McCain’s Macaca Moment
By nonny mouse Monday Oct 06, 2008 4:00pm
In March of 2000, Katie Hong, a Korean-American woman who worked for the Washington state government, wrote an article for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer about Senator John McCain’s remark to reporters on his campaign bus.
He said, “I hated the gooks. I will hate them as long as I live.”
Although he attempted to explain he was referring specifically to his Vietnamese prison guards while he was a POW – his habitual justification for just about everything he does or says – he refused to apologize for his use of a racially offensive epithet generally regarded as applicable to anyone of Asian background. Ms. Hong was not only hurt by his comment, having committed to serving her country as a place where equal opportunity and justice for everyone regardless of their skin color could become reality, she was disturbed by how little reaction his remark generated from the media.
It is eight years later, and McCain’s second run at the White House. In that time, he’s dropped numerous F-bombs, called his wife the C-word, and used racially charged language in his campaign to refer to his opponent. There is no reason to believe that his attitude toward “gooks” has changed all that much, either. McCain’s unmanageable irritability and use of inappropriate and offensive language has generated serious questions “whether he has the temperament, and the political approach and skills, we want in the next president of the United States.”
But a deeper and far more troubling uncertainty concerns me. This particular McCain Macaca Moment is not excusable just because he was a POW, and it’s disconcerting that McCain himself is incapable of seeing it, saying, “Do I insult anybody or fly off the handle or anything like that? No, I don’t.” But far more importantly, this is indicative of a dangerous and intransigent racism that not only offends a large percentage of American citizens – and not all of them need be Asian to be offended – it has no place in a presidency that may well be called upon to negotiate with the aforementioned “gooks”, some of whom have nuclear weapons and others who own a good deal of our national debt. To “hate the gooks” is bad enough, but to declare “I will hate them as long as I live” demonstrates a pig-headed obstinacy that is antithetical to anyone aspiring to hold the most influential and powerful office in the country, if not the world.
But just how many more McCain Macaca Moments is it going to take?
Login or Register to post comments.
Oh yeah Macca Macca Macca
Have you seen McCain's new ad? It's just horrible!!! He really needs to be stopped!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCxlAc9erlE
This psycho is still living Vietnam. Perhaps we shouldn't blame him for that, given what he went through. But do we REALLY WANT a psychologically unbalanced, C student at the helm again (with an end-of-times religious nutcase in the wings)?
If he hates the Vietnamese as much as he says, then why was he "pallin around" with this terrorist - a former leader of the Viet Cong who ordered the executions of three of McCain's comrades?
As if I needed any McCain Macaca Moments in particular.
This is Regal. Here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3b8d7EBrxE
Macaca is what the Knack now sing whilst employed cleaning public toilets.
)O(
I know several Viet Nam veterans who feel the same. I did not experience what they went through over there, but the sentiment is ubiquitous. Some Vets have a very real loathing for anyone oriental, on a personal level I do not understand it, but some have no problem expressing those feelings.
If you want to attack McCain there are many opportunities, but this is a dead end.
It's a serious error I think to attack McCain about a hatred of "gooks". Anyone who spends years in captivity, being abused, is going to have some long term problems, understandably hating his captors and their people. While it's not acceptable for a President to openly say he "hates gooks", those who point that out simply open themselves to being seen as lacking compassion and understanding. Best to leave this one alone.
"those who point that out simply open themselves to being seen as lacking compassion and understanding."
Lol what bullshit. Am I on C&L or some wacko right wing site?
What is BS is that anyone who has a different opinion than your own is automatically lambasted as 'some wacko right wing'er. That is the same crap that the Dittoheads use. Its not constructive - and narrow minded.
I think there is merit in what 'edgecity' says. The man spent 5 years being abused by his captors. He says that he hates 'gooks' and then says that term refers to his captors. Where is the traction for any story that will bring in undecided voters - which is really what we need here. Yes, McCain is at least very likely racist against Vietnamese people. It is arguable whether that is justifiable or not. Yes, he should not have said that. Yes, he would make a sucky president and this is another example of his lack of decorum and tact. However, none of this will convince the undecided voter (largely the uninformed and uninterested) who will like say "well, of course he hates his captors and calls them nasty things - I would too". And they would further exclaim "damn, limp wristed lefties at it again" - quite helpful indeed.
No it's not.
