is dreadful, watching a couple of pekingese yapping at each other in public.
dennis @ 38:
That's the dumbest thing people say. The fact is that after Johnson embraced the civil rights act all the Dixiecrats became Republicans. The parties switched. The democrats today are the party of Lincoln and Lincoln tried to warn us about Bush.
"If this were a dictatorship, it would be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator," Bush joked.
-- CNN.com, December 18, 2000 http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0012/18/nd.01.html
"A dictatorship would be a heck of a lot easier, there's no question about it, " [Bush] said.
-- Business Week, July 30, 2001 http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/jul2001/nf20010730_347.htm
dennis @ 38:
I think FDR might have a thing or two to say about that.
Maybe someone has pointed it out already, but the race card gets played whenever a candidate says he's strong on law and order as well as strongly against illegal aliens. And the same goes for anyone who says we have to kill all the islamofascists.
It's about kicking "colored ass." It is what excites the Republican base. And I believe that's why Rudy G will be the Republican nominee.
dennis @ 38:
Reich-wing obsession with ronny raygun certainly is in line with their homosexual tendencies/base.
Reich-wingers also claim that history will judge herr dubyah as one of the best presidents ever.....enough said.
dennis @ 38:
Bush 41 and his psychopathic son have run up 50% of this 230+ year old county's debt. Throw in Reagan, and that percentage increases to 70%. No doubt, you'll tell us how he single-handedly defeated communism, despite the fact The USSR was on the brink of collapse. He just accelerated their demise by a few years by forcing them to spend themselves into debt, kind of what were doing now.
Lincoln saw there only being two real threats to our country, and both were internal not some foreign enemy. He saw them as being mob rule (lynchings etc) which was the threat of the many who would not honor the constitution and law that comes from it, and the fact that our political system could never satisfy the needs of "an Alexander, a Caesar, or a Napoleon" (ie: a Bush/Cheney) which was the threat of the individual who would not honor the constitution and law that comes from it.
Lincoln believed that people should start a secular civil religion in which people are taught through schools to worship the Constitution and the rule of law to combat those threats.
Palooka @ 42:
What are the "Southern issues" being ignored?
dennis @ 38:
Krugman has never been able to come to terms with this fact. Why is that?
Good one, dennis. Monday mornings, even holiday Mondays, really call for a good joke to get the day started. Ronnie as great as Lincoln? Still laughing as I type.
It sounds as though you might have special insight into the delusional behaviour of the True Believers, though.
Yep, Ray Gun doubled the 200 year old deficit he promised to cut in just eight.
Homelessness increased to a soaring level.
The economy was supported by borrowed money.
Nothing ever trickled down, partially because that's when outsourcing, and "right-sizing" (being fired for no reason) started becoming the norm.
Racism increased as did the hegemony of a fringe branch of Xianity.
We went to war in Grenada over an airstrip built by a British touring company that Ray Gun insisted was by the Soviet Union.
The Soviet Union was still around when Ray Gun left office, but because of Mikail Gorbachev's Glasnost and Perestroika, the seeds were sewn for the ultimate collapse during boosh I's term.
Repeating the same debunked story over and over...
Hmm that rings a bell, doesn't it Rudy??
As for all the trolls here today- Reagan was a meat puppet, probably already addled by Alzheimers. The country was run by Meese/Baker cabal with Ronald the Elder as TV bobblehead.
Ronald Reagan: The Accidental Racist.
Not.
I was in the Air Force the last two years of Carter, and the first two years of Ray Gun. Carter was a wet blanket, however under Ray Gun we had a problem with spare parts. For every ten jets approximately 7 were waiting for parts, and probably 4 never seemed to get them.
We had a flood of experienced NCO's with stripes down to their elbows, and officers with all kinds of jewelry on their epaulets resigining in droves. One, because they were humiliated that they now had to get food stamps to support their families, and two the longer you stayed the less benefits you had. Ray Gun was unilaterally breaking our "contracts" by extracting benefits we signed up under. Fortunately some of them like VA home loans came back under Clinton.
I'm sure the JCS and the Pentagon adored Ray Gun but the more boots on the ground military loathed him.
Ultimate website and ultimate post muhaaaaaawwwww but why i dont find you before seems you never post your stories in www.laadi.com actuly indians like laadi.com and they used to search for good stories there. i will tell all my friend about your website.
dennis are you pwi (posting while intoxicated) again?
reagan > FDR? Get serious.
