McCain to visit with the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
By Steve Benen Thursday Mar 06, 2008 5:50pmUsually, political groups trip over one another to try and gain public notoriety and attention. The Council for National Policy, meanwhile, would be perfectly happy if the public didn’t even know it exists. (I’ve long believed the easiest job on Earth would be to serve as this group’s press secretary.)
The CNP is made up of many heavy-hitters from the religious right and conservative movement in general, and they meet periodically to plot and scheme. It may sound excessively cloak-and-dagger of the group, but the CNP has a list of formal rules, one of which reads, “The media should not know when or where we meet or who takes part in our programs, before or after a meeting.”
Fortunately, details routinely leak. Today in New Orleans, for example, the CNP will gather and hear from none other than John McCain. (You know, the one who “refuses to pander” to anyone.)
Sen. John McCain, in his post-victory debut before the conservative movement’s top donors and leaders, will address the Council for National Policy’s annual winter meeting here today.
His remarks at the event, which has always been closed to the public and will have only a partial accommodation of the press this year for the first time, could turn out to be his make-or-break pitch for support from some of the right’s most influential critics of his past positions and policies.
“This is the most distinguished collection of conservative leaders and donors, and he was anxious to appear as part of his ongoing effort to consolidate support for his candidacy within the conservative movement,” said Charlie Black, Mr. McCain’s campaign adviser.
And who, exactly, is the Council for National Policy? Right Wing Watch has some good background info.
Login or Register to post comments.
In what many in the GOP came to view as the 11th Commandment, Ronald Reagan famously said," Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican." Hillary Clinton, it would now appear, is taking his advice to heart. Not content to merely lambast the supposed inexperience of Barack Obama, Clinton's scorched-earth campaign has lavished praise on John McCain as the embodiment of a commander-in-chief. Desperate to resurrect her once-fading candidacy, it is Hillary Clinton who has sadly emerged as the embodiment of Reagan's Law.
For the details, see:
"Hillary Clinton Follows Reagan's 11th Commandment."
Fascists, meet Theocrats; Theocrats, meet Fascists.
God, I hate these rich asshats. They are worthless and a drag on society. Blaming the poor is how they hide the fact that they are ones who take all the money. There must be some way to force them to be productive members of society. Maybe a program like the CCC to put them to work repairing the infrastructure. The only time they are allowed to tell other people what to do is around the campfire after a 12 hour day of making little ones out of big ones.
Or maybe just a revolution. Who's up for storming the AIE?
The end of U.S. dominance — not by Commies or terrorists…
But hari-kari via our own government.
Wudda thunk it?
Well, if that CNP thing doesn't work out for him, there's always that meeting down in the bunker that's been haunting my nightmares lately: What George Bush and John McCain said on their way down to the bunker to meet with Dick Cheney.
Kinda sounds like another group of zanies in 1920's Germany which went on to later fame trying to conquer world as the Hitler's Nazi Party.
These fucking people are traitors to the principles of what this country was founded on.
As Indiana Jones put it so well, "I Hate Nazis".
AngryOne @ 1:
I am hopeful that with each new cheap shot (see todays suggestion that obamas entire campaign is a big lie, and only the foreign press has been let in on it), there are fewer and fewer able to see a halo hovering over Clinton's head; and those remaining are forced to close their eyes, cover their ears, and insist that hillary is "the one" whatever is happening in the world, however dishonest her campaign becomes.
ohio progressive @ 7:
I didn't see the Clinton's forcing war, death, debt and economic devastation down everyones throats during the 90's.
Anyone else?
Why do I get the feeling that naked and frightened young boys would likely be forced to entertain these people?
L.A. Confidential @ 8:
No sir, I didn't see the Clintons forcing any of that down anyone's throat.
Nor did I suggest any such thing....
You are obtuse.
ohio progressive @ 10:
I don' get your drift. What do you want from life?
ashton @ 9:
First I laughed out loud-then I got the same creepy feeling.
David Hawes @ 12:
...how long before Gary Bauer gets caught in a bathroom stall doing the craig dance....
another fun loving reichwingnut christian fucked-up group
and the sad thing is (before I and others were banned from DKos) is that the anti-HRC people were warning about her big time, there were better other candidates as well as Obama.
She is dangerous, its a power at all costs and to hell with everybody else thing with her.
Dkos (and it seems the Democrat party) has more than its quota of late-middle aged 'women' who dote on cats and dashing young things in uniforms and glorious sanitized TVed overseas wars.
