Tom Friedman: "Suck on this, Iraq"
By Nicole Belle Wednesday Sep 12, 2007 4:01pmI so wish I was just being snarky. Atrios found this from the Charlie Rose Show:
I am so horrified by this macho over-compensation manifesting itself as foreign policy that I must again ask, when you say something so heinous, so egregious, so over-the-top offensive, why in the HELL are you allowed a continued place on the national platform?
I think that Tom "F.U." Friedman and the NYTimes public editor deserve to have you ask them that question, don't you? Otherwise, I'm thinking that maybe we should take up a collection to send Tom to Basra (no Kevlar vest in the Green Zone, guarded by 100 troops and Blackhawk helicopters for him) and let him go door to door and see how the Iraqis left would respond.








Login or Register to post comments.
Fristman unit!
"...you're just an errand boy sent by grocery clerks to collect the bill..."
Kathy Griffin delivers that line funnier...
Phillip Weiss said we should be listening to Henry Siegman instead but he's not invited anywhere.
Let Us Praise the Greatest Mensch Who Walks the Earth. Henry Siegman
http://www.philipweiss.org/mondoweiss/2007/09/today-let-us-pr.html
Is there a transcript? I find a lot of these disgusting idiots difficult to watch.
Sorry, but:
"You was in the wrong place at the wrong time, f****t."
Is NOT an effective foreign policy, Mr. Friedman.
Yeesh. He's so clearly getting his jollies saying that.
why so late to the party on this one?
this video has been bandied about for the last few months.
and i love C&L, but frequently you all post some bit of news that's at least a week old. i can't be the only one to notice this.
Wow, Friedman speaks as annoyingly as he writes, with that lightly condescending tone and annoying metaphors. Shut up dude.
"Suck on this" is not a foreign policy.
It's time to stop letting the children run things.
Why is it so easy for these macho clowns to differentiate between countries and their own neighborhoods? Could not this same argument be used to go door-to-door in LA, killing and terrorizing everyone because you were car-jacked six-blocks away? Might as well take all their possessions and burn down the house too – just to show’em who’s boss. “What part of this do you not understand, ‘I was car-jacked!’”
It doesn’t matter that they’re in a different country; the people in those neighborhoods DIDN’T FUCKING DO IT! And remember, we we’re there to PROTECT them and RESCUE them from Sadaam and his WMDs – not TEACH THEM A LESSON.
This bellicose beat’em up mentality works only as long as it’s not YOUR house they’re breaking into. But that’s what bullies do; they beat up the little guy because they’re so fearful themselves.
On the other side however, he was somewhat refreshingly honest in saying that we started a war in Iraq (as opposed to other MidEast countries) simply "Because we could". He didn't try to obscure the reasons with WMD/Democracy/AQI/OverThereNotOverHere/etc. He just kind of confirms the most cynical reasons for starting a war of choice: 1. to "carry a big stick", 2. to break a bubble of mideastern perception of the US, 3. Becuase we could. I wish the other "pundits" were this honest.
What a complete dickhead. Fine to send "our" boys and girls over there to go house to house. "Our"???? You got a turd in your pocket you think tank piece of shit? Suck on that you asshole!
You are allowed a place in the national media because THEY ARE IN ON IT. There is no other explanation for these pundits being so historically wrong and not only escaping any damage to their careers, but as in the case of Bill Kristol, actually being rewarded with a column in Time.
THERE IS NO OTHER EXPLANATION. Stop scratching your heads.
oh wait, shhhhh, everyone be quiet, thomas FRIEDMAN, the smartest man on the planet, is going to speak....
/snark off
but, seriously folks, this douchebag must be ridiculed at every possile moment. friedman has been proven wrong almost as much as paul wolfotwits.
and the fact that people read 'the earth is flat' and take it seriously still astonishes me. the man is never right, believes his own bullshit (to a scary degree), and still is treated like some sort of svengali... i think i am going to go pull my hair out one by one.
FU indeed tom, FU indeed.
Oooh. He's on Charlie Rose. That's means he gotta say sumpin' smart. Douche.
They ought to send these hawks to Anbar to show the Iraqis the ways of freedom and democracy. I guarantee the Iraqi response will be "suck on this".
Hey, at least he seems like he is being honest about what he feels. Refreshing aye? Makes you wonder if other pro war politicians think this but know how much trouble they would get in if they said it.
My gaydar is going off again-- BIG time!!! He's acting "macho" to hide a secret. I've seen it a million times. Ha ha ha, what a loser. I think this is the first time I've seen this guy. Hopefully the last. What a cretin.