Reagan's base were Michael Douglas in "falling down" angry white guys who blamed everyone else for their failures
ysbaddaden @ 55:
Was he? Or is this furthering a neocon narrative on him?
Similar to "Mondale not being a reasonable alternative." Really?
MN USA @ 24:
Me three... Damned straight we were right. I sure hope Ronnie "Ketchup is a vegetable" Reagan is roasting in hell, where he belongs....
Now that i've actually searched for the Krugman speech, I'm not sure if it went up recently, but here is the linky.
xxx @ 61:
Damn, they must have just added the video to that. The little 'watch it now' button wasn't there when I posted the same link above.
Thanks. :)
One thing is obvious, reich-wingers hold their own at MUCH lower standards than the Democratic Party. Just imagine the [fake] outrage from the reich-wingers if that while on the watch of a Democratic President that the dollar hit an all-time low, oil prices hit an all-time high, a housing boom turned into a housing bust overnight, an endless war with no real objective that has cost >$500 billion, 30K wounded, and 4000 dead, threatening to start another war after 2 already failed, and single handily destroyed the upstanding reputation of the US.
jwf @ 50:
Education, mainly.
Plus, let's not forget the universal fuck up that was the Gulf Coast.
Being a classical conservative, and a southerner, if States had more control and more power we wouldn't have had to rely on Bush and FEMA for help.
Dr. Matt @ 63:
IOKIYAR
DAVID BROOKS IS A FUCKING PREPPY DICK!
NOT SURE WHO'S WORSE, HIM OR TUCKER
CARLSON!!!
Palooka @ 64:
You have control over your education, though. Granted, if you want Federal funds you have to comply with the NCLB standards which are a burden, not to mention an ineffective bunch of crap. Otherwise, education is a state issue with predominately state funding. Correct me if I am wrong.
Reagan was popular with the "daddy issue" Republicans, of which there are many. Little children in adult bodies who can't get over the fact that "Leave it to Beaver" was just a TV show.
Sally @ 8:
Sadly, I think you are right. There is still a good deal of closet racism in this country. Most are Republicans but a good number of independents and even a few Dems are too. They will not admit to it openly but when they get in that ballot box they will not vote for a black man. Obama will be criticized by the right wingers for incredibly stupid reasons, like his lapel pin choice, and he will just look bewildered when it sticks and drags him down. It's because the closet racists just want an excuse to not vote for him and put him down to their friends. Any old excuse will do, even a really stupid one.
There are also a good number of closet misogynists in this country too who, deep down, don't like to see a woman in a position of power. A similar dynamic will play out for them if Hillary Clinton is the Dem nominee. The difference is, Clinton will not look bewildered when she is attacked, she will fight back. Hard.
My prediction:
Dem nominee Edwards = moderate Dem win
Dem nominee Clinton, Biden, or Dodd = close Dem win
Dem nominee Obama or Richardson = close Repub win
Dem nominee Kucinich = big Repub win
And lest we forget, according to Ronnie, catsup is a vegetable and nutritious.
At least 20,000 Americans died of AIDS on Reagan's watch. All I'll remember of this despicable man is that he allowed dozens of my friends to die without blinking. There should be a line in the Republican party platform that states "complete disregard for human lives" especially gay ones.
Frank Cocozzelli @ 2:
What lies?
Me too I am for state right as long as it is within the constitution.
Sometime a minority of people in some southern states have problems with the constitution. Fine with that. Leave the United State then for some less free (and as a result poorer) countries because the constitution is the foundation of the United State.
Tom Sawyer @ 72:
Forget that one, there are lots of lies
Don't forget how Reagan used racial tensions and the Fair Housing Act to garner support from whites in Orange County Calif in the 60's.
Fostering animosity towards the diverse Los Angeles, Reagan warned Orange County whites that "the jungle was waiting to take over" in the aftermath of the Watts Riots.
And in response to the Fair Housing Act, whose opponents referred to as the "Forced Housing Act" Reagan quipped, "if an individual wants to discriminate against Negroes or others in selling or renting his house he has a right to do so."
