O'Reilly in Bircherville: Obama's selling us out to 'one world government'
Now there's what you would call a leading question:
Is President Obama selling out America?
That's how Bill O'Reilly started out last night's "Talking Points Memo" segment of his Fox News show: A question that none-too-subtly accuses the president of betraying not just his oath but the nation at large. Like the kind of thing John Birch Society members and militia leaders do reflexively.
And sure enough, he was off and running, helping promote the Bircherite notion that Obama is taking us toward a nefarious "one world government" in which America is enslaved under global rule:
Talking points believes fear is driving the president's numbers down -- some Americans believing he's not been effective on the economy so far, others feel his policies are too socialistic, with the Congressional Budget Office estimating the USA will run up about $9 trillion in deficit over the next ten years.
Some conservative pundits actually believe President Obama is a "Star Chamber" guy -- a man who secretly wants to turn America into a progressive country modeled on Western Europe. Also, they think, he wants to lessen the power of America and sign up for a one-world combine of governance.
In the past, that kind of thinking was labeled loony, but that's changing. Writing in today's Wall Street Journal, the former prime minister of Denmark said:
In Europe, we have been protected from the worst effects of the crisis thanks to welfare states built up over the past 60 years to cushion citizens from the threats posed by the free market. We can all count on state health care, social housing, education, unemployment support and other universal, tax-funded services. ...
The simplistic dictum of more markets and less government -- championed by Reagan, Thatcher and their ideological heirs -- has failed on a momentous scale. ...
I am hopeful that the G-20 will make progress ... We must keep up the pressure by demanding a globalization that works for everyone, and forge new alliances and new lines of communication across national boundaries. We must develop new, progressive ways to achieve global justice.
Well, Karl Marx could not have said it better. Global justice requires that a one-world government seize private property and distribute it so that every human being has roughly the same amount of resources.
So there you have it: "global justice" equals "one world government." Evidently, all that talk about cooperation is just
Now, when O'Reilly says "some conservative pundits" believe this stuff, he means far-right nutcases like Alan Keyes and the Birch Society. And while he tries to set position himself as being somehow slightly skeptical of such notions, in reality, this whole rant is nothing but an endorsement of their worldview.
Next: O'Reilly wonders aloud if a black man is capable of being president, because "some conservatives" have claimed all along he is incompetent by virtue of his mixed race ...
But what's noteworthy about this rant is that the basis for his thesis is, once again, entirely groundless -- because not only does Poul Nyrup Rasumussen, the European socialist whose op-ed he cites, have absolutely nothing to do with either President Obama or any of the G-20 leaders who met in London, but he doesn't actually promote a "global government" (beyond building an international framework for cooperation) or any of the other things O'Reilly characterizes the op-ed as saying.
You can read it yourself:
Note first of all O'Reilly's deceptive edit of the conclusive quote in his citation:
I am hopeful that the G-20 will make progress on these areas. But we cannot just leave it to them. We must keep up the pressure by demanding a globalization that works for everyone, and forge new alliances and new lines of communication across national boundaries. We must develop new, progressive ways to achieve global justice.
The "leave it to them" line makes irrevocably clear that Rasmussen sees the G-20 leaders as quite a separate entity from his own group of European Socialists. O'Reilly, however, is invested in suggesting that Obama is in bed with them, so of course it was edited out.
Indeed, Rasmussen even identifies himself with a separate group of socialists:
That's why, as the G-20 meets in London, an even larger group will meet in Brussels -- a group of progressive politicians, trade unionists, NGOs, academics and figures from major international institutions. This is the world conference of the Global Progressive Forum (GPF), which will bring together speakers from five continents to develop a new vision of a globalized world which benefits all. The GPF will take place in the European Parliament and will be opened by Bill Clinton. It will feature debates and discussions on the issues of global governance, trade, financial markets, decent work, migration and climate change, all aimed at coordinating global answers to what are global crises. It shows that the world's progressives are serious about making a solidaristic social model a reality for all.
This points up the larger problem: Rasmussen never argues for "global governance" beyond having a framework that creates international cooperation. He doesn't argue for "redistribution of wealth." None of this remotely suggests secret plans for creating a "one world government" -- unless you're a right-wing paranoid.
