The Republican Debt Orgy in Pictures
(Click here for larger image.)
"In Washington more spending and more debt is business as usual," House Speaker John Boehner declared on Monday before warning, "I've got news for Washington - those days are over." The days, Boehner should have explained, before Barack Obama took the oath of office. As Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) rightly pointed on the Senate floor last year, "We would have none of this if it hadn't been for the Republican debt orgy that they went through." Which is exactly right. As a few handy charts show, Republican presidents and the current GOP leadership in Congress presided over that debt debauchery. And now they demand Democrats clean up their mess.
In case Americans had forgotten that Ronald Reagan tripled the national debt and George W. Bush doubled it, the New York Times presented the helpful reminder above.
For their part, Republicans want to pretend history began on January 20, 2009. While Texas Rep. Jeb Hensarling claimed Friday that for Republicans raising the debt ceiling is "contrary to our DNA," House Minority Leader Eric Cantor protested two weeks ago, "I don't think the White House understands is how difficult it is for fiscal conservatives to say they're going to vote for a debt ceiling increase."
As McClatchy showed, Republicans are as bad at genetics and history as they are at economics:
Leave aside for the moment that small government icon Ronald Reagan signed 17 debt ceiling increases into law. (That might explain why the Gipper repeatedly demanded Congress boost his borrowing authority and called the oceans of red ink he bequeathed to America his greatest regret.) As it turns out, Republican majorities voted seven times to raise the debt ceiling under President Bush and the current GOP leadership team voted a combined 19 times to bump the debt limit $4 trillion during his tenure. (That vote tally included a "clean" debt ceiling increase in 2004, backed by 98 current House Republicans and 31 sitting GOP Senators.)
Of course, they had to. After all, the two unfunded wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the budget-busting Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 (the first war-time tax cut in modern U.S. history) and the Medicare prescription drug program drained the U.S. Treasury. Mitch McConnell, John Boehner and Eric Cantor voted for all of it.
Again, in words and pictures, the New York Times tells the tale:
As the Washington Post summed up the CBO's conclusions regarding the causes of the nation's mounting debt earlier this year, "The biggest culprit, by far, has been an erosion of tax revenue triggered largely by two recessions and multiple rounds of tax cuts." The analysis by the Times echoed that finding:
With President Obama and Republican leaders calling for cutting the budget by trillions over the next 10 years, it is worth asking how we got here -- from healthy surpluses at the end of the Clinton era, and the promise of future surpluses, to nine straight years of deficits, including the $1.3 trillion shortfall in 2010. The answer is largely the Bush-era tax cuts, war spending in Iraq and Afghanistan, and recessions.
But as Ezra Klein explained in the Washington Post, the revealing Times chart doesn't tell the full story of the impact of Bush-era policies on future debt facing Barack Obama:
What's also important, but not evident, on this chart is that Obama's major expenses were temporary -- the stimulus is over now -- while Bush's were, effectively, recurring. The Bush tax cuts didn't just lower revenue for 10 years. It's clear now that they lowered it indefinitely, which means this chart is understating their true cost. Similarly, the Medicare drug benefit is costing money on perpetuity, not just for two or three years. And Boehner, Ryan and others voted for these laws and, in some cases, helped to craft and pass them.
These two graphs from the Washington Post and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities make that point crystal clear. Analyses by CBPP showed that the Bush tax cuts accounted for half of the deficits during his tenure, and if made permanent, over the next decade would cost the U.S. Treasury more than Iraq, Afghanistan, the recession, TARP and the stimulus - combined.
Utah Senator Orrin Hatch was telling the truth when he described Republican fiscal mismanagement during the Bush years by acknowledging, "It was standard practice not to pay for things."
As Paul Krugman documented, the jump in federal spending as a percentage of GDP under President Obama is almost completely explained by the contraction of the economy and the stimulus programs now ending. (Republicans always take great to care to avoid mentioning that the total federal tax burden as a percentage of the U.S. economy is at its lowest level in 60 years even as income inequality is at its highest in 80.) As Krugman summed it up:
Now, pointing out the Obama spending binge is a myth generally produces rage: people know that it happened, because Rush Limbaugh and the Wall Street Journal say so. But that doesn't make it true.
Put another way, when it comes to the American balance sheet, Republicans broke it. Now, they claim, Democrats own it.
(This piece also appears at Perrspectives.)








. . . need to come clean on what percent of this debt they voted for AND why they need to vote AGAIN to pay for their bills. If this was really about debt, then Reagan-like tax increases would be needed.
SATSQ:
Never, that's when.
And the MSM is either cowered, compliant, or complicit in the cover-up.
I hope it wakes a lot of people up.
The internet is full of bogus 'American patriots', posting from places like Latvia, Qatar, and Nigeria.
They did that with Clinton and Clinton cleaned up their mess and they turned around and gave tax cuts to t he richest people in the world and started borrowing and borrowing and borrowing again.
Throwing Lavish eight year long parties for themselves and their wealthy benefactors, and then handing the bill to the Democrats on the way out the door.
...caving in to everything Republicans demand.
It's not settled yet I know but they've been holding up pretty damned good this time ... so far .
Why are we accepting this "compromise"? Which will be anything but.
I 'm hoping Obama ends up getting a clean one page bill .
"Compromise" and "Capitulation", mixed up.
"Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing." -- Robert E. Howard
The media is already reporting that the final deal consists of:
1) raising the debt ceiling
2) trillions in spending cuts up front
3) across-the-board cuts if promises for further cuts aren't met
4) no tax increases of any sort
Republicans clearly wanted all 4 of those things. I don't see a single item there that was exclusively desired by the Democrats.
or selling out for their own taste of the sweet life? The only thing more repulsive than a Republican is a Democrat that acts like a Republican. That said, I still believe the the Democratic Party represents our country's best chance at being a free and prosperous society, I just wish the Democrats currently in office believed it.
They drove the Rolls Royce off the lot but don't want to pay for it .
That's pretty much a historical fact Captain .
I know you just cooked up this mess to find out exactly how
Long you could keep us stuck in it
...that C&L didn't provide the first chart in a mode capable of being copied and shared (Control C and Control V doesn'e work)...or provide an e-mail function within that post...NOW if someone knows how to do that let me know...THANKS, ahead of time...
Where IS Robin Hood when we need him?
Try
right click > copy image>got to where you want to paste and > right click >paste
you can save with Pixl Grabber or Screen Grab, both available add-ons. Or use the Captain's suggestion above; saves automatically as a .png that can be converted to .jpg if needed.
"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."
---Southwest Airlines
.
As I keep saying, "It's Bush's economy. I sure wish that the White House would try harder to keep people informed about this.
It's Clinton's fault , Clinton's recklessness didn't catch up with us until Bush took office , Bush was screwed , he tried to clean it up but along came Barnie Frank and Fannie Mae , then of course this Obama disaster !
Sure it is , the Republican's have very short and selective memories , of course for most of the Republican's supporters this is just way over their heads , period .
...I figured it out myself...just C/V the url and send to my e-mail list (of those who care enough to do something, perhaps)...YEAH!!!
For years we liberals have been labeled as "tax and spend". At least we liberals pay our bills, unlike the "borrow and spend" conservatives who then declare "bankruptcy" (i.e. Donald Trump, etc) when the bills come due.
Election 2012: Be Educated! Be Active! Vote!
www.phoenixjustice.com
Does anyone doubt for one second that if a Republican were president, the debt limit would have been raised as a matter of course?
No one with even an ounce of sense .
John Boehner, Mitch McConnell and Eric Cantor all voted seven times under G.W. Bush to raise the debt ceiling.
These republicans are shameless hacks who do not care about the welfare of this country or its people.
Does anyone doubt for one second that if a
Republicanwhite man were president, the debt limit would have been raised as a matter of course?FIFY.
"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."
---Southwest Airlines
With Democrats in control of the WH and/or Congress, Republicans will use routine legislation like raising the debt limit in order to extort the Democrats into making all sorts of concessions. That won't happen with Republicans in control of things, as the Democrats won't be able to pass their own legislation, and they will therefore put up more resistance to the GOP.
For the last 20 years, Democratic talking heads have continually preached *pragmatic politics.* Well, from the perspective of a progressive, the *pragmatic* thing to do is vote for Republicans, as recent history shows that Republicans obtain bigger victories when Democrats are in control of the WH and Congress. For example, if Clinton hadn't been President, DADT, DOMA, NAFTA and the repeal of Glass-Steagall would likely never have happened. Likewise, if Obama hadn't been elected, the extension of the Bush tax cuts and the forthcoming cuts to Medicare and SS would likely never have happened. Since it's clear the Democrats are never going to fight for progressive legislation, all progressives can do is try and minimize the damage done by conservatives, and again, recent history shows that the way to do that is to put Republicans in charge of government.
Bingo. That's why all the hand-wringing about not voting for Obama is starting to sound very hollow.
Sorry, but eight years of wrong-headed policy under Bush argue against you.
Imagine four (or eight) years of a majority Tea Party House and Senate. Seriously - think about it.
Add in President Bachmann in the WH. Or, if you're lucky, a relative "moderate" like President Romney, who would only somewhat mitigate mass defunding of entitlements, further tax cuts and sellouts to the privileged, and paranoid, patriotic nuttery as a method of government.
The Republicans and their Teabagger buddies are doing their best to drive the economy further into the ditch, thinking that it will help them in the 2012 elections. Economists indicate that the result of these draconian cuts will be an increase in unemployment and a reduction of the GDP; the opposite of what the public wants. The Republicans must think that the general public is pretty stupid, because the public will remember who is working to cut their Social Security and Medicare benefits while protecting the fat cats, war mongers and corporate oligarchs. Taking hostages is called kidnapping and will be severely punished. A pig with lipstick in the 2012 elections will still be recognized as a pig. Good luck in the 2012 elections "Repigs".
I think I'll forward these graphs to my Republican relatives , piss them off on this fine Sunday afternoon .
all these gop/teabagger hypocrites should experience what
was done to traitors and terriorists in the beginning of this govt.
up against the wall, blindfolded and finality........
the gop/teabaggers are 95% the cause of our national debt, but
they want history to only begin for the debt when obama took
office. if 2nd amendment solutions as sharon angle has suggested
were a cure for all our ills then the gop/teabaggers should be the
first recipients of this gop/teabagger solution. but we are a
"civilized nation", but only just. we are slipping into
the madness of oligarchy rule and fastly becoming less than
a third world culture.
the gop/teabaggers only vomit biblical platitudes, but shit on
everything that smacks of morality. the sooner they subcome
to their own "death of a thousand cuts" the better.......
Because the conservatives/tp/gop are still getting what they want. They run up debit, and we all pay for it. Because the DEMO-CATS HAVE NO BALLS to stand up for us. So they lose ever time they get into some kind of negotiation, they have no bargaining skills at all. So once again the GOP wins. Obama is the best president they could have.
Comments are closed on this entry