'Enemy of the State' mimics the FISA fight
If you haven't seen the 1998 Tony Scott/Will Smith movie "Enemy of the State," you should. It's eerily reminiscent of what's been happening over the FISA bill trying to being ramrodded down our throats by Bush and Congress. I'm not a conspiracy guy, but there's something much deeper and far more sinister at work here than just the amnesty being proposed for the Telecoms. Check it out again and let me know what you think.
As the movie opens, the legislature is close to passing legislation to expand surveillance powers of law enforcement agencies. Republican Congressman Phil Hammersly (Jason Robards, uncredited) is trying to stop the bill because he believes it is an invasion of privacy, while Thomas Reynolds (Jon Voight), is trying to push the bill through to advance his career.
You can fill in the actors with real life characters from today....
UPDATE: I'm helping Glenn Greenwald to raise money against Steny Hoyer and the rest of the crew that are caving on FISA.
It is now definitively clear that House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer is the driving force behind a bill -- written by GOP Sen. Kit Bond -- to vest the President with vast new warrantless eavesdropping powers and to vest lawbreaking telecoms with amnesty...read on
And sign the ACLU petition: Tell Congress to Reject a Sham Spying "Compromise"
Yeah, but it is easy to predict the scenario under which a country would piss away its freedoms, it is the frog on boiling water scenario. I remember similar stories as a kid in the 60's and 70's.
stupid selfish citizens elect stupid selfish politicians...george carlin
we can end all the bullshit in four easy steps
1. pull ALL our troops back to the US
2. cut off ALL foreign aid
3. imprison bush and cheney
4. apologize to the world and invite them to join us to curb population growth, end climate change, and feed everyone
Is sad to say that history always repeats itself.
marko @ 2:
C'mon man be serious, how are you gonna imprison Bush and Cheney ????
When I used to work in intelligence, we used to laugh our asses off over this film. The Hollywood exaggeration of satellite technology was way over the top.
Yeah..this is a lost movie of the 90's that is actually one of Will Smith's better movie. I watched it a few months ago and it is surprising how relevant it is today.
P.D. @ 3:
Not an exact repeat, more like a rhyme.
Why do lefties always feel it necessary preface so many statements with "I'm not a conspiracy guy, but..."? Conspiracy is the American way of doing business...just look at Enron, WorldCom, KBR, Blackwater, Ameriquest, Countrywide, the Carlyle Group, etc. etc. etc.
Asking us to watch a Tony Scott movie is asking an awful lot!
I enjoyed "Enema of the State" more - especially after the all you can eat buffet at the El Gordo...
The Exotic Chico Hussein Escuela @ 4:
me and about a million of my close friends could march to washington and demand them in cuffs, put them on a plane to the netherlands, convict them before the entire world, then sentence them in the US!!!
Just watch the smearing of Barak on the Situation Room. He had the balls to defend the Supreme Courts ruling, and now Mccain and his fellow Repugs are sceaming about how weak he is on terrorism. Didn't these fools learn anything from their losses in 2006? Remember when Bush was going to all the Red States acting like a maniac telling everyone a vote for a Democrat spelled doom? Holy Crap!
The birthday of Voights character is 9-11-40.
9-11.
no joke.
coincidence?
BDM @ 8:
It seems that anytime I suggest to some folks that people will commit crimes for large sums of cash, I'm called a conspiracy nut.
We live in a strange world.
The media has successfully brainwashed the masses to believe in some very strange and contradictory ideas, and to believe that these ideas are normal and rational.
They have successfully convince the general public, that no politician would ever sell us out for money. Further, they've convinced the public that should a few bad apples exist, they'd never work together to screw us.
I know people that believe that our war in Iraq is illegal and wrong, but that it is also noble and waged for good reasons. That all the principals involved, had the purest of motives.
I see irreconcilable contradictions in this view.
There are times, when I feel very alone.
Another great flick that is quite pertinent to these times is The Siege with Denzel Washington and Annette Benning. But, yes, Enemy of the State was GREAT!
when people say 'i'm not a conspiracy theorist' i always think, 'well, why not"?
wouldn't you want to rule out scenario's no matter how absurd? in fact, wouldn't you want to rule them out first, since they are so absurd?