Weren't the reichwingers for a one-world government
As long as boosh was the dictaterer?
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
Isn't in the Rapture Right who want the proficized "one world government" so that the stage will be set for Jesus to come back on the pile of bodies that this athoritative power leaves in it's wake?
I've heard them go on and on about it, so what is there problem? is it just because it's not Bush doing it?
**I'm not saying Obama is leading us to any new type of Government - I'm just saying it seem the only grip these fools have is that it's not their boy leading them into the rapture.
I think bill o'really's gonna have a rupture.
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
has already exploded.
surely are not suggesting Bill doesn't already know how to heal himself if he does suffer one?
http://blog.modernmechanix.com/mags/qf/c/Mode...
“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder
know of anyone that wants a one-world government, except for those crazy people on the far left.
I assume, though, that you would label anyone wanting a so-called "one-world government" as far left, no? So of course those are the only ones you know.
I for one like the idea of a single world government. Do you truly believe in democracy, Wagner? Or is it just a hollow war cry to you? Because if you do believe in democracy and that the people should have a voice, then I would think you would welcome a single world government where all people have a voice. However, if you think that the only people that should have say are those that think like yourself, then you don't really believe in democracy, and you yourself are far right/left.
I don't know if the world is ready for a single government or when it will be, but I certainly like the idea of one.
waaaahhhhhh the sky is falling...save us Billo!!!!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNwj0ExB1No
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVpyKxpsadg&fe...
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
America was sold out to the corporatists years ago.
I'm impressed. Fat head managed to go a whole fifteen seconds without mentioning George Soros.
...with loofahs and falafels.
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
would make you gag.
“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder
ON THE TELEPROMTER.
And then came Hannity and Beck. Bill's mad 'cause he's running third in The Crazy Derby!
Every day...they keep ramping up the crazy!!
It's hysterical!! LOLOLOL!
Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.
with their New World Order, with the US in the lead. and Sonny Boy Bush tried to make it so as well, but fucked it up, as usual.
Why wasn't this bad under Reagan Bush Bush, assclown?
what a lying dick.
me-oww!
O'Really has no balls.
BillO appears to be ready for the looney bin. He surely won't have a program if his rampant paranoia continues to influence his pea brain and skew his thought processes.
Bush did everything within his power to totally "endanger our national security" by bullying every country on earth. They all HATED him and continue to LOATHE Republicans because they "aided and abetted" Herr Bush.
Poor, poor paranoid BillO! Maybe we can all chip in and send him off to some rehab center?
And we all thought that the most disgusting gaseous aroma erupted from one's anal orifice? Bill O has just proven this theory wrong - his mouth is the equivalent to anyone else's anus.
are down. Yeah right, keep dreaming. Maybe you are confusing your dropping numbers with the President's stable and increasing support, ya f'ing idiot.
Yeah I kinda thought all the recent polls(except for the discredited one from some rightwing polling place) show his approval rating increasing. I guess like usual they think if they keep repeating the lies enough they'll make it come true.
I'm just wondering why he didn't go after Walrus Bolton when he was pushing HIS version of a "One World Government". And if he's so all fired worried about it why the hell doesn't the America hating idiot flee the country. I know there's a couple of hundred million Americans who'd be happy to help him pack and see him gone.
I find your categorizing of those pinko hippies like Alan Keyes and the John Birch Society as 'far-right' offensive.
If O'Reilly really believed in one world government then he would know that the President has no real power. The oligarchs rule supreme and the President is only a figure head. So how can he sell us to the One world government?
Anyway, O Reilly is a jackass. In his own way, he's part of the problem. The only reason he saying this junk is to keep up the "Professional" Wrestling Match we know as Left VS Right wing politics. As long as we all keep argueing as to who's side is better, or who has the better leader, we are all going to continue to collectivly get screwed. I surprised that with all that's happened in the last 10 years that we all haven't figured that out yet.
No World Order. Or is it Nether World Odor?
“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder
Old World Neuter?
Vote GOP and move forward to the 18th Century.
Does that involve rubber bands?
employed by alien Uranian urologists with uranium.
