Go Home

Obama signs the orders closing Guantanamo prison

DOWNLOAD (167)
WMV QuickTime
PLAY (138)
WMV QuickTime

At long last:

Moving quickly to reverse his predecessor's policies on the treatment of terror suspects, President Barack Obama on Thursday signed an executive order to shut down the Guantanamo Bay prison within a year.

He also signed an executive order to require that all U.S. interrogations of terror suspects must now conform to the U.S. Army Field Manual, a move meant to restrict what the CIA can do. The president created an inter-agency task force to advise him on detainee policy.

In addition, the man tapped to oversee U.S. intelligence is promising Congress there will be no torture, harsh interrogations and warrantless wiretapping on his watch.

The direct quote from Obama:

Any interrogations taking place are going to have to abide by the Army Field Manual. We feel that the Army Field Manual reflects the best judgment of our military -- that we can abide by a rule that says we don't torture. But that we can still effectively obtain the intelligence that we need.

This is me following through on not just a commitment I made during the campaign, I think, but an understanding that dates to our founding fathers. That we are willing to observe core standards of conduct, not just when it's easy but when it's hard.

Be sure to read Glenn Greenwald's fine post today on what Americans really think about the need to torture.

UPDATE: Text of the draft order is below the fold.

Executive Order

- - - - - - -

Review and Disposition of Individuals Detained at the Guantánamo Bay Naval Base and Closure of Detention Facilities

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, in order to effect the appropriate disposition of individuals currently detained by the Department of Defense at the Guantánamo Bay Naval Base ("Guantánamo") and promptly to close the detention facilities at Guantánamo, consistent with the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States and the interests of justice, I hereby order as follows:

Section 1. Definitions. As used in this order:

(a) "Common Article 3" means Article 3 of each of the Geneva Conventions.

(b) "Geneva Conventions" means:

(i) the Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, Aug. 12, 1949 (6 UST 3114);

(ii) the Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, Aug. 12, 1949 (6 UST 3217);

(iii) the Convention Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Aug. 12, 1949 (6 UST 3316); and

(iv) the Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Aug. 12, 1949 (6 UST 3516).

(c) "Individuals currently detained at Guantánamo" and "individuals covered by this order" mean individuals currently detained by the Department of Defense in facilities at the Guantánamo Bay Naval Base whom the Department of Defense has ever determined to be or treated as enemy combatants.

Sec. 2. Findings.

(a) Over the past seven years, approximately 800 individuals whom the Federal Government has identified as enemy combatants have been detained at Guantánamo. The Federal Government has moved more than 500 such detainees from Guantánamo, either by returning them to their home country or by releasing or transferring them to a third country. The Department of Defense has determined that a number of the individuals currently detained at Guantánamo are eligible for such transfer or release.

(b) Some individuals currently detained at Guantánamo have been there for more than six years, and most have been detained for at least four years. In view of the significant concerns raised by these detentions, both within the United States and internationally, prompt and appropriate disposition of the individuals currently detained at Guantánamo and closure of the facility would further the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States and the interests of justice. Merely closing the facility without promptly determining the appropriate disposition of the individuals detained would not adequately serve those interests. To the extent practicable, the prompt and appropriate disposition of the individuals detained at Guantanamo should precede the closure of the detention facilities at Guantanamo.

(c) The individuals currently detained at Guantánamo have the constitutional privilege of the writ of habeas corpus. Most of those individuals have filed petitions for a writ of habeas corpus in Federal court challenging the lawfulness of their detention.

(d) It is in the interests of the United States that the Administration undertake a prompt and thorough review of the factual and legal bases for the continued detention of all individuals currently held at Guantánamo, and of whether their continued detention is in the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States and in the interests of justice. The unusual circumstances associated with detentions at Guantánamo require a comprehensive interagency review.

(e) New diplomatic efforts may result in an appropriate disposition of a substantial number of individuals currently detained at Guantánamo.

(f) Some individuals currently detained at Guantánamo may have committed offenses for which they should be prosecuted. It is in the interests of the United States to review whether and how any such individuals can and should be prosecuted.

(g) It is in the interests of the United States that the Administration conduct a prompt and thorough review of the circumstances of the individuals currently detained at Guantánamo who have been charged with offenses before military commissions pursuant to the Military Commissions Act of 2006, Public Law 109-366, as well as of the military commission process more generally.

