You can view this video right here by getting the latest version of Flash Player!
DOWNLOADS: (396)
Download WMV Download Quicktime
PLAYS: (1596)
Play WMV Play Quicktime

Frightening:

AUSTIN, Texas - A small plane crashed Thursday into a multistory office building in Austin, causing a fire and sending black smoke billowing from the seven-story structure, officials said. At least two people were injured and a third was unaccounted for.

Federal officials said the incident did not appear to be terrorism-related but authorities were investigating whether the pilot intentionally crashed the plane, according to media reports.

Authorities were investigating whether the plane crash was related to an Austin-area house fire earlier in the day.

The plane hit the Echelon Building, which is next to a major highway in north Austin.

Fires were burning from the second through fourth floors, KXAN reported. Crews used ladder trucks and hoses to battle the blazes. Dozens of windows were blown out of the hulking black building and vehicles traveling on a nearby highway paused to look.

All the initial reports are downplaying this as an act of domestic terrorism, including ABC, which reports the following statement from DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano's office:

"The Secretary is aware of the situation in Austin. We do not yet know the cause of the plane crash. At this time, we have no reason to believe there is a nexus to criminal or terrorist activity. We are in the process of coordinating with state officials and other federal partners to gather more information. At this time, we will defer additional questions to local officials and the FAA," Chandler said.

However, an NTSB official just told Fox News that this was being investigated as an intentional act.

Considering that this building reportedly mostly houses IRS buildings, it seems unlikely that it was not domestic terrorism. We'll have to wait and see.

Details as they emerge.

UPDATE: The pilot has been identified as a Joseph Andrew Stack, who appears to have left the following suicide note on the Web, titled "Well Mr. Big Brother IRS Man ... take my pound of flesh and sleep well".

It's a classic right-wing extremist rant.

UPDATE2: I'm amending this. Upon giving this a more careful reading, it's clear this is actually much more complex than your typical right-wing rant; it has a lot of standard right-wing features, particularly the fetish about the IRS and the notion that taxes are inimical to freedom; but there's obviously a lot more going on there as well. I'll post more on this later.

I'm reproducing it in full below in case it disappears from the Web:

If you’re reading this, you’re no doubt asking yourself, “Why did this have to happen?” The simple truth is that it is complicated and has been coming for a long time. The writing process, started many months ago, was intended to be therapy in the face of the looming realization that there isn’t enough therapy in the world that can fix what is really broken. Needless to say, this rant could fill volumes with example after example if I would let it. I find the process of writing it frustrating, tedious, and probably pointless… especially given my gross inability to gracefully articulate my thoughts in light of the storm raging in my head. Exactly what is therapeutic about that I’m not sure, but desperate times call for desperate measures.

We are all taught as children that without laws there would be no society, only anarchy. Sadly, starting at early ages we in this country have been brainwashed to believe that, in return for our dedication and service, our government stands for justice for all. We are further brainwashed to believe that there is freedom in this place, and that we should be ready to lay our lives down for the noble principals represented by its founding fathers. Remember? One of these was “no taxation without representation”. I have spent the total years of my adulthood unlearning that crap from only a few years of my childhood. These days anyone who really stands up for that principal is promptly labeled a “crackpot”, traitor and worse.

While very few working people would say they haven’t had their fair share of taxes (as can I), in my lifetime I can say with a great degree of certainty that there has never been a politician cast a vote on any matter with the likes of me or my interests in mind. Nor, for that matter, are they the least bit interested in me or anything I have to say.

Why is it that a handful of thugs and plunderers can commit unthinkable atrocities (and in the case of the GM executives, for scores of years) and when it’s time for their gravy train to crash under the weight of their gluttony and overwhelming stupidity, the force of the full federal government has no difficulty coming to their aid within days if not hours? Yet at the same time, the joke we call the American medical system, including the drug and insurance companies, are murdering tens of thousands of people a year and stealing from the corpses and victims they cripple, and this country’s leaders don’t see this as important as bailing out a few of their vile, rich cronies. Yet, the political “representatives” (thieves, liars, and self-serving scumbags is far more accurate) have endless time to sit around for year after year and debate the state of the “terrible health care problem”. It’s clear they see no crisis as long as the dead people don’t get in the way of their corporate profits rolling in.

And justice? You’ve got to be kidding!

How can any rational individual explain that white elephant conundrum in the middle of our tax system and, indeed, our entire legal system? Here we have a system that is, by far, too complicated for the brightest of the master scholars to understand. Yet, it mercilessly “holds accountable” its victims, claiming that they’re responsible for fully complying with laws not even the experts understand. The law “requires” a signature on the bottom of a tax filing; yet no one can say truthfully that they understand what they are signing; if that’s not “duress” than what is. If this is not the measure of a totalitarian regime, nothing is.

