O'Reilly wants to sacrifice another 1000 soldiers for the SURGE!
By John Amato Monday Sep 10, 2007 2:45pm
BillO won't cover the violence in Iraq because he thinks it's not relevant to the discussion of the Iraq war. You know those insurgent types are just mugging for the cameras. Will Bill O'Reilly be able to wash the blood out of his hands this time? After all, what's another thousand dead soldiers and a couple more F.U.'s to O'Reilly? And, let's not forget this whopper too. So with that my good C&Lers---I give you another O'Reilly Hall of Shame moment.
Download | play Download | play
O'Reilly: My feeling is that we should allow General Petraeus the resources he needs within a year's time. After that, the Iraqi army must step up and provide their own security with a few American battalions in support. For the future of both the USA and Iraq, that is probably the best course of action in a truly painful situation.
And I agree with emailer Bill who sent in the video and says: O'Reilly: Give Petraeus 1,000 More Dead Soldiers To See If The Surge Will Work
O'Reilly says himself that even though "the USA is likely to lose another thousand killed in the process" we should give Petraeus "the resources he needs within a year's time..." Two more F.U.s and a thousand more dead soldiers, give or take a couple hundred, that's all Bush needs to be able to pass this catastroph*ck onto the next President.
The master propagandist once said that if there were no WMD's found in Iraq, he wouldn't support the Bush administration any longer
Right before U.S. forces invaded Iraq, O'Reilly made a bold promise on ABC about Iraq's WMDs: "If the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush Administration again, all right?"
Nuff said! Email Bill and call his show (1-877-9-NO-SPIN noon to 2 PM ET, but be polite) and ask him if he ever apologized and will he apologize to the Iraqi people and the American troops when his plan plays out and the Iraqi government is still in shambles. Tell him I sent you.
Login or Register to post comments.
Olbermann Kicks your ass
Does anyone *seriously* consider Bill Orally's opinion anymore? This dude's act is way played out.
We should start a website listing #1-#1000 of the next dead American kids and update it every day. Headline: "O'Reilly's 1000 Dead Americans"
SEND BILL
I'm amazed that anyone in the US still takes these maniacs seriously. They were wrong before the war, they're wrong now, and they'll be wrong the next time they tell us we have to ship hundreds of thousands of poor children overseas to die for money and geo-political power.
Bud @ 2:
It's all about the short attention span, fire up the 25% er's and give something to
"discuss" at the water cooler. SAD, SAD, SAD
Talk about infinitely small particles - How about O'Reilly's brain or unit? But I digress.
The douche-bag writer C.S. Lewis viewed quantum mechanics as incomplete, because notions of indeterminism did not agree with his religious beliefs. Fag! Lewis, a professor of English, was of the opinion that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle was more of an knowledge limitation than an indication of existence indeterminacy, and in this respect believed similarly to many advocates of hidden variables theories. The Bohr-Einstein debates provide a vibrant critique of the Copenhagen Interpretation from an epistemological point of view.
The Everett many-worlds interpretation, formulated in 1956, holds that all the possibilities described by quantum theory simultaneously occur in a "multiverse" composed of mostly independent parallel universes and stuff. This is not accomplished by introducing some new axiom to quantum mechanics, but on the contrary by removing the maxim of the collapse of the wave container: All the possible consistent states of the measured system and the measuring apparatus (including the observer) are present in a real physical quantum superposition. (Such a superposition of consistent state combinations of different systems is called an entangled state – see Virginia, Chuck’s mom, etc..) While the multiverse is “caused” by something and we have no free will, we perceive non-deterministic behavior governed by probabilities (or dumb fucking luck, if you’re Bob), because we can observe only the universe, i.e. the consistent state contribution to the mentioned superposition, we inhabit. Everett's interpretation is perfectly consistent with John Bell's experiments and makes them intuitively understandable, even if I’m not. However, according to the theory of quantum decoherence, the parallel universes will never be accessible for us, making them, like Britney Spears, physically meaningless. This inaccessibility can be understood as follows: once a measurement is done, the measured system becomes entangled with both the physicist who measured it and a huge number of other particles, some of which are photons flying away towards the other end of the universe; in order to prove that the wave function did not collapse one would have to bring all these particles back and measure them again, together with the system that was measured originally. This is completely impractical, but even if one can theoretically do this, it would destroy any evidence that the original measurement took place (including the physicist's memory), so we’re fucked!
One way to stop the war.
STOP the no bid contracts. Hell, "draft" these contractors like you would a civilian into the army. Let's see how that effects the "surge". They would be out within 2 months. period.
