Senate Republicans Even Obstructing Judicial Nominees They Helped Pick
The Senate Republicans are like willful children: "You can't make me!" They obstruct, for obstruction's sake and here's a perfect example from Right Wing Watch:
If you need any more proof that Senate Republicans' sole mission at the moment is to prevent anything from happening in their chamber of Congress, look no further than the fact that today the Senate had to seek cloture on the nomination Barbara Milano Keenan to fill a vacancy on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, resulting in a vote of 99-0.
That's right - not one Republican senator spoke against her qualifications, record, or views or voted to prevent her nomination from receiving an up-or-down vote on the Senate floor ... and yet still they filibustered, forcing Democrats to seek a cloture vote in order to move ahead, simply because they are committed to obstructing the governing process in every way possible.
Earlier today, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy took to the Senate floor to blast the Republicans' refusal to allow the Senate to move on even noncontroversial judicial nominations:
Last year’s total was the fewest judicial nominees confirmed in the first year of a Presidency in more than 50 years. Those 12 Federal circuit and district court confirmations were even below the 17 the Senate Republican majority allowed to be confirmed in the 1996 session. After that presidential election year, Chief Justice Rehnquist began criticizing the pace of judicial confirmations and the partisan Republican tactics.
Among the frustrations is that Senate Republicans have delayed and obstructed nominees chosen after consultation with Republican home state Senators. Despite President Obama’s efforts, Senate Republicans have treated his nominees much, much worse.
I noted when the Senate considered the nominations of Judge Christina Reiss of Vermont and Mr. Abdul Kallon of Alabama relatively promptly that they should serve as the model for Senate action. Sadly, they are the exception rather than the model. They show what the Senate could do, but does not. Time and again, noncontroversial nominees are delayed. When the Senate does finally consider them, they are confirmed overwhelmingly. Of the 15 Federal circuit and district court judges confirmed, twelve have been confirmed unanimously.
That is right. Republicans have only voted against three of President Obama's nominees to the Federal circuit and district courts. One of those, Judge Gerry Lynch of the Second Circuit, garnered only three negative votes and 94 votes in favor. Judge Andre Davis of Maryland was stalled for months and then confirmed with 72 votes in favor and only 16 against. Judge David Hamilton was filibustered in a failed effort to prevent an up-or-down vote.
The obstruction and delay is part of a partisan pattern. Even when they cannot say “no,” Republicans nonetheless demand that the Senate go slow. The practice is continuing. This is the 17th filibuster of President Obama's nominees. That does not count the many other nominees who were delayed or are being denied up-or-down votes by Senate Republicans refusing to agree to time agreements to consider even noncontroversial nominees.




Call me old fashioned Senator Leahy, but until you make them talk instead of forcing you to round up votes, it isn't a filibuster and it won't be covered as such.
"I mean Romney is the most conservative on illegal immigration and I don't think Ronald Reagan could get elected in California today."
Ann "Clipped" Coulter
More than sixty years as an unswerving, full blown, Democrat. I no longer want to be associated with this party. I started denying democrat affiliation months ago. And now I simply disavow everything they (legislators, and by proxy-me) stand for. They are cowards, criminals and nothing remotely representative of anything I stand for.
Whether they were right or wrong, I wanted them to use the arsenal the electorate bestowed on them. And when the republicans began pulling their juvenile crap-fests, I wanted the dems to strike hard and bloody. They tucked their tales and crawled away, relinquishing their formidable weaponry. They are pathetic and repulsive losers and I am not!!!
makes you sound like a loser. Look at the facts. The regressive party is 100% against every bill. There are a few bluedog democrats that side with them. Who are the ones that are the biggest problem? Answer: The republicans in case you aren't able to figure it out.
there is very little, if any, difference between them? None of them do the People's work.
I can see what the bigger problem is and it isn't the democrats.
My point, exactly. I don't have to belong to one of the 'two' parties in order to participate in the discourse.
I believe I could count on 10 fingers and 10 toes the number of Democrats that I would trust to be fully engaged in doing the People's business, instead of looking out for their own private for-profit business or that of their Corporatist masters. Obama is not one of them. He needs to get the boot in 2012.
Three changes that would radically improve, if not the quality at least the chance of improved quality, of our elected representatives: (1) return of the Fairness Doctrine to fix our broken MSM, (2) public financing of elections, and (3) term limits. Regarding the latter 2 changes, believe it or not, I have found some common ground with persons who might be considered (in these parts) as "Tea-Baggers" (but not BSC "Beck-ians").
AFAIK, that CNN poll that showed that 82% of respondents were anti-incumbent was fairly accurate. I think both the Republican and Democratic Parties are in trouble with their real (voting) bases -- Tea-Baggers on one side of the political divide, and Progressives on the other side. There is enough discontent IMHO for a viable 3rd and even 4th political party to compete in the next few election cycles. Hey, George Saros, are you paying attention?