How did I get here?

My introduction to the real American nightmare starts back in the early ‘80s. Unfortunately after more than 16 years of school, somewhere along the line I picked up the absurd, pompous notion that I could read and understand plain English. Some friends introduced me to a group of people who were having ‘tax code’ readings and discussions. In particular, zeroed in on a section relating to the wonderful “exemptions” that make institutions like the vulgar, corrupt Catholic Church so incredibly wealthy. We carefully studied the law (with the help of some of the “best”, high-paid, experienced tax lawyers in the business), and then began to do exactly what the “big boys” were doing (except that we weren’t steeling from our congregation or lying to the government about our massive profits in the name of God). We took a great deal of care to make it all visible, following all of the rules, exactly the way the law said it was to be done.

The intent of this exercise and our efforts was to bring about a much-needed re-evaluation of the laws that allow the monsters of organized religion to make such a mockery of people who earn an honest living. However, this is where I learned that there are two “interpretations” for every law; one for the very rich, and one for the rest of us… Oh, and the monsters are the very ones making and enforcing the laws; the inquisition is still alive and well today in this country.

That little lesson in patriotism cost me $40,000+, 10 years of my life, and set my retirement plans back to 0. It made me realize for the first time that I live in a country with an ideology that is based on a total and complete lie. It also made me realize, not only how naive I had been, but also the incredible stupidity of the American public; that they buy, hook, line, and sinker, the crap about their “freedom”… and that they continue to do so with eyes closed in the face of overwhelming evidence and all that keeps happening in front of them.

Before even having to make a shaky recovery from the sting of the first lesson on what justice really means in this country (around 1984 after making my way through engineering school and still another five years of “paying my dues”), I felt I finally had to take a chance of launching my dream of becoming an independent engineer.

On the subjects of engineers and dreams of independence, I should digress somewhat to say that I’m sure that I inherited the fascination for creative problem solving from my father. I realized this at a very young age.

The significance of independence, however, came much later during my early years of college; at the age of 18 or 19 when I was living on my own as student in an apartment in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. My neighbor was an elderly retired woman (80+ seemed ancient to me at that age) who was the widowed wife of a retired steel worker. Her husband had worked all his life in the steel mills of central Pennsylvania with promises from big business and the union that, for his 30 years of service, he would have a pension and medical care to look forward to in his retirement. Instead he was one of the thousands who got nothing because the incompetent mill management and corrupt union (not to mention the government) raided their pension funds and stole their retirement. All she had was social security to live on.

In retrospect, the situation was laughable because here I was living on peanut butter and bread (or Ritz crackers when I could afford to splurge) for months at a time. When I got to know this poor figure and heard her story I felt worse for her plight than for my own (I, after all, I thought I had everything to in front of me). I was genuinely appalled at one point, as we exchanged stories and commiserated with each other over our situations, when she in her grandmotherly fashion tried to convince me that I would be “healthier” eating cat food (like her) rather than trying to get all my substance from peanut butter and bread. I couldn’t quite go there, but the impression was made. I decided that I didn’t trust big business to take care of me, and that I would take responsibility for my own future and myself.

Return to the early ‘80s, and here I was off to a terrifying start as a ‘wet-behind-the-ears’ contract software engineer... and two years later, thanks to the fine backroom, midnight effort by the sleazy executives of Arthur Andersen (the very same folks who later brought us Enron and other such calamities) and an equally sleazy New York Senator (Patrick Moynihan), we saw the passage of 1986 tax reform act with its section 1706.

For you who are unfamiliar, here is the core text of the IRS Section 1706, defining the treatment of workers (such as contract engineers) for tax purposes. Visit this link for a conference committee report (http://www.synergistech.com/1706.shtml#ConferenceCommitteeReport) regarding the intended interpretation of Section 1706 and the relevant parts of Section 530, as amended. For information on how these laws affect technical services workers and their clients, read our discussion here (http://www.synergistech.com/ic-taxlaw.shtml).

SEC. 1706. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TECHNICAL PERSONNEL.

(a) IN GENERAL - Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:

(d) EXCEPTION. - This section shall not apply in the case of an individual who pursuant to an arrangement between the taxpayer and another person, provides services for such other person as an engineer, designer, drafter, computer programmer, systems analyst, or other similarly skilled worker engaged in a similar line of work.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE. - The amendment made by this section shall apply to remuneration paid and services rendered after December 31, 1986.

Note:

· "another person" is the client in the traditional job-shop relationship.

· "taxpayer" is the recruiter, broker, agency, or job shop.

· "individual", "employee", or "worker" is you.

Admittedly, you need to read the treatment to understand what it is saying but it’s not very complicated. The bottom line is that they may as well have put my name right in the text of section (d). Moreover, they could only have been more blunt if they would have came out and directly declared me a criminal and non-citizen slave. Twenty years later, I still can’t believe my eyes.