HRC to me seems to be a vanity presidential candidate, being the wife of a popular ex-president doesnt make her the saviour,
and doing the bush-lite thing will not repair the damage done by 8 years of Chimpy &co.
She needs to stop doingt he Republicans dirty work and remember that being president is only a job, a big job but not the 'be all and end all', getting a democratic government back in power and repairing the US is the critical thing for 08.
Do not do the Rethugs job for them Hillary.
Bush to veto bill banning waterboarding AP - 8 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - The White House says President Bush will veto legislation on Saturday that would have barred the CIA from using waterboarding — a technique that simulates drowning — and other harsh interrogation methods on terror suspects.
AmerrrrrriKa AmerrrrriKa God shed his Grace on ThEeEeEee
ferrofluid @ 15:
What I wonder about is why you Obamanians hate older Americans.
ohio progressive @ 13:
Awww.Jest kids havin fun.
ashton @ 9:
because they are republicans,
republicans do as republicans want,
and they bury the evidence before is starts smelling.
L.A. Confidential @ 17:
Funny, I was just gonna ask why you Hillary Halo people hate younger americans...
after all, that was her strongest point in the last several weeks-- obama is too young to be president, and your kids will suffer for it..
i haven't heard barack say hillary is too old......but maybe now that you raise the argument...
Text of McCain speech:
"Listen up, you fucking thieving, power hungry, Mammon-worshiping, whores: It's either me, the slut, or the darkie. I expect you to donate accordingly, and I want you to take back all that shit you said about me, before. Got it? Praise Jesus. Amen, brothers."
Only this group of narrow-minded, power-obsessed, money-hungry, elitist assholes could come to my devastated city to discuss anything but how to improve the conditions of my city. Yeah, and the presidential debate committee still claims the decision not to hold one of the debates here was strictly a matter of New Orleans' "not being ready" to host this type of major event. Whatever. In the last year New Orleans has hosted large public events of increasingy size and complexity with little to no public safety incidents: the Arena Bowl, the Sugar Bowl, the BCS Championship and the NBA All-Star Game, which begs the question: who's really not ready to have a debate here? So what city gets to cash in on hosting one of the debates? Oxford, Mississpippi, of course - adopted hometown of William Faulkner and, of course, a small town with average convention facilities in a state with a well-connected Republican governor who just happens to have been a tobacco lobbyist prior to running for office. But, again, we must remember that the decision was not political. (For the record, seven past & present presidential candidates signed letters to the committee requesting that one of the debates be held in New Orleans: Joseph Biden, Sam Brownback, Hillary Clinton, Christopher Dodd, John Edwards, John McCain and Barack Obama.)
Anyway, this reminds me of the way the NRA seems to hold rallies in cities recently affected by gun-toting mass murderers, as if they want to make the pain worse. I wish I believed in a hell because it would put a big, fat smile on my face knowing these scumbags would be taking the A-Train straight there as soon as they kicked the bucket.
David Hawes @ 18:
But,but He's gtta knife! That's noat a noife THAT's a noife!
L.A. Confidential @ 8:
I didn't see the Clinton's forcing war, death, debt and economic devastation down everyones throats during the 90's.
Anyone else?
No, we just had to take NAFTA, welfare reform, no healthcare(which they were going to get and 8 years later. nothing) Then of course, we had Travelgate. Filegate, Monicagate, Jennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Whitewater, Fostergate, Ken Starr, Inpeachment, a Republican Congress, and some I am sure I have missed.
Can anyone get through to Obama and Clinton that there are great oportunities to attack McCain, not each other?
ohio progressive @ 20:
isnt it part of the bush-lite baby boomer creed to grab all you can and to hell with everybody else.
The baby boomers are for anything which is relevant to their generation until their generation goes beyond that point.
then its onto the next must have point, the big scare about pensions these days, health care for kids who cares.
The dark forces are gathering down in NOLA. Where's Marie LaVeaux when we need her?
to take a socialist progressive democrat thinking perspective, you establish a level playing field safety net,
beyond this nobody falls, and everybody has enough to eat and minimal health care and a chance to get a job.
Luxuries and consumer goods are earnt as most people would think is proper, but a basic decent standard of living for people is a basic right.
Negative growth next 4 to 6 months.
ferrofluid @ 29:
That's pinkocommie thinking. But very true.