PS Friedman, if you wanna score with the boys do something about your hair-- actually get a total make-over. Simply repulsive. My flesh would crawl if you touched me.
Tom Friedman has the credibility of some of Jerry Springer's guests. Heck, he even uses the same language. If it weren't for the black background one could have easily confused this video with a clip from the Jerry Springer show.
...Holy shit. That's some evolved discourse for you. "Suck on this."
When was this?
Just watch his hands flit around and his head bobble on a gymbal. The more he tries to act like a man, the more his bodylanguage looks like a strung-out transvestite hooker.
.
You must understand: It's not only the World, but Friedman's "brain waves" that are "flat."
I always get a laugh when I watch people like Tom Friedman. Oh sure they have the tough talk down pat but they never had the guts nor the brains to go along with it. They have been wrong about everything in Iraq but yet they still get up there and beat their gums. Besides, its "geniuses" like friedman that shifted the balance in the Middle East to Iran. They did this by removing Hussein and the Taliban. Real smooth nitwit!
Frankly, I do not see a "mancho man" sitting there on that screen. I see a fool that should be ignored or at worse, thrown out of the building.
"Suck on this"? For the sake of humanity, please please, leave it in your pants (or call Larry Craig. I hear he's tapping for action.)
Another Iraq war cheerleader bites the dust.
Will Friedman follow Judy Miller to rightwing thinktank Manhattan Institute?
Six months!
Since shame is extinct, maybe regret could be resuscitated.
Paleoliberals 1
Neocons 0
Can we send his atrocious combover to Iraq?
he's crazy
Boy I tell ya. Times sure have changed. I have read that in history, many advisors to countries that where this incompetent and wrong as Friedman where either thrown out or sent to the front lines. Some where even beheaded by the ruler that listened to them. George Bush on the other hand likes to promote these people. The more incomptent and wrong they are the more Bush likes them.
I abhor violence. But I hope someone, someday makes thia man face the hell he and his ilk have unleashed on so many innocents.
Why aren't these developmentally delayed morons being institutionalized instead of interviewed? Are we as a nation so morally bankrupt that this is considered a reasonable and responsible voice?
If so, we deserve the consequences that will surely come from listening to this "man".
I enjoyed learning that we hit Iraq for the same reason that a dog licks his balls.
That clip is from the 30 May 2003 show. Just a couple of months after the start of the war.
There's not much to suck on, sir.
Or in other words: You can throw out your faux-macho analogies as much as you want, "that part of the world", as you call it, thinks that they got us by the balls pretty good. If this whole sorry enterprise was meant to impress someone it's gone pretty badly wrong. Cause everybody now sees, what a little "insurgence" can do to our moral.
So much for locker room policies. Well done, indeed.
This guy is a nutcase, BIG time. Reminds me of tirade from some drunkard. He is part of the the 36% .
If anyone ever needed a bitch-slappin', he's the man.
"Because we could"???? What happened to the WMD and the mushroom cloud, Tommy-boy. You're nothing but a big-talking, cowardly creep.
He sounds like Ted Nugent. I wonder why these guys are so obsessed with making other guys suck on things?
I'm astounded; I've never liked Tom, but normally he is at least a bit more subtle, and doesn't babble about bubbles. Honestly, what is he talking about other than lashing out in misguided rage? Props to Dave for the Apocalypse Now reference.
It would appear the only thing standing between Tom F. and a oneway ticket to the Funny Farm are his good personal grooming habits.
Nicole,
I think maybe this will end if Clinton were elected?
For me I personally believe that US Americans will be safer if we elected the first woman capable of being elected...
Look at the Nordic countries! There are a significant number of women in public offices and you see how they wage wars with the world?
THEY DRAW CARTOONS OF THEIR ENEMIES!!! hahahahahahahaha
Actually I think this is a good way to solve a lot of the world's problems!!! If everyone did it...
Tom Friedman married a billionaire but the media lets him do the "average guy" shtick
"something so heinous, so egregious, so over-the-top offensive"
Best definition of American national platform I've heard.
What he fails to metion is he is a for Israel only writer. Protect and defend Israel at all costs. Thats the message he is hiding under all his posturing. And that includes most of the Irag study group too. Perle, wolfowitz, on and on it goes.
This guy looks like he can be found any evening down on all fours in some men's room!
I've come up with a new definition that fits Friedman and his Neocon buddies. We will call them what they really are:
Neron-(n): 1. A cross between the Roman Emperor Nero and a Moron. 2. A person that thinks they are as ruthless, tough, and sadistic as the Roman Emperor Nero but tend to be totally incompetent and wrong about every military conflict.