Wow, Thom Hartmann played a 1946 stump speech that Reagan gave in support of Harry Truman, and he was hitting all the high points of economic populism. Hartmann's story is that it was only after Ronnie married Nancy Davis that her rich daddy converted Ronnie to the Republican party.
heh, watching the video of Krugman from CSpan's Book TV they mention that Paul Krugman actually served in Reagan's administration
Krugman, Paul R. (10/82-10/83)
http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/reference/ceastaff.html
MN USA @ 24:
Me too. We were right.
Me three.
The Reich Wing Myth Machine made Reagan out to be something he wasn't, a great president. He was a race baiter, gave us AIDSgate, Iran-Contra, trickledown voodoo economics, a near nuclear confrontation with the Soviet Union and was the biggest tax cut for the rich and deficit spending president in US history before Chimp came along and broke Reagan's budget busting record. Reagan was a bastard, a talentless "B" actor and a "C" president at best.
Dr. Matt @ 47:
What Bill Maher calls "their campy fixation". It really is disturbing...
dennis @ 38:
Because it's not true.
Both Roosevelts, Truman, Eisenhower, Clinton, Johnson(with his Vietnam baggage) and Wilson(another racist) will all fare better. And if not fer his hubris, ya could include Nixon on this list too.
Down the line, Reagan will be seen for what he was- capable of governance yet only electable because he knew how to play the fear card. Reagan 's "greatness" is based upon the fact that he was President when the economy began to turn around after a decade long downward spiral (it's the Federal Reserve that ya can thank fer that one) and the then imminent demise of the Soviet Union(which ya credit to every President from Truman through GHW Bush fer because over a 45 year span they never allowed the State Department to backtrack from Cold War doctrine). The others I listed built, Reagan destroyed. His legacy- 8 years of judiciary appointments- will be a bitter one.
Me too.
We always go BLUE when it matters.
The occasional Gov & Sen. not withstanding.
Did anyone even mention Bitburg?
Szin @ 59:
With his talk of turning down thermastats and putting on sweaters he was right, but sounded like one's spinster aunt. The fact that he ran with his teeth baring grin, then became dour and humorless looking didn't help.
He also didn't help himself by refusing to be a showboat. He succeeded in freeing the American Hostages by freezing Iranian bank accounts. But they waited until after the election to release them so as not to help his reelection attempts.
Although it must be obvious that "states rights" issues are invoked only when legislating discrimination, Reagan rolled over the rights of states during his administration. He demanded that all states raise the legal drinking age from 18 to to 21y.o. otherwise lose federal highway funding. All complied- including Mondale's state.
I've got a big sloppy wet kiss for whoever posted the BookTV link; his discussion of bipartisanship is exactly what I needed to hear.
hey, the gipper looks a lot like my distant cousin, bob dobbs.....
Krugman on Cspan's Book.tv: http://www.booktv.org/program.aspx?ProgramId=8887&SectionName=&PlayMedia...
Did everyone forget the right wing meme in '84 ?
"Fritz and tits" ?
fred c dobbs @ 87:
Praise Bob & Connie!
I saw the NASCAR races on ABC a couple of weeks ago, and for once, I was there at the beginning: where the ceremonies basically started with a minister invoking God to intervene for the best driver, and that nobody be killed (well, I'm for that.) But it was such a totemistic, weird ritual, that it made me nuts.
Paul K @ 83:
Ironically, I was listening to the Ramones as I was reading your comment :-)
fred c dobbs @ 87:
This one grinds my gears. For the nth time, Ray-gun played the gipper, he was not the gipper. A George Gipp was THE Gipper.
Fucking Reagan to the day he died never corrected that fact, and I am sure that playing all those instruction films for the USO must have counted as hand to hand combat in WWII for his feeble rotten mind.
Taking credit for other people's achievements, ain't that the most republican on "virtues."
Dr. Who @ 92:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLWGSRQrbQs
Jim H @ 91:
... and yet everyone watching the race is praying that there is a massive pile up so they get their ticket's worth of gory.
The cognitive dissonance of large parts of the public in this country --the so-called NASCAR crowd-- is only rivaled by their erectile dysfunction I guess.
