Palin volunteers to shoot bears on Wall Street from a helicopter.

All I can say is that if Bernie Sanders calls YOU a socialist, you know you're screwed.

dosido @ 2:

Palin volunteers to shoot bears on Wall Street from a helicopter.

Please aim at Kudlow.

"I'm votin' for McCain-Palin because she has a hot body and she shoots stuff." -- As heard from a staff member in Kudlow's TV studio

Kulow is just another hypocritical self-serving conservative elitist,

Kudlow - ugly voice, ugly hypocrite.

So wait let me get this right, the problem was created by too many people buying too much on credit and then not being able to pay the bill. So the solution is to make sure that people have more access to credit? That's like trying to put out a fire by throwing gas on it.

Wasn't Kudlow supposed to cut Sanders' mike or shout him down? That's standard American TV journalistic practice, I understand.

Oh, bernie, you illiterate ass, shut the fuck up.

You're giving socialism a bad name.

These fucks aren't advocating socialism. Socialism always aims for an egalitarian distribution of resources, wealth and responsibility.

This is sheer, pure Corporatism, whereby the state arm of the corporation preserves the 'bidness' arm with whatsoever resources it can appropriate from the commons.

If you' of all people, are gonna use the term, fucking use it fucking correctly, fuckwit...

More important is the question: Is Cindy McCain still a junkie?

kudlow sounds shrill.

It's good to see Bernie again. As a former Vermonter, and a former VT Congressional staffer, (not Bernies but we all three teams worked closely together), it's so cool to see a strong, opinionated, and intelligent man step up and challenge the rhetoric today.

If Kudlow believes the public will make money on this why don't all those rich investors invest into it?

woody, tokin librul @ 21:

Democratsrule @ 16:

Anyone who would listen to Kudlow and Cramer etc. is a nut! These idiots who pretend to be "experts" almost always get it wrong. They were saying like McStain and Bush up until a week ago that the economy is strong. They were encouraging people to keep investing while they knew it was going down the drain, these are wolves and they are scum!

Really, there's no exact or even remote animal analogy that describes or illuminates the behaviors of humans involved in 'money.' No other species will kill a member of its same species for no reason--which is what money is.

so leave the poor wolves alone. they've got enough problems with the CILF (Candidate I'd Like to Fuck)....

"Ripleeyyyyy!!!!"

After 9/11, Americans were told by the President that they had to sacrifice by spending our money.

As Bernie says, the middle and working classes have lost jobs and spending power since Bush got into office, however illegally. The greatest source of income became the equity in their homes or what they could get by buying a home and then taking equity loans as prices rose. Alan Greenspan said that this was what people should do. Home prices were going up so fast that it did become a "source of income" in hard times. This is why Bushies kept saying that everyone was doing so well. Southern republicans were buying those new boats and paying higher gas prices using this method as much as northern under- and unemployed.

Television ads for home loans became one of the larger types of ads seen.

These loans were profitable to the sellers of the mortgages (who "improved" the applications to get them approved), who, then, resold them throughout the world economy.

Everyone depended upon housing prices to go up and when they slowed, the market panicked.

Yet this is the same thing that Bush has done. Cut back on taxes and increased spending and corruption. Its called Tax and Borrow and this is the gift that this President wants to give to the next one.

woody, tokin librul @ 16:

Oh, bernie, you illiterate ass, shut the fuck up.

You're giving socialism a bad name.

These fucks aren't advocating socialism. Socialism always aims for an egalitarian distribution of resources, wealth and responsibility.

This is sheer, pure Corporatism, whereby the state arm of the corporation preserves the 'bidness' arm with whatsoever resources it can appropriate from the commons.

If you' of all people, are gonna use the term, fucking use it fucking correctly, fuckwit...

You know, Sanders is one of the few politicians who actually takes an interest in the workers in the field, people like you and me. Why the "fuck" are you going after him with such venom? And btw, the man is hardly illiterate.

Bonkers @ 30:

woody, tokin librul @ 16:

Oh, bernie, you illiterate ass, shut the fuck up.

You're giving socialism a bad name.

These fucks aren't advocating socialism. Socialism always aims for an egalitarian distribution of resources, wealth and responsibility.

This is sheer, pure Corporatism, whereby the state arm of the corporation preserves the 'bidness' arm with whatsoever resources it can appropriate from the commons.