Try living in a hole for five years enduring constant torture. You wouldn't hate the people that did it and everyone that was similar to them?
Regardless, its still my argument that this line of argument will not win over the undecided. We are winning, we don't need to dig through the mud to find the penny. At least not when there is a dollar sitting on the surface (the economy).
is not enough to excuse his repetition of racist comments. Any serious candidate for President should have the common sense and self-control not to use racist epithets, especially while campaigning. Regardless of how you feel about his racist comments and regardless of whether they can be explained by his years as a POW (an explanation that is getting damn tired for all the many uses Senator McCain puts it to), referring to "gooks" is just more evidence of a fundamental lack of judgment and self-control.
Calling your wife a "****", referring to Asians as "gooks", trying to equate Obama with "terrorists", telling jokes about a woman appreciating being raped - these are all evidence that Senator McCain lacks the qualities necessary to be a decent President. (In GOP terms, he lacks the "character" to be President.)
While I agree with you, I still don't think that making this particular thing a "gotcha" moment is going to help win the election. It will do nothing to convince the undecided - and I think would do the exact opposite; make them think that BO mudslings with the best of them and is just another typical politician. While I am fine with calling him out on things that will likely influence undecided voters, this will hurt more than it will help.
Again, I think that you are correct and I would advocate a similar position. However, find your nearest undecided friend and tell them this story. Then ask them how that changes their opinion of JM. I would bet that it won't make one bit of difference.
Unfortunately, politics isn't just about who is right - we have learned that in the last two elections.
******s, ****s, chinks, crackers, or any other slur for an an ethnic group shouldn't be president
It is those " long term problems " that make him unfit to be President.
Seconded!
the man is unfit mentally, physically, and most definitely morally! He's a sleazy ba$tard who I wouldn't buy a used car from... how the hell there are still voters out there who think he's the man is beyond my comprehension. I seriously don't get it...
Someone who spends years in captivity, being abused, may well have long term problems, and hate his captors and by extension their people, and anyone who looks like them as well. But I suggest you read 'The Sunflower; On the Possibilities and Limits of Forgiveness', by Simon Wiesenthal, who was not a soldier, didn't volunteer to risk his life and freedom for his country, but was Jew imprisoned in a Nazi concentration camp where he endured and witnessed more horror than I suspect did Mr. McCain. One of the people who wrote a piece for his book was the man I'm doing my doctorate on, Albert Speer, Hitler's Minister of Armaments who was responsible for the deaths of thousands of slave labourers in Nazi camps. Wiesenthal forgave Speer, as did Rabbi Aba Geis, who became one of Speer's closest friends. Regardless of what you or I or anyone else thinks of Speer, it was Wiesenthal's and Geis's right to forgive or not forgive - they earned it, we didn't.
That they did speak volumes of the heroic capacity for human compassion, understanding and even forgiveness of the worst crimes imaginable, something that it seems Mr. McCain is fundamentally incapable of. I don't deny McCain's right not to forgive. I do not however, want someone who is so completely locked into his own past and his own pain to speak on my behalf to the people he - rightly or wrongly - views as responsible for that past and that pain. He quite clearly does not have the depth of character enough to be President.
Viktor Frankl's 1946 book Man's Search for Meaning is another great book that demonstrates that some of us are able to remain compassionate and human in the most dire of circumstances.
Clearly, John McCain isn't one of those people. I once saw a video of him visiting Viet Nam many years after the war, meeting his captors. He had a horribly forced smile and patted one of the Vietnamese on his back so hard it about knocked him over. He looked seething with unacknowledged rage.
Still, I don't trust attacking McCain about this is useful. In my experience, offering empathy rather than attacking will expose more "truth". I'd love to see an interview of him getting acknowledgement for the pain and rage he carries. He'd come apart at the seams and the election would be over.
Actually, Speer was not actually directly involved in the Holocaust. For the rest of his life, he denied having had knowledge of it. He was sentenced at the Nuremberg trials not for involvement in the Holocaust but for having contributed to prolonging the war.
When Gitta Sereny researched her book on him, though, she found evidence that Speer had attended a meeting at which the Holocaust had been discussed. Evidence which was unknown to the Nuremberg prosecution. If they had known, and proved he knew of it, he'd have been executed.
Perhaps Obama will anger McCain and McCain will suddenly turn into Randall Flagg on National TV for us.