During 1987, I spent close to $5000 of my ‘pocket change’, and at least 1000 hours of my time writing, printing, and mailing to any senator, congressman, governor, or slug that might listen; none did, and they universally treated me as if I was wasting their time. I spent countless hours on the L.A. freeways driving to meetings and any and all of the disorganized professional groups who were attempting to mount a campaign against this atrocity. This, only to discover that our efforts were being easily derailed by a few moles from the brokers who were just beginning to enjoy the windfall from the new declaration of their “freedom”. Oh, and don’t forget, for all of the time I was spending on this, I was loosing income that I couldn’t bill clients.

After months of struggling it had clearly gotten to be a futile exercise. The best we could get for all of our trouble is a pronouncement from an IRS mouthpiece that they weren’t going to enforce that provision (read harass engineers and scientists). This immediately proved to be a lie, and the mere existence of the regulation began to have its impact on my bottom line; this, of course, was the intended effect.

Again, rewind my retirement plans back to 0 and shift them into idle. If I had any sense, I clearly should have left abandoned engineering and never looked back.

Instead I got busy working 100-hour workweeks. Then came the L.A. depression of the early 1990s. Our leaders decided that they didn’t need the all of those extra Air Force bases they had in Southern California, so they were closed; just like that. The result was economic devastation in the region that rivaled the widely publicized Texas S&L fiasco. However, because the government caused it, no one gave a shit about all of the young families who lost their homes or street after street of boarded up houses abandoned to the wealthy loan companies who received government funds to “shore up” their windfall. Again, I lost my retirement.

Years later, after weathering a divorce and the constant struggle trying to build some momentum with my business, I find myself once again beginning to finally pick up some speed. Then came the .COM bust and the 911 nightmare. Our leaders decided that all aircraft were grounded for what seemed like an eternity; and long after that, ‘special’ facilities like San Francisco were on security alert for months. This made access to my customers prohibitively expensive. Ironically, after what they had done the Government came to the aid of the airlines with billions of our tax dollars … as usual they left me to rot and die while they bailed out their rich, incompetent cronies WITH MY MONEY! After these events, there went my business but not quite yet all of my retirement and savings.

By this time, I’m thinking that it might be good for a change. Bye to California, I’ll try Austin for a while. So I moved, only to find out that this is a place with a highly inflated sense of self-importance and where damn little real engineering work is done. I’ve never experienced such a hard time finding work. The rates are 1/3 of what I was earning before the crash, because pay rates here are fixed by the three or four large companies in the area who are in collusion to drive down prices and wages… and this happens because the justice department is all on the take and doesn’t give a fuck about serving anyone or anything but themselves and their rich buddies.

To survive, I was forced to cannibalize my savings and retirement, the last of which was a small IRA. This came in a year with mammoth expenses and not a single dollar of income. I filed no return that year thinking that because I didn’t have any income there was no need. The sleazy government decided that they disagreed. But they didn’t notify me in time for me to launch a legal objection so when I attempted to get a protest filed with the court I was told I was no longer entitled to due process because the time to file ran out. Bend over for another $10,000 helping of justice.

So now we come to the present. After my experience with the CPA world, following the business crash I swore that I’d never enter another accountant’s office again. But here I am with a new marriage and a boatload of undocumented income, not to mention an expensive new business asset, a piano, which I had no idea how to handle. After considerable thought I decided that it would be irresponsible NOT to get professional help; a very big mistake.

When we received the forms back I was very optimistic that they were in order. I had taken all of the years information to Bill Ross, and he came back with results very similar to what I was expecting. Except that he had neglected to include the contents of Sheryl’s unreported income; $12,700 worth of it. To make matters worse, Ross knew all along this was missing and I didn’t have a clue until he pointed it out in the middle of the audit. By that time it had become brutally evident that he was representing himself and not me.

This left me stuck in the middle of this disaster trying to defend transactions that have no relationship to anything tax-related (at least the tax-related transactions were poorly documented). Things I never knew anything about and things my wife had no clue would ever matter to anyone. The end result is… well, just look around.

I remember reading about the stock market crash before the “great” depression and how there were wealthy bankers and businessmen jumping out of windows when they realized they screwed up and lost everything. Isn’t it ironic how far we’ve come in 60 years in this country that they now know how to fix that little economic problem; they just steal from the middle class (who doesn’t have any say in it, elections are a joke) to cover their asses and it’s “business-as-usual”. Now when the wealthy fuck up, the poor get to die for the mistakes… isn’t that a clever, tidy solution.