If you' of all people, are gonna use the term, fucking use it fucking correctly, fuckwit...

You know, Sanders is one of the few politicians who actually takes an interest in the workers in the field, people like you and me. Why the "fuck" are you going after him with such venom? And btw, the man is hardly illiterate.

Because he's the only "socialist" in Congress.
And when he calls Kudlow and his ilk "socialists" too, he tarnishes his own 'luster' as well as that of anyone else who takes the principles of 'socialism' seriously, by putting himself--and the rest of us--in the same class as these predatory scum...it's both stupid and ignorant, and i do NOT know why anyone with a fucking brain would do it...

Its Class War. Since Mr. Kudlow thinks a Wall Street bailout is for Main St, I invite him to walk down my street...preferebly at night. He needs this sort of education.

woody, tokin librul @ 32:

Bonkers @ 30:

woody, tokin librul @ 16:

Oh, bernie, you illiterate ass, shut the fuck up.

You're giving socialism a bad name.

These fucks aren't advocating socialism. Socialism always aims for an egalitarian distribution of resources, wealth and responsibility.

This is sheer, pure Corporatism, whereby the state arm of the corporation preserves the 'bidness' arm with whatsoever resources it can appropriate from the commons.

If you' of all people, are gonna use the term, fucking use it fucking correctly, fuckwit...

You know, Sanders is one of the few politicians who actually takes an interest in the workers in the field, people like you and me. Why the "fuck" are you going after him with such venom? And btw, the man is hardly illiterate.

Because he's the only "socialist" in Congress.
And when he calls Kudlow and his ilk "socialists" too, he tarnishes his own 'luster' as well as that of anyone else who takes the principles of 'socialism' seriously, by putting himself--and the rest of us--in the same class as these predatory scum...it's both stupid and ignorant, and i do NOT know why anyone with a fucking brain would do it...

I think he was saying it for effect, both to get Ludlow's goat and to point out his (Ludlow's) hypocrisy, much like you called him an illiterate fuckwit. Come on, really; that's what you REALLY think of Sanders? All I am asking is that you imagine him standing in a room with you fighting your fight and you call him a fuckwit in the middle of a sentence, then imagine him raising an eyebrow at you, standing aside and saying, "Hokay. Insults, then! Have at it, kiddo."

The entire mortgage mess is a GET RICH, GET RICHER and GET FILTHY RICH SCHEME.

They knew what they were doing the entire time:

1 Deregulate Mortgage Lending
2 Increase demand for Mortgages. Offer easy credit with adjustable teaser rates to get people into houses they actually will not be able afford once the real rates kick in. Since there is no law you don't tell them that.
3 Increased demand for housing pushes up prices.
4 Repeat steps 2 and 3
5 Make a killing.
6 Bundle all those mortgages that are going to implode, give them a fancy name and SELL THEM!
7 Make another killing.

These people knew the SHIT WAS GOING TO HIT THE FAN.

This was a PONZI SCHEME.

They are greedy but they are not STUPID. Their BUDDY IN CHIEF, Dubya, is getting them the money back.

We are being FLEECED.

$700 Billion is $2,333 for every man woman and child in the country.

FLEECED!

Bernie Sanders has rightly taken it to the absolutely shameless, disgusting hypocrites of the corporate, profiteering, murderously imperial bunch in a measured way here. His use of "socialism" here is to highlight the quite valid argument regarding "corporate socialism," or, equivalently, "socializing losses and privatizing profits."

The gutter-dwelling free-market shills spout vacuous talking points that they receive routinely from the imperial propaganda machine (and this country has been enormously successful in driving home the propaganda- to quote the murderous imbecile in the WH). The entire right-wing, R-party enterprise is nothing more than a bunch of ignorant, self-obsessed, vicious, reckless empty-suits that are not even remotely aware of the garbage they talk and spew endlessly- only to be cheered on by clueless dittoheads ignorantly bent on self-destruction.

What the Congress in this country desperately needs is to send many more true "Independents" such as Bernie Sanders in order to build up a viable "third party" option that might just help curb the entrenched duopoly, and perhaps rein in, even eliminate, the mighty military industrial complex and its perpetual violence upon the world.

Those interested in challenging the duopoly would do well to strengthen the Senate campaign of Cindy Sheehan- whose victory would send a strong signal to the status-quo that fundamental changes are in order, and the imperial enterprise of greed and plunder must stop.

