Thanks Conneticut!

A duel? Ugh...I do NOT want to see or even HEAR about those two touching the tips of their johnsons together and making fencing noises.

[drowns brain in brown liquor to chase away the visual]

Hey if we just decimate every country that hates Israel then it's better than giving them money right? Maybe Joe is actually on to something here...

Can someone call me when the last tree in the Amazon is cut down?

"Traitor Joe"...that's perfect. Although I'll never be able to shop a Trader Joe's the same way ever again.

ShouldBeWorking @ 5:

Hey if we just decimate every country that hates Israel then it's better than giving them money right? Maybe Joe is actually on to something here...

It's not that people hate Israel. They don't like the sociopath jerks they elect to office. Just like people don't hate the U.S.A. They hate Bush and his motley wrecking crew of misfits and corporate pirates.

It's always a small clique of "elite" jerks who ruin what would otherwise be a perfectly happy life for the people of this world.

It's going to be a fine day when the Dems grab a substantial majority in the Senate and holy Joe loses his committee seats! har!

"Basset Hound"

Ha!!11 I c wut u did thar.

Are the Joe Lieberman dartboards available for mass-market distribution yet? Link, please.

sorry for posting here but i couldn't find an open thread without 250 entries already there.

OPEN NOTE TO RIGHT WING POSTERS: If Mccain does happen to win as the most recent poll would suggest since he has now pulled even with Obama after being 13 points down as recently as a few months ago, then you have earned 4 more years of McSame. Never forget his little ditty, "Bomb, Bomb, Bomb Iran." Do you think he was joking or that he misspoke when he indicated another hundred years of Iraq occupation and war. that was no joke nor was it a misstatement. if he wins, you deserve him and a continuation of the bush policies. and don't be mistaken, it won't be the poor or minorities fighting over there, it will be you and your children and your grandchildren. Oh yes, lest you forget, ante up some of your tax benefits to pay off the national debt which now numbers in the trillions. congratulations, this is truly YOUR COUNTRY.

Chico Hussein @ 20:

Joe's a warmongering Republican, he may be giving a speech at a warmongering Republican convention.

What's the problem again ?

Americans are lazy, and obviously are gluttons for punishment.

I think this thing started with Lieberman back in 2004. He got mad when the democrats resoundingly defeated his bid for the nomination. Al Gore refused to endorse him and endorsed Howard Dean instead. Then in his senate bid he was defeated in the primary. Democrats did not elect Lieberman in Conn., Republicans did. He knows where his loyalties lie these days.

How many ways can Holy Joe come up with to tell the Repugs at this year's convention that, "You're f**ked."

damn, i always seem to forget something that comes to mind the second i hit the post button. again to the right wingers out there, can you enlighten the rest of us as to the purpose of this "war' or occupation or annihilation or whatever you choose to call it. And tell me once again, what constitutes victory, since you're all so concerned about winning (sounds like a pride thing to me). Are we there because they perpetrated 911, no. are we there to dispose of sadam and his sons, they're gone and believe it or not many of the iraqui people say it was better under their regime as opposed to the american occupation, or is the goal to give them democracy as bush would have us believe. well ask the people once again, would they choose "democracy" or a riddance of the occupation tomorrow? Without having ever been there and talked with them, i still can surmise what their answer would be. or are we fighting them there so that we won't have to deal with them here. pretty weak argument. they have never been stronger than they are right now. what caused their growth. you red state man and your support of a dictator's policies (and i'm not talking sadam) had a hand in all of this.

and the effin' DNC, friggin' wake up dean(!!!!), allows this fool and dangerous goon to retain his chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committees.

the dems are their own worst enemy

Samson- @ 29:

and the effin' DNC, friggin' wake up dean(!!!!), allows this fool and dangerous goon to retain his chairmanship of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs committees.

the dems are their own worst enemy

Deans one of them don't kid yourself. He's not going to start eating corn burgers and corn fries he's going do what he has to to hang on to his wealth.

I wonder if he’ll challenge Tweety to a duel afterwards? Keith Olbermann and Howard Fineman discuss the political metamorphosis of Holy Joe.

