When Conservatives are down, all they have to say is "Card Check"
By John Amato Wednesday Nov 19, 2008 5:00pmAs the country begins to turn away from Conservatism and Bush and depression runs deep in their veins, there does seem to be a phrase that lifts up their spirits. Everybody stand up and say "Card Check."
It's also known as the Employee Free Choice Act. And its progress in Congress has every corporate Fat Cat in America leaping into frenzied action. One of them, Home Depot founder Bernie Marcus, is saying that any corporate type who isn't on board in their fight against Card Check should be shot.
It's an obvious attack on unions and we need to be aware of this. Orrin Hatch loves to go on MSNBC, CNN or the National Review and proclaim that there will be no more secret ballots for workers so civilization in America will be destroyed:
In a time when unions are outraged with Democrats for their pro-immigration policies, big labor has launched an unprecedented lobbying campaign to force workers into unions. Labor unions are supposed to protect workers’ rights, yet union bosses want Congress to pass a law that actually robs workers of their democratic right to a private ballot.
That's all you get out of them. I doubt most Conservatives even know what a "Card Check" is, but it really riles them up.
The unions are just trying to make it easier for people to organize.
The Employee Free Choice Act (H.R. 800, S. 1041), supported by a bipartisan coalition in Congress, would enable working people to bargain for better wages, benefits and working conditions by restoring workers’ freedom to choose for themselves whether to join a union. It would:
- Establish stronger penalties for violation of employee rights when workers seek to form a union and during first-contract negotiations.
- Provide mediation and arbitration for first-contract disputes (PDF).
- Allow employees to form unions by signing cards authorizing union representation.
Frank Luntz and his friends are trying to say that unionizing will be all about busting heads like Sylvester Stallone did in his movie called F.I.S.T.. I was talking to Digby about it the other day and we both laughed at this new meme being passed around. But it's a serious one that we should not dismiss out of hand. They are laying the groundwork for average Americans who don't understand what the unions are doing, and will be offended by the "card check" plan for no reason at all other than what they've heard repeatedly on wingnut radio. Digby calls it "Pavlovian talk radio conditioning."
Ted Stevens loses his seat in Alaska? No problem, just yell "Card Check!"
Thomas Frank spells it out for us:
It's Time to Give Voters the Liberalism They WantDuring the campaign, you will recall, the debate over card check was supposed to be about principle, about democracy, about the sacredness of the secret ballot. However, as I pointed out a few months ago, union-certification elections often don't meet the most basic democratic requirements. Supervisors routinely hold captive-audience meetings with workers in preparation for elections; management commonly threatens to close up shop if the union wins; antiunion employees are frequently rewarded and pro-union employees are sometimes fired.
So it may not surprise you to learn that democracy isn't really the main concern of card-check's opponents. It's unions themselves. Changing the rules will make it easier to organize them.
The economic crisis, particularly the Big 3 meltdown, is offering the right what they see as a new opportunity to break unions and destroy any advances workers might have expected under a progressive government. They may be temporarily in disarray politically, but the right never forgets their primary mission --- protecting the wealthy. And they are very good at advancing that agenda whether in the majority or the minority. Under the Shock Doctrine, they have a perfect opportunity to end the union movement in America and they'll certainly do their best to take advantage of the moment.








Login or Register to post comments.
Big business is using this financial crisis to destroy all workers...union and non-union.
Its a perfect example of the application of N.Klein's "Shock Doctrine".
Meaning a poorly thought out conspiracy theory that has little use for actual facts or scholarship? Milton Friedman as the bogeyman is a rather laughable delusion to anyone who takes more than a few moments to apply the smell test to M. Klein's absurd hypothesis. I've seen better arguments from Intelligent Design kooks. Klein is the Von Daniken of economic theory.
Is that you?
The only thing I smell is your idiotic rambling. Go troll yourself!
Reminds me of when I was about to start Junior High school.
Every one told there would be in regular gym jock strap inspections.
rash limpballs was scarred for life when his jr high school coach insisted he keep his shorts up.
Too bad it's not, "No tickee, now shirty!!!"
