I agree with most of Kevin Drum's post. Even Bob "Crypt Keeper" Novak has the right to protect his sources. ( we all know of Bob's involvment ) Howeve
June 26, 2005

I agree with most of Kevin Drum's post. Even Bob "Crypt Keeper" Novak has the right to protect his sources. ( we all know of Bob's involvment ) However, I'd like to ask Kevin and or Jeralyn if the journalist "knowingly" commits a crime, or is used like a tool: (ie: outing a C.I.A. operative and Curveball) does that exempt them from the federal shield law for reporters? (If there was actually a law in place) To me it obviously would not. David Ehrenstein writes "A case for silencing anonymous sources" about this issue. By the way that letter by Charles Peters read like something off of Focus on the Family's website.

Duncan writes his brief on the subject here

Talk Left has a thorough and insightful post on all facets of the case. Roxanne has reason to be outraged. Any other blogger send me your reaction to the case.

Steve Gilliard says: Please save our friend. This is truly odious.

David Ehrenstein: A case for silencing anonymous sources Please read it.

Can you help us out?

For nearly 20 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

Discussion

We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.
Mastodon