Can't we????
Randall Flagg-- the original neo-con!
I thought that Senator McCain is a Christian. Such comments would not be very indicative of any Christian teaching I know.
Especially this one: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.
You know a tree by its fruit.
Than San Francisco must be very devout. Not only are they named after a saint; they're known for being fruity.
)O(
no kidding.
my gay friends act more christian than the war-mongering nutter-butters who've hijacked my faith.
It's strange, but there seems to be no stopping religious hypocrisy.
You'd think the Bible made it clear enough with the stories about the Pharisees. At least it seemed pretty clear to me as a kid in Sunday school.
Fundamentalism <-> Self-righteousness <-> Hypocrisy
I've found an even stronger example more recently in Islam. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that Mohammad must've really hated hypocrites. The Qu'ran denounces religious hypocrisy again and again and again. It denounces people who are religious in words but not in deed. It's basically one of the worst sins a muslim can commit. - Yet Islam is even more plagued today by self-righteous fundamentalist hypocrites than Christianity even.
Well.. at least it goes to show that religion itself isn't to blame.
"I thought that Senator McCain is a Christian. Such comments would not be very indicative of any Christian teaching I know."
His deeds are even worse than his words. The man couldn't keep his viagra-addled member in his pants to save his life.
I think that's the point. Mr. McCain's words say he is a Christian. His deeds, not so much.
In the Tuesday debate Obama has the best opportunity ever to goad the old man into blowing his top. Politely but firmly go after his lack of honor. Repeat to him his words about sleeze campaigning from 2000, and then remind him that the same people are now leading his campaign advertising. Remind McCain that honor isn't something like a garment that you can take from the shelf and wear it when it's convenient, then put it back when it's not. You either have it with you at all times, or you don't have it at all. That should do it.
And he can use McCains own words from his current campaign where he promised to run an honorable and respectful campaign and where he frowned upon going all negative which is precisely what hes doing now.
Nothing McCain hates more than someone questioning his honor.
Unfortunately, McCain's racism is embraced by a substantial number of white American voters, for whom Latinos will always be "Beaners" or "Wet Backs", Asians always "Gooks" or "Slopes", Blacks always "Coons" or "N*gg*ers", and so forth. It's also endemic in the circles within which McCain has traveled his entire life and no doubt what he grew up with. The Navy in which his father and grandfather served was a racist Navy, and the Annapolis they attended a racist school.
My problem with McCain is not that the leopard can't change his spots, but that he is seemingly incapable of grasping why his North Vietnamese captors might not have seen him as the "hero" he imagines himself to be. To this day he cannot conceive of the death and destruction he wrought on innocent civilians.
That is what is truly scary.
I think he is lying. The epithet that the members of the US Air Force applied, specifically to the people of Viet Nam, was slopehead.
I remember. So do many others.
Yes, this would be a problem, were it not for the fact that the people who blindly support him share this, and many similar, sentiments.
Red meat.
Frankly, I believe that McCain's racist attitudes would be far more tolerable post-torture were he not running for President. I've known a few old folks who, after enduring mentally- and physically-scarring experiences beyond what most of us could even imagine, are a little touchy around certain topics or groups. Even if we don't condone it, we sort of look past it because it's just one of those things. But again, John McCain is running for President of the United States and I think that, unfortunately, this sort of thing won't do.
As a Vietnam veteran, allow me to state that the reason why the"gooks", as McCain so crudely put it, were trying to [justifiably] kill him after his plane landed in the lake in Hanoi was because he was trying to drop bombs on them. Undoubtedly many Vietnamese will continue to hate McCain because of the fact that he took part in Operation "Rolling Thunder", when he dropped high explosives on the towns and people below during short flights from an American aircraft carrier that was stationed in the South China Sea, a mission which McCain had volunteered and which was designed to use sustained bombing to destroy the country's economy and infrastructure and kill or maim large numbers of its citizens.
It should not be forgotten that U.S. warplanes dropped close to eight million tons of explosives on a country roughly the size of New Mexico which ended up destroying Vietnam's cities and laid waste to its industrial, transportation and communications infrastructure. After the carnage was over, close to five million Vietnamese were killed, many of them victims of U.S. aerial bombardments. Think of those people who were unjustifiably killed next time you hear Barack Obama praise John McCain for his military service.