NOBODY has managed to do that in regards to 9/11.
if you still believe what the gov't tells you, you have much bigger problems then being a 'conspiracy guy'.
in this day and age, it is our duty as citizens to question everything these known liars say. everything.
Obamamite @ 16:
The idea that 19 people conspired to fly airplanes into the World Trade Center and other buildings, is by definition, a conspiracy theory.
I think we can start a list:
1. Network
2. The Manchurian Candidate
3. Enemy Of The State
4. Airplane (flown lately?)
Hopefully we can keep the Terminator movies off this list.
Oh, I forgot:
5. Bob Roberts
Fran Taylor @ 19:
AWESOME movie.
Fran Taylor @ 19:
6. War Inc.
7. Recount
8. Lions for Lambs
I remember watching this movie. I thought it was very well done. I should pick it up again sometime. :o
Those are current commentary. We're talking about prescient movies.
you don't have to be a Conspiracy Guy to see why the Bush administration wants you to know they're watching you - so you'll be afraid to speak up.
I own that movie. I bought it because i thought it was about me. ;)
Like it anyway.
Fran Taylor @ 23:
ok, nevermind.
I'm not that big of a movie buff, so I'll just bow out now.
9a. Seven Days In May (the original)
9b. Seven Days In May (the remake)
Fran Taylor @ 23:
How about Dr Strangelove?
You gotta check out "Network". Your head will spin so fast, you'll think it's gonna come right off.
HAHAA, lol.
They do look into our houses with xrays. I know it, no evidence, only online harrassment.
They get messages to me about things that I should only know, things I do in private in my townhouse. Believe it. They have actually cracked my mind now real good, but I am strong. Stronger than most. That is why they do this to me.
It sucks growing up in a town that has NSA headquarters in it. I really want to go to Canada, I give up. They can have the USA, I don't want it anymore. 25 month waiting period to get in tho. So I may just be stuck going to California, Oregon, Washington, 10th district of OHIO. I just don't know. I am so convinced that if I actually do go to Canada they will still watch me. I feel in my flesh under my bicept a rice shape hard lump, wonder what that shit is, I wonder why I get pulled over by the state police constantly. I wonder if i will ever be able to go out in public again. Will they let me work???? Are they going to set me up and put me in prison somehow soon??? None of you will know, only me. If I do come out and say anything more, I am sure I am doomed. I wish they would tell me where to go, I don't want to be imprisoned.
I am screwd, for talking out and being too inteligent. I love this let the jerkwads read this and they will say. Yea right in America, ur crazy, what have you been smoking, are you retarded. It is cool go ahead, yea I am looney, I deserve only to be locked in prison because i am infact a criminal, I am not american, only born here, I don't belong. I can't mesh with the rough men that run this place. If you could just shoot me now, or soon, please stop playing with me, just end it with my death. I don't want to go to prison and believe me that is the last place you want me. I don't do anything wrong. I work eat and sleep. You can set me up by twisting the facts at this moment in my life but I will get out, when I do, you will be sorry.
Dr Strangelove?
Oh please let's put that one on the "someday" list along with the Terminators.
It really galls me to hear or read about someone characterizing thoughts or beliefs of the obvious as "conspiracy theories". Many are, granted. But many more are based on a confluence of facts and "smoking guns" that are undeniable. Yes, there is more than meets the eye with this issue. Just as there is with everything relating to this administration. Black is white and white is black. Virtually everything is a lie and we know it. There have been so many lies and manipulations of fact that we rarely even roll our eyes any longer. That in itself is probably part of the plan. If nothing else, BushCo has opened my eyes to the staggering potential for abuse and corruption that is embedded within the office of the president. Until now, I never thought a single man, or two, could do to this country and it's system of law what these two have been able to do. And without consequence for them and justice for the American people, these methods will become implanted in future administrations as precedent. We can not allow this to happen.
BDM @ 8:
Lefties who want to be regarded as Serious People avoid challenging the "Official Scenario" of seminal events, e.g. JFK & RFK assassinations, 9/11.
The Nation magazine has been obfuscating the Kennedy assassination for decades. Max Holland is a flat-out liar.
Was JFK shot in the back of the neck, as per the Official Scenario?