“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder
Fri, 04/03/2009 - 12:51 — Shoeless
Does that involve rubber bands?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNNGkybsLUI
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
http://blog.modernmechanix.com/mags/qf/c/Mode...
“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder
B.O., I mean Barack Obama
The right-wingers are incapable of doing any real thinking about anything, because their fears get in there and screw up their thinking processes.
What’s the Difference Between a Conservative and a Liberal?
...but you're conclusion is wrong.
They have no fears (except maybe dying poor) and their purpose is to make YOU fearful so they can control YOU. Oh, yeah. Their thinking is really clear on that point.
We're not going to get very far if you keep injecting logic into the conversation!
said we make our worst decisions out of fear? B.O.
Who then said we have to pass this bill w/out reading it because everything is going to collapse, if we don't? B.O.
Your right. Fear, Fear, Fear
And some conservatives think the planet earth is between four and six thousands years old instead of 4.5 billion years old. And some conservatives think that science is a matter of subjective philosophical belief rather than measurable objective empirical evidence. And some conservatives think that torturing captives to death is an act of patriotism rather than an act of barbarianism. And some conservatives think that George W. Bush and Richard B. Cheney were competent civil servants instead of megalomaniacal sociopaths.
There is no such thing as objective truth- everything is "fair and balanced" . "A progressive America" sounds just terrifying, doesn't it? Harvard should revoke this putz's degree
And those conservatives comprise the Glenn Beck fan club.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
GOON
Every day, BillO the clown sounds more and more absurd, ridiculous, paranoid, and irrelevant... if he wasn't reaching so many right wing nutbags, who would care what lies spew from his piehole.
[Deleted-Sitemonitor].
I mean, it's clearly stated in the TOU or whatever you want to call it: this is a left-wing site. And no, it's not far-left. I can't even find a site that's really truly far-left. I defy you to find one. People on the right think anything that isn't Lieberman is far-left, and that's pathetic....
I don't think Lieberman is far left. But you people are.
...Joe Hill and Samuel Gompers.
I don't like to use the term, but you are a troller- just throwing out bait hoping someone will bite. How about you actually make arguments with individuals with whom you have a difference, rather than "you people"?
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
so you can see the truth, skippy. There are very few, if any, left-wing "nuts" here.
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" - Red Green
Freedom Ain't Free - Pay Your Share
you protest too much
Some conservatives say Barack Obama is a fire-breathing lizard who drives a flying banana and eats rainbows and children's dreams.
Let's talk about it...
I was waiting for this to come out of this G20 conference. It was inevitable. It's a tired, old idea and fear and it was inevitable. The thing is, blowhard BillO no doubt thinks its an original idea. As soon as they started talking about the needs for international finance rules, I knew this "world government" brouhaha would be brought out.
Oh, God, not WORLD GOVERNMENT! NOT THAT!
It's such an old canard.
Wait 'til they hear about the development of a world currency developing. It was on NPR this morning. It'll be a few weeks 'til BillO hears about that one. (We know he doesn't read, for pity's sake).
Mo Rage
http://moravings.blogspot.com
Olbermann nailed it -- Billo the Clown
I'm numb to the likes of this guy. Predictable lies, appealing to race hate and white trash ignorance, whether his comments are proven true or not doesn't mean shit to the knuckle draggers who want to believe the worst things possible concerning Obama.
O'Reilly, Beck, Hannity, Rush et al make millions off of ignorant people who'll buy into any bullshit that tells them some group is beneath them.
"...secretly wants to turn America into a progressive country modeled on Western Europe."
I hear this kind of crap often from the right -- the EU is always held up as some kind of awful example. Just exactly what is so wrong with Western Europe? The average worker is much better off there than in the USA from what I can see.
exactly. Hmmm, a "progressive" country. As opposed to what? Non-progressive? Why wouldn't you want to be "progressive"? What's not good and positive about progresive? And France? Uh, yeah, I'll take some of that French intelligence and equality and downright "happiness" any day, all day, all year.
"Talking points believes fear is driving the president's numbers down -- some Americans believing he's not been effective on the economy so far,.."