What metamorphosis? Leiberman has always been a cockroach, it's just that now the media can't put a (D) in front of his name so they can use him a a foil, we see him now just as he has always been.

no longer a proud american @ 27:

damn, i always seem to forget something that comes to mind the second i hit the post button. again to the right wingers out there, can you enlighten the rest of us as to the purpose of this "war' or occupation or annihilation or whatever you choose to call it. And tell me once again, what constitutes victory, since you're all so concerned about winning (sounds like a pride thing to me). Are we there because they perpetrated 911, no. are we there to dispose of sadam and his sons, they're gone and believe it or not many of the iraqui people say it was better under their regime as opposed to the american occupation, or is the goal to give them democracy as bush would have us believe. well ask the people once again, would they choose "democracy" or a riddance of the occupation tomorrow? Without having ever been there and talked with them, i still can surmise what their answer would be. or are we fighting them there so that we won't have to deal with them here. pretty weak argument. they have never been stronger than they are right now. what caused their growth. you red state man and your support of a dictator's policies (and i'm not talking sadam) had a hand in all of this.

I'll tell you what a substantial number of Americans think we are doing in Iraq. This came from my brother-in-law, who is not a right winger, not even a Republican and otherwise, an intelligent person:

"We are fighting radical Islamic extremism in Iraq. They hit us on 9/11 and they'll do it again."

Chico Hussein @ 34:

L.A. Confidential @ 26:

ysbaddaden @ 25:

How many ways can Holy Joe come up with to tell the Repugs at this year's convention that, "You're f**ked."

I think you mean the Neocon Party. There is no Republican Party anymore.

Much to the chagrin of, well, Republicans !

Bullshit. I know hundreds of Republicans. I have never heard ONE of them complain about the neocon usurpation of their party. They just don't give a shit. They're largely a bunch of unprincipled cowardly chickenhawks. As long as the gravy train keeps rolling in for them, they're fine with the neocon crowd. And the racists and fundies too.

solid @ 35:

no longer a proud american @ 27:

damn, i always seem to forget something that comes to mind the second i hit the post button. again to the right wingers out there, can you enlighten the rest of us as to the purpose of this "war' or occupation or annihilation or whatever you choose to call it. And tell me once again, what constitutes victory, since you're all so concerned about winning (sounds like a pride thing to me). Are we there because they perpetrated 911, no. are we there to dispose of sadam and his sons, they're gone and believe it or not many of the iraqui people say it was better under their regime as opposed to the american occupation, or is the goal to give them democracy as bush would have us believe. well ask the people once again, would they choose "democracy" or a riddance of the occupation tomorrow? Without having ever been there and talked with them, i still can surmise what their answer would be. or are we fighting them there so that we won't have to deal with them here. pretty weak argument. they have never been stronger than they are right now. what caused their growth. you red state man and your support of a dictator's policies (and i'm not talking sadam) had a hand in all of this.

I'll tell you what a substantial number of Americans think we are doing in Iraq. This came from my brother-in-law, who is not a right winger, not even a Republican and otherwise, an intelligent person:

"We are fighting radical Islamic extremism in Iraq. They hit us on 9/11 and they'll do it again."

So, has your brother-in-law ENLISTED ?

Have YOU ?

L.A. Confidential @ 40:

Chico Hussein @ 38:

RON PAUL

He hasn't been offered a pulpit in the national cathedral of the American consciousness -- television.

The influence of the vast wasteland known as TEEVEE is dwindling fatser than Rush Limbaugh. Thanks to blogs like this and many others, network TV and cable news will go the way of the Home & Garden Channel of RFTV.

Smarmy.

He's always reminded me of Polonius.