As government agencies go, the FAA is often justifiably referred to as a tombstone agency, though they are hardly alone. The recent presidential puppet GW Bush and his cronies in their eight years certainly reinforced for all of us that this criticism rings equally true for all of the government. Nothing changes unless there is a body count (unless it is in the interest of the wealthy sows at the government trough). In a government full of hypocrites from top to bottom, life is as cheap as their lies and their self-serving laws.

I know I’m hardly the first one to decide I have had all I can stand. It has always been a myth that people have stopped dying for their freedom in this country, and it isn’t limited to the blacks, and poor immigrants. I know there have been countless before me and there are sure to be as many after. But I also know that by not adding my body to the count, I insure nothing will change. I choose to not keep looking over my shoulder at “big brother” while he strips my carcass, I choose not to ignore what is going on all around me, I choose not to pretend that business as usual won’t continue; I have just had enough.

I can only hope that the numbers quickly get too big to be white washed and ignored that the American zombies wake up and revolt; it will take nothing less. I would only hope that by striking a nerve that stimulates the inevitable double standard, knee-jerk government reaction that results in more stupid draconian restrictions people wake up and begin to see the pompous political thugs and their mindless minions for what they are. Sadly, though I spent my entire life trying to believe it wasn’t so, but violence not only is the answer, it is the only answer. The cruel joke is that the really big chunks of shit at the top have known this all along and have been laughing, at and using this awareness against, fools like me all along.

I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different. I am finally ready to stop this insanity. Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.

The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.

Joe Stack (1956-2010)

02/18/2010

Link To This Post




Comments are closed on this post.
392 comments

Shit. Less and less likely I'll ever get to fly a plane again.

I'm getting the eff outta here while there is still time. I'm going someplace with more sanity... like N Korea.

The FBI and the CIA all work out of there.

I bet that comes in handy for the IRS.

Hard to believe that somebody might have it in for the IRS somehow.

anti-tax manifesto down from his site. It is posted everywhere across the intertubes already.

Better "slaughter" the enemy before they round up your children!

to 9/11 with their spin on how Obama was asleep at the wheel which would have never happened on bush's watch.

All, without a hint of irony, nor shame.

Wrong. The tea baggers over on Fox News Face Book feel it's perfectly justified, so in a way you're right, the guy was pissed because of Obama. It't the start of the "revolution". Those people are fucking scary nuts.

Bet he was one. Hit the IRS? Taxed Enough Already taken to the extreme.

Sad story,

..Michael Medved is already claiming that this was the act of a 'Left-wing' extremist.

Medved's hero, Joseph Goebbels, would be proud of him.

After reading his screed it's hard to tell whether he's 'left or right', thoguh that dichotomy is a gross oversimplification.

However his rhetoric sounds like a lot of the Teabagger nonsense flying about there.

But my question is... this guy is whining about how much the government took from him yet he owns a house and a plane? A basic cesna is over a hundred kay. I don't own a damned plane. Most of America doesn't own a damn plane. Hell there are thousands living in tent cities right now because Wallstreet's greed. They don't own planes either.

for shit that happened to him over decades.

Yeah that makes perfect sense. Actually i didn't see anything where he was calling Obama out specifically but I would imagine this guy would see him as just another politician. Which in actuality is all he is.

It doesn't take much digging to discover that dozens of terrorist attacks both successful and attempted, foreign and domestic occurred after 9/11 on Saint Bush's watch. The least of which were the Anthrax attacks and the DC-Sniper* and the murder of Dr. Tiller**, Richard Reid, the Universal Unitarian attacks, the right wing chemical weapon attacks on a porn shop in Florida, Mailbox bomber Luke Helder (May 2003), Paul Ross Evans in 2007 and the list goes on. Lest someone accuse me of 'leftie bias' there were some minor left wing terrorism incidents as well amongst the greenies who were burning down tract homes in order to make political points as well as Muslim extremists who drove SUVs into crowded malls out west with the intent of using them as weapons to kill civilians.

Read more: Domestic Terrorism - Notable Incidents Of Domestic Terrorism http://www.libraryindex.com/pages/1920/Domest....

Naturally 'we' just choose to ignore them because 'we're' the liberal elites we go by the mantra of it's ok when neo-conservative terrorist whackos do it.

* Admittedly this was less about using terror as a means of political adjustment and more like using terror to extort money. Which makes Malvo and Mohammed less like an underwear bomber and more like the local mafia legbreakers. But hey, terrorism even if it is less spectacular and less people die is still terrorism.

** The man was murdered to make a political point about abortion. Anyone arguing that it was anything less than terrorism is either an idiot, blinded by partisan political hackery or has an exceedingly non-standard definition of what terrorism is.

)O(

Hmmm...musta gone to a Texan flight school:

[Comment Deleted By Administration For Violation Of Terms Of Service]
???

"Fort Wood"...."Merchandize"...WTF are you talking about, nimrod?

