Michael Reagan: Leading the Right into permanent irrelevance
Democrats are going to need to recognize that there are real limits to the current urgings of "bipartisanship." Because the fanatical right has no intention of dealing with Obama in good faith.
Exhibit A: Michael Reagan:
EXPOSE LIBERAL CORRUPTION -- With the Democrats back in power in both Congress and the White House, you KNOW that they'll be falling right back into their habits of taking lobbyists' money under the table, trading votes for campaign contributions, spying on and sabotaging Republican legislative plans, covering up their leaders' sexual "flings," and spending taxpayer money on personal expenses like never before. But this time, YOU AND I will be there every step of the way, making sure that no stone is left unturned, every dark corner is filled with light, and every illegal act is paid for with censure, impeachment, recalls, investigations, and jail time for every criminal we expose in Washington, D.C.
Reagan is basically giving the playbook for the conservative movement, which is to kick up dust, accuse everyone associated with Obama of sexual misconduct, personal corruption, pay-to-play politics, and lobbyist ties, and then call for impeachments and investigations. And this isn't some loon. Reagan's not only the (adopted) son of a former President, he's a conservative pundit with, well probably not a million listeners but a good number. And he's a well-received citizen of the DC establishment, taking the blame the media narrative to an remarkably audacious level. Though he's called CNN the Terrorist News Network, Reagan appeared on Larry King as recently as October to appear opposite Robert Kennedy Jr, and he has refused to appear on MSNBC because he claims he receives death threats, or so he said at an exclusive party for television industry executives at the Beverly Hills Hotel.
He's also the guy who went on the air a few months ago and said this:
There is a group that's sending letters to our troops in Iraq ... claiming 9/11 was an inside job -- oh, yeah, yeah -- and that they should rethink why they're fighting. Who -- we ought to -- excuse me, folks, I'm going to say this: We ought to find the people who are doing this, take them out and shoot them.
Really. Just find the people who are sending those letters to our troops to demoralize our troops and do what they are doing, you take them out, they are traitors to our country, and shoot them. You have a problem with that, deal with it. But anyone who would do that doesn't deserve to live. You shoot them. You call them traitors -- that's what they are -- and you shoot them dead. I'll pay for the bullet.
It will be instructive indeed to observe who goes marching off with Reagan on his quest for ignominous irrelevance.
Who's he supposed to be
Dickless Tracy?
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
Cluless dick.
Reagan is a disgrace to the name. He is another repug terrorist just like Limbaugh. We know Reagan is adopted and wonder what "bad seed" he came from. Is his opinion shared with the repug party? or is this just his warped mind working?
is there some kind of 'grace' associated with reagan? because i always thought he was a fuckhead.
I'll bet all those laid-off steelworkers of 20 years ago wish Ronald Reagan was doing for steel what Obama is proposing for the auto industry. Instead, Reagan did NOTHING as foreign imports streamed into the US with cheap prices, leading manufacturers to lay off tens of thousands of people. Then he sneaked out of a Pittsburgh speech because there were demonstrators outside, instead of being a man and discussing the issue with them. RR also killed the air traffic controllers union at the time, too. Now his son is proposing violence toward people who do not agree with him? If so, he could be arrested and charged with terroristic threats if he's not careful. At least Ron Jr. has the common sense his older brother doesn't have.
He writes a nice imflammatory line of invective, and likes to accuse "liberals" of treason apparently- but when I went to the linked site, reaganaction.com to respond and point out that the real traitors to this country are Bush, Cheney and anyone who's supported their anti-Constitutional agenda, to my surprise there are ZERO links to email anyone, but a whole bunch of links to www.secure.conservativedonations.com.
So he's interested in money apparently, but opinions other than his own, not so much...
I've watched the situation since 1970 or so and have realized that Democratic corruption is routinely reported by mainstream media (with the exception of Al Gore) but GOP corruption was aired only during the Watergate years. I, and most other taxpayers, would appreciate knowing about all crooks in office, not just the ones who didn't kiss media hiney. We were spoonfed Edwards as a man on the ethical high road while he backstabbed his dying wife and paid his 'ho more per week than many of his North Carolina voters earned in a year. The Bush family escapades in the Savings and Loans and in the bin Laden family were given back-page treatment so they could take over governments and load bureaucracies in not one, but three or more states.
Let Reagan have his way, and get some good guys and gals like John Amato into the mainstream broadcast media so we can out the GOP thieves. It's proven that scandal sells, so if reporters aren't doing their jobs, "gotcha" some of them as well.
nickname for his lumpy little stepson was "schmuck". Paging Dr. Freud...
adopted son.