Chico Hussein @ 39:

solid @ 35:

no longer a proud american @ 27:

damn, i always seem to forget something that comes to mind the second i hit the post button. again to the right wingers out there, can you enlighten the rest of us as to the purpose of this "war' or occupation or annihilation or whatever you choose to call it. And tell me once again, what constitutes victory, since you're all so concerned about winning (sounds like a pride thing to me). Are we there because they perpetrated 911, no. are we there to dispose of sadam and his sons, they're gone and believe it or not many of the iraqui people say it was better under their regime as opposed to the american occupation, or is the goal to give them democracy as bush would have us believe. well ask the people once again, would they choose "democracy" or a riddance of the occupation tomorrow? Without having ever been there and talked with them, i still can surmise what their answer would be. or are we fighting them there so that we won't have to deal with them here. pretty weak argument. they have never been stronger than they are right now. what caused their growth. you red state man and your support of a dictator's policies (and i'm not talking sadam) had a hand in all of this.

I'll tell you what a substantial number of Americans think we are doing in Iraq. This came from my brother-in-law, who is not a right winger, not even a Republican and otherwise, an intelligent person:

"We are fighting radical Islamic extremism in Iraq. They hit us on 9/11 and they'll do it again."

So, has your brother-in-law ENLISTED ?

Have YOU ?

I have never agreed with this illegal occupation of Iraq, so no, I won't be enlisting, although unfortunately about half of my federal tax bill goes to the war machine. My brother-in-law made it a point to let me know this is an ALL-VOLUNTEER army, so sounds like to me he won't be enlisting either, but for different reasons (more of the chickenhawk variety).

chris @ 44:

Barak should get Joe on his ticket as a VP to give him some national security clout.........

I don't think so....much prefer Wesley Clark if it's got to be a military type.

.

Finemen thinks LIARman is "bitter" at the Dems...?

Oh, so ...
Blame the Dems for berating LIARman for saddling up to Bush...?
Blame the Dems for being pissed at Joe's insistence that the president is right... war must go on...?
Blame the Dems for attempting to elect a person of character...?
Blame the Dems for... ?

Go ahead PAID PUNDITS... Blame the "other guy" for "your guy's" inability to have a moral center, his failure to faithfully represent the wishes of the people he claims to represent, his uncanny ability to morph into a NeoCon elitist...

.

slippy hussein toad @ 30:

Joe isn't a traitor. He's just a whore.

And a cheap one at that.

So Senator Lieberman’s bitterness bowled him over to dissing the Democratic Party and embracing the Republicans? He politics on being independent and going where his conscious leads, seams like he goes where his self-interest best provides for him. This guy should write politics all about me 101. I would like to see a Democratic majority in the Senate that does not need this profiteer and he is dropped like a hot potato. I read the pro Israel stuff on him too and that does not sit well. Is he reaping funds from pro I Israel sources. Has he ever been taken to task for this? To think this guy could have been President Gore’s and our Vice President! What an opportunist!

Anais @ 8:

Oh, you Connecticut Democrats! How COULD you choose this party traitor over Ned Lamont? What were you THINKING?

They didn't choose Lieberman. Lamont won the primary.

solid @ 56:

Joementum @ 55:

Anais @ 8:

Oh, you Connecticut Democrats! How COULD you choose this party traitor over Ned Lamont? What were you THINKING?

They didn't choose Lieberman. Lamont won the primary.

You're technically right, but I'm curious to know how many Democrats DID cross over to vote for Loserman. we know plenty of Repukes did.

Too many, for sure. And you're right about the Repukes -- the national GOP threw its own candidate under the bus to back Holy Joe. That alone should have been a clue to CT voters.

Geo @ 58:

When is he up for re-election? It's time to put Traitor Joe's out of business.

2012. :(

solid @ 52:

Embittered-Max-Hussein-1 @ 50:

nony @ 48:

Lieberman is you next Vice President whether you vote for it or not.

AIPAC won't rest until they install one of their own at the top.

Lieberman will be the "acting president" of the United States.

It's a done deal.

I called it months ago...

McTORTURE/LIARman '08

.

Woah. That's the ticket from Hell. Could be as bad as Bush/Cheney, or dare I say even worse? Man, that's saying something!

Well, the only differences are 1) McCain will have senility as an excuse for his faux pas' and 2) although Lieberman will also be sucking bodily fluids from his victims, ala Dick Cheney, he won't be sucking them from their throats.

I hope he's bitter! He should be tarred and feathered!