Alice, forget it...let it go.

It's quite clear what has to happen in this country. It's simply a matter of time.

Dishonest people like Kudlow are in large part responsible for what is wrong with this country.
*

Corporate Socialism:

From each to their party according to their need and to each according to their desire and loyalty to the powerful.

Bonkers @ 36:

woody, tokin librul @ 32:

Bonkers @ 30:

woody, tokin librul @ 16:

You know, Sanders is one of the few politicians who actually takes an interest in the workers in the field, people like you and me. Why the "fuck" are you going after him with such venom? And btw, the man is hardly illiterate.

Because he's the only "socialist" in Congress.
And when he calls Kudlow and his ilk "socialists" too, he tarnishes his own 'luster' as well as that of anyone else who takes the principles of 'socialism' seriously, by putting himself--and the rest of us--in the same class as these predatory scum...it's both stupid and ignorant, and i do NOT know why anyone with a fucking brain would do it...

I think he was saying it for effect, both to get Ludlow's goat and to point out his (Ludlow's) hypocrisy, much like you called him an illiterate fuckwit. Come on, really; that's what you REALLY think of Sanders? All I am asking is that you imagine him standing in a room with you fighting your fight and you call him a fuckwit in the middle of a sentence, then imagine him raising an eyebrow at you, standing aside and saying, "Hokay. Insults, then! Have at it, kiddo."

See me at 31.

Bernie Sanders is a fine fellow, despite being a politician. That very fact gives me hope for politicians in general.

Politicians need to know how to stand in and give and take with the worst that humanity has to offer.

Right here he is doing it.

So now WE ARE ALL SOCIALISTS.

Some Socialists want to have Universal Education and Universal Health Care. To help our most vulnerable citizens.

Some Socialists want to give away $700 Billion to Rich Wall Street Bankers.

NOW, since we are, it appears, all going to be SOCIALISTS, we only need to know which sort we are.

That is where Bernie Sanders is coming from here, I suspect.

Paul C @ 45:

Corporate Socialism:

From each to their party according to their need and to each according to their desire and loyalty to the powerful.

Heh, corporate socialism has another name: Fascism.

Liberal AND Proud @ 41:

Alice, forget it...let it go.

It's quite clear what has to happen in this country. It's simply a matter of time.

A matter of time until what?

BaScOmBe hearts Rachel Maddow hates MSM @ 29:

I heart Bernie Sanders.

Bernie kicks ass and takes names. Kudlow is a buffoon. I love when Allard says that it's not class warfare. More like class welfare.

Sorry...ALICE...not Alex

i dont get the "bailout Wall St" meme... its like no one on main st. has any retirement, savings, business to do...

Universal Healthcare Bad.........Wall Street Bailout Good.

That translates to "Fuck the people"

Why use the peoples money to help the people when we can just steal it!!

Joe & Jane sixpack have had it hammered into their tiny brains that "socialism" is BAD. It's BAD because it's fair, and the corporate fatcats don't LIKE it. So, rather than brush up what it means, they just parrot that they don't want socialism, when in fact they NEED it.

I wish Sanders was one of MY Senators.

And I'll send May Day cards to Comrade Kudlow next year.

See Ralph Nader here speak on the bailout.

The Democrats are talking a good talk on some of the points, but not all. As we have seen in the past, they can talk a good talk and then completely cave to the Swindler in Chief.

Let Nader Debate.

For that matter, let Barr and McKinney debate. I want to hear all of them.

My email to Kudlow after he blames the Democrats for the meltdown:
Mr. Kudlow,

It has come to my attention that you are blaming the Liberal Congress for the sub prime meltdown and investment institution bailout. You are supposed to be an intelligent person but your logic makes no sense. Either you are not as intelligent as you claim or you are a liar. There is no doubt that the financial meltdown was started by the conservative Congress. In 1999 Phil Gramm introduced the banking deregulation bill known as the “Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act” and it was voted on and passed with a Republican majority. The Republican sponsored bill is at the root of the sub prime meltdown as you well know. The sub prime meltdown is at the root of the investment bank meltdown as you know. Why would blame Liberals for this mess when it is quite obviously a Republican induced nightmare.