What's with the "(adopted) son" bullshit? Michael Reagan is Ronald Reagan's son, not a parenthetical, sort-of, not-really, son. Just his son. Unless you are interested in his genetic makeup, the fact of his adoption ought to be irrelevant, don't you think?
Apparantly when little Ron Reagan Jr didn't torture animals and beat up smaller kids, the Reagan family went out and found a crazy child living in a junkyard that they could be proud of.
He was born in California to Irene Flaugher, a single woman from Kentucky[1] who became pregnant through an affair with an army corporal named John Bourgholtzer (died 1993), and was adopted by Ronald Reagan and Jane Wyman shortly after his birth.
(n/t)
This has enough information to understand there is plenty of potential for some real issues.
I forgot all about this adopted child from his marriage to Jane Wyman. When I was very little, I remember being drawn to her lovely smile in old movies I'd watch with my mother.
Ronald Raygun probably dropped him after the divorce, and thus, the bullying, abusive, anger issues.
OH, and Raygun was a puppet, no statesman, a B-actor, and senile the last term. I can't think of one thing positive he was directly responsible for during his tenure.
Yuppies and ketchup as a vegetable in the school lunch programs do NOT count.
You mean he DIDN'T singlehandedly bring down the Soviet Union, tear down the Berlin Wall and bring and end to the 50 year cold war?
I'm shocked!
There's certainly nothing wrong with adoption. On the contrary, it's an admirable thing. But there is a theory that Michael Reagan, already insecure because of possible abandonment issues after his father married Nancy, is fixated on his adopted status and that perhaps his extreme right-wing rhetoric is just a cry for Daddy's love and attention.
Ron Jr. and Patty are Democrats. Maureen was a Republican, but certainly not a wack-job like poor Mike.
To put pop-psychology aside, it could just be a matter of simple genetics: Mike doesn't seem to be all that bright. He might well be a psychologically well person who just happened to have fallen out of The Stupid Tree and hit his head on every one of the branches on the way down.
Like Manson was adopted?
Or Ted Bundy was adopted?
Who sires these monsters?
Close, but no banana. FWIW, Ted Bundy wasn't adopted but was born to his single mother and raised with her, being told his grandmother was his mother and his biological mother was his sister.
.
Well, he does give props to Republicans for their ability to really press for accountability for poor behavior and decisions made, no?
The Democrats could learn...
.
Starve the WAR Beast...
... Save the World.
A few days ago, back when everyone was positively giddy about having won one (and not for The Gipper), I cautioned that the long knives were already being sharpened by the right-wingers. This Jon Kyl supreme court bullshit is but one example (of many) to substantiate my assertion. To the extent the progressives get cocky, comfortable or complacent, they will get mowed down.
Again, these fuckers are not going away and will stop at nothing to reacquire their power base. Accordingly, they must be called out harshly at every turn - daily, hourly, whatever it takes. They cannot be permitted to get a toe hold, not after this much progress has been made. The more high-profile the ridicule and discrediting, the more effective. Do not let up. Ever.
"...their habits of taking lobbyists' money under the table, trading votes for campaign contributions, spying on and sabotaging Republican legislative plans, covering up their leaders' sexual "flings," and spending taxpayer money on personal expenses like never before."
Projection, on an epic scale. I could post multiple stories of Republicans being caught in each of the items he listed just over the last two years.
he was somewhere else during the 109th congress.
My sister could easily take that pistol from you and whip your weak ass with it.
Is this post actually inviting commentary on 9/11 conspiracy? On C&L?!? Isn't that just waving a red cape in front of the sitemonitors?
:)
Corruption favors the wealthy.
So does that mean Mark Foley, Larry Craig, and Ted Stevens are all really just democrats in disguise according to this mensa candidate? He makes my head hurt.
I'm sitting on my pain.
The outcome of the most recent election tells me that the public is sick and tired of this sort of bullshit. As long as people are getting broker every day and losing their homes, no one with any sense will pay attention to any of this. Let them have all the pissing matches they want because the only result of a pissing match is that everyone gets soaked in urine.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
Since it's suddenly time to break out the law books and the handcuffs for every parking ticket shall we also be pulling out the 5000 boxes of evidence on the last 8 years of reslug criminal rule?
I'm sure there are a lot of people ready, willing and able to start those prosecutions right away.
I said almost the same thing last night.
