Colbert uncovers an Alpha Dog counting gonad wrinkles in Montana
By David Neiwert Tuesday May 12, 2009 3:30pm
Stephen Colbert had a little fun with this story last night:
A Belgrade couple decided they couldn't afford the lost income if the husband reported for jury duty, so they cooked up an expletive-filled affidavit telling the court in no uncertain terms that the husband didn't want to serve.
That was back in January.
Now, the vulgarity-laced affidavit has turned up on the Internet on a Web site called The Smoking Gun, owned by the cable and satellite network Court TV.
“Apparently you morons didn't understand me the first time. I CANNOT take time off from work. I'm not putting my family's well-being at stake to participate in this crap,” begins the notarized affidavit submitted to the Gallatin County District Court last January by Erik A. Slye.
Slye goes on to say that he doesn't believe in America's “justice” system (the quotation marks are his) and that jury duty is “a complete waste of time.”
Most of Slye's other comments use language not suitable to be quoted here.
Slye was traveling on business Friday and couldn't be reached for comment; but his wife, Jennifer, told the Associated Press that she - not her husband - actually wrote the affidavit.
“I wrote it and he sent it in. We figured it was either crazy enough to work or he was going to end up in jail,” Jennifer Slye said in a telephone interview. “I guess it could have been said a little nicer, but it wouldn't have had the same impact.”
... When Erik got the summons for jury duty, he asked to be excused on the basis of lost income, but got a second notice a month later.
“We had to up the ante,” Jennifer said. “Some people think we're like militia people or something ... but I just said, ‘We can't afford it. That didn't work. Maybe this will.' ”
Erik Slye did end up being excused from jury duty in that instance and has since been twice more excused - once because he again pleaded financial hardship and the second time because the trip he was taking Friday clashed with the court schedule.
District Judge John Brown, in whose Bozeman court Erik Slye was summoned to serve, said Friday that a foul-mouthed affidavit is not a good model to follow to avoid jury duty.
Brown said he summoned Erik Slye into court two weeks ago to discuss the affidavit.
“We understand that it's a hardship for people to come down here and serve, but everybody, all citizens, have a legal obligation,” the judge told Slye, according to a transcript provided by the court.
“Maybe you'll be excused, but the point is that you should ask like an adult and not like you're 13 years old,” the judge told Slye.
At Judge Brown's direction, Slye apologized to several clerks who were in the courtroom at the time.
Still, as Colbert points out, he did get out of jury duty nonetheless.
I noticed that the wife who wrote the letter seemed confused by people's impressions they were involved in the militias. Maybe that's because Montanans have for some years now been reading screeds from the Montana Freemen that weren't appreciably different from hers. Particularly the line about not believing in "your 'Justice' system.'
My Montana-native wife was hoping that Conrad Burns' defeat would finally mean an end to national embarrassments for her home state. Alas, no such luck.








Login or Register to post comments.
As Colbert points out this genius ultimately was granted his request of no jury duty. The judge should have made an example of him. People should not be allowed to openly mock the court system of this country when they are called to complete their civic duty.
Also, I just read and posted on how the Shuttle Atlantis has been damaged:
http://yellingatthemoon.com/2009/05/12/shuttl...
I think the shuttle is trying to get out of bringing the astronauts back home.
"People should not be allowed to openly mock the court system of this country when they are called to complete their civic duty. "
I disagree.
I can't seem to get any of the videos to work
Me too.
All of the videos at C&L seem to be affected, not just this thread.
Looks like it would be funny!
[Sorry, but we had a server crash. Everything had to be moved to the backup server. Should be working now, thanks to our hard working tech guy, JK! Thanks for your patience. Site Monitor]
Hey, it's not hard to avoid getting selected for jury duty, just act like you have half a brain when the attorneys question you. I guarantee you won't be selected. Bot defense and prosecution look for the lowest common denominators that will be easily swayed by emotional appeals. It's worked for me.
♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫♪♫
“We figured it was either crazy enough to work or he was going to end up in jail,” Jennifer Slye said.
So instead of serving his jury duty, at probably $50/day, he was willing to go to jail for 30 days at $0/day?? I suppose this makes sense in bizarro world.
...his wife wrote the letter. Most likely she was the one worried about "loss of income" while Mr. Slye would've enjoyed a few days off, at $50 per.
Colbert makes the outrageous ill-mannered idiots look so ridiculous. Colbert is laugh out loud funny.
In the 15 or so years I worked at companies who paid your full wage through jury duty, I NEVER got called. Not even to come in or fill out a questionnaire, much less counting me out because of my answers on the questionnaire. That's why I never feel sorry for California if they ever bitch about a lack of jurors. Maybe it is because I live in Sacramento County, where there are tons of State workers, who are paid their entire wage to serve. When I lived in Los Angeles, I got called, even though I only lived there 3 years.
I'm disappointed in Colbert. I thought that was mean-spirited and not in the least bit funny.
As a fifth generation Montanan, I think I can explain...
Those of us in this state who are well balanced, educated, productive members of society love when these stories come out, because if enough of them keep emerging, perhaps wealthy out-of-staters will stop buying up all the best land and building obscenely expensive mansions here. We don't know how else to fight the never-ending flood of these strange people, so we just encourage this sort of lunacy. Seeing the news when one of these stories comes out is only slightly less funny than watching a Californian ruining his/her Mercedes Benz on a rocky, narrow mountain road.
If you watch the blow-up of the letter's text, it definitely looks like "our" justice system not "your" system.
I have to agree with Snowball. Lawyers on both sides don't want jurors who know anything about the law. They usually want jurors who don't know anything about anything. Try to appear educated and interested. You'll be home by lunchtime.
Colbert is not funny... or interesting.
In a nation the has "equal justice under law" as one of it's ideals, why should anyone by made an "example"?
Especially since making example of someone does nothing to stop crime or noncompliance.
Login or Register to post comments.