Sec. 3. Closure of Detention Facilities at Guantánamo. The detention facilities at Guantánamo for individuals covered by this order shall be closed as soon as practicable, and no later than one year from the date of this order. If any individuals covered by this order remain in detention at Guantánamo at the time of closure of those detention facilities, they shall be returned to their home country, released, transferred to a third country, or transferred to another United States detention facility in a manner consistent with law and the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States.

Sec. 4. Immediate Review of All Guantánamo Detentions.

(a) Scope and Timing of Review. A review of the status of each individual currently detained at Guantánamo ("Review") shall commence immediately.

(b) Review Participants. The Review shall be conducted with the full cooperation and participation of the following officials:

(1) the Attorney General, who shall coordinate the Review;

(2) the Secretary of Defense;

(3) the Secretary of State;

(4) the Secretary of Homeland Security;

(5) the Director of National Intelligence;

(6) the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and

(7) other officers or full-time or permanent part-time employees of the United States, including employees with intelligence, counterterrorism, military, and legal expertise, as determined by the Attorney General, with the concurrence of the head of the department or agency concerned.

(c) Operation of Review. The duties of the Review participants shall include the following:

(1) Consolidation of Detainee Information. The Attorney General shall, to the extent reasonably practicable, and in coordination with the other Review participants, assemble all information in the possession of the Federal Government that pertains to any individual currently detained at Guantánamo and that is relevant to determining the proper disposition of any such individual. All executive branch departments and agencies shall promptly comply with any request of the Attorney General to provide information in their possession or control pertaining to any such individual. The Attorney General may seek further information relevant to the Review from any source.

(2) Determination of Transfer. The Review shall determine, on a rolling basis and as promptly as possible with respect to each individual currently detained at Guantánamo, whether it is possible to transfer or release the individuals consistent with the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States and, if so, whether and how the Secretary of Defense may effect their transfer or release on appropriate terms and conditions. The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, and, as appropriate, other Review participants shall work to effect promptly the release or transfer of all individuals for whom release or transfer is possible on such terms and conditions.

(3) Determination of Prosecution. In accordance with United States law, the cases of individuals detained at Guantánamo not approved for release or transfer shall be evaluated to determine whether the Federal Government should seek to prosecute the detained individuals for any offenses they may have committed, including whether it is feasible to prosecute such individuals before a court established pursuant to Article III of the United States Constitution, and the Review participants shall in turn take the necessary and appropriate steps based on such determinations.

(4) Determination of Other Disposition. With respect to any individuals currently detained at Guantánamo whose disposition is not achieved under subsections (c)(2) or (c)(3) of this section, the Review shall select lawful means, consistent with the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States and the interests of justice, for the disposition of such individuals. The appropriate authorities shall promptly implement such dispositions.

(5) Consideration of Issues Relating to Transfer to United States. The Review shall identify and consider legal, logistical, and security issues relating to the potential transfer of individuals currently detained at Guantánamo to facilities within the United States and the review participants shall work with Congress on any legislation that may be appropriate.

Sec. 5. Diplomatic Efforts. The Secretary of State shall expeditiously pursue and direct such negotiations and diplomatic efforts with foreign governments as are necessary and appropriate to implement this order.

Sec. 6. Humane Standards of Confinement. No individual currently detained at Guantánamo shall be held in the custody or under the effective control of any officer, employee, or other agent of the United States Government, or at a facility owned, operated, or controlled by a department or agency of the United States, except in conformity with all applicable laws governing the conditions of such confinement, including Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. The Secretary of Defense shall immediately undertake a review of the conditions of detention at Guantánamo to ensure full compliance with this directive. Such review shall be completed within 30 days and any necessary corrections implemented immediately thereafter.

Sec. 7. Military Commissions. The Secretary of Defense shall immediately take steps sufficient to ensure that during the pendency of the Review described in section 4 of this order no charges are sworn, or referred to a military commission, under the Military Commissions Act of 2006,

Pub. L. 109-366, and the Rules thereto, and that all proceedings of such military commissions to which charges have been referred but in which no judgment has been rendered, and all proceedings pending in the United States Court of Military Commission Review, are halted.

Sec. 8. General Provisions.