If you really wanted to criticize C&L so bad, you didn't have to make up sh1+. You could just point out that the topic is already categorized as right wing violence. (It most likely is, but we don't really know that yet)

This coming from a long time fan of C&L.

ok: the fort hood topic was categorized as right wing violence.

[Get back on topic. This post is about something that happened today-Sitemonitor]

your BS has made any posts from you completely without any credibility. Thank you for playing, good bye.

[Comment Deleted By Administration For Violation Of Terms Of Service]
[Comment Deleted By Administration For Violation Of Terms Of Service]

I'll leave it alone.

Glenn Beck, ever nostalgiac for the Cold War, is hoping they find rubles in the rubble.

is safe!

[Comment Deleted By Administration For Violation Of Terms Of Service]

is highly inappropriate. Go back to redstate, please, they enjoy that sort of thing.

If the pilot is a Muslim terrorist Fox Terror will use this as evidence that Obama is making the country unsafe by treating terrorism lightly.

If the pilot is a Teabagger/Glenn Beck viewer/Fox Terror fan they will say it is an instance of domestic terror that the Obama administration should have predicted, and the act was that of a "rogue" fan who did not represent the values of the Teabagger movement.

If the guy was suicidal they will criticize the "government bureaucrats" who neglected to see this it coming.

What they say will depend entirely on who the guy turns out to be and how much it damages their Teabagger image.

you're right. now go down your list and think about how C&L would react to each of these situations.

.

.

We must torture the pilot . . . and the janitors . . . and their pets.

because they're not keeping it all top secret.

Until the Corporate Media blames this on the left, Obama and/or Dems.

That train is never late.

Wouldn't a 'tax protest' by a teabaggish type qualify?

I'll wait for the facts, of course, but let's not delude ourselves that the lynch mobs and 'patriots' lining up under the teabag label are fully capable of these kinds of acts.

Can't a nutjob rent a Ryder truck in Austin? I know the traffic is bad, but come on...

?

A disgruntled Debra Medina fan, trying to prove a point?

Considering that this building reportedly mostly houses IRS buildings, it seems unlikely that it was not domestic terrorism. We'll have to wait and see.

Everyone knows that only radical lefty pinko Communists engage in terrorism. There has never been a documented case of anti-government, anti-tax, tea-party-pandering ideologues committing acts of violence against their illegitimate government and its representatives either in public service int he government, or in private service by upholding the values they see in their country. At least, not that will ever be admitted to by other anti-government, anti-tax, tea-party-pandering ideologues.

/sarcasm

[cough]McVey![cough]

"/sarcasm"

Use Dictionary.com to look it up.

[cough]Evans![cough]

I just heard that the house on fire was apparently owned by the pilot. That's not an absolute. Pure conjecture might be that the owner was having his house seized for back taxes. Part of the ugliness of the present economy.

And the danger of small planes dwarf to the danger of someone in a truck or even a car. The load capacity is much smaller, although the general aviation flying community is smaller than those who drive and can be made a scapegoat. You can still rent vans after Oklahoma City.

Disgruntled person, pushed over the edge, due to the economy and takes it out on the government. No big statement, just desperation.

This isn't truck-into-coffee-shop. This ultimately destroyed the facade of one side of the building.

)O(

john mccain behind the wheel again?

I wonder if this was a Tea Party attack? TEA Party meant Taxed Enough Already...they did attack the IRS building...who the heck attacks the IRS unless they are upset about taxes? Tea partiers!

Wonderful.

Media now reporting crash was intentional, man involved set his house on fire and stole plane before crashing it. Also a report authorities are investigating if man had longstanding beef with the IRS. Guess all the anti-government, anti-IRS paranoics like Beck, Boortz, etc. have racked up another one. Good job, guys. You must be so proud. As for the rest of us, we continue to ask: Why do Glenn Beck, Neil Boortz, Limbaugh and the rest hate America so much?

That's my final answer.

OR.... we might just remove our conspiracy hats for a second and consider that this particular airplane is quite stable in flight and used as a trainer. It's just as likely that the pilot was having a medical issue (heart attack, stroke) and was either unconscious or was trying to land on that major highway next to the building.

but the House fire being related to the crash makes this story more suspicious. Not necessarily political intrigue, but more than a simple health issue.

A stable aircraft only rules out the possibility of a mechanical failure, not the intent or condition of the pilot.

Must have set off the heart attack

Wasn't the plane reported stolen? Something in the news said there was no flight plan registered.

And this actually reads like a well thought out, intelligent rant to me.

... blind un-luck?

I've heard the NJ turnpike is good for this kinda thing.

)O(

it isn't terrorism ya know...

it isn't terrorism ya know...

FIFY

"I choose to not keep looking over my shoulder at “big brother” while he strips my carcass, I choose not to ignore what is going on all around me, I choose not to pretend that business as usual won’t continue; I have just had enough."