Billo, that "Fear" you speak of is actually driving the President's numbers UP. Wow, you're wrong there! And as far as not being effective? Hmm, he's been in office less than 100 days and he inherited the largest economic mess in the history of the world (that's the world, not just our country, Billo) AND he's only just begun so yeah, one might say "he's not been effective..". That is, one would say that if he were a "douchebag". So..if the shoe fits..
Mickey: "It was an epiphany. Do you know what an epipany is?"
Keoni: "NOT NOW MICKEY!"
There's that one dude out by he interstate who thinks he sucks. Plus Rush, JMac and the Naysayers, and Cantor. That's some right there!
BillO and Beck are now in a race toward the bottom. Beck is ahead so BillO has to try harder. I'm not sure where Hannity is in the race.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
Hannity's gonna challenge the winner.
Cage match? Please get them both in a cage, all three if that's possible. We'll take the cage to the nearest mental hospital and let them out there.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
Lou Dobbs could be the ref.
Lou can lay down and we'll use him as the mat that the fight takes place upon. He would be all bouncy and make the fight more fun.
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
the cage walls.
“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder
other halfwits. His "America the greatest, best country God has ever given man on the face of the Earth." campaign of 6-6-08 seemed like a fast track to Crazyville, but he wasn't committed enough to bring it up every goddamn time he was on the air.
Sean, resurrect "America the greatest, best country God has ever given man on the face of the Earth." schtick, but this time, tear up and make your voice all croaky as you say it, wipe a [fake] tear away...you'll get there, little fella.
me-oww!
BillO talks about his Talking Points Memo like it's some other person. "Talking points believes...blah". I like it so much, I'd like to offer a second to B's comment.
Thanks. B's comment believes BillO is a douchebag. Some commentators have told B's comment that BillO doesn't believe a damn thing he says, but is pissing all over himself about Beck's ratings. Further, sources tell B's comment that BillO wears ladies undergarments. B's comment will watch this closely, but not too closely, since the idea of BillO in ladies undergarments makes B's comments a bit queasy.
That's good and funny too :)
Say what you mean. Mean what you say. But don't say it mean.
and the really funny thing is, this was all just a plug for his book, anyway!
HAHAHAHAHA
Thanks, BillO!
Mo Rage
So, Bill O'Reilly aside, does everyone here support the notion of a global economy?
Does everyone feel that the people in the G 20 (it isn't just 20 world leaders)are engineering an economy that is in the best interests of the people or businesses?
... as if it's some mew thing. We've had a "global economy" since Great Britain was a viable empire. Many company's have been global for over half a century. Only governments (and pinheads) think "global economy" is new.
We're not going to get very far if you keep injecting logic into the conversation!
I don't know if you are familiar with NAFTA, its intentions and its actual rammifications, but large scale trade of goods and workers is NOT a good idea.
take the argument that you should consume food that is grown locally and realize that a lot of produce, common produce that is consumed in Southern California is trucked in from Texas, the East Coast, Chile. What are the costs of that? Why is it done when all the items can be grown in Southern California?
Why does everything we produce need to be broadcast across the world? because the world is the largest market, the dollars involved and the profits benefit the corporations.
Yes global trade has been around for centuries, but the "corporation" has only been around a little more than one century.
Globalization is not good, we need to think, produce and consume locally.
"Globalization is not good, we need to think, produce and consume locally."
I'm just saying that the pretend hysteria about "global" anything needs to take a rest. It's not new. Pretending so is just fear-mongering.
Let's get to work on the problems of globalization.
We're not going to get very far if you keep injecting logic into the conversation!
“Obama is taking us toward a nefarious "one world government" in which America is enslaved under global rule”
Well, I suppose if criminality in the financial system of a certain rouge nation is enough to bring down the world's economy, and the world continues on this free trade and interconnected financial systems, then, there is going to be a demand by the innocent parties that the rouge nation be subject to the rules of less criminal societies.
The alternative to that is for that rouge nation to withdraw from free trade, go into fiscal isolation and carry on with their financial crimes to their hearts content. But O'Reilly didn't want to touch on that for some reason.
(Soviet Canuckistan is what Pat Buchanan called Canada in a debate about public health care) . . . we have some universal social programs, including single payer health insurance.
