CNN: al Qaeda congratulates Obama on WI primary victory

To be fair, Anderson Cooper didn't actually say what the closed captioning stenographer thinks he did. But, c'mon. How many hearing-impaired Americans do you suppose are out there that think bin Laden called Senator Obama last night? The world may never know. What we do know is that this isn't the first time this "mistake" has been made.

icon Download | play icon Download | play Hi-Res RedLasso (click 'CC' icon in the top right.)

Here's CNN's contact info in case you want to let them know how you feel. As always, be polite:

One CNN Center, Box 105366, Atlanta, GA 30303-5366
Phone: 404-827-1500
Fax: 404-827-1906
E-mail: www.cnn.com/feedback



Login or Register to post comments.

224 comments

A new low!

Congratulations CNN!

Gotta love the librul media!

Anderson, is that Prada?

Corporate news at its best .... not . Shame on CNN. Telling lies since 1980.

All your votes are belong to us

I LOL'd

What did Al Qeada say about VICKY?

OK, breaking news - McCain was having an affair NYTimes breaking story!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?pagewanted=1...

Romney on a suicide watch.....

Mimi @ 8:

OK, breaking news - McCain was having an affair NYTimes breaking story!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?pagewanted=1...

Romney on a suicide watch.....

You beat me to it! LOL!!!!!!!!

Willy Horton also called, says thanks for letting him out of the pen.

Christmas has come early!!

Poor Cindy McCain - wonder if she is still proud? She should know once a cheater always a cheater.

So much for repub family values.

Yeah, but due to fisa expiring, we couldn't tape the cal!!!

The email link for leaving a response with CNN is not working, at least via my gmail account

Me too, Mimi and Dr. Matt.

Won't Fox be pissed at CNN, though? Misleading graphics (Larry Craig, D-Idaho, et cetera) is Fox's TURF. They invented that shit.

No wonder churches in Lower BooFoo, Tennessee think Obama wants to take the oath of office on the Koran. CNN ,,, a wholly owned subsidiary of Fox Noise!

Mimi, don't worry. Cindy is PROUD of her country.

And the McCain...uh...affair is "breaking news" on MSNBC? Just let me know if that spy sattelite is heading my way, thanks.

It's hard to believe this wasn't done on purpose by a right-wing stenographer. I mean, confusing Obama and Osama is one thing, since they're only different by one letter, but how does someone hear "Hillary Clinton" and transcribe it as "Al Qaeda"?

You really couldn't write this shit- noone would believe.

Correction CNN
It was Albert Kada A close personal friend of Obama calling to congratulate him

WTF?

I understand Cthulhu also dreamed himself in from his sunken tomb in R'Yleh. Wished Obama all the best. Told him it was really uplifting to know that this country had come so far. Then psychically exploded into Yog-Sothian gibberish when he/it saw the banner on the Anderson Cooper piece, which he was only watching because he finds Tucker Carlson to be an evil little midget who gives him bad dreams at night.

I agree with # 18 - no way this was an accident....perhaps someone was trying to "joke" and forgot to delete, but even so, that shows that they were being baised, unprofessional and unworthy of a job. Heads should roll for this and there better be a MAJOR X 10 retraction and apology every hour for the next week. - I'm not holding my breath.

Disgusting.

What bullshit. And why should we be any more polite than that asshole Glenn Beck that they have spewing for them? Why contact them at all, though. What will follow is the half-hearted apology, which just gives the story more legs and it becomes another urban legend that moronicons will believe and spread ad nauseum.

looks like cnn and fox have more than three letters in common.

This text is normally done by computer rather then have some one type them out, afaik. It's a funny/horrendous mistake, depending on what side of the fence you sit on.

I emailed CNN at the email address provided, and it was returned--I'll try again without the cnn. at the beginning, that's probably a mistake (a real one!).

Here's the email, I suggest rather than comment to the choir we each give CNN our 2 cents' worth:

I'm shocked to see your closed captioning substituted
"Al Qaeda" for "Hillary Clinton" describing her
congratulating Barack Obama not once but THREE times!

I saw the video on the website "Crooks and Liars" (www.crooksandliers.com). It
also posted links to TWO other such incidents; here
are the links:

http://rawstory.com/news/2006/CNN_comments_on_Obama_gaffe_in_0101.html

http://uploads.blip.tv/file/662626

I find the second one especially disturbing; who in
the world would considerate it good taste to suggest
that Barack Obama would point at Osam Bin Laden like a
supporter?

How many times do think even the most gullible among us will
believe these are "honest" mistakes rather than just
outrageous behavior!? I now consider CNN to be
a referent in the name of this website--you are truly Crooks
and Liars! I will be sure never to watch your "news"
program again and will be emailing this information
far and wide.

Disgusting, shameful, behavior.

these a-holes still had Repug strategist Amy Holmes listed as a "cnn contributer" on last nights election coverage.

I wrote to CNN using that email address but got it back with a "permanent error" message. Is there a better email address? This really is outrageous and I want to email them again but have it get through.

Bodan @ 26:

This text is normally done by computer rather then have some one type them out, afaik. It's a funny/horrendous mistake, depending on what side of the fence you sit on.

GIGO

CNN's computers do NOT type things on their own. If they're using speech recognition software, they really need to look into something that costs more than 25 cents. Al Qaeda and Hillary Clinton aren't even close.

it's amazing what desperation can do to the always 'cool' and unflappable establishment and man, i'm enjoying it! if barack obama can put a drop of sanity into this ridiculous episode...

Ok let's be perfectly clear about something. It wasn't a mistake. We all know that.
And anyone who thinks cnn is any better than faux hasn't been paying attention.

Email returned again, looks like you have to go to cnn.com/feedback.

Obama is an amateur. The only thing that would tempt me to vote for him is if Oprah gives me a car.

They will totally miss the John McCain story.

@eyeswideopen

www.cnn.com/feedback

I just sent them this:

Why does CNN keep printing in your closed captioning the phrase that "Al-Queda" called Obama to congratulate him on his primary victory? I've seen it twice now.