Everybody knows it was the Bush administration and a Republican Congress who looked the other way throughout 2001-2006 while investment banks (run by Republicans), commercial banks (run by Republicans) and loan brokers (run by Republicans) who PUSHED these loans on unsophisticated borrowers. I have no idea how much television you watch or radio you listen to but during that time there were (and still are) ad after ad telling home owners (people who already owned their homes and many who had owned them for many years) to borrow against those homes and use the money to have fun. These were/are home that people should be relying on for security during their retirement. These brokers and banks did everything they could to make unsuspecting home owners leverage their homes against their best interests. These were not Liberals with guilty consciences. These loans were PUSHED onto unsophisticated borrows by greedy Republicans.

When you try to blame liberals for this nightmare you lose any credibility you may have had. Furthermore, you always promote the “Free Market System” but you are the first to applaud the government socialized bailout for the Republican run investment banks. Again you lose any credibility you may have had. In the end you have become a joke to the people you call your audience. I know bankers and stock brokers and investment advisors (I work in the industry) who have CNBC on a television all day long and after the Market has closed and just about the time they are getting ready to call it a day and head home or to the bar your show comes on and they tell me they have a good laugh and watch for a few minutes. In the past, people in finance thought your knew what you were talking about but over the past nine months or a year you have turned into a clown who has no credibility. These people are not idiots. These people are very smart and understand the world of finance. Their lives are the world of high finance. They know what they are talking about.

I suggest you revisit your stance on this issue to try to regain any confidence you may have had with these type of investment professionals and come clean with who is really responsible for this financial disaster, the likes of which we have not seen since you were a financial advisor to President Reagan or the Wall Street meltdown of 1929. At this point you have no credibility.

Sincerely,

Captain Kangaroo

I love it!

The conservative bullshit train has come full circle. They are exactly what they always railed against. Thow did protest too much. Say it louder Bernie!

Bernie Sanders is awesome because he's a real socialist. We definitely need more people like him in the Senate... and the House... and the White House...

Notice he said, "Every 25 years or so..." So when we pay off the debts of this bailout in 20 years, they're going to need another one.

Anonymous @ 74:

Notice he said, "Every 25 years or so..." So when we pay off the debts of this bailout in 20 years, they're going to need another one.

Yeah, basically he's saying that "free market" capitalism works... except when it doesn't... which is every 20 years or so coinciding with repukelican rule... which needs a bailout... which isn't socialism... or class warfare... Anybody else have a headache?

dosido @ 2:

Palin volunteers to shoot bears on Wall Street from a helicopter.

LOL!!!

Someday I'd love to have brunch with Bernie (and not just every Friday morning on the Thom Hartmann radio show). Go Senator Sanders!

Kudlow, formerly conservative, now for socialism for his wall street friends.

Thanks, Karen@49, for the clarification re. Cindy Sheehan's run for Pelosi's House seat.

As a friend recently pointed out (quite correctly, in my judgment)- the long-standing and overwhelmingly futile efforts of virtually all 3rd party candidates for President (Ralph Nader being the best example) is in effect a meaningless exercise. The outrageous electoral farces of 2000/2004, despite Nader's candidacy, have only sustained, if not worsened the duopoly's iron-fisted control over the political system. To the extent that today, candidates outside the duopoly (and even the fringe candidates within the duopoly- such as Kucinich, Gravel or Paul) are systematically marginalized, including corporate manhandling in the polls, in organized exclusion from debates, in fudging debate results whenever (as has happened often) post-debate polls have overwhelmingly favored the "fringe" candidate- and on and on.

In the face of this continuing farce, which is really a slap in the face of democracy and free speech- the friend suggests that extra-duopoly forces may (or should) instead unite behind realistically winnable campaigns (and not simply waste resources on futile presidential runs). Thus, putting unified resources behind Cindy Sheehan, and other Congressional (or Senatorial) candidates, especially when Sheehan, in San Francisco, a high-profile liberal city, has a fighting chance of pulling off a win against Pelosi (given the latter's absolutely scandalous performance)- makes perfect sense.

If dedicated Independents or 3rd party representatives (such as Sheehan, and other antiwar, pro-peace, pro-labor, pro-minorities, pro-human rights campaigners)can be sent to Congress in larger numbers- it will begin (one hopes) a snowballing process, having shown that the duopoly can be broken.