Grand Moff Texan @ 19:
That's the funniest thing I've ever read. LMAO.
Actually, 'Suck on this' is probably what was going through the heads of bastards who flew those planes into the WTC in the first place. When are we going to stop listening to simpletons who reduce geopolitics down to the level school yard shit-talk???
Sometimes "a very big stick", is just that,a weapon, a stick.
Unless one follows with the "suck on this" schtick.
As he abuses his Astroglide to keep his hair slick.
(snick)
Well, I just emailed the NYT, telling them what an idiot I think Friedman is, and that I couldn't understand why they keep publishing him. I am sure they will reply saying that I am a fool who doesn't understand the intricacies of US foreign policy as the Very Serious People Who Write For The Very Serious Establishment Media. But then, I am only a patriotic American who deosn't really want to see my fellow country run through a meat grinder. Pity my foolishness. Maybe I'll change my mind in SIX MONTHS (LOL!).
Thomas Friedman, ehh... I give up
I think I'm going to be ill...
It's fascinating that the clip you have following this is from a real journalist and a real man named Walter Cronkite. Friedman isn't even man enough to shine Cronkite's shoes.
Quoting Ted Nugent!@#$%^ - that's it, I'm moving to Never Never Land. Who's he going to quote next, Ted Bundy??
Friedman is an ass.
Well, I wrote to CBS about Katie, and now I've written the NYT about Little Tommy:
"Friedman has been wrong on just about everything concerning the Iraq War, and has been insulting readers with his "suck on this" attitude. Why does the NYT still publish him? But I guess you're giving him another six months - the same amount of time Tommy always says is needed to win in Iraq. No wonder some people call it "journamalism". Maybe he should team up with Katie Couric and Alexis Debat."
And I am sure I will get the same type of response, that I could not possibly understand the intricacies of US foreign policy as much as The Very Serious People Writing For The Very Serious Established Media.
What do I know anyway? I mean, I read BLOGS! Heavens to Murgatroid!
Of course, Friedman's discourse is odious; it's the Neocon game plan without mentioning the oil. The Project For A New American Century is distinguishable from Hitler's Third Reich only in that the Neocons are more delusional. Hitler didn't expect to be welcomed as a liberator, didn't expect Nazism to bloom among the local population, and when he said "Suck On This," there were ovens to deal with the result.
BTW, I welcome C&L posting material that isn't fresh-off-the-shelf. This website is a valuable repository--our "institutional memory"--for the time when we need to know who got us where we are and how they did it. The number of Americans familiar with the principles and precepts this country was founded on and what they mean in practice is withering under the onslaught of conservative media and the brand of aggressive ignorance they're peddling these days. C&L is one of the counterweights to the Mighty Right-wing Wurlitzer.
Oh Brother!
Nicole, not having read your blog earlier, I was at DKos and wrote almost the same comment you did, only I was referring to boner and the "small price" to pay. Everyone of these mouthy rat bas***** should be set down in the middle of Baghdad and left to find their way out , OR NOT.
r @ 29:
Nicely said, thanks for spoiling my dinner. For some reason I'm just not very hungry after having that "understanding" flash through my mind.
What a dope.
wow! ! ! What a tough guy. Maybe if he went to Iraq our problems would be over !
could some one date this interview for me?
What a clueless asshole!
Macdaffy @ 53:
Agreed. It is good to be reminded from time to time about the comments that got us into Iraq and Friedman's fits that bill.
Another double chinned warrior want to be.
Never mind-- 2003
Michael @ 10:
Ha ha...you have a point there. The truth, no matter how disgusting or disgustingly presented, is (in a macabre sort of way in this case) rather refreshing to hear. It's about time one of "them" said it, since we've been saying it all along.
Is this dickhead even making any sense? I've watched this twice already and I am clueless as to what the fuck he is even talking about. Anybody care to break it down for me?
This ivy league asshole thinks he's so smart.
Thought about this...
We are living in a country where there is in-fighting everywhere...fights in the home, fights in school, fights in work, fights in government.
I think this war is still being fought because too many people think that the answer can be found with the US government, indeed any really. The whole entire world is waiting for the US to pull out of Iraq. I mean, why isn't the whole world stopping the war? What if the whole world decided to go into Iraq and fight back the Americans who are fighting for us only?
I know soldiers, and they need to feel like the whole world is behind them, not just their own country. When you fight in a war, you are fighting on behalf of "humanity" in it's most perfect state of being (which isn't acheivable but we have to keep thinking there is)...a state that is in a peaceful position...