No, the bullet holes in his clothes are about 3 inches below his neck.
http://subversivehistory.com
http://www.occamsrazorjfk.net
Pointing out the obvious in JFK/RFK/9-11 is a practice Serious People of all political persuasions disdain and seek to marginalize.
Meanwhile, the FBI still hasn't charged "Usama bin Laden" with the crimes of 9/11, not that any Democratic strategist would use this fact in rebuttal of the Bush/McCain pimping a phony "War on Terror."
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/laden.htm
On 9/11 the American air defense system failed to intercept 3 planes subsequently flown into buildings.
Why did this failure occur?
Why isn't this question part of our political discourse?
BDM @ 8:
It's conditioning, which - if you think about it - is irrational, since all crimes committed by two or more people begin with a conspiracy, all individually committed crimes (except for some crimes of passion and some crimes committed by the insane) begin with criminal intent, which is a conspiracy of one.
Network!!!!
Fran Taylor @ 31:
Oh please let's put that one on the "someday" list along with the Terminators.
I just thought I'd crack a little joke with that one. : )
Here's an excuse to put your tin-foil hat on.
If you remember the scene where they hack the NSA mainframe to discover the identity of the official who was responsible for the murder of the senator who was blocking the domestic surveillance legislation, they showed his profile page in a close-up.
His date of birth was 9/11.
Coincidence? (probably) But, it's a significant one, at least.
Take your tin-foil off and pick up your rosary beads. WAS GOD SENDING US A MESSAGE FROM THE PAST?
Either way, the indisputable facts are these: Bush and Co. are crooks, liars, and murderers. They are not just "enemies of the state" they are terrorists who should be tried for thier crimes.
If you ask me, Nancy Pelosi played it perfect. By taking impeachment off the table, it opens the opportunity for Bush and Co. to be tried for murder at the state and county level by any prosecutor who has a soldier who died in Iraq.
There is no statute of limitations on murder, and the evidence to convict is already a matter of public record. Just watch Vincent Bulliosi make his case at Democracy Now:
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/6/13/citing_iraq_war_renowned_attorney_...
Obamamite @ 16:
How can people believe
athese liars?It is strange in this day and age to hear or read someone say they "are not a conspiracy guy".
The implication, of course, is that omg! wtf! conspiracies are for nutcases!
For some reason, the thought process never goes to the obvious: that conspiracies do exist, and they have existed throughout history.
Et tu, Brute? A famous victim of a conspiracy.
There was a conspiracy to keep Love Canal silent in the 70s. Not a made up one, not pretend, but rather a very real conspiracy.
Watergate was likewise a conspiracy... need I go on?
To couch terms which apply to actual, real life events, is to show yourself as the victim of the conditioning that those who would most likely institute conspiracies have instituted successfully to greater and lesser degrees throughout the last few decades.
In this way, it is much like following the crowd, and calling
The Downing Street Minutes
(which, again, revealed an actual conspiracy)
a memo.
The lack of intellectual curiousity, and cowardice in exploring ideas has done more to help destroy our Democracy than any other single thing I can think of.
Is it just me or does it look like John Amato is back with a vengeance?
Fran Taylor @ 18:
terminator 2 also has a subliminal for 9-11.
during the semi-truck/motorcycle chase scene in the LA aquaduct. The Low bridge says warning 9'11"
what are the odds?
Unlike the Theory of Evolution which has observable evidence the Theories of Conspiracy take snippetts of all the facts (because many facts are unknown) and attempt to come to a conclusion that can not be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. They raise more questions than they answer and it becomes an exponential never ending search for answers. While i have no doubt the official facts about the JFK Assasination are not true i doubt we will ever know the facts. Plausable possibilities include, but are not limited to: The MOB, Castro, The CIA, The Bush Crime Family, The Soviet Union, and on and on.
I have other things to do.
HEY! I was just an extra in Tony Scott's 2009 remake of "The Taking of Pelham 123" coming out next summer. I had no idea who this guy was until This link, thanks guys!!!!!
If you see a big red haired dude walking up some subway stairs while Travolta (the bad guy) walks down, THAT IS ME!!!!!
At least the guy was a credible director!!!!
