IF you think they're kidding Pam has the screen capture
http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=3734

As I have said many times to many a Republican. Why are you so obsessed with gay sex?

I had a conserva-pud talking about Bill Clinton and he mentioned something about the angle of his penis(supposedly something Monica Lewinsky alleged).

I stopped walking and looked at him and said: For a supposed straight man you seem awfully interested in another man's penis.

He stopped talking and walked away from me.

-GSD

They left off "Which bathroom has the most gay activity"

What should I be mad about today....

Here is what i think should be in their top ten:

"How Bush Fucked Up after 9/11."
"How Bush Fucked Up Iraq."
"How Bush Fucked Up the Constitution."
"How Bush Fucked Up America's Reputation."
"How Bush Fucked Up our children's educational system."
"How Bush Fucked Up our children's health system."
"How Bush Fucked Up the Republican Party's Future in America."
"How Bush Fucked Up the Presidency."
"How Bush Fucked Up America."
"How Bush Fucked Up."

By comparison, here is the list of the top viewed wiki pages.

http://tinyurl.com/3cru3q

thinking about? maybe the better word would be:

longing for, curious about, wondering, justifying, harboring, dreaming, hoping, inquisitive, aspiring, craving, desiring, eager, ready, stimulated, turned on*, willing, wishful, yearning

According to Conservapedia, The University of Chicago did a study of gay men living in Chicago's Shoreland neighborhood. Ok, I am a native Chicagoan and a graduate of Univ. of Chicago and have no clue what the neighborhood of Shoreland is. Perhaps it's a new name I'm not familiar with or a reference to Boystown. Maybe the school wanted to create a crusing guide for conservatives.

Correction....Shoreland is an undergraduate Dorm. They did a study of gay activity in a dorm?

GSD @ 3:

As I have said many times to many a Republican. Why are you so obsessed with gay sex?

I had a conserva-pud talking about Bill Clinton and he mentioned something about the angle of his penis(supposedly something Monica Lewinsky alleged).

I stopped walking and looked at him and said: For a supposed straight man you seem awfully interested in another man's penis.

He stopped talking and walked away from me.

-GSD

LOL... This cracked me up! Thanks for the laughs. Funny how when you state the obvious, those speaking find it hard to say much of anything. Good for you! Keep it up!! (in all senses of that phrase...)

GSD @ 6:

Breaking News:

The 'conservative' Conservapedia has been renamed:

PicklePedia.

-GSD

No. It's "Conservapedophile".

Their obsession with gays is, like the catholic cult's, to find a scapegoat for their own proclivities.

Well, that list is fitting actually. Just look at all of the Republicans. They always end up getting caught having sex with the same sex so its perfectly natural that they are always thinking about it. They don't think about it to condemn it, they think about it because that is what they want to do.

xoites defends Constitution @ 9:

Here is what i think should be in their top ten:

"How Bush Fucked Up after 9/11."
"How Bush Fucked Up Iraq."
"How Bush Fucked Up the Constitution."
"How Bush Fucked Up America's Reputation."
"How Bush Fucked Up our children's educational system."
"How Bush Fucked Up our children's health system."
"How Bush Fucked Up the Republican Party's Future in America."
"How Bush Fucked Up the Presidency."
"How Bush Fucked Up America."
"How Bush Fucked Up."

That's our top ten.

They spend their time thinking about how much your nuts itch.

They want to help you scratch them.

It's a platonic thing, honest.

Dennis Kucinich is the PEOPLES choice and not the media's.
Dennis Kucinich is his OWN (FREE and CLEAR). Unlike the other candidates bought on credit and later have to pay back THROUGH "political favors to the corporate creditors.

Don't let the media and the polls (Corporation) tell you what is best for you.

Dennis Kucinich a President for the PEOPLE (vote in 2008)

Willie @ 27:

This is on the "Breaking News" section of the Conservapedia main page:

"The most liberal states have the highest repeat abortion rates
Maryland, Massachusetts and New York,
and these states are among the highest in breast cancer rates."