The whole world is NOT doing anything to make a difference, which is telling many of the soldiers that there is at least one reason to keep fighting...this one and only reason is "I'm still alive"...
See that's the swear they take..."To fight until I am killed"
Many soldiers can't live by this doctrine as it is something that not everyone can agree on...everyone needs to agree for something to be called a truth nowadays...truth by majority...if we can trick people and get them into forming the "majority" opinion that gives us control of the world, we can do ANYTHING WE WANT...and what we want is for people to not fight anymore....not in their homes, school or anywhere...
So we will do whatever we can do trick people into the majority, and once we have control, we will then stop the fighting. Don't ask me what kind of group the winner will be, as long as there is no fighting in the world. Then once one power is in control, it will be up to future generations to decide how to gain more peace. We are not leaving our children the worst world in history...
WW2 left the world in literal shambles everywhere, yet the human race lived on. This war in Iraq is NOTHING compared to both world wars...so there is no reason to be afraid, we will live through this one...we will be ok...
Racist bastard. The idea that Iraq needs to be hit because a few radical Saudis attacked us "to show that part of the world" is insane. It's as if Canada attacked some Eurpoean country and that country then struck the United States "to show that part of the world".
Joe O. @ 61:
I suppose the difference is the Nazis went house to house rounding people up to put them into concentration camps before killing them. The U.S. is simply going house to house and killing them. Or skipping the house-to-house bit and hitting them with "targeted strikes."
Where does this jackass get off saying we need to "burst the bubble" of other sovereign nations? And does he really think by invading a sovereign nation, the U.S. is asserting some sort of control, or "bursting bubbles"?
The only bubble that got burst was the bubble the U.S. was living in until 9/11.
effin ahole...what happened to the NY Times? if it went down I wouldn't blink save for Mo Dowd, Bob Herbert and Nik Kristof -- ok, maybe Gail Collins once in a while.........saw him a few months ago in NY....wanted to go Ving Rhames Medevial on him re his support for Bushelhead on the war -- at my 5'10" nad his barely 5 whatever, he looked at me like lady i'm just getting my coffee don't bug me....wait till Iran heats up....
I really tried to come up with some witty and crushing comment to make here, but, really, that video speaks for itself.
Really, all Neo-cons ought to be entirely prevented from shaping or enacting foreign policy. Gay men are just too emotional.
“Suck on this” is not a foreign policy.
It’s time to stop letting the children run things.
Amen. Good grief, what a dope. Didn't he realize how stupid that sounded? Oh, wait... nevermind...
"...and suck on this."
That man is a sicko. Nobody between "Baghdad and Basra" - as he put it - had anything whatsoever to do with attacking or threatening our country.
That is really disgusting.
Nobody but Faux Noise viewers believe this pack of lies anymore.
I've got better things of a current nature to view/read than a video from MAY of 2003...
Plenty of his Rethug buddies lately are sucking on this with anyone willing.
Do they not understand that Wars have been fought over less?
"..why in the HELL are you allowed a continued place on the national platform"?
The answer is simple, Nicole.
The airwaves are in no way, shape, or form a "national platform". The airwaves are owned lock, stock, and barrel by corporations. "News" broadcasts are little more than soap opera's, because that's the way Disney, and GE, and the whole rotten lot them want it.
You know that, of course.
So long as otherwise astute people are content to criticize the light show and ignore the beasts behind the curtain, political dialogue in this country will remain suppressed. Mathews, Russert, Stephanopolous, are individuals employed by private sector corporations who will fire them if they refuse to tow the company line. That's a simple truth. If not them, there would be others parroting the same line of BS.
But like I said, you know all that.
As bad as Ann Coulter, and just as loathsome.
Didn't Larry Craig say the same thing to that undercover cop in the Minneapolis men's room?
Must be a Republican/Neo-con thing.
Maybe Oprah will convince this creep to also go out on the campaign trail with Obama. Ya do have to be careful with the company you keep.
What's his address?
Is Friedman drunk or on drugs in this video ? He seems unstable.
Why does he have a job? Shouldn't he be in an institution ?
This along the same line of thought:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18371.htm
What I would give to see this hairball strap on the gear and make the trek from house to house in the desert in order to domineer a people that will do their best to turn him into a grease spot in the dirt.
Satan Himself @ 18:
Right after "We're kickin' a**"
telecom @ 71:
I am a hetero-sexual male and I don’t to see what gay men have to do with Friedman being the psycho that he is. Care to explain?
Who is this smug prick, he looks like he is manicured and irons his underpants!.