I expect to see a widely publicized retraction and apology for this completely unacceptable "mistake." If I don't see it within 24 hours, heavily publicized, I will block your channel on my set, and I will begin evaluating your advertisers and informing them that I find your "harmless" mistake absolutely unacceptable.

Thank you.

It's polite, but to the point. This is fucking bullshit.

yellow dog @ 30:

Bodan @ 26:

This text is normally done by computer rather then have some one type them out, afaik. It's a funny/horrendous mistake, depending on what side of the fence you sit on.

GIGO

CNN's computers do NOT type things on their own. If they're using speech recognition software, they really need to look into something that costs more than 25 cents. Al Qaeda and Hillary Clinton aren't even close.

GIGO?

I agree. I have seen mistakes happen from time to time, its when some one talks fast that the computer has a hard time translating it.

"Here’s CNN’s contact info in case you want to let them know how you feel. As always, be polite:"

I won't say a word.

…………………./´¯/)
………………..,/¯../
………………./…./
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`·¸
………./’/…/…./……./¨¯\
……..(’(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
………\……………..’.~./
……….\…………… _.·´
…………\…………..(
…………..\………….\..

I think today was the day that everybody took the gloves off.

Didn't even have to wait for the general election.

Clinton news network strikes again. Is it because the headquarters is located in Atlanta? Who was suspended? or fired? Who was the commercial sponsor who advertised right before or after the segment? We ought to pressure them - follow the money to pressure the boob or his bose behind the teleprompter.

Like Al Sharpton or Al Gore wouldnt have delivered enough outrage to the sub body temperature IQs in the viewing audience.

"CNN apologizes for Obama gaffe in Bin Laden graphic "
-and the 37 other "mistakes" they will make in the run up to the general election...

Andy @ 34:

Obama is an amateur. The only thing that would tempt me to vote for him is if Oprah gives me a car.

HAHA!
and YOU get a new car! and YOU get a new car!
priceless

xoites defends Constitution @ 39:

"Here’s CNN’s contact info in case you want to let them know how you feel. As always, be polite:"

I won't say a word.

…………………./´¯/)
………………..,/¯../
………………./…./
…………./´¯/’…’/´¯¯`·¸
………./’/…/…./……./¨¯\
……..(’(…´…´…. ¯~/’…’)
………\……………..’.~./
……….\…………… _.·´
…………\…………..(
…………..\………….\..

got'cha.
Very well done BTW...

Not mine, but i like it!

Off topic, but important breaking story from the NYT:
February 21, 2008
For McCain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk
By JIM RUTENBERG, MARILYN W. THOMPSON, DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK and STEPHEN LABATON
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?_r=4&hp=&ore...

"A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, in his offices and aboard a client’s corporate jet. Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself — instructing staff members to block the woman’s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity."

WTF is going on at CNN?

Have they just started making screw ups like foxnews or have they always made mistakes like this but C&L is only starting to report on them now?

Andy @ 34:

Obama is an amateur. The only thing that would tempt me to vote for him is if Oprah gives me a car.

Yes, these proffesional politicians are sooo cool!

"And we elect them again and again..."

Unless deaf folks think Al Qaeda has become a female senator from New York that regularly travels around the country I think they can figure out that they didn't really mean Al Qaeda.

Currently, it appears that CNN makes about 1/5th of the amount of mistakes that my local news team does.

Believe it or not, most mistakes are not veiled attempts to screw you over.

yellow dog @ 30:

Bodan @ 26:

This text is normally done by computer rather then have some one type them out, afaik. It's a funny/horrendous mistake, depending on what side of the fence you sit on.

GIGO

CNN's computers do NOT type things on their own. If they're using speech recognition software, they really need to look into something that costs more than 25 cents. Al Qaeda and Hillary Clinton aren't even close.

Yellow_dog do you actually know what kind of closed captioning (CC) system CNN uses?

There are two ways to produce live CC -- automated electronic and stenographers.

If it is automated, then you really can't blame CNN -- blame the software. I've used voice recognition software and it isn't that great (and let's face it -- Anderson Cooper is not the most easy to understand CNN reporter).

But if it is a stenographer, then that is clearly only one person's fault -- the stenographer. Why blame CNN?

My guess would be that they have hotkeys for certain often-used names -- like Hillary Clinton and Al-Qaeda. Seems very possible to mix up a hotkey combination. No stenographer is perfect (and this is the first time for a stenography error to be mentioned on CNN -- the other errors with with image captions and video).

Stevenovitch @ 50:

Unless deaf folks think Al Qaeda has become a female senator from New York that regularly travels around the country I think they can figure out that they didn't really mean Al Qaeda.

Currently, it appears that CNN makes about 1/5th of the amount of mistakes that my local news team does.

Believe it or not, most mistakes are not veiled attempts to screw you over.

Yeah, CNN makes about 1/5th the mistakes my local Al Qaeda team does as well.

Yeah that email is bouncing on my gmail...?

McCain on Thanksgiving: "Yes, I will have some more of that lemming stew. Is Michelle Omaba still proud of her country today? HAW HAW HAW."

Again, who's really surprised at American "news" media doing anything other than covering Britney and Lindsay hijinx and "beav" shots. That's why I watch the BBC.

A conspiracy of stenographers? If it's not this, it's the media (including Amy the Punditron) calling him "messianic." It's a sabotage, and it can't work!

Get real folks, this has nothing to do with the Clinton campaign and everything to do with the fact that the media is corporate and as such has a vested financial interest in the political fortunes of the Republican party. If you haven't followed the goings on at the FCC (and you probably haven't because the Corporate Media won't report it), Kevin Martin, the Republican head of that regulatory agency, is busily deregulating longstanding media ownership restrictions and forcing through a massive auctioning off of the new, soon to be forced down the public throat, digital broadcast spectrum. This means that the corporations that own the media can't afford (well, yes they could actually) to let Democrats control the FCC and ensure that this highly valuable public property is divided up fairly in the public interest.