I have that movie in my collection... Have watched it a number of times over the years. It's a good thriller/political statement movie. I always have liked both Will Smith and Gene Hackman, still do, and yea, it's weird how the fact that this movie was made in 98, yet seems more and more relevant as the years go by and the Bush administration trudges on and on doing what they do.... Yea, given what's been happening in this country under Bush/Cheney, the questions posed in this thread leadin is something I have indeed wondered about over time.. I noted someone upthread said 'they' worked in intelligence and used to laugh about the intelligence technology being over the top.... I won't take issue with what this person says about the actual state of survellience technology in the 90's other than to say.. yes, that might have been true...in the 90s.... which ain't 2008.... technology doesn't stand still and once a new widgit is invented or an existing widgit is improved upon... Then pressure to justify financially the new widgit or the improvement of existing widgit usually comes to bare .........JD
xoites defends Constitution @ 42:
oh, just like DNA samples are just snippets in a regular crime investigation?
or fingerprints are but snippets?
If you will consider....
the standard for beginning an investigation is NOT BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT - in a grand jury - the standard is even less than beyond reasonable doubt. The standard to begin a investigation is a reasonable suspicion.
I've come to recognize that any fact that is unpleasant to believe in, is considered a conspiracy theory.
We've become a culture that evaluates the facts and data, not by observation, experimentation or other forms of verification, but instead, by whether it pleases us to believe in it.
And Pete, you nailed it. It is a complete lack of curiosity. And why do we need to know anything about anything? If you can push numbers on a microwave keypad, then you can cook. If you can turn a steering wheel, you can drive a car. Who needs to know how or why these things work?
But notice that when reality bites back, the public is quick to embrace conspiracy theories to explain their world, and to help them to choose scapegoats. And so the reason gasoline prices are high is because environmental whackos have prevented the oil industry from doing what they want. Suddenly it is chic to see powerful shadowy secret societies everywhere.
I told my dad recently that much of the world's problems can be explained by short sightedness and greed. He called me a conspiracy theorist. I'm still trying to wrap my head around this one.
Conspiracy is two or more to commit an illegal act or a legal act in an illegal manner with an overt act needed in furtherance of the conspiracy. So very common and goes on all the time, yet if you speak the word conspiracy you are considered a nut case.
Appears we are letting conspirators pack sand up our southern region.
Big deal with the conspiracy theories. I have a good one for you, totally true:
I was in NYC on Sept.9 2001 to do a century bike ride around NYC. I still have the T-shirt. I drove down from Boston with a couple of friends and we stayed at my friend's place in NoHo. We were going to get up early on the 11th and go up to the observation deck at the WTC. Well, the zipper pouch on my bike fell open during the ride and I lost my car keys. I couldn't put my bike back in the car. You haven't truly lived until you've carried a bike up five flights of stairs in bike shoes after doing a century ride. My car was parked in a loading zone which became a tow zone early Monday morning, so I had to call a locksmith to break into my car and cut me a new key. Of course this was fabulously expensive and I blew all my money on it so we had to head right back to Boston. The next morning we wake up, turn on the TV and you know the rest.
45 Truth B Told Says: xoites defends Constitution @ 42:
Unlike the Theory of Evolution which has observable evidence the Theories of Conspiracy take snippetts of all the facts (because many facts are unknown) and attempt to come to a conclusion that can not be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. They raise more questions than they answer and it becomes an exponential never ending search for answers. While i have no doubt the official facts about the JFK Assasination are not true i doubt we will ever know the facts. Plausable possibilities include, but are not limited to: The MOB, Castro, The CIA, The Bush Crime Family, The Soviet Union, and on and on.
I have other things to do.
oh, just like DNA samples are just snippets in a regular crime investigation?
or fingerprints are but snippets?
If you will consider….
the standard for beginning an investigation is NOT BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT - in a grand jury - the standard is even less than beyond reasonable doubt. The standard to begin a investigation is a reasonable suspicion.
================================
Ok, it is now 45 years later. Waddayagot for the Grand Jury?
great movie!
and true!
prescient movie you say?
i submit: the siege
Yep, a great film. And if half the technology depicted in that movie was in existence back in 1998, why is Osama still alive and free today?
xoites defends Constitution @ 49:
An irrelevant point.