Fancy having the audacity to speak of war death and destruction in these moronic tones.
- JJ
OMG. Why is it those people can say anything, however offensive and cruel with an arrogance that is mind-bending and it's OK. Are they really that mean, or is there something else in it for them? I'd like to think he's being paid to be mean, and that he's only being cruel for profit. Otherwise, I'd have to believe that he believes what he's saying - and most of these people are so intellectually dishonest that can't be it - they don't have the courage of their convictions - they are puppets. If some other swaggering, macho faux cowboy was in there saying everything exactly opposite - with enough authority and bravado - he'd be parroting those talking points instead. They don't know how to behave without their abusive fathers. They govern by battered-wives syndrome.
what an asshole.
The bubble that got burst was the racist wet-dream that American military power can be a transformational tool for the bringing of western-style democracy anywhere in the world. If you read the Project for a New American Century's (PNAC) manifesto, its centerpiece is the taking of Iraq as the keystone to securing the entire region for the projection of American power and influence. They tried to get Bill Clinton to do it and he told them to piss off, so they made sure that someone just stupid and malleable enough to believe them was elected in 2000--thus, the vitriolic campaign against Al Gore.
The plan was to kill Saddam, set up a puppet American government in Iraq, kick Iran's ass, and start drilling. A sweet deal if it weren't for the racist and boneheaded notion that any population anywhere will acquiesce to occupation by a foreign power--no matter how benevolent the reason. I'm just a jerk with a few years of college under his belt, and I could have told them it wasn't going to work. Western-style democracy as practiced in the US is an elaborate scam and needs the right conditions to flourish. Turning the Middle East into Europe and Japan in the Forties is magical thinking of the most tragic sort.
And I repeat--I don't care if it's from May of 2003: Sometimes, it's educational to play "That Was Then, This Is Now."
Patthemokey @ 62:
He's a bit jowly, too. The 'stache doesn't quite camouflage it.
I am so impressed by Tom's manhood, in a completely heterosexual way!
I wonder if he would squeal like a little girl if somebody beat him up? It's so easy to talk like a big macho brute, but then he's not over there going house to house with his platoon, in full body armor, in 130 degree heat!
But he does talk tough, so he must be macho. Just like his not-gay pal, W.
david @ 87:
YEP!!!..agreed.....he clearly has some mental issues.....he seems to be fixated on sucking......another closet case maybe?.....
Does his racism have anything to do with this arrogant hate spewing? "That part of the world"! There Ay-rabs and thus subhuman, not part of an elect, chosen tribe. "We coulda done Saudi Arabia, we coulda done Pakistan".
Kick in their doors and murder their civilians. Yeah, that's made Israel real popular too, hasn't it. Screw the tribalists on all side. The only tribe/race I belong to is the human race.
how do you spell misinterpretation?
uh,... I wonder if that is what they will say to us? "We will go there and 'burst their bubble'."
No, no,no, that is not possible. Only us, The Mighty United States of America can say that.
Tom my dear, this is not a good way to stop violence, which was the end goal, right? Stopping terrorism. Of course it is easy to promote tropps dying when you don;t have to put your own life on the line. Takes REAL courage.
Damn! but that boys psycho!
Tom Friedman blames the USA because the USA doesn't care enough to win?
The Iraq War has been going on now for 15 Friedman Units now.
The USA is not a winner because the USA doesn't care enough to win?
THAT'S ALL HE HAS?????
"As bad as Ann Coulter, and just as loathsome".
You beat me to the punch. Both Coulter and Friedman have hit upon a gimmick and exploited it with the niche to whom they cater: Coulter discovered she could make money by smearing gays with vile epithets,and Israeli Boy discovered that all he had to do was use analogy and metaphor, using the idiom of the average guy, and people would think he was a genius, much like Gardner in "Being There". He is so bloated and full of himself that he has no shame; To this day he still qualifies and defends his Iraq stance (that latter word has a new meaning these days).
I think that seeing this Friedman clip from 03 is extremely timely now, especially in light of Impending Iran. Unbelievable stupidity can be repeated.
If there is anyone sucking on anything at this moment, it's America.
The last line: "We hit Iraq because we could."
...is EXACTLY what I told my students in February 2002 when I asked them to tell me why we were about to go to war with Iraq.
During yesterday's street protest, I was confronted by a pamphleting racist waving the endlessly-produced flyer with the 'proof' that Islamists want to kill all of us, patiently scribed from the pages of the Holy Koran itself.