Until something that at least puts a dent in the corrupt duopoly enterprise is carried out (by ingenious stealth- as in uniting forces in winnable strategies)- the idea of getting "electoral reform" is simply wishful thinking.

woody, tokin librul @ 73:

Karen @ 45:

Bonkers @ 36:

woody, tokin librul @ 32:

I think he was saying it for effect, both to get Ludlow's goat and to point out his (Ludlow's) hypocrisy, much like you called him an illiterate fuckwit. Come on, really; that's what you REALLY think of Sanders? All I am asking is that you imagine him standing in a room with you fighting your fight and you call him a fuckwit in the middle of a sentence, then imagine him raising an eyebrow at you, standing aside and saying, "Hokay. Insults, then! Have at it, kiddo."

Come on, woody, Sanders' whole point was that all of a sudden, when Wall Street causes a crisis and gets in trouble, Libertarians like Kudlow cry out for a handout. You know, "every 20 or 30 or 50 years or so," the government has to step in like a Socialist government would in general. The whole point was that Kudlow was NOT a Socialist, but a hypocrite.

As Jon Stewart put it -- free market very good at causing problems, not so much at solving them.

To call 'begging for a hand-out" socialism betrays the very essence of what beliefs he professes to hold about equity.

Cannot you folks see this?

Calling Kudlow a 'socilaist' just gives all the more ammunition to the myrid, uncountable knuckledraggers who ALWAYS throw "socialism' in to muddy the water and condemn any proposals that smack of equity, fairness and the rest.

Soicialism is NOT about "free hand-outs." That's the Rightard/Flying Monkey/Fuckwit construction. Sanders knows that, and that [pisse me the fuck off. I don't care what a "good guy" hje is, he's just proven to me he's got no more intellectual integrity than George Bush...

Okay, so you believe Socialism is a good thing, and to apply the term to this bailout even in an ironic sense denigrates the concept so much that it brings Bernie Sanders down to George Bush's level of intellectual integrity. I'm afraid you have reached terminal silliness.

Kudlow and his ilk rail against any government intervention that would help people because doing so is what a Socialist government would do. It's always bad, according to them, even in times of crisis, such as the crisis we are experiencing with health care. They always claim that having the government intervene in the market leads to outright Socialism, will always make things worse, and must be avoided at all costs.

Always, that is, except for now. Of course, Kudlow isn't a Socialist. Of course what the government is doing is not Socialist. That's the point. It only resembles Socialist action in that the government will intervene in a market -- the very thing Kudlow decries as Socialist.

Calling him a Socialist is an ironic way of calling him a hypocrite. (It also, by the way, twists the knife a bit when he hears it.)

It's okay, though, there's treatment for irony deficiency.

Karen @ 50:

Paul C @ 45:

Corporate Socialism:

From each to their party according to their need and to each according to their desire and loyalty to the powerful.

Heh, corporate socialism has another name: Fascism.

I think in this instance a more accurate description of Kudlow's stance would be "State Capitalist".
Sanders (I believe)wasn't seriously calling Kudlow a Socialist,rather,he was "taking the piss" out of him.

I wish Bernie Sanders was the Senator of my state.

Conservatism is just a cover for the wealthy to stay wealthy. Conservatism uses fear and hatred to make sure greedy and plundering policies of a chosen few remain legal.

What the hell is wrong with this country that we only have one Bernie Sanders in the Halls Of Power?
Could we shoot for at least 5?
Are the people of Vermont that much smarter than the rest of us?

Well, watched this vid... Never have watched Kudlows show... Now I know why you are so fond of him John A. That whole back and forth, what. a. crock.!
So, it turns out Kudlow is OK with a little government intervention every 20 or 30 or 50 years.... To intervene with the taxpayer dollar apparently when the house of cards which oddly enough takes the free marketeer types about 20 to 30 to 50 years to get set up and running syphoning off wealth before it begins to fall apart...

At that point he's OK with tax payers picking up the pieces... So they can start the whole financial masquarade all over again. Ain't that convenient for the wealthy and their carnival barking mouthpieces ... One guy with a gun robbing a bank... Man, anyone can understand the mechanics of that. But some nebulous group looking to swindle the whole nation or world?? That's hard for many people to wrap their minds around unless it's presented as fiction or a 007 Bond or maybe a B. Willis movie.... People just ussually don't seem to be able to grasp a crime of that magnitude. They think anyone who speaks of that kind of scheme as a bit off, loony even, tinfoil hatters etc....

