Two More Former Walker Staffers Charged; One Makes Deal As Informant
Two staffers who worked directly for Gov. Scott Walker while he was county executive were charged Thursday with illegally doing extensive political work while being paid by taxpayers to do county jobs.
One of the two, Darlene Wink, cut a deal with prosecutors under which she agreed to provide information in a related investigation about the destruction of digital evidence and to aid in further prosecutions. This is the first indication that the multifaceted John Doe investigation may be pursuing charges of evidence tampering.
Milwaukee County prosecutors also made the surprising disclosure that top Walker aides set up a private Internet network to allow them to communicate with one another by email about campaign as well as county government work without the public or co-workers' knowledge.
The emails Walker officials traded via the shadow network could provide investigators with a trove of information as they pursue other angles in the case. Earlier this week, the Journal Sentinel reported that the probe was focusing on possible bid-rigging and other misconduct in the competition to house the county Department on Aging in private office space.
In a statement, Walker's campaign said he had a policy against county employees using government resources to do campaign work.
"Scott Walker expected everyone to follow the law and made that clear publicly and privately," the statement said.
There, you see? He had a "policy" against it, so I'm sure everything's going to be just fine for Scott!
On Thursday, prosecutors charged Kelly Rindfleisch, deputy chief of staff to Walker in 2010, with four felony counts of misconduct in office for working for then-Rep. Brett Davis' 2010 campaign for lieutenant governor while on the county clock. Davis, who lost in the Republican primary, is now Walker's state Medicaid director.
The complaint says that Rindfleisch told a friend in an Internet chat shortly after taking the job with Walker that "half of what I'm doing is policy for the campaign."
During work hours between February 2010 and early July 2010, it says, Rindfleisch sent more than 300 emails to Davis and 1,380 fundraising emails. The John Doe also turned up more than 1,000 emails between Rindfleisch and top staffers on Walker's 2010 campaign during work hours over the same period.

I wonder how Fox News will spin this story, especially if the dirt of corruption ends up all over Walker when his staff narcs on him. You know, it's just a big conspiracy by the liberal media to make Walker look bad.
If Walker ends up with dirt of the corruption on him, Fox News will do what they always do. Rewrite history to claim they never supported Walker and were always fair and balanced. I am wondering what the Vegas line is now on recall vs resignation.
right now.. but that could change rapidly if this investigation is on a fast track.
The plea bargain is the lead here. I doubt if the prosecutors would offer, and get, that deal unless she was looking at prison time AND she knows where a bunch more slime is buried.
Darlene Wink, cut a deal with prosecutors under which she agreed to provide information in a related investigation about the destruction of digital evidence and to aid in further prosecutions.
the plea bargain is the problem for the defendants. If the defendants don't know what she is telling them they will all lawyer up and take the 5th until trial time so they can see what they are up against during discovery. I don't know if the JohnDoe is in front of a GRAND jury. If it is, she has to tell EVERYTHING truthfully to stay out jail. ..."and to aid in further prosecutions." several more indictments?
That's like having a pair of Aces in the hole for the prosecution.
Wonder if Walkers' backers are nervous about losing $10 million in this poker game?
Can I teach evolution in the Sunday school at your tax-free Church? No?!
Can you use taxpayer money to impose your religious beliefs on others? NO!
Separation of church and state is a wall, not a one-way door.
Walker isn't man enough to resign.
He'll get booted and then whine like a little bitch.
Also, if he gets booted, does he get to keep his pension? Does he lose it if he resigns?
"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."
Wait, so why is setting up his own intranet bad? Did he do it on government systems with people being paid government salaries? Because otherwise, it doesn't seem particularly suprising or even important...
Because this "shadow" network was set up using government computers on government time for the express purpose of circumventing the law.
Election 2012: Be Educated! Be Active! Vote!
www.phoenixjustice.com
See, that's the critically important bit. That wasn't mentioned anywhere in the post or article. Even when the sentance was bolded.
Even if they ran it from home, they were PAID by the taxpayers to do their work. If they were getting monies from other sources...who were those sources...what was the impact on bidding, elections.
