Serial Killer in South Carolina
By John Amato Sunday Jul 05, 2009 5:00pmSouth Carolina residents have been riveted by the unstable behavior of their Governor Mark Sanford, but they have other things to be very nervous about and they should be.
Terrified residents canceled Fourth of July plans and holed up in their homes Friday as investigators hunted a serial killer believed to have shot four people to death.
--Plenty of evidence links the killings, though officials have not yet determined how the victims are connected or if they knew whoever shot them, said Cherokee County Sheriff Bill Blanton.
"Yes, we have a serial killer," he said at a news conference in this rural community 50 miles south of Charlotte, N.C.
So far, all investigators have to go on is a sketch of a suspect and a description of a possible getaway vehicle, though police would not say who provided that information.
The latest victims were found in their family's small furniture and appliance shop near downtown Gaffney around closing time Thursday. Stephen Tyler, 45, was killed, and his 15-year-old daughter was shot and seriously injured. Tyler's wife, his older daughter and an employee found them in Tyler Home Center, County Coroner Dennis Fowler said.
A day earlier and about seven miles away, family members found the bodies of 83-year-old Hazel Linder and her 50-year-old daughter, Gena Linder Parker, bound and shot in Linder's home. Blanton would not say if Tyler and his daughter were also bound. The killing spree began last Saturday about 10 miles from Tyler Home Center, where peach farmer Kline Cash, 63, was found shot in his living room. Blanton said the killer may have first spoken with Cash's wife about buying hay. She left and came home a few hours later to find her husband's body. Investigators said it appears he was robbed, but they have not determined if anything was taken in the other killings.
The John Douglas book called Mind Hunter, is a pretty fascinating look (it gets interesting about 80 pages in) at how the FBI developed the profiling methods we see used today. Robert Ressler coined the term "Serial Killer," and also wrote a book about his experiences: Whoever Fights Monsters: My Twenty Years Tracking Serial Killers for the FBI. He interviewed many of these killers in jail to better understand their behavior. He was interviewed by Thomas Harris, who then wrote two of the greatest novels on the subject, Red Dragon and Silence of the Lambs. Both were made into excellent movies, (Who can forget Hannibal Lecter in Manhunter or SOTL's?) but South Carolina hopes that's not the case here. Let's hope he's caught quickly.









Login or Register to post comments.
I've been reading (and enjoying) C&L for years, but I must object to Mark Sanford being tagged in this post about a serial killer.
It didn't seem inappropriate to me, and I would be the first to bitch, ask anyone LOL!!
"I've been reading (and enjoying) C&L for years."
I don't think I've ever commented at C&L. I registered tonight to comment on this thread (and I figured 'meh, someday I may wanna say something else').
There's a notification about a madman killing people and the post is tagged (and thus associated with) Mark Sanford. Now I know if I saw similar shenanigans on right-wing blogs, linking an unrelated murder to a Democrat for example, I'd call them out because I think it's inappropriate at best and disingenuous at worst.
In short, this is me trying to hold blogs to a constant standard of discourse and integrity, regardless of political viewpoint.
What a killer book lol!! Still own it.
"Monsters aren't born, they are created"
I REALLY liked Manhunter, and the book Red Dragon is I believe beyond compare. The way he described how the killer first linked sex and death is perfect writing. Perfect. I don't read alot of fiction either, but to me it is a must read.
My heart goes out to the families of the victims. I hope they catch that guy. This is terrible.
I feel the same way, JohnnyB.
Me too.
Me as well. I hope Gaffney can return soon to the days when the giant peach "butt" watertower is the most interesting thing about it.
This is horrible.
This is a spree killer -- someone who murders a large number of people in a short amount of time.
A serial killer murders the same type of victim in the same type of way over and over again for a reason or motivation that makes sense to only to the killer.
Like Andrew Cunanon, who was one of the more famous spree killers
Malvo and Muhammad come to mind. Killing for the thrill of it.
lived painful and confused lives that substituted simple bonding for mock discipline.
A big dirt hill at Fred Enke golf course still stands as a reminder that at least life wants to go on.
they've got the time
they've got the need
the worlds getting weird
the wolfs running free
but that's another story
this is their story
By definition, a serial killer also experiences a "cooling off" period between the killings.
At least with the information available so far, it seems more like a spree killer than a serial killer, but even that's up in the air at this point.
At the first scene, it appears there was also a robbery. If the murder was incidental, and robbery was the motive, then it's a different situation than if the motive was murder and the robbery was incidental. There's not enough info available on the second and third killings to guess at the motive.
.
Guardian UK: 15-year-old girl becomes fifth victim of South Carolina serial killer in a week
Anybody seen Dick Cheney lately?
...Come from a background that, if it
includes politics to any degree,
is almost always right-leaning,
or out & out Konservative.
True, that.
I'm leaving this week to spend some time visiting my sister in Greenville, SC. Maybe the guy will get caught or move on to Tennessee or Georgia or somewhere before I get there.... #;}
If I remember correctly one of the first cases or the first case John Douglas worked on which his deep intuition appeared to him and helped him with a case, something about a trailer house, was in South Carolina.
Also if anyone is familiar with the TV series Millennium a lot of the episodes were taken verbatim from a couple of Douglas's books Mindhunter and...I forget the name of the other one. Lance Henrickson as a dark version of John Douglas was really mesmerizing.
First season was outstanding...then after that...meh....
Any series titled "Millennium" and using the actual millennium as a premise is bound to jump the shark in short order. Which is a shame, because Lance Henrickson was excellent.
John Douglas' book was interesting, but I have yet to see any real substantiated proof that the criminal profiling that he and others developed at the FBI is actually accurate. After silence of the lambs Douglas and others were essentially hailed as geniuses and could do no wrong. But their record ended up being sort of like astrology; no one forgets their misses. Remember the unabomber? Remember the FBI profiles that were made public in the late 90s before his capture where he was described as a clean-freak, fastidious man who probably didn't have a college education...? You didn't hear the FBI backtracking when Harvard educated Kaczinski was found living in a tiny, filthy shack... because NO ONE ever called them onto the carpet for their blunders. But this same profile dictated the direction of the FBI for years in their search for the unabomber; a direction that was completely wrong.
Personally I think that criminal profiling CAN have a lot to offer; but let's not elevate it into some sort of absolute science because it can become a real problem when we start to accept it unquestioningly.
I don't know if posting links is kosher on the boards, but here's an article I wrote for my college paper 12 years ago (the week after the unabomber arrest):
http://web.archive.org/web/20000930111624/www...
Well, maybe more than one. It's really more of an art than a science. An art based on a lot of science and research, but still an art.
The biggest problem is that the media has over-emphasized profiling and inflated it into something that it was never intended to be. (The CSI effect, before CSI came along, maybe?) It's a tool, nothing more or less. It can be useful, but it's not something that can be the be-all and end-all of an investigation.
The FBI definitely made some mistakes with the Unabomber. But was it also the FBI that suggested that the linguistics would be key when Kaczinski wanted his manifesto published? If so, they may have redeemed themselves.
Criminal profiling - it will be a male with a gun and an attitude.
The gun death rate in this country is as certain as a clock ticking, 25,000 a year. The only absolute science is the USA has the highest gun homicide rate and the most guns per capita in the world.
We've got the most shooters and the least readers. This is wrong.
That's REALLY close to my family...NC is only a few miles away...
Login or Register to post comments.