Let's start with the republicans that we already know have broken laws and prosecute them to set an example for the democrats that try commiting crimes or have an affair. That will teach them democrats a lesson.
I'm glad to hear Republicans will not let the Democrats do what they did for 8 years. Yes it's good to hear Republicans will not let the Obama Administation steal taxpayers money and put us in a recession, or have thousands of soldiers killed based on lies and greed for foreign oil and of course make sure Obama doesn't have innocent Foreign people kidnapped, tortured, raped and murdered while keeping everyone in jail without charges. No more 109th Congress to rubber stamp the Presidents checks without one question being asked. I'm glad the Republican Party will now watch out for Americans while Obama/Biden are in charge.
Reagan/Palin in 2012
Sarah will never accept second place again.
[Deleted. Over the top and a little bit on the sexist side. Please don't alienate at least half of our readers. Thank you. Site Monitor]
... would be being stuck inside the Winchester Mystery House.
"Which door?!?!? Which door?!?!?! God, tell me which door!?!?!?!"
Didn't John McCain play that out on stage at least twice?
... poses for a 'tough cop' photo like Reagan does there should not be trusted to have good sense on any issue.
Gun safety is not a joke. I don't care if it's not loaded, you're setting an example, dumbass.
I had a friend killed by an unloaded pistol.
I get uncomfortable when someone points a squirtgun at me. Every gun should be treated as loaded and deadly. Sorry to hear about that tragedy.
I believe that people like this punk Reagan underestimate how many Americans really want Obama to succeed. Their open hostility towards the democratically elected leader will be seen as "unpatriotic"(remember aiding and abetting the enemy?) while Obama tries to clean up the many catastropic messes they left him.
I'm having a garage sale to pay for bullets to send to these right wing nuts with the hope that they will use them on themselves.
And, Reagan, I already have the money for yours.
Any man who poses with a gun in order to look tuff probably has a rudimentary penis at best. He's a fine-feathered wing-nut. Someone please take that gun away from him!
May I adopt that term for use?
I'm sure you're right. It's been my experience, that the
loud-mouthed blustery types are seriously lacking in the
unit length/strength department.
He really looks and talks like a pussy doesn't he?
I'd like to see him on a tour of duty in Iraq, as if he's man
enough to go.
BassBanger and Boocilla have done their research on the subject, and I can corroborate their conclusions.
Incitement to commit murder is a crime! The first time one of his ignorant red necks admits to being inspired by this nut he needs to be arrested and prosecuted to make a clear example of what is not to be tolerated in a modern civil society.
Perhaps we can destroy this mad dog for being rabid? He certainly appears to be a public threat!
I believe that people like this punk Reagan underestimate how many Americans really want Obama to succeed.
i'm equally afraid that folks on the left do NOT realize just how much the Right--the CorpoRats, the paymasters, the board-rooms--wants the people who want Obama to "succeed" (pretty much whatever that means) to be disappointed. Or the resources they are prepared to pour into the enterprise. Or the depths of their hatred for the 'liberal' aspirations of the "people." Or what exactly they're prepared to do to thwart it...
Just remember: JFK was NEVER really a treat to the powers-that-be, but people thought he could be, and that's could NEVER be tolerated...
The only reason anyone pays attention to this nitwit is because he sounds so radical. If he weren't spewing bs, no one would even remember him. Kinda like Rush and all the other bs artist.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
... no one would bve hearing his radical talk, except for a bunch of teenaged skinheads throwing heil-hitlers at him
I bet this asshole never said a word about the lobbiest paying into the Repugs...I'm sure he never said a word about the criminal detention of people who have never been charged with any crime, but that didn't stop us from torturing them...Never said a word about the most secretive administration since Nixon, pulling all kinds of fucked up back room deals.
No, he couldn't call out those crimes...because they are actual crimes...and the Republicans only deal in bullshit.
Michael Reagan is one of the many poster boys and girls for media reform. In the same way the right wing's books are propped up by think tanks, and large corporations by bulk buying and giving the books best seller status, the large corporations and media giants prop up right wing radio by not only saturating the market but restricting advertising dollars to match corporate agendas. The Education tool that TV and Radio should be is instead being used as corporation and right wing propaganda machines. We need to break up the media giants and pass laws that severely restrict the ownership of local TV and Radio stations to locally controlled and owned businesses.
I thought that picture had been lifted from some shitty cop drama. That's actually him posing?
What a penis head.