--

If this is the guy, it's hard to tell what he believes. Seems pretty much anti-government whether it's left or right.

You'd think after writing all that, he'd have been too tired to steal, much less fly a plane. I can see that his post will be used by the right wing to justify this a "leftist" terrorism though, whether or not it's a genuine post.

seems to imply he's a lefty:
The communist creed: From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.

The capitalist creed: From each according to his gullibility, to each according to his greed.

also the criticism of the Bush Admin, but absolutely no mention of Obama.

Declares it a right-wing rant. I guess in the whole anti-government sense. But the writer was definitely not a Teabagger. He could actually spell.

C&L declares it a RW rant.....the RW noise machine will be spouting off that this is LW terrorism at any minute. The post is vague enough to blur the political leaning, but I did notice criticism of corporation, Bush Admin, and capitalism. Not a good sign.

All Fox Terror looks for is a small opening and it will be "William Ayers all over again" to quote SNL.

I was going to say the same thing. Pretty good grammar, too. If it had been a teabagger, it would've been in all caps with misused there/their/they're and its/it's, etc.

YES

YOUR RIGHT!

.

vs
stealing

but many people misspell.
he did have a college ed as an engineer.
regardless, this is nuts.

I'd call it anti-sanity. Our popular media paints a picture of a country falling into tatters, as if having your family under a roof of a nice house in a nice town like Austin is as bad as it gets.

Holy shit - if this is legit, this guy sounds like a helluva lot of people I know...

Bernie Kerik gets four years for eight felony counts.

... as well. ;)

The Republicans will have to regain both houses and the presidency before Kerik can be confirmed as the new chief of Homeland Security.

\

Some white power sites are already putting up posts calling the guy a new hero. Ya think they already know something about the guy's political orientation?

more of a lefty vibe from the manifesto, unfortunately. But you never know. I hope I'm wrong.

I think this guy's beef was much more personal than a product of external political belief or affiliation.

how long before these right-wing nutbags do themselves in entirely?

Any guesses??

now? sure they are... how much more crap can people take from the rich or the government or the idiotic MSM? My guess is someone finally blew! but that's just my guess...

that after hearing about this rush linpballs got his first non-viagra boner in 10 years.

We knew it was coming and now it has begun. The far right extremists are starting to crack and we can expect more of this going forward.

The IRS office which processes tax returns from overseas is located in Austin but I don't know if it's the same building. Does anybody know?

Send it in by the 15th of April. It's not the same place.

CNN is reading his suicide note railing against the government. Hey buddy, there IS a better way. You should have left the country years ago. The smart Americans already did.

:-O

Actually the smart Americans with money fled the United States back when Bush was appointed President via treason. It took money to escape. A lot of smart people who saw what was coming could not leave due to not having the money to do so.

... investigating this as a criminal case/isolated incident and not as terrorism/terrorist-related.

by pilot now.

is going to have a field day with this....expect HUGE backlash.

Thanks a lot, nutjob.

.

Does this mean we need to begin racial profiling angry white males?

as if. As if.

If we profiled AWMs, that would be about 50% of Americans. }:-}

Because that's what happened after Oklahoma City and Columbine. They'll get right on that immediately!

Considering that this building reportedly mostly houses IRS buildings, it seems unlikely that it was not domestic terrorism.

That is QUITE a leap in logic.

... criminal act (revenge, etc.): flying your plane into IRS bldg.

... terrorist act: threatening similar incidents if IRS/government does not accede to your demands.

Um, let's see: Was the Oklahoma City bombing just a criminal act?

McVeigh and Nichols survived the bombing and were in a position to carry out similar acts, no.

The pilot would have to be part of an organization OR assured that his act was so horrific as to influence public policy.

Please don't subscribe to the it's-all-terrorism meme, David.

And if it IS terrorism, what does this tell us about the security procedures and policies we have in place? How do flight rules protect us from people who steal airplanes?

There's plenty of room for sensible discourse.

The police there said the plane was definately not stolen.

So how do the rules protect us from people who file false flight plans?

...because they blow themselves to smithereens?

at http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/terrorism

ter·ror·ism (těr'ə-rĭz'əm)
n. The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a PERSON or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
--The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition

They show the Newspeak definition as well.

terrorism

Acts of violence committed by groups that view themselves as victimized by some notable historical wrong. Although these groups have no formal connection with governments, they usually have the financial and moral backing of sympathetic governments. Typically, they stage unexpected attacks on civilian targets, including embassies and airliners, with the aim of sowing fear and confusion. Israel has been a frequent target of terrorism, but the United States has increasingly become its main target. (See also September 11 attacks, Osama bin Laden, Hezbollah, and Basque region.)
--The American Heritage® New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition

According to the "Cultural Literacy" version and MSNBC reporters, this was NOT a terrorist attack.

