You're Making An Impact--Keep It Going.
By Nicole Belle Tuesday Feb 12, 2008 12:31pmThere's a new rule on Capitol Hill: the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee can remove impeachment from the Constitution, but cannot also use telephones, Email, or fax machines, because the flood of pro-impeachment communications from outraged citizens is overwhelming each of those devices. Don't believe me? Try phoning, Emailing, or faxing John Conyers' office.
Congressman John Conyers' telephone, by many reports, rang endlessly on Monday, approximately 60 times per minute, or as fast as people could get through. The same thing appears to be happening today (Tuesday).
If you try to get through at 202-225-5126, chances are you'll hear a busy signal. Other times it will simply ring forever until a recorded voice tells you "Your party is not answering, please try your call later." Some people have had better luck by calling the Capitol Hill switchboard at 202-224-3121 or through one of the toll-free numbers that activist groups use, and asking to be connected to John Conyers' office. Others have just run into busy signals that way too.
If you are lucky, you will get through to a staffer, and by all reports they are very, very cheerful staffers glad that you called, no matter where in the country you live.
Emailing the Congressman is out, because he has stopped accepting Emails, at least at this address john.conyers@mail.house.gov. I could tell you some of his staff members' Email addresses, but then they wouldn't be able to work for a week.
Faxing the Congressman is very much in, but you have to set your fax machine to repeatedly redial until it gets through. The fax number is 202-225-0072.
You can also try these alternatives. Call Conyers' Judiciary Committee office at 202-225-3951. Or call his Detroit, Mich., office at 313-961-5670 or his Trenton, Mich., office at 734-675-4084.
If you do get through, be prepared to hear that impeachment hearings are not happening, but hearings into impeachable offenses are. Even though these non-impeachment hearings will not make it onto television, and Conyers is not even announcing them ahead of time, and even though witnesses will refuse to show up, Conyers' staffers will try to tell you that hearings of the sort they've done for the past 13 months are all that's needed.
Hmm. If that were true, would the phone be ringing the way it is?








Login or Register to post comments.
I'm finished with congress, especially on this issue.
It is abundantly clear to me that there is something wrong with our government. It is corrupt, it is not acting in the best interests of the electorate, it is not fulfilling its Constitutional duties.
Conyers? A joke. If he doesn't get it by now, then something is very, very wrong, and that's where the focus should be.
I want to know precisely what this man is afraid of. If he is being blackmailed, the he (and all other dems who have "goods" against them) need to step down, get out, and let other, cleaner people take over.
At this point, it is entering the realm of the insulting.
Really Conyers? After 8 years of this cabal, with a major scandal on a weekly basis you still have the stones to ask what needs to be brought up?
Fuck you!
If we ever see impeachment hearings, I'll take a vow of abstinence. And six weeks later, you'll read about me in the Enquirer erupting into flames due to spontaneous combustion.
It is abundantly clear to me that there is something wrong with our government. It is corrupt, it is not acting in the best interests of the electorate, it is not fulfilling its Constitutional duties.
Man, what are we gonna do? This is all so depressing.
We're impacting phone lines? How low can the bar go??
prunes @ 4:
It's what I said: Find out what they're afraid of. Expose it. Force them to get out, and move in CLEAN people who are not wallowing in the filth that this current batch of scumbags seem to be wallowing in.
I'm not depressed.
I'm fucking ANGRY.
I like that idea. Halt the business of congress, until they do the will of the people.
We need to impeach our ENTIRE government!
They're all corrupt, lying sacks of shit! People,
we need to start voting in third party candidates.
Enough of this so-called 'two party' system that
operates as one...against us.
I think at this point we need to forget about impeachment and start on War Crimes prosecution. I don't think there is a statute of limitations, if we lay the groundwork now, and don't let go, eventually we will have a favorable political environment to prosecute.
Strawberrybitch @ 3:
It doesn't take much for a redhead to spontaneously combust...I know..I date one! LOL!
Sorry, couldnt' resist, strawberry! LOL!
John @ 9:
Thats also a very good idea.
Impeach, Indite, convict, imprison, execute!
Also, a lot of it has to do with lobbyists.
They have WAY too much influence over
politicians.
Lollimom @ 1:
I'm not sure but I've heard the phrases "photographic negatives" and "farm animals" bandied about.
i love the activism, it is awesome...
but, in my normal contrarian way, i wonder why scads of calls, emails, faxes and the such is going to change conyers 'do-nothing-about-presidential-crimes' mindset. its not like conyers isn't fully aware of what bush has done, of people's intense passion around this issue. he knows. he has just decided, or been told, to do nothing.
it wreaks of partisanship. instead of doing what is best for america he, and the nancy pelsosis of the world, worry that any action against bush will hurt dems chance in 08. first off, that is a big assumption to make. secondly, hello, this is the REASON we have congresss, as a check on executive power. conyers, until he stops stonewalling, is failing america.
Lollimom @ 1:
Sadly, it's not even blackmail.
Conyers is on cspan as we write. They are on the FISA bill.
Liberal AND Proud @ 10:
No problem, L&P. There IS something inherently messed up with Redheads, our GIVE A F**K Factor knob is permanently stuck at 11.
Please also give Henry a call:
Valerie Plame is talking about Sibel Edmonds
Henry Waxman is grilling a baseball player, Roger Clemens, about steriods while refusing to grill the state department about reported TREASON in the state department (Sibel Edmonds: Reported in London Times)
Please call him and let his office know that you find that “the war on steriods” should take a back seat to investigating TREASON involving the sale of nuclear secrets. Sibel Edmonds, featured on CBS 60 Minutes, names names and is very credible.
http://www.henrywaxman.house.gov/contact.htm
In Washington, D.C.
2204 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-3976 (phone)
(202) 225-4099 (fax)
In Los Angeles
8436 West Third Street, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90048
(323) 651-1040 (phone)
(818) 878-7400 (phone)
(310) 652-3095 (phone)
Stop the buying this delusion of any "impact".
Nah. Gon. Hah.
If we had a true free press in control of a mass media..
The nightmare of the last 7 years would NEVER have happened.
The US media is complicit in these crimes.
The relationship between the CIA, corporate media and corporate billionaires
..has resulted in the demise.
