Go Home

Meet RINO Reagan

This weekend, Republicans marked the 100th birthday of Ronald Reagan with speeches celebrating his small government philosophy, anti-tax fervor and hard-line foreign policy. But if Reagan was a GOP candidate today, he would doubtless fall victim to violations of his own 11th Commandment, "Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican." Because despite all of the right-wing hagiography, Ronald Reagan ballooned the national debt, repeatedly raised taxes, signed abortion rights legislation and negotiated with terrorists in Iran. For those and so many other perceived offenses, the GOP rank and file - and especially its purity-demanding Tea Partiers - would today brand a reanimated Ronald Reagan a Republican in Name Only.

Meet RINO Reagan:

  1. Reagan tripled the national debt
  2. Reagan raised taxes 11 times
  3. Reagan expanded the size of government
  4. Reagan supported the "socialist" Earned Income Tax Credit
  5. Reagan negotiated with terrorists in Tehran
  6. Reagan sought to eliminate nuclear weapons
  7. Reagan gave amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants
  8. Reagan approved protectionist trade barriers
  9. Reagan signed abortion rights law in California
  10. Reagan eventually debunked AIDS myths Republicans continued to perpetuate

1. Reagan Tripled the National Debt. As most analysts predicted, Reagan's massive $749 billion supply-side tax cuts in 1981 quickly produced even more massive annual budget deficits. Combined with his rapid increase in defense spending, Reagan delivered not the balanced budgets he promised, but record-settings deficits. Even his OMB alchemist David Stockman could not obscure the disaster with his famous "rosy scenarios."

Forced to raise taxes twice to avert financial catastrophe, the Gipper nonetheless presided over a tripling of the American national debt to nearly $3 trillion. By the time he left office in 1989, Ronald Reagan more than equaled the entire debt burden produced by the previous 200 years of American history. It's no wonder Stockman lamented last year:

"[The] debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts."

Sarah Palin's revisionist history Friday notwithstanding, it was Reagan who put the United States on "the road to ruin."

2. Reagan Raised Taxes 11 Times
As ThinkProgress noted, the inedible image of Ronald Reagan the tax cutter is "false mythology." (It is also worth noting that it was President Obama and not Reagan who delivered the largest two year tax cut in American history.) While Governor Reagan doubled California's state spending and signed the biggest tax hike up to that point, as President he raised taxes in seven of his eight years in office. As former GOP Senator Alan Simpson, who called Reagan "a dear friend," told NPR, "Ronald Reagan raised taxes 11 times in his administration -- I was there."

3. Reagan Expanded the Size of Government
On Friday, Sarah Palin told the Reaganauts assembled by the Young Americans for Freedom, "We need to stop spending and cut government back down to size." If that's the case, her role model should be Democrat Bill Clinton and not Republican Ronald Reagan.

As USA Today pointed out five years ago, measured as a percentage of gross domestic product, average annual federal spending dropped far more under Bill Clinton (-1.8%) than Ronald Reagan (-0.6%). And as Slate's Michael Kinsley explained ten years ago in marking Reagan's 90th birthday:

Federal government spending was a quarter higher in real terms when Reagan left office than when he entered. As a share of GDP, the federal government shrank from 22.2 percent to 21.2 percent--a whopping one percentage point. The federal civilian work force increased from 2.8 million to 3 million. (Yes, it increased even if you exclude Defense Department civilians. And, no, assuming a year or two of lag time for a president's policies to take effect doesn't materially change any of these results.)

Under eight years of Big Government Bill Clinton, to choose another president at random, the federal civilian work force went down from 2.9 million to 2.68 million. Federal spending grew by 11 percent in real terms--less than half as much as under Reagan. As a share of GDP, federal spending shrank from 21.5 percent to 18.3 percent--more than double Reagan's reduction, ending up with a federal government share of the economy about a tenth smaller than Reagan left behind.

As the Gipper's biographer Lou Cannon aptly summed it up, "He was no Tea Partier."

4. Reagan Supported the "Socialist" Earned Income Tax Credit
Both during and after the 2008 presidential campaign, Republican candidates and commentators blasted Barack Obama's proposals to offer Americans expanded tax credits as "socialism", "welfare" and worse. If so, they should also be directing their ire at Ronald Reagan.

