TOPICS

It's time to Impeach Judge Jay Bybee

Will you join me please and Sign the petition? With the revelations that Jay Bybee was in the middle of trying to legalize torture for the Bush administration, particularly with the evidence that he penned the disgusting torture memo in 2002, I fully support all efforts to have this man impeached. The OLC is supposed to give sound legal opinions to the executive branch, not bend the law to fit their sick world view which makes this all the more egregious.

As Jeffery Toobin writes in the New Yorker:

The first, and very chilling memo in the group is an analysis of the various techniques that were used by C.I.A. interrogators on Abu Zubaydah. The author of the memo, which is dated August 1, 2002, is Jay S. Bybee, who was the Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel. Bybee concludes that all of these various techniques, including waterboarding, do not constitute torture under American or international law.

Bybee is generally the forgotten man in torture studies of the Bush era. The best known of the legal architects of the torture regime is John Yoo, who was a deputy to Bybee. For better or worse, Yoo has been a vocal defender of the various torture policies, and he remains outspoken on these issues. But whatever happened to his boss?

Today, Bybee is a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He was confirmed by the Senate on March 13, 2003—some time before any of the “torture memos” became public. He has never answered questions about them, has never had to defend his conduct, has never endured anywhere near the amount of public scrutiny (and abuse) as Yoo. It is an understatement to say that he has kept a low profile since becoming a judge.

He certainly slipped under my radar. When you study men like Cheney, Yoo and David Addington---it's very easy for a man like Bybee to slip through the torture cracks. Now he's on the 9th circuit and for a man to be involved in one of the most revolting moral and ethical violations in American history, he has forfeited the right to be on the 9th circuit. The only thing left to figure out is how to do it.

The NY Times is also asking of Bybee to be impeached"

That investigation should start with the lawyers who wrote these sickening memos, including John Yoo, who now teaches law in California; Steven Bradbury, who was job-hunting when we last heard; and Mr. Bybee, who holds the lifetime seat on the federal appeals court that Mr. Bush rewarded him with.

These memos make it clear that Mr. Bybee is unfit for a job that requires legal judgment and a respect for the Constitution. Congress should impeach him. And if the administration will not conduct a thorough investigation of these issues, then Congress has a constitutional duty to hold the executive branch accountable. If that means putting Donald Rumsfeld and Alberto Gonzales on the stand, even Dick Cheney, we are sure Americans can handle it. After eight years without transparency or accountability, Mr. Obama promised the American people both. His decision to release these memos was another sign of his commitment to transparency. We are waiting to see an equal commitment to accountability.

Well, not surprising--it's up to us to do it and to push the tools we have at our disposal.

d-day has more:

And there is an actual mechanism, a way to leverage grassroots anger and push the elected officials who can make these decisions, at least in one case. We can prove the desire for accountability in the country and take a systematic approach to restore democracy and the rule of law. And it starts with Jay Bybee.

We've been talking about this, but I want to reiterate that the California Democratic Party can speak with one voice about this next week. Grassroots activists submitted a resolution to be decided at next week's convention in Sacramento that would call for the impeachment of Jay Bybee from the 9th Circuit. This resolution has already been accepted, UNANIMOUSLY, by the Los Angeles County Democratic Party. It can pass at the state level.

Impeachment would require a majority vote in the House, and removal would need a 2/3 vote in the trial in the Senate. I agree with Jonathan Zasloff that there are likely 34 Republicans in the Senate willing to go on record as objectively pro-torture, and thus removal would be less likely to be successful. I also agree that the Congress should be compelled to do this anyway.
{snip}

The Resolutions Committee meeting will be held at 3:00 on Friday, April 24, at the Sacramento Convention Center, 1400 J St., Sacramento, CA. If you're in the area or if you are a delegate, you can come to the meeting and advocate for the resolution. But the decision will likely be made beforehand. Only a few resolutions get out of committee and to the floor of the convention, and the others are tabled, or combined, or referred to a separate committee. We CANNOT let this happen. The leadership of the California Democratic Party needs to hear from constituents on this issue.