(a) Nothing in this order shall prejudice the authority of the Secretary of Defense to determine the disposition of any detainees not covered by this order.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

[signed:] Barack Obama

THE WHITE HOUSE

January 22, 2009

Share This Post

Link To This Post


228 Comments
Christopher di Spirito's picture

Thank you, President Obama!

Asousley's picture

To all you nay sayers from a week or so ago....I just have to ask...

HOW IS THAT CROW TASTING??????

John's picture

Within a year... Is anyone going to keep track of this day and see if one year rolls around and it is still open? If it is, what oh what will be said then?

I personally compare this to a project of some sort, just because you sign the paperwork and outline a schedule, doesn't mean it will actually happen or for that matter be on time. I predict if it does in fact close, it won't be for two years or more, just MHO.

Professor Farnsworth's picture

this is how they eat crow. lol. just shift the goalposts.

Well I for one love Obama, but I am still concerned that he may side up with the Bushmen. If he wants to push their agenda and it helping them stay out of jail for their mass murder administration(s) then I really am not so certain this is gonna work.

Gitmo is not the main facility and there are other floating prisons in the middle of oceans that the US tortures in. Gitmo is one of many.

We need to not pat ourselves on the back over this, but hold his feet to the fire and CLOSE THEM ALL.

And for god sakes STOP TORTURING.


'The devil crept into Heaven, God overslept on the 7th, the New World Order was born on Sept 11th.' - Immortal Technique

Paul's picture

You're right. All black prisons must likewise be closed, and all renditioning and all torture must cease for all time.

Paul's picture

Up to a year, but..immediate halt of all tribunal actions, immediate cessation of pendoing charges, immediate adherance to standards of the Geneva conventions... meaning they can no longer be held in isolation and have the right to regular interactions with representatives of the Red Cross, can receive mail, etc, must have decent living conditions. There are quite a bit of rights granted by this.

The only thing I'm leery of is transfer to third countries. It will do no good if that turns out to be renditioning.

Paul's picture

It's delicious; I'm delighted to eat it. Just got done with a first helping and I'm lining up for seconds.

Also just got done sending some major love Obama's way. Cool WH website.

w7com's picture
-*-

So I don't have to claim to be a Canadian anymore?

FilthyHarry's picture

you're gay. They're still waiting for Obama love.

No thank you, we are not waiting for his love. We want only what many people on the earth want. To be left alone.

Please don't suddenly have an crazy opinion out there about some 'Canadian' issue and let it fester and seethe and be pushed into you by a thousand pundits till finally you go off half cocked and invade us over "Lobster Freedom" or some other made up BS that you seem to suck down.

No offense but from here you guys get riled up and go completely nuts like every 10 years.


'The devil crept into Heaven, God overslept on the 7th, the New World Order was born on Sept 11th.' - Immortal Technique

anna's picture

but, I guess we do appear to be an odd bunch of folks somedays.

FilthyHarry's picture

I meant gay Americans, not Canadiens. (look, I even used the french spelling!)

france > america

And in retaliation the right puts a hold on Holder.

Thom Hartmann had a guest that said GW broke the law signing the papers that Ashcroft wouldn't sign, that the statutes of limitations runs out in March, and that if the right can keep delaying these appointments then the clock will run out on this one crime of Bush's.

FilthyHarry's picture

What? Holder's says torture is against the law!?! Well, I don't know if he's qualified to be AG then!

Fucking insanity.

Bob Roberts's picture

some will complain that a year is too long or that the US Army Field Manual is not perfect.

Those criticisms aside, I think it is undeniable that President Obama is moving quickly and effectively to undo some of the damage caused by his predecessor.

Shadowgm's picture

... beats the dithering and equivocating by Congress while the Bushies looked for 'moral clarity'.

Abbybwood's picture

What President McCain and Vice-President Palin would be doing today instead.


"The US has an army of 90,000 soldiers in Afghanistan and is spending $100bn a year, but has still been unable to defeat 20,000-25,000 Taliban who receive no pay at all." - Patrick Cockburn

ThunderMonkey's picture

and whoring out Joe.


"When are we going to stop trying to tell elected officials what to do. Our job is to spend the taxpayers' money the best way we can." -- Tommy Watkins, Justice of the Peace, Crawford County, Arkansas

liberalNmoderation's picture

Where IS Joe the...ah fuck 'em...I don't really care.

anna's picture

All I can say is WOW! and Thank God!

fiver's picture

... I'm hopeful there's more to come.