Is he willing to be one of those lives?
It's very easy to be very brave when it's someone else's life that's is on the line. Just look at the bravery of the Greatest Commander-In-Chief that this country has ever known and you'll see what I mean.
Joseph Stalin: “One death is a tragedy; a million is a statistic.”
http://icasualties.org/oif/
Shouldn't that read SPLURGE!
What happened to the Cost/Benefit Analysis Republicant's wanted to apply to all of Clinton's proposals?
Send O'Lielly. Let him die for his cause.
Send Shammity, he's Catholic, and I heartell they like to worship martyrs.
And all the Civil War veterans in O'Reilly's audience cheered
William Wallace @ 12:
Heck, why don't you go? And don't forget the blue woad.
Oh bill, just shut the fu*k up and we'll call you when we need your opinion. Don't wait by the phone, it could be a while.
There was a repub today questioning Petraeus and during his question the repug said we didn't find wmd in Iraq but we found pieces of them. Pieces of wmd?
Let's not forget this gem - Oct. 3, 2005, Bill O interviewed Gen. Wes Clark.
"But there has to be a limit to our largesse and to our sacrifice. Because we have made a great sacrifice for that country. So I would say that you've got to give the Iraqis another year, year and a half to train their army and police to be able to defend themselves against these terrible awful terrorists who are trying to disrupt that country."
Next month it will be 2 years, and Bill O still wants us to continue.
So Billo, when are you going to apologize?
Lowlife.
This from a man who has never served in the military. It is odd to me that people like O'Reilly are quick to send someone else's son or daughter to die for the Bush administrations mistakes and failed policies. It begs the question: What if it were their son or daughter?
Just one more year...no more. That's it. One more. After that there is no more. Just one.
Geez Bill - is that the new O-Unit? One year?
The lower his ratings the more crazy he makes himself sound.
He can walk and carry a gun.
And that big mouth could store a lot of extra magazines.
Off you go, old boy.
Keep pushing that line and Keith will drive bill's ratings into the toilet.
My Polish neighbor says, "Americans are so naive. They think the news is the news. In Poland, everyone knows it's propaganda."
OH GOD DAMN IT
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/09/11/bush.iraq.ap/index.html
Looks like Cheney told Chimp what Orally said...
billo is just one more hypocrite draft dodger. he is pathethic.
when billo walks into the room even the smell of shit pells.
He can walk and carry a gun.
And that big mouth could store a lot of extra magazines.
Off you go, old boy.
Thanks for making me laugh out loud Ozguy.
When is O'Reilly going to get shown up for the complete Bush sycophant he is.
I notice he no longer ventures away from his pre recorded home territory.
I'd love to see a strong left winger debate him in neutral territory and just humiliate him with facts and logic. Shouldn't be that difficult to arrange.
What happened to the Iraqis having 2 months to make the political steps and meeting the benchmarks or it's all over and we should give up on them and leave, Bill?
I'm so sick and tired of these assholes willing to continue this farce with other people's lives.
And here I thunk that only "Pagans" practiced hecatombs.
O'Reilly has seen combat. So have I, they used to show the reruns on TV though I can't remember on what channel.
Leading the charge from the rear, as per usual.
Bud @ 25:
boosh can't lay any conditions on withdrawing the 30,000 troops. That's when the surge folk are scheduled to come home. They won't be replaced because recruitment is down. The only other option would be a stop loss order.
miss_kitty @ 31:
Isn't that what Larry Craig's been accused of?
Ok, so most of us are of the same opinion: Bill O'Reilly is a lying blow-hard fake of a journalist who's not to be taken seriously. The big question is this:
How do we move this knowledge out into our mainstream society?
I mean, just imagine if we managed to break the evil spell that Fox Noise casts on our elderly parents and grandparents! Fox News would eventually dry up and go away, I'd bet.
pissed off patricia @ 16:
Pieces of WMD can be found anywhere.
WMDs and their delivery systems are made from metals, plastics, natural gas, oil, air and rocks. These things can be found in every country.
ysbaddaden @ 32:
Indeed.
A typical numbers game with budgets is to overestimate by a large percentage, then later make a correction. For example: Total needed $700, amount requested $1500, amount given $1000. You just SAVED 50% off the budget! Good job!
Same thing is happening with the “troop withdrawal.” Current numbers CAN’T be sustained; there are just not enough troops in all of the military. The 30,000 troops that were just reported as a reduction is the necessary reassignment because of the (now) 15 month rotation limit. They were coming home anyway.