But I ain't already rich and my name ain't Goldspanbergastein
Anybody who uses the term "union boss" without irony oughtta shampoo my crotch.
my old union bosses would have enjoyed that and probablyblow dried it for you! old baldy
scrub scrub rinse rinse scrub scrub rinse rinse!
due to bad customer service practices at a corporate level. More reason now NOT to go there. And Let me fulfill a teeny tiny promise I made to them: Home Depot sucks, not only vis a vis customer service, but they have utter disdain for their wage slaves.
If you shop at Home Depot, you deserve what you get in the way of shitty treatment.
is the same guy that has now sunk Chrysler.
Chysler only hired him to destroy the company, so it could be sold off in pieces.
This is the same asshole who changed home depot from a customer friendly store (that was great to shop at), into a place where you couldn't find help if you were offering $$$ for it.
I have to say I'm skeptical of card checks as well. There was an organizing effort at my workplace a few years ago, and there were numerous cases where employees were either intimidated into signing the cards by fellow employees, or they were given free alcohol while they listened to the union's spiel, or they were promised pie in the sky benefits that historically don't happen in union shops within my industry. I wasn't impressed with the union's methods or integrity.
I think the thing that bothered me the most about the whole process is that they were wasting their time at a company that actually does well for it's people, and meanwhile there are many people out there who desperately need collective bargaining (and I promise not to bring up the name Wal Mart. Whoops!)
Like the Battle of the Overpass (image here)?
Oh, wait, those are company men beating the shit outta a union man there to pass out pamphlets.
Fuck theses company goons!
that he and the boys used to drive up to Snoqualmie Pass in the 30s, and pull the scab drivers and beat the shit out of them. With baseball bats. I don't think it was an isolated occurrence.
If not for the unions we wouldn't have the fair wage, the 8 hour day, the 40 hour/5 day work week. Men and women bled and died for those rights that so many of us today take for granted. I see the labor movement as being no less noble than the American Revolution.
did'nt bush get rid of the 40 hr wk week? or at least get rid of the overtime pay requirement. I am union, and under contract, so the overtime thing has not affected me....yet.
in '03 and '05. The Republicans tried to push through two week "flex" scheduling, where a worker might work 50 hours in week 1 and 30 hours in week 2, but not get the 10 hours of overtime from the first week. I know that it was HR 1119 in the 108th Congress (in '03), but I don't know how it was id'd in the 109th Congress.
the Everett Massacre, m_k?
on the Everett Massacre.
And here's one on the following general strike involving the loggers.
I mean, my grampa was alive, but he was in Fairbanks or at Camp Lewis in the Army then, and my gran was in Seattle, but she was in an insular cultural group, famous for really not being in the thick of bullshit. Today I can pop out my front door and be in Everett in 20 minutes. In 1916, it was an all day trip.
I grew up in Dave Becks neighbourhood, and my best friend's dad was a past teamster local pres. Built like a brick shithouse, he was. He'dve been formidable without a baseball bat. Kathy's Dad might have been there, but he'dve been a kid (her parents were a good deal older; they'd adopted in their late 40s).
Here's a story he tells about organising:
"In the 1930s, Mr. Williams and Bombardier were in a small Arizona town, trying to organize warehouse workers. They had not been in town too long when word came down from the plant officials that they were going to be tar-and-feathered.
"We didn't stay there long enough to find out if it was true," [Bill] Bombardier said. They left town."
A lot of his stories end that way -- "We left town in a hurry." He had some gnarly scars too, times when they overstayed their welcome...
When I left Nordstrom I was offered a job with local 1001 Retailers, but I declined. Partly because I wanted to get a car, and I wasn't thinking 'Detroit,' which was kind of an unspoken deal -- you buy union. Couldn't see spending large money on a shitty car.
and I'm sure the coolies and child labor were treated well by the robber barons.
well the union i belonged to was run by the mafia , and four brothers whod skin your ass for a buck, they gave all thier buddys the best jobs sorry it was that i couldnt drop off a ham or a dozen chickens at thier houses or give them hours of free labor working on thier houses just to liver lip thier butts , but i got enough jobs to pay the bills and retire with a pension , course it wasnt as big a check every month that the asskisses recieved but its union made! bloody ridge
An Eclectic List of Events in U.S. Labor History
http://www.lutins.org/labor.html
The "Ludlow Massacre."