I told the fellow what is obvious, that the same sort of racist crap can be found in the Old Testament and the Torah/Talmud, and is commonly copied by THEIR racists. And then, per usual, he suggested that we need to nuke Islam, while at the same time insisting he wasn't a racist because he didn't have any prejudices about blacks.
After this hilarity, I was thinking about one of his main points, which had been that, after all, Christianity had a Reformation, and Islam hasn't, therefore we should nuke Islam to a Reformation, and it suddenly occured to me that I knew the genesis of that idea, at least it's most recent racist proponent:
Thomas L Friedman.
Yes, you see, according to Saint Thomas, the Reformation is what makes Christianity modern, nevermind that the Reformation was what made Protestantism, while leaving 1.0 Catholicism intact and unchanged. Nevermind that Martin Luther was an anti-semite who believed, and wrote, that Jews' synagogues and houses should be burned to the ground, and:
"If we wish to wash our hands of the Jews' blasphemy and not share in their guilt, we have to part company with them. They must be driven from our country" and "we must drive them out like mad dogs." -- Luther, "On the Jews and their Lies"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Jews_and_Their_Lies
Those 2.0 Reformed Christians otherwise known as NAZIS were only too happy to promote Luther's hatred as their own.
It's the Axis of Abel (or is that Cain?). Thanks, Thomas L., you and your fellow neocon racists have brought the Bomb to the infidels, and made arch-Nazi Ann Coulter's beliefs sound plausible again, with the help of your hangdog, Joe Lieberman approved, Face of Sincerity.
The real problem in the Middle East, according to Centcom Thom F, is that they don't have enough electricity to run the powerdrills, so they can cleanse and Reform themselves of the Jews and Shia with the Tools of the Lord.
One final comment on that experience, one of a great many such. As usual, once the racists involved reach the end of their denial, under steady accusation of such, and see that, indeed, they ARE racists, they suddenly leave, having outed themselves to themselves.
Prior to being told he was a racist, last night's hateful fool thought he was doing the Lord's work. I told him he was bearing false witness, and he seemed genuinely stunned.
The mirrors of protest reflect the light of truth into estranged eyes, and sometimes the haters see themselves in their hate, and flee. Like the Vietnam-era soldier who told me he had fought his guilt and shame for thirty years, until George W. ("Mfer") Bush made it safe for him to hate again.
Proof positive that Boy Wonder is an antichrist. Throw off your guilt and shame and become clean in the projection of your moral angst onto the innocent!
You can tell he's a republic; always thinking about sucking.
Does he have any relationship to AIPAC? Just asking.
What an idiot. And he keeps saying "We" but that fuckstick is the one worrying about stock options, he aint over there "fighting for our freedoms"
What a tool
That was really terrifying. What an idiot. Why does Friedman still get invited onto these shows? He's been just as wrong as Bush about every aspect of this war.
Scary sh*t.
I live in New Zealand and I can confidently say NO ONE, would be allowed to go on our mainstream media (which by the way has just as little journalistic integrity as any other country's mass media), say what this guys said, and not have some very public condemnation and/or rebuttal and/or scrutiny from media and politicians alike. Mind you we aren't the most powerful country in the world.
One day videos like this will serve as a grim reminder of how American society let evil people like this propagate their disgusting mindset masquerading as some sort of respectable analysis of important affairs. It's like watching old movies of nazis, facists, racists and warmongerers from times gone by.
Sad thing is that knowing humans, when people are looking back at this video in disgust they will probably be some current form the very thing they are looking at, yet they won't notice because they would have been brainwashed into thinking that it is respectable enough to be given coverage.
BUSH hit Iraq because they had been occupied by US and their strength was QUASHED after years of occupation and oversight.
BUSH hit Iraq because it looked easy.
E A S Y
Boy was that jackass wrong!
*ss*ole
Ya know there are a lot of bright journalists out there that would love to be in his position and would certainly come across a hell of a lot more intelligent.
What sad, silly little little man.
What a fucking dork. He talks like a badass. I wonder if he's actually that tough?
dave @ 2:
Big ups on the Seinfeld reference...maybe Friedman could be a white, poet warlord in Burma...he already speaks gibberish.
what a disgusting excuse for a man.
how late am i?
DISGUSTING.
I believe good old Tom is letting something slip here. Going door to door letting exactly who in Iraq know what. It seems to me we had only one enemy in Iraq and that was Saddam, i.e. the regime. Who exactly is Tom's vendetta with. The Iraqi people after all were victims of the same regime. Too many blow-hards on television seem to forget that the Iraqi's were not our enemies and that much of the resistance is the result of our actions. Unless Tom meant he should go door to door personally apologizing for this ill thought-out misadventure. I'm not following.