If the Republican party wishes to rebuild itself it will have to do away with the termites that feed off them - Reagan, Limbaugh, Coulter, and Fox. They can't win using courting the same old hate radio listeners.
...here are a few people he might want to pick up on the way:
1. Alberto Gonzales
2. Dick Cheney
3. Karl Rove
4. Rummy
5. George W. Bush
6. Just pick up the entire Bush Administration
7. Ted Stevens
8. Tom Delay
and the list goes on and on.
I remember when the Republicans trotted out this tripe about Clinton. The stakes at that time weren't really that high. We, as a nation, weren't in the peril that we are in today. If the Republican machine decided to impeach Obama for a sexual act or some other ridiculous excuse, like they did to Bill Clinton, they would be laughed out of town by the American people. The stakes are too high this time around to be dealing with these asinine shenanigans.
Joe the Plumber--another clog in that backed-up toilet.
(n/t)
The Education tool that TV and Radio should be is instead being used as corporation and right wing propaganda machines. We need to break up the media giants and pass laws that severely restrict the ownership of local TV and Radio stations to locally controlled and owned businesses.
But nobody posting here will live long enough to see it happen.
The corruption of the possibilities of mass media were assured 100 years ago, when the first 'propagandists' recognized how media could be manipulated to 'manufacture' the consent of the governed without the people actually assenting to anything except iimages...
I am so livid at the thought of that slimy mother-fucker Lieberman getting off scot-free that I wrote this to Harry Reid:
"I have been a loyal Democrat since I first voted in the midterm elections of 1974 when I turned 18 and lived in the city of Chicago. Being raised in Chicago, I live, eat and breathe politics. I busted my ass to try to get Barack Obama and the Democratic Congressional majority elected. And how am I and millions like me being repaid for our efforts? We are being told that the Senate is seriously considering letting that traitorous, slandering, McCain/Palin loving non-Democrat Joe Lieberman keep his chairmanship at Homeland Security. Do not tell me that Lieberman has not done any harm. He basically called Obama and progressive Dems terrorists for not agreeing with him, McCain and the Republicans. He needs to be PUNISHED! Obama did NOT say that he should keep his chairmanship, only that he should be allowed to caucus with the Dems. Give him a chair with some other committee, but do NOT give him the power to subpoena the Executive Branch, because Joe cannot be trusted as far as you can spit, and he will do great harm to the Obama presidency and the Democratic Party. A great majority of Dems are truly infuriated by the very thought of Lieberman going unpunished. Get rid of him, and if you are worried about Republican filibusters, then either eliminate the filibuster or force the Republicans to filibuster the old -fashioned way: in full view of the public, so the American people can see them trying to block much needed and popular legislation. JOE MUST GO! He is a traitor to the Democratic Party. Grow a spine, Senator Reid, or give your leadership position to someone else. Lieberman is no friend to the Dems, and he deserves to be kicked out as soon as possible. Let Mitch McConnell have him!"
I only hope everyone else does the same by writing their Dems Senators. It took nearly every fiber of my progressive Democratic being to keep the words "fuck", "prick", "dildo" and "douchenozzle" out of my letter, but next time I may not be able to.
Sir or Madam.......I salute you!! May I copy parts of this, then sign my name??
I told everyone that Lieberman was one of the "Untouchables".
(AIPAC).
"The US has an army of 90,000 soldiers in Afghanistan and is spending $100bn a year, but has still been unable to defeat 20,000-25,000 Taliban who receive no pay at all." - Patrick Cockburn
Lieberman's punishment is that he will never be President.
And he has a family connection to a man who should have been executed long ago for the biggest of the Unsolved Mysteries, a crime which was cleared (and should not have been) by political relatives of the murderer himself.
He really should be shucked like a roasting ear and thrown to the hogs.
as per usual with the cowardly assholes, I note that he is willing to buy the bullets but makes no mention of having the guts to actually pull the trigger to his eliminate his list of traitors.SO very typical of these wing nuts, all mouth no guts.
The Republican right wing is nothing short of a pack of lunatics. Their appeal is now diminished to vapid consumers , Bible-thumpers, and hate-filled bigots. If this is what the GOP wishes to become, with someone like Palin at the helm, then it may be the death knell of the party. It was astounding to see a some of the GOP brain trust abandon the party this year: Susan Eisenhower, Christopher Buckley, Colin Powell, etc. As a progressive, I never had a problem with REAL conservatives. Those who could disagree with my ideas, but never really wanted to vilify them or me as a person. It appears that only the most vicious, conniving, and greedy bastards are the ones left to guide the Republican Party, and may God have mercy on their souls.
http://americansillyparty.com/2008/11/09/pa-t...