Dr. Who @ 93:
Ronnie Raygun was still known as and has been referred to as the Gipper a gazillion times over so many times now that although almost no one knows who George Gipp was anymore, almost everyone knows its a reference to Reagan when someone says "Gipper." That's just how it goes.
ysbaddaden @ 94:
I was thinking more along these lines:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vAqlRpSIDE
Paul Krugman: The Conscience of a Liberal
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RajR6n_GzZE
I like that picture. Add me to the list of proud Minnesotans...dont'cha know.
Anyone else remember Minnesota's punishment for not giving ronnie his clean sweep in the form of proposed nuclear waste dump sites?
justabill @ 96:
I know, I just won't give that fucking bastard Raygun the benefit of getting away with such bullshit. And watch, how the fucking GOPers will bring him back for '08 with another "let's win it for the Gipper."
Dr. Who @ 97:
All I wanna know is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lmp2c4DDzLc
Why didn't they?
Palooka @ 64:
Yeah, because the South has such a great track record on their own.
There is always an excuse, isn't there?
justabill @ 96:
Just like if Freddie Thompson gets elected (shudder), we'll always think of him when someone says "air traffic controller."
ysbaddaden @ 101:
Because...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihvj1vCCSuo
Rusty Shackleford @ 103:
I wonder if he will use that Law & Order chime as the musical theme for his campaign.
Watch for that "I am Fred Thompson and I approve this message.... TWONNNN TWAUUUUNNNNN"
No wonder they prep him as the neo-Regan. Same shit, different smell...
This debate is important, but Reagan is long dead.
What about Ron Paul? He's probably the biggest living proponent of states' rights, and has a long history of association with white racist groups. His rhetoric falls right in line with the Macaca/Clarence Thomas/Welfare Queen crowd. Same euphemisms, same racism.
Annoyed Canuck @ 106:
He has managed to bite the hand that feeds him. He is a non-issue, because the GOP will dispose of him.
Hopefully, he believes that his libertarian insane base is large enough that he will make a run for it as an independent. That will fracture the wing nut vote.
However, if Hillary is the Dem front runner, then it doesn't really matter... as we will be in for another 4 years of the same shit. Maybe a bit more gentler and not as brain dead as the past 7 years, but equally stinking...
dr.who...
jebus, ya think i don't know the difference?? have a glass of milk, a cookie, take a nap... then praise bob!
btw, dr who was the lamest fuckin' thing on tb.
Need more proof? Check out Tom Tancredos new open borders-daisycutter ad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZBjXr5CWUI
Annoyed Canuck @ 106:
Mentioned Ron Paul way back at # 12. I was hoping to lure out his supporters. It's always fun to watch them implode.
And I have to hold my head together when they start to complain about what a failure Jimmy Carter was. He had the legacy of the Vietnam mess and financial ruin of our HUGE debt from that war to deal with.
This horse's ass gets praise for being ...what, the gipper? Give me a break. This "larger than life" president with Alzheimer's did more to start the ruin of this country than anyone before his time. Of course the current monkey in the White House makes him look like a hero, but a hero he is NOT.
Maybe this is why the chimp thinks history will be kind to him. After all, if history is naming airports and other places after this sack of shit, surely they can find something nice to say about the bush. I couldn't...but reality plays little part in history for these neocon fantasy land types.
fred c dobbs @ 108:
I did not know they had Dr. Who on tuberculosis...
Obviously, reading and comprehension are not your forte. I never claimed you didn't know the difference, I am just disgusted by the fact that Reagan condoned such bullshit. The sooner people stop giving that piece of shit even the benefit of being referred as the gipper the better.
Sorry if I offended your sensibilities... jeez.
does brooks still have a job? of all the de-bunked, phony pundits he is by far the worst!
Hmmm. Krugman. Here is a man who not only was a paid consultant to Enron, but a former President Reagan staffer.
tb....get it?
mst3k was better by far...trailer park boys is the funniest thing ever on tb...and raygun was, indeed, a piece of shit shill for the owners of this sinking turd of a country.
and fred c dobbs is a vietnam veteran.
praise bob and connie!
Dr. Who @ 112:
Well, I'm glad then that I didn't refer to Reagan as the Gipper when I wrote this post. I almost did actually, in a sort of snarky way which is just how most of the post was, but just because I hate referring to a person over and over by the same name I usually try to change it up some, but then I changed it back to Reagan at the end anyway.