But the people are fighting back... The crimes of BUSH and CHENEY is NOT an acceptable precedent.
And neither is ANY firm that supplied war materials to Sadaam Hussein.
Or any presidential candidate that served on the board of any of those firms.
Dana @ 8:
You mean you don't "believe" in "hope" and "change"? What kind of racist, war mongering hater are you?
Johnny2Bad @ 21:
I believe in hope and change but I believe that we have to do it. No super heroes . . . just us.
Sounds good. And if you can't get through to Conyer's office, why not call some republican Senator's offices and ask them if they would be kind enough to deliver a message to Conyers, requesting that he hurry up with impeachment proceedings?
Start with McCain, 202.224.2235, or mccain.senate.gov/contact.
Phone calls, emails, faxes to Conyers?
Here's a faster, easier, less-painful way to arrive at the same result:
Jot down on a piece of paper everything Bush has done to merit impeachment.
Carefully fold the paper and place it in your shirt pocket.
Run head-first into the nearest brick wall.
Robert Wexler hit is goal and more... 227,167
http://wexlerwantshearings.com/
Bob Dylan is playing songs relating to the government
and impeachment on his radio show today.
Go Bob(s)
Avid Reader @ 18:
thanks for that avid reader!!!
i am insanely pissed off that something as inconsequential as steroid use in big boy games is MORE important than treason in the congress and in the msm...
why bother reporting this?
don't pop a boner just because the lines are freakin' busy for chrissakes. it doesn't mean you get to fuck Cheney. you, me, all of us are the ones that are going to get fucked again.
pardon my language please.
Relatedly, the House looks like it will actually stand up and play chicken with Bush over FISA/PAA. They will be voting on a 21-day extension (that Bush says he'll veto) in less than an hour. If you've got a Blue Dog in the House, call him or her now. As in, stop reading and start dialing. Maybe mention Donna Edwards, as that could help convince said Blue Dog to sit up, instead of roll over.
Samson- @ 26:
Ask Waxman if he knows about Misprision of Treason
Sibel Edmonds is trying her best to follow the law.
Why isn't he? Did he at least forward her allegations to the appropriate authorities?
If not, why shouldn't HE be charged with misprision of treason?
United States Code, Title 18
Part I - CRIMES
Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
§ 2382. MISPRISION OF TREASON
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
People keep saying that the dems don't have a backbone - but it's not true - they have a very strong spine and they continue to use it AGAINST the will of the people. There is a frightening article in the SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE no less about the powers this president has and how the gov't , with no-bid contracts, are building prisons all over the country - who are these prisons for?
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/04/ED5OUPQJ7.DTL
Why is the gov't buying trains with shackles, undisclosed prisons and the like? Remember - people don't look at Hitler and ask why didn't the German Parliament stop him - they ask why didn't the German people stop him.
Let us not be judged similarly. Writing letters to congress and being "nice" isn't working any more. What are we going to do people?
If we elect a new president, what permanent change in the trajectory of where this country is going can ever happen if the crimes of the Bush regime are not brought out in the public square, exposed, investigated, and justice is done? If the new “progressive” candidate promises change in areas of health care, the economy, and tax breaks, all of which may prove beneficial to the average American temporarily, what REAL and LASTING change will occur in this country and the world as the U.S. Government continues the same program: bombing Iraq, bombing Pakistan, goes on to bomb Iran, continues to spy on Americans, New Orleans remains a disaster area, detainees continue to be tortured, and the whole program set in place by the Bush regime is solidified and made permanent? It is critical to fully understand that without an absolute repudiation of the crimes of the Bush regime that the program and agenda of the last thirty years of influence by neo-con, corporatist, theocratic, and war mongering elitists these groups will continue to have over-reaching power in this country.
I got through no problem. Left a cordial message encouraging Conyers to do his job. But really...if he doesn't get by now he's an imbecile; otherwise, he's just putting up a facade for "his base".
I left a message saying that if he doesn't start impeachment proceedings by December, it's only fair that he be the one, and the only one, to stay in Washington over Christmas break.
I'm sure Conyers telecom buddies have put in all the unlisted phone lines that he and his cronies in Congress need.
I mean...we can't have the "work of the privileg...oops, I mean people" disrupted by such nonsense as grassroots issues raised by the great unwashed.
Petro @ 15:
I can tell you right now: He's lying. Everything in his body language, and his condescending remarks tell me he's lying.
That man needs to go.
Thanks for the clip. Very telling.
I called Representative Conyers off @202-225-5126 this afternoon and yesterday afternoon to let him and them know my opposition to granting immunity to the telecom companies and in favor of impeachment of both the President and vice-President. I had no problem talking to a member of his staff. It seems that they are getting many, many calls in favor of impeachment and against immunity. In regard to immunity I do not understand why we are giving immunity. It goes against our Constitution, in particular Article I, Section 9 section 3 No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed. Also mentioned again in Section 10. We Democrats must fight for our liberal/progressive principals. We must fight for the platform of the modern Democratic Party.
"..if we started an impeachment hearing that didn't succeed...they would say that [Cheney? Bush?] is being demonized...they would take that right into the election of 2008..."
So he got elected in order to ...? .... stay elected?
Useless hack.
below is my fax...before I sent it and comments?
Thanks
As a tax payer, I am ashamed at the behavior my elected officials have displayed regarding Impeachment hearings with this administration. If you take history in to account, and with in the last century has shown, Impeachment is the PEOPLES only form of holding elective officials accountable and not just wait until another election year turns the corner.
If what has been placed in your committee’s plate does not display all the signs of impeachment and allow the people to not be heard, what is YOUR version on what IS an Impeachable offense? Between the open statements of lies and signing statements; to the cover up’s in the emails to the politicization of government agencies to the justice department firings and so many more we don’t know…, what is Impeachment?
Congressman Conyers, for future generations to have elected officials that displace behavior that may fall under the Articles of Impeachment Clause with out being checked will only show that if one is having a marital affair THAT IS AN IMPEACHABLE act, and not covering up lies, politicization and taking one into a war based on deceptions.
You being the Chairman and an elective official will not be around when history writes that under your leadership that people’s house turned a blind eye to defend the United States Constitution.