While virtually all working Americans pay the Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes (levies increased by President Reagan), many don't pay federal income tax thanks to the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). As the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities noted in 2005, the EITC was not only very successful in lowering poverty, the provision "has enjoyed substantial bipartisan support. President Reagan, President George H. W. Bush, and President Clinton all praised it and proposed expansions in it."

While many of his conservative heirs now express disdain for the working poor, Ronald Reagan championed the refundable Earned Income Tax Credit. As the American Prospect recalled in 2006:

Almost 20 years ago, as he signed into law the tax bill expanding the Earned Income Tax Credit, President Ronald Reagan hailed it as "the best anti-poverty, the best pro-family, the best job creation measure to come out of Congress."

5. Reagan Negotiated with Terrorists in Tehran.
Criticizing President Obama as weak on Iran, Sarah Palin declared in December that "just as Ronald Reagan once denounced an 'evil empire' and looked forward to a time when communism was left on the 'ash heap of history,' we should look forward to a future where the twisted ideology and aggressive will to dominate of Khomeini and his successors are consigned to history's dustbin."

That would be the same Ronald Reagan whose policy consisted of giving the mullahs in Iran a cake, a Bible - and U.S. arms.

The Iran-Contra scandal, as you'll recall, almost laid waste to the Reagan presidency. Desperate to free U.S. hostages held by Iranian proxies in Lebanon, President Reagan provided weapons Tehran badly needed in its long war with Saddam Hussein (who, of course, was backed by the United States). In a clumsy and illegal attempt to skirt U.S. law, the proceeds of those sales were then funneled to the contras fighting the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. And as the New York Times recalled, Reagan's fiasco started with an emissary bearing gifts from the Gipper himself, including "a Bible with a handwritten verse from President Reagan for Iranian leaders" and "and a key-shaped cake to symbolize the anticipated ''opening'' to Iran.'"

The rest, as they say, is history. After his initial denials, President Reagan was forced to address the nation on March 4, 1987 and acknowledge he indeed swapped arms for hostages (video here):

"A few months ago I told the American people I did not trade arms for hostages. My heart and my best intentions still tell me that's true, but the facts and the evidence tell me it is not. As the Tower board reported, what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages."

6. Reagan Sought to Eliminate Nuclear Weapons
In late 2010, hard-line Republicans opposed President Obama's new START treaty calling for joint reductions in the American and Russian nuclear stockpiles. Sadly for GOP hawks, it was Ronald Reagan and not Barack Obama who declared, "m]y dream...became a world free of nuclear weapons."

And as the Washington Monthly recalled in 2003, Reagan's idealism startled and shocked his advisers and allies:

Driven by this dream, Reagan embraced Mikhail Gorbachev and initiated a series of negotiations that ultimately alarmed everyone in his administration. Hardliners like Patrick Buchanan, Richard Perle, and Caspar Weinberger reacted in horror to the very idea of engaging the Soviets in such talks, warning against the "grand illusion" of peace. "Reagan is a weakened president, weakened in spirit as well as clout," echoed New Right leader Paul Weyrich in The Washington Post. Administration pragmatists like George Shultz and Robert McFarlane, who supported negotiations but believed in deterrence, were shocked by how far Reagan took them. At the Reykjavik summit, he and Gorbachev almost agreed to the "zero option" to eliminate both sides' thermonuclear arms. Reagan's unwillingness to give up his cherished missile-defense program doomed the agreement, though the talks did yield the signature arms-reduction pact of his presidency, the 1987 INF treaty.

7. Reagan Gave Amnesty to Millions of Illegal Immigrants
Codifying the growing xenophobia within the Republican Party, the 2008 GOP platform insisted:

"We oppose amnesty. The rule of law suffers if government policies encourage or reward illegal activity. The American people's rejection of en masse legalizations is especially appropriate given the federal government's past failures to enforce the law."

Which is why, as ThinkProgress again helpfully highlighted, conservatives are now so eager to hush up RINO Reagan's history on immigration:

Reagan signed into law a bill that made any immigrant who had entered the country before 1982 eligible for amnesty. The bill was sold as a crackdown, but its tough sanctions on employers who hired undocumented immigrants were removed before final passage. The bill helped 3 million people and millions more family members gain American residency. It has since become a source of major embarrassment for conservatives.