We also have 12 years of federal budget surpluses (though a deficit at present, alas, thanks to the recession), provincial budget surpluses, a profitable and well-capitalized banking system (no bailouts required!), vastly lower private and public debt per capita, a stable housing market, and better economic performance than the US in almost every respect.
Capitalism is alive and well in the great white socialist paradise to the north of you.
I thought Canuckistan was a breakaway republic. Sorry, I don't keep up with BBC World News.
We're not going to get very far if you keep injecting logic into the conversation!
Since it still recognizes HRHQEII. They are on BBC One.
“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder
... and we're looking for return on investment on the high defense budgets we have. Maybe we'll have to send them north of the border and rob your banks. So, you might want to keep all that good news to yourelf. ;-)
in winning World War II, but at least the Canadian war effort produced Eric Clapton.
“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder
If the margin for error is plus or minus 3 percent for Obama's approval rating - that means you cannot say that his approval rating has slipped if it is 63% at the beginning of March and 58% at the beginning of April.
In fact, Obama's approval rating could have risen (given the margin of error) from 60% in March to 61% in April. Of course, these are facts that O'Reilly can't, or won't, grasp.
from 66% to 55% using that analysis.p>
“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder
You cannot say that it has fallen or risen if the margin of error overlaps. The statistics are meaningless to the point O'Reilly is trying to make.
Plus their wording of questions make their results nothing more than push polls. Their polling is as dishonest as the liar OReilly.
I got my Moose. And your point. We are both within the margin of error.
“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder
took the poll? If it was a Fox poll and they want more disapprovals they can just poll a different republican stronghold.
Idiot blows away several (8?) people then kills himself.
Y'know, we've got to help these people! We've got to teach them to start with themselves!!
(OOPS! Sorry. Waayy off-topic.)
We're not going to get very far if you keep injecting logic into the conversation!
O'Reilly-Dobbs-Killing immigrants. Just don't mention Kevin Bacon.
“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder
What would be so bad about America becoming a "progressive country modelled on Western Europe?" From what I see life is pretty sweet in most of those places. The standard of living is high, great healthcare, long paid leave for new parents (now that's some family values for you.) I honestly don't see a down side. Sure the taxes are high but you'd be paying that much if not more to private insurers, etc. if they weren't. Honestly what's the problem (other than the fact that this is not at all what Obama wants to do?)
We'll all be required to convert to Druidism?
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
back to the basics...
if the CEO's over here are so smart,(they're paid much more than European CEO's) how come is it, that they can't figure out a way for everybody to have 6 paid weeks of vacation, universal health care and an affordable education system and still make a profit like those European CEO's do.
By people like Stan Goff and Michael Chossudovsky. We're living what they predicted so long ago. And the ride ain't over yet.
If you want to get a good idea about what is happening and where it's going, you might want to go to Chossudovsky's Website Global Research
Here's a little taste: Economic Meltdown: The "Dollar Glut" is What Finances America's Global Military Build-up
"The U.S. media are silent about the most important topic policy makers are discussing here (and I suspect in Asia too): how to protect their countries from three inter-related dynamics: (1) the surplus dollars pouring into the rest of the world for yet further financial speculation and corporate takeovers; (2) the fact that central banks are obliged to recycle these dollar inflows to buy U.S. Treasury bonds to finance the federal U.S. budget deficit; and most important (but most suppressed in the U.S. media, (3) the military character of the U.S. payments deficit and the domestic federal budget deficit.
Strange as it may seem and irrational as it would be in a more logical system of world diplomacy the "dollar glut" is what finances America's global military build-up. It forces foreign central banks to bear the costs of America's expanding military empire effective "taxation without representation." Keeping international reserves in "dollars" means recycling their dollar inflows to buy U.S. Treasury bills U.S. government debt issued largely to finance the military.
To date, countries have been as powerless to defend themselves against the fact that this compulsory financing of U.S. military spending is built into the global financial system. Neoliberal economists applaud this as "equilibrium," as if it is part of economic nature and "free markets" rather than bare-knuckle diplomacy wielded with increasing aggressiveness by U.S. officials. The mass media chime in, pretending that recycling the dollar glut to finance U.S. military spending is "showing their faith in U.S. economic strength" by sending "their" dollars here to "invest." It is as if a choice is involved, not financial and diplomatic compulsion to choose merely between "Yes" (from China, reluctantly), "Yes, please" (from Japan and the European Union) and "Yes, thank you" (Britain, Georgia and Australia).