Aren't CNN's CC systems computerized? Defending the MSM is rare with me, but this has got to be a glitch.

It's also time for them to retire this self - congratulating , slapping each other on the back promotion saying , " part of the best political team on television '; they do very little NEWS , and what news they do cover is predictable, Weather ; local fires ;local crime and constant SPECULATION ..more SPECULATION ....and the same tired , old questions .." Will it backfire" and repeating right wing talking points " some people say " " some people say" , just like CBS who went out of their way to explain McCain's " play book" with out pointing out Obama's valid criticism of McCain .

Just do the damn news CNN, is that so difficult .

The banner to me was an obvious SMEAR by association and the person who put it up , knows it . What's next , ...Lucifer sends a fruitcake to Obama .

sounds like whoever is typing the CC for CNN is a Hillary supporter..

Chris from Maine @ 60:

sounds like whoever is typing the CC for CNN is a Hillary supporter..

No, i would say a McCain Supporter.

steve davis @ 22:

I understand Cthulhu also dreamed himself in from his sunken tomb in R'Yleh. Wished Obama all the best. Told him it was really uplifting to know that this country had come so far. Then psychically exploded into Yog-Sothian gibberish when he/it saw the banner on the Anderson Cooper piece, which he was only watching because he finds Tucker Carlson to be an evil little midget who gives him bad dreams at night.

Inspired post, damn inspired...

onehandle @ 58:

Aren't CNN's CC systems computerized? Defending the MSM is rare with me, but this has got to be a glitch.

Glitches don't do Republican propaganda.

onehandle @ 58:

Aren't CNN's CC systems computerized? Defending the MSM is rare with me, but this has got to be a glitch.

It's one of hell of a glitch, then. If it's voice recognition software, maybe Harry Cranton called to congratulate, but al Queda?? If it's a "hot key" issue (as someone suggested) then the person typing and hitting those "hot keys" might need some new glasses. If it's a stenographer, can you type "fired"?

Why no retraction? Don't they watch their own broadcasts?

Does anyone remember any time in the history of the corporate media that such a mistake has happened to a Republican? If someone can point to some examples of these so called "mistakes" on the other side maybe I would believe that is really a simple case of error. I don't think anyone can find such "mistakes".

I'm practically speechless - and this isn't Faux Nuws?

I'm relatively optimistic that some of this is even now backfiring on re-PIG-licans. I don't think the population is as stupid as they wish they were.

But it is scary - their desperation is positively RANK in the air. One can't help but realize that they'll do ANYTHING to make Hillary the front-runner.

Obama!!! - WATCH YOUR BACK!!
*

RayC @ 65:

Does anyone remember any time in the history of the corporate media that such a mistake has happened to a Republican? If someone can point to some examples of these so called "mistakes" on the other side maybe I would believe that is really a simple case of error. I don't think anyone can find such "mistakes".

Good point, these "mistakes" are profoundly one sided. Anybody who doesn't recognize it is either being deliberately obtuse or is massively naive.

Trittydi @ 66:

I'm practically speechless - and this isn't Faux Nuws?

I'm relatively optimistic that some of this is even now backfiring on re-PIG-licans. I don't think the population is as stupid as they wish they were.

But it is scary - their desperation is positively RANK in the air. One can't help but realize that they'll do ANYTHING to make Hillary the front-runner.

Obama!!! - WATCH YOUR BACK!!
*

I understand that you hate filled people think all things evil come directly from the Clintons but just stop it. I am an Obama supporter but I have had it up to my eyeballs with the Clinton hate. The right wing has to take a back seat to the beating the Clintons get on progressive web sites.

BEWARE OF RIGHT WING REPUBLICAN "DIRTY TRICKS"!!

My response to CNN:

Dear CNN,

I noted on your Anderson Cooper segment, that while Anderson was saying one thing
your Closed Caption message was saying something totally different and very damaging to
the Senator from Illinois by connecting him to Osama Bin Ladin.

Is this some new kind of sinisterly tool CNN is going to use to press their idea of whom
they believe is the best candidate? Why not just give a script to Anderson and make
your plot complete. I mean, this was no mere "mistake" with a simple slip of words,
this is blatantly using your media to LIE to Americans about their potential next President.
I think when things get this far out of hand that apologies need to be made during Prime
Time.

I and my family will soon be putting your Station in the same category as FOX Network,
who have begun to look like the old Russian Pravda.

MSNBC is looking better every day.

Anybody who thinks that the corporate owners of CNN support either Democratic candidate hasn't been paying attention for the last 20 or 30 years. They'll use any and every psy-ops routine to sully either Democratic candidate. They need a Republican in the Presidency to assure their control of the FCC.

Jack Jett @ 35:

They will totally miss the John McCain story.

Im watching CNN right now and not a peep yet about John Insane.

Snowball @ 71:

Anybody who thinks that the corporate owners of CNN support either Democratic candidate hasn't been paying attention for the last 20 or 30 years. They'll use any and every psy-ops routine to sully either Democratic candidate. They need a Republican in the Presidency to assure their control of the FCC.

BINGO!! Exactly!

Xoites defends the lulz.

People. There is concerted effort to link Barack Obama with Osama bin Laden. These are not mistakes at all. When he becomes the nominee, be prepared for the ****storm.

What kind of a person watches CNN? CNN is shit.

From the looks of it you guys really think that CNN is engaged in a secret conspiracy to mislead the much coveted Deaf demographic into voting for Hillary Clinton by half-assedly suggesting that Obama got a call from Al Qaeda in such a way that anyone with a brain can figure out the mistake from the context alone? That this nefarious group has already supplanted any pretense of free thought and independent media such as this very blog, and yet can't seem to come up with a more effective plan than to randomly replace a single word every 6 months? If you're right, than Obama doesn't stand a chance anyway and you should all just give up now...