Chico Hussein @ 64:

solid @ 45:

Chico Hussein @ 39:

solid @ 35:

So, has your brother-in-law ENLISTED ?

Have YOU ?

I have never agreed with this illegal occupation of Iraq, so no, I won't be enlisting, although unfortunately about half of my federal tax bill goes to the war machine. My brother-in-law made it a point to let me know this is an ALL-VOLUNTEER army, so sounds like to me he won't be enlisting either, but for different reasons (more of the chickenhawk variety).

So then you DON'T agree with your brother-in-law's view of the war ?

If not, then I apologize.

If so, then what the heck are you talking about ?

He's not saying anything. His mind is on cruise control, simply spewing talking points and not really believing in or knowing anything. But to be fair to him, that makes him just a typical 'Merican.

Sen. Joe Lieberman (A)

yakfitguy @ 60:

I'm no anti-semite, so don't take this the wrong way, but there is a nasty group of right-wing Jews in this country, boosted by their evangelical christian buddies like Rev. Hayden, who would do anything for Israel, no matter what the cost to us or anyone else. The "Pray for Armageddon" crowd.

Sadly, they don't even speak for most Israelis who want peace, not more settlements and war.

They are called Zionists. They don't want peace. Why would they? They would have to give up their desire to annex the west bank and Gaza. They would lose much (if not all) of the US tax dollars handed over to them. Their economy would collapse without the US tax dollars proping it up.

Come to the dark side, Joe.

Ahhh yes , Elmer Fudd , nothing that weasel says or does surprises me anymore , friggin traitor .

yakfitguy @ 60:

I'm no anti-semite, so don't take this the wrong way, but there is a nasty group of right-wing Jews in this country, boosted by their evangelical christian buddies like Rev. Hayden, who would do anything for Israel, no matter what the cost to us or anyone else. The "Pray for Armageddon" crowd.

Sadly, they don't even speak for most Israelis who want peace, not more settlements and war.

Lieberman is their spokesman and he's being used. Yep, he's that dumb.

its not hayden its hagee a fat little turd evangelico pud!

Nancy Pelosi keep touting that they have done much since they have majority, but all they have done is pick up after baby George Bush mess. Seem like the best solution is to send Baby George to the day care center and out of the White House.

Calling Joe "the party left me" Lieberman a traitor is making him more important than he is.
Zell Miller? At least he had some spunk. Lieberman's hangdog schtick ought to be embarrassing even to his supporters since he's virtually admitted that his only chance at relevance is to suck up to power.

The irony in all this is that he could have been vice president.

yakfitguy @ 60:

I'm no anti-semite, so don't take this the wrong way, but there is a nasty group of right-wing Jews in this country, boosted by their evangelical christian buddies like Rev. Hayden, who would do anything for Israel, no matter what the cost to us or anyone else. The "Pray for Armageddon" crowd.

Sadly, they don't even speak for most Israelis who want peace, not more settlements and war.

Lieberman is their spokesman and he's being used. Yep, he's that dumb.

What is sad is that you had to preface your remarks with, "I'm no anti-semite, so don't take this the wrong way." You'll never see anyone preface there statements about Muslims, Catholics or any other ideological political groups in America

Stupid Git @ 70:

Liberal AND Proud @ 65:

Chico Hussein @ 64:

solid @ 45:

So then you DON'T agree with your brother-in-law's view of the war ?

If not, then I apologize.

If so, then what the heck are you talking about ?

He's not saying anything. His mind is on cruise control, simply spewing talking points and not really believing in or knowing anything. But to be fair to him, that makes him just a typical 'Merican.

Actually, it's pretty clear from his words that this person you are trashing was just pointing out the opinion of a relative - one which he obviously disagrees with. Stop attacking someone who is in agreement that the war is horrible. You're too damn trigger-happy and are going off on fellow anti-war person.

I'm a little late getting back to this, but thanks Stupid Git. I totally disagree with the opinion of my brother-in-law, I was just trying to give an example of how the constant media propaganda has deceived a large portion of the U.S. population concerning Iraq.