8. Reagan Approved Protectionist Trade Barriers
Ronald Reagan believed in free markets and free trade. Except when he didn't.

In 2004, Alan Tonelson praised what he called Reagan's "trade realism":

Reagan's tactics were flexible. In autos, machine tools, and steel, his administration subjected foreign producers to so-called voluntary export restraints. In semiconductors, Reagan officials negotiated an agreement to secure a specific share of the Japanese market for U.S. companies, and then imposed tariffs on Japanese electronics imports when Tokyo briefly refused to keep a promise to halt semiconductor dumping.

But it was Reagan's decisive intervention to save legendary American motorcycle maker Harley Davidson which drew the ire of conservatives at the time, if not now. The libertarian Cato Institute groused about the 49.4% import tariff on foreign motorcycles Reagan authorized in 1983:

Last spring, the import duties on large motorcycles were raised drastically. By any economic criterion, the new tariff is counterproductive, and the Reagan administration was fully aware of it. The decision is thus an interesting case study in the political economy of protectionism.

9. Reagan Signed Abortion Rights Law in California
Despite his paeans to the pro-life crowd, RINO Reagan did very little to advance their radical anti-abortion agenda. As ThinkProgress summarized his record on reproductive rights:

As governor of California in 1967, Reagan signed a bill to liberalize the state's abortion laws that "resulted in more than a million abortions." When Reagan ran for president, he advocated a constitutional amendment that would have prohibited all abortions except when necessary to save the life of the mother, but once in office, he "never seriously pursued" curbing choice.

10. Reagan Eventually Debunked AIDS Myths Republicans Continued to Perpetuate
Not wanting to anger his allies on the Christian right when it came to what they deemed the "gay plague," Reagan remained silent on the exploding AIDS epidemic throughout most of his presidency. And when he did speak up in 1985 (as he did at the urging of staffer and future Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts), Reagan ignored both basic science and basic compassion in setting back the cause of truth and public health:

"I'm glad I'm not faced with that problem today [sending children to school where another student has AIDS] and I can well understand the plight of the parents and how they feel about it...And yet medicine has not come forth unequivocally and said 'This we know for a fact, that it is safe.' And until they do I think we have to do the best we can with this problem. I can understand both sides of it."

The next day, the head of the Centers for Disease Control and the chief scientists at the National Institutes of Health called a news conference to correct President Reagan's tragic error and confirm that AIDS was a blood-borne sexually transmitted disease not spread by casual contact. In what would be the first high-impact celebrity intervention among Republicans, it took a plea from Elizabeth Taylor to get Ronald Reagan to deliver a speech at the 1987 meeting of amfAR, the American Foundation for AIDS Research:

As dangerous and deadly as AIDS is, many of the fears surrounding it are unfounded. These fears are based on ignorance... The Public Health Service has stated that there's no medical reason for barring a person with the virus from any routine school or work activity. There's no reason for those who carry the AIDS virus to wear a scarlet A. AIDS is not a casually contagious disease. We're still learning about how AIDS is transmitted, but experts tell us you don't get it from telephones or swimming pools or drinking fountains. You don't get it from shaking hands or sitting on a bus or anywhere else, for that matter. And most important, you don't get AIDS by donating blood. Education is critical to clearing up the fears. Education is also crucial to stopping the transmission of the disease.

Five years later, future Arkansas Governor and current GOP White House frontrunner Mike Huckabee still hadn't got the message. As a Senate candidate in 1992, he called homosexuality "an aberrant, unnatural, and sinful lifestyle, and we now know it can pose a dangerous public health risk." Huckabee then called for Huckabee called for draconian - and discriminatory - action:

"If the federal government is truly serious about doing something with the AIDS virus, we need to take steps that would isolate the carriers of this plague.

It is difficult to understand the public policy towards AIDS. It is the first time in the history of civilization in which the carriers of a genuine plague have not been isolated from the general population, and in which this deadly disease for which there is no cure is being treated as a civil rights issue instead of the true health crisis it represents."

Fourteen years later, Senate Majority Leader and physician Bill Frist declined to say whether he thought HIV-AIDS could be transmitted through tears or sweat, as a disputed federal education program championed by some conservative groups had suggested.