Is American Heritage connected with the Heritage Foundation? Will they be burning dictionaries soon?

The American Heritage dictionary is a right wing company. Look at what the stupid fucks say an atheist is.

The occupancy of the particular building does not make any reasonable explanation for the crash "unlikely." Until we know the FACTS, every explanation is "possible" at best.

It sounds to me like a man with multiple problems who just flipped out and did something awful. I don't see how anyone can put either political leaning behind it as yet. He seems to feel like he was a victim of the IRS and his goal was to get them back. If this had happened before 9-11, it would be written off as a disgruntled man who just snapped.

.

As of right now, that's my opinion too. Just because someone does something awful, it doesn't mean they necessarily had a political motivation.

9/11 changed everything?

Before 9/11, upon hearing this news, we would all feel blue. Now we're instructed to feel ORANGE.

Fuschia. What does that mean?

I've gone into plaid!

It certainly changed the media's approach to something like this. The first thing they all mentioned when this happened was is there terrorism involved. As if anything out of the ordinary must be considered as possible terrorism.

As I said in my comment at 11:02, so far all I see to this is a deeply troubled man who made a horrific final decision.

I tire of the 'OMGZ! T3rr0r!' autoresponse of the media.

We have been served up another load of terrorism hysteria, from the 'attack within 3-6 months' to the 'new, new, NEW!' photos of 9/11.

Eight years down the road, and we're still acting like frightened babies.

It's really that simple. I'll bet the guy was wearing shoes––and underwear!

What did they expect? The tea-bag movement is nothing more than a right-wing madrasah

These anti-tax crusaders always sound like they're still pissed that the kindergarten teacher made them share the crayons. The fact that this wingnut decided he'd kill people to solve his problems surprises me not at all. Being "left" or "right" makes no difference if you think paying taxes is the root of all evil.

We pay thousands in taxes without so much as a receipt to see where our money is being squandered while vast portions of our tax dollars go to support our military and the purchase of high tech weapons to kill harmless 3rd World ******s.

If that's not EVIL then, I'm missing something, somewhere!

He's railing against american style "capitalism", the current healthcare system, tax loopholes for the church, if anything, I would say he's more on the left. I'm liberal and that's just being honest. Sadly, he chose to take his life. It's sad that he felt so hopeless and powerless about the direction his life was taking. I'm just glad no one else was hurt.

This doesn't come across as a typical RW teabagging loon. Sounds liked a cracked left winger.

nothing much more.

I read through all these comments.. and this is a reply to your post here Liberalicious.. it's just a general response to them all..

I'm bothered by the fact that anyone on here is even saying he was 'troubled' - or anything like that - he deserves far worse words attached to him..

He was some guy that due to owing a lot of taxes.. crashed a plane into a building. I say don't let the decent grammar and coherent sentences in his suicide note fool you.. he was an a$$, just like anyone else who attempts to take other people out with them in a suicide attempt. It shows he's irrational, immoral, self consumed (he just wanted this suicide note posted.. and we gave him what he wanted), he was griping about freedom like any other idiot tea bagger would.. so what he also had some ideas in there from the left.. it shows he doesn't even have a coherent ideology - and it was this thoroughly confused victim ideology - where he thought of himself as the victim from all sides - that led him to this. That and a lack of humanity.

To me, I think you all are giving him too much credit because the note was well written... fact is - he was an a-hole.

mistated that first line.. I meant to say 'this ISN'T a reply to your post here Liberalicious... *sigh*.

Clearly, the author had serious mental health issues, and felt he could not get them addressed. It's tragic.

But a right wing rant? The mere fact that he complains about taxes should not be enough to label it "classic right wing." In fact, it seems like the author rants against a lot of the same thing we here rant about. Even a lot like some of the rants on the front page of C&L.

Not saying this guy is a liberal. I just don't see this as the typical, "They're coming for my guns, so I'm gonna shoot people while I can, especially since Obama and Communist Pelosi are out to hurt decent Christians" rant. Which is what I have come to think of as a classic potential right-wing terrorist rant.

...around Los Angeles at the end of the Cold War. That's not a gripe against modern capitalism, it's an argument in favor of the military-industrial complex.

I read it as he potentially lost employment or contracts with his business from the bases.

That's perhaps the first time I've ever seen you publish something so unsupportable, David. There is nothing in his statement that makes this exclusively a right wing screed. There are vague allusions to what sounds like libertarianism but that is all. Paranoia is evident throughout but that is hardly an exclusive ailment of the right wingers.

I was very surprised to see that statement.

Are you kidding me? The whole thesis is that we have "taxation without representation" (a standard Patriot theme) and that the IRS destroys our "freedom," which is not much different than your basic Freemen rant. And then there's the signoff reference to communism. Hello?