These people are the consummate hypocrites. Quinn knows he is getting public funds for his show and chooses to ignore it. I recently was working for the Galveston hurricane relief effort, and while having a conversation with one of the contractors down there, he confessed to being a ditto-head. I bit my tongue trying not point out that while he championed the "privatize everything" idiocy that comes out of GOP mouthpieces like Limbaugh, he was receiving FEDERAL funds for his work in Galveston. Logic and reason are amazingly elusive for the Republican base.
This guy sounds like a another Conservative Chickenhawk who only knows the bravery of being out of range.
...commenting on the new front page thread?
Obama's Influence in the Sports World:
Why the Right Has a Big Decision to Make on Race
http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/draft-ri...
Or downloading the video?
Democrats are going to need to recognize that there are real limits to the current urgings of "bipartisanship." Because the fanatical right has no intention of dealing with Obama in good faith.
That's exactly right!
The Democratic definition of bipartisanship is working together to craft policy good for everyone.
The Republican definition of bipartisanship is Democrats making concessions to whatever Republicans want.
Since their so called Republican Revolution, they have operated on the understanding that Democrats were not legitimate governmental players, that cooperation is wrong. So they behaved like babies, and thought they were doing right. They have no intention of working in good faith.
Now that we have achieved the Democratic Restoration, we must recognize the attitude so many of them still maintain. They will continue to operate under the assumption that we have no right to be there in the first place.
Everyone is equally entitled to the pursuit of happiness. Wasn't that once self evident?
I hope Obama's wise to that, too, and takes hostages, or something, to ensure their good behavior...
Hold their children in pens in Cheney's undisclosed location, and threaten them with liberal indoctrination ... ]Deleted. Over the top. Site Monitor]...
Whay would anyone expect them to not be that on Nov 5th?
Never fear, Mr.Reagan will have his hands full "running out of those shadowed corners" as the new Attorney General turns over the Bush administration and arrest's Karl Rove for Contempt of Court and conspiracy as well as begin impeachment proceedings AND treasounous investigations against Bush, Cheney, Rumsfelt and Rice.
Reagan only has "selfish intentions". The "blues" should put the heat on the criminals and that'll leave Reagan blowing up. That's fine. He'll be so busy inciting riots we can bust him too. Along with Flush. Along with Hannity! Go after them with hand grenades! Almost counts! Get them! And protect our President!
As the father of two children we were blessed with though the adoption process, I found the reference to Michael Reagan's status as an adopted child to be an offensive non sequitur.
There are plenty of ways of creating a family these days. How a child came to be in a family is irrelevant. Families happen because those children were meant to be with those parents, by whatever mechanism. You wouldn't say "the (fertilized in vitro) son of a former President" or "the (surrogate-born) son of a former President." And you certainly wouldn't say it in the vaguely disparaging manner adoption was brought into this post.
How this got written and posted at a supposedly socially enlightened site is beyond me.
(I also left this comment at Open Left, where the post originated.)
"Government is the entertainment division of the military-industrial complex." - Frank Vincent Zappa
My husband was adopted also. His parents were like Ronnie and Nancy all about them. Forgetabout the kids. Nancy never treated her own children right and Michael was always an outsider just look at the way he was at President Reagan's funeral. Now we are living with the Atwater hate filled way to run for office. The republican party could never win on issues. Lee Atwater said that. Like Rove they find things that divide people. That is how they win. I wish the people in the south were smarter about that. I can't believe listen to Palin the last few days that she is the brightest bulb in the room. Surely the republicans can get an intelligent person. Now they are the party of idiots.
Southern Yankee
What I want to know is why he didn't enlist after 9/11? Like all the other big-mouth republican bullies who really like to shoot their mouths off about violence - as long as their asses are safe.
They're not sore losers because they lost the election, they're sore losers because they're losers. Period.
Obama has been saying it throughout the campaign: "Power never concedes willingly".
Why would anyone think they would just walk away with their tails between their legs?
They won't take him. He is to old and heavy.
Southern Yankee
Like Dick Cheney, another Vietnam era aged chicken-hawk who is the first to "uphold the honor" of our military.
Are these right wing nut jobs not going to be happy until there is an all out civil war here in the US? I don't think they know what will happen if they start their petty "he got a bj so let's impeach" crap again. This country is sitting on a powder keg and if the right wing nut jobs want a fight, I'm afraid that they will get one a heck of a lot bigger than they imagined.