(For more debunking of the right-wing mythology surrounding Ronald Reagan, see these recent articles from the Washington Post, CNN, ThinkProgress and CBS. For the definitive account of the conservative revisionist history project, see Will Bunch's excellent book, Tear Down This Myth.)

(This piece also appears at Perrspectives.)

Share This Post

Link To This Post


49 Comments
DaveZ's picture

Believers, through and through. Usually the myths aren't anywhere near reality.

and every person past and present who has ever been in the United Farm Workers. I send a bit of virtual spit his grave's way.


"The greatest tyranny is censoring information in order to be better able to control people." - Cristina Saralegui

Seriously's picture

I wish I had paid more attention to this era of history (I was 12-18). Oh well, go Steelers!!!

fil hussein oaks's picture

May the dipsh1t MF rest in pieces and never visit this planet again - especially as a zombie!

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

What do vegetarian zombies eat?


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

Liberal AND Proud's picture

Bush


Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.

fastfeat's picture

.


"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."

---Southwest Airlines

DaveZ's picture

Reagan's biggest legacy was the lie that is "trickle-down" economics.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- For charities hoping to land a big gift from one of America's wealthiest individuals, 2010 was a very bad year.

The 54 most generous donors in America gave only $3.3 billion in 2010, the smallest sum since 2000, according to a ranking compiled by The Chronicle of Philanthropy and Slate magazine.

And not many of those 54 donors are members of the premium tier of net-worth individuals. Of the 400 wealthiest Americans ranked by Forbes magazine, only 17 appeared on this year's list of the most-generous donors.

Source:
CNNMoney

Liberal AND Proud's picture

The 54 most generous donors in America gave only $3.3 billion in 2010, the smallest sum since 2000, according to a ranking compiled by The Chronicle of Philanthropy and Slate magazine.

All that talk about how charitable donations would take up the slack of cut programs...another...and possibly the most heinous of the big lies of "trickle down" bullshitomics.


Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.

me. TimJoeBillyBob was one of the ones who said that conservatives would give to charity to help the poor if they were weren't taxed to help with social programs.

The day I trust conservatives to do that is the day I die, and it will because I will be dead and there will be nothing I can do about it when conservatives inevitably give that the lie.


"The greatest tyranny is censoring information in order to be better able to control people." - Cristina Saralegui

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

The problem is that when the wealthier give they give wealthier amounts sometimes for good, but also for publicity and/or tax breaks.

But experts say on charitable giving that is still an insufficient amount since the ray gunn years essentially made the kind of contributions the middle and working classes give non-charitable. unless it goes well over the exemption amount, thus putting the kibosh on their giving, particularly when the economy is so bad they're having to choose between food, bills and shoes if they're lucky enough to have any kind of job.


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

Liberal AND Proud's picture

But de-regulation was gonna make us RICH! RICH I tells ya!

Money market funds!! 401Ks! No more need for Social Security!

The upper class would grow...the middle would widen...the lower classes disappear.

It was gonna be NIRVANA!! All it would take is for Atlas to shrug!!


Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.

have to give before it's considered on your taxes, but most people give little bits of money, or they give second hand goods usually, and it doesn't often add up to $250 for people who are poor but wish they could give...


"The greatest tyranny is censoring information in order to be better able to control people." - Cristina Saralegui

CaliforniaMike's picture

... tickle-down economics and would be great fun for all.


CaliforniaMike blogs at All Voices and at his own blogs, http://www.mikerappaport.net/onevoice and at http://oneminutewithmike.blogspot.com.

assholes who say we shouldn't tax the rich too much or not give them tax breaks for giving to charity because then they won't give to charity. It isn't charity if the super-wealthy will only give under certain circumstances or are expecting something in return, is it?

I'm not sure my thought really belongs with yours, but I had to get it out.


"The greatest tyranny is censoring information in order to be better able to control people." - Cristina Saralegui

Liberal AND Proud's picture

Happy Anniversary. I drink to his death.


Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.

CaliforniaMike's picture

I remember I called in to a radio talk show in 1985 (local in St. Louis) where the host was raving about how Nancy Reagan had turned down the $50,000 from the government for remodeling the White House and had done it through private donations from friends. I pointed out that she had spent $500,000, and the friends were in the 50 percent tax bracket, so it actually had cost the government $250,000 in lost tax receipts.