Wasn't this link discredited years ago?

yes, it was discredited...but, reich-wingers have never been that concerned with facts and reality.

Well poo, I would of swore Homosexuals and syphilis would of been waaayyyyyy ahead of Gay bowel syndrome.

Republicans seem to 'research' homosexuality a lot because they're trying to figure out if it's contagious and whether they can take antibiotics to get rid of it.

Have you guys actually read the "homosexuality" page on Conservapedia? Who runs that site? Fred Phelps?

I hate to rain on everyone's parade, but the reason for the conservapedia results are probably due to Lewis Black highlighting it on the daily show back in June.

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/06/28/daily-show-lewis-black-exposes-...

I doubt that the site gets _that_ much traffic, so this exposure probably skewed the results enough to explain what we are currently seeing. Funny, yes. However, there is a rational explanation aside from a vast, Republicans are really gay conspiracy theory.

Udon Nomee @ 38:

Question: So, what's up with conservative women? What do they see in these self-hating men who cannot, or will not, acknowledge their own sexuality?

You have to be fucking kidding. The only things that interests conservative women is money and vibrators. The husband is a vehicle, an means to an end. They reproduce because they are expected to, and the other country club bitches are always talking about Ashley and Greggory. So youz gots to keep up with the DuPonts. BTW, ever check out the DuPont mental health records? What a bunch of fuckin loonies. Almost as bad as those retarded bushes.

Willie @ 28:

This is on the "Breaking News" section of the Conservapedia main page:

"The most liberal states have the highest repeat abortion rates
Maryland, Massachusetts and New York,
and these states are among the highest in breast cancer rates."

Wasn't this link discredited years ago?

Yeah? So? What's your point exactly? :-)

GSD @ 3:

I had a conserva-pud talking about Bill Clinton and he mentioned something about the angle of his penis(supposedly something Monica Lewinsky alleged).

As I recall, that was Paula Jones. She claimed her supposed knowledge of Clinton's "anatomical peculiarity" was proof of her claims.

Sick bastards!

Cheney @ 35:

Republicans seem to 'research' homosexuality a lot because they're trying to figure out if it's contagious and whether they can take antibiotics to get rid of it.

More "research" for the Air Force's "gay bomb".

Now we know that they MOSTLY think about. I'd say that's a teeny bit obsessive.

I often scoot over to Conservapedia to "check facts". Often, for topics conservatives like to avoid, there hasn't even been a page created yet. Or for a dose of humour, I like to read how they spin real news, like Larry Craig (from Conservapedia):

On September 1, 2007, Craig announced he intended to resign from the Senate (effective September 30, 2007) after reports surfaced about an incident in June which he was arrested on a misdemeanor charge in a Minneapolis police airport sting operation in which Craig claimed entrapment.[1] Craig is a regular commuter through the Minneapolis airport. Given a choice of immediately going to jail to process a plea of innocence, Craig agreed to plea guilty so he could finish his final flight home

When you Google Conservapedia, you get this (popular sections):

Wikipedia
Jesus Christ
Debate Topics
Examples Of Wikipedia Bias Discussion
Homosexuality
Conservapedia:Commandments
Random page

organmeat @ 46:

Dr. Matt @ 11:

By comparison, here is the list of the top viewed wiki pages.

http://tinyurl.com/3cru3q

That is equally sad. I was hoping for wikipedia hits more grounded in reality.

Ahem, not exactly a glowing indictment on American "culture".

I'm as critical of the right as any leeberal, but couldn't it be said that at least some of those hits were made by the left who were curious about conservapedia's views of the subject matter?

This is obviously Lewis Black derived traffic. He made fun of this site on the Daily Show clip linked above. And the specific page he ridiculed was the one on Homosexuality. So there you go, most of Conservapedia's viewers are people who just watched Lewis Black make fun of their web site. That just says it all.

I hope Stephen Colbert is noticing this.