Its funny how the GOP and their zombie army confuse things;
Gay is something you choose to be not something your born. So if we isolate kids from gays and their agenda they wont get infected by the idea.
Al quaida is something your apparently born as, so if you kill and capture enough of them the problem is solved.
What i'm trying to say is; how is creating more destitute not radicalizing more young arab kids?
WPITW time again, I miss him being the Worst person, what has it been, 2 days?
I can't believe BillO's viewers haven't figured out they are being lied to. Are they really that clueless? I mean, even on Sesame Street the numbers have to add up.
Is it just me or is the wmv not working?
i saw him apologize on gma. it's the other half of his promise that he failed to live up to.
OT, but important:
Dollar sinks to fifteen year low
You've got quite an economic plan in place Herr Deciderer! Your house of cards is falling down, you fucking dunce!
Dr. Acula @ 42:
A lot of countries want a low exchange rate. China purposefully keeps theirs low. The low dollar just makes imports more expensive and it easier to export domestic-made goods. Oh wait, we don't actually produce anything in the US anymore.
Damn! I have to agree then.
Hey the economy is fine. We have bin Laden on the run. We are bringing troops home so that means we won the war.
It's so much easier if you just repeat what you are told and don't bother to use your brain. No wonder the right-wing nuts seem so content, they don't have to do much but follow wherever someone pulls their leash.
miss_kitty @ 31:
Well at least he's got our backs...
Isn't that an oxymoron: the surge is working, violence is supposedly coming down, YET we can still anticipate the loss of 1000 troops in the next year?! Just doesn't add up.
pissed off patricia @ 44:
They economy is fine. We have bin Laden on the run. We are bringing troops home, so that means we won the war.
Hey! I do feel better - thanks.
I think O boy should set up his stage in the market square in Baghdad and just SHOW us how great this surge is working out. He could give us hourly updates between dodging bullets, IED's, mobs.. but he'd have to bring his own security. No wasting the time of our military -- they have work to do. I'd watch that....
yeah, the man who has seen 'combat' has an opinion.
Disturbed anti-war protester can't find soldier, kills civilian with axe instead
How many more lives lost can we anticipate from these anti-war protesters?
dennis @ 50:
dennis, did you read the latest update on that story? Obviously not. That guy with the ax is an ex-US Airman.
Does anyone remeber the Gulf of Tonkin? Stage an attack on a US Ship off the coast of IRAN! Then they have THE reason to bomb IRAN! Perfect....Protect the Petro Dollar at all costs.
dennis @ 50:
Yeah, because ALL anti-war protesters are completely insane and regularly randomly kill people.
:rolleyes: (you fucking idiot)
Strawberry @ 51:
Hey, so am I.
The Petro dollar is going to sink. There is nothing Herr Deciderer and his henchman can do about it except forstall it!
justabill @ 43:
I like hummus on my falafel. Loofah!
dennis @ 50:
None. They caught the guy.
Falafel Bill blows. Petraeus is recommending getting back to pre-surge levels by I think either next April or summer. If it's going to be 1000 troops just for the surge, then it's going to be even more once we get to pre-surge levels. If Bush has his way, well over 100,000 troops will still be there until the end of his term.....more deaths. IF a Repug becomes the next president (God forbid), then those troops will be there another 4 years.....even more deaths.
I just don't know how O'Reilly or Bush and his gang can sleep at night.
Does anyone remeber the Gulf of Tonkin? Stage an attack on a US Ship off the coast of IRAN! Then they have THE reason to bomb IRAN! Perfect….Protect the Petro Dollar at all costs.
I was born in 1967 but most of us are aware of that fable.
Are we having a deja-vu moment yet? The Petraeus/Bush Iraq 'affair' is like looking back to the Westmoreland/Nixon Vietnam "oh, we just need more time" affair.
Watch 'General Petraeus in Planet Of The Apes: The Senate Testimony Musical'
http://tootruthy.blogspot.com/2007/09/petraeus-youll-never-make-westmore...
I hate every Senator I see
From Mike Crapo to Pat Leahy
Oh, you'll never make Westmoreland out of me
Oh no! I was wrong. It was a civil war all along!
Guess you've finally made Westmoreland out of me.
Most of orallys' audience are geriatric. Most of his ratings are from TV's being left on in the ward rooms of rest homes and psych hospitals, they're on but noone is watching.
If I was Olberman, I would play the video of Bill O' Riley lying about not trusting the Bush Administration if no WMD were found. Amercia needs to see it. Instead, O'Riley has done nothing but priase Bush after we all learned that Bush had lied about WMDs.