Well it looks like the long anticipated contest to see who can out-loony the other between Beck and O'reilly has finally started in earnest. Like road hockey, anybody can jump in and there aren't any particular rules. There are no officials and the game only ends when their respective moms call them home for dinner. No time outs either unless somebody yells "car".
Hasa Diga Eebowai
I wonder how many points those two would be worth in a Death Race.
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
Beck reminds me of the last kid picked when choosing teams for road hockey. Last stick in the pile. O Really reminds me of the guys i used to surgically attach myself to and check their brains out till they went nuts on me and ended up taking stupid penalties. " Nice check sweetheart ! "
description of Beck. Especially when the stick pile looks like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KsZ17XB1Ao
Hasa Diga Eebowai
BillO pissed me off last night when I saw this, so I sent him a scathing email.
Near the end of his rant, he asks if Obama is "down with his global justice jihad." Why does the a'hole use such a pejorative word, jihad, when talking about Obama?
Why does Obama even need to "repudiate" this crap coming from the right wing pundits? You know darned well that even if Obama did repudiate this nonsense, those same right wing pundits would not believe him, they'd call him a liar, and they would continue spewing their crap.
Why should B.O. have to answer to any critics. Let's just make him above the law. That way he can be the king that you want. Never criticize him or hold him accountable. You are so right. Don't you just hate those people that try to hold elected officials accountable? They suck, huh?
There was an entire post jsut a few days ago... About how criticism, especially from his own party, can help President Obama.
However, this is not criticism. This is wingnuttery. Fear-mongering based on party. It makes no sense and therefore is not an intellignet debate, as we should have, but is instead the ignorant shrilling of a person who is going to ahte Barack Obama no matter what he does or how much he succeeds.
[Deleted, Off topic-Sitemonitor]
Nowhere in the General's comment did e say, or even infer, that no-one should criticize the President. But, in your oh so incompetent world, lacking even the basics of intellectual honesty and comprehension, you just HAD to go and make shit up.
Now, did you have anything productive to add here, or are you just going to keep flinging poo around like a mad monkey?
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" - Red Green
Freedom Ain't Free - Pay Your Share
how to post where other people were still participating. Please do not encourage him.
“Why would anyone with a functioning brain believe this guy?”
Some guy with an eating disorder
Please let me know, because honesty is important to me. Unlike, our politicians. And I mean all of them-not just the ones on the left.
Again, there has been no call to prevent criticizing the President (BTW, it is common courtesy to refer to him as the President, or as President Obama, skippy) as you have indicated. Thus, you have "made shit up", and flung it around here like a mad monkey. Will you engage in honest discourse, or will you just continue your juvenile primate antics?
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" - Red Green
Freedom Ain't Free - Pay Your Share
Your being a racist!
But no. Care to try again?
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" - Red Green
Freedom Ain't Free - Pay Your Share
when talking about Obama?"
I think this one might be easily explained, my dear General. Perhaps the repugnants are not quite ready to let go of the Obama As Secret Muslim meme that polluted the campaign!
"The greatest tyranny is censoring information in order to be better able to control people." - Cristina Saralegui
So would National Justice require that a federal government seize private property and distribute it so that every citizen has roughly the same amount of resources?
And O'Reilly is saying that justice equals extreme socialism? And I can only assume that as a good patriotic American, O'Reilly would be claim to support the concept of justice. Wow, how progressive of him! We've got to keep an eye on these far-left loons like O'Reilly.
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/07/24/art...
Diabolus est Deus Inversus
How can anyone take this fool for anything other than that...a fool. Yes, I'm aware that his program is #1 for 100 months running. That in itself speaks to the level of intelligence of his viewers/supporters. Seriously, unbelievable.
"President Obama selling out America"
I think BillO just gave us a preview of what his upcoming book on Obama is going to conclude.