Karl Rove said to expect big surprises, well this is just the tip of the iceberg. The Republican party and the Corporate Media have long had a symbiotic relationship. It really started to kick into action during the Reagan regime when they eliminated the Fairness Doctrine. It then went full steam when Bill Clinton foolishly signed the 1996 Telecommunications Act. Now it's open psy-ops warfare against any public institution, political party or politician that might inhibit absolute corporate control of our political system.

janefromhell @ 74:

Xoites defends the lulz.

The figure skating jump? It needs defending? Has Bush shredded that too?

Stevenovitch @ 77:

From the looks of it you guys really think that CNN is engaged in a secret conspiracy to mislead the much coveted Deaf demographic into voting for Hillary Clinton by half-assedly suggesting that Obama got a call from Al Qaeda in such a way that anyone with a brain can figure out the mistake from the context alone? That this nefarious group has already supplanted any pretense of free thought and independent media such as this very blog, and yet can't seem to come up with a more effective plan than to randomly replace a single word every 6 months? If you're right, than Obama doesn't stand a chance anyway and you should all just give up now...

Thanks for trolling, now back to freeperland with you!

Hackerific!

Stevenovitch @ 77:

From the looks of it you guys really think that CNN is engaged in a secret conspiracy to mislead the much coveted Deaf demographic into voting for Hillary Clinton by half-assedly suggesting that Obama got a call from Al Qaeda in such a way that anyone with a brain can figure out the mistake from the context alone? That this nefarious group has already supplanted any pretense of free thought and independent media such as this very blog, and yet can't seem to come up with a more effective plan than to randomly replace a single word every 6 months? If you're right, than Obama doesn't stand a chance anyway and you should all just give up now...

That's right, because only Deaf people read the captions and the scrawl on the bottom of the screen.

The point isn't whether or not people can figure out the mistake. It is that 'mistake' is being made frequently, or at all.

Snowball @ 78:

Karl Rove said to expect big surprises, well this is just the tip of the iceberg. [...]

Yeah, it's going to get REALLY UGLY soon. This is just a extra-special sneak peak!

Fanon @ 82:

Stevenovitch @ 77:

From the looks of it you guys really think that CNN is engaged in a secret conspiracy to mislead the much coveted Deaf demographic into voting for Hillary Clinton by half-assedly suggesting that Obama got a call from Al Qaeda in such a way that anyone with a brain can figure out the mistake from the context alone? That this nefarious group has already supplanted any pretense of free thought and independent media such as this very blog, and yet can't seem to come up with a more effective plan than to randomly replace a single word every 6 months? If you're right, than Obama doesn't stand a chance anyway and you should all just give up now...

That's right, because only Deaf people read the captions and the scrawl on the bottom of the screen.

The point isn't whether or not people can figure out the mistake. It is that 'mistake' is being made frequently, or at all.

Presumably, anyone that can hear will know what Cooper actually said, but you're right, I forgot to mention the "watches political tv in a noisy bar" demographic.

The point isn't whether or not it's a "mistake" the point what the hell anyone would to accomplish by purposefully making such a "mistake".

Mimi @ 11:

Christmas has come early!!

Poor Cindy McCain - wonder if she is still proud? She should know once a cheater always a cheater.

So much for repub family values.

Are you kidding? As repub family values go, this is ULTRA-MEGA-MILD.

The steno phoned it in, Idol was on last night.

Obama must be the next President if the main terrorist wing of the CIA is calling to congratulate him...

...Oops, did I say that out loud?

KSH @ 84:

Snowball @ 78:

Karl Rove said to expect big surprises, well this is just the tip of the iceberg. [...]

Yeah, it's going to get REALLY UGLY soon. This is just a extra-special sneak peak!

Keep talking like that and you will be next. I can see it now:

"Snowball has no chance in hell!"

"Snowball linked to motorist's death on Interstate 95!"

Watch your back.

Stevenovitch @ 85:

Fanon @ 82:

Stevenovitch @ 77:

From the looks of it you guys really think that CNN is engaged in a secret conspiracy to mislead the much coveted Deaf demographic into voting for Hillary Clinton by half-assedly suggesting that Obama got a call from Al Qaeda in such a way that anyone with a brain can figure out the mistake from the context alone? That this nefarious group has already supplanted any pretense of free thought and independent media such as this very blog, and yet can't seem to come up with a more effective plan than to randomly replace a single word every 6 months? If you're right, than Obama doesn't stand a chance anyway and you should all just give up now...

That's right, because only Deaf people read the captions and the scrawl on the bottom of the screen.

The point isn't whether or not people can figure out the mistake. It is that 'mistake' is being made frequently, or at all.

Presumably, anyone that can hear will know what Cooper actually said, but you're right, I forgot to mention the "watches political tv in a noisy bar" demographic.

The point isn't whether or not it's a "mistake" the point what the hell anyone would to accomplish by purposefully making such a "mistake".

Converting the ignorant and misinformed, a rather large potential voting block.

Stevenovitch @ 85:

Fanon @ 82:

Stevenovitch @ 77:

From the looks of it you guys really think that CNN is engaged in a secret conspiracy to mislead the much coveted Deaf demographic into voting for Hillary Clinton by half-assedly suggesting that Obama got a call from Al Qaeda in such a way that anyone with a brain can figure out the mistake from the context alone? That this nefarious group has already supplanted any pretense of free thought and independent media such as this very blog, and yet can't seem to come up with a more effective plan than to randomly replace a single word every 6 months? If you're right, than Obama doesn't stand a chance anyway and you should all just give up now...

That's right, because only Deaf people read the captions and the scrawl on the bottom of the screen.

The point isn't whether or not people can figure out the mistake. It is that 'mistake' is being made frequently, or at all.

Presumably, anyone that can hear will know what Cooper actually said, but you're right, I forgot to mention the "watches political tv in a noisy bar" demographic.

The point isn't whether or not it's a "mistake" the point what the hell anyone would to accomplish by purposefully making such a "mistake".