It is sad in two ways. One is the sadness for people who died that day. That is uncontested. What is contested are the reasons why.
Since I have accepted as fact the official story is full of controversy, lies, cover-ups and fabrications I mourn for the loss of intelligence in the general media controlled American populace. I see most of them as one looks upon ignorant children. I see those who support it as arrogant children.
There are growing numbers of us even though media never covers it. We are not kooks or "hatters" but instead engineers, pilots, artists and writers. Mainstream Americans, and we are mourning the death of America too.
Even granny knows.
http://www.grannywarriors.com/
Yes, there is a Southern slant to this but I am greatful for what they do know.
While most are glued to the propaganda of Iraq I'm taking an asset inventory of things we will need in the coming depression. Who is going to loose which house, where can the kids go, you know normal stuff like that.
Can't wait for this day to be over and the depression of millions of lied to, mostly very good people will once again be over.
The other good thing is that winter is coming and the horsemanure pile won't smell as much.
Actually, the Giant Talking Head *did* concede that he was wrong about the WMD's in an appearance on Leno a few years back (2004?), but defended his continuing support of the Bush White House on the grounds of "an Iraq/alQaeda connection we didn't even know existed before we went in." And despite the fact the WH has since conceded that there was no Iraq/alQaeda connection before we invaded, Fallafel-Guy still hasn't lived up to his word of never trusting this WH again.
Mugsy @ 64:
No Erasamus was hoping you would forget that, thinking Americans only think short term, not realizing that liberals and progressives know about history pretty well, he is just playing to his base. He also does not realize tapes and transcripts exist and his erasure skills only work on Fox Noise and his website, he cannot erase them from legitimate sources.
Rusty Shackleford @ 14:
Best comment on this thread.
moondancer @ 61:
I was recently on vacation near Yellowstone and I noticed that wherever there was a public tee-vee, like in an airport or hotel, it would be tuned to Faux Noise. I don't think it was by accident.
O'Really(?) is a worthless, steaming pile of sh*t. He has nothing in this fight...none of his blood or the his children's blood is at risk. It's so f-ing easy to support a war when you have nothing at stake.
What the hell do he and all the neocons care about how many more military members die in Iraq?
They have no skin in the game. All they have to lose is kickbacks from Halliburton, et al.
BIllO lies again, Moveon.org only payed $75,000 for the NYT ad according to their spokesman on the Hardball last night . Not the "over $100,000" BillO stated. This guy can't tell the truth about ANYTHING.
Bill, do your show from Bagdad for a year, you ass.
"My feeling is that we should allow General Petraeus the resources he needs within a year’s time"
..followed by a six week period to assess the situation on the ground then a 6 month review,another 4 week study,then a two year phase down period ending in a one year redeployment of resources following a 5 day summit to decide on a 6 month waiting period...
billo can go fuck himself.
like OBL, billo should be removed from the face of the earth for his lies about the war and his obvious support of OBL.
BillO is a sexual predator.
After Dubya and Cheney leave, BillO will be looking for work back at "A Current Affair" and some other production assistant to molest.
BillO is a lying right-wing bush loving coward!!!
I think he's trying to be amusing. Why else would he not be bothered that so many know that he is lying? Oh, I forgot, he is a short sighted fool who is only interested in himself.
I'm a Democrat, and as much as I hate to admit it, I saw O'Reilly apologize on air for supporting entrance into Iraq.
Here is a story on his apology. http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/clock.htm
Brad says: Let’s not forget this gem - Oct. 3, 2005, Bill O interviewed Gen. Wes Clark.
“But there has to be a limit to our largesse and to our sacrifice. Because we have made a great sacrifice for that country. So I would say that you’ve got to give the Iraqis another year, year and a half to train their army and police to be able to defend themselves against these terrible awful terrorists who are trying to disrupt that country.”
Next month it will be 2 years, and Bill O still wants us to continue.
+++++++++++
Don't forget this timetable gem either: http://mediamatters.org/items/200701250014
Bill O'Reilly, man with absolutely no credibility
But he still supports the war Jesse Holmes. He would love to see it continue so that the draft will be reinstated which will help to help get rid of all those vile Hispanics and Black people. That is the limit of what tiny bit of intellect he has and everything else revolves around that thought.
Ah, Classic Bill! I wish I could buy him a one way ticket to Baghdad and a rifle.
Charles @ 81:
Bill could be one of the 1,000, and have his pick of 72 virgins in the afterlife.
arroyo @ 82:
He would probably take that if he could be assured that all of those virgins are male.