"we hit Iraq because we could"
Well, what we did was to give extremists like Bin Laden legitimacy because Iraq serves as proof of the U.S. meddling in the affairs of a Islamic country using lies about WMD in order to pursue "nation building" otherwise known as "imperialism". We accuse the Islamic extremists of "terrorism" but call our terrorism "shock 'n awe". We have accused Saddam of hording poisons, but poisoned Iraq with depleted uranium, causing a perhaps 40% rise in cancer, if memory serves me correctly? I think a great evil has been perpetrated in Iraq by this country.
Best thing for Bin Laden was this war, since it drew U.S. resources away from Afghanistan. And the President's "stay the course" assures that it'll stay that way. We're going to go nowhere with these lobbied corporate owned politicians making foreign policy.
Man oh man.......as a Canadian, of course we're your brothers-in-arms but wait a fucking moment now. In being Canadian, we are also known to be a lot more foreign policy friendly and compassionate that that gov't below the 49th P.
This type of rhetoric should NEVER be heard coming from a guy whose cultural friggin' background disfavours Arabs anyway and whose country is so assisted by the US against Arabs. It's the kind of bulklshit that gets me nearer and nearer to saying...Hey America, maybe you need another spanking just to let the arseholes know, they can be hurt.
Unfortunately, it'll be the innocent people who will pay for this peckerheads bullshit.
How he is allowed to say this is unforgiveable.
So, I guess this is when he said "suck on this"? I have dialup and I can't run You Tube. Could you put up a little transcript or quote or something?
Friedman was a propagandist for the right wing, and lately he has been hiding, trying too jump the ship of USS Bushite which is sinking and he is like the infamous Titanic males who pushed women/children aside too get a seat on the life boats, he is the lowest form of life, he helped propagandise, prosecute this war, and has blood on his hands, just as if he ordered, it, sadly he is likely too never face punishment on this earth, but surely as there is a god in heaven and jesus, on judgment day he will have too atone for his evil, he is typical of all rich men, as jesus said for them too enter heaven is as likely as a camel too pass thru the eye of a needle....the elite rich who gloried in this war, have as much chance of seeing heaven as a camel does going thru a eye of a needle, and that is their poetic justice, too spend all eternity suffering for this evil they have perpetrated on America and the civilians killed in this fiasco called Iraq War...
watu @ 112:
We LET them? How do you figure?
The corporations who own those stations 'let' these bastards on the air. We USED to have a Fairness Doctrine, which required rebuttal time, but Reagan took that out. We used to have a functional FCC, but Bushco has raped it back to the Stone Age.
We're in the middle of a coup which has been stealing the elections. That's not the fault of 'American society,' that's the fault of criminals.
And, anyhow, think back about how fairly you lot treated the Maori. Neither of our societies is all that pure.
Dear Tommy --
Wonder drugs like Viagra can't work for everyone. Perhaps you should treat your low testosterone with testosterone replacement therapies.
Or maybe you should abandon the idea of becoming a man eventually and consider estrogen treatments. It will clear your thinking and stop these testosterone-deprived rants you have become increasingly fond of going off on.
But alas, when you've failed as a man and have punished the rest of the world for it, maybe you just can't make it as a woman either.
r @ 31:
Brilliant! Seriously, though, this pseudo-intellectual gasbag is yet another reason to stop high school bullys. Tom "FU" Friedman is another wimp like Tuckie, Kristol, Rove, and all the other weenies who suffered through through childhood and are now overcompensating for their humiliations back in the day.
Tom Friedman proves once again that he's out of touch. The world is flat and so is Tom's IQ. I'd like to send Tom and all the other political and pundit chickenhawks to Iraq and see how long they could stand being where they've had the audacity to place our troops.
Fuck you, Tom.
I'm betting he's short and has no muscle tone. Most of the public warmongers from the last few years are.
Tom has earned a one-way ticket to Baghdad, green-zone not included. All he has to do is call me up, email me even, and I will pay the expedited travel costs. Don't forget to pack a toothbrush... oh, and I'll throw in a "suck on this" T-shirt, so... just pack light, m'kay?
Can we please change the Constitution to lower the age that people can run for office? These adults (people above let's say 35) are really screwing things up. The "adults" are acting like children with phrases like "suck on this" and "bring it on". Why do we allow this? Yes, there is free speech, but why do we as a nation endorse these fools who use caveman-esqe machismo and schoolyard taunts as foreign policy and electoral policy? Unfortunately people like John Mayer are right, we do have to wait on the world to change.