You don't have a lot of right wing people in you family, do you? There are people who believe this crap b/c they saw it on the TEE VEE. The subtle re-inforcement, over time, can become psychologically effective. "Obama is a muslim", "he's going to take his oath on a Quran" and on and on and on. and oh, did we mention his middle name is Hussein?

Let's be clear, too, it's not a mistake, it's multiple mistakes.

The way I watch CNN is to have it on in the background and glance over at it when I can. And to watch it on MUTE when I'm on the phone. That sort of thing. The function of 24-hour cable news is to give lightning snippets, in part. If it wasn't deliberate, then how lax and irresponsible can a big fat important news channel get!? Do they need to hire more and better people? I could move to Atlanta.

Yeah, it was a 'mistake', sure...funny how that same "Obama/Osama" mistake keeps getting made over and over on TV news, and it is just a coincidence that trying to link Obama with fundy Islam terrorists is also a common right-wing smear of Obama, right?

So CNN is trying to dumb themselves down to the level of Faux News?

Anyone know if there still are "closed caption stenographers" or is that done by VR??

Let's be realistic. Obama scares the shit out of the right. He wants Universal Health Care, he wants to tax corporations who send jobs overseas. He wants the minimum wage to keep up with inflation, he wants to get out of Iraq in 2009, he wants to restore Habeas Corpus, and close Gitmo.

Very scary dude!

And he's black!

Otay @ 94:

So CNN is trying to dumb themselves down to the level of Faux News?

They have to move?

Also, what Fanon @ 91 said.

The mental reinforcement of an idea via constant repetition in as many places as possible is a favorite and familiar right-wing smear ploy. It doesn't matter what the context is or even if there is any context at all. Each instance doesn't even have to make any sense. The point is to repeat the key phrase/idea over and over, and linking Obama with Al-Qaida is a very common right-wing smear.

Fanon @ 91:

Stevenovitch @ 85:

Fanon @ 82:

Stevenovitch @ 77:

That's right, because only Deaf people read the captions and the scrawl on the bottom of the screen.

The point isn't whether or not people can figure out the mistake. It is that 'mistake' is being made frequently, or at all.

Presumably, anyone that can hear will know what Cooper actually said, but you're right, I forgot to mention the "watches political tv in a noisy bar" demographic.

The point isn't whether or not it's a "mistake" the point what the hell anyone would to accomplish by purposefully making such a "mistake".

You don't have a lot of right wing people in you family, do you? There are people who believe this crap b/c they saw it on the TEE VEE. The subtle re-inforcement, over time, can become psychologically effective. "Obama is a muslim", "he's going to take his oath on a Quran" and on and on and on. and oh, did we mention his middle name is Hussein?

Let's be clear, too, it's not a mistake, it's multiple mistakes.

Yes there have been multiple mistakes, the average time frame between them is 6 whole months. Typos are notoriously common mistakes, especially when people are typing something while thinking about something else, it's very common to type what you're thinking than what you actually should be typing.

No I don't have many right wingers in my family at all, but I daresay the level of stupidity you attribute to them probably does more to turn them off to progressive politics than any number of CNN typos.

xoites defends Constitution @ 89:

KSH @ 84:

Snowball @ 78:

Karl Rove said to expect big surprises, well this is just the tip of the iceberg. [...]

Yeah, it's going to get REALLY UGLY soon. This is just a extra-special sneak peak!

Keep talking like that and you will be next. I can see it now:

I have my own framing:

Snowball gathers mass as it rolls downhill.

"Snowball has no chance in hell!"

"Snowball linked to motorist's death on Interstate 95!"

Watch your back.

Johnny2Bad @ 95:

Anyone know if there still are "closed caption stenographers" or is that done by VR??

Uh, oh. There's this:

Real-time vs. Electronic Newsroom Captioning Technique

Real-time captioning typically uses stenographers to convert the entire audio portion of a live program to captions. Electronic newsroom captioning technique (ENCT) creates captions from a news script computer or teleprompter used for live newscasts. Because only material that is scripted can be captioned with this technique, breaking news, sports and weather updates, and live field reports are typically not captioned when ENCT is used.

Was it "ENCT" or "breaking news" ...off script?

Heh, my reply is in there somewhere.

Reading these fits of apoplexy have made my day.

People! It was "closed captioning". Just how many people saw it? Also what was the idiot trying to say that resulted in that particular closed caption. I would like to see any of you do on the fly closed captioning. My advice to all of you is grow up, sometimes a mistake is just a mistake.

Stevenovitch @ 99:

Fanon @ 91:

Stevenovitch @ 85:

Fanon @ 82:

Presumably, anyone that can hear will know what Cooper actually said, but you're right, I forgot to mention the "watches political tv in a noisy bar" demographic.

The point isn't whether or not it's a "mistake" the point what the hell anyone would to accomplish by purposefully making such a "mistake".

You don't have a lot of right wing people in you family, do you? There are people who believe this crap b/c they saw it on the TEE VEE. The subtle re-inforcement, over time, can become psychologically effective. "Obama is a muslim", "he's going to take his oath on a Quran" and on and on and on. and oh, did we mention his middle name is Hussein?

Let's be clear, too, it's not a mistake, it's multiple mistakes.

Yes there have been multiple mistakes, the average time frame between them is 6 whole months. Typos are notoriously common mistakes, especially when people are typing something while thinking about something else, it's very common to type what you're thinking than what you actually should be typing.

No I don't have many right wingers in my family at all, but I daresay the level of stupidity you attribute to them probably does more to turn them off to progressive politics than any number of CNN typos.

Get real, mistakes tend not to be so articulate.

Snowball @ 102:

Heh, my reply is in there somewhere.

I like your pitch. :)

Oh, and BTW, thanks for trolling.

eyeswideopen @ 29:

I wrote to CNN using that email address but got it back with a "permanent error" message. Is there a better email address? This really is outrageous and I want to email them again but have it get through.

Choose the "CNN.TV" icon, it goes to a page that lets you choose "Anderson Cooper 360" from among the other shows, then you write your message on their little clipboard thing and click "submit."