Other of McCain's fellow Republicans would simply replace the word "gook" with "n*gger" or "faggot".
It also should be stated that what McCain conveniently never mentions, either in public or in his autobiography, is that a Vietnamese peasant pulled McCain from the lake after his plane had been shot down and had then shielded McCain from a mob of about 40 people who were attempting to [justifiably] kill him because he had tried to drop his bombs on them. It would seem to be way past the point for McCain to acknowledge that a "gook" that he hates so much is someone who saved his life those many years ago.
An infinite amount, chastizing him for racism is just going to get the "for FIVE AND A HALF YEARS McCain did not have freedom of speech!!!" or remarks about how "nobody can say anything inappropriate without POLITICAL CORRECTNESS getting in the way (GOD DAMN LIB'RULS)" and both would draw cheers.
They don't seem to lose a thing by appealing to the lowest of the low.
mccorpse found out the hard way that the vietnamese throw war criminals in prison. he bombed civilian targets, got caught, and was sent to prison.
I'd say, if anything, his POW experience makes it worse (even as it makes it more understandable) since it makes me think that it's a deep-seated prejudice tied to deep trauma that he'll probably never get past. In other words, while George Allen sounded more like a xenophobic idiot, McCain seems like he may really have problems with Asian people.
If I am not mistaken, the term "gook" derives from the Korean War. I read that it comes from the Korean word hanguk.
The husband of one of my mom's friends is a Korean war veteran, and he uses the term in conversation sometimes. I would wince when I heard him say it.
I am a Korean War Vet and I can say that the term was used a lot. I couldn't understand why any of us there would use that word about people we were there to help. I never did use that word.
(Korean to follow) 한 국, 미 국, 영 국, 위 국, These all end in "gook". They are Korean, American, English, and foreigner, respectively, so they would have heard the word "gook" a lot in Korea. I'm not surprised it got morphed into a slur. It's definitely from Korea. (I live here, you hear "gook" all the time.)
McCain is bad news. That much is sure. But to throw every nasty thing he's ever done/said at him is just wrong. The political debate will become coarsened, and the electorate will be turned off.
Whoever wins will face a difficult road, and we should just try to argue issues and relevant counterpoints to McCain on his ethical violations while a United States Senator.
McCain returned to this country after Vietnam a true hero, and he has used his status as a POW to cover his flaws. But as the left or as Democrats, we can decide which flaws to point out to the U.S electorate.
I agree. Besides, I think that Obama can skillfully dance around McCain to the point McCain's temper will fly. The guy has a real anger management issue. Obama just needs to give him enough rope to hang himself.
There's even a book written about it:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6iqLcidbhg
The author makes a very valid point towards the end of the video how McCain's career would have been long over had he used the N word instead. This world has a long way to go yet.
It's amazing how this man's mind works. Here he was bombing and killing innocent men, women and children, yet HE hates them because they let him live. He's very lucky they didn't take his arms off altogether. He should be thankful if anything.
Mainly, he should still be thanking his father for that - keeping him from getting killed after capture.
The fact that he has used a racial slur in reference to his captors is concerning >>>>> The fact that he still seems so eager and willing to do that again is whats' frightening to me.
"Bomb-bomb-bomb, bobm-bomb IRAN!
I started wondering if McBane was racist after the first debate when he wouldn't look at Obama and kept saying Obama "didn't understand." He seems to be treating Obama as his inferior, as a "boy." Plus, he voted against establishing MLK, Jr. day holiday numerous times. More evidence is pointing in that racist direction.
Not to mention the Confederate Flag he loves so much.
Maybe we're talking "Manchurian Candidate" with all of that brainwashing coming undone?
I always thought it strange how we buddied-up so fast to the Germans after WWII, as compared with the Japanese, Vietnamese, Koreans, and now the Iraqis. Americans have such a hard time with people who don't look like us.
Native American Indians anyone? Our roots in European genocide run deep.
If we give our veterans a pass on being racist against whoever they fought against, eventually we'll hate everybody, given how many more wars the neocons want to fight.
so, john's a trigger-happy, genocidal racist with a nervous tick. big deal.
i'm sure he will leave all that at the doorstep as he takes command of the good ship U.S.A...
Sweet tap-dancing Jesus, let Obama bring up the Keating Five at the debate, and let that scum-sucking despicable whore McCain drop the N-bomb. Oh sweet baby Jayzuz make it so!
this is fair game. this attitude disqualifies him to be president. it's scary to have someone with this mindset be in possession of the nuclear codes.