SassySandy @ 25:
No, we just had to take NAFTA, welfare reform, no healthcare(which they were going to get and 8 years later. nothing) Then of course, we had Travelgate. Filegate, Monicagate, Jennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Whitewater, Fostergate, Ken Starr, Inpeachment, a Republican Congress, and some I am sure I have missed.
That does it. I will definately not be voting for Bill Clinton this November.
Ex Prime minister Tony Blair for all his smarmyness did one very good thing in the UK in the late 90s,
he established the minimum that was considered decent to live on, upping the minimum wage and getting the family credit schem working, so that families would have a guiaranteed 250 UKP to live on per week.
Britain and its economy did not collapse into a socialist mess (as predicted by republicans) and its economy and people are thriving.
ferrofluid @ 27:
IMO, the concerns about pensions are legit. People worked for that money- pensions are simply wages deferred until , roughly, retirement.
And I think you're making an "or" argument that isn't there. It's not "Pensions OR SCHIP".
I think that the pension concerns cross party lines. There are a lot of Red and Blue voters who would be harmed if their pensions went *POOF*. Children's Healthcare seems to be divided along politically, not age-related, fault lines, however.
L.A. Confidential @ 8:
No. They just fucked the party raw and left it ripe for the picking in 2000.
David Hawes @ 31:
I wonder what would happen to the average republican's ickle mind if they knew that jebus was a commie back in the day.
ferrofluid @ 33:
Amazing! Give the peasents something to Live for and the economy grows! Brilliant!
David Hawes @ 31:
Goldman Sachs Morgan Stanley Citigroup Lehman Brothers JP Morgan would leave out the But Very True part.
slippy hussein toad @ 35:
you mean the stolen election?
Andy K @ 34:
Theres enough Congresscritters in both houses to move important bills covering all the major topics through at the same time,
cowardice and other things stops it in reality, lobbyists whips and skeletons keeps the important stuff off the books.
ashton @ 32:
Don't come crying to me when McCain steps into the drivers seat.
ferrofluid @ 33:
And this didn't create a sense of entitlement in Britain? Surely this unleashed an entire decade of nothing but welfare queens driving around in Cadil...er..Jaguars.
L.A. Confidential @ 38:
Yup. Facists always hate commies.
L.A. Confidential @ 41:
I will try to restrain myself.
clinton-bush= good cop-bad cop. they work for the same team.
L.A. Confidential @ 41:
This is why so many progressives, including Feingold and other Obama supporters, are concerned about the corrupt efforts of the Clinton camp to dishonestly win the nomination.
If she is successful, she'll be handing the whitehouse over to mccain
that's why, as so many hillary halo people are claiming, we are crying now....
....it's a done deal if she wins by cheating, now, we lose honestly in november
ashton @ 42:
god yes, wall to wall traffic jams comprising nothing but rollers, jags, cadis and C5s.
ohio progressive @ 46:
and 130 million goes into the bank account.
Treasury and Wall Street boyz better load up on methedrine. It's going to be a sleepless weekend. And Monday is going to get here fast.
thats Sinclair C5s btw, not Citroens or Galaxys.
From the link:
Okay, what's the big secret they're keeping? We all know what their separate agendas are, I think we all suspect what they're aiming at in unison.
No, we know what they're trying to do. These are the same people who've been pulling the strings of the GOP puppet show for the last 20 or 30 years.
So what's the secret? A meth-fueled orgy with illegal immigrant boys? What?
L.A. Confidential @ 49:
Highrollers who don't pay up on thier marks eventually swim with the fishes. I have ZERO sympathy.
ferrofluid @ 48:
and 130 million goes into the bank account.
Don't forget the 7 Trillion the cons put in their bank account without anyone noticing. All 300 of them.
David Hawes @ 52:
monday will be a cakewalk, nobody is fretting
David Hawes @ 52:
May be an upswing in cons jumping out of windows at some point I suspect. Be good for the street cleaners and trash haulers to get some additional overtime though.
ohio progressive @ 54:
Sure is your holding a massive short position order the bubbly.
ferrofluid @ 40:
Well, I disagree.
I know what happened with SCHIP- it passed both the Senate and House and was vetoed by Stupor Mundi. Not enough Republicans voted to override the veto.
I don't know where pension legislation stands now in Congress, but it wouldn't surprise me that if it was introduced the same thing would happen here as with the SCHIP legislation.