Amused @ 114:
As an acclaimed economist that's not surprising at all actually. I mentioned he served in Reagan's administration above on this thread. That just helps back up that he knows what he's talking about when it comes to Reagan's legacy.
justabill @ 117:
By that standard, those who held more significant positions in the Reagan Administration and who hold a different opinion that Krugman would know more of what they speak on this matter than Krugman due to their more significant positions?
1984 was my first election. Ray Gun was the first republican ass-wipe that I was proud to vote against.
Clinton and Gore are still the only guys I ever voted for that won the election!
Ray Gun went a long way toward ruining this country, and now Chimpy is finishing the job.
Has anyone else noticed that standing there, holding that pipe, "Ron" looks more like "Bob" of the Church of the Sub-Genius?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J.R._%22Bob%22_Dobbs
HulksHeroes @ 111:
My father was career AF before he left in disgust, he was part of the SAC program that re-evaluated the B1 program. He was instrumental in singing off some of the reports that ended up canning the B-1A in the mid 70s before my time. An expensive piece of shit, by his accounts. Rockwell basically went behind the Carter administration and used AF sympathetic personnel high up to siphon funds to continue B1 development. Carter had also put a lot of pressure on Rockwell, nee North American, for all the fuckups they and mismanagements of the Space shuttle, and the space programs during the early 70s... which were in the cutting table by the Carter admin, who was trying to figure what we could and couldn't pay now that the Vietnam and Oil crisis had left their mark.
This defense contractor then put enough pressure and financed a big chunk of the Reagan campaign. The pentagon literally purged most of the competent personnel who were not sympathetic to useless projects, and made sure Carter was left in a check mate position. Even the group that managed the distribution of funds from the B1 et al programs, into what later became research platforms for stealth technology were considered toxic at some point. Reagan won the election, then Rockwell got their revenge: a more expensive piece of shit shoveled down the tax payers throats. Only after basically 3+ decades of continuous development the B1 fleet achieved over 70% of availability, and over 1/4 of the fleet has already been retired. Meanwhile, a lot of the B52s refitted under Carter (at a fraction of the B1A program) are still flying, and were basically the only long range bomber in continuous alert (since the B1 was in partial alert, during most of its career, which basically means they could only be used if the heavy shit broke out and there was no other thing at hand). And most of the deep penetration roles are now handled by B2s developed initially under the Carter admin.
Meanwhile, the B1 project has been a continuous revenue stream for the contractors who are employed and paid for to fix their own fuck ups. To the point, that Boeing bought Rockwell not for the technology, but rather for the stream of revenue that their parasitic operations with the space program and the B1 programs were siphoning.
Reagan for all intents and purposes was a puppet. And he was one of the salvo shots of the defense industry, who made it clear that they were not to be fucked with... and that the situation is not that defense contractors are here to protect the country, but the other way around.
However, GOPers are masters at marketing. And a significant amount of dumb masses out there cheer for them as the party of national defense, as they are being pick pocketed clean by these "saviors." A dumb ass and their money are born every minute, I guess. Ironically Carter, who served in the silent service and who held several advanced degrees, was over ruled in defense matters by a jackass with little education and whose only military experience amounted at playing roles for army instructional films during WWII.
Carter, who served in the silent service and holds several degrees, has been characterized as a failure for not bringing the hostages back home on time, even though eventually they all returned in one piece and not a shingle shot was exchanged. While Reagan, whose only military experience is acting for Army instructional films during WWII and who barely managed to graduate from a 3rd tier university, is seen as the hero. Yet everyone forgets the hundreds of dead marines his dumb ass caused when he wanted to play war games in Lebanon.
widespread (120)
see comment 87
6 Dr. Matt Says: John Wayne and Ronny Raygun were homosexual lovers.
They both had a wide stance didn't they?
The more that I realize that Reagan did either totally on his own or with a push from his more oriented evil cronies, the more that I realize that he started the attack on middle America and made many Americans only worry about the all important "me" rather than the collective whole of the United States. I guess that I am one of those sad baby boomers who are lost in the 60's, but at least we cared about someone other than ourselves. I am betting on Krugman to win by a knockout in this battle of the facts.
Why am I not surprised? And yeah I guess people shouldn't have the right to vote because it's embarrassing (sarcasm). What a joke Reagan is. Why people think so highly of him I'll never know or understand. He's your typical republican politician.