I've hated cooks all my life...You guys are just intolerant...
McCain has a bad temper and he's a racist. I hope Obama winds him up, stands back and let's him go. I'd really like McCain to show his true temperament in tomorrow night's debate. The guy really is a cretan.
McSames irrational temper and explosive episodes really makes me think that he is suffering from his own PTSD and refuses to confront and deal with it. He displays bipolar temperament swings and is irrational about insignificant issues and lives in denial of having personality disorders. He is not a good leader, he does not care for the veterans(check his voting records), and he is in the pockets of corporate fat cats(Keating Five). He is a compulsive liar and has fantasies of grander.
He is not fit to command the nation in war or peace time activities and is truly a danger to himself and thus to all of us.
STOP the Repukes!
VOTE for Peace!
Act as if you life counts on your vote! It just might if the Repukes take over?
Yes and he could prove to us he got treatment for his totally understandable PTSD if he would just release his medical records!
I'm sorry, I know that subject line is strange, but c-mon!!! once your a POW you can do what ever you want...I wanna steal $700 billion from the American tax payers, it's cool, because I'm a POW!
I wanna be a racist/sexist pig - to the point where you are willing to call my wife a **** in public, no problem, because I'm a POW!!
I wanna screw up my country with screwed up right wing idologies and then come out and say how I was the lone maverick who stood against the things I voted for, well, give me a break, I was a POW!!!
pretty much whatever you can think of, murder, rape, robbery...Any crime you can think of, go ahead...you can always say you were a POW!
I doubt this would affect many votes. I'm ashamed to say, my father uses racial slurs all the time, matter-of-factly, so did my grandparents, as did tons of white people from days past. They see them as descriptive, not offensive. That's the problem.
People like us prove that it's not a matter of upbringing and that anyone afflicted with the racism virus can still choose to correct that aspect of their personalities at any time.
Btw, I suspect that most people must know damn well that they are bothering people when they do that (like my old man), but they just don't care enough to grow anymore in their old age.
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/m...
what? are you certain this isnt some made up story planted to make the white american male look evil?
just kidding. this is his generation folks. I once went on vacation to hawaii, pearl harbor was a stop on the visit. Back at the office i was telling co-workers about my visit, i made the mistake of mentioning that "pearl harbor doesnt really mean much to me" (from a generational perspective)
The cranky old white guys in the office reacted so fiercely you would have thought I bombed pearl harbor.
What did I learn?
Old white american guys get to harbor grudges.... forever.
but old black american guys are "playing the victim" if they seem a bit ticked off at they way they were treated and continue to be treated. Oh well, I guess it's all right if you're all white.
Thank you for helping to bring some attention to this. If McCain had been caught using the N-word publicly (and, at this point, it doesn't seem to be entirely out of the question) he'd be finished (Sadly, he'd probably still win my home state). I don't understand why using a term that is derogatory to Asian-Americans should be more socially acceptable than using offensive terms to describe any other group of people.
It isn't.
...and his running mate is a vulgar woman.
I think that they are perfect and logical candidates for following up on and adding to all of the messes which BushCo has dropped all over the world.
often we project our self hate on to the world to protect our own ego.
I think you're right.
Loving one's self first is the key, even if you know deep down in your little black heart that you are truly a scumbag, like I do. ;-)
Why haven't the MSM or the Dems hammered McCain for this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ITToVCGgvEk
Why hasn't C&L made more of a stink about this?
Paraphrasing potential first dude, Todd Palin--
That was awesome.
It's what you call solidifying his base.
You should read the book Gook: John McCain's Racism and Why It Matters. Definitely evaluates this whole issue in depth.
Don't forget John McCain's response when one of the GOP's lovely supporters asked him "How do we beat the bitch?" when Hillary Clinton was the presumed Democratic presidential candidate. McCain giggled, guffawed, wiped his face a la Johnny Carson and responded "That's an excellent question."
No rebuke for calling his opponent a bitch. No attempt to show a little class and admonish his supporter. He could have said something as simple as "I wouldn't use that word to refer to my opponent." He could have been classy and said "I don't approve of that kind of namecalling; I don't think it is appropriate in a presidential race. Let's not do that."