We are not talking about some kids downloading music in their basement here. Which is what you are using the magical powers of cognitive dissonance to equate this to.
"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."
If they ran it from home and did everything at home, or even on lunch breaks, it's not a problem. And mentioning it only distracts from the real bad things they are doing, giving them a platform to build a convenient and distracting straw man on.
I only take drugs in my home, but not a work.
Not a problem, heh.
"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."
Oh come on. People that work in government are allowed to participate in the political process when not on the job. This is a false equivelancy.
Bid rigging is not part of the political process.
Oh...unless it's a Republican administration.
My bad.
"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."
You are conflating things. I never said anything about bid rigging in this thread. That's obviously illegal. I was talking specifically about the bolded sentence from the story about the private network they set up. If they set it up on thier own time utilizing machines they owned privately or where paying for access to with private or campaign funds, there is no problem. Even if they VPNed in to the network from work computers while on a lunch break, it's not really a problem. If they set it up on government owned servers or did work while on the clock for the government, now THAT'S a problem.
You are conflating that because charges haven't been brought yet, that there is no crime.
There is an INVESTIGATION going on.
And, aged wisdom will tell you that where there is smoke, there is often fire.
"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."
...similar but not equivalent to former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin and her administrative staff AND HER HUSBAND all cc: each other doing Alaska government business on 3 different Yahoo! e-mail accounts between 2007 and 2009 -- which were not accessible by the public via Freedom of Information Act requests.
That's the biggest reason the FOIA requests for her government e-mails revealed very little of the malfeasance, misfeasance, and nonfeasance the Palin administration is suspected of .
The situation continues to to this date to be protected by the Alaska Governor Sean Parnell administration, which is corruption in and of itself.
Yup. As I pointed out above, Walker's staff was doing the same thing with this private network, according to other news reports. Weren't there also stories out of the Bush Whitehouse about it being pretty much SOP to never write anything down?
I'm sure that next we will be hearing the Nixon defense..."everybody does it".
"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."
No, I'm saying that you have to make coherant, complete, and relevant arguments. This post included an argument that was not. Walker and his staff sure seem like scum bags to me, but that doesn't absolve his detractors of the responsibility of being honest and accurate.
breaking the law.
Which is exactly the point. The reason there is a law being broken is not made clear.
up a private network to decide which happy hour they were going to attend.
Every public and private entity in the country that is worth a damn has a private network. The relevant questions are what systems it was set up on and who spent time setting it up when.
Not true according to most states public records laws. Your employer has every right to see what you are doing on his dime. We are the politician's employer.
Go ahead and try to set up your own private network that your employer doesn't have access to and see how long you have a job.
I have one at home. If you have a router in your home network, you do too. You getting fired? I'm not.
"During work hours between February 2010 and early July 2010, it says, Rindfleisch sent more than 300 emails to Davis and 1,380 fundraising emails."
"illegally doing extensive political work while being paid by taxpayers to do county jobs."
and you are usually so sharp.
There was nothing that said that the private network was set up using government resources. That's why the information is in seperate, independant paragraphs. We can infer it, but it is not stated explicitly or even implicitly.
while being paid to do government work is enough, that's a big no-no.
Yes. But that wasn't actually stated.
What the hell does the semantics of the article have to do with the crime?
That is a cheap argument trick trying to distract people from the issue.
This article has the real concern.
http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/news/138099588....
The bigger issue is not that they were exchanging campaign info over the network, it was that they were compromising public records and skating around accountability by dealing with public business on the private, non-auditable network. Palin did the same thing in AK, and it all should be very very illegal.
"During work hours" i'm tellin' ya, ya need to lay off the sauce, how it will fog your mind.
"One of the two, Darlene Wink, cut a deal with prosecutors under which she has agreed to provide information in a related investigation about the destruction of digital evidence and to aid in further prosecutions. This is the first indication that the multifaceted John Doe investigation may be pursuing charges of evidence tampering."