Retired Navy @ 83:
Just realized how offensive my comment may be to the gay community. No offense intended.
of course O' Reilly is an idiot overall. why do so many people comment just to say that?
how would you all respond to the argument that Iran will move into Iraq if we move out? He seems to think that is some kind of trump card argument.
My answer would be, A) these two countries fought a bloody war- shiites in power or not- there is no way Iraqi Arabs are going to allow the Persian Iranians to just "take over" without a fight. B) Iran knows this and after observing the US failed occupation would be the STUPIDEST regime on the planet to try their hand at it. C) Iran knows Israel AND the US would never allow them to invade Iraq without a massive response (maybe nuclear). That would just give the neocons another excuse to invade Iran.
O'Rielly sounds just like our Imperator, the Chimp. All he wants is just one more year, or just six more months, or seven more months, or until October, or ...
txlvn @ 48:
You and just about every other person to the left of Attila the Hun would love to watch the Bill in Bagdad show. I would even reprogram my clicker and put Fox News back on it.
Rob @ 68:
That is absolutely unfair to say about O'Reilly. He is doing his part for the war effort. I understand that he spends hours on the phone daily talking dirty to female soldiers over there in an effort to keep their morale up.
Jim: "We should start a website listing #1-#1000 of the next dead American kids and update it every day. Headline: “O’Reilly’s 1000 Dead Americans”"
A very good idea especially since on tonight's show O'Reilly stated that if any muslim man joins the jihad and kills an American because of Brian DePalma's new movie "Redacted", it is on DePalma. The next 1,000 deaths are on O'Reilly. What's good for the DePalma is good for the O'Reilly.
i totally agree send another 1000 as long as their bill oreilly fans
Billy boy is an idiot and a coward, the Onion has got his number http://www.theonion.com/content/opinion/maybe_we_should_try_coddling
Here's my all time favorite on O'Lielly....Its also Al Franken's favorite
And another reason why I'm moving to Oregon...
Later, O'Reilly was challenged by a caller from Portland named Roger:
O'REILLY: We've got a caller. Roger. Roger from Portland, Oregon. What say you Roger?
ROGER: Yeah, hey, Bill. First things first. You just said you've been in combat, but you've never been in the military, have you?
O'REILLY: No I have not.
ROGER: Then why do you say you've been in combat?
O'REILLY: Why do I say that, Roger? Because I was in the middle of a couple of firefights in South and Central America.
ROGER: But you were a media guy.
O'REILLY: Yeah. A media guy with a pen, not a gun. And people were shooting at me, Roger.
ROGER: People might think that you actually were in the military.
O'REILLY: Oh... We don't want to mislead anybody. But I made it quite clear... quite clear in many, many circumstances --
ROGER: [mumbles something about being, or not being, "fair and balanced"]
O'REILLY: [quietly disconnects Roger] Yeah. Hey listen, Roger. You can take your little "fair and balanced" uh... snip remark and shove it, okay? You're not getting on this air. Um... You, mister macho man, have never come close to anything I've done, down where I've been. So take a walk and... uh... 'nuff said.
Five months later on May 5, 2005 he once again implied he had combat experience when he made the following comment in an interview with Col. P. J. Crowley (USAF-Ret) and Col. Neal Puckett (USMC-Ret):
O'REILLY: Have you been in combat Colonel?
CROWLEY: Yes.
PUCKETT: Me? No, sir, I have not.
O'REILLY: How 'bout you, Colonel?
CROWLEY: Yes.
O'REILLY: So you know what we're talkin' about. "Cause I was in combat and when you are there your adrenalin is flying through your ears. And you know you've got the gun and I just couldn't understand ...
Ahhhh.....why in the world people watch this waste.....
Sorry...blew it...
Here's the first part of that...which set Roger in Portland into motion:
First, there was the infamous January 18, 2005 Radio Factor broadcast where he stated:
"I've seen it. I've been close to it. And if I'm... my unit is in danger, and I've got a captured guy, and the guy knows where the enemy is, and I'm looking him in the eye, the guy better tell me. That's all I'm gonna tell you. He better tell me. If it's life or death, he's going first."
Why doesn't O'Lielly volunteer his listening audience?
Oh wait, he mayn't have enough. They're probably too old too.
Smack_dab @ 67:
Peter Noone?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHLbBXwWim0
[...] O’REILY: LETS SACRIFICE ANOTHER 1000 US TROOPS [...]
What was the name of that box-office smash movie some years ago? Oh yeah... Kill Bill!
Login or Register to post comments.