Lee Atwater on Ronald Reagan's version of the Southern Strategy:
I think that while it is easy for all you nay-sayers to sit there and point to all his mistakes and call Reagan a racist, I think we should all just take a step back and remember... that he also took the time to hate homosexuals. A man of many talents.
Emily @ 125:
He had a great speech writer, and good natural charisma. If the Dems had a brain, they'd stop nominating walking sleep remedies like Kerry and Gore (Version 1.0), or anti-charmisatics like Hillary or Dukakis.
There is a minimum bar of like-ability and interesting personality that really isn't that high. Meet that, and have a good brain for policy on top... you're all set. Of course, the Dems apparently hate Edwards, so... here we go again....
jwf @ 48:
I'm sure Osama will want to take all the credit for sending the US into bankruptcy -- but I think most of the credit should go to Bush.
In the USSR, it was the black market, and Lek Walenza with the Labor Unions -- oh, and the incredibly corrupt inefficiency of it all that brought them down. I think Reagan was trying to get a secret chunk of cash to try and prop up the USSR but it was too little too late. I'm sure that the old cold war folks were very worried when Clinton talked about the "peace dividend." I'm sure they had to scramble to come up with another scary enemy that would keep the big bucks flowing.
swarmofkillermonkeys @ 128:
Hey, I like Edwards. On Air America, Edwards and Kucinich always seem to top the straw polls. I'm sure that Hillary gets a boost, because the media gives it to her.
Gore 2.0 is a great candidate.
The two that have the LEAST margin to beat Republicans are Hillary and Obama -- small wonder the Republicans keep pushing their media to promote them.
VitriolAndAngst @ 130:
Preaching to the choir here.... but almost EVERYONE I meet says that. Even all the Kucinich die-hards peg (correctly) Edwards and their close #2 for a progressive.
Yet, the media obscures him, and supposedly the pollsters prefer Hillary. There really needs to be a change in the nomination process when this many people like a candidate, but it doesn't show up.
Forget Reagan, I think Edwards could paint that whole map BLUE in the general!
"racism is still alive and well and being used as an electoral crutch by the Republican Party to this very day"
Damn right. How else do you explain the fact that Harold Ford, who was leading in the polls as close as two weeks before last November's elections in Tennessee's senatorial race, went on to lose after a last-minute blitz by the Republicans to smear Ford with innuendos obviously calculated to invoke the time-honored Southern taboo against mixed-race relations?
Tennessee has been my family's home for many generations, but I will never live there now, it has disgusted me so.
VitriolAndAngst @ 129:
No kidding, I remember how we went from defeating the evil empire to get engaged in the "mother of all battles" in record time. I am sure Boosh the 1st was all "shit, shit, I need to get me one of them bad guys, now that this Reagan bastard is done sucking dry the Ruskie boogie well. I may be a lame duck president having to face and answer real issues now that them people are not going to be distracted by the possibility of a Red Dawn any day now..."
I am always amazed, and I guess the old adagio always holds true: No one ever went broke by underestimating the intellect of the average American.
Reagan's genius? Simply re-label "borrow and spend like you got it" for "its morning in America" And... voila, it is all good! Marketing is what this society made of two bit idiots seems to crave. He sure manage to fuck us royally, but he did it with such a grace and soft voice! Best president ever, for sure! In some senses Boosh the 2nd has outdone him: He managed with a straight face to have the middle class fight for the tax cuts that only benefited the rich. I mean how many people did ever benefit from the Estate Tax? But he sure made it seem that the world would come to an end as we know it if them rich folks had to pay taxes on money they didn't earn. And on, and on, and on...
I am surprised no one has brought up that old bag of bones Nancy using an astrologer to influence matters of national security! Now, that was totally awesome!
humphs75 @ 132:
Well, Harold Ford turned to be a DLC turn coat nut trying to out-right the GOP every time he opens his mouth in the past year or so. So maybe the Tennessee electorate did know something the rest of us didn't at that time. :-) It seems they ended electing the more "liberal" choice (not really, but when Harold Ford starts to share views to the right of Lieberman, you know we ain't in Kansas anymore...)
Reagan (and Bush 41) would have been carbon copies of Dumbya, had they had repuke congressional majorities.