"Milwaukee County prosecutors also made the surprising disclosure that top Walker aides set up a private Internet network set up by top Walker aides to allow them to communicate with one another by email about campaign as well as county government work without the public or co-workers' knowledge."
""The emails traded by Walker officials via the shadow government could provide investigators with a trove of information as they pursue other angles in the case. Earlier this week, the Journal Sentinel reported that the probe was focusing on possible bid-rigging and other misconduct in the competition to house the county Department on Aging in private office space."
from: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Can I teach evolution in the Sunday school at your tax-free Church? No?!
Can you use taxpayer money to impose your religious beliefs on others? NO!
Separation of church and state is a wall, not a one-way door.
The Cock brothers cash can't clean up Walker's nasty mess.
When you are doing "God's Work" the gloves come off ..
Just ask Cheney & GW ..
USA! USA USA!
Democracy is too important to be entrusted to politicians.
Rise Up!
Protest!
and right wingers and has been since Tailgunner Joe's days.
No wonder the John Birch Society calls Cheese-landia home. We ought to give it back to the Canadians we stole it from when they were still part of England.
TFR
.when Republicans do it.
The terrorists are "god fearing" too, and since there really is no god, they both act on the same inspirational foundation - an irrational fear/hope of punishment/reward from something they make up in their own minds.
before someone else does and it's off the table." I can't help it. I think it's funny. It will be fun to watch that ship go down.
scott walker's bullshit, ronnie rayguns and the contras, cheny and his stovepipe, nixon and his burglars, believe me if i could list some donkey dung off the top of my head i would, can anyone help me out?
the arrogance of the upper class, as miss leona famously said, "taxes are for little people", just being an ordinary joe looks to me like the whole apparatchik is corrupt as hell.
but leona actually didl jail time ;)
House arrest.
"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."
knew nothing about torture. That was the work of some rogue low level soldiers.
Okay, then where was all this sturm und drang when Bush Too was using the federal Office of National Drug Control Policy to stump for Rethugs? .
This was a national scandal, a massive, repeated violation of the Hatch Act by Republicans acting as Federal officials, a violation that went to the very heart of the democratic process, with that process being undermined for purposes of political favoritism by using the public's taxpayer's dollars against it, and nobody on the Dem side followed through with it.
Picking a fight with a minnow while studiously ignoring a shark biting your leg off. Any wonder why more and more people are identifying themselves as Independents?
This is the problem with the Repugs over the last 30 years; it is 100% campaign all the time.
We used to see the term "election year politics" in the year before the election, meaning that the rest of their term was spent more reasonably getting things done. Now the Repugs have started making it "election year" all the time without bothering to get any real work done. The obstruction is the apitimy of this concept.
We saw it with W's people (lead by KKKarl) who started trying to discredit Clinton even during the transition (remember the bogus missing "W" keys claim that Rovers boys made against Clinton's people?) One of W's press secretaries had that complaint about them when he resigned.
it is 100% campaign all the time.
No, it's one hundred percent on the take all the time.
"Anyone that makes less than $150K in this country, has no business voting Republican."
If you take the events of 9/11 at face value (public
disinformation), it was allowed to happen due to this attitude; they needed to ignore Clinton's warnings about bin Laden to keep him from getting credit for anything they did. So they did nothing, and 3000 American people died. They (Cheney et.el.) then killed another 5000+ of our soldiers and 100,000++ Muslims in their own countries to cover their embarrassment over being willfully asleep at the wheel, basically just trying to make Clinton look bad.This, only based on the public
propagandastory. The real story is probably much worse.Walker is really, really sweating now about what the investigation will show. He had to know what was going on and chose to turned his back to the thefts. The dirtbag should be Recalled soon.
Walker has yet to be contacted about ANY of this - he claims.
If everyone around you is being raided and charged and given immunity from prosecution in order to testify in a John Doe investigation and NO ONE from the Federales is talking to you...
That usually means they're getting everything they need off the wiretap.
Scott 'dead eyes' Walker just seems like a mobster to me. Same for the koch brothers. Mobsters.
"Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob"
-= Franklin Delano Roosevelt =-
Comments are restricted to registered users only.
Login - Register