And that's not lobbying. That's partisan politics with the White House holding just enough power to sway a handful of Congress-people and defeat legislation that the White House opposes along philosophical lines.
L.A. Confidential @ 55:
Yeah.Crumbs for the peasents but good work if you can get it. ...BTW,I've paid cash for everything for 30 years. I may be poor but I have No Debt. So who's the better?
David Hawes @ 58:
I won't expect to see you falling outside my office window.
I will wave and smile at the cons that do though.
L.A. Confidential @ 59:
Nope.Got No wings. BUT If they need a push,I'm right behind em LMAO
The Clintons had the Democratic Party so exhausted from having to defend them for 8 years, we could not even put up a good fight in 2000. Everytime I hear someone mention Obama as Clintons VP, I think about Al Gore. Once she gets done, its over for Obama. He better not take that deal.
David Hawes @ 60:
Hey there ya go! We can team up. Excuse me Sir, you need a push? No Charge! LOL Love it.
David Hawes @ 60:
Hey LA- You got smart things to say. I know I'm rough sometimes,but I Love the commenters here. Well,most of em.
L.A. Confidential @ 62:
Absolutely Free! And none of that 'No Risk'crap.
SassySandy @ 61:
If Obama can't get tough and beat Hillary he's not going to stand a chance against the Machine.
Al Gore wouldn't touch This Mess with a thousand mile pole.
David Hawes @ 64:
LOL. Unconditional guarantee also that "Bush will save me" won't work approaching the pavement.
L.A. Confidential @ 67:
I'm flyinngggSplat
You uys crack me up. The 'rich' are the problem ? When did the USA become a wealth re-distribution state ? You guys need to et a grip and realize that the 'rich pay 80% 0f all income taxes paid (ALL INCOME TAXES PAID) and just thank them, instead of thinking about all you should have done/could have one to become one of them. Jealus losers! Th "rih" made this country great...all you guys do is drin the economy.
David Hawes @ 63:
Thanks it's appreciated. I appreciate your wit, insight, and common sense also.
frozen @ 69:
Hmmm.Another poor educated asshole heard from.
frozen @ 69:
Melanie? Is that you?
L.A. Confidential @ 70:
Ok but this don't mean we're gonna share warm showers in the morning LMAO
L.A. Confidential @ 72:
Need to back off those adult beverages a little while your on the computer babe.
L.A. Confidential @ 74:
Umm. Last time I knew China was paying our taxes.
David Hawes @ 73:
NO WAY!!!!!! Forget it!!!!! LOL
L.A. Confidential @ 76:
Just a Clint Eastwood quote.
Gotta Go. Peace.
David Hawes @ 75:
While the Feds are shearing x-billions of losses off the top of their blankets and re-attaching x-billions of new debt onto the bottom.
David Hawes @ 78:
Later
Oh look, another LAcon hijacked thread.
Hillary is done. Her square = circle math is the same shell game the thugs pulled in 2000.
Her "I am vetted" claims are pure BS. Where the fuck are her tax returns? Hillary is just as secretive as Cheney, if not more.
blue balls @ 81:
Highjacked? You came late to the dance,bub. These threads are for all of US.
L.A. Confidential @ 65:
Point made and taken
Well, I have found hell....... or at least the democrat part of it....does anyone here speak Republican ? Or can are ya'll not supposed to talk with your hands out ?
do they open the meeting by throwing puppies over a cliff ? , u know in support of the troops .
frozen @ 84:
Go back to Town Hall and all will be well. Are You slummin with the heathen,or just an [Deleted. Yeah, you didn't exactly call anyone anything, but you are so close I can taste it. Stop it with the name calling. NOW! Site Monitor] ?
frozen @ 87:
OK Forgiven.
David Hawes @ 86:
Sorry site. I'll behave.
David Hawes @ 89:
I was just confused by the syntax/gammer.
[Thank you. Site Monitor]
Am watching something about Haggee on pbs god these people are sooooooo out of touch and that makes them soooo scary. I have a question what would jesus say about all the hate they show towards the other? If there were to be a rapture they will not make the cut. They talk about islamicfascists don't they see that they are a flip side of what they rail about? If they are soo against what is happening in the mideast maybe they should take up arms and fight that last great battle and get it over with and leave those of us that have no dog in this fight alone.