How can people believe the GOP promotes racism, hating anyone who isn't white like they are? Look at some facts. The last time a majority of white Americans voted for a Democrat for president was 1964. The last time a northern Democrat was elected president was a mere 47-yrs. ago. A map of the Confederacy during the Civil War imposed on a map of the Red States in the South, which consistently votes Republican, is a match. But there are always a few token minorities at the GOP nominating conventions. Hmmm, maybe the GOP is a tiny little bit racist. I wonder what the usual all white male line-up of Republican presidential candidates thinks.
You guys call this evidence of racism?
Very, very weak.
Tell you what, you show me Reagan doing something really racist and evil, then maybe I'll start believing you. Like, what if he laid a wreath at a graveyard for an organization dedicated to exterminating Jews from the earth? Give me something like that, don't give me coded language and symbolism and fables. Give me a wreath at the graves. Have him implement a policy of stripping all federal funding of combating a disease that seems to overwhelmingly affect gay men. They're different, and therefore probably deserve a plague, right?. Show me those kinds of actions, maybe then I'll come on board. Show me that, and I'll probably have to agree that his hilarious death in a goo-brained oblivion instantly improved the world.
But until then, you liberals are just bitter that our guy saved the world from all bad things and should be on the dime.
Muddy @ 4:
I don't know if anyone else touched upon this, but no, he was not a pipe smoker. He was, according to most sources I've read, a non-smoker. The pipe is merely a prop. He also participated in advertisements testifying to the "milder" and "cooler smoking" taste of Chesterfield's on a couple of occasions. Of course, fewer people (not counting, perhaps, tobacco company executives who hid scientific data on the dangers) knew how dangerous these products were and there was no stigma to these types of ads so it's more a testament to the times than on Reagan himself (he was, allegedly, an actor after all).
Funny how liberals believe every word the obsessed Krugman writes.
Former Reagan aide (and former Enron adviser) falsely accuses Reagan of racism.
Tom Wicker wrote that when the candidate "spoke early in his campaign at Philadelphia, Miss., without mentioning the names of three civil rights workers murdered there a quarter-century ago, it was clear that his campaign appeal would not be to blacks or liberals." But Wicker, whose column appeared Nov. 18, 1988, was referring not to Reagan but to Michael Dukakis. The Reagan speech seemed to have escaped Wicker's notice.
Why does Reagan's Philadelphia speech loom so much larger in today's liberal imagination than it did when Reagan was alive and active in politics? Because today's liberals yearn for their elders' moral authority. Tony Lewis and Tom Wicker were civil rights advocates when it mattered. Paul Krugman was 11 when the Civil Rights Act of 1964 became law. For someone Krugman's age, it has never required any courage to be a man of the left, and there has never been a cause on which the liberal-left turned out to be clearly on the right side.
Krugman has no business browbeating anyone about civil rights, and his badmouthing of Reagan is especially rich. Reagan's putative racism was not offensive enough to deter Krugman from taking a job in 1982 as a staff economist for the president's Council of Economic Advisers. The former Enron adviser is a former Reagan aide too!
dennis @ 38:
Only by uninformed, racist white people. White people and brown people who KNOW better will judge him as the worst president, second only in ignominy to Bush Jr. with Bush Sr. running a close third.
fred c dobbs @ 122:
Ah, yes, thanks. I missed that.
Unfortunately it is all true and reminds one of what Lincoln said. A house divided will not stand. This rot is and will destroy America. Surprisingly however it is the ignorant by choice bigots who work against their own best interest. It is the rest of us who get pulled down by this tide. It wasn't only the rich slave owners who supported the Civil War. One wonders why the poor who fought so valiantly for the Confederacy fooled themselves into fighting on the rich man's behalf. Without them there wouldn't have been a Civil War and without the modern day bigots the Republicans wouldn't be able to pick our pockets, transfer our money upwards and destroy our country.
Ray Gun also used to be the head of a union, the SAG, because he ratted out and destroyed the careers of contemporaries to McCarthy based only on innuendoes.
Joseph not Jenny.
croatoan @ 126:
That's what David Duke did when he tried to make the lateral move between being a KKK Granddragon, to Republican politician.
SO THIS ALL PROVES
REAGAN WAS A BIGOT!
RACIST REAGAN
IN THE BIGOT G.O.P.ING PARTY!
Login or Register to post comments.