The host said, "That's very ungracious of you."


CaliforniaMike blogs at All Voices and at his own blogs, http://www.mikerappaport.net/onevoice and at http://oneminutewithmike.blogspot.com.

dadams's picture

sarah will always be a stupid dumbfuck.
she does not know the difference between
summers eve and a sparking cider.

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

Or a douche.


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

Captain Kangaroo's picture

This is why people like Limbaugh say

"...you illustrate that people like you just have to be defeated, not met halfway and gotten along with."

When their hypocrisy is thrown in their face they want to shut you up. I would love for somebody, preferably me, get Palin is a room and Katie Curic her on this subject. Now that would be priceless. Can you imagine the word salad Palin would spew with these facts thrown in her face?

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

Then why didn't our Founding Fathers ever fully prosecute Benedict Arnold?


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

word salad. They just have to....

Hmm.....


"The greatest tyranny is censoring information in order to be better able to control people." - Cristina Saralegui

Captain Kangaroo's picture

This whole Ronald Reagan rewrite is disgusting. As disgusting as his funeral week was. Reagan is the reason, is the catalyst of why our country is so so so screwed up today. Reagan's policies are the foundation of what is wrong with the economy right now and that is the foundation of what is wrong with the country in general. Reagan's power trip is the foundation of why Bush thought is was just fine and dandy to invade Iraq. There is a huge PR team behind the Reagan history. They have rewritten his legacy with half truths and nonsense. At least Palin's rewrite is almost comical.

cxrc's picture

Not to mention that the coward cut-and-ran from Lebanon.

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

American hostages kept in Iran for 444 days, and the "liberal" msm constantly reminding us.

During the ray gunn years American hostages were kept in Lebanon for nearly 7 years, or 2,555 days

And not a word from the media.


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

Phoenix Justice's picture

Though a lot of people like to focus on his presidency, which I am somewhat guilty, we tend to forget that he was president of another organization, a union in fact. Take a look at today's posting on my blog: Ronald Reagan, The Traitor to see what the conservatives will never talk about in regards to Saint Ronny.


Election 2012: Be Educated! Be Active! Vote!

www.PhoenixJustice.com

Raygun ceremony.

Hey, biatch-- they're tellin' ya sumthin'...


"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."

---Southwest Airlines

JohnnyBravo's picture

was awful and his fanatical followers are awful. Also, this is Ignore Sarah Palin Month.

That is all.


NOBODY 2012

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

The shortest month of the year?


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

JohnnyBravo's picture

That's true :-(


NOBODY 2012

mrpop's picture

just how do you think the gays will be treated under shiria law?

Wesley E. Ledjennes's picture

Last night at a Univ. of Texas San Antonio BB game... I sat behind a (big fat) guy with a bright orange sweatshirt with a Rush Limbaugh promo slug on the back it said...

"Your Tropical Retreat from the Stress of Jihad... wwwRushLimbaugh.com"

I was tempted to dump popcorn on his head all night, because even the T-SHIRT is a LIE! Rush has been one of the LOUDEST fear-mongers in broadcasting... and he has the nerve to say his show is a "retreat" from fear over the jihad... WHAT Bull Shit!

fastfeat's picture

where fatfuck lives, ain't tropical either; it's subtropical.


"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."

---Southwest Airlines

JohnnyBravo's picture

He knows his (ignorant) audience.


NOBODY 2012

xoites defends Constitution's picture
JohnnyBravo's picture

Bless you :-)


NOBODY 2012

fastfeat's picture

MsJoanne made an appearance recently too.

Still in Nevada? Hope all is well...


"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."

---Southwest Airlines

Sid Schwab's picture

Here is the link.

Its Me's picture

Here are a few more...

1. Reagan did NOT intherit a recession from Jimmy Carter. The 4th quarter 1980 Gross Domestic Product annualized growth rate was +7.6%. Followed by a 1st quarter 1981 Gross Domestic Product annualized growth rate of +8.6%. Any Democrat taking over from any Republican should only be so lucky.