Did you even read his whole statement? Like I said above, he was railing against the current medical system, the tax loopholes for the catholic church, the two tiered justice system we have in this country, sorry but that just isn't standard RW boilerplate material. I'm not buying it.

Did he single out the catholic church only?

yes

he was did specifically single out the catholic church.

No

He refers to the "monsters of organized religion" right after the Catholic jab.

He railed against tax loopholes for others and none for him. He railed against a health care system that let's people down and makes millions for corporations. He railed against the Catholic church. And I've seen every single one of those arguments advanced from the left on this site.

criticism of the Bush Admin, railing against corporations and organized religion, and the communist reference did NOT attack it, the capitalism reference attacked capitalism. You can be a Patriot of the Left too, you know.

No kidding. He knocked the Catholic Church. He railed against a tax code not just because he had to pay taxes himself, but because opulent churches have to pay none.

The Communist sign-off actually put Communism in a better light than Capitalism.

I'm dumbfounded that C&L is calling this a right wing rant at all, much less a "classic" one just because the author complains about the IRS. What? Do progressives like the IRS? We're not unhappy to pay taxes into the commons for the common good, but I didn't realize we were fans of the institution that collected those taxes. One that presumes you guilty and forces you to prove your innocence if you're the subject of an audit.

Jeez.

Sure, there are some elements of this essay that comport with what a right wing nutcase might say. But not everything. There are a lot of complaints in there that mirror what C&L publishes.

As for the Communist sign off, did you not notice that it was followed directly by a knock at Capitalism? The author was complaining far more about Capitalistic greed than an approaching Communist menace. He was complaining that he was taught to believe in all these principles of America, and that he was disillusioned. That we are not free here, and that Capitalism does not bring the utopia he was taught it did.

I could take phrases from his manifesto, do a search and find many verbatim here in the C&L commentary threads.

This happened just a few miles north of my house. I have had realtives who worked for the IRS here, but not at that location.

This was a person who, regardless of ideology, became obsessed with how he was treated by the IRS and decided his life was no longer worth living and wanted to take people who worked for IRS out along with him.

When I first heard about this, I thought of you. I don't know why I thought you lived in Austin, but I wondered where you were and if you were okay. I'm glad you popped up here so I can stop wondering and worrying.

You just care so much.....you probably hug all your trees good morning. ;)

It's refreshing. Never change.

While watching news stories of the event I heard a low rumbling in the house, like an earthquake or the toilet with a leaky valve. My phone rings with a warning of intruders from my neighbor. Strange intruders with large containers up against my house.

Turns out it was a dreadlocked hippie from the school bus convereted to a traveling abode parked near my house.
He apparently decided to liberate a little of our fine municipal water supply for domestic use in his bus, and found my outdoor faucet a likely and convenient source.

This set off tragic memories of my days in college long ago yet just a few blocks from here where an old lady used to feed scraps to a neighborhood stray which wore a bandana and was called "Fugger" by friend and foe alike.

I wanted to show solidarity to my dreadlocked brother and tell him I had been in his huaraches before. But f*^k it. I am older now and this aint no damn campus neighborhood anymore like it was before the housing bubble. I told the damn kid to get off my lawn.

Just another damn Obama apologist abandoning his base.

who refer to George W Bush as a "puppet" and the executives of Arthur Anderson and Enron "sleazy?" Is this part of the basic Freeman rant?

... disliked Bush, and corporate power.

agreeing with Ron Paul a lot. Especially about the way this country is spending into generational debt.

Ever listen to Alex Jones?

Actually, it's true that this manifesto is much more complex than your average right-wing rant (see Jim David Adkisson for that). I've amended my original assessment above and will post more on this later.

Thank you. It's better. Otherwise end up being called as biased as Fox.

.

I'll not comment on my own opinion of the matter because it is moot for the purpose of this post.

Based on the arguments of others, you amended your post. Not everyone has the courage to change their opinion or words.

Whether right or wrong, I admire that you respected the input of the posters here and that you were willing to question yourself.

That is a sign of wisdom in my opinion.

Tim

Go back and read what those ultra-rightists had to say about Eisenhower.

I don't have time at the moment to read his statement in full, but, skimming over it, as a democratic socialist I must agree with many elements of his critique -- though I certainly don't agree with his violent, self-destructive "resolution."

For instance, he and I agree that (1) our tax money should not be redistributed to the upper class, and it would be better spent on health care reform, (2) Bush's corporatist policies were reprehensible, and (3) the ideals of communism are preferable to American capitalism (his closing remark was clearly more of a contrast than a comparison, I'd say).

I greatly admire your work, Dave, but your conclusion seems a bit premature -- better to gracefully retract it.

392 comments
Comments are closed on this post.