Look for more from this ass muncher. Radio America is NOT renewing his contract for 2009.
Looks like he's trying to drum up free advertising as he scrambles to reinvent himself.
He's 63 so he's limited in options.
.......which would result in the permanent demise of the Greedy Old Party. Good riddance!
I've always thought of him as being a second-stringer right-winger....hey, that rhymes. Anyway, he doesn't seem to have a huge following. Seems like a sad little guy to me.
Okay, with that pic, now we all know that Michael Reagan has a small penis and was beat up alot in grade school.
Apparently, Ron Reagan Jr. is the intelligent offspring while Michael is the part that ran down the Gipper's leg after intercourse.
Democratic Party progressive, Vietnam veteran and proud Union member for 41 years
He probably just jumped through the open window of his Iroc-Z(with oversize rear tires) to pose for that shot.
BTW I sent a letter to a LT. asking him why he was a thug for haliburton. He answered my letter in typical fashion, but didn't call me a traitor or threaten to kill me.
I don't understand how he's considered legit. The right is allowed a pass, and these crazies are put on CNN and other reasonable networks as credible(Faux I can understand).
I am a traitor, I believe 911 was an inside job. You just try to take
me out, a 52 year old mother who has kept up with politics
her whole adult life. Micheal "Reagan", kiss my ass. Who pays your bills? I'm pretty sure I know.
The Republicans are like unruly toddlers throwing a tantrum in a department store.
They're like my students some days. Before anything goes awry, you lay down the law and let them know who's boss. Proceed from there. Once they know I'm boss, the "bipartisanship" goes well. (And then I can be easy going.)
far left loon >.<
Well the one thing he did get right is that that David highlighted bold. We do indeed need to make sure that "every illegal act is paid for with censure, impeachment, recalls, investigations, and jail time" for the criminals of the bush administration.
How do people get this detached from reality? Honestly, WTF!
If I were a psychopath, I would join the republican party, and get in on the gravy train taking the Teabircher morons to the cleaners.
"Really. Just find the people who are sending those letters to our troops to demoralize our troops and do what they are doing, you take them out, they are traitors to our country, and shoot them. You have a problem with that, deal with it. But anyone who would do that doesn't deserve to live. You shoot them. You call them traitors -- that's what they are -- and you shoot them dead. I'll pay for the bullet."
I guess he likes no Habeas Corpus . Spoken like a true Nazi.
What is your conceptual, continuity?
Reagan is a nut case but I wish the Dems had this attitude to legitimately go after Bush and the republicans. It is amazing that Reagan doesn’t see the blatant hypocrisy is in mindless thoughts
I'm taken by the complete similarity of what Reagan claims to be expecting from the Democrats to what we've seen from the Republicans for these last several years:
"taking lobbyists' money under the table, trading votes for campaign contributions, spying on and sabotaging Republican legislative plans, covering up their leaders' sexual "flings," and spending taxpayer money on personal expenses like never before"
Just change that "Republican" to "Democrat"and you've described history.
All I can say is: Michael, projection much?
The un-American way that Reagan speaks sounds like a good case for our new super hero...Michelle Bachmann...she will root out and punish the anti American Reagan, ahhh a trophy on her Joe McCathy/J Edgar Hoover/Roy Cohn wall of no shame
Reagan being a complete full of shit Ass-Hat was actually talking about his sick Reslug party and how they will keep losing elections with all the racist and bigoted pigs in the Reslug party.
Reagsn mentions several important anti-corruption issues, and I’m glad to see a Republican concerned about them…but where the hell was he during the past eight years? How many Bush administration criminals has he exposed? How much jail time does he support for them?
Or, more likely, is corruption only a problem when it’s not committed by conservatives?
I'm the only one who doesn't see a connection to what happened on 9/11 and why we are fighting in Iraq?
Thankfully, Obama is smart enough to know the 'thugs have no intention of working with him.
I would like to remind everyone something Chris Hedges said in American Fascists. He pointed out that if the tolerant tolerate everyone, they will eventually be defeated by the intolerant.
I am all for the new attitude Obama used and is using but we still must be on guard. Take a look at the ted nugent post above. Just another example of how crazy these right wing fringe are. I am open to considering there is a crazy left too but must ask someone to point out who they are. But again, as suggested in the post/article, these right wingers do not play nice and will not care about bi-partisanship.
Comments are closed on this entry