The people don't control the grand juries - especially in monumental cases like this. A tell tale signature of official complicity. If you can't tell that the 9-11 Commission was rigged from the get go in terms of commissioners, scope, funding, and who did or didn't testify - in open hearing under oath - and if you WONT assign proper suspicion to this act - that is YOUR fault and your blind spot.
But then, maybe you are only able to fight the small fights that the DNC says is okay to fight.
Samson- @ 51:
\
I also counter-submit -
DIE HARD 3.
watch the scene just as the subway car is going to blow up. look at the digital clock. look at what Samuel Jacksons character looks at right before when he exits the cab, and goes underground.
I'm going to have to pull that one out and watch it again. It's eerily prophetic for the times we find ourselves in.
Actually it gets more fucked up than that.
If you look at a frame in which they have an ID of the bad guy in the movie, some CIA gone wild honcho played by John Voight... the birth date of the asshole in the movie is 9/11/19XX.
Truth B Told @ 54:
LOL
ok... then i counter-counter-submit: speed 3
"A computer hacker breaks into the computer system of the Seabourn Legend cruise liner and sets it speeding on a collision course into a gigantic oil tanker"
Tyler Durden @ 56:
Tyler --
from the movie Fight Club -
the buildings at the end are all brought down in controlled demolition.
even the Twin pair that finally collapse.
from Enemy of the State - the bad guy's dossier image -
http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd216/rebel_patriot/photo9-11movieEne...
Truth B Told @ 58:
Come on now... what did we say was the first rule of flight club???
lol 1998 computers were far more sophisticated than todays
From Independence Day before the White House blows up:
http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd216/rebel_patriot/ID4-4Laptopbefore...
From Die Hard 3 before the Subway blows up:
http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd216/rebel_patriot/CaptureofTimefrom...
from Lone Gunmen pilot in 2001 - eerily mimics 9-11:
http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd216/rebel_patriot/lonegunman9-11-1.jpg
from Terminator 2:
http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd216/rebel_patriot/9-11inTerminator2...
from Gremlins 2 after the NYC building has been ransacked:
http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd216/rebel_patriot/9-11inGremlins2.jpg
an art deco stylistic one - from Batman:
http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd216/rebel_patriot/9-11inBatman.jpg
But its all just a coincidence.
Sometimes a conspiracy is, I guess, so obvious some folks overlook it. The PNAC-produced Iraq War comes to mind. And dumbya's domestic enemies-list spy network.
Truth B Told @ 13:
Yeah, that wierded me out too that they mentioed 9-11 as the conspirator's birthday in a '98 conspiracy movie of this nature. Real aluminum-foil-hat stuff....
daver @ 63:
check this one out: from Super Mario Brothers movie -
http://i221.photobucket.com/albums/dd216/rebel_patriot/SuperMarioBrother...
xoites defends Constitution @ 49:
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=11191&pid=125833&m...
LBJ wasn't in the White House more than ten minutes the evening of 11/22/63 when he got a visit from State Department operator W. Averell Harriman. Harriman told Johnson that the Soviets were not involved.
How could Harriman responsibly make such a claim 5 and a half hours after the assassination?
The only way Harriman could have stipulated to Soviet innocence was if he'd known who the real killers were.
W. Averell Harriman was the Bush Family mentor, btw.
http://www.tarpley.net/bush1.htm
Next time yer takin' your shoes off at an airport, you might want to give a thought to the impact of the Harriman/Bush crime family on the world.
Yeah, but where would one ever find paid mercenaries for hire that operate above the law as depicted in this movie??
A little hard to fathom something like this actually happening eh?
sixhundredsixtysix @ 66:
Are you serious?
for one thing...why would they have to be American?
how many Americans are there? 330 million. what is the average rate of psychopathy?
I bet you could find nearly 100,000 in the US alone that could pull this off with the right training and conditioning. The military programme itself is designed to enhance killer instincts.
And the Nazis are trying to pull this shit in Sweden now too!
http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article4150152...