Sacramento Office
(916) 442-5707 phone
(916) 442-5715 fax

Los Angeles Office
(310) 407-0980 phone
(310) 407-0981 fax

email contact form

I've also created a petition at Petition Online urging the CDP to pass this.

Petition

We have an opportunity to use the party apparatus to push for accountability and send it up to leaders in Washington. I urge everyone to get on board with this. Thanks.

Let's get involved here. We are not chasing windmills because there is precedent for judges to be impeached. Will you join me?

Digby has more:

Following up on dday's idea to have the California Democratic Party follow the lead of a unanimous vote by the Los Angeles Dem party and pass a resolution to impeach Judge Jay Bybee, let me just emphasize that this is not an obscure, tilting at windmill exercise. The fact is that the Speaker of the House is from California and as dday points out below, there are numerous members of the house Judiciary Committee from California, Los Angeles in particular. Bybee is on the 9th circuit Court, which covers California. This is something where the state delegation should have plenty of juice if we can exert grassroots pressure for them to take action.

This is not unprecedented. Federal judges have been impeached for many reasons over the years and not just for personal indiscretions or corruption as some would like us to believe...read on



Login or Register to post comments.

30 comments
)O(

I'm not sure if this'll work,

But if it does, it'll be easier.

Just have the judges disbarred.

Can judges officiate if they can't legally practice law?

I signed it already. This is not the type of person we need making judgement of others.

I agree. Disbarment would be a much more efficient means of removing him. But disbarment is "iffy" sometimes though it has been successful at other times. From Wikipedia:

Generally disbarment is imposed as a sanction for conduct indicating that an attorney is not fit to practice law, willfully disregarding the interests of a client, or engaging in fraud which impedes the administration of justice. In addition, any lawyer who is convicted of a felony is automatically disbarred in most jurisdictions.

In the United States legal system, disbarment is specific to regions; one can be disbarred from some courts, while still being a member of the bar in another jurisdiction. However, under the American Bar Association's Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which have been adopted in most states, disbarment in one state or court is grounds for disbarment in a jurisdiction which has adopted the Model Rules.

Snip

Notable U.S. disbarments

The 20th Century saw one former U.S. president and one former U.S. vice-president disbarred, and another president be both suspended from one bar and resign from another bar rather than face disbarment.

Former Vice President Spiro Agnew, having pleaded no contest (which subjects a person to the same penalties as a guilty plea) to charges of bribery and tax evasion, was disbarred from Maryland, the state of which he had previously been governor.

Former President Richard Nixon was disbarred from New York in 1976[2] for obstruction of justice related to the Watergate scandal.

In 2001, former President Bill Clinton resigned from the Supreme Court bar rather than face near-certain disbarment, for perjury related to Lewinsky scandal[3]. In a separate, but related action, the Arkansas bar moved to disbar Clinton, but offered a deal that saw him suspended for five years.[4] Because he was allowed to reapply to the bar after the suspension ended in 2006, his punishment is not considered disbarment. Because disbarment is not always permanent[1], his punishment was functionally identical to disbarment.

Alger Hiss was disbarred for a felony conviction, but later became the first person reinstated to the bar in Massachusetts after disbarment. [5]

In 2007, Mike Nifong, the District Attorney of Durham County, North Carolina who presided over the 2006 Duke University lacrosse case, was disbarred for prosecutorial misconduct related to his handling of the case.[6]

Jack Thompson, the Florida lawyer noted for his activism against video game violence was permanently disbarred for various charges of misconduct. The action was the result of several grievances claiming that Thompson had made defamatory, false statements and attempted to humiliate, embarrass, harass or intimidate them. The order was made on September 25th 2008, effective October 25th. However, Thompson is attempting to appeal to the higher courts in order to avoid the penalty actually taking effect.[7].

Ed Fagan, a New York lawyer, originally getting celebrity status for his representation of Holocaust victims against Swiss banks, was disbarred in New York (in 2008)[8] and New Jersey (in 2009) for failing to pay court fines and fees and for stealing money from Holocaust survivors.

Ohio recently disbarred a judge.