Corruption favors the wealthy.

Liberal AND Proud's picture

GOD BLESS AMERICA...and our new President.


Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.

all hail the hypno toad's picture

Wasn't torture added to a new version?

Any way, props to him for closing gitmo, will wait and see on the torture issue, it's not like we haven't been doing it for a long time now don't really expect him to stop it.

upchuck's picture

When O'dildo-boy over at Fox has his head explode on TV later today.

Shadowgm's picture

Obama's words, "... not just when it's easy, but when it's hard," echo those of John F. Kennedy as he set forth our goals for the Apollo program.

"... we choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard. Because that goal may well hold the key to our future here on Earth."

curtilingus's picture

I can't believe he threw in warrantless wiretapping. Can they just flick a switch and turn that off overnight?

CFAmick's picture

All you have to do is not do it.

We saw very little adult discussion of FISA, but as it already existed and now exists again, authorities can pretty much do anything they want in the first place.

PS I love your name, that's what I call my friend Curt now.

Centrocitta's picture

....because remember, President Obama said, "It's time to put an end to childish things".

thedonuts's picture

Thanks to the previous president for leaving so much low hanging fruit to pluck. This is a no-brainer but makes Obama look good.

CFAmick's picture

I am now proud to be American again. Feel free "lynch" me for the time I spent not being proud.

miss_kitty's picture
curtilingus's picture

"...each prisoner will receive a letter of apology and a Jack in the Box franchise in exchange for promising not to be pissed at America.

Shadowgm's picture

... get your facts straight. It's Dunkin Donuts that's overrun with terrorists.

They even coerced Rachel Ray into wearing a shemagh.

curtilingus's picture

It was Iranians that had a monopoly on the Jack in the Boxes in that area. Don't know why that's just the way it was.

miss_kitty's picture
OK

Change I can Believe in

Bruce's picture

If we can't torture, how will we find out where Jack Madoff put that $51,000,000,000?

Shadowgm's picture

It's Bernie Madoff and Jack Abramoff.

Bruce's picture

My bad!

liberalNmoderation's picture

HAWT Dayum!
We got us a real President!
Kudos!

Will have to apologize for all of their pre-emptive bitching that Obama's no different than Dubya even before the man took office...but then again, I'm just an Obama cheerleader.

[Edited. C'mon LeftandLeft. Let's not start something up with the Doubting Thomases on such a glorious day-Sitemonitor]

curtilingus's picture

Please put Nicole Belle, John Amato, Susie, Cernig to your list of Obama doubters. Each one of them expressed similar doubts to the people you mentioned above.

In my opinion, the critisisms were based on two things:
1. Obama's statements and qualifiers about what he would do.
2. Seeing past administrations go back on their campaign promises again and again.

I'm really happy with this move by Obama. But no apologies. It is political discussion. I could not imagine this site with no criticism of Obama.

LeftandLeft's picture

I stated that it was only fair to give the man a chance on the job! And don't drag in the staff of C&L to justify the fact that thus far you've been dead wrong!

curtilingus's picture

Over obama's direction?

Many of the concerns were echoed by the people you mentioned above. many of the people used good arguments and links and examples to support the assertions they made.

Why am I dragging C&L staff into the discussion of Obama doubts when they expressed doubts?

It would be easier to simply admit that your "assertions" have been incorrect so far....And in the future, hold your own dick when you pee.

Bob Roberts's picture

Many people expressed concerns about what President Obama might do. Some expressed concerns about what he was doing while President-Elect. The people L&L mentioned, however, are among those who repeatedly insisted that Democrats = Republicans, Bush = Obama, without posting any links demonstrating such BS.

As President Obama continues to prove himself very different from the outgoing administration, I'd like to see some of the people L&L mentioned admit that they were wrong. (I'm not expecting it. I'd just like to see it).

BaScOmBe's picture

Obama was pre-emptively criticised by many. Some of it for the verbal hedging he did. That said, it is a fantastic day to see the beginning of the restoration of the promise of this country.


________________
common sense matters as much as truth

upchuck's picture

No Doubting Thomases until after the second pot of coffee.

FilthyHarry's picture

There is a difference between doubting what Obama will do, and merely waiting until he does it to get excited about it.

LeftandLeft's picture

But it is just so hard not to gloat.