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
-- John F. Kennedy
BUSH... MUST SAVE BUSH... MUST SAVE BUSH... MUST SAVE BUSH...
Okay, I'll accept that, but please explain to me (cuz I really don't know) how it is that a party with a "super-majority" in both houses (until recently, that is) and a president of the same party can be so ineffectual. If republicans can dredge up obscure parliamentary rules to obstruct so effectively, why can't dems counter, effectively? I'm sorry, it seems like a paradox, to me.
And another thing, since they seem to have decided to use reconciliation, why not scrap the watered down, republican orchestrated health care bill, and start over with EVERYTHING dems want? Why do dems have to ALWAYS be the "civil" lawmakers? I'm sick of it, whoever is at fault!
Puh-leeze, Reid hasn't had a super-majority yet. 58 Democrats and 2 Independents don't make a super-majority, especially with Lieberman and a handful of ConservaDems.
Reid would need to get to about 66 or 67 before he'd reach a real "super-majority" status. And knowing Reid, he'd still be begging Republicans to get things accomplished.
Why are these Anti AMERICAN scum sucking Racist, Nazis getting so much air time. It is my understanding that between these Nazis, Racist and the right wing DIP Shit media known as Entertainment that if it isn't White it isn't right.
So why don't the alledged real media back off and let these republiCANTS sink in their own filth.
Here is one you know how these Spineless Gutless COWARDS on the right have all these detectors in place start asking for the RACIST NAZI representative from the republiCANT We Hate America representative.
I just tired Rep nonsense
The Republican has shown itself to be the enemy of politics itself.
"Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob"
-= Franklin Delano Roosevelt =-
For me the most maddening thing about all this chit is, if the dems manage to squander their once in a lifetime opportunity and become the minority again, I will bet right now, they will NOT resort to similar tactics-- in the interest of "bi-partisanship! They just are not the 'scrappers' of 30 years ago. And I do not think this is going to change- ever,
Even the more blue-doggy of Dems are beginning to wake up and realize that they're going to be voted out by the combination of actual liberals and teabaggers come the next election. They're not going to be able to sell "conservative/moderate dem" to anyone who listens to glenn beck. There aren't any "good guys" anymore, Lieberman and the like are all teabagger targets.
Things aren't different, but they're slowly changing. The monsters these idiots created are taking over.
Can Republicans stoop any lower? I continue to be amazed each passing day with the shit these asswipes do and say. They will do absolutely anything to regain power.
You are not alone , you'd think I would get used to it by now but everyday I am outraged a new ... and amazed . Frustrating as can be that the Dems are so inept and dysfunctional , I'm sure these Repugs are laughing at em .
because senators representing a minority of the population can keep our government from functioning.
will remain in the governing bodies as long as people are either unaware or supportive of their behavior. Rather than burn the house down (which I do favor on some days), exposure should be the remedy.
But I have not said it today. Can anyone give me a present day rationale for the United States to contiune having a replica of the House of Lords which served no purpose other than to unite 13 distinct seperate colonial structures when the countyr was founded over two centuries ago? Make the argument why we need a Senate.
It weakens democracy in both its construct and its practice.
"I mean Romney is the most conservative on illegal immigration and I don't think Ronald Reagan could get elected in California today."
Ann "Clipped" Coulter
The senate should be abolished.
Rush Limbaugh is what a smart person thinks a stupid bigot sounds like.
it works at least the repubs have a set
they run congress no matter how many demos are there
follow the money then you will discover who the demos represent.
it is a demo con to look good
at least they will say they tried.
reform wont come until 2014
a sham pure sham
time to drain the swamp. all the swamp.
"Senate Republicans Even Obstructing Judicial Nominees They Helped Pick"
Maybe I'm wrong, but isn't this the kind of sanctimonious crap that happens when Democrats cave right and left and roll over on their backs with their paws in the air?
Now if only Obama had the intellect to grasp this point!
"Senate republican's filibuster bathroom breaks!"
Democrats pee their pants on Senate floor, while republcans hang out in bathrooms.
Rush Limbaugh is what a smart person thinks a stupid bigot sounds like.
BLOCK AND BLAME REPUBLICANS.
say it often, keep it simple and make it stick.
there is far more truth behind that label than there ever was behind the tax and spend liberal label we heard for so long.
This is Republicans using Shock and Awe against the United States and the spineless dims need to stop worring about Eyeran and Eyerack and start going to war against the RepoTaliban in this country and do it now.
I love your title "Crooks and Liars." It so fits.
I have a solution for all these political games. If you don't vote for a bill then your constituents will still pay taxes but don't get to benefit from that particular bill. Maybe that will force some honesty eventually. And then maybe the dopey voters that elect these obstructionist idealog politicians will finally learn something about government and the about the bums they elected. Actually the fault is not just with the parties but also mostly with the ignorant voters that just vote as their church or neighbors or union or newspaper tells them without knowing what is going on.
Comments are closed on this entry