Mcwar courted their endorsement my god war for 100 years my ear war forever no country can substain a neverending war
David N @ 85:
It's not to support the troops it's to support the contractors and friends of the military/industrial complex the support the troops is just a cover. we see how they support the troops by their actions when they come home or more like if they come home
ohio progressive @ 7:
Polls have her leading in Penn by 15%. Apparently the American people like that kind of crap.
David Hawes @ 90:
I admit I get out of line,sometimes. I need to let My brain get before My fingers. Ahhhh. But it IS tough sometimes when You and I know some certain commenter is an.....But. I will abide. This is a wonderful site and I would hate to be banished. You do good work.
unsurebtwilling @ 92:
ah , right you are . The light at the end of the tunnel is really an on coming train .
they don't open the meeting by throwing puppies off the cliff, but they do look for the democrats cowering behind their desks.
ferrofluid @ 15:
OH MY, Where does one begin?
Lets start here: has more than its quota of late-middle aged 'women' who dote on cats and dashing young things in uniforms and glorious sanitized TVed overseas wars. shall we?
This really takes the cake. No wonder you got kicked off of DKOS. I rarely go over there but maybe its a good idea.
You've3 managed to diss women, older women, the military and cat lovers all in one fell swoop. So we have sexism, ageism, generalization, shall I go on or shall we just call it ignorance to be kind?
or this accusation:
She needs to stop doingt he Republicans dirty work... Do not do the Rethugs job for them Hillary.
I will preface my remarks by saying I an not defending Hillary Clinton I am just bringing in a bit of recent history.
You do know that the neo-cons have been running the narrative on Hillary Clinton for over 10 years don't you? You understand that all the hateful demonization that you read on Progressive blog comments were first raised and propagated by the far right evangelicals and the neo-cons, right? Do you understand the politics of the neo-cons, the history? PNAC? Where they "come from" meaning where/how "they" formed?
My understanding is that the core of this administration along with people like Kristol, Perle? Novak etc has been involved with all the Republican Presidency's since Nixon.
These people were intent on expanding Presidential powers and really, who knows what else. When Watergate started coming out and the administration was falling apart there was the committee or panel investigating to see if Impeachment was legal, were there grounds. There were a couple of young lawyers doing much of the research on this, looking for the citations that could be used etc. Not being a lawyer I really can't tell you in the appropriate jargon. One of those lawyers dug up the legal information that provided the OK to begin Impeachment proceedings which in turn forced Nixon's resignation. You can imagine what Cheney, Rumsfeld,Rove, (yes, that Rove) and the rest of that inner core and those that were next to them felt about that. The agenda of increasing Presidential power is now in the toilet, or at least on hold for awhile. Can't you just see Cheney's rage?
I pity the poor fool who crosses them, I really do. We know how they feel about being crossed and what they are capable of when someone thwarts them. Well, maybe we don't know, but we have an idea. Plame was outed and lost her career. Libby would take the hit and lose everything rather than cross them. No one at all will testify against them, Gonzales did their bidding, Seigelman (or is it seligman?) is in jail on most probably trumped up charges. I'm sure we don't know the half of it.
I sometimes wonder if the reason Impeachment is off the table and there is no real push to put it back on is less a matter of politics and re-election as it is about being scared witless at what might happen to them if they go after this crowd.
Anyway. These are not people you want to tangle with. So, back to this lawyer. This lawyer was a young woman, 26 years old named Hillary Rodham. YUP, one and the same.
It seems to me that from the moment the Clinton's hit Washington there was an organized effort to "get them" which was bizarre to me. I couldn't figure it out but every time you turned around there were accusations, investigations, lots of ugliness coming at them from all directions. Huge amounts of time and money spent and nothing could be used to take him down until he lied about his sex life and infidelity... how stupid is that given that he didn't even have to answer. So then what do we have? Impeachment proceedings. How symmetrical. Get to Hillary Rodham by destroying her husband which will marginalize her and effectively destroy her as well. Do you really think they wouldn't be capable of this?
When Hillary Clinton used the term "vast right wing conspiracy" she wasn't kidding, though she was laughed at, derided, insulted. But she was right. This isn't the only one of these groups. I would bet there are many, many... 10? 50? 100? more?
PNAC- the Project for the new American Century comes out of those core people in the Nixon administration. They have al signed it so you can go to the document which is on line... their "manifesto" and look to see who signed it and then look at their bio's on WIKI.