But he didn't. He laughed and left that word hanging out there like a little cloud of noxious gas, giving his tacit approval.
And he and his campaign have the nerve to say Sarah Palin is the victim of sexism? And that the media is too tough on her? Poor baby. Can you imagine Obama laughing and showing his approval by giving an 'excellent question' rating to a supporter who might call Palin a bitch?
Here's the link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8XBlxvA7AA
Couldn't have said any of this better myself.
someone should call grampy mcshitstain a old decrepit senile incontinent crooked insane psychopath and see how he likes it
I can't help but think of McCain in a rainy Memphis back in April, repeatedly apologizing to the crowd on the anniversiary of Dr. King's assassination for voting against the MLK holiday... while a black man held an umbrella over McCain's head. One of McCain's excuses for his voting record on the MLK holiday issue is that he was busy with the Vietnam war at the time and didn't know a lot about King's work. So, McCain came home in 1973, but it took him almost 20 years to learn of King's work. My question would be: "Okay, fine, you didn't know much about King when the holiday issue first came up. So, if you didn't know much about King, why did you vote against the legislation and not just abstain, since you didn't, according to yourself, know much about the man? Do you often vote on issues not knowing the facts? Or why didn't you take the time to learn about a man the huge majority of the US wanted to honor? Shouldn't that peak your curiosity? "Who is this King guy I keep hearing about?" Of course, McCain's excuse (he's given others like "it would have cost too much money") is such a lie - that he knew little about MLK in 1983...please. This along with McCain's "gook" comment is a very revealing insight to the character of a man that wants to be president.
Irwin Tang actually wrote a book about McCain and his racial slurs and their connections to war. One of the most damming things he covered was McCain actually gave money to the Contra's and visited one of their camps after the Contras had not only tortured and killed countless innocents but had even killed a peaceful American Engineer. You can learn more at this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E-y_5DFb6U
Why aren't we hearing more about the Contra connection? This is backed up by major news papers of the time and the congressional record.
The US military are experts in dehumanizing the enemy and desensitizing the troops. In warfare to desensitize the troops in the killing and slaughter that occurs during battles the forces deliberately label the enemy as "Gooks" "Ragheads" or what have you.
This is a known military tactic to aid your own forces in coping with the carnage of combat. An angry soldier is an asset, a grieving soldier a danger to himself and his team.
However, it is a failure of the military and our society to not counter this technique when the forces are released back into civilian life. In time and with maturity most people loose the slang and hatred associated with the terminology.
For true combat veterans it is extremely difficult because it becomes a coping, or be it, survival mechanism for dealing with their individual history of combat. Many, and I mean many, veterans can never turn off the hate switch for their enemy. "A Gook is a Gook!" I am not saying it is right, but I am trying to explain so that civilians at least have a reference of the hatred associated with the slang. If you buddies brains are laying in your lap from an AK round that blew his head open you are going to kill the Gook that fired that round!
McSames own words reveal that he has not dealt effectively with his own war experience and is not fit to be President.
Just a Vietnam veteran here trying to explain a complex situation to civilians.
I am no fan of McCain but because he said a few bad words this makes him unqualified?
This is like the petty crap the republicans foucus on.
There are better reason that McCain should not be president, lets not waste our time bring up stuff like this.
What if he had said "******," "****," or "spic" instead of "gook?" It is not that those are just bad words - the context and intent of the person using those words is what matters, and I think it matters quite a bit, especially if there is a history. If I walked into a store and heard the owner using those words, I would leave. So I certainly wouldn't vote for that person for any office, much less POTUS - but that's just me.
My father was also a POW, WWII 2 1/2 years and a flyer, too. He knew viscerally, from TV and press reporting of the 2000 primary campaign and the Keating Scandal years before, that McCain was not the kind of POW who met their psychological demons during imprisonment and after repatriation and overcame...who worked to become a better more human person. He said McCain was dangerous, fed his pain and carried anger fearlessly, with no consideration of any one else. McCain has had an empty, unfulfilled life and he has played it out carelessly as a charlatan in the public arena.
McInsane hates everybody.
Do not forget his rape joke as well. He is not mentally fit to be president.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/15/sour...
GOP = NSDAP
You wanna see a McCain Macaca moment, you need, NEED to check this out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWSRBQQCfUI
Man, the gooks remark is nothing compared to last night's "that one."
Login or Register to post comments.