Lollimom @ 34:
My pleasure. I appreciate your take on it...
lock them all up today and arrange a fair trial. the charge: unamerican activities.
I got through on both numbers though it took awhile. They were kinda defensive. Didn''t want to take a position either way and then put me through to a comment line.
The corporations and the billioinaires are closing ranks and pushing us toward facism. No one stood to oppose Hitler, thus far no one will oppose this movement either. I'm not sure what to do.
So I called and got right through - I told the Gentleman that answered the phone why I was calling and he said please hold and transferred me to a comment line. I commented and that was nice.
Impeach President Bush Congressman Conyers it's time to get it back on the table - If you don't as a matter of law and justice this country will never regain the integrity we once held.
John @ 9:
Exactly. Then he can't pardon himself either. Yay!!
Ladies and Gentlemen,
If you want something done on impeachment, trust me, call your OWN Member of Congress and Senator, especially those who sit on the Judiciary Committee. Rep. Conyers, etal is not going to pay attention to people who are not from his/her district or even from his state. Sorry, but that is the reality.
And, many of you are complaining about the backbone of the Democrats -- where is the backbone of the electorate?? There is NO WAY that this country is willing or ready for another impeachment travesty. So, please move on and vote in November -- not just for the President but for you city, local, state and federal officials.
They may be able to ignore emails and faxes and calls.... but they couldn't ignore 30,000 people marching up the hill to demand impeachment from the guy.
We need to start a People's Resolution to Impeach Congress and we need to deliver it to every Congressman, news outlet, blog and house hold. The only way you're going to get these people to listen to you is if you slap them in the face with a codfish. They're not listening because they're more afraid of George W. Bush than they are of us. Perhaps rightfully so, since all we can do is get irritated and note vote for them whereas George W. Bush can have them all declared terrorists and have them shipped off to a CIA black sight to be tortured.
We put them in office and they know that our only other choice is Republicans and they know we're not going to vote that way. So they think they have an easy win on their hands. The only way to get them to do their damned jobs is to make them realize you'll vote 3rd party before you vote for them if they're just going to sit there and let the nation burn.
"Your party is not answering"
INDEED.
Wow --- your "Leaders" in action.
Battered spouse syndrome at its finest here folks.
Maria @ 43:
We're not talking about impeaching somebody because they got a blow job and lied about it. THAT was an impeachment travesty. We're talking about a President who ignores Congress, lies to Congress and the American people, kidnaps and tortures people, wipes his butt with the Constitution, willfully and knowingly breaks the law and orders others to do it too.
If there were EVER a reason for impeachment, George W. Bush is it.
If you think lying to Congress about an affair is on par with lying to them about your justification for a war that's killed almost a million innocent people and spent over half a trillion dollars then there's something seriously fucking wrong with you.
E in Md @ 47:
I'm not comparing Bush's America to Nazi Germany but I fear that history will. We must stop the bleeding now! Our republic is in the ICU barely hanging on.
People's lack of appetite for the truth is truly stunning.
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0911-28.htm
Ed in MD -- you're right we are not talking about a blow job, but there is NO WAY we are going to impeach Bush. What I am trying to get across is that you are wasting your time being angry at Rep. Conyers, etal. Trust me, he wants to impeach Bush, but he does not have the support of Congress. Please remember that the Democrats have a pretty good majority in the House, but the Democrats in the Senate do not. You can't get a toilet paper bill passed in the Senate without 60 votes!! That is why is if you want to accomplish something and make a statement, vote in November and make the United States Senate Democratic majority more solid.
Do you really honestly think that this country is ready for another impeachment?? No.
I always hear, we need to do this, we need to do that, but I never see anyone actually DO anything. There are so many like-minded people out there who would be a powerful force if only one person would come up with a plan and get it started.
Where I live a small group of us are fighting corruption on the local level and making a difference. No one up till now has bothered and local officials have been doing as they please. We have them shaking over possible (upcoming but they don't know yet) investigations and all of a sudden they are doing their jobs properly. Gotta start somewhere, and I don't plan on stopping here. If 5 people can shake up a local government, it can infect all the way up with the numbers we have willing and wanting to see change in this country.
Spoke to a Conyers staffer for about 16 minutes. He said impeachment would never happen. Not a chance. Due to lack of time, lack of support (Lieberman and friends) and lack of resources. They are severely out lawyered by the Whitehouse. Conyers is a stickler to due process. Which is much slower than the speed of crime. Said that Bush may fall in the legal system post presidency than firmed that there was no way that would ever happen either.
We discussed some of the woes and challenges in picking up many, many moderate republicans. He also confirmed the office outage from the flood of impeachment voices. Says their work is being severely hampered as a result.
They seem to recognize the “Undermining of every agency” by Bush Inc. Though says Conyers is going to use the AG scandal route to go after Bush’s misdeeds. Touted the resignation of several Justice Dept. officials. This Conyers staffer was polite, open and very sure of himself. I hope I get him again tomorrow. Again, he said no impeachment.
With respect and kindness to all.
Maria @ 51:
ummm, yes... i do.
but, really, that is a bad way to view this issue. does that really matter what people are ready for? impeachment needs to happen when the president uses his office to the detriment of the country and the constitution. it has nothing to do to with polls, or public opinion. laws were broken, and people must be held accountable.
the notion that our goal should be to increase the democratic majority in congress instead of holding people accountable for their heinous crimes smacks of petty partisanship and is just another reason why many refuse to join the democratic party.
put the country first, not the party.
Ladies & Gentlemen
Please move along now there is nothing more to see here.
Over the last 4 years all the screams to Impeach these criminals has not been heard nor will they ever heard by this congress.
Phone calls..blah blah blah. Faxes..blah blah blah. E-mail..blah blah blah. After doing all this I have to ask. Has your voice be heard?
Most would answer no. For Christ sake they want you to e-mail them they want you to call there offices because they can simply ingnore the message.
But:
300,000 folks marching on Washington DC screaming IMPEACH BUSH would do the job and quite nicley I might add.
They can not and will not ingnore that.
So what are you going to do?
Yes. By all means. Call, write, email Conyers. The same with Clinton. Feinstein. Pelosi. etc. etc.
It won't do a damn thing.
The Democrat political establishment has determined that impeachment by the voters is the only impeachment they'll accept.