Stevenovitch @ 99:

Fanon @ 91:

Stevenovitch @ 85:

Fanon @ 82:

Presumably, anyone that can hear will know what Cooper actually said, but you're right, I forgot to mention the "watches political tv in a noisy bar" demographic.

The point isn't whether or not it's a "mistake" the point what the hell anyone would to accomplish by purposefully making such a "mistake".

You don't have a lot of right wing people in you family, do you? There are people who believe this crap b/c they saw it on the TEE VEE. The subtle re-inforcement, over time, can become psychologically effective. "Obama is a muslim", "he's going to take his oath on a Quran" and on and on and on. and oh, did we mention his middle name is Hussein?

Let's be clear, too, it's not a mistake, it's multiple mistakes.

Yes there have been multiple mistakes, the average time frame between them is 6 whole months. Typos are notoriously common mistakes, especially when people are typing something while thinking about something else, it's very common to type what you're thinking than what you actually should be typing.

No I don't have many right wingers in my family at all, but I daresay the level of stupidity you attribute to them probably does more to turn them off to progressive politics than any number of CNN typos.

No right wingers at all, well, lucky and unusual you. I guess I shouldn't have generalized that all right wing people will fall for that tacitc. But, then again, I guess you shouldn't have generalized and said that no one would. After all, there's still 26% of the population that supports GWB isn't there?

Ignore the fact that psy ops have been proven to work, time and again. Repeat something often enough and it will become believed, regardless of whether or not it's true. Look at something as simple as urban legends. If people were smart enough not to believe them, you wouldn't need a site like snopes.com, would you? (I actually just had a woman at work (a nurse!!!) repeat the gay man/gerbil story and insist that it was true.)

Snowball @ 106:

Oh, and BTW, thanks for trolling.

So many trolls and me with only ten fingers.

xoites defends Constitution @ 109:

Snowball @ 106:

Oh, and BTW, thanks for trolling.

So many trolls and me with only ten fingers.

didn't you mean "and me with only al Queda fingers"? Be careful what you type!

Stevenovitch @ 99:

Fanon @ 91:

Stevenovitch @ 85:

Fanon @ 82:

Presumably, anyone that can hear will know what Cooper actually said, but you're right, I forgot to mention the "watches political tv in a noisy bar" demographic.

The point isn't whether or not it's a "mistake" the point what the hell anyone would to accomplish by purposefully making such a "mistake".

You don't have a lot of right wing people in you family, do you? There are people who believe this crap b/c they saw it on the TEE VEE. The subtle re-inforcement, over time, can become psychologically effective. "Obama is a muslim", "he's going to take his oath on a Quran" and on and on and on. and oh, did we mention his middle name is Hussein?

Let's be clear, too, it's not a mistake, it's multiple mistakes.

Yes there have been multiple mistakes, the average time frame between them is 6 whole months. Typos are notoriously common mistakes, especially when people are typing something while thinking about something else, it's very common to type what you're thinking than what you actually should be typing.

No I don't have many right wingers in my family at all, but I daresay the level of stupidity you attribute to them probably does more to turn them off to progressive politics than any number of CNN typos.

I you also going to tell me that Bush never said that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11? He just used 9/11 and Iraq in every sentence in every speech. Is it the fault of 60% of Americans that they thought Iraq had something to do with 9/11? These "mistakes" work buddy.

xoites defends Constitution @ 109:

Snowball @ 106:

Oh, and BTW, thanks for trolling.

So many trolls and me with only ten fingers.

Of course, I wasn't referring to you Xiotes my friend.

Snowball @ 104:

Stevenovitch @ 99:

Fanon @ 91:

Stevenovitch @ 85:

You don't have a lot of right wing people in you family, do you? There are people who believe this crap b/c they saw it on the TEE VEE. The subtle re-inforcement, over time, can become psychologically effective. "Obama is a muslim", "he's going to take his oath on a Quran" and on and on and on. and oh, did we mention his middle name is Hussein?

Let's be clear, too, it's not a mistake, it's multiple mistakes.

Yes there have been multiple mistakes, the average time frame between them is 6 whole months. Typos are notoriously common mistakes, especially when people are typing something while thinking about something else, it's very common to type what you're thinking than what you actually should be typing.

No I don't have many right wingers in my family at all, but I daresay the level of stupidity you attribute to them probably does more to turn them off to progressive politics than any number of CNN typos.

Get real, mistakes tend not to be so articulate.

the text that showed:

Campaign ET KIT, We've just been told that Al Qaeda did indeed call Barrack to congratulate him on winning the call was made prior to her departing from ohio to new york, which means it was made after...

Aside from the numerous mistakes in there, it sounded like Cooper called him Barrack Comma. There's nothing particularly articulate about any of the mistakes in that Close Captioning...

RayC @ 111:

Stevenovitch @ 99:

Fanon @ 91:

Stevenovitch @ 85:

You don't have a lot of right wing people in you family, do you? There are people who believe this crap b/c they saw it on the TEE VEE. The subtle re-inforcement, over time, can become psychologically effective. "Obama is a muslim", "he's going to take his oath on a Quran" and on and on and on. and oh, did we mention his middle name is Hussein?

Let's be clear, too, it's not a mistake, it's multiple mistakes.

Yes there have been multiple mistakes, the average time frame between them is 6 whole months. Typos are notoriously common mistakes, especially when people are typing something while thinking about something else, it's very common to type what you're thinking than what you actually should be typing.

No I don't have many right wingers in my family at all, but I daresay the level of stupidity you attribute to them probably does more to turn them off to progressive politics than any number of CNN typos.

I you also going to tell me that Bush never said that Iraq had anything to do with 9/11? He just used 9/11 and Iraq in every sentence in every speech. Is it the fault of 60% of Americans that they thought Iraq had something to do with 9/11? These "mistakes" work buddy.