You ever see Obama drink a glass of water, Mandrake?
free speech is one thing in America,
but billo has and is going far beyond
the right of free speech and it's time
that he is flushed from the public
airways for his seditious and harmful
hate filled lies against Pres. Obama
and America.
Paul Warburg - "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent."
Easy dots to connect - Warburg ( who represented the Rothchilds , was there when the Federal Reserve was created . You know the banksters who control your money !
"In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all.
Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, as quoted in Time, July 20th, l992
Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws.
- Mayer Amschel Rothschild, l790 .
"It is well that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
Henry Ford
Don't believe Alex Jones ,SHEEP , read what riches bankers and powerful politicians HAVE SAID and if you still can't comprehend that, there is no hope for you , THEY SAID IT ! Do some research before you have a childish , baseless reaction . The quest for a NWO , started long before Obama anyway , Oreilly knows it and also knows Bush was in on it . It's all about the consolidation of the economic system and power, and the regulation they are creating include the consolidation of power , read the fine print . The same people who created this financial chaos , are in charge of fixing it , lol !
Google NWO quotes , Both Bushs , Gary Hart and many others mention the NWO .
As the population of the world has grown, counties have given way to principalities, principalities to kingdoms and kingdoms to empires. More people has meant fewer borders, fewer languages and fewer cultures. We are fusing into one.
So it's not really a question of whether there will be a single world government- that's almost inevitable. The question is: Who will have the power in that government- the many or the few?
And maybe what's required for the many to have the power is the few actually nudging the process along. Read Marx- the revolutions will come, but they'll be revolutions against the few capitalists who control industrial society.
Don't try to confuse the issue with half-truths and gorilla dust.
Wasn't Sarah Palin anointed with oil in Wasilla at the service of a Christian movement that promotes the conquests of the "seven mountains" of society (including government, education, business, and the media) by a small 5% cabal of evangelical Christians?
Isn't that a little "one world government" creepiness right there?
I never watch Fox "news" clips, but today I decided to watch this one. He's a friggin' comedian. "Justice Jihad"-- good one-- ha ha ha. What a f##kin' whackjob.
The sad and shocking part is, many Americans think this is news. It's Jerry Springer at a news desk.
far left loon >.<
He doesn't give a rat's ass about anything or anybody, but his big fat head/ego and the $10 million he makes a year. Ignore him.
far left loon >.<
It's liking ignoring the skunk when he thumps his feet, easy to ignore the thumps, but you might regret big time ignoring them. :)
He sure has a hard-on for George Soros. Wonder what's up with that??
far left loon >.<
*
"The greatest tyranny is censoring information in order to be better able to control people." - Cristina Saralegui
"One World Government" are code words for the far-right Evangelicals. Billy Boy is shamelessly pandering to the base - and not even trying to hide the fact. I have "born-again" friends who freak out when Fox News goes on and on about One-World Government and a World Currency and all that other crap. Those are codes words aimed straight for Evangelicals. And I'll tell y'all another thing, WE think BillO and Beck are NUTTY as hell, but I know people who take what they say to heart - and BELIEVE every words they are saying. Crazy I know, and AGGRAVATING to the extreme for me when talking to them about politics (they never make any sense and they spout second-hand crazy shit from Fox News - which sounds even nuttier coming at you second-hand!) - but don't dismiss what those guys do AND NEVER STOP proving them WRONG!!!
What you say.
Keep bringing the information to them, maybe some of it will sink in through their subconscious.
This asshole's head is gonna explode soon.
Bruce C Johnson
AGAIN! What a surprise!
As for: "O'Reilly wonders aloud if a black man is capable of being president, because "some conservatives" have claimed all along he is incompetent by virtue of his mixed race ..."
BillO The Clown is incompetent by virtue of his racism! That and his low capacity of mental and brain power. Asshat Supreme!!
all live by fear, they're cowards and pass that fear around where ever they go.
They look at the world as a frightful place (in some respects they're right), they lack the ability to face that world with courage and intelligence.
So striking out like cornered frightened animals is their answer.
In some ways I feel sorry for them, it must be a terrible thing to lack courage and be afraid every waking moment.
Comments are closed on this entry