George Bush could murder someone on videotape and the Democrats would tell you "it isn't in the people's interests" to pursue a criminal sanction against Der President.
>Impeachment needs to happen when the president uses his office to the detriment of the country and the constitution. it has nothing to do to with polls, or public opinion. laws were broken, and people must be held accountable.
Thank you!
There is another VERY important reason --- to the rest of the world, and for future generations, not impeaching is tacit approval of everything these
weasels have done.
After being a lifelong Liberal Democrat, I am now a complete cynic in regard to anything of substance being done by the Party to reel in the current criminal Administration. I will still vote Democrat in the election because I know the Republicans are far worse liars, criminals, and sociopaths. There is no hope for real change until the Democratic Party is purged of RINOs, the DLC Bluedog pack of corporate whores. Do not waste time debating their defenders on this board or anywhere else. They are immune to reality and facts, and feeding the trolls only encourages them.
Squash them in the next round of Democratic primaries.
robbie @ 56:
He already has. Many many times over.
... and:
If Impeachment proceedings are not done advanced this year, the entire section on Impeachment should be removed from the Constitution.
Hey! What about Pelosi's fax, phone & emails? And Emanuel... and all the "Blue Dregs" who vote Repug?
Maria @ 51:
Yes, as a matter of fact I do and I believe that it is in fact the sworn duty of Congress to impeach him.
And if the Democrats had any guts what so ever they'd take that slim majority and cram it down the Republicans throats. The Republicans are able to pulls off the shit they pull off because they stick together. They threaten a filibuster and the Dems cower and back off. They call the Dems soft on terror and the Dems go hide under their beds. The most recent example would be the FISA bill. The right thing to do would have been to strip any immunity provisions from the Bill. Yet the amendment still failed with quite a few Dems voting to kill it.
They need to decide who they serve. If they do indeed serve us, then they need to get on their feet and start cleaning house. No more of this bullshit looking into steroids in baseball. Start filing subpoenas for Bushies and if they don't show up go send someone to arrest them at their houses or jobs. And if Mukasey and his lackies won't do it, then start first with a special prosecutor and put Mukasey on trial...
and if any of this doesn't work, filibuster and vote down every bill that comes through Congress that Republicans want. Vote down every amendment and earmark. Paralyze the government.
All they need to do in order to do this is stick together and start leaning on the RINOS instead of cowering every time someone says 'Boo'
They work for US, not George W. Bush and not the Republicans in the Senate, not Blackwater and not the telecoms, and the only reason they still have their cushy Congressional seats is because WE put them there.
hug the moon @ 53:
If that's the case then we might as well remove the impeachment provisions from the Constitution with an amendment and have Congress officially declare that the President is completely and in every way immune to the law and that he is in fact the supreme law of the land and then just disband the Congress entirely
If we're going to turn America into a fascist dictatorship with that fucking reject Bush at the helm then we might as well just do it. Because if we're too damned cowardly to fight for our rights and freedoms then we don't deserve to have them.
All Hail Emperor Bush!
Samson- @ 54:
Samson- @ 54:
put the country first, not the party.
Here here!
Checkur6 @ 55:
Yeah that's what I'm talking about.
I called and spoke with a human after 100 rings
E in Md @ 65:
Do these 300,000 carry pitchforks and torches? 150,000 US troops can not take Baghdad, with the ull mite of the US military and most of our tax dollars behind them. How will 300,000 people holding spray painted bedsheets going to take out the establishment? At least it will serve as an historical marker.
Maybe a national strike would be better.
WHAT FREAKING DIFFERENCE WILL IT MAKE? Bush is in office less than another year, time enough to do whatever damage he wants. Even if he is impeached, he can stall around long enough to finish his term and light out for the Paraguay Ranch. The impeachment is about 6 years overdue. At this point, Bush & Co. simply do not give a damn. Martial law can still be declared. The Halliburton-built prison camps are in-place. (They Exist! Check on it!) Face it...we're stuck with this asshole until January. And if we are really lucky, Obama will manage to get a few good things accomplished before he is either hamstrung by some manufactured "scandal" like the Lewinsky Affair, or until the dirtbags who are REALLY running this country, the Cheneys and Scaifes and their ilk, arrange for some Iranian Nutcase to assasinate him so they can go on with their war profiteering. .
Make that an International strike.
Again, I am only saying maybe. I do not pretend to have an answer.
I know being negative won't help, but, this CONgress has known this crap for almost 8 years. They haven't done ANYTHING up to now, and they won't. Before the Iraq invasion, millions and millions the world over marched in protest. Did that work? Nope.
hug the moon @ 69:
An international strike? European nations have national strikes fairly often, why would they need to have to help Americans get their shit together?
hug the moon @ 67:
Maybe.
If one looks at the history of the United States the only time in its history that changes,real changes have been made was when the people protested. I look back at the Vietnam War protest and if it weren`t for those we would still be fighting that war also.
There is strength in numbers. Look at our congress today that proves the point.
Tyler Durden @ 71:
Good point. Still the more the merrier. Maybe we can get Paraguay to join in. A national strike then. When? Is anybody out there?
> WHAT FREAKING DIFFERENCE WILL IT MAKE?
Because it's not about removing Bush or Cheney from office. Have NO illusion: an impeachment investigation will result in NO charges and even if it does a trial will result in acquittal.
Full stop.
I support impeachment not because it will have the effect of removing Bush from office. Nor I do I support it because I think it will advantage or disadvantage either political party.
I support it because I consider it to be constitutionally mandated. It is illegal, as far as I'm concerned, not to pursue an investigation wherever it leads when this much evidence of wrongdoing is lying thick on the ground.
You find a dead body in the Oval Office, you conduct an investigation. It does not matter if the president is popular and has so much congressional support that you can never hope to effectively prosecute him for murder. You investigate anyway and let history judge those who would acquit in full light of the facts and not based on spinuendo.
I also support an investigation because choosing not to investigate gives tacit and direct approval of the manner in which Bush and Cheney have conducted themselves. It says that the only disagreement between the administration and the congress is on matters of the politics of foreign and domestic policy. It says that there is no credible evidence of any real wrongdoing on anyone's part.