I just had to come back again and say what a dick this guy is. It's the first time I've ever seen him.
The Nazis did a lot of stuff, because they could.
The US supported Saddam because Saddam was able to do stuff, because he could.
This guy and people like him are no better.
Sad thing is, the US seems full of these kind of jerks.
This clown has a big lip when sitting in front of a camera.
Typical coward who can hide behind a bully and trash people.
These people where the infamous Nazi Party members.
The ones calling for the synagogues to be burnt and jews and liberals and gays and whatnot to be murdered in the concentration camps.
Edwin @ 17:
Yes, me too. Very gross, I don't want to think about that.
He's at least said one true thing, we went into Iraq because we could. And I'm sure that all the innocent civilians will take great comfort in realizing that we're "bursting the terrorists' bubbles" when they die daily in colateral damage. What a monster.
And, having attacked a country that had nothing to do with 9/11 (unlike the Saudis, it's been established that much of Al Queda's funding came from there), stomped their government flat and have the innocent people living as refuges or the next best thing to stone age, what have you done, Freidman? Shown them that you're not smart enough to attack those who attacked your country, and put up a nice convincing recruiting poster for any terrorist organization in the world. My schmuck is smarter than you.
Just another rich boy chickenhawk trying to convince himself that he has a pair.
having read "the lexus and the olive tree", "the world is flat", and "longituteds and attitudes", Im pretty sure this little snipped is taken out of context.
That said, he may have changed his tune these days. Looking for a transcript. If anyone has a link...
You ask how Friedman is "allowed a continued place on the national platform?"
Quite simple... Tommy boy is a member of the elitist Council on Foreign Relations (i.e. the people who really run things in this country).
Tommy Friedman is worth about 3 billion dollars and he is telling the Middle east that we will kick their ass anytime we wish.
Well ... I've got something Tommy can suck on - and it's not a useless macho phrase.
The criminal enterprise within U.S. government and beyond chose to "hit" Iraq because Iraq was vulnerable and rich in resources, including real estate. The "enterprise" chose to impose their Shock Doctrine on Iraq - Friedmanesque (Milton Friedman) "shock and awe" to kill and displace as many Iraqis as quickly as possible in order to take control and privatize, monetize, commodify Iraq and Iraqis. That same "shock therapy" will visit all of us if we live long enough.
If you would really like to see where Tom is coming from, here is a link. This is an entire interview, about 50 min, rather than a 15 second clip taking his thoughts completely out of context to spin him into some kind of Bush Shill.
http://www.charlierose.com/shows/2007/08/16/1/a-conversation-with-thomas...
I like this site. Makes me laugh on a regular basis. Good calls on many things. Sometimes though, disagreement with a particular person seems to be an excuse to take their comments and thoughts out of context and spin them. Apparently you people HAVE learned how to fight fire with fire, because this tactic was developed for, put into practice by, and refined by the RRR.
F**king jingoist! The world is being played like a wrestling match in the WWF by these knuckleheads.
It's official; Friedman is crazy neo-con who advocates bombing the Muslim world until they submit to America. No wonder he defended Judy Miller.
My God! This guy is a NYT liberal these days?
Boy, it's been a long time since I've been in the US, sjees.
Friedman sounds like a guy who got sand kicked in his face when he was a kid, trying to sound tough to make up for it as an "adult."
He's also essentially trying to turn the entire Middle East into our enemies, despite the fact that it was Al Qaida, and not Iraq, not the Middle East, not some amorphous mass of Muslims, who attacked us on 9/11.
Same sort of conflation the Bush administration has mastered.
Jackass.
i didn't see the whole thing. was tom saying that this was his view, or that this was the view of the administration going to iraq. by saying we hit them because we could, i didn't get the impression he was endorsing it, i took it as a metaphor for what went on, which didn't seem totally far off.
To poster "JW" ...Some of us don't have an hour to watch your clip. If you claim his statements were taking out of context, please provide some context for us and clarify his views, since you have obvious already seen the whole thing.
Friedman spewed this filth four years ago. His sick prison rape fantasy is typical of the prowar crowd. They all see the Iraqis as savages and have killed many thousands in order to satisfy their belief in white supremacy and American empire.
He is an ass hole, a racist, and an all around dick!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3800770925110269212&q=charlie+ro...
Look from 2:52 until about 5:40. I only looked for the relevant quote, I'm glad he said it early on in the interview. I could not stomach listening much longer.
[...] Tom Friedman: “Suck on this, Iraq” http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/09/13/tom-friedman-suck-on-this-iraq/ [...]
Login or Register to post comments.