Not paying taxes, keeping their $$$ and impeaching Presidents for lying under oath about a Blow job. They do not seem to worry or consider impeaching for an intelligence snowjob that has resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths, injuries and millions of refugees. They have their priorities.

STOP REPUBLICAN PEDOPHILIA!

http://www.armchairsubversive.org/

I don't know, this link just seems to fit this thread for some reason. They're either searching for it, doing it, or killing themselves over it.

Wouldn't you have to be pretty well gay to be worried about Gay Bowel Syndrome?

Quick, somebody check with Larry Craig.

8. Gay Bowel Syndrome‎ [314,076]

Well, I'm glad somebody is chasing down info on this scourge of mankind. It would tend to put some intellectual teeth into the better known "wide-stance syndrome".

I'm surprised that "sex with animals" didn't make the list. I used to debate politics with a "conservative" Republican co-worker, and whenever the subject of legalized gay marriage would come up he would trot out the nonsensical argument that he would (at last!) be able to marry his dog. He would state this with such glee that I finally had to ask him if he had ever had sex with the animal.

Ah hello, most of these so called CONservatives are closet cases. Big time!

Is too much to hope that #11 was Homosexuality and getting us the fuck out of Iraq?

Obligatory: Shouldn't the term "santorum" be in there somewhere, named for the famous Republican "man on dog sex" senator?

Does this mean Larry Craig is thoroughly infested with Anal Parasites and might die soon? As opposed to all those senators who occasion the... er, back door during frisky night with the wife? And I'm sure those female D.C. hookers the half of the Repubs that AREN'T closet gays get busy with are just squeaky clean. Right?

Question: So, what’s up with conservative women? What do they see in these self-hating men who cannot, or will not, acknowledge their own sexuality?

The ideal Republican woman has no opinions, nor do they care about sexuality because sex is not for their enjoyment, understand? Hell, they don't even have claim to their own bodies.

Wow these folks really have an OCD towards homosexuality.

I think there are other more pressing issues to worry about then trying to change or condemn what people do behind closed doors.

Omg, that is hilarious.

It should be linked directly to the Conservapedia statistics link, however, where these results were found:

http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Statistics

Amazing, but what is real funny is their home page. They, being conservative and not
liking the whole 'you are your brother's keeper' philosophy had this passage from the
Bible posted...

“Two are better than one, because they have a good return for their work: If one falls down, his friend can help him up. But pity the man who falls and has no one to help him up!” † Ecclesiastes 4:9-10 (NIV)

Everything about conservatives is totally opposite of this Bible passage they post on their home page...
their ridiculousness never ceases to amaze me.

LMP @ 78:

This is patently dishonest. The counter doesn't distinguish between conservative and liberal computers who check into Conservapedia. The pages on homosexuality have been linked in many, many liberal blogs, where liberal bloggers obligingly click on them, thereby adding to the counter. What looks like Conservative obsession is nothing more than the results when these pages are linked for people to go laugh at.

I'd say at least half the results on that page belong to liberals.

But as usual, people who bring this story to you in C&L, Americablog, et al, and the people above who make comments assuming these results are not skewed in any manner, are typically dishonest. Think about it. Sheesh!

It's OK, Larry. We all believe you. No conservatives ever are, or ever were gay. Never. No sirree. Must be another case o' them libraal-media types.

You'd "say at least half the results on that page belong to liberals" because modern neocons think they can make up bullshit and call it fact. You have no basis to determine "half" are of ANY political persuasion.