And it gives full permission to the next president...and the president after that...and the president after that...to do everything Bush has done. If they ever get called on it, they can say 'hey, you didn't even bother to investigate BUSH for this stuff...why am I so special?'
We owe it to history and to what integrity of good government we have left. Counting votes and dissecting internal party dynamics have no place in this conversation. That's what the regular order of business is for.
LOL
Ever noticed when there is talk of really doing something the room becomes empty.
ConcernedCanuck @ 70:
so true.
i live in philly and we had tens of thousands of peeps walking down market st and around independence mall protesting the notion of illegally invading iraq. the result: nothing. unless you were in center city when this was going down you heard nothing of it.
and, imho, the biggest reason why these protests and marches were so ineffective was due to the fact the msm barely covered them, if at all. what happens when millions of people come together to try to make a statement and the media, which supposedly (don't laugh) is supposed to cover the news, ignores and belittles a mass movement?
the corporate owned and controlled msm wanted this travesty. they needed this crime. and no matter how many people came together they wouldn't give honest coverage of the popular will.
now, does that mean we shouldn't protest, be activists, speak out, demand change, etc.? no, it does not. but we shouldn't fool ourselves thinking that the corporate establishment is going to willingly let our voices be heard.
Two words: Police. State.
Whether we impeach the bastards is not the point . . it is the process of impeachment that will bring the sewage into the sunlight.
There are plans to turn this country into more of a police state than it already is. We have to start pushing back. We have to put our bodies between the criminals and the constitution of the United States of America.
My country, 'tis of Thee,
Sweet Land of Liberty
Of thee I sing;
Land where my fathers died,
Land of the pilgrims' pride,
From every mountain side
Let Freedom ring.
I have a question:
Does impeachment really have to come from congress? Or is there anything that citizens can do to get it started? In my native country any citizen can file for impeachment, just as long as they can find one Representative to endorse it. What are the laws about this in the US?
reyvn @ 79:
In this country it comes from Congress. If it comes from the citizenry it's called a coup or revolution and Bush has already covered his ass on that with the Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007
reyvn @ 79:
Its been tried and apparently nothing works. We simply have to sit idly by and watch the continued destruction. You see Nancy Pelosi is a shrew.
Checkur6 @ 72:
... if you think that the vietnam war ended because a bunch of hippie kids were burning their enlistment cards. I have a neat bridge to sell you, near prime real estate in NY.
The only time this country had enacted real changes is because of taxes and tax-related issues.
Checkur6 @ 55:
Millions of people were on the streets prior to the war, that did wonders. Didn't it?
And during the 2000 inauguration thousands were on the streets protesting. Wow, that really worked, did it?
they don't give a rat's ass, no matter how loud the rats scream. If anything they may get their rocks off on doing whatever the hell they want as that makes us scream lauder.
capnmike @ 68:
Even if you put national ideals, honor, and all the blood that has been spilled in order to secure the freedoms we currently hold for granted aside. There's one very simple reason, because if we let this asshole go then the next asshole will be worse and he or she will be using the illegal and unprecedented powers that Bushco has grabbed for itself. They will point to Bush's time and say "Hey, you let him get away with it... Now there's legal precedent so I can do what I want."
That's not the nation I want to live in. That's not the nation I want my child to live in.
That's the bottom line. If he walks then we might as well fold up shop, burn the Constitution and surrender to our new Masters.
I tried to email Pelosi today and it was sent back to me several times with this message Delivery to the following recipients failed.
AmericanVoices@mail.house.gov
They don't want to hear from the American citizen because they all have guilty consciences. This is one reason they are going after the internet. Years ago the elected officials could do almost anything and nobody ever knew cause it took a lot of time and trouble to find out what they were up to. Now it takes seconds to read and see how they are operating.
E in MD, etal
In order for you to make a difference you need to call, write, email, protest, etc., etc. your own Member of Congress and Senator because you are voting for them. I think it is easy for people to criticize Members of Congress and Senators for the lack of work or backbone etc., that you seem to believe they do or have. I am not saying what you've said is not right, but please do not refute the truth and the reality. The Clinton impeachment was a fiasco and it divided this country in ways that we still see til this day and probably will continue to see for years to come. We cannot afford another impeachment no matter how legitimate the reasons are -- and most Members of Congress and Senator realize that - including Mr. Conyers. The Bush administration has been awful, but the majority of the people voted for him and his policies including a Republican House and Senate which was elected in 1994. As much as I would love to see things change overnight, it cannot realistically be done. People need to keep themselves informed on the issues and unfortunately you cannot rely on the press or the blogs. Look up your Member's or Senator's voting record, how he or she stands on the issues, etc. - there is a lot of misinformation out there. And, we have seen what a beautiful job the mainstream press has done.
Trust me when I say that in order for you to make a difference, you have to write, email, fax and call your own representatives. Tell your family and friends to do the same - they do listen. Voting is the most important right that we have in this country, and not enough people do it on a consistent basis and we have the perfect example of what happens when you don't vote -- George Bush, etal
Tyler Durden @ 83:
Thousands are a hell of a lot different than millions.
But if that's the way you feel, then why bother to stay in the US? You could head to Sweden and enjoy real freedom. Not the bullshit Freedom® they try to convince you that you have here.
E in Md @ 87:
Actually, I was thinking Netherlands.
I just called the number and I actually got through but I had no idea what to say so I just hung up. I just figured I wouldn't get through and wanted to see. Pretty stupid of me. Oh well maybe I'll figure out what I want to say and try back again later.
I sent Rep. Conyers a long missive yesterday. I don't understand why it is taboo for these elected officials to uphold and do their duty to the Constitution. He needs to get off of his ass and do the right thing. Risk himself, if he is being blackmailed or threatened (why the fuck else do they think it's called "service"?).
90+% of the entire lot needs to be unseated. Their acts of complacency, ommission, abdication and dereliction and their acceptance of the intolerable and abominable - at every critical juncture, have made them so complicit with the criminals that they have become effective co-conspirators in the crimes that have been committed against the People, the Constitution and the World.
Yes, the strategy of scapegoating Conyers and Pelosi continues.
By the end of March, you will have succeeded -- not in getting impeachment to the floor (that requires applying the scapegoating power TO REPUBLICANS) -- but in making sure that no such process will be possible this year at all.
Congratulations. You have once again chosen the easy path.