That's sort of my point: Bush said it often and loud, and everyone heard him. These "mistakes" happen every 6 months and a relatively small portion of the population sees them. If this is an attempt at association than it's extremely poor, and we don't need to worry that much.

How did they come up with al Qaeda, out of what Cooper said? It makes no sense that it was a mistake. Gee, it's so close to Hillary Clinton on my keypad! *snark!

I suppose there's a special macro for al Qeada all set up.

xoites defends Constitution @ 96:

Let's be realistic. Obama scares the shit out of the right. He wants Universal Health Care, he wants to tax corporations who send jobs overseas. He wants the minimum wage to keep up with inflation, he wants to get out of Iraq in 2009, he wants to restore Habeas Corpus, and close Gitmo.

Very scary dude!

And he's black!

I'm new here, so may be talking too often, but um, I think who Obama scares the shit out of is the ruling class in WASHINGTON, period. Including Pelosi, Reid. The "establishment" is virtually synonymous with what you term "the right." I didn't used to think so. I do now.

has everyone read the "Chicken Doves" article in Rolling Stone?
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/18349197/the_chicken_doves

Snowball @ 115:

How did they come up with al Qaeda, out of what Cooper said? It makes no sense that it was a mistake. Gee, it's so close to Hillary Clinton on my keypad! *snark!

your keyboard look this?

Err, i mean your keyboard look like this?

Are you effing kidding me??

Jeebus....CNN: YOU SUCK!

It is also interesting that a lot of you are willing to hang CNN, but are also willing to forgive and forget Michelle for what could be interpreted as an insulting "slip of the tongue". Sometimes a mistake is just a mistake.

Stevenovitch
That made me think of something you wrote earlier. That it is typical to make typos when typing and thinking of something else. You are stenoing a live news broadcast, should you really be thinking of something else? If that's the case, I hope this same stenographer doesn't do any murder trials. ;)

Well no, but I'll just bet the difference between the shorthand version of Hillary Clinton and al Qaeda are pretty extreme. Want to put money on it?

Fanon @ 122:

Stevenovitch
That made me think of something you wrote earlier. That it is typical to make typos when typing and thinking of something else. You are stenoing a live news broadcast, should you really be thinking of something else? If that's the case, I hope this same stenographer doesn't do any murder trials. ;)

That's a good point, but keep in mind that stenographers that can transcribe in real time are a rare commodity and highly paid. Also, keep in mind that what they type into the keyboard is translated by a computer from shorthand to actual english. I mean, the potential for mistakes is infinite, and real time transcribers aren't the type of employee that you can just fire and get a new one the next day.

E_I @ 75:

People. There is concerted effort to link Barack Obama with Osama bin Laden. These are not mistakes at all. When he becomes the nominee, be prepared for the ****storm.

When the aholes in the MSM try and pull this shit during the election they might think twice when there are a 1,000 angry people surrounding their studios demanding the heads of the pundits.

Fanon @ 122:

Stevenovitch
That made me think of something you wrote earlier. That it is typical to make typos when typing and thinking of something else. You are stenoing a live news broadcast, should you really be thinking of something else? If that's the case, I hope this same stenographer doesn't do any murder trials. ;)

Gee, you don't suppose that's why court stenographers now have recordings to check their work.

The Gettysburg Address

(With Closed Captioning provided by CNN)

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new tax, conceived by Move On, and dedicated to the proposition that all jobs are exportable.

Now we are cutting and running from a great civil war, testing whether that notion, or any notion so conceived and so deligated, can long insure. We are met on a Great Britain of that lore. We have come to a delicate a portion of that meal, as a final resting place for those who here have fallen asleep that that nation might die. It is altogether fitting and fixture that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not predicate -- we can not consumate -- we can not shallow -- this round. The brave men, living and dead, who smuggled here, have consentrated it, far above our solar power to add or subtract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what was mistated here. It is for us the reading, rather, than the listening to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which these typos have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from this misinformation we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve to vote for the candidate of corporate choice -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of slavery -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall perish from the earth.

Carly Corday @ 117:

xoites defends Constitution @ 96:

Let's be realistic. Obama scares the shit out of the right. He wants Universal Health Care, he wants to tax corporations who send jobs overseas. He wants the minimum wage to keep up with inflation, he wants to get out of Iraq in 2009, he wants to restore Habeas Corpus, and close Gitmo.

Very scary dude!

And he's black!

I'm new here, so may be talking too often, but um, I think who Obama scares the shit out of is the ruling class in WASHINGTON, period. Including Pelosi, Reid. The "establishment" is virtually synonymous with what you term "the right." I didn't used to think so. I do now.

has everyone read the "Chicken Doves" article in Rolling Stone?
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/18349197/the_chicken_doves

I don't care how new you are. If you have something to say, please say it.

Stevenovitch @ 124:

Fanon @ 122:

Stevenovitch
That made me think of something you wrote earlier. That it is typical to make typos when typing and thinking of something else. You are stenoing a live news broadcast, should you really be thinking of something else? If that's the case, I hope this same stenographer doesn't do any murder trials. ;)

That's a good point, but keep in mind that stenographers that can transcribe in real time are a rare commodity and highly paid. Also, keep in mind that what they type into the keyboard is translated by a computer from shorthand to actual english. I mean, the potential for mistakes is infinite, and real time transcribers aren't the type of employee that you can just fire and get a new one the next day.

I can concede that the potential for mistakes is high. However, if Harry Cranton had called to congratulate Obama, that would make sense. Any comibination of those letters and syllables in HRC would make sense. To be so far off the mark as to type al queda begs the question of whether the mistake was intentional or not, doesn't it?

Stevenovitch @ 124:

Fanon @ 122:

Stevenovitch
That made me think of something you wrote earlier. That it is typical to make typos when typing and thinking of something else. You are stenoing a live news broadcast, should you really be thinking of something else? If that's the case, I hope this same stenographer doesn't do any murder trials. ;)

That's a good point, but keep in mind that stenographers that can transcribe in real time are a rare commodity and highly paid. Also, keep in mind that what they type into the keyboard is translated by a computer from shorthand to actual english. I mean, the potential for mistakes is infinite, and real time transcribers aren't the type of employee that you can just fire and get a new one the next day.