I'm sure your magnanimity will serve as a fine example to them.

LeftandLeft's picture

And if I were wrong like them, I'd be equally magnanimous.

And who would "me" be, exactly?

the end of this year will tell the tale on obamas wisdom and the policys he has stated , if thier are still coffins comeing home with wasted lives in a useless war the american people will not be happy, if thier are no wpa jobs for every unemployed person who needs one they will not be happy , if our jobs are still being sent overseas they will not be happy , a year from today youll get your apoligy l&l not till then ! so as for crow lets see in a year if and whos eating crow !

LeftandLeft's picture

In my community, hope is all we've got.

ConcernedCanuck's picture

community is not alone Left. Why do you think there are all the cynics? Why do you think people like me doubt? It's because, we have been around for a long time, and we've been sh*t on over and over. Right now, the economy in my neck of the woods is almost toasted. I have never seen it this bad in my lifetime and the major pain hasn't even trickled down yet.

Peter G's picture

is full of cynical people. With every thread they come to spread their special brand of sweetness and light. I believe the correct descriptive term for such people is "first desponders" . I an more than a little cynical myself but I believe there is always room for hope.


Hasa Diga Eebowai

yeah left and left who cares todays a new day! from now on im allowed to ask questions on his policys !no?

ConcernedCanuck's picture

I will give you the same response that you gave the questioners whenever Obama issued statements, or added another hawk to his administration. He's only been in power for a couple days. Too early to whip out the American flags and sing whip-a-dee-do-da out your anus. If people weren't questioning him, I am sure he would not have done what he has so far.He used the net to get elected. Think his staff isn't still using it? Let's see after 100 days what he is doing.

B's picture

Very well done and nice to see such a big promise filled so quickly.

Shorter future O'Reilly: He's just going to release terrorists into the middle of Des Moines, IA!

Shadowgm's picture

... they'll write an arc where the law keeps Jack from doing what he does best, there will be a terrorist incident, and then they'll all be pointing to the show and saying, "See?!?!? See what happens when you don't let us torture them!??!"

Same defective logic as before.

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

Oops...


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

curtilingus's picture

Keifer Sutherland gives the terrorist a hot oil rub with candles, aroma therapy and Japanese music while they peacefully discuss matters over a couple of Clove cigarettes.

B's picture

Woman president, going "carbon neutral", now Bauer-love-that-dares-not-speak-it's-name...I may have to actually watch an hour.

Thu, 01/22/2009 - 10:01 — curtilingus
Keifer Sutherland gives the terrorist a hot oil rub with candles, aroma therapy and Japanese music while they peacefully discuss matters over a couple of Clove cigarettes.

What about the hot tubs and martinis?


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

curtilingus's picture

And if they're like me, a hot tub would be considered torture.

FilthyHarry's picture

Jack's got a suspect bound and gagged (Lets say is Scarlett Johannsson, I'm gettin hot) and he tortures her for info to stop a mass casualty attack. Scarlett, lies, Jack runs off to the wrong place, mass casualty ensues. I rescue and nurture Scarlett back to health, she renounces terrorism forever out of gratitude and we run off to a island in the south pacific, and people it with the fruit of our loins.

Shoeless's picture

...the show to "12".

PolitiFact.com has an "Obamameter", which is keeping track of all 510 promises made by Obama during the campaign. Looks like he is off to a great start.

FilthyHarry's picture

That we should all be so excited because Obama did the right thing. Sad commentary on the state Bush left our country in.

BaScOmBe's picture

I think we're happy we were not forced into a coup.


________________
common sense matters as much as truth

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

That would be a tight squeeze

http://www.yesteryearkarts.com/images/models/...

palin's pud's roomier.


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

ricky's picture

This may be nice but think what real change could have looked like.

http://tesla.liketelevision.com/liketelevisio...


“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder

I'd be a pretty damn happy to have that in my driveway!

Levelheaded Moderate's picture

agreed. When Bush was in office, I had dreams that the American people overthrew their government as their right guaranteed by the DoI. Too bad too many people are sheep. =/

the NRA and the 2nd amendment nuts were full of shit to begin with.

Same here. I'd intrust my right to own a firearm to Obama LONG before I'd intrust that right to the NRA!

ricky's picture

sheep use acronyms for documents that make them appear like a drunk driving citation.