Tyler Durden @ 2:
How many Republicans have you told this to?
Oh wait! How much political work have you ever done, anyhow?
(dialtone)
Scapegoating you can handle. Political work? Go fish.
Attacking Conyers for the lack of Republican votes for impeachment is beautiful. And once you've done it enough, you can then put him into the category of your enemy -- at which point you can freaking forget about any help from him all year.
It's a beautiful strategy. Alienate the Progressives -- blame them for everything.
Not that 'Tyler Durden' cares. His whole game is made up of cussing out one of the most loyal Congressmen in history. It's a very easy task, being Tyler. Not quite so easy to be John Conyers, because you actually have to deal with the opposition, instead of attacking the loyal in the wonderful vacuum of leftist conspiracy.
Mark @ 7:
Yes, block the Congress! Give Bushco as much help as possible.
Dana @ 8:
Yes, you need to impeach the entire government.
When will you be doing that?
Liberal AND Proud @ 33:
Post your evidence. No evidence? Why am I not shocked.
Top Contributors to John Conyers Jr. (D)
During the 2006 Election Cycle
American Assn for Justice $ 11,000
Baron & Budd $ 10,500
Operating Engineers Union $ 10,000
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen $ 10,000
UNITE HERE $ 10,000
American Resort Development Assn $ 10,000
Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $ 10,000
National Cable & Telecommunications Assn $ 10,000
Clear Channel Communications $ 10,000
Sheet Metal Workers Union $ 10,000
United Auto Workers $ 10,000
Amgen Inc $ 10,000
Credit Union National Assn $ 10,000
Yes, he took money from cable television and Clear Channel. He's the enemy!
Drag him through the streets.
Paul in LA @ 91:
Everybody sing!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm a cyber troll and I'm okay,
I troll all night and I flame all day.
He's a cyber troll and he's okay,
He trolls all night and he flames all day.
I set my sites, on a friendly folk,
I know they all hate me
On forums I go trolling
And catch some pawns for tea
He sets his sites, on friendly folk
He knows they all hate he.
On forums he goes trolling
And catches pawns for tea
He's a cyber troll, and he's okay,
He trolls all night and he flames all day.
I wreck their threads, give them the hump
I laugh as sites turn sour.
I put on my disguises,
And screw around for hours.
He wrecks their threads, gives them the hump
He laughs as sites turn sour
He puts on his disguises
And screws around for hours
He's a cyber troll, and he's okay,
He trolls all night and he flames all day.
I break down threads, I rant and rave,
Got twelve identities
And no one knows my gender
Or knows just who I be
He breaks down threads he rants and raves
Got twelve identities
And no one knows his gender
Or knows just who he be
He's a cyber troll, and he's OKAAAAAAAAAAYYY.
He trolls all night and he flames all day
Paul in LA @ 94:
Hey, did you write this one? Troll man
I had no problem contacting Conyers office at 202 225-5126. The young lady, who answered, stated that Conyers believes that impeachment would be a waste of time. She transfered me to a vent line and I vented.
"Conyers believes that impeachment would be a waste of time."
Oh I would have said, oh then Conyers is actually in our government is a waste of time, too.
Time to impeach Conyers, too.
THROW ALL THE BUMS OUT!
M @ 98:
would be a waste of time.
There ya go. Total disregard for the laws of this country.
JTM @ 28:
Oh, well. A combination of Blue Dogs and people who can't stomach the PAA voted down the extension. This opens the door for the House to pass the Senate's bill.
Now back to feeding the troll.
Sorry to interrupt.
Maria @ 86:
Respectfully, I've been looking at this issue in depth since the 04 election and trust me I understand what you're trying to say. I'm no Constitutional scholar nor am I a lawyer. But I do know how to read and I am an American citizen who loves his country not just in name or for show like all the nationalists on TV ranting about how Liberals are traitors. I don't care if the Clinton impeachment divided the country. I am unwilling and unable to bet my future and the future of my child on whether or not the next President that comes up the pipe will be another George W. Bush, be better or be much much worse.
Congress swore an oath and they swear it again each time they are rel-elected. So does the military. The President and Vice President and basically all elected FedGov people do as well. In that oath they swear to Protect and defend the US Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic
There is no bigger enemy of the US Constitution right now, than George W. Bush. As American citizens it is our duty and our responsibility to oppose tyranny here in this country. Our country would not even have been founded if the old King of England had not been doing the exact same things as George W. Bush is doing - right now-. Do we want to sit around and wait until he begins performing mass arrests and executions of his detractors?
The bottom line is, he violated the law when he ordered the NSA to violate FISA. FISA Specifically says that war or peace time doesn't matter. He's also committed fraud on the United States by using the yellowcake memo to convince Congress to vote for the Iraq war. FISA violations are a felony. Defrauding the US is also a felony. He also violated the Constitution on his own authority when he suspended habeas corpus without an invasion or rebellion in place.
If he cannot even obey the very document that gives him his power then he does not belong in that office. He is a tyrant and it doesn't matter whether or not removing him will divide the country. It is the right thing to do. If the Democrats in power are too fearful for their cushy jobs or to worried that they will somehow look bad then they do not deserve to hold office either. '
and if not now, then when exactly? What line needs to be crossed in order to secure an impeachment? Does George W. Bush have to walk up and shoot Al Gore in the face on live television and piss on his corpse before the House will finally move? He's already made it clear via statute that he and he alone decides who is a terrorist and who is not and that the Judiciary has no authority to contradict him. He's already declared that he can seize our assets and belongings ( by executive order ) on his own merit just by declaring you a terrorist. He's already used legal trickery to put suspected terrorists out of reach of the law so he can kidnap and torture them even though the laws against torture have been on the books a long time. He's already taken it upon himself to ignore the First Amendment by putting detractors in Free Speech Zones and Fourth Amendment by stating he can eavesdrop or search any one any where. The Fifth amendment has been rendered pointless if you can be tortured into testifying against yourself. The Sixth amendment is now moot, as there have been people held without formal charges or trials since immediately after 9/11. That's over seven years now. The Eighth amendment has already been tossed out the window if you can be subjected to torture.
So essentially in 8 years of office he's effective tossed all but the 2nd and 3rd amendments out the window. No referendum. No Constitutional Amendment. No vote. You're willing to just accept that?