So you're saying that someone with a position like that is a highly trained professional. Hardly likely they could confuse al Qaeda with Hillary Clinton.

New Vera City @ 126:

Fanon @ 122:

Stevenovitch
That made me think of something you wrote earlier. That it is typical to make typos when typing and thinking of something else. You are stenoing a live news broadcast, should you really be thinking of something else? If that's the case, I hope this same stenographer doesn't do any murder trials. ;)

Gee, you don't suppose that's why court stenographers now have recordings to check their work.

Gee, you don't suppose you left your sense of humor somewhere, do you?

At least his base is keeping in touch.

Or Harry Cranton, for that matter.

New Vera City @ 121:

It is also interesting that a lot of you are willing to hang CNN, but are also willing to forgive and forget Michelle for what could be interpreted as an insulting "slip of the tongue". Sometimes a mistake is just a mistake.

Well, I'll only speak for myself and say that I am annoyed with CNN because this has been a pattern of behavior for awhile now. No, not as egregious, boorish, juvenile and disgusting as FalseNoise Channel which SUPER-sucks, but grating nonetheless.

Ok, fine. I will be more fair:
Hey, CNN! This one lame-assed gaff! Attsamattayou, eh???

But I am curious about Michelle's slip of the tongue. Can you refresh my memory (I may have just missed it altogether)?

Snowball @ 133:

Or Harry Cranton, for that matter.

Heyyyyy, leave Harry out of this!

Fanon @ 129:

Stevenovitch @ 124:

Fanon @ 122:

Stevenovitch
That made me think of something you wrote earlier. That it is typical to make typos when typing and thinking of something else. You are stenoing a live news broadcast, should you really be thinking of something else? If that's the case, I hope this same stenographer doesn't do any murder trials. ;)

That's a good point, but keep in mind that stenographers that can transcribe in real time are a rare commodity and highly paid. Also, keep in mind that what they type into the keyboard is translated by a computer from shorthand to actual english. I mean, the potential for mistakes is infinite, and real time transcribers aren't the type of employee that you can just fire and get a new one the next day.

I can concede that the potential for mistakes is high. However, if Harry Cranton had called to congratulate Obama, that would make sense. Any comibination of those letters and syllables in HRC would make sense. To be so far off the mark as to type al queda begs the question of whether the mistake was intentional or not, doesn't it?

I guess I just don't know enough, but I have no idea how far apart the keystrokes for Hillary Clinton and Al Qeada are on a stenotype. But I'm also thinking that if a computer is translating from shorthand to english, they obviously have some predefined words programmed in there, because I don't think it's like that such software would automatically recognize a word Al Qaeda, that's just speculation though.

You're right it does beg the question, and I'd be right there with you if this was happening every day, or even every other day, but beyond that I think I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.

Come on people that's fake.

I'd believe it if they typed Lamont Cranston instead of al Qaeda. That, at least, is within unreasonable parameters of Hillary Clinton.

The Snowball Knows what evil lurks in the hearts of stenographers.
Muuuhhhaahaahha!

Derry @ 137:

Come on people that's fake.

hah! That would be funny if I got my hackles up over nada!

Just why should we continue to be polite? How many typos, mistakes, misspellings, and innuendos does anybody need? Just asking. I do this kind of work everyday, and if I was that bad at my job (and made the kind of money they pay at CNN) I would have been fired years ago. Give me a break.

Derry @ 137:

Come on people that's fake.

Is it really? Do tell.

How do you know?

Remember, this is not a caption for the rest of us.

Where do I begin?
Ah, fuck it.......where's my beer
>
>
>seriously though

Don't the wingnuts call CNN the Clinton News Network? Gee, sometimes I think they might finally be right about something.....

xoites defends Constitution @ 141:

Derry @ 137:

Come on people that's fake.

Is it really? Do tell.

How do you know?

Remember, this is not a caption for the rest of us.

It looks fake to me. I don't know what the hell it is.

Derry @ 144:

xoites defends Constitution @ 141:

Derry @ 137:

Come on people that's fake.

Is it really? Do tell.

How do you know?

Remember, this is not a caption for the rest of us.

It looks fake to me. I don't know what the hell it is.

It is closed captioning for the hearing impaired.

xoites defends Constitution @ 145:

Derry @ 144:

xoites defends Constitution @ 141:

Derry @ 137:

Is it really? Do tell.

How do you know?

Remember, this is not a caption for the rest of us.

It looks fake to me. I don't know what the hell it is.

It is closed captioning for the hearing impaired.

It is really? Do tell.

How do you know? Are you a sexual intellectual?

Yes, i am.

How many "mistakes" does it take for people to perceive a pattern?

Promoting segment on Obama, Hardball displayed a photo of bin Laden
http://mediamatters.org/items/200802190002?f=s_search

Still not funny: CNN again associates Obama with bin Laden
http://mediamatters.org/items/200802120007?f=s_search

Wash. Post's Bacon reported only Obama's denials of madrassa smear, not media debunkings
http://mediamatters.org/items/200711290005?f=s_search

He's a real Nowhere Man ...
http://mediamatters.org/altercation/200711290004

Oh, I could go on, but why bother?

xoites defends Constitution @ 147:

Yes, i am.

LMAO Sexual intellectual = fucking know-it-all

I know several captioners and am fairly familiar with what and I have never seen captioning in this format like this on screen. It looks like someone faked this.

Regardless, there can be times that a a captioner has single stroke method to say one long phrase, so a errant stroke can display the wrong words. They are listening and typing at an incredible rate for up to several hours at a time, the friggin newscasters are reading script way to fast or talking over each other. I seriuosly doubt this was done on purpose so lighten up people, not everything is a conspiracy against Obama or Hillary.

224 comments

Login or Register to post comments.