20 April 1914
In an attempt to persuade strikers at Colorado's Ludlow Mine Field to return to work, company "guards," engaged by John D. Rockefeller, Jr. and other mine operators and sworn into the State Militia just for the occasion, attacked a union tent camp with machine guns, then set it afire. Five men, two women and 12 children died as a result.
Many here have homes, or shop at home depot for goods. Buy elsewhere, and then send an email to marcus telling him that you just boycotted his store for the shameful way he treats America and his employees. I'll bet if we could 50% of people to buy their lumber or home improvement supplies elsewhere. He'd shut up in a minute.
We did it in the election, we can take America back from these thugs and punks.
Send copies of your receipts to Home Depot (From their competitors) explaining why they did not get that business. Especially if you are lucky enough to be able to do big work for big bucks (anything over a grand, should do nicely).
Treat your workers well and we will support you. Other than that...keep them cards and letters (with receipts) coming!
would help greatly. But, it is only part of the battle. Rescind the the so called 'right to work' provisions of Taft Hartley. That should be called the 'RIGHT TO WORK CHEAP' provisions.
Otherwise your Red States, when they do have unions, have unions that have no money to match negotiating firepower of management.
Don't fault the failures of some Union Management as a broad failure of Unionism.
All human organizations suffer from the vagaries of human nature.
the war is on... and the poor finally realize they are being fooled by the wealthy....
When enough people say we have had enough of making $10.00 an hour while the management makes 200k a year and decides it is enough of the difference and my work is just as important and demand equal pay.
I am all for a national walk out day. every employee says we want equal pay and benefits or we walk is when things will change.
But that will never happen because people feel trapped. They don't get the fact that if we on the bottom don't work, the big wigs don't make money either.
The paranoid slobs that advocating "secret ballot" privileges for employees wanting to organize are the same ones that willingly sacrificed our 4th Amendment right to privacy by significantly expanding government surveillance of its citizens in the name of "national security" and had no problem supporting the invocation of "executive privilege" as a smokescreen for illegal activities. And Gitmo---hey, if we don't have that then terrorists will be running the streets! Habeas Corpus? The Geneva Convention? Boy, those damn things are sure inconvenient obstacles--let's just pretend they don't exist for awhile! Spare me please---why don't you Repub jackasses can the phony moral superiority?
When you right wing fascists learn to treat people with equity and decency and get over your craven dependency on the crack of profit and shareholder return you won't need laws like this. Since you can't seem to get over yourselves and do what's right we'll just have to take redemptive actions to level the playing field.
I'm pretty much rabidly liberal, and I don't like card check. I really don't, not over secret ballot.
I've actually seen the evidence of card signatures being used illegitimately against my own coworkers, and it sucks. The union can't get an election because we're happy, so they're trying all kinds of underhanded shit, including intimidating folks who don't speak English very well and lying to them, telling them that they're only signing up to get more information. And since the law is on the union's side, they won't ever get prosecuted for it. It's underhanded, sneaky shit and I thought the labor movement was supposed to be above that.
I think the secret ballot protects everybody from coercion from both sides in a labor dispute. Getting rid of it is a mistake. It's easy to laugh off right-wing paranoia (I do it many times a day, mostly because it's fun, especially after this last election), but there still is union-led intimidation going on from some (not all) unions, and to eliminate a very basic protection is stupid.
You raise some good points. Adopting secret ballot would not be the end of the world, but of course the Retardlicans have intentionally overblown this issue to suit their selfish purposes. Certainly unions don't have a monopoly on virtue either but the current overall balance is tilted way toward business interests and we need to restore some equity to the system. To do nothing would be the worst mistake. People like Lilly Ledbetter, who got shafted by the SCOTUS and Goodyear deserve justice.
On the one hand I'm not directly affected so it isn't an issue I'm spending a lot of time researching.
On the other hand, I've done blue collar work. And I just want a STRAIGHT ANSWER that doesn't seem to be forthcoming. Like the business-sponsored ads claim, does it allow the employer to know how the individual worker voted? Is that a lie or isn't it?
It seems like there is a segment of "progressives" who think that concern is "amusingly uninformed." Tell me why that is so, because I have worked at places where it was clear an interest in unionizing was a quick way to get fired. I assure people it is not a frivolous concern in this day and age.
Login or Register to post comments.