I'm not trying to be nasty or anything but when is enough enough? When it's you that's been declared a terrorist and has been whisked off to the Salt Pit?
I'm with you, E in Md, but have to add one thing. Given that it's the duty of all Fed officials to uphold and protect the Constitution, and given that it is easily argued that things being done in both houses are direct attacks on, for example, the Fourth Amendment, which is part of the Constitution, we are left with only the Judiciary as having clean hands. But they can't start anything. That's why we're stuck.
Check and balances only work when only one branch is going haywire. When two or more lose their way at the same time, our system has no reset button.
M @ 98:
Which is not only hearsay, but it is the opinion of a staffer who answers the phones. And it is an abbreviated speech on the issue, for sure.
Conyers' day has been spent trying (succeeding) in blocking the Senate FISA bill from being approved by the House. He's also trying to finally get the contempt bill passed.
Scapegoating him for a supposed comment by a staffer is EXACTLY what you need to do, because apparently FISA was only important yesterday -- today it is not worth any activism against the Blue Dogs who nearly settled the FISA issue for Rockefeller.
You drop the ball, pay no attention to the actual politics of the moment, do no work against the Republicans and Blue Dogs, and then try to beat Conyers for what some low-end staff may have said. It's beautiful.
JTM @ 103:
Then how do you account for the 200 REPUBLICANS who are busy rubberstamping every policy of Bush's?
You don't. You ignore that, and try to pin the saint's cross on anyone who has some blood left.
Paul in LA:
What are you saying? That the Democratic party leadership is unwilling to perform their constitutionally mandated duty unless they get permission from the Republicans?
If I want to vote for a Republican, I'll vote for a Republican. In the meantime, I expect the congressfolk who I VOTE FOR (and I voted for Pelosi) to do their jobs and not whine about anticipated obstruction.
This isn't scapegoating. This is asking for what we were promised. The Republicans never promised me anything and I never voted for them.
And yes, I know, we need better Democrats and more of them. I agree. We all also need daily blow jobs and magical life-restoring ice cream sundaes.
But until the universe delivers, we can whine or we can stand up for what's right.
What's right is right and that trumps party shenanigans. Lay the record bare and let history judge us fairly. Bury it behind "pragmatic" capitulation and let history make up their host of conspiracy theories.
You think THIS is scapegoating? You just wait until history has its turn.
"Oh, the scapegoating of Chamberlain continues I see. Have you directed any of your criticism at Hitler? HE'S the real problem! And what about the Reichstag? So long as they have any power, Chamberlain can't do anything!"
E in Md @ 102:
Great. Conyers has been 'looking at this issue in depth' since '72, when he worked on Nixon's impeachment. By '04 he had already published a book with 25 major felonies proven. By '04 impeachment had already been worked on for two years solid, from the minority, in broom closets.
This is a coup. When you figure that out, two Canucks and some cat in Maryland will not be the dividing line of history, I guarantee you.
JasonS @ 106:
That the Republican party leadership is unwilling to perform their constitutionally mandated duty unless they get permission from Bush.
"Emailing the Congressman is out, because he has stopped accepting Emails, at least at this address john.conyers@mail.house.gov."
why. hmm is it because he doesn't want to hear the truth anymore? conyers = gigantic pussy
shitt romney @ 109:
You are a huge dick for saying so.
Paul in LA @ 108:
No argument. As far as I'm concerned, the Republican party is for all practical purposes an organized crime organization.
Now. What are we to think of leaders who respond to their obstruction by not even getting the facts on the record?
History will show no resistance on the part of the Republicans to impeachment. No down vote. Nothing. Because the issue is not coming up.
Every Republican can claim that THEY PERSONALLY would have supported an investigation (if for no other reason than to clear the president's name.) Every Republican can point to the Democrats and say "hey, THEY were in charge! Why are you talking to ME?"
And every Republican can say "hey, we may have stepped over the line in impeaching Clinton, but we thought we were right and we proceeded anyway knowing we wouldn't convict because we actually care about law and order and not just winning elections."
And they'll be lying, sure. But plausibly because our party's leadership has given them that out.
I expect more from the people I vote FOR than from the people I vote AGAINST. If that's 'scapegoating,' well, then that's scapegoating I guess.
prunes @ 4:
Extremely frustrating is more like it. The "people" no longer have any type of control over the agencies that are supposed to represent us. The neocons stand in front of everybody and like the bully on the school ground, tell us to piss off since there's nothing we can do about it. We can scream, we can rant, we can cry, but the people issuing the orders can arrest us (now as terrorist sponsors), detain us, fine us, and ruin our lives. Age doesn't matter, race doesn't matter, political affiliations don't seem to matter.
"Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world." -- Archimedes
So what lever and what fulcrum can we use? It's hard to see one, when the neocons seem to control everything we could try and use. Voting? Do you trust the machines? Protesting? Has anybody seen any real numbers about protests on the main stream news? For that matter, has anybody seen any unbiased news? (I always assumed.. silly me.. that news was to report on the facts, not the interpretation of the facts.) How about using force to remove the control of the neocons? Hmmm... do you feel like being treated as a terrorist? Or for that matter, do you think you have a chance against Blackwater and all their toys? What lever? What fulcrum?
Well... there is an interesting tool we have at our disposal. We use it every day. It is extremely powerful. So powerful that we fear to even really consider using it. Figured it out yet? Ya... money.
Now before you turn away and insist we have to have it and can't afford to risk everything we've got, ask yourself how much you've lost since this nightmare began? Are you worth what you were back in 2000? Has your mental and living condition improved or declined. As a species, we tend to be poor at comparing the present with the past. We have selective memories and are influenced heavily by the media.
So let us see what we can do with our money.
1) Remove it from the investment system. IF you are in such a place as to have a savings and IF you are is such a place as to have investments, you can shake the foundation of the system. Let's see... if 50% of the pissed off people withdrew their money, what would happen to those big top heavy companies? That is a LOT of capital and it is (for the most part) financing the buggers that are promoting the neocons.