Oklahoma disbarred a judge for using a "sex device" (not sure what it was).

So it looks like judges themselves can be disbarred from serving as judges.

... and I think it would work at the state level. But Bybee holds a constitutional post for life, and I believe that impeachment is the only removal mechanism.

I think you may be right.

Only 13 federal judges have been disbarred in US history, and it's been a result of impeachment or conviction of a crime.

If someone had standing to bring a criminal lawsuit against him for those memos, a lawsuit might be the quickest way to go. If it's left up to Congress, or the Senate, impeachment may fail. I wonder if the ACLU has such a standing?

We need a trial to establish the legal boundary for authorizing torture. I agree that it would be great to get him off the bench as soon as possible, but I hope that doesn't preclude impeachment if that keeps him off the bench forever AND doesn't allow his supporters to stew about how unfair and political his disbarment was.

I've got more info on Bybee here:
http://lostintarnation.blogspot.com/2009/04/y...

)O(

Disbarment would also produce possibly years of appeals, and in the meanwhile they could probably continue hearing cases.

put Bush in a box with some dung beetles just to see what happens!

)O(

Yeah...yeah...yeah...plop.

with that piece of dung!

)O(

Pinky and the Brain in an Egyptian pyramid:

Pinky: (Frightened) Ooh!

Brain: What the matter Pinky?

Pinky: (Nervously points).

Brain: Oh that's just a carving of a beetle. The ancient Egyptians used to worship them.

Pinky: Oh really, which one, Pete Best?

:)

It's just astonishing that Bybee is still on the bench.

It's time to boot him off, disbar him, and throw him in jail where he belongs. That goes for Yoo, Addington, Gonzalez, Cheney, etc, as well.

Unbelievable!

wouldn't it just be simpler to put everyone remotely connected to the Bush administration in prison?

It’s not torture unless there was intent to inflict LASTING harm. The fact that there were always medical personnel present exonerates those who did the torturing because that intent wasn’t there.

Hmmmmmm….

I was speeding, but I planned on slowing down eventually.

I kidnapped the baby, but intended to give it back.

I robbed the bank, but only wanted the 2 million to collect interest for a while. Then I was going to give the money back. There was no intent to KEEP the money, only the interest.

What say you, Judge Bybee?

I like the last one!

I gave it the Ol' Mr. Now What. Signature. Glad somebody is doing something.

.

They should be arrested and be awaiting trial.

It is in fact long past time to indict and try Bybee, Yoo, and the rest of the enablers for crimes against humanity and war crimes.

He was John Yoo's boss!

Just another hallmark of the CEO style presidency: credit flows up; responsibility flows down.

Why in the hell is it always US that has to do this stuff for everybody else?

I wrote a note directly, and signed the petition.

My own Rep (Barbara Lee) is good on these issues, and I suspect that Boxer would want to investigate. However, Feinstein and Pelosi are going to require a strong push.

If Congress doesn't investigate War Crimes such as torture, they are complicit.

Impeach, indict, convict and punish all who authorized, ordered and used torture. ALL OF THEM!

make the mafia look like innocent choirboys in comparison.

That's quite a smooth-running criminal racket they've got going on there. Somebody needs to stop them.

Justice weeps.

In the Black Bush's words, we should look forward and not hold anyone accountable for anything! And when the torture and murder of people held without charge for eternity continues, just look forward.

Was Obama a racehorse in a previous life? He sure has one healthy set of blinders on!

Start by disbarring him.

Please explain how a Lawyer, A lawyer that is hire by the President to be his Asst Attny Gen. How does he write the law and define its meaning?

He (Bybee) is an Atty? Not a Legislator nor a Judge?

..but there are two things that I'm pretty certain of at the moment:
1) Nobody is going to have to pay for their crime.
2) If no one pays, BHO will be a one-term President.
NO GUTS - NO GLORY!
The Dems are screwing the pooch with this one. We've only to wait a few years and there will be another President who will torture, who will violate international law and hey, who cares, W did it with impunity, that future President can do.

30 comments

Login or Register to post comments.