They are a scary group with a scary agenda. This Iraq war is just the tip of the iceberg. The idiot king who I would submit is their Manchurian candidate or sorts either wasn't malleable enough, or they just were insane enough to believe their own rhetoric on being greeted with flowers and candy.
These people are bloody and have no interest in Democracy. Their interest is in a world order with America at the top of the heap. Their interest is in corporate domination of all government. The so called spreading of democracy is no such thing. It is the spread of
consumerism, opening markets around the world, creating "needs" for the poor in undeveloped countries (underdeveloped they call it ). For the poor to buy the products they intend to sell them they need some more money... great, cheap labor to create the drugs of choice for greedy Americans: STUFF. Doesn't matter what it is as long as it is new stuff. Time to get rid of the Plazma TV's because LED's are coming. Time to create new looks and new colors in fashion, gotta move product. Well, they can get the labor, pay pennies, not have environmental standards or worker safety standards.
Unfortunately they are turning us into a lesser nation by doing so. The disparity between rich and poor gets greater and greater. But so what, those of us on the have not side are only existing for their well being. cogs.
Anyway, I don't know why I went into that. I sound like a conspiracy theorist. Where is my tinfoil hat?
My point is I may not like Hillary Clinton. I may disagree with her in many ways and disapprove of her tactics but calling her a neo-con tool or implying she is doing there work is a stretch... though maybe she has Stockholm Syndrome.
Personally I dislike her tactics but I understand them. I cannot imagine anyone going through the knocks and slams she has gone through and not only remain standing but working at what she believes in and standing up and defying the bastards by not lying down and dying.
I give her credit for that. I admire her for it. I think that steely defensiveness and attacks, while not justifiable are understandable given that she has had to do whatever was necessary to remain standing.
just my opinion.
I feel that if anyone is doing the "rethugs" work it is those that spread the neo-con hate Hillary agenda. I could be wrong but perhaps a kinder gentler approach creates a kinder gentler human being. Frankly I have never seen the kind of venom and attacks and distortions and analysis about everything said and done, and worn by this woman. It borders on irrational hysteria.
BTW, I have been around many campaigns, this one does not even come close to nasty yet. It has been pretty civil.
Now I am going to emaiil Hillary Clinton and suggest she lighten up in as polite and kind way as possible.
Call me a bleeding heart liberal but I just don't think Hatred, Sexism, ageism, and nasty cracks about the supporters of those opposing candidate have a place in a Progressive agenda. Hate and divisiveness are not Progressive values.
OMG, this is so long. Probably won't be published. Sorry moderator.
Going to try anyway.
Thursday’s contributions to the McAKAlist, in ‘high’ definition:
.
.
McKiss-Ass – there’s a drunk monkey in the White Housed with hickeys all over his butt.
McFoot-in-mouth – the longer he lasts, the harder it's gonna be for the press to clean up his sloppy toejobs.
McClapon/Clapoff – Cindybarbi’s activate/deactivate switch is handy around the house, but kinda disconcerting on the trail when the applause sign is flashing.
McRib – what to feed sycophantic reporters when yer on a limited budget.
Mcflip ‘n’ Mcflop –
...Johnny ‘n’Mitt,
......hittin’ the trail,
.........a-flippin and a-floppin
............and a changin’ their tales.
McBS - “My friends…I hope you enjoy your shit sandwiches” - Reporter, “this is my third one!”
McZzzzz – last in excitement, the polls, the alphabet – well everything, really. But he’ll be the first to go…soon…just follow the smoke, Johnny…
McBush-clone – vegetative propagation in all its inbredglory.
McYuk – the barfy kind, or the funny kind?
............................................Bofe.
McShame – being something without having any of it – it’s a nez(anti-zen) thing, practiced by backasswards lying egocentric narcissistic sociopaths the world over.
McKaineTheInsane,
....Endorsed by NoBrain.
........No matter how nutty,
..............AP’ll say they’re buddies.
Keep McPileing on C&L'ers! The current McList numbers 495 and the entire list and/or links will be posted on McDamnthisisgettingtobeareallllyfuckinglonglistalmostlikeafulltimejob and/or Open threads Sunday, and the previous day’s contributions the rest of the week, John permitting.
“Shorter lists are funnier” generally holds true, and very well may re the McList. C&L’ers are diverse and eclectic, and I’ve enjoyed many lols, LOLs, LOL!s and Ha ha’s here. I’m reluctant to exclude any McEntry, ’cause they’re all funny/pointed/cathartic to varying degrees, and the sheer length of the entire list has a humorous quality of its own.