“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder

SFnomad's picture

I've been out on some of the right wingnut sites, and their heads are just imploding and they're yammering on about how President Obama is weakening our country and making us less safe.

I let them know that no, he is now strengthening our country ... and that when Failure-in-Chief Bush and his crew decided to begin torturing, that weakened our country and made us less safe.

Bob Roberts's picture

your comments received on those sites?

miss_kitty's picture

Can't have some Librul sowing seeds of content and optimism now, can we?

Drudge, Fox, and Redstate all banned, or put me in moderation Nov. 5th....I was honored.

I'm probably banned at Politico since telling them they were a propaganda site yesterday. But it's not like I planned on visiting there again. And it's not like they aren't a propaganda site.

And you can trust me, I got it from Rush.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pvm-n6gwPCY&fe...


“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder

BaScOmBe's picture

U.S. Government-issue Anthrax.


________________
common sense matters as much as truth

FilthyHarry's picture

Can you imagine ANY circumstance where the right won't be all over him for any attack, no matter what Obama's done?

BaScOmBe's picture
no

.


________________
common sense matters as much as truth

Obama strikes me as the kind of person who would accept responsibility for it even if he didn't own it, rather than finding excuses, like the last guy.

BaScOmBe's picture

O-BAM!!!!-A
Loving it!!!!!!!

Yes I am!!!!!!!!!!!


________________
common sense matters as much as truth

BigDaddyMalcontent's picture

...is largely symbolic. There is nothing inherently wrong with Gitmo; it's just a prison. Closing it focuses on the prison itself rather than the bad behavior that occurred within. What's more, those prisoners can simply be moved to another, less publicized facility.

BaScOmBe's picture

when it is used to really torture real people.

and it is really going to end.

that is real enough for me.


________________
common sense matters as much as truth


“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder

B's picture

this is one of those situations where the symbol is so potent, it becomes larger than the reality. Closing one prison or another is not the big thing here; the torture portion is and Gitmo has become synonymous with torture (and indefinite detentions without charges, etc., etc., etc.). By closing it, moving the real criminals to another prison and releasing those who should never have been picked up, it sends a message that this is a whole new way of acting.

BigDaddyMalcontent's picture

...when these places are closed, too:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...

B's picture

"A government official said Mr. Obama’s order on the C.I.A. would still allow its officers abroad to temporarily detain terrorism suspects and transfer them to other agencies, but would no longer allow the agency to carry out long-term detentions."

I hate the "temporarily detain" portion, but I'm willing to take increments.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/22/us/politics/22gitmo.html?_r=2&hp

BigDaddyMalcontent's picture
Yep

That is good news.

jwf's picture

It's only Day 2. But it looks like a good start.

Blue Lensman's picture

Symbols ARE important. If they weren't, why would so many reich-wing heads be popping right now?

Nothing wrong with Guantanamo? Then how do you explain this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XC1_ugaUAOs&fm...

Is it technically a "prison" since it holds no convicts? It's really been more of a detention center for kidnapped people. That IS what people who are taken against their will and not charged with any crime are called isn't it? If it were a prison holding convicts there wouldn't be a problem with it.

sickofnegativity's picture

David can you please fix the video download link, thank you.

[I sent an email to let the team know. Thanks for saying something-Sitemonitor]

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

Oops


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

ricky's picture

Cause instead of Obama playing to his white liberal genes,
we could've had a President take decisice action for real change.

http://tesla.liketelevision.com/liketelevisio...


“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder

Christopher di Spirito's picture

He took $1 million from the RNC. He's soiled goods and probably crazy, too.

Bob Roberts's picture

to refer to Obama as an "uncle Tom" right after Obama secured the nomination.

ricky's picture

the last time I mentioned that about Ralphie somebody whose first name is the same as a shit hole town in East Texas got mad. And he is on the thread now. And the site monitor is looking out for him. I'll be back with a more politically correct panegyric to his Emminenence King Ralph momentarily.
Watch this space.


“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder

ricky's picture

salute the courageous decision of president Obama and drive while consuming Kool Aid.

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1122/867616642...


“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder

CFAmick's picture

You ARE NOT responsible for terrorist attacks if you follow US law and restore America's standing in the world. You ARE responsbile for terrorist attacks if experts spend several months warning you of an impending attack and you go fishing at a fake ranch.

product of leftist Bush derangement syndrome. To quote somebody who knows something about GITMO, "you can't handle the truth."
Here it is:

http://www.badongo.com/pic/103431


“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder

ETHIOLIB's picture

Rule of Law...it is so nice to have you back where you belong...