So this kind of shit worked in the 19th century which was the first and second time business managed to get congress to tilt the playing field via among other things, that whole business as a person crap in the 1870s.. There was also the financial shennanigans of the 1820's and 30's under Andrew Jackson as well, but what occurred in the 1870's and 80's in congress precipitated the 1907 financial storm. And the whole merry go round worked again post WWI and thru the 20's when again, business was given free reign, which set up the crash of 29... And it all worked in large part because people we're successfully kept in the dark about the sordid details... But now? We got us a little thing called the internet and it so far don't matter how much media consolidation occurs with ownership by the same crooks causing this.... The truth is getting out there and people are realizing we're getting played and have been getting played for over a hundred years at least...

I ain't the only seeing this, I ain't the only person sick of this shit.... And I ain't the only one saying NO! Enough is enough, no more blank checks written against my labors using my dime!! And just as an aside, if Kudlow was old enough to know Alexander Hamilton?? Then maybe he's a little too long in the tooth to even be offering advice on anything, save maybe metamucil dosages.... But then on the other hand... there's McCain???? Ehh, Kudlow may be a supply sider cheerleading moron, but I guess McCain has made it OK to be old and out of touch with reality... And STILL run for president...... So I guess ol Larry Kudrow is going to stay on the tube giving bullshit advice based on a failed ideology of greed. I don't think I'll be tuning in....JD

Neo @87,

Twisting words indeed! There isn't a conservatard pundit who doesn't deserve an honorary PhD in techno-global-bullshit!

When anything for the people pops up, don't you know hard working people have too much pride to ask for handouts? Deadbeat implied.

But when it comes to millionaire handouts - suddenly its "liquidity enhancement, or capitol diversification" or some other Orwellean bullshit term they invented to make stealing sound very sophisticated and proper.

I hope all these sick bastards not only rot in hell, but that they "take it with them," only to find out hell is some sort of opposite universe where the poor have it made, and fuck over the rich everyday.

this is a great example of how the Republicans love their double standards, to a mother who is trying to raise her kids and hold a job or two it's "No Help For You!" but when it's greedy white bankers who go bust due to their shitty deals then it's "We need to bail out these guys for the good of the nation"

Oh how I hate Republicans, they greatest enemy America has ever known. Al Queda could never have hoped to bring the destruction the Republicans have created. But don't worry because it's all Obama's fault, somehow.

I think if you started throwing people in jail for robber baron actions, the market would magically correct itself. IMO

The rich have always had the idea that they are earning their money, when in actuallity other people earn money for them.

If you are earning more yearly than a brain surgeon, you are not earning that money. You are being given a blessed bonus.

Kudos to Bernie!!
I love how Kudlow argues that he's only for corporate socialism "every twenty or thirty years" - which always seems to be just about the amount of time needed for each wave of the deregulation manias he and his robber baron ilk promote to bring about an economic meltdown.

Karen@89:

Your views about the American electoral farce are perceptive, and quite realistically, lead to pessimism regarding a truly hopeless situation. I agree that the 2-party charade, controlled with criminal efficiency by armaments and energy peddlers, the propaganda ministry (a la Fox News, the American Enterprise Institute, and the like) and by political lobbies driven by racism and xenophobic hatred- is deeply entrenched, and the power wielded by the Washington insiders and their lobby-patrons is such that an outsider cannot penetrate the corrupt, impenetrable barrier.

Yet, I am not entirely convinced that electoral reform is even remotely possible in this environment. The role of journalism in this country is a tragic joke (a flesh trade, essentially). The unholy entente between rabid Zionists, lunatic Christian right-wingers, and corrupt-to-the-core Wall Street CEOs and their immoral cohorts: these alliances have thoroughly damaged this country (and I am only referring to the most recent version of this runaway crime-spree: the Reagan and post-Reagan imperialism of the Anglo-American killing machine).

Some talk about the American people being either too comfortable, too supine, or perhaps irredeemably brainwashed to bring about any revolutionary change. In such cases, the use of stealth and craftiness may be a possible tool to effect change when and where least expected. It has happened elsewhere in the world.

All that coke Kudlow snorted in the 90's turned his brain into mush. Keep drinking the kool-aid larry! what an arrogant SOB!!!!