2) Change what you spend it on. How about buying food from a local farmer? (If you can find one anymore.) How about telling the cable company that you are canceling your subscription until FOX is removed from the package? News is still online so your browsing habits will start to influence those news outlets. How about using Open Source software and operating systems that reflect your values instead of pouring money into companies that are trying to undermined your wallet? Why spend so much on software?
3) Change your travel habits. Car pool. Go electric. Ride a bike. Telecommute. Throw neighborhood parties. Throw building parties.
4) Turn off the TV!!! You'll save on the power bill, and more importantly start to communicate. The culture we live in has been isolated to the point that we don't feel we have any power. Television is an extremely effective way to isolate people so they do NOT talk to each other. The primary purpose of the television system is to spoon feed the masses and desensitize them to the changes that the neocons are driving towards.
5) Get rid of your credit cards. This is the other side of the investment and savings coin. Those who don't have savings are generally living in debt. As the debts get deeper, the more of your money goes towards rewarding the management. Credit cards are a sucker bet just like lotteries. If you are into stress and risk taking, I'd suggest nude bungee jumping would be a more responsible past time. Not that I'd try it ;)
All this to say that if we can see beyond our fears of being without money, we can change the system.
Wars aren't about equality and helping. They are about making money.
Banks aren't about saving for the future. They are about making money.
Oil companies aren't about energizing the world for growth. They are about making money.
Investing money isn't about producing something beneficial to all. It's about making money.
Money is the carrot, and we are all a bunch of mules.
Strangely enough, $5 at a time into a cookie jar will do a much better job of changing the world.
Good luck all!
Au contraire, mon frere! The Judiciary Committee has a webpage and I just went to the Contact link and clicked it, then typed in my comments and it works. This is what I stated:
" There is a very real and perverse possibility that the NFL will face tougher sanctions for spying on practice squads and covering it up than the telecoms and this President will face for spying on the citizenry and lying about it."
Quote from Balloonjuice.
Please tell me that the Judiciary Committee will take action on investigating the current administration for committing impeachable offenses. Thank you!
Here's the link:
http://judiciary.house.gov/Contact.aspx
BigD @ 112:
WOW! Now this is revolutionary thinking. This is a real RESISTANCE MOVEMENT!
Samson- @ 76:
Maybe we need to have the protests on the doorsteps of the media outlets.
capnmike @ 68:
ANd if we're really unlucky, Bush will have some of his minions raise the terror alert level to 'Buy Duct Tape' because of a 'Gut Feeling', suspend the elections indefinitely and declare martial law because of an 'insurrection'.
Paul in LA @ 105:
What the hell are you talking about? I blame them just as much for the current debacle as I do the Dems for letting it happen. The Democrats deserve to be booted out on their asses. The Republicans deserve PRISON TIME.
Paul in LA @ 107:
So you're saying we should just sit back... buy some duct tape and saran wrap and hope to hell that we get to stay out of the torturers hands long enough to spend that economic stimulus check and hope that Bush will leave office voluntarily. That's bullshit.
Hooray for Conyers. At least he's not like that asshole Kucinich who was using impeachment as a campaign trick only to peter off when he knew he wasn't going to win.
But Conyers could be on every damned talk show, radio program, news paper and blog presenting evidence and convincing the American people that impeachment is their only option to secure their rights. Instead he's doing broomcloset shit and making the Democrats look even more weak and ineffectual than they already are.
If not now, then when? After Bush has already retired to his Paraguayan estate?
JasonS @ 111:
Fine. So when you attack the loyal Democrats because they aren't upholding their oath of office, get a clue about the oath of office's current status, which is basically defunct as long as half the Congress refuses to accept that duty.
E in MD @ 118:
I have never suggested any such thing. What I am suggesting is that righteously attacking loyal Representatives without noting the context is NOT support. It is not constructive.
The attempt to hammer the loyal into taking up our cause is not support, and does not work. The lack of respect shown here daily PROVES that it is not a mood of support, though many claim that if someone takes a step they like they will support them. How easy to say! But then it's immediately "What have you done for me lately?"
Support is LONG-SUFFERING. I don't see that virtue much in evidence.
Look, Conyers sold out Shirley Chisolm in the Congressional Black Caucus in the 70's...this is not a surprise. He is party first, truth and justice....uh...I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and say, second.
What to do? Support every independent / third party candidate you can. Local, state, federal - it doesn't matter. You can start with getting rid of JC's "boss", Nancy Pelosi. Throw some bones to Cindy Sheehan.
I do not understand what Conyers is thinking since he lead the charge against Nixon and seemingly was ripe for impeachments a few years back.
Either they have something up their sleeves to do after a new congress is seated or they are being blackmailed in some way.
It's the only answer that makes sense to this clearly illogical action.
Conyers knows only impeachment hearings give them the power to force testimony and he knows the administration won't respond to anything less.
http://www.kickinggas.org
Do you find yourself constantly writing angry blog posts, but nothing ever changes? Do you find the current politicians out-of-touch from the daily hardships you endure? Do you feel powerless or out of control?
Well now you can take back control of your life! And no the answer is not to vote for candidate X or take some expensive drugs!
Stop depending on these ineffective "representatives", and get involved in your own community. Turn off that mainstream-media, turn on and turn up the independent media. Start disrupting life as usual, tear down that propaganda you hate, ask those heavy questions, tell that biggot at work that he's being racist. Get involved in the local activism, your community is probably full of like minded people, and there's probably plenty of problems that need solving.
These politicians dont represent us, so lets not let them ruin our lives.
Stuart Bedasso @ 121:
Conyers and Chisolm worked together for years, and put forward the MLK Jr. birthday holiday together.
Bringing up some 30 year old conflict between political cohorts without mentioning the positive side of their association is just character assassination. Any rightwinger can do exactly the same thing and be exactly as asinine.
And I think you have your story backward
"Not long afterward she voted for Hale Boggs, who was white, over John Conyers, who was black, for majority leader.
"Boggs rewarded her with a place on the prized Education and Labor Committee and she was its third ranking member when she left."
geo @ 122:
Sure, if you don't count the lack of votes in the Senate for conviction, the whole world is like a dream.
Stuart Bedasso @ 121:
Which will put DLC Steny Hoyer into the Speaker's seat.
You're going backwards.
I hate to say it but the militia is looking like the best option. God I never thought I would be saying this. Where do I sign up?
Login or Register to post comments.