Thank you Mr President!

Samson-'s picture

i support this executive order 100%

this is a tremendously brilliant early move by obama. *claps*

"He also signed an executive order to require that all U.S. interrogations of terror suspects must now conform to the U.S. Army Field Manual"

honest question: were renditions addressed in this order? as in, non-US interrogations on behalf of the US?

I'm pretty sure that renditions are prohibited under the US Army Feild Manual since they are illegal. But I'm not 100% positive, I'd just be suprised if they weren't.

jwf's picture

sir. You have begun to undo the damage of the Worst. President. Ever.

Tyler Durden's picture

I guess it pays off to have a constitutional expert as the leader of this country.

Bravo for Obama.

pissed off patricia's picture

Everyone who said "Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss." raise your hand.

This guy really is who we have been waiting for and sure as hell needed.


Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.

Asousley's picture

Tried to tell them to at least wait till he was inaugurated before they tarred and feathered him didn't we PoP...lol

But no one would listen...

.


"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."

---Southwest Airlines

Oh no! He's cutting and running! That means the terrorists have won! (sarcasm)

They should've changed Guantanamo into a resort for the kinky set.

http://www.lovefilm.com/lovefilm/images/produ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kod01XtbiLI


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

and canuck comedian to make fun of a noble chapter in our GWOT.
So I offer you justice in the form of an equally appaling cionematic effort starring the same candadian chucklehead portraying the kind of Judge these terrorist should have met at GITMO.

http://www.imdb.com/video/screenplay/vi229310...


“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder

Gunsandbigots's picture

That sound you heard was Coulter, Malkin, O'Reilly and Rush's heads exploding in unison.

Love it!

pissed off patricia's picture

It's funny as hell that you said that because I just heard a loud noise. I thought it was a car backfiring but now I know different. ;)


Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.

Gotta include both Sean Hannity and Glen Becks noggins in there also, or did theirs already blow up when Obama took the oath?

Gunsandbigots's picture

Listen to him speak. Intelligent, articulate and in complete sentences. Is this for real or am I just dreaming?

fastfeat's picture

And a black elitist at that. Oh the horror...


"Parachutes are allowed in checked or carry-on baggage, but may not be worn in flight."

---Southwest Airlines

It's great, isn't it. We now have a president who uses words my six-year-old nephew might have trouble understanding.

smchris's picture

_Next_, we get to see whether Obama respects the rule of law and makes sure Conyers knows Justice will do anything Congress legally orders to prosecute Bush regime lawbreaking. Otherwise, after Obama what are the odds we will have a _bad_ little dictatorlet again who doesn't respect the rule of law?

Levelheaded Moderate's picture

caught by Jon Stewart. You can find this at the 2 minute mark.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml...
(Tried posting the actual video but I failed everytime, so I have to settle for linkage.

JS: Finally, there is FOX. They spent the better part of 8 years lovingly following every move George Bush has made. How would they handle the day when it was Barack Obama in the spotlight?

[snip]

Fox News Anchor: We are now looking live in Midland, TX when Former President George W. Bush...

JS: Let it go...he's gone. If you love an administration, set it free. If it comes back, we're all moving to Canada.

fiver's picture

... to home?


Corruption favors the wealthy.

Levelheaded Moderate's picture

I miss everything.

fiver's picture

:)


Corruption favors the wealthy.

St. James's picture

[Deleted-Sitemonitor]

fiver's picture

... the patron saint of auto-eroticism?


Corruption favors the wealthy.

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

He fellates exhaust pipes?


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

I'm an American so how closing Gitmo effected me is that I'm no longer a criminal for allowing that illegal unAmerican travisty to exist in the first place.

jwf's picture

Is that you? Did you get your Oxy fix today? You seem cranky.

jwf's picture

to St. James.

lemme guess: going bonkers at the shitty "office" and coming over from redstate after seeing the news?

ConcernedCanuck's picture

Couple of days on the job, and a few good decisions. Bravo. I don't recall anyone saying he would not close down Gitmo, but I digress. Where are these people going now? If they are transferred to US soil, it opens up a whole new can of worms. Like, now you have them detained in the real world, where those pesky Geneva Rights and all that exist. That brings up the illegality of a lot of this so now you won't be able to ignore calls for investigating the Bush Regime.