So I could just as easily say that 90% of that traffic is closeted homosexual Republicans seeking fun things to do with George Bush's best buddy James Dale Guckert aka Jeff Gannon aka "Bulldog" (gay male prostitute), Ted Haggard (and his 40yr old meth-dealing man whore lover Mike Jones), and of course Larry "WIDE STANCE" Craig (NOT Foley, as he is a pedophile, rather than gay). But then there's also all the lesser Republicans, like Bob Allen of the Florida house, a Republican that followed an undercover officer into a nasty public park toilet and offered to PAY TO GIVE the cop a blowjob for $20! After getting ready go go down on the man, and getting busted, he stammered that he was FOLLOWED the cop into the bathroom becase the cop was a large black man, and he was so afraid that the first thing he thought of to say way, "Excuse me sir, I'm a racist, but I followed you in here to ask if I may fellate you if I pay you $20? Pretty please?" Or Glenn Murphy Jr. the National Chairman of the Young Republicans, that it appears is a serial fellatio ninja of sorts, that at least twice has confirmed that he would get fellow Young Republicans drunk enough to crash on his couch overnight so he could sneak back in the middle of the night and... you know, sneak a taste, I guess... until one woke during the covert op, and understandably freaked out.

Of course, the real reason most of these antics are creepy isn't the gay part, it is the fact that they're all gay bashers! They aren't like Michael Huffington, who just wanted to be a gay Republican without advocating violence and discrimination against gays. Heck most of them attempted to pay for sex, or even commit sex crimes against the will of another! Both illegal, of course. And again, Foley the pedophile along with most of the Republican leadership like former Speaker of the House (3rd in line to the presidency) Dennis Hastert that helped cover us Foley and protect him from prosecution for YEARS and YEARS while he was preying on young boys still in high school that were supposed to be in care of his authority (most of whom were not gay or remotely interested but cowed into sex games because of his position of power)!

They sure are laying a lot of log
cabin Republicans on a muddy foundation over there... I'm sure it's all a setup, all a coincidence, all a plot of everybody and their black helicopters against neocons... If it's that much easier to believe that a total hypocritical moral self-loathing and deceit of the entire Republican leadership then I guess their stuck with paranoia instead of reality...

It is starting to make the hypocrisy of regular massive rip-off schemes and bribes like Cheney, Duke Cunningham, Tom Delay, Ted Stevens, etc. look positively tame by comparison.

But I blame it all on the Clenis.

LMP @ 78:

This is patently dishonest. The counter doesn't distinguish between conservative and liberal computers who check into Conservapedia. The pages on homosexuality have been linked in many, many liberal blogs, where liberal bloggers obligingly click on them, thereby adding to the counter. What looks like Conservative obsession is nothing more than the results when these pages are linked for people to go laugh at.

I'd say at least half the results on that page belong to liberals.

But as usual, people who bring this story to you in C&L, Americablog, et al, and the people above who make comments assuming these results are not skewed in any manner, are typically dishonest. Think about it. Sheesh!

I confess. I spend all my spare time sabatoging Conservapedia, as I have absolutely nothing else to do. (Sheesh yourself @sshole.)

"Hunger is a bodily state that happens when one does not eat enough food. Hunger can lead starvation, and starvation can lead to death. Many people are hungry, though fewer people are hungry in capitalistic countries."

This is an actual quote from Conservapedia for "hunger". Not even grammatically correct. What, did a "liberal blogger" add this in too? This is really sad! They should at least TRY to be grammatically correct!

This link is to a parody of Bush’s mishandling of the war in Iraq.

What makes this especially bizarre is that (according to the logo on the screen)
it was produced by FOX.

WTF?

http://www.koreus.com/video/irack.html

This is why they don't have time to read the bills they pass.

We need a law that every bill brought before Congress must contain at least every other page of homosexual pornography.

At least then they'll look like they're reading the bills.

"Rarely is the question asked, is our conservatives learning?"
"A conservative DO learn!"
"You're working hard to put food on your conservatives!"

Since when has proper use of grammar or accurate information been a hallmark of the new conservatives? They elected this dillbag TWICE! Besides, although he says he's used "the Google" the neocons aren't so great on understanding the Internets (aka "series of tubes") -- the internet is about OTHER people. You know, like icky poor people 'n stuff. Why would Cheney's "go fuck yourself" crowd care about that (or anything outside of the bubble)?

Money