To their credit, Sens. Clinton and Obama had the courage to vote the right way on the war-funding spending package. The right, predictably, is apoplec
May 24, 2007

To their credit, Sens. Clinton and Obama had the courage to vote the right way on the war-funding spending package. The right, predictably, is apoplectic.

* Don Surber: “Clinton and Obama were among the 14 no votes. Clinton voted to send the troops in. Now she votes not to fund them. Presidential. NOT!”

* Jules Crittenden: “That’s what you want in your commander-in-chief. A vote against troops in the field fighting al-Qaeda and anti-American Iranian stooges.”

* Blogs of War: “Now we’ll have to listen to [Clinton and Obama] make the rounds claiming to support the troops - while denying them the funds they need to fight.”

Um, guys? I hate to sound picky, but didn’t George W. Bush veto war funding less than a month ago? Why is it than the president can reject funds for the troops in a time of war, but Dems can't?

Can you help us out?

For 17 years we have been exposing Washington lies and untangling media deceit, but now Facebook is drowning us in an ocean of right wing lies. Please give a one-time or recurring donation, or buy a year's subscription for an ad-free experience. Thank you.

Discussion

We are currently migrating to Disqus

On May 14, 2022, we started migrating our comments from Insticator back to Disqus. During this transition period, some posts will have Insticator and some Disqus. For more information on the transition, as well as information regarding old C&L accounts, please see this post.


We welcome relevant, respectful comments. Any comments that are sexist or in any other way deemed hateful by our staff will be deleted and constitute grounds for a ban from posting on the site. Please refer to our Terms of Service for information on our posting policy.