So before everybody breaks out the party, and calls in the band, perhaps should he not answer those questions? I am yet to hear his administration say anything about that.

miss_kitty's picture

That's why it's a year. The US has plenty of shitty federal pens that these guys also don't deserve to be interred in.

In the US, if you don't receive a speedy trial, you don't get tried. You go free. Or if other of your rights are violated. Our Constitution doesn't specify citizen or non citizen. It means every one to a man.

And all that pesky Geneva shit has counted, whether CheneyBushCo opined it didn't.

And contrary to the Great Assholes' Opinions, Guantanamo, occupied territory in Cuba, IS US soil. We swiped it from Cuba and claimed it as ours. We occupied it with a prison and tortured people there. We don't get to say "It's not American soil." It's not a magic switch, a King's X we can pull out of our arses and claim innocence. And just the small bit of utter repudiation President Obama has dished out to Preznit Asshole makes me believe he just might think something similar.

Jeez buddy, I kinda see how you get on everyone's pecs. Christ. It's day 2. You think the McShit/Palin ticket would be all assholes and elbows trying to patch up the last 8 years of bullshit? I think they'd be out on a Victory Lap/Waving Tour right now.

Sungrey's picture

I have no problem with the "up to one year" delay, since they have to figure out what to do with the prisoners that are currently in Guantanamo in the meantime.

For the neocons who think this marks the beginning of the end of 'Murica, ya'll can leave and move to ... whatever country will take you guys. Personally, I don't think anyone will!

Ravin.Sangha's picture

and how quickly he got to it. That being said, a year is a long time for those, like Omar Khadr, who should have never been there in the first place.

srhoads's picture

I find it interesting that less than 48 hours into his administration, President Obama has already taken the first steps in weakening our Nation's ability to defend itself against international Terrorism by closing Guantanamo Bay, and by limiting the CIA's ability to use those interrogation tactics which have been most effective in preventing further terror attacks in the aftermath of 9/11.

The President should be reminded that his primary responsibility is to preserve, protect and defend the citizens of this Nation, rather than try to improve his own standing internationally by putting a smiley face on U.S. foreign policy.

This is precisely the naive world view that so many people feared an Obama presidency would bring. More troubling, however, is the fact that his decision to take this action as literally one of the first acts of his administration, without so much as a cursory review of the policy or the intelligence community's rationale for its continuity, demonstrates his reckless disregard for our security. While I, like many Americans are comfortable giving the new President the benefit of the doubt on a variety of issues, I am not prepared to do so when his actions, directly or indirectly, put American lives at risk.

President Obama should realize that he is no longer in the Senate, where he was free to espouse all of the "feel good" positions he wanted to without the consequences that attached to them. Now, his decisions affect real people in very real ways with potentially deadly consequences.

Sadly, I fear that this is but a first step in tying the hands of the intelligence community in their efforts to keep Americans safe from terrorism. Can there be any doubt that the Patriot Act is next on the agenda? Perhaps the Obama strategy is to wait for the terrorists to see the error of their ways and turn themselves in. He's the President and he should know that if American blood is shed as a result of this strategy, it is on his hands. Freedom must be defended....not sold out to score political points, and I would hope that he shows more wisdom and more backbone in his future decisions.

Alice X - Chomsky Nader's picture

Dismantle the CIA.

Reverse the FISA update of 2008.

Reverse Telecom Immunity.


statusquObama, change you can only pretend in

How does closing Guantanamo and putting terrorism suspects through a "legal" court system hurt the war on terror?

Are you saying you're pro-torture? That, to me and our founding fathers, is anti-American. So you are saying you're anti-American?

ysbaddaden's picture
)O(

I'm not sure if sroids is shovelling propaganda or propaganga.


Diabolus est Deus Inversus

I would say propaganga. By putting terrorism suspects through court proceedings America might be able to convict some of these guys who have been sitting in a legal limbo since they were captured years ago.

Isn't getting convictions a win for the war on terr'rism? All people like sroids wants to do is keep suspects - some of whom might be innocent - in prison without charges. That is anti-American because monarchs were usually the ones who could imprison people forever without cause.

Comments are closed on this entry