Go Home

BBC:

A panel probing fraud claims in the Afghan election has found Hamid Karzai did not gain enough valid votes for an outright win, the BBC understands.

Preliminary results from August's first round had placed Mr Karzai comfortably over the 50% plus one vote threshold needed to avoid a run-off.

But the BBC understands Mr Karzai's vote share has fallen below half, after a number of votes were ruled invalid.

Under poll rules, Mr Karzai now faces a runoff against rival Abdullah Abdullah.

The panel said it had found "clear and convincing evidence of fraud" at the polling stations, which were across the country.

It was not clear how Mr Karzai would respond to the ECC findings, amid reports of a possible legal challenge.

Initial results released last month had given him nearly 55% of votes, with former foreign minister Mr Abdullah on 28%.

The Afghan president has insisted he won the election outright, but EU observers have said as many as one in four votes cast were suspicious.

Sources have told the BBC that Mr Karzai is furious over the prospect of a second round.

It makes Rahm Emanuel's comment that we must know if we have a partner in Afghanistan before making a decision on troop escalation that much more pointed and the Republicans pressuring Pres. Obama to make a quicker decision regarding Afghanistan that much more ridiculous and reactionary.

About Nicole Belle
Nicole Belle's picture
Mom, Wife, Media Critic/Political Analyst, Blogger, Austen Fanatic, Unapologetic Liberal NicoleBelle@crooksandliars.com
Share This Post

Link To This Post


9 Comments

If the UN can overturn an election in Afghanistan then the third world dictators there can take away our right to sell guns all around the world.

Except, why would third world dictators want another election?


"I mean Romney is the most conservative on illegal immigration and I don't think Ronald Reagan could get elected in California today."
Ann "Clipped" Coulter

crcombine's picture

...with the following statement:
"It makes...Republicans pressuring Pres. Obama to make a quicker decision regarding Afghanistan that much more ridiculous and reactionary."

I don't think that it is possible for Republicans to be more ridiculous and reactionary than they already are. Your point, however, is well taken--Republican "decision making" on so many fronts is largely responsible for the mess we're in today.


"Buy the ticket, take the ride."
Hunter S. Thompson

rockybelt's picture

Why should one more American die in Afghanistan?

ricky's picture

After all, they could be dying in Nicaragua if Wilson had been given his first choice.


"I mean Romney is the most conservative on illegal immigration and I don't think Ronald Reagan could get elected in California today."
Ann "Clipped" Coulter

What's the point of being in Afghanistan again?

Different Anonymous's picture
.

Just spreading the joys of "democracy" and The Holy Love of Jesus(tm).

If you really want to see the sheer futility of it all check out the first 15 minutes of the PBS show "Obama's War" (that's all I could take anyway). Apparently our great new strategy that we need all the troops for is to have 19 year olds from Kansas barking "Hello" and "How's it going" in english to illiterate goat herders then getting a reaction to similar to what you'd get if the Afghan army came to Kansas and started talking to the Jayhawks in Pashtun.

Brilliant. Just brilliant. Definitely a policy that's worth 20,000 more troops and untold more deaths. It's well past time we stopped listening to the generals.

moonsha's picture

It sounds too easy to say it is for energy resources, but haven't most of our conflicts after the cold war involved regions that are rich in oil or strategic geographic locations?

Yes, American military hegemony covers 90% of the globe resources in terms of natural gas and oil resources.

Look at the Trans-Afghan Pipeline project which must go through Afghanistan AND Pakistan. Pakistan wants to control half of the flow of oil to India. Either way you look at the military presence in Afghanistan, there will HAVE to be deal between Pakistan, the Taliban, and the United States.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6afjdjjG1mI&fe...

Embittered Angry Anti-Republicrat Max-Hussein-1's picture
.

.

Dear George W. Bush,
How do you like them apples?

.


Starve the WAR Beast...
... Feed Americans.

VietVet67's picture

After 9 years of being there and not accomplishing a damn thing, why are you concerned all of a sudden?

Comments are closed on this entry