And when will actblue set up a paypal account or some other NON-credit card way to contribute. I don't have much to live on much less give but if they had a NON-credit card way to contibute ON-LINE they would have gotten at least $50 from me over the past 6 months.
sixhundredsixtysix @ 66:
*cough* blackwater *cough*
Guess I should have prefaced that with "I'm going to be a little sarcastic for just a moment here"
But with all the dirty trolls around here these days I guess it wouldn’t be a stretch at all to think this was another one of those ... actually believing that.
No, I was thinking Blackwater actually. Blackwater was the answer I was looking for.
Kind of a softball there.
We have a winner!
Enemy of the State is underrated for the summer thriller genre, with some nice shout-outs to The Conversation in it. I agree, The Siege looks more prescient with time, and parts of Dr. Strangelove are barely satire.
I'm betting they (fed LE types) have something on these guys (like Hoyer), i.e., kinky sex, adultery, graft/corruption, gambling debts, etc.
Off topic, sort of, but they have something on Pelosi and Harman too, neither will go with impeachment because, as ranking members, they were briefed on the torture interrogations and did/said nothing. Through their silence they condoned violations of the Geneva Conventions and international law, not to mention law of the land. No, you will not see Pelosi green lighting impeachment that could reveal her complicity in war crimes (acquiesence to torture, with prior knowledge).
The ladies and Hoyer have been had, through their own fault, therefore they are going along.
I remember that movie - it was good. Looks very much like it warrants a second go-round.
Gene Hackman's character was written as a reprise/sequel to Harry Caul, the part he played 25 years before in Coppola's 'The Conversation'. Highly recommended, if you haven't seen it. One of the great Watergate-era conspiracy movies. Here's the trailer (it's a little cheesy, but the movie definitely isn't):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrhRsZ56b4g
Another great conspiracy movie: 'Winter Kills', with Jeff Bridges. It's an odd movie - a satire about the assassination of JFK. Hard to find, but it has been reissued on DVD. An extended clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Xpy3FxhJXY
Just curious. Cliff@65 how many copies of Catcher in the Rye do you own?
Those of you in Indiana, please remember on election day that Evan Bayh wants exactly this type of government/telcom relationship.
Captain Obama’s Bitter Half Husein Kangaroo @ 40:
Ha, I'm trying...:-)
Okay, shoot me but I love this movie. Yeah, yeah, the satellite technology is laughable -- sort of. But this is offset by Seth Green and Jack Black's bantering. Along the lines of skanky governmental behavior is Bait with Jamie Foxx.
Peter G @ 76:
Only read the book once. In junior high.
Your Mom still serving you that gov't Kool Aid, I see.
It's a pretty funny premise even a few years later. In the time it took that guy to record the footage to tape, he could have put it on YouTube.
Tyler Durden @ 56:
From Wikipedia:
"Reynolds, the antagonist and foremost proponent of the anti-privacy bill, was born on September 11, 1940 which was the date Bell Labs researcher, George Stibitz, demonstrated the first remote operation (i.e. over a phone line) of a computer machine."
Oboy @ 74:
Randi Rhodes suggested on her radio show the night that Dennis Kucinich was reading off his 35 articles of impeachment that one of the reasons many in congress shy away from impeachment is because of not only their complicity in knowing about torture policies early on, but that there is an unspoken understanding that they might get attacked the way many early opponents of attacking Iraq were, that is to say, by getting "thraxed". Knowing this administration, I wouldn't put it past them. Only Carnac the Magnificent knows for sure!
I remember in the run up to Iraq how all of the hyperbole sounded eerily familiar, especially the whole "weapons of mass destruction" schtick. I popped my Babylon 5 DVDs into the player and sure enough the excuses that Lando Molari was using to board Narn vessels outside B5 was straight out of the Bush Whitehouse. I hope it was by accident, but who knows?
mudshark @ 28:
Nice try (and an excellent movie), but Fran doesn't really want anyone - other than Fran - adding to the list.
With all this spy talk, why is it i have to put down my email address, just to leave a comment?
As far as prescient, i will submit 1984 the book and the movie, as exhibit A.
Note how much Voight looks like rumsfield in this movie, a slip of the mind? CEO
John, excellent post and point. I saw "Enemy Of The State" when it was in theaters and really liked it. And it's very creepy how Junior's Mis-administration has used the same tactics described in the film against American citizens.
Comments are closed on this entry