We are also generating denigrating McMemes, some of which may be useful, in a memie sort of way. The thuglicontards are very aware of the usefulness of denigrating memes, and it won’t hurt to put out a few of our own.
That being said, a Top 11, Dirty Dozen, etc. are considerations, for those (myself included, usually) who like things condensed to essentials.
Will update at my convenience or tolerable inconvenience on pertinent threads.
8-D
I thought he'd already been through the Right wing Conspiracy-as a victim...
unsurebtwilling @ 91:
Projection. Nope, they don't see it. I used to stand with my jaw on the floor listening to the idiot king and his handlers talk about the "evil doers" and the "axis of evil" and the "terr-rists." It was so mind boggling that as he sopoke it was evident that he was talking about himself, the administration and what they were turning us into.
It still is mind boggling but somehow we become used to it, it isn't as shocking as it was the first 4 or 5 years. LOL.
Yeah, we all have a side of us that in unacknowledged and we project it out onto others. So it is pretty clear what that is in the idiot king and his trusty handlers. YIPES.
glad I don't have to work with that psyche.
SassySandy @ 25:
No, we just had to take NAFTA, welfare reform, no healthcare(which they were going to get and 8 years later. nothing) Then of course, we had Travelgate. Filegate, Monicagate, Jennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Whitewater, Fostergate, Ken Starr, Inpeachment, a Republican Congress, and some I am sure I have missed.
Bill in another time would be a Republican. NAFTA, 'Welfare reform' ie elimination. Terrible stuff from a supposed Democrat. So you are right there.
I am not a fan of Hillary as you may have noticed.
However, look at the 'gates' of Bill and then look at the 'gates' of Bush.
Take one Whitewater, a trumped up land deal investigated, re-investigated and then a special counselor and investigated again. No results, the McDougals indicted but nothing sticks to the Clintons.
Bush has Blackwater. A private mercenary army killing people at will.
How about Bush and torture. Or Bush and illegal electronic eavesdropping.
Bill was a vanilla republican, Bushco is off the map.
What is wrong with this picture.
frozen @ 69:
people working (at all levels) made this country great, the rich (robber barons by corp takeover) steal this money.
L.A. Confidential @ 67:
DId the preachers lie to the xtains! rapturing is going up or down hehehehe
frozen @ 84:
Might be a surprise to your average S&L gutting, stock ramping, swindling, lazy tached Repulsion but lefties generally work for a living and pay their taxes and try to be open honest decent people.
Of course this is lost on your average workshy R who likes to hitch free rides with corparate welfare, unfair trading rules and pallet loads of free money for the stealing.
unsurebtwilling @ 91:
You would think that the WOT was of such importance that they would send their own kids off to fight and die for the cause and pay extra taxes to pay for a proper conflict, but alas they are cowards and prefer to send other peoples kids off to die for their profits and inflated bank accounts.
I think its telling that they all wear those stupid flag pins (when on TV),
but never wear a badge or bumper sticker proclaiming "I pay extra taxes to support the WOT"
Bushco and the IRS back in 03 could have introduced voluntary addon taxes for keen Republican taxpayers eager to support the war, with big color coded badges to show their support. 5% 10% 20% all different colors, then they could have put their money where their mouth was.
It would have brought a tear to my eye to see all those badges proudly worn by patriotic Republican taxpayers... sniffle
Andy K @ 51:
I don't know, but it cant' be anything good...I don't like a presidential candidate meeting with such a secretive and rightwing group...it smells of conspiracy.
frozen @ 69:
Wow...this just speaks for itself dunnit?
The ignorance in this post is absolutely mind-boggling. Absolute brainwashed drivel.
I smell a rat from Bush and McCain from the White House, Does that mean another year 2000 election screw up? Never trust the Republians!
McCain is mad a lot of the time. It's 3am, and your children are asleep:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=OsivHvMJVrU
Bush has Blackwater. A private mercenary army killing people at will.
How about Bush and torture. Or Bush and illegal electronic eavesdropping.
I will share this news with members on ~~~~MeetWealthyBoomer.com~~~~ It is a very successful site for 30+ singles to meet love and romance. BTW, as a part-time model, I uploaded my best photos taken on beach with my lovely bikini. You may check them out first?
************************************
************************************
liberalNmoderation @ 106:
And furthermore...FUCK rich people!
Login or Register to post comments.