2. Reagan did NOT inherit a growing inflation rate with increasing interest rates from Carter. Jimmy Carter's 1979 Fed Chairman appointee Paul Volker raised Fed Funds Rates (which raised interest rates) in order to tame hyper-inflation as soon as he took control of the Fed. His method worked. Beginning in March 1980, annualized inflation began to steadily decline, month-over-month, for the first time in years. That would be almost a year before Ronald Reagan took office. Reagan had nothing to do with reducing inflation. Carter appointed Paul Volker knowing full well that he would have to purposely induce a brief, early 1980 recession by raising interest rates...in order to cool down an overheated economy under Jimmy Carter, who had presided over record or near record private-sector job gains during his presidency.

3. Reagan did NOT inherit a "double-digit" unemployment rate from Jimmy Carter. Jimmy Carter NEVER had a double-digit unemployment rate. The highest unemployment rate during the Carter years was a one month 7.8% rate at the height of Fed Chairman Paul Volker's purposely induced brief early 1980 recession to reduce inflation and cool down Carter's overheated economy. On the contrary, Ronald Reagan inherited a DECLINING unemployment rate from Jimmy Carter. Carter's unemployment rate topped out at that one 7.8% rate in July of 1980 and was steadily declining into the low 7s when Reagan took office.

4. All of the above IMPROVING economic conditions Ronald Reagan inherited from Jimmy Carter (better than ANY economic conditions inherited by ANY Democratic president from ANY Republican president, btw) reversed and began to turn sour in a big way LATE in Ronald Reagan's first year in office and worsened over the next couple of years, after his favorite Republican Supply-Side/Trickle Down policies were firmly in place.

mrpop's picture

Dont know if you lived through Carter, but I did and the reason the 3 years of no work, the 14% home rates and 19% loan rates. What a great time it was. Carter will go down in history as a good man, but by far the worse President of the century if not ever!!!

Its Me's picture

I was very much alive and active in the labor force during the Carter years.

You spent 3 years out of work during the greatest private-sector job creation presidency of all time (Carter) with the possible exception of LBJ?

Sorry to hear you fell between the cushions during those job creation boomtimes. Why do you think the inflation arc was so virulent then? How about because there was too much wage inflation going on at the time. Suppliers could only charge more for their products and services because people, their customers, were getting paid more. And you don't get wage inflation during times of high unemployment and anemic jobs creation. Quite the opposite.

Btw, neither high mortgage/loan rates nor high inflation = "bad economy" any more than low mortgage/loan rates and low inflation = "good economy".

To illustrate...we had 8 Bush years of extremely low mortage/loan rates and low to non-existent inflation. That would seem to be an anti-Carter, pro-Reagan economic nirvana, right? How great was the economy during the George W. Bush years? The economy sucked during the Bush years, didn't they?

They sucked a lot more than the Carter years as any measure of the economy will show. I know the Reaganite Republicans run to the "Carter had high inflation and high loan rates" as their great boogeyman because they cannot think of anything else to criticize about his astonishingly successful private-sector job creating presidency. But right now this recovery is desperate for some "inflation" and a justification for higher loan rates. They are signs of a booming economy, not signs of a weak one.

Kreskin's picture

Is there anything that the Republicans don't twist , distort , reinvent and lie about ? Anything ?


Insanity , it is what it is , there is no understanding it .

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

The Twist is eviiillll...


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

james in Philadelphia's picture

If I could get near it, I'd gladly pee on Reagan's grave. I will never forgive that man for ignoring the AIDS situation and for giving the whack job christers legitimacy.

If there is a hell, Ronnie is in it.

Mugsy's picture

Let's not forget he "cut & run" from Beirut, and engaged in endless Nation Building in South America with a string of incursions into El Salvador, Nicaragua, Grenada, Panama, etc.


* There are two types of Republicans: millionaires and suckers.
"Mugsy's Rap Sheet": Recording history for those who seek to rewrite it.

mcnairbo's picture

So the new heir to the godlike Reagan throne is Sarah Palin? Poor Ronnie must be rolling over. Wow! They got nothin'.

mrpop's picture

Reagan was too damn nice!! When the spend and spend liberal sent him budget bills he should have vetoed them!!

jgjspy's picture

He let 238 Marines go unavenged

Comments are closed on this entry